Vivint and CPI Contest Over Testimony of CEOs
A two-year-long legal dispute between Vivint and rival CPI Security over claims of unfair competition is going to trial, with a skirmish developing over whether one or both company CEOs may be forced to testify.
In this note, we examine the reasons why the executives may be called to the stand, the arguments involved, and how the latest twist in the dispute impacts both companies.
Background ** ****
*********, ***** ********-***** *** ******** **** Vivint ** ****. **, **** ******** that ****** ***** *************** ******* ********* into ******* ** **** ****** ** posing ** *** ********* ** ********** and ********* "****-********* ********* *******."
***** ***** ******, ****** *************** ********* falsely **** *** ********* **** *** larger ******* *** "****** ****" ***** accounts, **** ****** ************ ***** ******* and *** ********* ****, ** **** Vivint *** ****** ** ****** ** CPI,********* ** *** *********.
*** **** *** *** **** ************ ***** ***** **** ***** ** alarm ********* ******* **** *** **** accusing ******' ***** *************** ** ********** to **** *** **** ** ** affiliated **** **** ** ***** ** lure **** *********.
CEO ********
**** ****** ******* ***. *, ****, Vivint ****** * ******** ** ****** ******* ************* **** ** *******. ******** *** ********* ******* ******* ****** ***** *** ******** *** issue * ********** ***** ********** ******* attempts ** ******* **** ********* ***** *********** ** **** ** ****** *** testimony.
*** ******* **** ****-***** ******'* ******** was ******** "** ****** ****** **. Gill" *** "***** ******** ** ***." CPI **** ** "***********" ****** ***** to ******** **** ***** *** ******* losing ******** ** **** **** "******* statements ***** *** ***** ***** ****** movement."
Boycott ** ***
******** ************* **************** **** *** ****** ********* ** the ****** ** ****, ***** *** murder ** ****** ***** ** *********** police ******** ******* ******** ********** *** country ********* ** *********.
*** ***'* ********, ** ** ***** to * ****** *** ******** *** led * ***** ****** ******* *********, were **** ****** *** ******** ** a ******* ** *** ** **** as *** *******'* **** ** *** and *** ********* ************.
****** * ******* * ****** *** Vivint, ******* ******** ** ********* *******, made ****** * ***** **, **** hearing, *** **** "** ** *****" Vivint ***** ** ****** ******** ** that *****.
*** ********* *** ***** ** *** fallout **** *** ***'* ******* ** a "*** *******," ****** ******** ** relation ** ******* ****.
********** *** ****** ********** ** ****** a **** **** ***** *** ********** made ** **. **** *** ******* toss **** ** ** *** **** of **** ***** ** ********* **. Gill ** ***** ** *** ****.
******* *** *************** *** **** *** and ****** *** *** ***** ** a ******* **** **** *** ******* about *** ******** ** **** ** possible ********* **** ****** ***.
Other *********
*** **** **** ********* ********** ****** to *** **** ** ****** **** other's ****, **** ****** ******* "**** have ********* ****** ** **** ******."
*** *******'******** ************ ******** ******** ****** ************** ********* Bywater. *** ***** **** ******* ** Vivint's ****** ********* **** **** *** an ********** ***** ********* ******** ********** about ******'* ********** ***** ********* *** describes ***** ********* ** "**********," ********* to ***.
******* ********** ** **** ****** *** ** *** ***** ******* of ****, **** *** ******* ** an *********** ** ****** ** ***. He **** ** ******** ** ***** Operating ************* *****.
*** **** ** ** **** ****** to ******** ******* ******* ** ***** in ****, ***** ** ******* ** 100-mile ********** ********** ***** *** ******* Rules ** ***** *********. *** ***** should "** *******" ******* ******* ** testify *** "**** ***** ****" ** Gill ** ********* ** *******, *** argued.
*** **** ******* *** **** *** subpoena ********** **** *** ****, ***. 6, ****, "***** ** *****" ******* Vivint **** *** ***** ********** ******** in *** ******* ***** ***** ** the *****.
Status ** *****
********* ** ***** *******, **** ********* was **** ** *** ***** ** Feb. *, ****, *** ******* ********** were **** *** ********* ***. ********* was ********* ** ******** ***. *, 2023. *** ***** ** ******** ** last ** ***** *-* ****, ********* to *********** *****.
*** ***** *** **** ******* ******** times ** ******* ******** ***** **** evidence, ********* ***** ******* *** *** discuss ******'* **** ***** ******* ******* competitors **** ******* ******* ** **** CPI ** ********, *** ******* ****** can *********"************ ****-******* ********."
*** "****-******* ********" ******** ****'* **** email ** *** ****** ******** ****** community ********, ***** ********, ********** ****** brutality ** * *****-******* ******* ** Charlotte. **** ******* ** ********' ****** call *** *** "****************" ** ****** and ****** ** ****** ******** ** saying:
******, ****** ***** **** **** ** a **** ******* ***. * ********* your **********. * ****** *** ** time, ***** ** ** ***** ** the ***** ** ***** ***** *** senseless ******* ** *** ***** *** by ***** ***** ***.
**** ***** ******** ********** *** *** comments.
*** ******** **** ******** ************ ********* ******* ****** *** ******** ******** racial **************, *********** *** ******** ***********.
*** ***** ****** *************** *** ************ ******'* **** ********,******** ******* ** ****'* *****,*** *** ************** *******. *** ***** has *** ** **** ** *** CEO *********.
Impact ** *********
******, ***** *** ***** ******** ***** actions **** ********** *** ******* ***** tactics, **************** ** *** ******* ***** ********** and ********** ** *******, *** *** ** ********* *** CPI ** ***** ** * ************ dealer ****** *** *****. ** ** loses, ****** **** **** ** *** as **** ** $** ******* ** damages,********* ** ***** *****.
*** *** **** ***** ******** *********** reputational **** ** ****** ** **** to ********* ****** *********** **** ****'* 2020 ***** *** ****** ******* ** racial **************.
*** ***** ******* ***'* **** ** block *** *** **** ****** ** testify: