China Uyghur Analytic Projects Require Intel And NVIDIA, Intel Condemns, NVIDIA Silent

By: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 02, 2019

At least 8 PRC China police projects require NVIDIA and Intel chips to power their Uyghur-detecting analytics, according to procurement documents found by IPVM.

Intel promptly condemned the usage while NVIDIA remains silent to IPVM inquiries. Intel told IPVM it had no idea about this and condemned human rights abusing applications of their products, adding that it did not always have control over where its chips end up. NVIDIA, which has heavily promoted Tesla GPUs for PRC smart cities in the past, did not respond to repeated requests for comment from IPVM.

Meanwhile, the PRC government has increasingly promoted the use of its own domestic chips, in sharp contrast to the ongoing requirements for US chips in these video surveillance projects.

In this note, we examine this news and the human rights concerns, including:

  • Background: Ethnicity Analytics in the PRC
  • Evidence Of Ethnicity Analytics Mandated from the Top
  • Examples: 8 Separate Police Projects
  • Western Equipment Easily Available
  • Not Subject to Sanctions
  • Intel: "Opposes Any Abuse of Human Rights", Can't Always Control Where Chips End Up
  • NVIDIA No Response, Previously Touted Tesla GPUs for China Smart Cities
  • Amnesty International: "Extra Precautions" Needed for AI Equipment

Background: Ethnicity Analytics in the PRC

The PRC government is cracking down on PRC's Uyghur Muslim minority, subjecting them to intrusive surveillance and sending at least a million to so-called 're-education camps'.

IPVM found government surveillance requirements and at least a dozen projects requiring analytics to identify Uyghurs across the country.

Eight Specifying Intel and NVIDIA

Of the 12 found, eight separate PRC police projects required NVIDIA/Intel equipment to power their systems, particularly NVIDIA's Tesla series GPUs. All of the projects were relatively recent, from 2018 and 2019.

Jinyun County

The Public Security Bureau (police department) of Jinyun County in Zhejiang province issued an equipment request for a video surveillance network which mandated Uyghur analytics and called for an NVIDIA Tesla GPU and Intel chips:

Translated into English, this spec reads (emphasis added):

Support historic statistics on people’s age, sex, whether they have glasses, whether they have hair bangs, whether they have sunglasses, and whether they are Uyghurs.

For further context, here is the full spec translated into English:

Lankao County

Lankao County in Henan Province issued a procurement document for a video surveillance network which includes a "live face comparison system" allowing police to search for Uyghurs:

★the system supports filtering functions for both real-time and historic human image captures. Filter criteria includes time, location, human features (such as age range, ethnicity (Uyghur), mask, bangs, sex, glasses, etc).

This particular system requires eight Nvidia Tesla P4 GPUs and two Intel E5 2680 CPUs:

Gansu Province

A Gansu Provincial Government tender for a surveillance network includes a "high-performance face recognition analysis system" with Uyghur analytics:

(15): Supports automatic labeling of captured faces [...] including age, gender, ethnicity (Han and Uyghur), color of clothes and pants, movement direction, whether or not [wearing] a backpack, whether using an umbrella;

This system requires Nvidia Tesla GPUs and Intel CPUs:

Yongtai County

Yongtai County in Fujian province issued documents for a surveillance network for its PSB which mandates Uyghur analytics:

In order to help the police more effectively screen targets, the system should be able to model each passerby and classify key features. The police investigators can use a number of attribute classifications to screen passers-by, such as age, gender, whether they are wearing glasses, or whether they are Uyghurs, so as to quickly locate the profile information of the suspect.

The network requires NVIDIA Tesla GPUs and Intel chips:

Yanghe New District

Yanghe New District in Jiangsu Province issued a call for an 'intelligent community' project built by the local PSB which mandates Uyghur analytics:

Live portrait comparison system: The system supports face detection function: support attribute recognition of captured passers-by; support analysis of passerby age, age range, ethnicity attributes, gender, whether wearing glasses, or Uyghurs;

NVIDIA Tesla P4 GPUs and Intel chips are requested for the project's servers:

Jingbian County

Jingbian County in Shaanxi province called for equipment for its local PSB, including an "intelligent portrait capture machine" with Uyghur analytics:

★ Uygur/Non-Uyghur attribute: It should support the detection of Uyghur/non-Uyghur facial attributes

The "machine" (likely a server, although this is not explicitly stated) requires Intel and NVIDIA chips:

Zibo City

Zibo City's Public Security Bureau (Linyi Branch) issued a call for equipment for its video analysis platform, which mandates Uyghur analytics:

Ethnicity: should support the identification of Han, Uighur, other

On the project's equipment list are Intel chips and GPUs with NVIDIA Pascal architecture:

Chongqing

Chongqing Municipality issued a tender for a "public security video surveillance network" in Nan'an district which included Intel chips for a server capable of detecting Uyghurs:

The underlined Chinese text reads "whether they are Uyghurs"; see below for a fuller translation:

Supports control of key persons [...] feature classification of captured pictures, and search according to criteria including: gender, age, whether [they have] glasses, sunglasses, whether [they have] bangs, whether they are Uyghurs

"Key persons" is a commonly-used term in PRC security which refers to Uyghurs and other groups that police believe are "suspected of threatening national security or public order", as reported in Foreign Policy magazine.

Later in the document, NVIDIA Tesla GPUs/Intel CPUs are requested for a server capable of "feature extraction":

Huaiyuan County

The PSB of Huaiyuan County in Anhui Province called for a "portrait recognition system" which mandates Uyghur analytics:

Personnel national identification: It has the function of identifying the ethnic groups (including Han and Uygur) in the uploaded images

The system's servers use Intel CPUs and a NVIDIA GTX1080 GPU:

Western Equipment Widely Available

Intel CPUs and NVIDIA GPUs are widely available almost anywhere in the world. For example, NVIDIA's Tesla GPUs are easy to purchase on Alibaba (China's equivalent to Amazon):

For this reason, Intel and NVIDIA chips being used for Uyghur analytics is not comparable to Hikvision or Dahua, who have directly won over $1 billion in video surveillance projects in Xinjiang.

Not Subject to Sanctions

The US government imposed sanctions on Hikvision and Dahua last month for their role in Xinjiang surveillance. However, a Tesla GPU being used by PRC police for Uyghur detection is not illegal/sanctionable, as long as the police are not in Xinjiang itself.

This is because the US sanctions only cover supplying US technology to specific Chinese companies and police departments in Xinjiang itself. However, the PRC's policies against Uyghurs extend far beyond Xinjiang, since many Uyghurs have migrated within the PRC - hence the use of Uyghur analytics by police all over the country.

Intel: "Opposes Any Abuse of Human Rights", Can't Always Control Where Chips End Up

Intel sent IPVM the following statement, saying "we do not always know nor can we control" the end-use of their equipment:

Intel opposes any abuse of human rights and has a policy to not ship any products in situations such as these unless we have high confidence that our products are not being used in connection with human rights abuses. Intel processors are general-purpose computing products that can be incorporated into countless systems and applications, and Intel products are resold through a large number of distributors and OEMs. We do not always know nor can we control what products our customers create or the applications end-users may develop. Notably, the RFP’s you cite are directed to others, not Intel. [emphasis added]

NVIDIA No Response, Previously Touted Tesla GPUs for PRC Smart Cities

NVIDIA did not respond to repeated requests for comment from IPVM. In a 2017 blog post about its Metropolis smart city program, NVIDIA promoted the use of Tesla GPUs in China, with Hikvision even praising their "outstanding performance":

[...] Offering a striking demonstration of what Metropolis makes possible, Hikvision has achieved recall rates of more than 90 percent for its identification and matching technology despite data volumes growing by more than 10x. This makes it easier to find lost people in crowded places. To achieve this, Hikvision combines a camera and network video recorder with NVIDIA Jetson at the edge, cloud servers powered by NVIDIA Tesla P4 GPU accelerators

“The GPU’s outstanding performance and NVIDIA’s end-to-end AI and deep learning platform can be applied to video streams to create smarter applications for a variety of industries,” said Shiliang Pu, president at Hikvision Research Institute.

Meanwhile, Huawei’s video content management (VCM) product is equipped with Tesla P4 GPU accelerators, improving overall performance by 22x.

To be clear, this September 2017 blog post predates the emergence of Xinjiang as an international human rights crisis and the US sanctions on Huawei/Hikvision/etc.

Amnesty International: "Extra Precautions" Needed for AI Equipment

Joe Westby, a researcher for Amnesty International's technology division, told IPVM that companies/governments need to take "extra precautions" so that AI equipment isn't used to fuel repression in the PRC given "widespread ethnic discrimination" there:

Governments and multinational technology companies must both take extra precautions to address the high risk that AI technology will fuel serious human rights abuses in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region or elsewhere in China. States must ensure that exports of relevant advanced technology are properly scrutinized for human rights risks. Companies have a responsibility to respect all human rights wherever they operate in the world, but given the extreme state of surveillance in Xinjiang, and widespread ethnic discrimination across China, companies should be on notice to ensure that their technology doesn’t contribute to these abuses.

The challenge, though, is how this can be done given how widely available these chips are.

PRC Chips Instead of US Ones?

One irony of the widespread requirement of US chips, such as Intel and NVIDIA, in these recent surveillance projects, is that the PRC government has been advocating for the use of domestic semiconductors, instead of US ones.

Indeed, AI / robotics expert Noel Sharkey told IPVM:

These [Intel, NVIDIA] are definitely the most powerful chips around for deep learning on the general market but I really think that if they were stopped, China would just find others and I imagine that there are Chines companies already working on developing their own versions.

It is reasonable that PRC companies are but it is unclear how long or how successful PRC companies will be. By contrast, the WSJ recently reported how Huawei is managing to make smartphones without US chips.

Conclusions

The fact that PRC police are using US technology to power their Uyghur analytics leads to several conclusions:

  • Once in the PRC, Western-made AI hardware and other technology can have explicitly racist/authoritarian end-uses, regardless of the intent/desire of the original manufacturer.
  • Despite the PRC's repeated claims of tech self-sufficiency, it remains heavily dependent on US chips & tech, even in sensitive police projects. The Gansu Province project examined by IPVM even mandated "completely domestic" algorithms but not chips.
  • While the human rights concerns here are obvious, placing controls on such equipment would be difficult. NVIDIA GPUs originated as graphics cards for gaming and remain very easy to obtain to virtually everyone, even if the end use is Uyghur detection and PRC surveillance. Intel processors, of course, are also incredibly common and easy to get all over the world.

The rise of AI video surveillance is increasing ethical issues and questions for both technology developers and governments worldwide.

Comments (7)

Only IPVM PRO Members may comment. Login or Join.

Huang is playing with fire, using Taiwan to bypass tariffs and profit from selling AI to China. Once China has successfully cloned Nvidia technology, they will shut the back to door to Huang or force his AI money to stay in China.

It should support the detection of Uyghur/non-Uyghur facial attributes...

what software packages currently support Uyghur identification?

No commercially available ones we have seen in the West. I'll let Charles address what is being offered inside of China.

devil’s advocacy:

imagine there was, besides IPVM, another independent security industry news organization (crazy i know, but bear with me).

now imagine that during their reporting they came to you and said,

”We have seen several of the deployment plans for facial recognition cameras in Uyghur. Some apparently were generated by a tool known as the IPVM calculator. Are you aware of this, and will you attempt to deny such use in the future?”

will you attempt to deny such use in the future?

We are banned in China, which effectively denies such use even now.

Also, the calculator does not do anything specifically for facial recognition so not clear how we could know or determine how it is used.

That said, we would take the same position as Intel, condemning such use.

It is quite probably the software they are using is using the SenseTime Facial Recognition Server.

Older System specifications requirements of their Servers for face detection are very close to the ones expertly reported here, which both specify use of GPU and als the Intel Xenon CPU's. Their software is using the CUDA part of the GPU to process the detections.

GPU * 4. Intel E5 CPU. Sounds familuar.

That was a fantastically researched article - well done - very informative and a reminder to manufacturers that they cannot hide what they are doing re: investigative journalism (there’s always a trail if you follow the money/shipping invoices).

Related Reports

Acquisitions - Winners and Losers on Dec 10, 2019
Most major manufacturers have been acquired over the last decade. But which have been good deals or not? In this report, we analyze the...
IP Camera Installability Shootout 2019 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Dec 09, 2019
What are the best and worst cameras to install? Which manufacturers make it the hardest or easiest to install their cameras? We tested 35 total...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Dec 02, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Directory of Access Reader Manufacturers on Nov 27, 2019
Credential Readers are one of the most visible and noticeable parts of access systems, but installers often stick with only the brand they always...
China Government Spreads Uyghur Analytics Across China on Nov 25, 2019
IPVM has found 12 recent government projects across China (PRC) that require Uyghur analytics and a general government guideline requiring such...
ISC East 2019 Show Report on Nov 21, 2019
IPVM has finished in New York City covering both days of the ISC East 2019 show. Here is a 6+ minute general walkthrough: Inside this report,...
The Cowardly, Greedy "Leaders" of Video Surveillance - SIA on Nov 19, 2019
The video surveillance industry suffers from cowardly, greedy 'leaders' focused on maximizing easy money while undermining public trust. The...
Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2019 on Nov 18, 2019
2019 has been an explosive year for video surveillance, with the world's two largest manufacturers, Dahua and Hikvision, being sanctioned for human...
Hikvision CEO And Vice-Chair Under PRC Government Investigation on Nov 14, 2019
In a surprising and globally covered move, Hikvision CEO Hu Yangzhong and Vice-Chairman Gong Hongjia are being investigated by China's securities...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Video Surveillance 101 Course Opened on Dec 12, 2019
IPVM is adding a Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the most important terms,...
Verkada Notification Outage on Dec 12, 2019
Verkada is suffering an event notification outage and analytic search failures. Inside, we examine what the issues are, what Verkada told IPVM...
Hikvision DS 2nd Gen Intercom Tested on Dec 12, 2019
With its newest IP intercom, Hikvision proclaims users can 'get full control over an entrance' regardless of where it is installed, home or office...
Honeywell 30 Series Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 11, 2019
Honeywell has infamously OEMed Dahua and Hikvision for years, but now they have introduced an NDAA-compliant line, the 30 Series, claiming "lower...
"Good Market, Bad Business Models" - Residential Security on Dec 11, 2019
Industry banker John Mack, at his company's annual event, took aim squarely at the problems in the residential security...
IP Camera Browser Support: Who's Broken / Who Works on Dec 10, 2019
For many years, IP cameras depended on ActiveX control, whose security flaws have been known for more than a decade. The good news is that this is...
Acquisitions - Winners and Losers on Dec 10, 2019
Most major manufacturers have been acquired over the last decade. But which have been good deals or not? In this report, we analyze the...
IP Camera Installability Shootout 2019 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Dec 09, 2019
What are the best and worst cameras to install? Which manufacturers make it the hardest or easiest to install their cameras? We tested 35 total...
Viisights Raises $10 Million, Behavior Analytics Company Profile on Dec 09, 2019
Viisights, an Israeli AI analytics startup marketing "Behavioral Understanding Systems", announced $10 million Series A funding. We spoke to...
Disruptor Wyze Releases Undisruptive Smartlock on Dec 06, 2019
While Wyze has disrupted the consumer IP camera market with ~$20 cameras, its entrance into smart locks is entirely undisruptive. We have...