Thermal Resolution Shootout

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Dec 06, 2012

thermal testEven for thermal cameras, resolution is a critical differentiator. While no MP thermal network cameras exist, users must choose between the equivalent of CIF and 4CIF cameras or roughly double the resolution. Doing so is important because the cost increase between the two is massive, essentially doubling the price and adding thousands of dollars per camera. Is it worth it for the higher resolution, and if so, what situations?

The Test

To better understand the performance differences between these two resolution levels we tested the two options from three manufacturers - Axis, FLIR and Pelco - in very dark conditions as shown in the image above.

The test was done in a open field, at multiple distances: 300', 600', 1200', and 1800', as illustrated in this image:

Site Overview

And if you are thinking, "Wouldn't it be great if IPVM did a shootout of all these manufacturers head to head?", yes, that's coming up soon. We are building up to it but this one is extremely informative by itself.

Key Recommendations

The increase in resolution did not deliver material tangible benefits and, in some cases, the lower resolution version, delivered a higher contrast, easier to discern image than the higher resolution one. Given how much more expensive the 4CIF versions are, we recommend extreme caution on purchasing them unless you can validate material advantages in your environments.

One clear benefit is in close ranges, i.e., narrow Field of Views. For instance, of the comparisons, the one with the narrowest FoV (80 feet) showed the greatest increase of details for the 640 cameras. However, using thermal for such applications is fairly niche and irrelevant to the long range, perimeter, exterior focus common in surveillance applications.

One other potential benefit of 4CIF is distances beyond 2000 feet. While most 'CIF' thermal camera's specified range is ~2000 feet, 4CIF typically are rated for ~3500 feet. However, in our tests at nearly 2000 feet, both versions looked to be fairly close to the edge of usability. If you are monitoring farther than 2000 feet with a 500+ foot FoV, it is possible than 4CIF provides some benefits.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Image Analysis Screencast

This 2 minute video overviews the main imaging differences between CIF and 4CIF:

Image Optimization

For this test, each manufacturer's cameras used similar exposure zones, gain, and contrast settings wherever possible, to provide as much standardization as possible. Axis and FLIR allowed for custom exposure settings, while Pelco's cameras do not, instead operating in fully automatic mode.

Field of View Differences

Despite using the same focal length lens, each manufacturer's 320x240 or 384x288 camera has a slightly different field of view than its 640x480 model, due to differences in sensor size. We have noted this in each manufacturer's section. Though the lower-resolution models have slightly narrower fields of view, 640x480 models provide nearly double the horizontal resolution across a slightly wider area.

Axis Q1921 vs. Q1922

We tested two Axis cameas, a 384x288 resolution Q1921-E (~$4,300 online) and a 640x480 Q1922-E (~$9,000 online). Both of these cameras use 35mm lenses, with 16 and 18-degree focal lengths respectively. Axis claims a maximum human detection range of 2,298' with the Q1921 and 3,444' with the Q1922, well beyond the ranges we tested.

Users may download a 30-second video clip from both of these cameras themselves.

At 300 feet:

Axis 300'

At 600 feet:

Axis 600'

At 1,200 feet:

Axis 1200'

At nearly 1,800 feet:

Axis 1800'

FLIR F-313 vs. F-618

From FLIR's F Series, we tested an F-313 (320x240 imager, $5,500 MSRP) and an F-618 (640x480, $14,560 MSRP), with 13 and 18-degree FOVs, respectively. FLIR claims detection at 2,559' with the F-313 and 3,740' using the F-618.

Users wishing to see video from these cameras themselves may download a 30-second clip.

At 300 feet:

FLIR 300'

At 600 feet:

FLIR 600'

At 1,200 feet:

FLIR 1200'

At nearly 1,800 feet:

FLIR 1800'

Pelco TI335 vs. TI635

Finally, we tested two Pelco Sarix TI thermal cameras, both with 35mm lenses, the TI335 (384x288, ~$5,000 online) and the TI635 (640x480, ~$10,000 online). Like Axis, this results in 16 and 18-degree fields of view, respectively. A 30-second clip of both Pelco cameras is available for review. Detection range is specified at 2,493' using the TI335 and 3,709' using the TI635.

At 300' feet:

Pelco 300'

At 600 feet:

Pelco 600'

At 1,200 feet:

Pelco 1200'

At nearly 1,800 feet:

Pelco 1800'

Related Reports on Thermal

IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...
FLIR Launches Body Cameras Unified With VMS (TruWitness) on Dec 11, 2018
While FLIR is best known for their thermal cameras, now they have expanded into body cameras, launching TruWITNESS, a public safety focused body...
VMS Export Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Sep 13, 2018
When crimes, accidents or problems occur, exporting video from one's video surveillance system is critical to proving incidents. But who does it...
Axis Guardian - Cloud VMS And Alarm Monitoring - Released on Jun 19, 2018
Axis has struggled to deliver a cloud-based managed service video platform. Video service providers have utilized AVHS for over a decade, and have...
Directory of Video Surveillance Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities and Exploits on May 02, 2018
This list compiles reported exploits for security products, and is updated regularly. We have summarized exploits by date and by manufacturer,...
FLIR Launches Saros on May 01, 2018
Has FLIR solved the video intrusion / remote monitoring problem or have they created an overkill, overly expensive device? FLIR has launched...
Hanwha Mega ISC West Product Releases on Apr 05, 2018
While overall new product releases have been slowing over the past few years, Hanwha is releasing a slew of 6 new offerings for ISC West,...
70+ New Products Directory Spring 2018 on Apr 02, 2018
We have compiled a list of new products for Spring 2018 in the categories: Video Surveillance Access Control Fire and Intrusion Other...
Dahua Acquires Lorex And FLIR SMB Surveillance From FLIR on Feb 06, 2018
Would you buy your own customer? Well, Dahua has just done that. FLIR has sold its Lorex / home / SMB business to Dahua, just over 5 years after...
CES 2018 Show Final Report on Jan 12, 2018
This is IPVM's final edition of our 2018 CES show report. Below are already numerous images and commentary, with more coming tomorrow.   CES is...

Most Recent Industry Reports

2019 Camera Book Released on Jan 22, 2019
This is the best, most comprehensive security camera training in the world, based on our unprecedented testing. Now, all IPVM PRO Members can get...
Milesight Company Profile on Jan 22, 2019
Milesight Technology, a Chinese company building an International branded business, says they are slowly building their presence through a series...
Intersec 2019 Live From Dubai Day 2 on Jan 22, 2019
There’s a massive presence from Chinese or China-focused video surveillance firms, chiefly Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, and Infinova, at...
Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have become core features of video surveillance systems, as virtually all professional IP cameras integrate with...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact