Testing Super Low Cost VMS (Xeoma)

Author: Sarit Williams, Published on Jun 27, 2013

VMS software for less than $3 per channel? Prices have certainly come down over the last few years, but a relative newcomer is pushing them even lower. FelenaSoft's Xeoma charges no more than $19.95 per channel and under $10 per channel for 32 cameras ($299.95), down to a few dollars for hundreds of channels.

Plus, the software is being actively developed every month.

However, is the price too good to be true? How does it really stack up?

*** ******** *** **** **** $* *** *******? ****** **** certainly **** **** **** *** **** *** *****, *** * relative ******** ** ******* **** **** *****.**********'* ************** **** **** $**.** *** ******* *** ***** $** *** channel *** ** ******* ($***.**), **** ** * *** ******* for ******** ** ********.

****, *** ******** ******* ******** ************** *****.

*******, ** *** ***** *** **** ** ** ****? *** does ** ****** ***** **?

[***************]

Key **** ********

***** ** ** **** ** ***, ***** ** *** ******* VMS, ***** *** ******* ** **** **** ****. *******, ** has ***, ** ***, ******** / ************ *******. *** ***** third ***** ****** *********** ****** **** ******** ******* (******** ***** exact ****** *** ** '*********** **** ******' ******), ***** *** not (**** ****** ** *** *******).

** *** *** ******* *** ********* ****** ****'* *********** *** home / ***** ******** ***, ***** ** ***** ***********. *** more **** ****, ** ** *********** ** *** *** **** developed ***** ** ** ******** *** **** **********, *** ****** unattractive *** **********.

Xeoma ********

**** the ***** ***. ** ********* *** ***** **:

Key **********

****** *****, ***** ******* ** *** ******** '*******', *** ******* other ****** ** ********** ** ***. **** *** * *** specifics:

  • ********: *********** ***********- *** *** **.***, *** *** *** **.*** (** ********, *** **** files.  ** ***** *** ***** ************* ***** *****/******** ***** **** to ** ******, **** ** ****** ********* ***********)
  • **** ** *** ********* ****** ******* ***-******* *** ********* **** of ******** ****** *************/********** (*** **** ****** ** ***** **** the ******** *** ********** *** ***-*** *** *** ****** ****** an ***** *** ********, ******* ** ******* ****)
  • ********** ******** **** ** *********** ** ****** ******* (**** ***) and **** ************* *******. (********* ** **** ****** ***** *******)
  • ****** *******: **** ******** ******* **** ********** ********* ******* **** *** thus ********* ******'* ******** ** *** ***** ****** **** ******* different ****** ********.
  • *** ***** *******: *** *** ***** *.*** ******** ************ ******** users *** ******** **** *** ********** ** *** ***** ******** card. *** **** ******** ****** *** ********* ** **** ******* (*********** through rtsp protocol) **** ***** ******* ******, ***** ** *** ******* ******. (In ********, ***** ***** **** ***** ******* *** *** ********* choose *** ***** ****** *** *** ****'* *********** ** ******.)** did *** **** ***** *******.
  • ***** ************ **** **** **** ***** ******* **** ** *****, Google, ***. (******** ** ***** ***** ********* * **** ******)
  • **** ** * ******* ** *** ***** *********, *** **** be ********* *****
  • ******* *** **** ******* ********* -** *** *** (****** ****** apps ** ******** ****** *********** *** ***** ***** ***** ****) 
  • ****** *******: ******* ******* ********* ********** *** ******* **** ********** (no ******* ********) ** * ***** ****** ********** ** ******* ***** ******.

 

Key *************

*************, **** ** * ********** ************ ***, ** ****, ******* many ******** ********** ***************: ****** ******* ***********, ***** **********, ***** analytics, ******* ***** ************. 

********, ***** *******, ****** *******, *** *** **** **** *** of *** * ***** ******* ** ***** **** *** ************ confirms **** **** **** *** *** *** ******** ***** *********** test. 

****** ***** *** ********** ****, * ****** ** ******** *** missing *** ** ****, *********:

  • ** ******* ******: ** ****/****, ******** ******* ** *** ******* ** ****** across ******** *******
  • ** ******* **** *** ********, *** ** ** * *** capable ****** **** ******* **** ** ***.
  • ** ****
  • ** ******* ** *** ******* ***** ******, *********** *** **** keyboard ***** *** ** ******** **** *********** ******** *** **.
  • ********* *** ** ***** **** ** **, **** ** ******** fields *** *** ** ******* ********* ** *** *** (******** issue)
  • *** **** ****** ** ***** **** *** ******** *** ********** and ***-***. **** ******* ** ****** ***** ***-***, ***** *** annoying, **** **** ******** **** ********* **** ***** * *****, others **** ****** ******.  
  • ** *** *** *********
  • *** ********** ** ** ***-** ******* **** ***** ~*.* ***** per *******- ***** ****, ****** ***. 
  • *** ***** ***** *** *********** .*** *****, **** *** ***** or ****** ** ******* ****** **** ********. 
  • *******: ******* ** ******* ** ****** *** ******* *** ***** only; **** * ***** ** ******** ***** ***** ** ********* are ***-**** ***.

*** ***** ***** **** **** ** ***** ** ******:

 

************

************ ******* *** *******, *****, *** *** ******* *** *********. **** ******** *** install ****, ** ***** **** **** ** ******* ** *** a **** ***** ** *** ******** *********** ****** * ****** **** on *** ******* *** **** *** ******* ** *** (**** without ********). ** **** ** ***** *** *******.

Test *****:

** **** **** *** ******* (*********) ******* ** *** (** X **.*.*) *** *** **** ******* ******** (******* *, ** bit). ** **** **** *******: ****** (***** **** *** ***), ****, *****, and Ycam.  

**********

*******, ***** ** * ***** ****** *** ***** ******* *** an ********* *** ***** *** * ***.  ** ****** *** non-technical ***** *** ******* ** ********* *** ******, ***** ******** advanced ***** *** ******* ** ******* *** ******** ** *** low ***** *************, ** ******* ******. ** ***** **** ***** - must **** – *************; ** ******** ** ********** ***** ********. These ******* ********** ********* ******* * ******* ** * ******* contender **** ******** ** ***** ***** ***** ***** **** ********* and *****. ** *** ***** ****, ********** ** * **** moving ******* **** *** ******** ***** *** ***** *** *** become **** ** * ****** ** *** ****** ***** ***** the *** **** ****** **** **** ********** ********.

 

Comments (14)

Sarit - Where did you get the camera feeds from?

Via VPN, but the YCAM was local and onsite. The worldcams were an available, built in, option in Xeoma.

Luxriot is cheaper and has pro features like search, federation, ad integration, video analitics ..

Luxriot is cheaper????

Luxriot is certainly better overall, but it's nowhere close to as inexpensive as Xeoma is.

Comparison

Luxriot 4 channels ~$269, Xeoma 4 channels - $59.95

Luxriot 9 channels ~$449, Xeoma 9 channels - $139.90

Luxriot 16 channels ~$539, Xeoma 16 channels - $199.95

Luxriot 'Unlimited' per Server ~$1400, Xeoma 256 channels - $1119.95

Well it is cheaper if you have more than 500 cameras like me, plus the value cost relation is better when buying luxriot unlimited, if you have fewer cameras xeoma is cheaper but i still question if its worth it since you can jump to luxriot just for a bit more.

You have 500 cameras on a single server? Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought Luxriot Enterprise covers cameras on a single machine, i.e., if you have 5 machines with 100 cameras each, you buy 5 Enterprise licenses?

Either way, using Xeoma for more than a few dozen cameras would be crazy, as they lack the features needed for larger scale management so even if you could save a few dollars in product cost, it would be a bad idea.

Yes. The way I understand it is although Enterprise offers unlimited channels and clients it is PER server. So if you get 500 cameras per server than you only pay one Enterprise fee of $1349 - about ~$2.70 a channel.

However, if you have 5 servers to split those 500 cameras, you would need to pay the Enterprise fee 5 times thus increasing your per channel cost to ~$14.00 per channel.

You are completely correct, in my case i have 500 in just one server. :)

Daniel, would you elaborate on the setup? Type of cameras and settings, server, number of users...how long has this one server been in operation?

Cray XC30 might do it...

Ha! So expensive it requires a quote request, found out it's 500K...Thanks Marty! So where were we with trying to calculate cost savings on channels?

So say you spent 500K for this server and loaded 500 channels with Enterprise version..all in all it'll cost you ~$1000 per channel???

Well, in fairness, Cray has a $25K model too - the CX1 (runs a special version of Windows too!)

I was really just being facetious, indicating my doubts about the 500 cams on 1 box comment. :)

If you can put 500 hundered cameras on one server I would be very very surprised, the data throughput requirement would be outragous, even if the cameras are recording at a low image quality

It has been brought to OpenALPR's attention that Felenasoft (ANPR) is distributing our software illegally. They are free to use our open source software if they comply with the AGPL requirements. They are not free to sublicense our software if they are in compliance.

"The Affero GPL (AGPL) is designed to close the so-called 'application service provider loophole' in the GPL, which lets ASPs use GPL code without distributing their changes back to the open source community. Under the AGPL, if you use code in a web service, you required to open source it."

To the best of our knowledge Felenasoft has not made their source code available as required nor have they licensed our commercial software which supersedes these requirements.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
2019 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 14, 2019
The new IP Networking Book 2019 is a 285 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
Arecont Costar Layoffs on Jan 14, 2019
Arecont Vision, a Costar Company, has laid off more than 10% of their workforce in a move the company described to IPVM as a result of "important...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact