Testing $29 ONVIF IR IP Chinese Camera

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 08, 2014

The #1 IP camera problem is cost, as unique IPVM survey results show. Rectifying that is critical.

Last month, we received a (spam) email offering IP cameras, with integrated IR and ONVIF support for $29.90 from Wodsee [link no longer available].

We get hundreds of Chinese manufacturer spam emails monthly but this was, by far, the lowest price we have ever seen for IP cameras. Too good to be true? Perhaps, but too cheap to not try.

Wodsee immediately upsold us to the PoE version for $10 more but still at less than $40 for such a camera, it was hard to pass up so we bought 2 of them - the 720p version for $39.90 and the 1.2MP one for $49.90. Add in $33 to ship it directly from China and a week later, we had them.

Here's what they look like in our test setup (from left to right, Dahua, Wodsee 1.2MP, Wodsee 720p and Hikvision):

The cameras worked, not perfectly, but far better than we expect for being so cheap.

Here are specific key findings from the test:

  • Image quality in full light and dark with IR on comparable to low cost IR cameras from Hikvision and Dahua, with no notable issues.
  • Effective IR range of about 15m ("20-30m" is claimed on specifications), with significant hotspotting in the center of the image.
  • IR power does not automatically adjust to compensate for subjects in the scene. However, autoexposure is adjusted, preventing subjects from being washed out at close range.
  • While the camera offered a clean, simple web interface, it lacked many professional settings. Users may only selection resolution, framerate, VBR or CBR, and I-frame interval. No compression adjustments are available.
  • ONVIF integration only worked on half the VMSes we tried. While the cameras are functional when connected to Milestone XProtect and Video Insight, neither Exacq nor Genetec coulc. Further, neither camera is listed on the ONVIF conformance page. RTSP streaming is also available.
  • Bandwidth consumption lower than other low cost cameras in full light, and similar in low light with IR on. Compression was lower than average (good), about 24 on the quantization scale in full light and 26 in low light.

Technical Support

Users should not expect much, if any, technical assistance from Wodsee. We contacted Wodsee's technical support in two ways, via email and via phone. We have yet to receive a response to our phone call. By email, we asked for support in adding the cameras via ONVIF to a VMS. Instead, strangely, we received instructions on how to manually forward ports for remote access. 

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Pricing

Wodsee cameras may be purchased directly from the manufacturer. They have no distribution or online sales. Pricing is as follows:

  • WIP100 [link no longer available]: $39.90 USD
  • WIP130 [link no longer available]: $49.90
  • Dahua IPC-HD2100N [link no longer available]: $142.00 online [link no longer available]
  • Hikvision DS-2CD2032-I [link no longer available]: ~$260 online

Recommendations

Considering their pricing, a fraction of even low cost competitors, Wodsee's cameras may be attractive to many users, especially considering their acceptable image quality and if they can be made to integrate with one's VMS.

Obviously, though they remain a risk, with minimal support and track record. If you really care about super low price, we think it is worth trying out but be careful in assessing long term risks and costs of using them. 

Physical Overview

This video covers the physical construction of the camera. Users should note two key issues:

  • The camera's Ethernet/PoE connector is exceptionally large, and may be challenging to hide during installation.
  • There are no ports or connectors other than PoE and 12VDC power, such as audio, I/O, etc.

Teardown

Below is a teardown of the camera, performed after the IR cut filter got stuck after about a month of operation:

This image shows the effects of the filter being stuck:

Configuration/Integration

This screencast reviews the web interface of the Wodsee cameras. The web interface is simple, with few configuration options:

  • No CODEC settings are available aside from resolution, framerate, and CBR/VBR options. No compression options are provided. 
  • Some settings, such as WDR and time sync options, simply did nothing.

This screencast reviews the cameras' ONVIF conformance and integration with third party VMSs. The manufacturer claims ONVIF conformance, and ONVIF Device Manager reports it has implemented version 2.0, but it is not listed by ONVIF. Integration to VMSs is buggy. The camera can be added to both Video Insight and Milestone, while attempting to add it to Exacq or Genetec results in continuous reboots of the camera and no streaming video. RTSP streaming worked fine in all VMSs.

Image Comparisons

In full light, with a HFOV of ~24' (~53 PPF), both Wodsee cameras perform comparably to low cost IR models from Dahua and Hikvision, with no notable issues. Colors are displayed differently on each of the Wodsee cameras, with the WIP130 warmer with slightly truer color.

 

In low light, with IR on, the Wodsee cameras again perform similarly to Dahua and Hikvision. In this case, the WIP130 is slightly clearer, with lines on the chart easier to read, though the bottom lines become washed out around line 7.

IR Performance

Specified IR range on both Wodsee cameras was listed as "20-30m." We found ~15m to be the actual effective range:

Illumination was weak at 20m, with the subject much more difficult to spot:

Finally, illumination was practically nonexistent at 30m:

IR Pattern

Both Wodsee cameras' IR patterns were much stronger in the center than at the edges of the FOV, as seen in this comparison. 

However, subjects at close range were not washed out. This due to exposure adjustment, not a weakening of IR power, as seen in the video below. While it is positive that subjects at close range are not overexposed, the background of the image is lost when exposure is adjusted, obscuring activity or subjects there.

Bandwidth

Both Wodsee cameras' bandwidth was lower in full light than both Dahua and Hikvision. The WIP100 was lower than the other cameras in low light with IR on, while the 130 was approximately the same as Dahua and Hikvision. Note that there is no user control of compression in Wodsee firmware. When analyzed, both cameras averaged about 25 on the quantization scale (which is relatively low compression - industry average is 27-30, higher compression levels).

Test Parameters

Cameras were tested using default settings. These are the firmware versions used for this test: 

  • Dahua HDW2100N: 2.210.General 01.0R
  • Hikvision DS-2CD2032-I: 5.02 build 130805
  • Wodsee WIP100-S20: 1.2.1.227383
  • Wodsee WIP130-S20: 1.2.1.227383

5 reports cite this report:

Chinese Direct Disruptor Reolink Tested on May 31, 2017
Another Chinese disruptor, Reolink, is gaining attention. This one is selling direct from its own website, with fulfillment by Amazon. And a...
Chinese Spam Access Control Is Here on Aug 04, 2016
Notorious spammers like Longse, Cantonk, and Wodsee have flooded the video market with nuisance emails touting ultra low cost cameras for years,...
Small Chinese Manufacturers at ISC West on Apr 20, 2015
There were ~100 small Chinese, Taiwanese and Korean vendors with tiny booths at ISC West 2015. IPVM spoke to a number of these companies to better...
Super Low Cost Chinese Camera Shootout on Feb 25, 2015
The 'Chinese' are the industry's #1 threat (or opportunity depending on one's perspective). IPVM has extensively covered the rise of Dahua and...
IP Camera Costs Comparison and Trends 2010 - 2014 on Jun 25, 2014
Over the past 4 years, the average price of 100+ IP cameras surveyed has decreased ~25%, at an annual decline of ~5%. In this report, we break...
Comments (39) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Pelco GFC 4K Dome Camera Tested (IMP831-1ERS) on Mar 12, 2019
Pelco has finally released their first 4K IP camera, after years of competitors' releases. Is this move too late? Or is their new GFC Professional...
UTC Interlogix Series 6 Tested on Mar 25, 2019
UTC Interlogix has long been deceptively OEMing Hikvision as our 2017 results show. Now, Interlogix is back with their newest IP camera series,...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...
AVTech ~$70 IP Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 04, 2019
Taiwanese manufacturer Avtech is taking direct aim at low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision with ~$70 starlight and white light illuminator...
Honeywell 30 Series Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 11, 2019
Honeywell has infamously OEMed Dahua and Hikvision for years, but now they have introduced an NDAA-compliant line, the 30 Series, claiming "lower...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Motorola / Avigilon Drops ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
Motorola Solutions has pulled out of ISC West 2020 effective immediately, because of coronavirus concerns, IPVM has learned. This is done amidst...
Cancel or Not? Industry Split Over ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
The industry is split, polarized, over whether ISC West 2020 should run or be canceled. New IPVM survey results of 400+ respondents show heated...
Coronavirus Hits Sony, Bosch Says Switch on Feb 26, 2020
Sony's fall in video surveillance has been severe over the past decade. Now, they may be done. In this note, we examine Bosch's new...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London police, but this time the system was thwarted by technical problems and...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new IPVM test results show cause major problems for facial recognition...
Every VMS Will Become a VSaaS on Feb 21, 2020
VMS is ending. Soon every VMS will be a VSaaS. Competitive dynamics will be redrawn. What does this mean? VMS Historically...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance on Feb 20, 2020
This is the last chance to join IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the...
Vulnerability Directory For Access Credentials on Feb 20, 2020
Knowing which access credentials are insecure can be difficult to see, especially because most look and feel the same. Even insecure 125 kHz...