Foscam Low Cost SD PTZ Tested

Author: Derek Ward, Published on Dec 23, 2013

$68 for an IP PTZ?

That's what the Foscam FI8910W goes for on Amazon where it is the #2 overall selling surveillance camera. We bought one to try it out.

Obviously, at $68, it's no enterprise speeddome. Indeed, there is no optical zoom, and it's SD resolution only. On the other hand, it has built in IR, a true mechanical cut filter and pans 300° and tilts 120°.

While no one is going to seriously use this for professional surveillance, the potential for home and SMB use is clear but how well does it perform?

$** *** ** ** ***?

****'* **** ******************** *** ** *********** ** ** *** #* ******* ******* ************ ******. ** bought *** ** *** ** ***.

*********, ** $**, **'* ** *******************. ******, ***** ** ** ******* ****, *** **'* ** resolution ****. ** *** ***** ****, ** *** ***** ** IR, * **** ********** *** ****** *** **** ***° *** tilts ***°.

***** ** *** ** ***** ** ********* *** **** *** professional ************, *** ********* *** **** *** *** *** ** clear *** *** **** **** ** *******?

[***************]

Key ********* *** **********

**** *** ****, **** *** *** *** ********* ** *****:

  • ***/**** ******** ******* ****, **** *** ******* *** ****** ********* without ****** ** ******.
  • ** ************ ***** ** **** ****** ************* (**/~**'), ******** ** least ~**'. *******, ****** ************ ****** ** *** ****** ** the *****, **** ** ********* ** ****** ********** ** ** power.

******** ** *** *** ********** *****:

  • **** ** ********, **** ** **** **** **** *** ******, it *** **** ** **** *** ******* ** * ****, while ***** **** ** ******* ***** ** ** *** *******.
  • ** *** ***** ******, ******* ****** *** ********** **************** ** ************, ********* ******* ** **** **** ***** *****.
  • ***** ****, **** ** ******** ***** **** ****** *** ****** and ********** *********. ** ******* *** **** ** *****. *** surprisingly, **** ********* *********** *** *** ******* ***** *******.
  • ****** ****** ** *** **** ** ****** **** ********** ****, with ** "***** ****" ********** ** *** ******** *********.

***************

** *** ******* **** *** ******* ** ******** ***/**** *** your *** *** *******, **** ** *** ****** *** ***. Otherwise, *** **** $** ** $*** ****, *** *** *** many ****** *******, ***** ******* ****, ****** ** ****** *******.

Physical ********

** **** ***** ** ****** *** ******'* **** ****** *** physical ************:

Web ********* ********

**** ***** ******* *** ******** ** ************ *********, ***** *** ***** **********:

****** ******

****** ****** **** ** **** *** ****** ****** **** ***** with ***'* ****** (********** ** **** ***). ***** ** ** **** '***** ****' ********** *************** ***** ** ********* *** *********. ** ****, ***** *** get ********** *** ***** * *** ** **** ****** **** have ****** ********* ****** (******* ***** ** *********, **** **********, etc.).

******** ***********

****** *** ****** ******* ***.***/*/*, ** **** ****** ** ******* it ** *** ****** ******* (***** *******, ***** ** ******** key *** *******). ** **** **** ** ******* ** ** a ******** ******** ******, *******. **** ***********, ** ******** ** given ** *** **** ** ** *** ********** *****, ******, leaving ***** **** ******* *********** *** ***************.

IR ***********

** ****** *** *******'* ** ************ ***** ** ******* *********, starting **********'********** ***** ** * ****** (~**-**'). ************ ** **** ***** was ******, **** *** ******* *** *** **** ***.

************, ****** *** *** *** ** ~**', ************'**************, *** ******* ** ***** **** ***********.

*******, **** **** ************ ***** ***** ******* *** ****** ** close *****. ******* ** *** ******* *** ****** ********** ******** with *** ** ~**' **** *** ******. **** ** ********** problematic *********** *** ******* ** **** ****** ** ** **** in ******* **** *** ****** *****, *********** *** *** **** and ** **********.

Image ***********

** ******** *** ******* ** *** *** **** ** *******, the**** *********** *******(**** ~$*** ******), ** *** *** ********* ** ********** **** using * ****** **** ***********. ** ****** ** *** ******, ~12' *** ~**', ** **** ********** *********** ***********.

**** **** ***** *** ** ***** ******* *** ***** ******, they **** ********* ** ********* ********* **** *** ******* ** this ****, ** **** *********** ** ***** *** **** ** the *********** *****.

**** *****

** **** ***** ***** (~**'), *** ******* *** ********** *********** our ******* *** ********* *** ******* ******** (**** ** *** color, ****** ********, ***.). **** **** ******* ****** ******* ******* of ******* *** *****.

*********** ******* *********** ** ****** *****, **** *** ******* ****** to ******* **** *** ***** **** ** *** *** *****, let ***** *** ******** ** *** **** *******. *** **** and ***** ******* *** **** ** *********** **** ***** ** our **** ***** (******* **** *-*), ** **** ** *********** features ** *** ***** *******.

** *** *****, **** ** **, *** ******* ****** ******* even *** ***** ******* ** ***** ** **** *****, *** to************** *************. *** ******* ** **** ** ******* ******* ** **** subject *** ***** ******* ** *** ****** ********** *** **** even ** ************. *** ***** **** **** *** ** ****** to ******* *** ***** ** **** *** *****.

** ****** *****, *** ******* ******** ** ******* **********, **** our ******* ****** ************ ** *****.

Bandwidth ***********

*** ******* ** ***** ****, **** ** ******* *** *.*** or ****-*. *******, ***** *** ** ***** ******** ***** **** resolution (*** ** **** ****) *** ***** **** (*/* *** through ** ***), **** ** *********** ** ******* ***** **** typically **** ** ************ *******.

******* ** ****, ********* *********** *** ********** ****, ********** *********** it ** ** **********.

Comments (8)

IPVM, good info as always. At work I use the good stuff, but at home... I was lazy (didn't want to cable) and thought these wi-fi Foscams would be just the ticket, so I was using a few of these PT(noZ) Foscams inside my house and some bullet ones on the outside. I've since started replacing them with PoE wired 1.3MP Dahua cameras. The Dahuas are worth the little extra $, with the higher rez, color rendering and obviously the connection quality is much better than wi-fi. I'd rate the Foscams as a don't buy.

It would be interesting to see what the side by side comparison would look like if you use Foscam's 720p H.264 version of the product

Thanks, I was not aware of that one. Model # is FI9821W and available on Amazon for $127.

At that price, if it performs reasonably and works with some 3rd parties, it could be interesting.

I just ordered one. Derek can do a quick test on it.

Brandon, It looks as if your conclusion is made basing connectivity going from wireless to wired.

Stating: "obviously the connection quality is much better than wi-fi".

Did you not know that the fi8910w is wired also?

http://foscam.us/foscam-fi8910w-wireless-ip-camera.html

Of the three small images in the above link. Clicking on the center one clearly shows the back having wired connectivity. Including yellow and green LAN LEDs built into the RJ45. Plus seperate red LED (power light) and green LED (Network light).

I have several. ALL wired. They work well for me. Even with a latency when viewing over the Internet.

There seems to be a lot more information supporting it as a useful camera.

Example: "In addition, it is smartphone compatible (Iphone, Android & Blackberry) as well as viewable over the internet using standard web-browsers."

Having twice purchased my fi8910w's direct from Foscam I recieve email offering same and similar nodels at reduced prices.

I've had others including Panosonic (P/T), one still in use, and DLink (static), now disconnected.

I accept that the Foscam's we are discussing are VGA resolution and Wi-Fi and ethernet, and all things being equal, my biggest issue with the VGA Foscam's are their poor color rendering even in well-lit scenes.

You should really try a test on the VSTARCAM T7838WIP model, is the same price as the foscam published but quality of images are much better.

Jorge, thanks. I can't find it for sale online and the brand is not well known, two things that make a test less interesting.

I am not a 'fan' of Foscam in any way but it is an offering that is widely known and commonly purchased, making a test of greater utility to more members.

Hi Derek,

“Otherwise, for just $50 to $100 more, you can get many higher quality, lower storage cost, easier to access cameras.”

I would be very interested to know the make / model of some of the pan tilt alternatives you allude to in your recommendations. Both the Dahua and Acti used in the comparison are fixed cameras, not pan tilt units.

I would like to know of a Foscam “beater” that is within $100 of the Foscam price. Prefebarly something that can compete with the Foscam FI9821W Indoor Pan/Tilt H.264 720p Wireless IP Camera and within $100 of the Foscam price.

Thanking you and Happy New Year,

Jim

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
Managed Video Services UL 827B Examined on Jan 09, 2019
Historically, UL listings for central stations have been important, with UL 827 having widespread support. However, few central stations have...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...
Surveillance Codec Guide on Jan 03, 2019
Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
Intersec 2019 Live Day 1 - Massive China Presence on Jan 21, 2019
There’s a massive presence from Chinese or China-focused video surveillance firms, chiefly Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, and Infinova, at...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact