Testing Pelco's Sarix Megapixel Cameras (IXE20DN)

Author: John Honovich, Published on Dec 05, 2009

While Pelco is a leader in analog surveillance cameras, they are not even in the top 10 for 2008 global network camera sales. Pelco aims to rectify this with their Sarix family of IP cameras supporting both megapixel resolution and H.264 processing.

We tested a Pelco IXE20DN (firmware version 1.3.7.9081-A1.3199) using Milestone Enterprise's 6.5f software with Device Pack 4.5. The test was conducted using H.264 resolution at 30fps. The test included filming indoors and outdoors during the daytime, night time and under measured low lux scenarios. We also tested at multiple bit rates to examine the impact of adjusting bandwidth consumption.

Our key findings include:

  • Day time video quality had sharp focus and fairly true to life colors
  • Low light (under 1 lux) video tended to be dark with minimal motion blur and low visible noise (using default settings)
  • Integration of Sarix and Milestone was unstable, suffering from various problems
  • Limitation of supporting 3rd party VMS systems can block use
  • Relatively high H.264 bandwidth consumption with 3rd party systems should be considered
Compare to our other megapixel camera tests including: Axis Q1755, Arecont Vision 3105, Basler's 1.3/2MP cameras, Sanyo VCC-HD4000Stardot SD500BN, and Vivotek IP7161.

Product Overview

The Sarix IX line of 'box cameras' support the following key features:

  • H.264 encoding, 1080p resolution at 30fps (prior to the current firmware version, the maximum frame rate was 15fps for 1080p)
  • Auto-focus capability triggered by physical button on side of camera and through web interface
  • Support for baseline, main and high profile H.264 encoding (with baseline being the least bit rate efficient and high being the most - see overview). Use of these profiles depends on VMS support.
  • Defaults: Maximum exposure setting of 1/30s during the day and 1/8.3s during the night.
  • CBR only streaming (no VBR) with default bit rate of 6.5Mb/s for H.264 baseline, 30fps, 1080p
  • Note: The lens is sold separately from the camera. For this test, we used the Pelco 13M  2.8-8mm Auto-iris lens.
  • The IXE20 series offers multiple models supporting both ObjectVideo's analytics and Pelco's own analytics.
For full details, review the product datasheet and the installation/operation manual.

Pricing

The IXE20DN, the 2 Megapixel Day/night version with no analytics is available on-line for about $1200 USD. The Pelco 13M 2.8-8mm lens is available on-line for approximately $130 USD.

Image Quality

Below is our screencast commenting and showing Sarix's image quality.  More importantly, is a ZIP package of video clips for you to review yourself.

Download the package of Sarix test video clips and image snapshots (266 MB total).

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

In general, we though the video quality was solid both day and night. What stood out was that night time performance was achieved using the defaults. By contrast, some cameras were quite poor in low light (like Sanyo) or defaulted to an unrealistic 1 second exposure time (like Basler) which transformed moving objects into 'ghosts'.

Watch the screencast examining video quality:

Physical Setup

From a physical perspective, the camera offers a modest number of features including auto-focus, service jack for analog video/servicing and an SD card slot. Note: the auto-focus on the camera only performs a 'quick focus'. The 'full focus' functionality, important for cameras that are significantly out of focus must be performed from the web interface.

The screencast below overviews the physical elements of the Sarix IX camera:

Software Configuration

The screencast below describes the general software configuration process:

The key software challenge we had was integrating the Sarix camera with Milestone's VMS software [Note: We did not test this with Pelco's NVR/VMS systems. 3rd party VMS support is limited currently with Genetec being the only other option recommended by Pelco].

We spent over 8 hours troubleshooting this with multiple phone calls to both Pelco and Milestone technical support. They were unable to resolve.

We were able to establish a fully functional connection for multiple times during the two week testing period. However, periodically, video stopped displaying. [This happened with the VMS running on multiple machines and with the Sarix camera reset to factory defaults].

One issue we suspect is impacting integration and video display is Sarix's current requirement to use an old version of Quicktime (7.5.5). According to Pelco, Quicktime's most recent release caused problems with video decoding. For instance, when we first started our test, we could not see any H.264 video until we 'rolled back' our Quicktime version. Quicktime, by default, automatically attempts to upgrade to the most recent version. This may have been a factor.

Bandwidth Consumption

Bandwidth consumption is a key consideration for the use of Sarix's cameras. While Sarix supports multiple H.264 CODEC profiles (baseline, main, high), Milestone only supports baseline for Sarix cameras (which is similar to the profile used in other H.264 cameras). Significant bandwidth savings may be possible by using main or high profiles. However, these may only be available through Pelco's own VMS systems.

A key practical matter is selecting the target bit rate for the CBR stream. When configuring using the web browser, Pelco offers a range of acceptable bit rates. For H.264, 30fps, baseline encoding, the lowest rate in the range is 2.488 Mb/s and 6.5 Mb/s was the default.

Pelco does not support a quality scale that allows you to adjust encoding quality. In our tests, we found that setting lower bit rates acted as modest quality scale but nowhere near as extreme as we thought would occur.

We tested at both 2.5 Mb/s and 6.5 Mb/s to examine variance in image quality. At 2.5Mb/s , most of the videos were as clear and fluid as the 6.5 Mb/s videos. There were a few exceptions: (1) the daytime indoor video at 6.5Mb/s showed slightly more details than the 2.5Mb/s. (2) A few of the low light/night time videos, though set at 2.5Mb/s, streamed at closer to 5Mb/s.

I recommend that integrators carefully consider the bit rate to use.  It is likely that the bit rate can be set significantly lower than the defaults, resulting in much lower bandwidth consumption.

Camera Comparison

Contrasting the Sarix to Axis' Q1755 and the Arecont Vision AV2105 can illuminate tradeoffs. While there are many H.264 megapixel cameras, these 2 represent relative highs and lows for on--line pricing with the the Q1755 at about $1400 (lens included) and the AV2105DN at about $650 (without lens). With lens, the AV2105 will be about $750-$800 and the Sarix IXE20DN will be about $1350.

Contrasting Axis Q1755 and Sarix IXE20DN

Prices are similar. However, Axis has much broader 3rd party support and a built-in 10x optical zoom that not only provides auto-focusing but simple adjustment of the FoV. Axis supports VBR with much more bandwidth consumption during the day and similar consumption during the night.

Contrasting AV2105DN and Sarix IXE20DN

Pelco is $500-$600 more expensive than Arecont. Pelco does provide a setup jack and auto-focusing providing easier setup and potentially sharper video over the long term than the Arecont Vision. On the other hand, Arecont's H.264 cameras have much broader 3rd party support than Pelco's. Arecont supports VBR which provides much lower daytime/low motion bandwidth consumption but much higher consumption for low light and night time.

Image Quality Comparisons

While we have tested each camera individually, we have not tested them at the same time in the same scenes. As such, while image quality is key, we cannot offer an educated opinion at this time.

5 reports cite this report:

Pelco - A Decade of Decline on May 16, 2016
Pelco's 2007 acquisition for $1.5 billion USD remains one of the largest video surveillance deals ever, even including the industry's recent wave...
Pelco's Sarix Competitive Price/Positioning Examined on Sep 07, 2011
Pelco entered the megapixel market moderately late and with a relatively limited lineup. Now, with the release of their WDR / low light optimized...
Megapixel Camera Comparison 2010 on Feb 22, 2010
Megapixel cameras are clearly 'hot' - the fastest growing segment in the industry for multiple years now. Which should you use? What makes one...
Top 5 Reasons Analog Cameras are Easier to Install than IP on Jan 15, 2010
While IP has many advantages over analog, ease of installation is not one of them. IP cameras are far harder to install even if the installer has...
Examining Pelco Sarix Megapixel Cameras on Mar 03, 2009
While Pelco is the largest analog camera supplier, its existing IP offering have been limited and sales modest. In an effort to close that...

Related Reports

Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...
Drops Dahua, Fenner Becomes ISS CMO on Jul 09, 2018
Hired to improve Dahua's miserable marketing just last year, Janet Fenner has quit Dahua, joining VMS manufacturer ISS as Chief Marketing...
UK VSaaS Startup Ocucon on Jul 03, 2018
Decreasing exposure to fraudulent slip-and-fall insurance claims and lawsuits is one of the oldest selling points of video surveillance for retail....
Digital Watchdog Low Cost 4MP Camera Tested on Jul 02, 2018
Based on member 4MP testing requests, we bought and tested Digital Watchdog's low-cost 4MP DWC-MTT4Wi to see how it performs in real world scenes,...
Panoramic Fisheye Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek on Jun 27, 2018
IPVM tested Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek 12MP panoramic fisheye cameras head to head, as shown in the test setup...
Snap Surveillance Profile on Jun 26, 2018
There are not a lot of video surveillance companies that survive 9 years with only one feature that makes their product stand out. In the case of...
OpenEye Apex VMS Tested on Jun 26, 2018
OpenEye is a US company, founded nearly 20 years ago. In the past few years, OpenEye has been one of a few VMS providers that have pivoted to being...

Most Recent Industry Reports

AI Startup Anyvision Raises $28 Million Led By Bosch on Jul 20, 2018
Anyvision is the most ambitious heavy-spending video surveillance startup in many years. And, now, the startup has raised $28 million led by...
Fail: Dahua "Didn't Check The Lux Levels but It Was Dark" on Jul 20, 2018
Dahua UK has been promoting their camera quality on LinkedIn: I, and others, asked what the lux level of the scene was. (background: Lux Rating...
Free 100+ Manufacturer-Customized Camera Calculator Released on Jul 19, 2018
Now, any manufacturer has a customized IPVM Camera Calculator, free. The goal is to make it easier for companies to help their customers better...
Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
Last Chance - Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 19, 2018
Today is the last day to register. Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security...
Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact