Testing Polarizing Filters on HD Cameras

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on May 30, 2014

Sun glare is particularly challenging for surveillance cameras. Even top cameras struggle with such conditions.

One technique suggested is using polarizing filters. Simply put, these filters pass certain polarizations of light, while blocking others, reducing sun glare at specific angles.

To test how polarizers worked in real world scenarios, we tested 720p cameras in three configurations:

  • Auto-iris lens with polarizing filter
  • Auto-iris lens, no filter
  • P-iris lens, no filter

We tested these three cameras outdoors on a bright, sunny day, to see how the polarizing filter impacts performance.

*** ***** ** ************ *********** *** ************ *******. **** *** cameras ******** **** **** **********.

*** ********* ********* ** *************** *******. ****** ***, ***** ******* **** ******* ************* ** *****, while ******** ******, ******** *** ***** ** ******** ******.

** **** *** ********** ****** ** **** ***** *********, ** tested **** ******* ** ***** **************:

  • ****-**** **** **** ********** ******
  • ****-**** ****, ** ******
  • *-**** ****, ** ******

** ****** ***** ***** ******* ******** ** * ******, ***** day, ** *** *** *** ********** ****** ******* ***********.

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** ******** **** **** ****:

  • ******** ******* ********** ******* *** ****** *** ***** ************* ******** to ********** *-**** *** ** **** **** ******, **** *** ability ** *** ******** ******* ***** ********* ******** ** ***** and **********.
  • ***** ******* ** ***** ** ********* ****** ****** ************* *** to *** ****** ************* ****** ** *** ******.
  • *** ***** *********** *** ********** ******** **** *** ****** **, with ****** ********* ******.
  • *-**** ****** ******* * ******** *********** ** ********** **** ******** DC **** **** ******, *** ***** *** ********** ** ***** a *********** *****.

***************

********** ******* *** ********** **** ** ****** ** ********* *** glare ** ******* ******. *******, ****** ********* *** ***** ** incidence **** ** ** ********* ********** ** **** *** ** be ****, ** ************ **** **** ****** ***** **** ****** angles, *** *** ****** *****. ******* ****** ** ****** **** this ** *************, ** ********* ***** ********** ****** *** **** likely ** ***** ** ******* *** ************* ** *** ******.

Filter ******** *****

***** *** *** ****** ***** ** ****** ****** *********:

**** ****:**** **** ** ***** ******** ** *** ***** ** * standard **** *** * **** ******* **** *** ******. **** ring ****** *** ******* *** ********* **
******** ***** ** ********** ********* ******. ***** *** ****** ** mounted ** *** ***** ** *** **** *** ** *********** a **** ***** ** *****, ***** ** *** **** ******* nearly *********. ******* ****** **** *****$** ** $** ****** ***** ****** ** ** ***** ******, *** *** *** over$*** *** ****** *********** ** ***********.

*-*****:*-***** ******* *** ** ******* ******* *** **** *** ****** with * ******** **** ***** ** ** ***** *** ******. This ****** *** **** ********** ******* **** **** ****** ** the ****** ***** ****** ** ******* ** ************. *******, ***** these ******** *** ******** ******* *** **** *** ******, ***** is ********. *-***** ******** **** *** *****$***+ ******, *** ********* *** ******, ********* ******* $**-***, ****** *** a **** ********* ******* *******.

Filter *****

** **** * **** **** ****** **** ******* ******* ******* in **** ****. ** **** ***** ** **** *** *** filter ** *********, **** * ******** **** ******* ** *** lens:

********** *********

** **** ***** ** **** *** ** ******** ***** *** filter *** ***** *********, *** **** ***** ******. ** **** example, ** *** **** ** ****** ***** ** ****** *** windshield ** **** ******* ** *** ***, *** *** ****. Because ** ****, ***** **** ******** ******* ****** ** ********* considered *** **** *************.

Vehicle *****

*********** *** ******* ** **** *** *****-***** ** *** *******, the ********** ** *** *** ******** ******** *** *** ** the *** **** ******, **** *** *** ****** ********* ****** the **** ** *** *****. *** ****** **** *** ********* filter *** *** *** ******** **** ****, ***** *****, *** facial *********,***** *** ***** *** ******* **** *** *** ***** ** the *** *** ********** ** *** *** *** *** **********.

****, ** ***** ** * ******* **** ** *** ***, with *********** ********** *****. ***** *** ********** ******, ********** ***** is ****** ********** *** ** *** ******* *** *** ******* in *** ***. *** ********** *******, **** ******** *** *-****, are ****** ** *** ***, ****** *** *-**** **** ** marginally ******.

*** ***** ******

** ****** *** ********** ****** ** ***** ** *** **** impact, ** ***, ** *** ** *** ***** ***********. ** a *** ***** *****, ***** * ***, *** ***** ** noticeably ****** **** *** ****** ********, **** ** **** ******** shot **** *** ******* ** *** ***:

*******, ********* *********** *** *****, **** ** *** ***** *****. While *** ***** ** ******** ******, ** ** ** **** legible **** *** ********** ****** **, *** ******* ** *** subject *** *******.

Test ***********

*** ******* **** ****** ***** */*** *** ******* ** ** FPS **** ************ ~** *******. *** ***** ******** **** **** default.

******* **** ** **** **** *** ***** ******* ******** *******:

  • ********* ****: ***** ***-****, ******** *.**
  • ******** ****: ***** ***-****, ******** *.**
  • *-**** ****: ******* ***-****, ******** *.*********

Comments (17)

It is not clear as to what would be the effect with the passage of time. If one fixed the polarizing filter in the morning to eliminate glare from a scene when the angle of incidence of the light would be say A, what would be the effect in the late afternoon, when the angle of incidence would be say B which may be as much as 90 deg. different from A. I suspect that the polarizing filter would need to be re-adjusted. This would grossly limit the usability of the filter in practical surveillance CCTV applications.

...in the morning to eliminate glare from a scene when the angle of incidence of the light would be say A, what would be the effect in the late afternoon...

Remember, this is not for doing a little back light compensation, IMO its best used for rather moderate to severe glare. Like the kind that causes such sensory sensor overload (AKA blooming), that WDR can't even fix it.

I don't doubt that you can come up with some scenarios where you have extreme morning glare and extreme late afternoon glare in the same static FOV, but typically its one or the other and then only for maybe a couple of hours once a day... What have you seen?

But, if the situation is that demanding, then maybe the camera can be angled down or out more, or maybe if Ethan has another filter lying around we could see what two partially out of phase ones do..(or if in NYC, I've heard certain Chinese takeout menus can be used as a glare hood :)

"I suspect that the polarizing filter would need to be re-adjusted."

Jayant, Good feedback.

I think the other thing that might be an issue, even if all you were interested in was dealing with just afternoon sun, e.g., is that the position of the setting and rising sun varies throughout the year. There's a map / calculator that shows that.

For example, here is what it is on January 31st for NYC:

And here is what it is today, May 31st:

I am not positive how this would impact it, and it's, by definition, not quick to test this, but theoretically if the angle of impact of the sun's glare shifted significantly, it would seem to undermine the glare reduction of the set polarized filter.

Just to be clear I wasn't saying Jayant couldn't be right, I just couldn't think of a typical situation where he would be... Do any come to mind? Maybe a lake scene where the sun is tracking, left to right across the sky?

Have you considered trying out one of these filters on your LPC shootout, talk about glare! It would have to do something, right?

The lake is certainly one possibility. Here is another more likely scenario. Just visualise an east-west row of cars facing north-south in a parking lot and the camera somewhere in the middle between 50 and 100 yards to the north or south. As the sun passes overhead, the windscreens of the cars would reflect the sunlight into the camera from different angles throughout the day.

As the sun passes overhead, the windscreens of the cars would reflect the sunlight into the camera from different angles throughout the day.

Again, I agree in theory, but I am not sure this disparity in angles would be enough to cause any concern, and even if it did somtimes occur, I don't think it would occur enough to

...grossly limit the usability of the filter in practical surveillance CCTV applications. (EA)

Which is a fairly strong knock against the filters, don't you think?

Here are the assumptions I'm using, let me know if you object:

1. Camera is a fixed box type with interchangable lenses/filters, with a horizontal view angle of less < 90.

2. Camera has a tilt angle of < 0

3. Glare, in this sense means unwanted light which causes excessive image degradation and severe over-exposure (so that 'even top cameras struggle')

Returning to your example of a camera pointed north-south, the difficulty lies in the fact that the sun itself is always more than 90 degrees off axis, therefore the total amount of reflected light itself, although the angle of the light is changing, never amounts to enough to warrant a filter. But, If you then point the camera to the east or west more, the glare will of course increase to the point of needing a filter, but only in that direction...

Glare, IMO, happens the most when the camera is slightly off axis to the sun, i.e. sunrise and sundown, and you can't have a camera pointed at both at the sametime without a wide angle lens (or a curved vertical mirror on the horizon, ski slope maybe?).

There's a lot of IPVM member controlled cameras out there, so its just a matter of time before somebody gives a convincing, real counter example. But the filters are probably effective in most cases, yes/no?

I have already posted a reply but on account of a power blink while submitting it, it may not have gone through. If it did go through, please ignore/delete this and accept my apologies for the inconvenience.

The reply:

I accept your three assumptions, but beyond that, both of us are making assumptions as to the actual impact. It would enlighten all of us if Ethan or some other IPVM member could give us feedback based on actual tests.

My reason for stating that the usability would be "grossly" limited is based on the assumption that if your surveillance is severely compromised for several hours a day for several days, then that surveillance cannot be relied upon and an alternate solution needs to be found.

...but beyond that, both of us are making assumptions as to the actual impact...

Here's the good news, we don't need no stinkin' filters!

Why not? Because I will concede to you that every scene, conformant to the agreed assumptions, which exhibits glare in the 'morning' and then again in the 'late afternoon' could very well be 'grossly limited', regardless of whether a filter is used or not...

So if you have access to any camera with a standard angle lens and the Sun is nearby, you might be be able come-up with a real-world candidate geometry that could be tested with filters.

But if we don't know of an actual double-time glare test case without filters, then what should we ask Ethan to test with filters? Surely we don't just want him to test a scene that actually has glare only once a day, do we?

P.S. I quickly tried the camera north-south east-west thing with only ten cars but I had a hard time getting any glare with the camera pointing 90 degrees off axis from the sun. I admit I would have tried a lot harder if I thought it was likely to get double glare in the first place, and so I am guilty of 1st degree confirmation bias. You might do a lot better, depending on your lattitude...(Reykjavic?)

You show the impact at night, but what is the impact on the image during the day when there isn't a situation that requires the filter?

Where can you buy this polarized filter?

Wow, I was just thinking about this post when Ericson replied to it.Thanks, Eric. I was able to see this first hand when my girlfriend commented on some fancy seats inside a car as we walked by. I told her I could not see the seats because of the glare. She could see them because she was wearing polarized Oakley sunglasses. Pretty neat.

Does anyone have information on where slip-ring mounts that will fit typical IP camera lenses can be purchased?

any idea where I can buy those sliprings?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Genetec Privacy Protector Tested on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...
Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...
Axxon Face Search Tested on Oct 26, 2018
AxxonSoft has brought facial recognition to their Axxon Next VMS for free with the simply named Face Search, claiming to allow users to find...
Hanwha Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (PNM-7000VD) on Oct 18, 2018
Hanwha has introduced their first dual-imager model, the PNM-7000VD, a twin 1080p model featuring independently positionable sensors and a snap-in...
Dahua Face Recognition Camera Tested on Oct 15, 2018
Dahua has been one of the industry's most vocal proponents of the value that AI creates: As part of this, Dahua has released a facial...
Last Chance - October 2018 Camera Course on Oct 04, 2018
Today is the last day to register for the October 2018 Camera Course, register now. This is the only independent surveillance camera course,...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Axis First IR PTZ Tested (Q6125-LE) on Aug 21, 2018
Axis is very late in releasing IR PTZs. While competitors such as Hikvision and Dahua have offered them for years, Axis has just released their...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Aug 09, 2018
A camera's focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can cause important problems. In this guide, we explain focus issues and proper...
Hikvision PanoVu Mini Tested (Multi-imager + PTZ For ~$500) on Aug 07, 2018
Hikvision has released their first PanoVu Mini multi imager, the PanoVu DS-2PT3326IZ-DE3, with four 1080p imagers, including a PTZ and integrated...

Most Recent Industry Reports

'Sticker' Surveillance Camera Developed (CSEM Witness) on Nov 16, 2018
The Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM) has announced what it calls the: world’s first fully autonomous camera that can be...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Final Report on Nov 16, 2018
This is our second (updated) and final show report from ISC East. ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed...
Facial Detection Tested on Nov 16, 2018
Facial detection and recognition are increasingly offered by video surveillance manufacturers. Facial detection detects faces in an image/video...
Throughtek P2P/Cloud Solution Profile on Nov 15, 2018
Many IoT manufacturers either do not have the capabilities or the interest to develop their own cloud management software for their devices....
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...
Integrator Credit Card Alternative Divvy on Nov 13, 2018
Most security integrators are small businesses but large enough that they have various employees that need to be able to expense various charges as...
Directory of Video Intercoms on Nov 13, 2018
Video Intercoms, also known as Video Door-Phones or Video Entry Systems, have been growing in the past decade as more and more IP camera...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested) on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact