Testing Polarizing Filters on HD Cameras

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on May 30, 2014

Sun glare is particularly challenging for surveillance cameras. Even top cameras struggle with such conditions.

One technique suggested is using polarizing filters. Simply put, these filters pass certain polarizations of light, while blocking others, reducing sun glare at specific angles.

To test how polarizers worked in real world scenarios, we tested 720p cameras in three configurations:

  • Auto-iris lens with polarizing filter
  • Auto-iris lens, no filter
  • P-iris lens, no filter

We tested these three cameras outdoors on a bright, sunny day, to see how the polarizing filter impacts performance.

*** ***** ** ************ *********** *** ************ *******. **** *** cameras ******** **** **** **********.

*** ********* ********* ** *************** *******. ****** ***, ***** ******* **** ******* ************* ** *****, while ******** ******, ******** *** ***** ** ******** ******.

** **** *** ********** ****** ** **** ***** *********, ** tested **** ******* ** ***** **************:

  • ****-**** **** **** ********** ******
  • ****-**** ****, ** ******
  • *-**** ****, ** ******

** ****** ***** ***** ******* ******** ** * ******, ***** day, ** *** *** *** ********** ****** ******* ***********.

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** ******** **** **** ****:

  • ******** ******* ********** ******* *** ****** *** ***** ************* ******** to ********** *-**** *** ** **** **** ******, **** *** ability ** *** ******** ******* ***** ********* ******** ** ***** and **********.
  • ***** ******* ** ***** ** ********* ****** ****** ************* *** to *** ****** ************* ****** ** *** ******.
  • *** ***** *********** *** ********** ******** **** *** ****** **, with ****** ********* ******.
  • *-**** ****** ******* * ******** *********** ** ********** **** ******** DC **** **** ******, *** ***** *** ********** ** ***** a *********** *****.

***************

********** ******* *** ********** **** ** ****** ** ********* *** glare ** ******* ******. *******, ****** ********* *** ***** ** incidence **** ** ** ********* ********** ** **** *** ** be ****, ** ************ **** **** ****** ***** **** ****** angles, *** *** ****** *****. ******* ****** ** ****** **** this ** *************, ** ********* ***** ********** ****** *** **** likely ** ***** ** ******* *** ************* ** *** ******.

Filter ******** *****

***** *** *** ****** ***** ** ****** ****** *********:

**** ****:**** **** ** ***** ******** ** *** ***** ** * standard **** *** * **** ******* **** *** ******. **** ring ****** *** ******* *** ********* **
******** ***** ** ********** ********* ******. ***** *** ****** ** mounted ** *** ***** ** *** **** *** ** *********** a **** ***** ** *****, ***** ** *** **** ******* nearly *********. ******* ****** **** *****$** ** $** ****** ***** ****** ** ** ***** ******, *** *** *** over$*** *** ****** *********** ** ***********.

*-*****:*-***** ******* *** ** ******* ******* *** **** *** ****** with * ******** **** ***** ** ** ***** *** ******. This ****** *** **** ********** ******* **** **** ****** ** the ****** ***** ****** ** ******* ** ************. *******, ***** these ******** *** ******** ******* *** **** *** ******, ***** is ********. *-***** ******** **** *** *****$***+ ******, *** ********* *** ******, ********* ******* $**-***, ****** *** a **** ********* ******* *******.

Filter *****

** **** * **** **** ****** **** ******* ******* ******* in **** ****. ** **** ***** ** **** *** *** filter ** *********, **** * ******** **** ******* ** *** lens:

********** *********

** **** ***** ** **** *** ** ******** ***** *** filter *** ***** *********, *** **** ***** ******. ** **** example, ** *** **** ** ****** ***** ** ****** *** windshield ** **** ******* ** *** ***, *** *** ****. Because ** ****, ***** **** ******** ******* ****** ** ********* considered *** **** *************.

Vehicle *****

*********** *** ******* ** **** *** *****-***** ** *** *******, the ********** ** *** *** ******** ******** *** *** ** the *** **** ******, **** *** *** ****** ********* ****** the **** ** *** *****. *** ****** **** *** ********* filter *** *** *** ******** **** ****, ***** *****, *** facial *********,***** *** ***** *** ******* **** *** *** ***** ** the *** *** ********** ** *** *** *** *** **********.

****, ** ***** ** * ******* **** ** *** ***, with *********** ********** *****. ***** *** ********** ******, ********** ***** is ****** ********** *** ** *** ******* *** *** ******* in *** ***. *** ********** *******, **** ******** *** *-****, are ****** ** *** ***, ****** *** *-**** **** ** marginally ******.

*** ***** ******

** ****** *** ********** ****** ** ***** ** *** **** impact, ** ***, ** *** ** *** ***** ***********. ** a *** ***** *****, ***** * ***, *** ***** ** noticeably ****** **** *** ****** ********, **** ** **** ******** shot **** *** ******* ** *** ***:

*******, ********* *********** *** *****, **** ** *** ***** *****. While *** ***** ** ******** ******, ** ** ** **** legible **** *** ********** ****** **, *** ******* ** *** subject *** *******.

Test ***********

*** ******* **** ****** ***** */*** *** ******* ** ** FPS **** ************ ~** *******. *** ***** ******** **** **** default.

******* **** ** **** **** *** ***** ******* ******** *******:

  • ********* ****: ***** ***-****, ******** *.**
  • ******** ****: ***** ***-****, ******** *.**
  • *-**** ****: ******* ***-****, ******** *.*********

Comments (17)

It is not clear as to what would be the effect with the passage of time. If one fixed the polarizing filter in the morning to eliminate glare from a scene when the angle of incidence of the light would be say A, what would be the effect in the late afternoon, when the angle of incidence would be say B which may be as much as 90 deg. different from A. I suspect that the polarizing filter would need to be re-adjusted. This would grossly limit the usability of the filter in practical surveillance CCTV applications.

...in the morning to eliminate glare from a scene when the angle of incidence of the light would be say A, what would be the effect in the late afternoon...

Remember, this is not for doing a little back light compensation, IMO its best used for rather moderate to severe glare. Like the kind that causes such sensory sensor overload (AKA blooming), that WDR can't even fix it.

I don't doubt that you can come up with some scenarios where you have extreme morning glare and extreme late afternoon glare in the same static FOV, but typically its one or the other and then only for maybe a couple of hours once a day... What have you seen?

But, if the situation is that demanding, then maybe the camera can be angled down or out more, or maybe if Ethan has another filter lying around we could see what two partially out of phase ones do..(or if in NYC, I've heard certain Chinese takeout menus can be used as a glare hood :)

"I suspect that the polarizing filter would need to be re-adjusted."

Jayant, Good feedback.

I think the other thing that might be an issue, even if all you were interested in was dealing with just afternoon sun, e.g., is that the position of the setting and rising sun varies throughout the year. There's a map / calculator that shows that.

For example, here is what it is on January 31st for NYC:

And here is what it is today, May 31st:

I am not positive how this would impact it, and it's, by definition, not quick to test this, but theoretically if the angle of impact of the sun's glare shifted significantly, it would seem to undermine the glare reduction of the set polarized filter.

Just to be clear I wasn't saying Jayant couldn't be right, I just couldn't think of a typical situation where he would be... Do any come to mind? Maybe a lake scene where the sun is tracking, left to right across the sky?

Have you considered trying out one of these filters on your LPC shootout, talk about glare! It would have to do something, right?

The lake is certainly one possibility. Here is another more likely scenario. Just visualise an east-west row of cars facing north-south in a parking lot and the camera somewhere in the middle between 50 and 100 yards to the north or south. As the sun passes overhead, the windscreens of the cars would reflect the sunlight into the camera from different angles throughout the day.

As the sun passes overhead, the windscreens of the cars would reflect the sunlight into the camera from different angles throughout the day.

Again, I agree in theory, but I am not sure this disparity in angles would be enough to cause any concern, and even if it did somtimes occur, I don't think it would occur enough to

...grossly limit the usability of the filter in practical surveillance CCTV applications. (EA)

Which is a fairly strong knock against the filters, don't you think?

Here are the assumptions I'm using, let me know if you object:

1. Camera is a fixed box type with interchangable lenses/filters, with a horizontal view angle of less < 90.

2. Camera has a tilt angle of < 0

3. Glare, in this sense means unwanted light which causes excessive image degradation and severe over-exposure (so that 'even top cameras struggle')

Returning to your example of a camera pointed north-south, the difficulty lies in the fact that the sun itself is always more than 90 degrees off axis, therefore the total amount of reflected light itself, although the angle of the light is changing, never amounts to enough to warrant a filter. But, If you then point the camera to the east or west more, the glare will of course increase to the point of needing a filter, but only in that direction...

Glare, IMO, happens the most when the camera is slightly off axis to the sun, i.e. sunrise and sundown, and you can't have a camera pointed at both at the sametime without a wide angle lens (or a curved vertical mirror on the horizon, ski slope maybe?).

There's a lot of IPVM member controlled cameras out there, so its just a matter of time before somebody gives a convincing, real counter example. But the filters are probably effective in most cases, yes/no?

I have already posted a reply but on account of a power blink while submitting it, it may not have gone through. If it did go through, please ignore/delete this and accept my apologies for the inconvenience.

The reply:

I accept your three assumptions, but beyond that, both of us are making assumptions as to the actual impact. It would enlighten all of us if Ethan or some other IPVM member could give us feedback based on actual tests.

My reason for stating that the usability would be "grossly" limited is based on the assumption that if your surveillance is severely compromised for several hours a day for several days, then that surveillance cannot be relied upon and an alternate solution needs to be found.

...but beyond that, both of us are making assumptions as to the actual impact...

Here's the good news, we don't need no stinkin' filters!

Why not? Because I will concede to you that every scene, conformant to the agreed assumptions, which exhibits glare in the 'morning' and then again in the 'late afternoon' could very well be 'grossly limited', regardless of whether a filter is used or not...

So if you have access to any camera with a standard angle lens and the Sun is nearby, you might be be able come-up with a real-world candidate geometry that could be tested with filters.

But if we don't know of an actual double-time glare test case without filters, then what should we ask Ethan to test with filters? Surely we don't just want him to test a scene that actually has glare only once a day, do we?

P.S. I quickly tried the camera north-south east-west thing with only ten cars but I had a hard time getting any glare with the camera pointing 90 degrees off axis from the sun. I admit I would have tried a lot harder if I thought it was likely to get double glare in the first place, and so I am guilty of 1st degree confirmation bias. You might do a lot better, depending on your lattitude...(Reykjavic?)

You show the impact at night, but what is the impact on the image during the day when there isn't a situation that requires the filter?

Where can you buy this polarized filter?

Wow, I was just thinking about this post when Ericson replied to it.Thanks, Eric. I was able to see this first hand when my girlfriend commented on some fancy seats inside a car as we walked by. I told her I could not see the seats because of the glare. She could see them because she was wearing polarized Oakley sunglasses. Pretty neat.

Does anyone have information on where slip-ring mounts that will fit typical IP camera lenses can be purchased?

any idea where I can buy those sliprings?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Panoramic Fisheye Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek on Jun 27, 2018
IPVM tested Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek 12MP panoramic fisheye cameras head to head, as shown in the test setup...
Hikvision 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (DS-2CD63C2F-IV) on Jun 14, 2018
Hikvision's DS-2CD63C2F-IV is their flagship panoramic camera, with a 12MP imager, 15m integrated IR, smart codec, and more. We tested the 63C2 in...
Avigilon H4 Multi-Sensor Adds 32MP, H.265, Analytics on Jun 13, 2018
Avigilon has announced the H4 Multisensor, the successor to their repositionable multi imager line, adding features like H.265, integrated IR,...
Introducing Effective PPF (ePPF) - Improving Video Surveillance Designs on Jun 11, 2018
Pixel density (PPF / PPM) is the best metric the industry has to define and project video quality. It allows simple communication of estimated...
Hanwha Low-Cost 4MP Camera Tested (QNV-7010R) on Jun 11, 2018
4MP usage is increasing noticeably, as IPVM 2018 resolution statistics show. And low-cost, fixed focal cameras, are popular for budget...
Top Features For Easy Camera Installation (Statistics) on Jun 05, 2018
Camera installation is the most fundamental and common task for video security technicians. Because of this, camera manufacturers market their...
Hikvision PanoVu 20MP Flexible Camera Tested on Jun 01, 2018
Hikvision has released their first repositionable multi imager cameras with integrated IR included, atypical in competitors. We bought and tested...
Stats: Upgrading Cameras Far More Common Than Replacing Failed Cameras on May 30, 2018
The old saying "If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It" does not apply here. New IPVM statistics show that 60% of cameras that are replaced still work but...
Oncam 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested on May 29, 2018
Oncam has made their name since the early 2000s as a fisheye specialist, focusing only on panoramic cameras. To see how this specialist stacks up...
Installing Box Cameras Indoors Tutorial on May 22, 2018
This tutorial starts our physical installation for video surveillance series, starting with Box Cameras, one of the oldest and most basic types....

Most Recent Industry Reports

Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 13, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer 2018 This...
US Tariffs Hit China Video Surveillance on Jul 13, 2018
Chinese video surveillance products avoided tariffs for the first two rounds. Now, in the third round, many video surveillance products will be...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...
Hikvision Fights Ban - Claims 'Red Scare', Hires 14 Term Ex-Congressman on Jul 11, 2018
Hikvision is fighting back against the House Bill Ban of their products. Hikvision has hired one of the biggest lobbying firms, led by a 14 term...
Arecont Acquisition By Costar on Jul 11, 2018
Arecont Vision acquisition by Costar Technologies has been approved by the court, concluding the bankruptcy process triggered by Arecont's...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact