Testing Pelco Sarix IL10

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jun 12, 2013

Value / budget cameras are becoming increasingly important for even 'professional' oriented manufacturers and are viewed as a key means to expand IP to the lower end of the market. This spring, Pelco joined this trend with its IL10 series Sarix cameras.

In this report, we share our test results of the IL10 box model, which we matched up against the ACTi D11 and Axis M1114, other 720p budget cameras supporting the same FoV. Here's the cameras side by side:

Here's a preview of the image comparison:

We did a series of comparisons at various light levels and settings to better understand tradeoffs.

***** / ****** ******* *** ******** ************ ********* *** **** 'professional' ******** ************* *** *** ****** ** * *** ***** to ****** ** ** *** ***** *** ** *** ******. This ******, ***** ****** **** ***** **** ******* ****** ***** *******.

** **** ******, ** ***** *** **** ******* ** *** IL10 *** *****, ***** ** ******* ** ******* *** **** *** and **** *****, ***** **** ****** ******* ********** *** **** FoV. ****'* *** ******* **** ** ****:

****'* * ******* ** *** ***** **********:

** *** * ****** ** *********** ** ******* ***** ****** and ******** ** ****** ********** *********.

[***************]

Key ******** 

**** *** *** *** ********:

  • ******* ****** *** **************** ** ***** *** **** ***** **** *******, ******* ******* 1/6.9" ******.
  • *********** ***** ** ******* ** ********** *** *****,~** ***, **** ********* ***** ********* *******.
  • *** ************ ******* **** ******* ** ****, ********* ********* ** * lux, *** **** * ***** ***** ** * *** *** below.
  • **** ******* ******(*/**, ****** ** ** *******) ******* ** ****** ****** ****.
  • *** **** ******** **** ******* ******* *** ****** *************.
  • ******* ********* * **/*, ***** ** *** **** *** **** ************, but **** ***************************. ** ********* ******** **** ** * **/* ** * Mb/s, ********* ** ********* *** ****** ** *** *****.
  • ********** *** *********, ***** *** ** ********** ** ************* *****, but ******* ** **** ******** **********.
  • *****:*** ***** **** ***** ***~$*** ******. *** **** ***** **** ******* **** ****** ** *****, from~$***(******** ******) **~$***+(**** ***-*****), ******* *** **** ** *** ******/**** **** ** **** range.

***************

******** ** ***** *** **** *******, *** **** ******** ****, with ***** *********** ** **** *** ******, *** ******* ** low ***** (**** ****** ** *** *****). *******, ** ** priced $**-*** ***** **** *********************, ********* *** **** *** ** **** **** (~$*** ******). ** *** ***** ****, **** ******* *** **** **** factor *** *** ****** *** **** / ********** ** **** 'mini-box'. *** **** ** ******* ** ******* ***-*****/***** **** ***, *** ******* **** *********.

Physical ********

** **** *****, ** ****** *** ******** ************ ** *** IL10. ***** ****** ********** **** *** *********:

  • ***** *** ********, *** ** *** ****'* **** ***** */*.*" sensor, *** **** ** **** ******* **** **** ******** **** surveillance *******.
  • *** ******'* ** ******* *******, ******* **** *** **** ** a ******** *** ******.
  • ** **** ********** ***** **** ********, **** ** */* ** audio.

Configuration / ****** *** *********

*** *** ********** *********** *** ***** **** *** *********. ***** should **** *** ********* *** ******:

  • ********** *** *********, **** ***** ******* **** ******* ***** *******.
  • */** **** ******* ("*****-***** ******** ** *** *****") ** ******* by *******, ******* *********** ****** ****.
  • *.*** ******** ** *** ****, *** **** *** ***** *** fine ******* ******* ** ***** ********. *******, ***** *** ****** between ********* (**, **, **, ** ** ***) *** ****, medium, *** *** "*******" ***** **** ******* * **/* *** 1 **/* ********. 

Indoor ***********

** * **** *** *****, ******* ***-*** ***, *** **** performs ********** ** *** **** *** ****, ******* *****'* ******* imager. **** *** ************ ** *** **** *****, ***** ******** greater ****** ** *** *******'* ****, *** ******** ****** *********** of *** **** *****, **** ** **** *.

 

*******, ******** *** ***** ***** ** ** ***, ** *** see *** **** ******* ******* ******** ** *** ***** *******, obscuring ******* ** *** ******* *** *****:

 

******** ****** ******* ** * ***, *** **** ** ********** dimmer **** *** ***, ****** **** ******* ************* *** **** level ** ******, ****** *** ********* ****. *** **** ***** still ******** ******* ******* ** *** ******* *** * ****** of ***** ******** ** *** *****, ******* ********** *****.

 

*******, ** * *** *** *****, *** **** ******** *********** no *****, *** **** *** ***. *** ***** ******** ********* at **** *****, *** ****** ******.

Slow ******* ***********

** *******, *** **** ***** *** ******* **** */*** ** 1/5s ** *** *****. ****'** ******* **********, **** ******* ** ******** ******* ******, *** **** ****** of ****** ****.

*** *******, **** ******* ***** *** ** */**, ** ~* lux, *** **** ******** ***** ****** ****** ** *** **** the ***** *** ** */***:

*******, **** **** ** *** ***** ***** * ***, **** using **** *******, *** **** ******** ** *****, ***** *** M1114 ******** *********:

 

*******, ** ** ****** **** ***** **** *******, ****** **** is ******, ********* ****** *** ******* ** *** *******, *** is ******* ******* ** *** *****.

*******, **** ********** ***** *** **** ***** **** */** *** 1/30s ******* ****** *** ********** ******* ***** *** ********:

***** *** ******** ****** ***** ** *** ***** ******* ***/******/********** ***** *** **********.

Bandwidth *** ***********

*** **** **** *** ******** **** *** ****** ***** ** select ******* ******* ** *, *, ** * **/*, **** framerates ** **, **, **, ** **. ******* ** ****, there ** ** *** ** ******** **** ********* ***********, ***** the **** *** **** ******* *** ***. *******, ** ****** each ******* ** * **** ***** ***** * ***** ***** to ****** * **** ****** ** ******, ** ***** ** see *** **** ******* ***********:

** ** ***, ** ***** *** ********* ************************* (** * ***** ** *-**):

  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • **** ***: ~**
  • **** *****: ~**

***** ** ****, ** **** ****** ******, ** ** ***, 1 **/* ** *** ***********, ******** *** **** ***********, ***** 5 **/* ** ********, **** * *********** ***** **** ***** others ******* **** ******* ******** ** *******.

*******, ** ****** *** **** ***** * * **/* ****** at ** *** ** *** **** **** ****** *****, *** quantization ******* ** ~** *******. ********* ************ ******* *** **** ********* ** *****, ***** *** ****** **** ***** **** ******* ** ******* scenes.

Comments (28)

What's the market for these super economical cameras? The are almost getting cheaper than a camera connection license for an upper tier VMS.

I think there's a big market, specifically for people who don't want to pay for an upper tier VMS license ;)

~$200 and less cameras are going to become more common (even Axis has a half dozen in that range now). Plus VMS licensing costs have been going down for a while as well!

There will be still those who value $1000 IP cameras and $300 VMS licenses but those will, statistically be, the elite.

True. I might be a little handicapped as I mainly deal with larger systems. I haven't seen much downward movement in camera connection licensing prices from the bigger VMS players.

What are users typically connecting these types of economical cameras to? NVR's? Alarm Systems? Hosted video? I would assume Axis' low cost cameras are marketed in conjunction with their free Axis Camera Companion software. Milestone has a free VMS download for small camera installations but the features are somewhat limited. Are Pelco or other manufacturers coming out with a similar freebie basic VMS offerings? What low per camera cost VMS'es are good candidates for these type cameras?

It doesn't make sense to connect a $150-200 camera to a VMS platform that costs $150-200 per camera connection license so I wouldn't expect to see many of these cameras connected to the bigger name VMS platforms. Maybe the lower cost cmaeras will drive license prices down.

I'm guessing the goals/markets for these cameras are: Substitute for analog. Smaller systems market. More coverage for the buck. A market response to Ubiquiti and ACTI. I just hope it doesn't become a race to the bottom and further commoditize the IP camera market.

On the enterprise / large system level, the downward movement is typically negotiated (i.e., the MSRP is $250 but we'll give a 55% discount for this 500 camera deal we want, etc.). However, Milestone's new Interconnect offering clearly and structurally reduces price.

As for what to connect a $200 camera to...

As you mentioned, there are free VMS versions offered by the camera manufacturer as well as a number from third parties. Beyond that, there are now a number of ~$50 VMS versions even from bigger manufacturers - Milestone Essential, Exacq Start, etc.

I don't think it will be a race to the bottom. It will simply mean that higher end cameras will need to continue to innovate with advanced features - auto focusing, smart integrated IR, improved WDR, higher resolution, panoramic imaging, multi-imagers, video analytics, etc. However, generic HD cameras are certainly being commoditized.

I think that manufacturers should focus on low light performance at higher MP for the high end and they will be able to keep the high end prices they want. I don't see that being a challenge from the low end market for quite some time.

Pelco does offer a free VMS with four licenses for Pelco cameras. Third party camera licenses can be purchased separately. The software can be downloaded from the Pelco website, www.pelco.com and is included on a disk in the camera box.

John you don't mention the price of the Axis camera. I looked online and it's over $500. It also looks like the Axis has a double image in several of your pictures. Is that accurate to what you saw live? You may also want to look at these cameras in a WDR scene. I know they aren't marketed for that use but one of our employees did a demo and the IL10 surprised us.The ACTi camera suprised me for a $130 camera. How well do they hold up?

Why did Pelco decide to make these so darn ugly?

To be honest, this is a "budget camera for pelco". What I mean by that is its stripped down of many features of what most budget buyers want.

- Not outdoor rated
- No IR

- Only goes up to 720p

Undisclosed, I actually disagree with your notion that connecting a $200 camera to a $200 VMS channel is pointless. If a $200 camera (this one or otherwise) serves the purpose, why would you get a $400 instead? Best example to me is interior hallways in 24/7 facilities. There are a lot of color-only cameras that are low cost and will work fine in that environment, so why pay more?

Moses, thanks for pointing that out.

Alan, the Axis camera is more expensive, yes. It was included as a sort of baseline of color only performance, so readers had a more familiar reference point for the other cameras in the test. I'll add in a note about the other cameras. Also can you explain what you mean by double image? I'm not seeing it.

Sean, I actually think the aesthetics are better than a cube camera, which is what these are mainly competing against. It is definitely a budget camera. It might not be what you see budget buyers asking for, but it is much lower cost than Pelco's other Sarix cameras. So, it's at least a step into the "value" world for them.

It looks like the IL10 economy box camera has more available video options than their IM10LW10-1 indoor dome that I was experimenting with in my lab last week.

The IM10LW10-1 appears to only have a max frame rate of 12 ips, and has only one resolution option, 1280x720.

Ethan look at the 30Lux picture around the eye chart. There is a halo effect.

I pointed out the Axis price because you listed the Sony as the upper end in this catogory at $300 and you didn't include it in the testing.

As for where this camera fits in the market. It's not likely going in a casino or industrial setting but at half the price of the Axis it would fit well in the same interior locations we sold color only analog cameras for years.

If Pelco develops a NVR appliance to support this class of cameras it would make a nice system for installers still on analog.

Alan, the Axis used in this test was varifocal while the Pelco IL10 is fixed focal. That is a notable difference and one of the drivers in higher price.

We choose that Axis model because we wanted a 'value' line camera but also wanted to match up the FoV width (and with the M114 could do so).

Undisclosed the IM10LW does offer 30 Images at a lower resolution you just have to go to the A/V Streams tab to select a customized resolution and frame rate.

Gotta love that fine print!

The low frame rate for max resolution has been a problem for many of the early Pelco Sarix cameras.

Thanks John

The M1114 comes with a F1.2 or F1.4 lens depending on the varifocal. The ACTi and Pelco appear to have a fixed F2. Ignoring the shutter for a moment, the Axis standard lens would let in twice the light of the other two. I'm not trying to be picky but the ACTi and Pelco seem to be comparable products but the Axis is in a different group connected to the other two only by resolution.

The low end IP market is growing and I appreciate the test. I'm surprised by what the ACTi can do for a $130 pricepoint. I never liked the "pack of cigerettes" form factor but it did a decent job with enough light.

Yep, that Axis model is better in low light but costs more money. We didn't downgrade / judge the Pelco model because of that.

We wanted to have 2 cameras - one less expensive, one more expensive, to give readers a range of comparison.

Moses - Maybe I'm missing something...

I can't select a frame rate setting higher than 12 ips or a resolution other than 720p while in the A/V Streams tab, Video Configuration page regardless of what compression or bit rate settings I use.

I think what you are missing is that you have to lower the resolution to get 30ips. In other words, it's not possible to get 30ips at 720ps but it is at lower resolutions.

John - I'm not able to lower the resolution. The only resolution setting in the dropdown box that isn't grayed out is 1280x720.

Undisclosed you need to clear the secondary stream first and then you can make changes and also add the secondary stream back if you need it after the change.

Moses - That worked, thanks! I can get 30 ips at 640x480 resolution now. I figured there had to be some way of doing it that I was missing.

One minor annoyance I have with the Pelco cameras is that there is no help file built into the camera configuration software like Axis and other manufacturers have. When you click on the "Help" link, it refers you to the main Pelco website and you have to naviagate through the site to find the document you need, which can time consuming if you don't know where to look. The lack of a help file could be a problematic if a technician is troubleshooting or reconfiguring cameras on a closed system without an internet connection and they don't have the CD-ROM or instructions that came in the box (the installers are pretty good at chucking those in the dumpster before they even hang the camera). :)

I still find it strange that the $250 economy box camera can go 30ips/5kbps at 720p resolution, but their $650 dome in the same family is capped at 12ips/3kbps at 720p, albeit is has a few more features. I guess there are always trade-offs. The stream configuration settings in Ethan's video seem cleaner on the $250 IL camera.

Undisclosed you will see some new cameras coming out that should resolve these issues in the near future, thanks for your input.

Gary,

I concur with your thoughts on low light at the high end.

I find it funny that most of my (residential) clients in the high-end bracket will pay top dollar for a system, yet don't seem interested in spending $800 or whatever to install much needed light resulting in a good COLOR picture. No, they rather spend $600 on an Axis T90C!!

I find the Axis P33 and T90C to be a good combo. Wondering if there may be a better option out there.....anyone??

Cheers!

In relation to this camera discussion......I have installed several BRICKCOM

  • WCB-100Ap 1.2MP WiFi cams (PoE available) (~$200) Cigarette box it is, but what a great camera. Excellent picture, Excellent 2 way audio. Has an IR good for a small room (10' X 10') at a push. 2.8mm lens giving a 90FoV and A free 64CH VMS in the box too!!
    • Compact and Streamline Design
    • Built-in PIR Sensor and Illumination LED
    • Built-in MIC and Speaker
    • EasyConfig for Easy Set Up and GUI Integration
    • Built-in Micro SD/ SDHC Memory Card Slot
    • MPEG-4, MJPEG and H.264 Triple Codec Compression
    • 802.11a/b/g/n Wireless Connectivity
    • WPS Supported for Easy Wireless Network Setup

    They also have a 3MP and 5MP cigarette box and of course a host of other cameras that I have not tested just yet!

The low frame rate for max resolution has been a problem for many of the early Pelco Sarix cameras."

Hi John, I don't think there is a "problem" with early Pelco Sarix. They offer 2.1MPx / 30IPS since the first Sarix release. Most models can't go max resolution @ 30IPS, but can make HD @ 12 to 25 IPS.

I mean, it's not a "problem", just were designed that way.

Regarding free Pelco VMS, DS-NVS can be installed in a third party PC and have 4 free licenses for more than 200 specific models (Pelco and third party) as well as ONVIF compatibility.

Also you can manage several PCs from a centralized workstation.

"Low cost" or customer's existing PCs probably can be used as NVRs with Pelco's DS-NVS because will record only 4 cameras. It's not the ideal project, but can be part of a migration schedule for some customers...

Well, it's a problem for anyone who wants the max resolution at high frame rates. Plus, Pelco's competitors had been offering better fps/resolution combos for years.

I see the point, but still is not a problem for me: when my preferred brand doesn't have the specific option needed, I add another brand and model that is compatible or just switch to another "backup" brand.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Dahua 4K IR PTZ Tested on Aug 21, 2017
4K has made its way to IR PTZs. In this report, we examine the Dahua 6AE830VNI, a 4K PTZ with 30x optical zoom, 200m (~650') integrated IR, and...
Sony Next Gen HD Dome Camera Tested (SNC-EM642R) on Aug 18, 2017
Sony has released their latest generation, claiming improved WDR and low light, increased IR range, and more. We tested the SNC-EM642R outdoor IR...
IP Networking Course September 2017 on Aug 17, 2017
This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals plus it includes live training, personal help and...
Cat 5e vs Cat 6 vs Cat 6a Network Cable Usage Statistics on Aug 16, 2017
Cat 5e? Cat 6? Cat 6a? What do integrators use in practice, today? 140+ integrators told IPVM. Here are the results: For those who want to...
Axis Laser Focus PTZ Tested on Aug 14, 2017
Axis has been touting its new Q6155-E laser focus PTZ as 'always in focus' and 'always in color'. Does it really deliver? We bought and tested...
IP Camera Specification / RFP Guide 2017 on Aug 14, 2017
RFPs are hard. Do them 'right' and it takes a lot of knowledge and time. Do them 'wrong' and you can be (a) unwittingly locked into a specific...
ADI 'In The Dark' About Low Light on Aug 07, 2017
ADI's recent post on 'How To See Better In the Dark' makes basic mistakes, promoting outdated technical claims. Missing: Super Low...
Dahua 4K Turret Tested Vs Hikvision (N84BG44 ) on Aug 02, 2017
Dahua has released their latest low cost 4K model, the N84BG44, claiming Smart H.265+ and 50m IR range. We bought and tested this new model against...
Super Low Light Surveillance Guide on Aug 01, 2017
At the beginning of this decade, low light performance of megapixel cameras was generally terrible. This was the era of super slow shutter where...
IR Surveillance Guide on Jul 31, 2017
Infrared (IR) has become an increasing core component to video surveillance systems. In particular, the expansion of integrated IR cameras that...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Dahua 4K IR PTZ Tested on Aug 21, 2017
4K has made its way to IR PTZs. In this report, we examine the Dahua 6AE830VNI, a 4K PTZ with 30x optical zoom, 200m (~650') integrated IR, and...
Top Used License Plate Capture Cameras on Aug 21, 2017
Capturing license plates is a common video surveillance application. But what cameras do integrators mostly commonly used? Special purpose LPC...
VLAN For Video Surveillance Usage Statistics on Aug 21, 2017
VLANs (see our tutorial) are an option for networks using video surveillance, but how often are they actually used? 125+ integrators told us how...
Avigilon CEO Attacks Asian Companies Cyber Insecurity on Aug 18, 2017
Avigilon CEO is taking aim at their Asian competitors. And he is going directly after these company's cyber security issues. In this note, we...
Sony Next Gen HD Dome Camera Tested (SNC-EM642R) on Aug 18, 2017
Sony has released their latest generation, claiming improved WDR and low light, increased IR range, and more. We tested the SNC-EM642R outdoor IR...
IP Networking Course September 2017 on Aug 17, 2017
This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals plus it includes live training, personal help and...
Knightscope Raises $10 Million With $3,320 Average Per Investor on Aug 17, 2017
Congrats to Knightscope. And condolences to their legion of little investors. Knightscope has disclosed they have raised $10+ million from their...
Axis and Arecont Legal Conflict Over Multi-Imager Cameras on Aug 17, 2017
Arecont threatened Axis. Axis has responded by moving to invalidate an Arecont patent. It is an important contest. Multi-imagers are Arecont's...
Directory Of Consumer Security Cameras on Aug 16, 2017
The consumer camera segment continues to grow, with new startups and models from existing players released seemingly every month. In this report we...
Cat 5e vs Cat 6 vs Cat 6a Network Cable Usage Statistics on Aug 16, 2017
Cat 5e? Cat 6? Cat 6a? What do integrators use in practice, today? 140+ integrators told IPVM. Here are the results: For those who want to...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact