Testing Pelco Sarix IL10

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jun 12, 2013

Value / budget cameras are becoming increasingly important for even 'professional' oriented manufacturers and are viewed as a key means to expand IP to the lower end of the market. This spring, Pelco joined this trend with its IL10 series Sarix cameras.

In this report, we share our test results of the IL10 box model, which we matched up against the ACTi D11 and Axis M1114, other 720p budget cameras supporting the same FoV. Here's the cameras side by side:

Here's a preview of the image comparison:

We did a series of comparisons at various light levels and settings to better understand tradeoffs.

***** / ****** ******* *** ******** ************ ********* *** **** 'professional' ******** ************* *** *** ****** ** * *** ***** to ****** ** ** *** ***** *** ** *** ******. This ******, ***** ****** **** ***** **** ******* ****** ***** *******.

** **** ******, ** ***** *** **** ******* ** *** IL10 *** *****, ***** ** ******* ** ******* *** **** *** and **** *****, ***** **** ****** ******* ********** *** **** FoV. ****'* *** ******* **** ** ****:

****'* * ******* ** *** ***** **********:

** *** * ****** ** *********** ** ******* ***** ****** and ******** ** ****** ********** *********.

[***************]

Key ******** 

**** *** *** *** ********:

  • ******* ****** *** **************** ** ***** *** **** ***** **** *******, ******* ******* 1/6.9" ******.
  • *********** ***** ** ******* ** ********** *** *****,~** ***, **** ********* ***** ********* *******.
  • *** ************ ******* **** ******* ** ****, ********* ********* ** * lux, *** **** * ***** ***** ** * *** *** below.
  • **** ******* ******(*/**, ****** ** ** *******) ******* ** ****** ****** ****.
  • *** **** ******** **** ******* ******* *** ****** *************.
  • ******* ********* * **/*, ***** ** *** **** *** **** ************, but **** ***************************. ** ********* ******** **** ** * **/* ** * Mb/s, ********* ** ********* *** ****** ** *** *****.
  • ********** *** *********, ***** *** ** ********** ** ************* *****, but ******* ** **** ******** **********.
  • *****:*** ***** **** ***** ***~$*** ******. *** **** ***** **** ******* **** ****** ** *****, from~$***(******** ******) **~$***+(**** ***-*****), ******* *** **** ** *** ******/**** **** ** **** range.

***************

******** ** ***** *** **** *******, *** **** ******** ****, with ***** *********** ** **** *** ******, *** ******* ** low ***** (**** ****** ** *** *****). *******, ** ** priced $**-*** ***** **** *********************, ********* *** **** *** ** **** **** (~$*** ******). ** *** ***** ****, **** ******* *** **** **** factor *** *** ****** *** **** / ********** ** **** 'mini-box'. *** **** ** ******* ** ******* ***-*****/***** **** ***, *** ******* **** *********.

Physical ********

** **** *****, ** ****** *** ******** ************ ** *** IL10. ***** ****** ********** **** *** *********:

  • ***** *** ********, *** ** *** ****'* **** ***** */*.*" sensor, *** **** ** **** ******* **** **** ******** **** surveillance *******.
  • *** ******'* ** ******* *******, ******* **** *** **** ** a ******** *** ******.
  • ** **** ********** ***** **** ********, **** ** */* ** audio.

Configuration / ****** *** *********

*** *** ********** *********** *** ***** **** *** *********. ***** should **** *** ********* *** ******:

  • ********** *** *********, **** ***** ******* **** ******* ***** *******.
  • */** **** ******* ("*****-***** ******** ** *** *****") ** ******* by *******, ******* *********** ****** ****.
  • *.*** ******** ** *** ****, *** **** *** ***** *** fine ******* ******* ** ***** ********. *******, ***** *** ****** between ********* (**, **, **, ** ** ***) *** ****, medium, *** *** "*******" ***** **** ******* * **/* *** 1 **/* ********. 

Indoor ***********

** * **** *** *****, ******* ***-*** ***, *** **** performs ********** ** *** **** *** ****, ******* *****'* ******* imager. **** *** ************ ** *** **** *****, ***** ******** greater ****** ** *** *******'* ****, *** ******** ****** *********** of *** **** *****, **** ** **** *.

 

*******, ******** *** ***** ***** ** ** ***, ** *** see *** **** ******* ******* ******** ** *** ***** *******, obscuring ******* ** *** ******* *** *****:

 

******** ****** ******* ** * ***, *** **** ** ********** dimmer **** *** ***, ****** **** ******* ************* *** **** level ** ******, ****** *** ********* ****. *** **** ***** still ******** ******* ******* ** *** ******* *** * ****** of ***** ******** ** *** *****, ******* ********** *****.

 

*******, ** * *** *** *****, *** **** ******** *********** no *****, *** **** *** ***. *** ***** ******** ********* at **** *****, *** ****** ******.

Slow ******* ***********

** *******, *** **** ***** *** ******* **** */*** ** 1/5s ** *** *****. ****'** ******* **********, **** ******* ** ******** ******* ******, *** **** ****** of ****** ****.

*** *******, **** ******* ***** *** ** */**, ** ~* lux, *** **** ******** ***** ****** ****** ** *** **** the ***** *** ** */***:

*******, **** **** ** *** ***** ***** * ***, **** using **** *******, *** **** ******** ** *****, ***** *** M1114 ******** *********:

 

*******, ** ** ****** **** ***** **** *******, ****** **** is ******, ********* ****** *** ******* ** *** *******, *** is ******* ******* ** *** *****.

*******, **** ********** ***** *** **** ***** **** */** *** 1/30s ******* ****** *** ********** ******* ***** *** ********:

***** *** ******** ****** ***** ** *** ***** ******* ***/******/********** ***** *** **********.

Bandwidth *** ***********

*** **** **** *** ******** **** *** ****** ***** ** select ******* ******* ** *, *, ** * **/*, **** framerates ** **, **, **, ** **. ******* ** ****, there ** ** *** ** ******** **** ********* ***********, ***** the **** *** **** ******* *** ***. *******, ** ****** each ******* ** * **** ***** ***** * ***** ***** to ****** * **** ****** ** ******, ** ***** ** see *** **** ******* ***********:

** ** ***, ** ***** *** ********* ************************* (** * ***** ** *-**):

  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • **** ***: ~**
  • **** *****: ~**

***** ** ****, ** **** ****** ******, ** ** ***, 1 **/* ** *** ***********, ******** *** **** ***********, ***** 5 **/* ** ********, **** * *********** ***** **** ***** others ******* **** ******* ******** ** *******.

*******, ** ****** *** **** ***** * * **/* ****** at ** *** ** *** **** **** ****** *****, *** quantization ******* ** ~** *******. ********* ************ ******* *** **** ********* ** *****, ***** *** ****** **** ***** **** ******* ** ******* scenes.

Comments (28)

What's the market for these super economical cameras? The are almost getting cheaper than a camera connection license for an upper tier VMS.

I think there's a big market, specifically for people who don't want to pay for an upper tier VMS license ;)

~$200 and less cameras are going to become more common (even Axis has a half dozen in that range now). Plus VMS licensing costs have been going down for a while as well!

There will be still those who value $1000 IP cameras and $300 VMS licenses but those will, statistically be, the elite.

True. I might be a little handicapped as I mainly deal with larger systems. I haven't seen much downward movement in camera connection licensing prices from the bigger VMS players.

What are users typically connecting these types of economical cameras to? NVR's? Alarm Systems? Hosted video? I would assume Axis' low cost cameras are marketed in conjunction with their free Axis Camera Companion software. Milestone has a free VMS download for small camera installations but the features are somewhat limited. Are Pelco or other manufacturers coming out with a similar freebie basic VMS offerings? What low per camera cost VMS'es are good candidates for these type cameras?

It doesn't make sense to connect a $150-200 camera to a VMS platform that costs $150-200 per camera connection license so I wouldn't expect to see many of these cameras connected to the bigger name VMS platforms. Maybe the lower cost cmaeras will drive license prices down.

I'm guessing the goals/markets for these cameras are: Substitute for analog. Smaller systems market. More coverage for the buck. A market response to Ubiquiti and ACTI. I just hope it doesn't become a race to the bottom and further commoditize the IP camera market.

On the enterprise / large system level, the downward movement is typically negotiated (i.e., the MSRP is $250 but we'll give a 55% discount for this 500 camera deal we want, etc.). However, Milestone's new Interconnect offering clearly and structurally reduces price.

As for what to connect a $200 camera to...

As you mentioned, there are free VMS versions offered by the camera manufacturer as well as a number from third parties. Beyond that, there are now a number of ~$50 VMS versions even from bigger manufacturers - Milestone Essential, Exacq Start, etc.

I don't think it will be a race to the bottom. It will simply mean that higher end cameras will need to continue to innovate with advanced features - auto focusing, smart integrated IR, improved WDR, higher resolution, panoramic imaging, multi-imagers, video analytics, etc. However, generic HD cameras are certainly being commoditized.

I think that manufacturers should focus on low light performance at higher MP for the high end and they will be able to keep the high end prices they want. I don't see that being a challenge from the low end market for quite some time.

Pelco does offer a free VMS with four licenses for Pelco cameras. Third party camera licenses can be purchased separately. The software can be downloaded from the Pelco website, www.pelco.com and is included on a disk in the camera box.

John you don't mention the price of the Axis camera. I looked online and it's over $500. It also looks like the Axis has a double image in several of your pictures. Is that accurate to what you saw live? You may also want to look at these cameras in a WDR scene. I know they aren't marketed for that use but one of our employees did a demo and the IL10 surprised us.The ACTi camera suprised me for a $130 camera. How well do they hold up?

Why did Pelco decide to make these so darn ugly?

To be honest, this is a "budget camera for pelco". What I mean by that is its stripped down of many features of what most budget buyers want.

- Not outdoor rated
- No IR

- Only goes up to 720p

Undisclosed, I actually disagree with your notion that connecting a $200 camera to a $200 VMS channel is pointless. If a $200 camera (this one or otherwise) serves the purpose, why would you get a $400 instead? Best example to me is interior hallways in 24/7 facilities. There are a lot of color-only cameras that are low cost and will work fine in that environment, so why pay more?

Moses, thanks for pointing that out.

Alan, the Axis camera is more expensive, yes. It was included as a sort of baseline of color only performance, so readers had a more familiar reference point for the other cameras in the test. I'll add in a note about the other cameras. Also can you explain what you mean by double image? I'm not seeing it.

Sean, I actually think the aesthetics are better than a cube camera, which is what these are mainly competing against. It is definitely a budget camera. It might not be what you see budget buyers asking for, but it is much lower cost than Pelco's other Sarix cameras. So, it's at least a step into the "value" world for them.

It looks like the IL10 economy box camera has more available video options than their IM10LW10-1 indoor dome that I was experimenting with in my lab last week.

The IM10LW10-1 appears to only have a max frame rate of 12 ips, and has only one resolution option, 1280x720.

Ethan look at the 30Lux picture around the eye chart. There is a halo effect.

I pointed out the Axis price because you listed the Sony as the upper end in this catogory at $300 and you didn't include it in the testing.

As for where this camera fits in the market. It's not likely going in a casino or industrial setting but at half the price of the Axis it would fit well in the same interior locations we sold color only analog cameras for years.

If Pelco develops a NVR appliance to support this class of cameras it would make a nice system for installers still on analog.

Alan, the Axis used in this test was varifocal while the Pelco IL10 is fixed focal. That is a notable difference and one of the drivers in higher price.

We choose that Axis model because we wanted a 'value' line camera but also wanted to match up the FoV width (and with the M114 could do so).

Undisclosed the IM10LW does offer 30 Images at a lower resolution you just have to go to the A/V Streams tab to select a customized resolution and frame rate.

Gotta love that fine print!

The low frame rate for max resolution has been a problem for many of the early Pelco Sarix cameras.

Thanks John

The M1114 comes with a F1.2 or F1.4 lens depending on the varifocal. The ACTi and Pelco appear to have a fixed F2. Ignoring the shutter for a moment, the Axis standard lens would let in twice the light of the other two. I'm not trying to be picky but the ACTi and Pelco seem to be comparable products but the Axis is in a different group connected to the other two only by resolution.

The low end IP market is growing and I appreciate the test. I'm surprised by what the ACTi can do for a $130 pricepoint. I never liked the "pack of cigerettes" form factor but it did a decent job with enough light.

Yep, that Axis model is better in low light but costs more money. We didn't downgrade / judge the Pelco model because of that.

We wanted to have 2 cameras - one less expensive, one more expensive, to give readers a range of comparison.

Moses - Maybe I'm missing something...

I can't select a frame rate setting higher than 12 ips or a resolution other than 720p while in the A/V Streams tab, Video Configuration page regardless of what compression or bit rate settings I use.

I think what you are missing is that you have to lower the resolution to get 30ips. In other words, it's not possible to get 30ips at 720ps but it is at lower resolutions.

John - I'm not able to lower the resolution. The only resolution setting in the dropdown box that isn't grayed out is 1280x720.

Undisclosed you need to clear the secondary stream first and then you can make changes and also add the secondary stream back if you need it after the change.

Moses - That worked, thanks! I can get 30 ips at 640x480 resolution now. I figured there had to be some way of doing it that I was missing.

One minor annoyance I have with the Pelco cameras is that there is no help file built into the camera configuration software like Axis and other manufacturers have. When you click on the "Help" link, it refers you to the main Pelco website and you have to naviagate through the site to find the document you need, which can time consuming if you don't know where to look. The lack of a help file could be a problematic if a technician is troubleshooting or reconfiguring cameras on a closed system without an internet connection and they don't have the CD-ROM or instructions that came in the box (the installers are pretty good at chucking those in the dumpster before they even hang the camera). :)

I still find it strange that the $250 economy box camera can go 30ips/5kbps at 720p resolution, but their $650 dome in the same family is capped at 12ips/3kbps at 720p, albeit is has a few more features. I guess there are always trade-offs. The stream configuration settings in Ethan's video seem cleaner on the $250 IL camera.

Undisclosed you will see some new cameras coming out that should resolve these issues in the near future, thanks for your input.

Gary,

I concur with your thoughts on low light at the high end.

I find it funny that most of my (residential) clients in the high-end bracket will pay top dollar for a system, yet don't seem interested in spending $800 or whatever to install much needed light resulting in a good COLOR picture. No, they rather spend $600 on an Axis T90C!!

I find the Axis P33 and T90C to be a good combo. Wondering if there may be a better option out there.....anyone??

Cheers!

In relation to this camera discussion......I have installed several BRICKCOM

  • WCB-100Ap 1.2MP WiFi cams (PoE available) (~$200) Cigarette box it is, but what a great camera. Excellent picture, Excellent 2 way audio. Has an IR good for a small room (10' X 10') at a push. 2.8mm lens giving a 90FoV and A free 64CH VMS in the box too!!
    • Compact and Streamline Design
    • Built-in PIR Sensor and Illumination LED
    • Built-in MIC and Speaker
    • EasyConfig for Easy Set Up and GUI Integration
    • Built-in Micro SD/ SDHC Memory Card Slot
    • MPEG-4, MJPEG and H.264 Triple Codec Compression
    • 802.11a/b/g/n Wireless Connectivity
    • WPS Supported for Easy Wireless Network Setup

    They also have a 3MP and 5MP cigarette box and of course a host of other cameras that I have not tested just yet!

The low frame rate for max resolution has been a problem for many of the early Pelco Sarix cameras."

Hi John, I don't think there is a "problem" with early Pelco Sarix. They offer 2.1MPx / 30IPS since the first Sarix release. Most models can't go max resolution @ 30IPS, but can make HD @ 12 to 25 IPS.

I mean, it's not a "problem", just were designed that way.

Regarding free Pelco VMS, DS-NVS can be installed in a third party PC and have 4 free licenses for more than 200 specific models (Pelco and third party) as well as ONVIF compatibility.

Also you can manage several PCs from a centralized workstation.

"Low cost" or customer's existing PCs probably can be used as NVRs with Pelco's DS-NVS because will record only 4 cameras. It's not the ideal project, but can be part of a migration schedule for some customers...

Well, it's a problem for anyone who wants the max resolution at high frame rates. Plus, Pelco's competitors had been offering better fps/resolution combos for years.

I see the point, but still is not a problem for me: when my preferred brand doesn't have the specific option needed, I add another brand and model that is compatible or just switch to another "backup" brand.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
Bandwidth vs Low Light Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Geovision, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Feb 08, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance, but do all manufacturers' cameras perform the same? Are some more consistent...
Sony Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 06, 2019
Sony Favorability amongst integrators improved moderately compared to their 2017 favorability results, with a modest net positive...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on Jan 28, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
Camera Course Winter 2019 - Last Chance on Jan 24, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the Winter 2019 Camera Course. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth...
Testing Bandwidth vs. Frame Rate on Jan 23, 2019
Selecting frame rate has a major impact on surveillance bandwidth and storage consumption. But with smart codecs now common and cameras more...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Insurance Startup Coalition Profile on Mar 20, 2019
Many industry people believe cybersecurity insurance is not worth it, as the voting and debate in our Cybersecurity Insurance For Security...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Top Metrics For Ensuring Integrator Profitability - Statistics on Mar 20, 2019
How do integrators ensure the profitability of their projects? As part of our profitability study, 100+ integrators answered the following...
Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Hanwha Tax Evasion Probe, Camera Division Implicated on Mar 19, 2019
A Hanwha group subsidiary was raided as part of a tax evasion probe. While a Korean news media report listed the raided entity as 'Hanwha...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact