Testing Pelco Sarix IL10

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jun 12, 2013

Value / budget cameras are becoming increasingly important for even 'professional' oriented manufacturers and are viewed as a key means to expand IP to the lower end of the market. This spring, Pelco joined this trend with its IL10 series Sarix cameras.

In this report, we share our test results of the IL10 box model, which we matched up against the ACTi D11 and Axis M1114, other 720p budget cameras supporting the same FoV. Here's the cameras side by side:

Here's a preview of the image comparison:

We did a series of comparisons at various light levels and settings to better understand tradeoffs.

***** / ****** ******* *** ******** ************ ********* *** **** 'professional' ******** ************* *** *** ****** ** * *** ***** to ****** ** ** *** ***** *** ** *** ******. This ******, ***** ****** **** ***** **** ******* ****** ***** *******.

** **** ******, ** ***** *** **** ******* ** *** IL10 *** *****, ***** ** ******* ** ******* *** **** *** and **** *****, ***** **** ****** ******* ********** *** **** FoV. ****'* *** ******* **** ** ****:

****'* * ******* ** *** ***** **********:

** *** * ****** ** *********** ** ******* ***** ****** and ******** ** ****** ********** *********.

[***************]

Key ******** 

**** *** *** *** ********:

  • ******* ****** *** **************** ** ***** *** **** ***** **** *******, ******* ******* 1/6.9" ******.
  • *********** ***** ** ******* ** ********** *** *****,~** ***, **** ********* ***** ********* *******.
  • *** ************ ******* **** ******* ** ****, ********* ********* ** * lux, *** **** * ***** ***** ** * *** *** below.
  • **** ******* ******(*/**, ****** ** ** *******) ******* ** ****** ****** ****.
  • *** **** ******** **** ******* ******* *** ****** *************.
  • ******* ********* * **/*, ***** ** *** **** *** **** ************, but **** ***************************. ** ********* ******** **** ** * **/* ** * Mb/s, ********* ** ********* *** ****** ** *** *****.
  • ********** *** *********, ***** *** ** ********** ** ************* *****, but ******* ** **** ******** **********.
  • *****:*** ***** **** ***** ***~$*** ******. *** **** ***** **** ******* **** ****** ** *****, from~$***(******** ******) **~$***+(**** ***-*****), ******* *** **** ** *** ******/**** **** ** **** range.

***************

******** ** ***** *** **** *******, *** **** ******** ****, with ***** *********** ** **** *** ******, *** ******* ** low ***** (**** ****** ** *** *****). *******, ** ** priced $**-*** ***** **** *********************, ********* *** **** *** ** **** **** (~$*** ******). ** *** ***** ****, **** ******* *** **** **** factor *** *** ****** *** **** / ********** ** **** 'mini-box'. *** **** ** ******* ** ******* ***-*****/***** **** ***, *** ******* **** *********.

Physical ********

** **** *****, ** ****** *** ******** ************ ** *** IL10. ***** ****** ********** **** *** *********:

  • ***** *** ********, *** ** *** ****'* **** ***** */*.*" sensor, *** **** ** **** ******* **** **** ******** **** surveillance *******.
  • *** ******'* ** ******* *******, ******* **** *** **** ** a ******** *** ******.
  • ** **** ********** ***** **** ********, **** ** */* ** audio.

Configuration / ****** *** *********

*** *** ********** *********** *** ***** **** *** *********. ***** should **** *** ********* *** ******:

  • ********** *** *********, **** ***** ******* **** ******* ***** *******.
  • */** **** ******* ("*****-***** ******** ** *** *****") ** ******* by *******, ******* *********** ****** ****.
  • *.*** ******** ** *** ****, *** **** *** ***** *** fine ******* ******* ** ***** ********. *******, ***** *** ****** between ********* (**, **, **, ** ** ***) *** ****, medium, *** *** "*******" ***** **** ******* * **/* *** 1 **/* ********. 

Indoor ***********

** * **** *** *****, ******* ***-*** ***, *** **** performs ********** ** *** **** *** ****, ******* *****'* ******* imager. **** *** ************ ** *** **** *****, ***** ******** greater ****** ** *** *******'* ****, *** ******** ****** *********** of *** **** *****, **** ** **** *.

 

*******, ******** *** ***** ***** ** ** ***, ** *** see *** **** ******* ******* ******** ** *** ***** *******, obscuring ******* ** *** ******* *** *****:

 

******** ****** ******* ** * ***, *** **** ** ********** dimmer **** *** ***, ****** **** ******* ************* *** **** level ** ******, ****** *** ********* ****. *** **** ***** still ******** ******* ******* ** *** ******* *** * ****** of ***** ******** ** *** *****, ******* ********** *****.

 

*******, ** * *** *** *****, *** **** ******** *********** no *****, *** **** *** ***. *** ***** ******** ********* at **** *****, *** ****** ******.

Slow ******* ***********

** *******, *** **** ***** *** ******* **** */*** ** 1/5s ** *** *****. ****'** ******* **********, **** ******* ** ******** ******* ******, *** **** ****** of ****** ****.

*** *******, **** ******* ***** *** ** */**, ** ~* lux, *** **** ******** ***** ****** ****** ** *** **** the ***** *** ** */***:

*******, **** **** ** *** ***** ***** * ***, **** using **** *******, *** **** ******** ** *****, ***** *** M1114 ******** *********:

 

*******, ** ** ****** **** ***** **** *******, ****** **** is ******, ********* ****** *** ******* ** *** *******, *** is ******* ******* ** *** *****.

*******, **** ********** ***** *** **** ***** **** */** *** 1/30s ******* ****** *** ********** ******* ***** *** ********:

***** *** ******** ****** ***** ** *** ***** ******* ***/******/********** ***** *** **********.

Bandwidth *** ***********

*** **** **** *** ******** **** *** ****** ***** ** select ******* ******* ** *, *, ** * **/*, **** framerates ** **, **, **, ** **. ******* ** ****, there ** ** *** ** ******** **** ********* ***********, ***** the **** *** **** ******* *** ***. *******, ** ****** each ******* ** * **** ***** ***** * ***** ***** to ****** * **** ****** ** ******, ** ***** ** see *** **** ******* ***********:

** ** ***, ** ***** *** ********* ************************* (** * ***** ** *-**):

  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • ***** ****, * **/*: ~**
  • **** ***: ~**
  • **** *****: ~**

***** ** ****, ** **** ****** ******, ** ** ***, 1 **/* ** *** ***********, ******** *** **** ***********, ***** 5 **/* ** ********, **** * *********** ***** **** ***** others ******* **** ******* ******** ** *******.

*******, ** ****** *** **** ***** * * **/* ****** at ** *** ** *** **** **** ****** *****, *** quantization ******* ** ~** *******. ********* ************ ******* *** **** ********* ** *****, ***** *** ****** **** ***** **** ******* ** ******* scenes.

Comments (28)

What's the market for these super economical cameras? The are almost getting cheaper than a camera connection license for an upper tier VMS.

I think there's a big market, specifically for people who don't want to pay for an upper tier VMS license ;)

~$200 and less cameras are going to become more common (even Axis has a half dozen in that range now). Plus VMS licensing costs have been going down for a while as well!

There will be still those who value $1000 IP cameras and $300 VMS licenses but those will, statistically be, the elite.

True. I might be a little handicapped as I mainly deal with larger systems. I haven't seen much downward movement in camera connection licensing prices from the bigger VMS players.

What are users typically connecting these types of economical cameras to? NVR's? Alarm Systems? Hosted video? I would assume Axis' low cost cameras are marketed in conjunction with their free Axis Camera Companion software. Milestone has a free VMS download for small camera installations but the features are somewhat limited. Are Pelco or other manufacturers coming out with a similar freebie basic VMS offerings? What low per camera cost VMS'es are good candidates for these type cameras?

It doesn't make sense to connect a $150-200 camera to a VMS platform that costs $150-200 per camera connection license so I wouldn't expect to see many of these cameras connected to the bigger name VMS platforms. Maybe the lower cost cmaeras will drive license prices down.

I'm guessing the goals/markets for these cameras are: Substitute for analog. Smaller systems market. More coverage for the buck. A market response to Ubiquiti and ACTI. I just hope it doesn't become a race to the bottom and further commoditize the IP camera market.

On the enterprise / large system level, the downward movement is typically negotiated (i.e., the MSRP is $250 but we'll give a 55% discount for this 500 camera deal we want, etc.). However, Milestone's new Interconnect offering clearly and structurally reduces price.

As for what to connect a $200 camera to...

As you mentioned, there are free VMS versions offered by the camera manufacturer as well as a number from third parties. Beyond that, there are now a number of ~$50 VMS versions even from bigger manufacturers - Milestone Essential, Exacq Start, etc.

I don't think it will be a race to the bottom. It will simply mean that higher end cameras will need to continue to innovate with advanced features - auto focusing, smart integrated IR, improved WDR, higher resolution, panoramic imaging, multi-imagers, video analytics, etc. However, generic HD cameras are certainly being commoditized.

I think that manufacturers should focus on low light performance at higher MP for the high end and they will be able to keep the high end prices they want. I don't see that being a challenge from the low end market for quite some time.

Pelco does offer a free VMS with four licenses for Pelco cameras. Third party camera licenses can be purchased separately. The software can be downloaded from the Pelco website, www.pelco.com and is included on a disk in the camera box.

John you don't mention the price of the Axis camera. I looked online and it's over $500. It also looks like the Axis has a double image in several of your pictures. Is that accurate to what you saw live? You may also want to look at these cameras in a WDR scene. I know they aren't marketed for that use but one of our employees did a demo and the IL10 surprised us.The ACTi camera suprised me for a $130 camera. How well do they hold up?

Why did Pelco decide to make these so darn ugly?

To be honest, this is a "budget camera for pelco". What I mean by that is its stripped down of many features of what most budget buyers want.

- Not outdoor rated
- No IR

- Only goes up to 720p

Undisclosed, I actually disagree with your notion that connecting a $200 camera to a $200 VMS channel is pointless. If a $200 camera (this one or otherwise) serves the purpose, why would you get a $400 instead? Best example to me is interior hallways in 24/7 facilities. There are a lot of color-only cameras that are low cost and will work fine in that environment, so why pay more?

Moses, thanks for pointing that out.

Alan, the Axis camera is more expensive, yes. It was included as a sort of baseline of color only performance, so readers had a more familiar reference point for the other cameras in the test. I'll add in a note about the other cameras. Also can you explain what you mean by double image? I'm not seeing it.

Sean, I actually think the aesthetics are better than a cube camera, which is what these are mainly competing against. It is definitely a budget camera. It might not be what you see budget buyers asking for, but it is much lower cost than Pelco's other Sarix cameras. So, it's at least a step into the "value" world for them.

It looks like the IL10 economy box camera has more available video options than their IM10LW10-1 indoor dome that I was experimenting with in my lab last week.

The IM10LW10-1 appears to only have a max frame rate of 12 ips, and has only one resolution option, 1280x720.

Ethan look at the 30Lux picture around the eye chart. There is a halo effect.

I pointed out the Axis price because you listed the Sony as the upper end in this catogory at $300 and you didn't include it in the testing.

As for where this camera fits in the market. It's not likely going in a casino or industrial setting but at half the price of the Axis it would fit well in the same interior locations we sold color only analog cameras for years.

If Pelco develops a NVR appliance to support this class of cameras it would make a nice system for installers still on analog.

Alan, the Axis used in this test was varifocal while the Pelco IL10 is fixed focal. That is a notable difference and one of the drivers in higher price.

We choose that Axis model because we wanted a 'value' line camera but also wanted to match up the FoV width (and with the M114 could do so).

Undisclosed the IM10LW does offer 30 Images at a lower resolution you just have to go to the A/V Streams tab to select a customized resolution and frame rate.

Gotta love that fine print!

The low frame rate for max resolution has been a problem for many of the early Pelco Sarix cameras.

Thanks John

The M1114 comes with a F1.2 or F1.4 lens depending on the varifocal. The ACTi and Pelco appear to have a fixed F2. Ignoring the shutter for a moment, the Axis standard lens would let in twice the light of the other two. I'm not trying to be picky but the ACTi and Pelco seem to be comparable products but the Axis is in a different group connected to the other two only by resolution.

The low end IP market is growing and I appreciate the test. I'm surprised by what the ACTi can do for a $130 pricepoint. I never liked the "pack of cigerettes" form factor but it did a decent job with enough light.

Yep, that Axis model is better in low light but costs more money. We didn't downgrade / judge the Pelco model because of that.

We wanted to have 2 cameras - one less expensive, one more expensive, to give readers a range of comparison.

Moses - Maybe I'm missing something...

I can't select a frame rate setting higher than 12 ips or a resolution other than 720p while in the A/V Streams tab, Video Configuration page regardless of what compression or bit rate settings I use.

I think what you are missing is that you have to lower the resolution to get 30ips. In other words, it's not possible to get 30ips at 720ps but it is at lower resolutions.

John - I'm not able to lower the resolution. The only resolution setting in the dropdown box that isn't grayed out is 1280x720.

Undisclosed you need to clear the secondary stream first and then you can make changes and also add the secondary stream back if you need it after the change.

Moses - That worked, thanks! I can get 30 ips at 640x480 resolution now. I figured there had to be some way of doing it that I was missing.

One minor annoyance I have with the Pelco cameras is that there is no help file built into the camera configuration software like Axis and other manufacturers have. When you click on the "Help" link, it refers you to the main Pelco website and you have to naviagate through the site to find the document you need, which can time consuming if you don't know where to look. The lack of a help file could be a problematic if a technician is troubleshooting or reconfiguring cameras on a closed system without an internet connection and they don't have the CD-ROM or instructions that came in the box (the installers are pretty good at chucking those in the dumpster before they even hang the camera). :)

I still find it strange that the $250 economy box camera can go 30ips/5kbps at 720p resolution, but their $650 dome in the same family is capped at 12ips/3kbps at 720p, albeit is has a few more features. I guess there are always trade-offs. The stream configuration settings in Ethan's video seem cleaner on the $250 IL camera.

Undisclosed you will see some new cameras coming out that should resolve these issues in the near future, thanks for your input.

Gary,

I concur with your thoughts on low light at the high end.

I find it funny that most of my (residential) clients in the high-end bracket will pay top dollar for a system, yet don't seem interested in spending $800 or whatever to install much needed light resulting in a good COLOR picture. No, they rather spend $600 on an Axis T90C!!

I find the Axis P33 and T90C to be a good combo. Wondering if there may be a better option out there.....anyone??

Cheers!

In relation to this camera discussion......I have installed several BRICKCOM

  • WCB-100Ap 1.2MP WiFi cams (PoE available) (~$200) Cigarette box it is, but what a great camera. Excellent picture, Excellent 2 way audio. Has an IR good for a small room (10' X 10') at a push. 2.8mm lens giving a 90FoV and A free 64CH VMS in the box too!!
    • Compact and Streamline Design
    • Built-in PIR Sensor and Illumination LED
    • Built-in MIC and Speaker
    • EasyConfig for Easy Set Up and GUI Integration
    • Built-in Micro SD/ SDHC Memory Card Slot
    • MPEG-4, MJPEG and H.264 Triple Codec Compression
    • 802.11a/b/g/n Wireless Connectivity
    • WPS Supported for Easy Wireless Network Setup

    They also have a 3MP and 5MP cigarette box and of course a host of other cameras that I have not tested just yet!

The low frame rate for max resolution has been a problem for many of the early Pelco Sarix cameras."

Hi John, I don't think there is a "problem" with early Pelco Sarix. They offer 2.1MPx / 30IPS since the first Sarix release. Most models can't go max resolution @ 30IPS, but can make HD @ 12 to 25 IPS.

I mean, it's not a "problem", just were designed that way.

Regarding free Pelco VMS, DS-NVS can be installed in a third party PC and have 4 free licenses for more than 200 specific models (Pelco and third party) as well as ONVIF compatibility.

Also you can manage several PCs from a centralized workstation.

"Low cost" or customer's existing PCs probably can be used as NVRs with Pelco's DS-NVS because will record only 4 cameras. It's not the ideal project, but can be part of a migration schedule for some customers...

Well, it's a problem for anyone who wants the max resolution at high frame rates. Plus, Pelco's competitors had been offering better fps/resolution combos for years.

I see the point, but still is not a problem for me: when my preferred brand doesn't have the specific option needed, I add another brand and model that is compatible or just switch to another "backup" brand.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camera Course Summer 2017 on May 25, 2017
Learn video surveillance and get certified. IPVM provides live online classes, recorded videos, personal help, cutting edge education and...
48MP 180 Camera (Digital Watchdog) Test on May 10, 2017
Camera resolution continues to advance, with Digital Watchdog offering the MegaPIX PANO 48MP 180° camera, the highest resolution mainstream camera...
Hanwha 9MP Fisheye Camera Tested (PNF-9010R) on May 09, 2017
12MP sensor fisheye panoramic cameras are becoming increasingly common. We have tested Hikvision's DS-2CD63C2F as well as Panasonic's SFV481 4K...
Last Day - IP Networking Course May 2017 on Apr 26, 2017
Today is the last day to register for the May IP Networking Course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
Axis Lowest Cost Outdoor IR Camera M2025-LE Tested on Apr 24, 2017
Axis has lagged offering low cost IR cameras while their Asian competitors have made IR standard even in their most entry level cameras. Recently,...
Ring Floodlight Cam Tested on Apr 20, 2017
Ring has released their latest entry, the Floodlight Cam, calling it the "Evolution of Outdoor Security", touting motion activated floodlights,...
Hanwha Lowest Cost WiseNet X Camera (XND-6010) Tested on Apr 13, 2017
IPVM bought and tested the lowest-cost WiseNet X model, the indoor 2MP fixed focal XND-6010 dome, continuing our testing of Hanwha's new WiseNet X...
Pelco Surevision 3 Tested on Apr 12, 2017
Pelco has released generation 3 of its Surevision cameras, claiming improved performance in both super low light and WDR performance. We bought...
Hanwha Wisenet X Tested on Mar 27, 2017
Hanwha has released their latest generation, the Wisenet X series, powered by their new Wisenet 5 processor. This new series claims improvements...
SimpliSafe Camera Tested on Mar 07, 2017
SimpliSafe is one of the most controversial companies in the industry, as they have become the symbol of the DIY threat to traditional alarm...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Anti-Hack Access Card Shields Tested on May 26, 2017
Keeping your access control card information secure is becoming a big priority, especially since cheaper copiers can hack details easily. Multiple...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial 2017 on May 25, 2017
Since 2013, video surveillance professionals have talked about the potential for H.265. Now, in 2017, H.265 is starting to gain mainstream...
Camera Course Summer 2017 on May 25, 2017
Learn video surveillance and get certified. IPVM provides live online classes, recorded videos, personal help, cutting edge education and...
Most Respected Manufacturer Competitors on May 25, 2017
Manufacturers told IPVM what competitor they most respected. In terms of total revenue, Hikvision, Dahua and Axis are certainly tops but would...
CyPhy 'Unlimited' Flight Time Security Drone Examined on May 25, 2017
Drones face several issues as commercial security platforms - legal restrictions (e.g., in the US, the FAA), costs, and limited flight durations...
Milestone Entry Level Mobile Password Vulnerability Disclosed on May 24, 2017
While many manufacturers have only addressed cybersecurity vulnerabilities after public disclosures were made (or threatened), Milestone has...
How Integrators Use IPVM on May 24, 2017
150 integrators explained how they use IPVM and how it helps them stay informed and improve their business.  The 4 main uses integrators cited for...
Alarm Supervision Guide on May 24, 2017
Burglar alarms can constantly monitor the health of attached circuits, sensors, and devices to ensure that they remain operational. This is known...
Arlo Go Cellular Cloud Camera Tested on May 23, 2017
Totally wireless surveillance cameras are growing but almost all typically depend on a hub and local Internet access. However, many outdoor...
Avigilon New COO James Henderson Profile on May 23, 2017
It has been nearly 2 years since the infamous Bryan Schmode 'resigned' as Avigilon COO. Now, Avigilon once again has a COO, promoting James...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact