Testing Arecont Vision's AV3105 H.264 Camera

By: John Honovich, Published on Jul 07, 2009

Arecont Vision's H.264 megapixel product line has drawn an immense amount of interest. At the beginning of 2008, Arecont was the first surveillance company to announce H.264 multi-megapixel and is currently the only manufacturer offering H.264 megapixel up to 5MP.

At the same time, a lot of questions have been raised about image quality, CPU utilization and actual bandwidth savings.

In this test of the AV3105DN with the MPL4-10 lens, we explore the performance and benefits of Arecont's H.264 offering.

Key findings include:

  • Image quality was sharp with basic manual focusing of the lens
  • Compared to MJPEG, H.264 CPU usage was consistently lower
  • Bandwidth utilization for H.264 streams was up to 90% lower than MJPEG
  • High motion or low lux levels caused H.264 bandwidth utilization to rise significantly, reducing efficiency gains
  • Numerous problems existed using the Arecont Vision VMS software though 3rd party VMS software worked well

Product Overview / Key Findings

ArecontVision's 3105 is a 3MP MJPEG/H.264 camera rated for up to 15 fps. The MSRP of the AV3105DN is $1,190 USD. The MSRP of the MPL4-10 lens, sold separately, is $150 USD. On-line prices are likely to be about 30% less than MSRP. While Arecont Vision's cameras are supported widely (over 40 total VMS vendors), according to their recently released NVR support matrix [link no longer available] about half of their partners currently support the H.264 streams.

Test setup: The camera tested was using S/W version 64829 which is the most to up date version at the time of the test. The camera was tested on a Dell Studio laptop with Intel Core 2 Duo 2.00 GHz with 4.0 GB of RAM running Windows Vista Home Premium. The computer was restarted prior to each test and a wired connection was used to a TrendNet 10/100 Mb/s switch.

Image Quality: View the sample test videos to judge for yourself. Image detail was good displaying details of the indoor test area used. In some conditions, colors did not look true to life and this varied by light levels, etc.

Frame Rates: Frame rates were measured using the built-in display of the AV100 software (Cntrl-S to display) While the camera is rated at 15 fps, sometimes the frame rate was significantly lower. H.264 streams generally close to 15fps. However, MJPEG streams were often significantly lower (closer to 6fps).

CPU Utilization: Using the Windows Task Manager CPU monitor on multiple PCs and with the web client, AV's software and ExacqVision, the CPU utilization for H.264 was almost always lower (often significantly) than the MJPEG stream. Since this is a hotly debated item and since our test was not very sophisticated, we would limit the strength of our claim here. However, we have not seen why for multi-megabit video, MJPEG would be less CPU intensive than H.264.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Bandwidth Utilization: [Note: screencast later demonstrates these findings] 3MP H.264 bandwidth utilization was as low as 1Mb/s for well lit (200lux+) areas with minimal to no motion. By contrast, such scenes required about 12Mb/s for MJPEG streams capturing equivalent views. When motion increased (such as the intersection of a road), H.265 bandwidth utilization increased to 5 Mb/s to 10 Mb/s (MJPEG increased slightly to about 15 Mb/s). Additionally, when lux levels dropped, 3MP H.264 streams increased to 10Mb/s even for scenes with no motion (contrast to about 12 Mb/s for equivalent MJPEG streams). 

Bandwidth Utilization / Video Demonstration

Bandwidth/storage utilization is a key element in H.264's value proposition. In the screencast below, we demonstrate how bandwidth utilization varied significantly depending on motion and light levels.

The sample of the traffic intersection with swaying trees and cars is used as an example of high motion. By contrast, the indoor test is an example of low motion and more common in traditional indoor security uses. It is important to identify which scenario is most similar to an intended deployment to project the potential bandwidth impacts.

Physical/Mechanical Overview

The following video demonstrates the camera physically overviewing its size and physical features provided.

Setup and Configuration

The following screencast explains how to configure the camera. Most of the setup is common to all IP cameras.

We had challenges using the AV NVR software. The biggest problem was issues with installing and using it with firewalls. We tried it on 3 PCs. It worked fine on 1 PC where we shut off our firewall. We had to uninstall it on another PC because it created problems with the stability of our system. On our 3rd system, it forced our PC to continuously reboot. I do not know how common such issues are with others use but this is the first time I have such significant issues in VMS software during my recent test of 10 different applications. By contrast, use with the Exacq software worked fine with no problems.

Also, if you need to do a firmware upgrade, no connection to the camera can be running (web interface, VMS, etc.). Otherwise, the upgrade will time out. When all connections are disconnected, the firmware upgrade took 25 minutes.  Arecont reports that this upgrade was an especially large and out of the ordinary size.

Competitive Comparison and Recommendations

There are a few main dimensions specifiers usually consider when comparing megapixel cameras. Here are a few and where I believe the AV3105 stands:

  • Frame Rate: While the frame rate is rated at 15fps, if you really need 10 or more, you should carefully test that this camera can deliver. Sometimes it did for our tests, other times it did not. Most applications do not need more than 10 fps (especially for multi-megapixel) but if this is a requirement be careful.
  • CPU Utilization: It does not seem CPU utilization is any more of an issue than it would be using an MJPEG camera.
  • Bandwidth/Storage Savings: This is the big 'theoretical' driver of using H.264. While in some scenarios, the savings were 90%, in others they were only 10%. It definitely depends on the environment and lighting conditions being used (more motion, less light, less bandwidth savings). You should be careful in determining how much savings your conditions produced. While they could be very high, it may turn out to be not much at all.
  • Bells and Whistles: If you need them (analog or HDMI out, SD card, etc., zoom lens), the AV3105 is not a good choice. It simply does not have them. Compare to Axis Q1755.
  • Price: Arecont's product pricing is generally lower than their direct competitors such as Axis, IQinVision, often by a few hundred dollars. The AV3105 street price is approximately $900 USD (with lens). An Axis 223M, a 2MP camera is about $150-$250 USD more.
  • Image Quality: This is an important factor, one that requires very carefully controlled comparative testing. As I have not done this, I cannot offer recommendations.

8 reports cite this report:

The Truth About IR Lighting and Bandwidth on Aug 13, 2011
One of the industry's top growing myths is that IR illumination massively reduces storage and bandwidth costs. No one has done more to perpetuate...
Examining IR Illuminator Bandwidth Savings and Raytec's Test Results on Oct 09, 2010
In the past few years IR illuminator vendors have made strong marketing claims about dramatic bandwidth savings achieved by using IR (80-95% [link...
Megapixel Camera Comparison 2010 on Feb 22, 2010
Megapixel cameras are clearly 'hot' - the fastest growing segment in the industry for multiple years now. Which should you use? What makes one...
Testing Pelco's Sarix Megapixel Cameras (IXE20DN) on Dec 05, 2009
While Pelco is a leader in analog surveillance cameras, they are not even in the top 10 for 2008 global network camera sales. Pelco aims to rectify...
Testing Sanyo's HD Surveillance Camera (VCC-HD4000) on Dec 01, 2009
Sanyo is making an aggressive push into the IP video surveillance market introducing a broad line of HD cameras [link no longer available] in 2009....
Testing Basler's Megapixel Cameras (BIP-1300/1600) on Nov 29, 2009
Basler is a recent entrant into the IP video surveillance megapixel market. Leveraging its extensive expertise in machine vision [link no longer...
IP Camera 2009 Mid Year Review on Jul 26, 2009
Megapixel was the most dominant trend in IP cameras over the first half of 2009. So dominant was megapixel, that not only did most manufacturers...
Top 5 IP Camera Problems: 2009 on Jul 12, 2009
In the last year, IP cameras have made great strides and while there are still important barriers that constrain broader use, problems are...
Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Phone Camera Calculator Released on Mar 10, 2020
IPVM has released the first-ever Phone Calculator, video surveillance design software that you can use on your phone, without installing an...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Glossary / Acronyms for Video Surveillance on Feb 10, 2020
This directory provides definitions and explanations for over 70 common video surveillance industry terms, including links to related IPVM...
Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Wyze Raises $10 Million And Seeks Services Expansion on May 27, 2020
Wyze has raised $10 million, the company's first disclosed raise since the $20 million announced at the beginning of 2019. Inside this note,...
Startup Videoloft Presents Cloud Storage on May 27, 2020
Videoloft presented offsite cloud storage at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from Videoloft including IPVM...
Directory of 250+ Fever Camera News Reports Globally on May 27, 2020
This global directory tracks 250+ articles about thermal cameras used to detect fevers in response to the coronavirus pandemic. Articles are...
Integrators Rising Against Coronavirus on May 27, 2020
IPVM integrator statistics make it clear - Coronavirus's impact on business is lessening and many are anticipating even better news in weeks...
Netposa Stock Surges 46% After US Human Rights Abuse Sanctions on May 27, 2020
Last Friday, the US government announced it would sanction PRC video management provider NetPosa for being "complicit in human rights violations...
LILIN Presents NDAA-Compliant P2 Cameras on May 26, 2020
Merit LILIN presented its NDAA-compliant P2 camera series at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
ZKTeco Body Temperature and Mask Detection Reader Tested on May 26, 2020
While dedicated fever cameras emerged first, now tablet/kiosk fever detectors are ramping up. China's ZKTeco has been aggressively promoting such...
IDIS Presents 12MP IR Panoramic Fisheye on May 26, 2020
IDIS presented its 12MP IR panoramic fisheye camera at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video from...
FDA Defines Correct Operation of "Fever Cameras" on May 26, 2020
The US FDA has now defined the correct operation of "Thermal Imaging Systems", colloquially known as "fever cameras". Many in video...
OnSSI Founders Return, Start Corsight on May 25, 2020
The OnSSI founders are back, less than 2 years after selling OnSSI to Qognify, they have returned to Corsight, a spin-out of an Israeli AI...