Anti-Terrorism Video Surveillance Bad at Fighting Crime

By Ethan Ace, Published on May 16, 2016

So much of city video surveillance has been deployed and funded with the intention of stopping, or at least mitigating, terrorist attacks.

But these systems are often bad at fighting crime, completely removed from the most troubled areas of the city they serve.

In this note, we take a look at these issues and potential recommendations to solve them.

Anti-Terrorism ******* *** ***********

** *** **** ******, much ** *** ******* for **** ************ ******* has **** ** *** form ** ****-********* ******. For *******, **** *** Department ** ******** ******** or **** *** ******* dollar ******** ********** ***** ******* ended ** ****. ***** ****** ***** ** partially ****** (*** ******** to ****) **** **** surveillance *******, ********* *** York *** *******, ** well ** ******* ******.

*********, ***** ****** **** meant ** ******* ********* targets ** * ********* attack, ***** ********* **** into ***** **********: 

  • ***** **********: ***** ********* ****** **** as ********, ******, ********** halls, *** **** ***** school *********** ***** ****** events **** ****
  • *******:**** ******* *** ********* schools, ** **** ** higher *********
  • ******** **************:***** ********, ********** ********** facilities, *******, ***.

** *** *******, * DHS ****** ***** **** with * ****** *****, water ********* *****, *******, and ******** *********** ********** may ******* ******* ** install ******* ** *** above *****, *********** **** in *****:

Different ***** *** ******** *****

*******, ***** ********* ***** do *** ***** *** locations ** ******* ***** rates, *** *** ** effectively ******* *** ***** police ***** ********** ** forensic *************. ****** *** be **** ** **** video ** ******** ****** to ** **** * crime *****, ********* ** where thoroughfares *** *******, *** this ** *** **********.

*******,******* **** ******* **** ******* *** ******** or ****** ***** ** troubled *****, ***** ***** installed ** *** ***** areas **** ******* ******* and *** ** **** likely ** ***** ******* concerns ** *********.

*** *******, ****** *** above ***** *** ********** the ****** ***** **** highest ***** ***** (** red), ** *** **** the none ** *** ********* highlights ** ********* ********* targets *** **** (****** several ******) ** *** highest ***** *****, **** violent *** ********:

***************

***** *** *** ********* solutions ** ***** ***********:

*** *******

**** *** **** ** the ****** ******* ** place, **** ** *******, storage, **** ********, ****** machines, ***., *** **** may ****** *** ******* to *** ********* ***** on ***** ***** ***** and ***** *****. ** some ***** **** *** be *** **** ******, as **** ****** *** require *** ****** ******* to ****** ** ***** locations.

**** ** *** **** expensive ******, ** *** cameras, ********, ******** ******, and ***** ********* ** required ** **** *** site **. *********** ******** gear **** ********* *******. Additionally, ***** **** ********* calculate *** ****** ** added ******* ** ******** servers, *******, *** ******** links, ** **** *** quickly ******** *** ** these, ****** ***** ** reducing ********* ****.

******** ******** *******

*************, ***** *** ** able ** **** ******** cameras ** *** *********. However, ***** *** ******* caveats:

  • ******** *******:**** **** **** ******* over ** ***** ***, if *** ******** ******* are ***** ** *****, they *** ****** ***, in **** ***** ****** with ** *******, *** easily ************ ** *****, lower **** ******. **** in ***** ***** ******* have ****** *** **** replaced, *** ***** ** the *** ** **** is ****** ****** *** replacements' ***********.
  • **** *** *** *** location:********* *** ****** ** a **** *** *** the *** ********. *** example, **** ********* *** be ****** ****** ** multiple ***** ******* ******* of *** **** ***** were ****** ** ***** systems. ** * ******** may **** ********** *** light ******, ****** ** integrated ** *** * better ***.
  • ******** *********:***** **** ** ******* to ******* ******** ******* in *** *** *********, as ******** ****** (***** 2.4 *** ** *.* GHZ) *** *** **** as **** ** ****** frequency ** ****** ********** models, ********** ** *********** areas ***** ********** ******** is ******.

** ***** ******** *** met, ********** ******* ** likely * ***** **** option ******** ** ****** new **** ** *** system. **** ****** ***** are ******** (************ *****, design, *******, ***.) ******* the ***, *** ********* costs *** ******* ** eliminated.

Funding ********

*** *** ***** ** ***** camera ******** ************* ** that ******* *** ****** much **** ****** **** the **** *** ***** compared ** *** ***/**** 2000s **** ************ ****. Cities *** *********** **** maintaining ******* ** **** than ***** ********* ***** may *** ** ****** in *** ** *** events, **** ****** ******** or ******** *** ********** cameras ** ****** ******** equipment ** **** ****** locations.

******* *** *** ******* is ********* *** ****** from *** ** ********** of *******, ****** ** reduced ****** ******** ** the ******** ******. ***** grants *** ***** ****** ********* ******** ******** ******** (COPS)********* ***** ******* ********** Grants (***), ****** ***** ******* may ** *********.

*******, ** *** *********** with ************** *** *********** serving ****, ******* ** more ****** ** **** from *** *******:

  1. ***** ******* *******, **** as ***** ** ****** grants/budgets. *** ************ ** these ******** ****** ****** from ***** ** ***** or **** ****** ** county.
  2. ******/******* ************, ** ***** community **********, **********, ** residents ********** ******* ** have ******* *********. ***** partnerships **** **** ** increase ********* ***-** *** reduce ********** ** *** public ************ ******, ** residents **** **** ********.

Comments (5)

Avatar

Kevin Nadai

05/16/16 06:38pm

This article conflates terrorism and crime, which are two different things with differing targets. While nearly all terrorism is criminal, not all crime is terrorism.

There are many definitions of terrorism. However, one common aspect of most definitions is that terrorism has a political purpose. Common crime does not. Toward this end, terrorists usually choose high visibility targets such as those outlined in this article:

  • Event Facilities: Large gathering spaces such as stadiums, arenas, convention halls, and even large school auditoriums where public events were held
  • Schools: Both primary and secondary schools, as well as higher education
  • Critical Infrastructure: Water supplies, electrical generation facilities, bridges, etc.

Besides rarely having a political purpose, common crime generally tries to be less readily apparent: poorly lit areas, at night, with few witnesses present.

So that cameras funded by DHS for antiterrorism are not placed in high crime areas makes perfect sense.

Disclaimer: This is my personal opinion and not necessarily that of my employer.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Kevin Nadai | 05/17/16 01:15pm

So that cameras funded by DHS for antiterrorism are not placed in high crime areas makes perfect sense.

Sure, we agree that DHS, by design, does not place cameras in high crime areas. The point is that terrorism has proven to be much less of a threat than garden variety crime and that those DHS funded cameras do not help as much as cameras designed and deployed for 'regular' crime.

Undisclosed #1

IPVMU Certified | In reply to John Honovich | 05/17/16 02:17pm

Yes, but can they simply be relocated from their originally intended aims (anti-terrorism) without violating the grant from which they were funded and continue to be funded, even if the new locations are deemed a better service to the public?

Undisclosed Manufacturer #2

In reply to John Honovich | 05/17/16 03:42pm

I agree with you that terrorism is not an existential threat.

Whatever existential threat terrorism wields, it is only acting as a catalyst. Just as your body can overreact to a honeybee sting, killing itself in the process (anaphylaxis), terrorism's most tangible damage is that which its target inflicts upon itself in response.

The New York Times estimates the actual cost of the September 11 terror attacks at $55 Billion. Since then, the United States has spent $3.3 Trillion in response, sixty times as much. The political and psychological effect of terrorism is to magnify the threat much like an immune response gone haywire.

The point of the article is that cameras placed for antiterrorism are not in high crime areas. I was attempting to explain why this is by design and not by mistake.

Disclaimer: This is my personal opinion and not necessarily that of my employer.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #2 | 05/17/16 05:01pm

I was attempting to explain why this is by design and not by mistake.

Again, we understand that this was by design. The point is, as you acknowledge in your response above, it has turned out to be a mistake in the greater scheme of things.

In other words, some things can be 'by design' and still turn out to be a mistake that would benefit from change. This is not meant politically, but as a observation on how cameras are used by cities.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,594 reports, 889 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

CDW Sells School District 36 Low-Res, No Blackbody Hikvision Fever Cameras With Federal Funds on Oct 01, 2020
Mega IT distributor CDW sold low-resolution Hikvision fever cameras with no...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020,...
The Future of H.266 For Video Surveillance Examined on Aug 17, 2020
First H.264, now H.265, is H.266 next? H.266 was recently announced amid...
Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now,...
Dedicated Vs Converged IP Video Networks Statistics 2020 on Sep 10, 2020
Running one's video system on a converged network with other devices can save...
Video Surveillance History on May 06, 2020
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going...
Axis Compares Fever Camera Sellers to 9/11 on Sep 18, 2020
Axis Communications, the West's largest surveillance camera manufacturer, has...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
Monitoring Alarm Systems From Home - Innovation or Danger? on Oct 13, 2020
Remote monitoring by alarm companies since COVID-19 is bringing cost savings...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Hikvision Temperature Screening Tested on May 20, 2020
Hikvision has ramped up the promotion of its 'temperature screening' system,...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
Uniview H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 08, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision, helped by fever camera sales, are recovering from...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Avigilon Social Distancing Analytics Tested on Aug 26, 2020
Avigilon released its social distancing analytics in response to the...

Recent Reports

VICE Investigates Verkada's Harassing "RawVerkadawgz" on Oct 26, 2020
This month, IPVM investigated Verkada's sexism, discrimination, and cultural...
Six Flags' FDA Violating Outdoor Dahua Fever Cameras on Oct 26, 2020
As Six Flags scrambled to reopen parks amid plummeting revenues caused by the...
ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...
Nokia Fever Screening Claims To "Advance Fight Against COVID-19" on Oct 22, 2020
First IBM, then briefly Clorox, and now Nokia becomes the latest Fortune 500...
Deceptive Meridian Temperature Tablets Endanger Public Safety on Oct 21, 2020
IPVM's testing of and investigation into Meridian Kiosk's temperature...
Honeywell 30 Series and Vivotek NVRs Tested on Oct 21, 2020
The NDAA ban has driven many users to look for low-cost NVRs not made by...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
Dahua Revenue Grows But Profits Down, Cause Unclear on Oct 20, 2020
While Dahua's overall revenue was up more than 12% in Q3 2020, a significant...
Illegal Hikvision Fever Screening Touted In Australia, Government Investigating, Temperature References Deleted on Oct 20, 2020
The Australian government told IPVM that they are investigating a Hikvision...
Panasonic Presents i-PRO Cameras and Video Analytics on Oct 19, 2020
Panasonic i-PRO presented its X-Series cameras and AI video analytics at the...