Anti-Terrorism Video Surveillance Bad at Fighting Crime

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on May 16, 2016

So much of city video surveillance has been deployed and funded with the intention of stopping, or at least mitigating, terrorist attacks.

But these systems are often bad at fighting crime, completely removed from the most troubled areas of the city they serve.

In this note, we take a look at these issues and potential recommendations to solve them.

** **** ** **** ***** ************ *** **** ******** *** funded **** *** ********* ** ********, ** ** ***** **********, terrorist *******.

*** ***** ******* *** ***** *** ** ******** *****, ********** removed **** *** **** ******** ***** ** *** **** **** serve.

** **** ****, ** **** * **** ** ***** ****** and ********* *************** ** ***** ****.

[***************]

Anti-Terrorism ******* *** ***********

** *** **** ******, **** ** *** ******* *** **** surveillance ******* *** **** ** *** **** ** ****-********* ******. For *******, **** *** ********** ** ******** ******** ** **** the ******* ****** ******** ********** ***** ******* ***** ** ****. ***** ****** ***** ** ********* ****** (*** ******** ** fund) **** **** ************ *******, ********* *** **** *** *******, as **** ** ******* ******.

*********, ***** ****** **** ***** ** ******* ********* ******* ** a ********* ******, ***** ********* **** **** ***** **********:

  • ***** **********:***** ********* ****** **** ** ********, ******, ********** *****, *** even ***** ****** *********** ***** ****** ****** **** ****
  • *******:**** ******* *** ********* *******, ** **** ** ****** *********
  • ******** **************:***** ********, ********** ********** **********, *******, ***.

** *** *******, * *** ****** ***** **** **** * sports *****, ***** ********* *****, *******, *** ******** *********** ********** may ******* ******* ** ******* ******* ** *** ***** *****, highlighted **** ** *****:

Different ***** *** ******** *****

*******, ***** ********* ***** ** *** ***** *** ********* ** highest ***** *****, *** *** ** *********** ******* *** ***** police ***** ********** ** ******** *************. ****** *** ** **** to **** ***** ** ******** ****** ** ** **** * crime *****, ********* ** ***** ************* *** *******, *** **** is *** **********.

*******,******* **** *********** ******* *** ******** ** ****** ***** ** ******** *****, while ***** ********* ** *** ***** ***** **** ******* ******* and *** ** **** ****** ** ***** ******* ******** ** residents.

*** *******, ****** *** ***** ***** *** ********** *** ****** areas **** ******* ***** ***** (** ***), ** *** **** the **** ** *** ********* ********** ** ********* ********* ******* are **** (****** ******* ******) ** *** ******* ***** *****, both ******* *** ********:

***************

***** *** *** ********* ********* ** ***** ***********:

*** *******

**** *** **** ** *** ****** ******* ** *****, **** as *******, *******, **** ********, ****** ********, ***., *** **** may ****** *** ******* ** *** ********* ***** ** ***** crime ***** *** ***** *****. ** **** ***** **** *** be *** **** ******, ** **** ****** *** ******* *** funded ******* ** ****** ** ***** *********.

**** ** *** **** ********* ******, ** *** *******, ********, wireless ******, *** ***** ********* ** ******** ** **** *** site **. *********** ******** **** **** ********* *******. ************, ***** must ********* ********* *** ****** ** ***** ******* ** ******** servers, *******, *** ******** *****, ** **** *** ******* ******** any ** *****, ****** ***** ** ******** ********* ****.

******** ******** *******

*************, ***** *** ** **** ** **** ******** ******* ** new *********. *******, ***** *** ******* *******:

  • ******** *******:**** **** **** ******* **** ** ***** ***, ** *** original ******* *** ***** ** *****, **** *** ****** ***, in **** ***** ****** **** ** *******, *** ****** ************ by *****, ***** **** ******. **** ** ***** ***** ******* have ****** *** **** ********, *** ***** ** *** *** in **** ** ****** ****** *** ************' ***********.
  • **** *** *** *** ********:********* *** ****** ** * **** *** *** *** *** location. *** *******, **** ********* *** ** ****** ****** ** multiple ***** ******* ******* ** *** **** ***** **** ****** in ***** *******. ** * ******** *** **** ********** *** light ******, ****** ** ********** ** *** * ****** ***.
  • ******** *********:***** **** ** ******* ** ******* ******** ******* ** *** new *********, ** ******** ****** (***** *.* *** ** *.* GHZ) *** *** **** ** **** ** ****** ********* ** higher ********** ******, ********** ** *********** ***** ***** ********** ******** is ******.

** ***** ******** *** ***, ********** ******* ** ****** * lower **** ****** ******** ** ****** *** **** ** *** system. **** ****** ***** *** ******** (************ *****, ******, *******, etc.) ******* *** ***, *** ********* ***** *** ******* ** eliminated.

Funding ********

*** *** ***** ** ***** ****** ******** ************* ** **** funding *** ****** **** **** ****** **** *** **** *** years ******** ** *** ***/**** ***** **** ************ ****. ****** are *********** **** *********** ******* ** **** **** ***** ********* which *** *** ** ****** ** *** ** *** ******, with ****** ******** ** ******** *** ********** ******* ** ****** existing ********* ** **** ****** *********.

******* *** *** ******* ** ********* *** ****** **** *** US ********** ** *******, ****** ** ******* ****** ******** ** the ******** ******. ***** ****** *** ***** *************** ******** ******** ******** (****)********* ***** ******* ********** ****** (***), ****** ***** ******* *** ** *********.

*******, ** *** *********** **** ************** *** *********** ******* ****, funding ** **** ****** ** **** **** *** *******:

  1. ***** ******* *******, **** ** ***** ** ****** ******/*******. *** availability ** ***** ******** ****** ****** **** ***** ** ***** or **** ****** ** ******.
  2. ******/******* ************, ** ***** ********* **********, **********, ** ********* ********** funding ** **** ******* *********. ***** ************ **** **** ** increase ********* ***-** *** ****** ********** ** *** ****** ************ system, ** ********* **** **** ********.

Comments (5)

This article conflates terrorism and crime, which are two different things with differing targets. While nearly all terrorism is criminal, not all crime is terrorism.

There are many definitions of terrorism. However, one common aspect of most definitions is that terrorism has a political purpose. Common crime does not. Toward this end, terrorists usually choose high visibility targets such as those outlined in this article:

  • Event Facilities: Large gathering spaces such as stadiums, arenas, convention halls, and even large school auditoriums where public events were held
  • Schools: Both primary and secondary schools, as well as higher education
  • Critical Infrastructure: Water supplies, electrical generation facilities, bridges, etc.

Besides rarely having a political purpose, common crime generally tries to be less readily apparent: poorly lit areas, at night, with few witnesses present.

So that cameras funded by DHS for antiterrorism are not placed in high crime areas makes perfect sense.

Disclaimer: This is my personal opinion and not necessarily that of my employer.

So that cameras funded by DHS for antiterrorism are not placed in high crime areas makes perfect sense.

Sure, we agree that DHS, by design, does not place cameras in high crime areas. The point is that terrorism has proven to be much less of a threat than garden variety crime and that those DHS funded cameras do not help as much as cameras designed and deployed for 'regular' crime.

Yes, but can they simply be relocated from their originally intended aims (anti-terrorism) without violating the grant from which they were funded and continue to be funded, even if the new locations are deemed a better service to the public?

I agree with you that terrorism is not an existential threat.

Whatever existential threat terrorism wields, it is only acting as a catalyst. Just as your body can overreact to a honeybee sting, killing itself in the process (anaphylaxis), terrorism's most tangible damage is that which its target inflicts upon itself in response.

The New York Times estimates the actual cost of the September 11 terror attacks at $55 Billion. Since then, the United States has spent $3.3 Trillion in response, sixty times as much. The political and psychological effect of terrorism is to magnify the threat much like an immune response gone haywire.

The point of the article is that cameras placed for antiterrorism are not in high crime areas. I was attempting to explain why this is by design and not by mistake.

Disclaimer: This is my personal opinion and not necessarily that of my employer.

I was attempting to explain why this is by design and not by mistake.

Again, we understand that this was by design. The point is, as you acknowledge in your response above, it has turned out to be a mistake in the greater scheme of things.

In other words, some things can be 'by design' and still turn out to be a mistake that would benefit from change. This is not meant politically, but as a observation on how cameras are used by cities.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
Motorola Acquires VaaS / Vigilant LPR on Jan 08, 2019
Less than a year after Motorola Solutions spent a billion to acquire Avigilon, the company has made another major acquisition spending nearly a...
European Startup Ajax Profile - They "Stand Against Evil" on Jan 03, 2019
European intrusion detection startup Ajax Systems proclaims: How are they standing against evil? And what are the differentiators and potential...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 - Alarm.com, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...
Combating Vaping Epidemic - Halo Smart Sensor Profile on Dec 21, 2018
Youth vaping has become an epidemic, according to the US Surgeon General, while the market leader, Juul, just received a $12.8 billion investment...
SS&Si Claims To Be "The New Face of Security Distribution" on Dec 03, 2018
Can 27-year-old Jake Voll disrupt the security distribution giants? He has positioned his company SS&Si as the 'NEW FACE' of...
Haven Targets School Security with Lockdown Lineup on Nov 08, 2018
Haven, a US startup founded in 2014 as a residential-focused company, has now raised funding and is offering a lineup of commercial grade locks for...
Ubiquiti Protect Video Surveillance Profile on Nov 07, 2018
Ubiquiti has now been in the video surveillance market for 7 years (see our first coverage back in 2011). In that time, the company's revenue has...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact