The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs

By John Honovich and Charles Rollet, Published on Jun 17, 2019

Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still image cameras', thereby saving them millions.

tariff scheme

Technologically, it is baseless. The 'principal' function of an IP camera is to capture and stream video to a recording device (such as NVRs or VMSes). At best, even with an SD card on-board, saving 'still images' locally is an ancillary function that is very rarely used.

Should this be legal? Is this legal?

Inside this note, we examine this trend, including:

  • Background
  • Sudden Increase
  • Shipping Records of Hikvision and Swann examined
  • Importer Feedback
  • Legal Or Not?
  • Legal Consequences
  • Customs Responds

Background: HS Codes

Goods imported to the US are classified according to an official list of thousands of HS codes. However, there is no obvious code for security cameras. An IPVM review of IP camera import records since 2010 indicates the products have typically been considered 8525.80.30, or "Television cameras, digital cameras and video camera recorders", which has a general tariff rate of 0.5%.

Some importers attempted to get Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) to classify IP cameras as 8525.80.40, or "digital still image video cameras", which has zero tariffs, the legacy of a 1996 WTO pact intended to encourage trade in IT products by eliminating tariffs. The importers' argument was that the surveillance camera had two functions: not only capturing live images/video, but also taking and storing still images, chiefly via an internal SD card.

In the past, CBP rejected this, since the main purpose of security cameras is obviously to stream video to an external device. For example, in 2012, CBP ruled that a Samsung Techwin PTZ dome camera could not be considered a "digital still image video camera" even if it saved still images internally because:

these are multifunctional cameras with the principal function being performed by the capturing of real-time images [i.e. video], which are then transmitted to a location outside the camera for viewing and recording [emphasis added]

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

In that ruling, CBP said the appropriate classification was 8525.80.30.

Trump Tariffs Spark Sudden Increase

Once the Trump administration's 10% China tariffs came into effect on September 24, 2018, suddenly, numerous IP camera imports started being classified as 8525.80.40, or "digital still image video cameras".

The reason is obvious: the "digital still image video cameras" category was left out of the official tariffs list. However, 8525.80.30 (television, digital cameras, etc) was included, thus becoming subject to 10% tariffs, which increased to 25% this May.

Import Data: Swann, Hikvision

Numerous instances of the rise of IP cameras being classified as "digital still image video cameras" since the tariffs were enacted were found in the private customs data website Import Genius.

Swann, owned by Infinova, was a clear example. 60 separate import shipments to Swann Communications USA used the "digital still image video camera" classification for IP cameras after the tariffs, as the excerpt below demonstrates:

Swann Standardizes On 'Digital Still Image'

However, prior to the tariffs, Swann did not once use 'digital still image' nor the code for this category, as the excerpt below shows:

Swann No Use of 'Digital Still Image'

Swann's case is so obvious because they were one of the few manufacturers to actually show both detailed descriptions and tariff codes. Swann did not respond to our request for comment.

Review 250 Swann import records from May 2018 to May 2019 here.

A similar trend (on a smaller scale) could be seen for Hikvision importers:

  • 4 separate imports of Hikvision cameras by Trenton Technology used the "digital still image video camera" classification after the tariffs, but not once prior.
  • 4 separate shipments of Hikvision cameras by Global Network Security used the "digital still image video camera" classification after the tariffs, but not once prior.
  • 2 separate imports of Hikvision cameras by Avalonix used the "digital still image video camera" classification after the tariffs, but not once prior.

Tip of the Iceberg

The shipping records cited from Import Genius show only a fraction of what is happening since most import records do not include the specific HS category, just general product descriptions (often vaguely described as cameras or monitor probes, etc.).

Importer Feedback

Most of the 10 video surveillance importers IPVM spoke with were aware of this tactic, though a few seemed genuinely surprised, noting that they could not understand how their competitors could not raise prices until we informed them of this.

Interestingly, among those that knew about this, most expressed concerns about it working. Many companies mentioned discussing this with Hikvision and anecdotes from others where IP cameras sometimes were accepted as 'digital still image cameras' but other times they were held up, requiring payment of tariffs for 8525.80.30 or requiring hiring a lawyer to protest with uncertain timing and outcome.

However, this was certainly tempting for importers. Many IP cameras come with SD card slots as they add minimal expense. Indeed, one tactic recommended was to add an SD card slot but not wire it up, making it even cheaper, though fake. The thinking here was that even if customs was to open up the camera housing, they would, at worst, look to see that an SD card slot was there, not testing if it actually worked (which is not a major risk with users since they are so rarely used).

As one importer, who says he did not use this tactic, explained:

I was so happy, I was on board. But I emailed my lawyer, my shipping broker, both came back to me and said NOPE. Don’t do it, it’s a crime.

Legal Or Not?

For complex legal reasons, calling IP cameras "Digital Still Image Video Camera" is not a clear-cut case of customs fraud, i.e. lying about a product in order to dodge tariffs, according to trade experts who spoke with IPVM.

Rather, as long as the SD card slots are real and not fake, this could be presented as a case of legitimate "tariffs engineering", i.e. modifying a product to gain preferential rates. Tariff engineering, within certain constraints, is legal and is even advertised as a service by law firms.

How Surveillance Cameras Became "Digital Still Image Video Cameras"

As mentioned above, in 2012 CBP ruled that a Techwin surveillance camera was clearly not a "digital still image video camera" since its "principal function" was to stream video to a remote location.

However, in a case brought by Hikvision, in 2017 CBP ruled that several Hikvision IP camera models with still image storage capability could be classified as "Digital Still Image Video Camera".

The case explains the issue when multiple functions are present:

"Composite machines consisting of two or more machines fitted together to form a whole and other machines designed for the purpose of performing two or more complementary or alternative functions are to be classified as if consisting only of that component or as being that machine which performs the principal function." [emphasis added]

However, in the case, the CBP could not determine the "principal function" of the Hikvision cameras:

"The instant cameras contain no features that predominate over any other features. As such, we are unable to determine the principal functions of the cameras. " [emphasis added]

There are two main reasons for this switch, trade lawyer Lawrence M. Friedman told IPVM:

  • In 2013, the US International Trade Court ruled that a Sony camcorder could be classified as a digital still image video camera, rejecting CBP's legal argument that the camcorder's "principal function" was to stream video. This significantly undermined the 2012 CBP case, as the USITC has the final say on customs matters.
  • "Principal function" is not the same as intended use. CBP bases its classification rulings on the physical characteristics of a product. Since the main components of a surveillance camera (lens, sensor, power supply) can be used for all its functions, in 2017, CBP was unable to decide which was the "principal" one.

The result is that any IP camera with an inbuilt image recording ability can be considered a "digital still image video camera." Most likely, this even includes cameras that only record video on an SD card, but not still images. In its 2017 ruling, CBP defined "images" as either still or moving, and the key distinction was between TV/surveillance cameras that "do not have any inbuilt capability of recording images" vs. "digital cameras" which do. Additionally, in 2014, CBP rejected an attempt to classify a security camera as a "digital still image video camera" in part because it "does not permanently record video internally [emphasis added]". To be sure, since CBP has never made a ruling about a camera that internally only records video but not still images, this interpretation is not definitive.

Principal Function of IP Cameras Clear

While IP cameras can be used for recording still images, recording video internally, controlling garage doors, counting people, and more, the principal function is clear, not just based on end usage but on how the device is specified.

For example, the user manual of the first camera Hikvision listed in their CPB petition (the DS-2CD2532F-IS) is 165 pages long, of which one page is dedicated to recording still images:

The same manual has dozens of pages dedicated to streaming video over networks and these pages are at the very front.

While this tactic is baffling to those that understand the technology, this is not a unique occurrence. The US government was convinced to exclude IP cameras from 'Buy American' protection in 2016, when the US SIA, backed by Hikvision, contended that IP cameras could be 'employed without using the 'lens and image sensor':

While this logic is poor (i.e., a camera without a lens and imager is as much a camera as a car without an engine and wheels), manufacturers often get away with such tactics.

Potential Legal Outcome

Doug Jacobson, another trade lawyer IPVM interviewed, said that if CBP does decide that IP cameras are being misclassified as "Digital Still Video Image Cameras", it has the power to reverse course and even charge any missed tariffs, plus interest, for up to 5 years.

However, no penalty is imposed if the importer exercised "reasonable care", a legal term for proof that the importer used an "expert" like a lawyer, consultant, or broker for the determination, or referred to a prior ruling.

CBP Response

IPVM asked CBP specifically whether it thought IP cameras were being misclassified as digital still video image cameras, however, we received a vague reply leaving the response unclear:

CBP is closely monitoring Chinese imports subject to Section 301 to ensure that the duties are correctly filed. Section 301 duties are based on the HTS classification of the imported Chinese goods. Importers who misclassify subject goods in a HTS classification not subject to Section 301 duties may be subject to civil penalties under 19 USC 1592. If an import is correctly classified in a HTS classification that is not covered by Section 301 duties, then no Section 301 duties are due.

The civil penalties CBP is referring to are stiff civil penalties, anywhere from two times the tariffs lost up to the total value of the goods imported if they prove reasonable care was not exercised.

We followed up with CBP, once again asking our original question about possible misclassification, but have yet to hear back. We will update if they do.


Clearly, the principal function of IP cameras is not to take still images or video on an SD card. However, US importers, thanks in part to a complaint brought by Hikvision itself, have avoided untold sums by exploiting this.

However, this may not last forever. If the trade war is not resolved and the Trump administration passes the final round of tariffs, this would impose a 25% tariff on almost all imports from China, including "digital still image video cameras."

Comments (72) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Access Control and Video Integration Statistics 2020 on Oct 08, 2020
Video Surveillance and Access Control are two of the most common security...
China's SMIC Hit By US Trade Restrictions, Impact On Video Surveillance on Oct 13, 2020
US trade restrictions have hit Semiconductor Manufacturing International...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
Beware Rigged China Fever Cameras on Sep 08, 2020
Many China fever camera manufacturers have rigged algorithms dynamically...
Mobile Access Control Usage Statistics 2020 on Sep 21, 2020
Most smartphones can be used as access control credentials, but how...
Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now,...
The Guide To The NDAA Video Surveillance Ban / Blacklists on Aug 24, 2020
This 25-page guide provides a reference to the NDAA ban and blacklist. The US...
CDW Sells School District 36 Low-Res, No Blackbody Hikvision Fever Cameras With Federal Funds on Oct 01, 2020
Mega IT distributor CDW sold low-resolution Hikvision fever cameras with no...
Drain Wire For Access Control Reader Tutorial on Sep 23, 2020
An easy-to-miss cabling specification plays a key role in access control, yet...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Hanwha and Hikvision Selling H.265 Without HEVC Licensing on Aug 19, 2020
IPVM has confirmed that Hanwha and Hikvision do not have H.265 licenses from...
Axis Compares Fever Camera Sellers to 9/11 on Sep 18, 2020
Axis Communications, the West's largest surveillance camera manufacturer, has...
China Bems Temperature Measurement Terminal Tested on Sep 22, 2020
Guangzhou Bems (brand Benshi) is the manufacturer behind temperature...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...

Recent Reports

Consultants Online Show LIVE Today! on Oct 27, 2020
IPVM's 7th online show will feature 20+ consultants and recruiters presenting...
Eagle Eye Networks Raises $40 Million on Oct 27, 2020
Eagle Eye has raised $40 million aiming to "reinvent video...
Hikvision Q3 2020 Global Revenue Rises, US Revenue Falls on Oct 27, 2020
While Hikvision's global revenue rises driven by domestic recovery, its US...
VICE Investigates Verkada's Harassing "RawVerkadawgz" on Oct 26, 2020
This month, IPVM investigated Verkada's sexism, discrimination, and cultural...
Six Flags' FDA Violating Outdoor Dahua Fever Cameras on Oct 26, 2020
As Six Flags scrambled to reopen parks amid plummeting revenues caused by the...
ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...
Nokia Fever Screening Claims To "Advance Fight Against COVID-19" on Oct 22, 2020
First IBM, then briefly Clorox, and now Nokia becomes the latest Fortune 500...
Deceptive Meridian Temperature Tablets Endanger Public Safety on Oct 21, 2020
IPVM's testing of and investigation into Meridian Kiosk's temperature...
Honeywell 30 Series and Vivotek NVRs Tested on Oct 21, 2020
The NDAA ban has driven many users to look for low-cost NVRs not made by...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...