Surveillance Camera Imager Tutorial

Author: John Honovich, Published on Dec 23, 2016

Imagers - CCD, CMOS, 1/2", 1/4", big pixels, small pixels, etc.

In this tutorial, we explain the fundamental issues and drivers in surveillance camera imagers, including:

  • Sensor vs Imager
  • CCD vs CMOS
  • Imager Manufacturers
  • Camera Manufacturer Imager Disclosure
  • Imager vs Resolution
  • Imager Size
  • Pixel Size
  • Imager vs FoV Width
  • Imager vs Low Light Performance

Plus, we provide a 7 question quiz at the end to test your knowledge.

******* - ***, ****, */*", */*", *** ******, ***** ******, etc.

** **** ********, ** ******* *** *********** ****** *** ******* in ************ ****** *******, *********:

  • ****** ** ******
  • *** ** ****
  • ****** *************
  • ****** ************ ****** **********
  • ****** ** **********
  • ****** ****
  • ***** ****
  • ****** ** *** *****
  • ****** ** *** ***** ***********

****, ** ******* * * ******** **** ** *** *** to **** **** *********.

[***************]

Sensor ** ******

******** ****** ************* **** ***** ********** '******' ** '******'. **** referring ** ************ *******, **** **** *** **** *****, ******, technically, ** ****** ** * ******** **** ** ******. ******* of ****, ** **** ********* ***** ** '******' **** ******** about ************ *******.

CCD ** ****

*** *** **** ********** ***** ** ******* **** **** *** and ****.

*****, ** ****, ********* *** ************ ******* *** ****, **** the **** '****' ** *** '*****'. **** ** *** ******** of * ****** ***, **** *** ******* **** *********** *** CMOS *** ****** **** **** ** * ***** ****, ***** quality ***********.

******* *** **** *** ******, * ********* ******* ******* ****. However, **** ** *****, ********** ***, ** * ********* ******, impossible. ** *** **** ****** *** *******, *** ***** ********* almost *** ****** ************ *******, ********* *** '***' ****** *** models.

Imager *************

***** *** **** * *** *********** ************* ** ************ *******, with *** **** ********** ***** *******************,********* ****. **** ****** *************, ****** ************* ***** * ***** of ****** **** ******* ****, *** **********, ***** **** *** WDR ************, ** **** * ***.

Camera ************ ****** **********

****** ************* ***************** ****** ************ / ****** **** ***, ** ** ** not **** ** ******* *** ******* ***** ** ***** *******. Some **** **** *** ****** ************ *** *** *** ******** model. *** *******, **** ** *** **** ** *** ** Omnivision, ********** ***** ****** ** ******* **** ******* ***** / performance *********. ********, **** ** *** **** * ******* **** using *** ***** **** ****** (***** ** ****, ** ********), differences ** ******, ******** *** *********** ***** ***** ****** ** noticeable ******* ***********.

Imager ** **********

******* **** ** *** ******* ********** **** *******. **** ********** the ******'* ******* **********. **** ******* *** *** ** ***, 1.3MP, ***, ***, ***. ********, ** / **** ******* **** emerged ***** ** ******* ** ****** ** *******.

Imager ****

******* *** ***** **** ********* ***** (*.*., *****) ** ********* small (*.*., **** ******). ************ ****** ******* **** ** **** in *** ******, ******, *** ********* ******, **** **** ***** imagers.

*** ***** ***** ***** *********** ****** ****. *** *** ****** ones ** *** **** *** ****** *** ******** *** ************. The *** ** *** ***** (*/*.*") ** ******** ***** ****** large *** ******* ************ *******:

**************, **% ** ******* **** ******* **** *** ******* */*" and */*". *** **** ****** ****** **** ** ************ ** ~1/3", **** */*.*" *** */*.*" ******. **********, ***** ********** ****** (720p/1.3MP *** *****) ***** **** ******* */*" *******, *** **** these ****** ************* *** */*" ******* *****.

********** ****** ****

**** *** **** *** *****, *** ******* ****** **** *** increased **********. ** *********** ********, ***, ***, ***, **, ***., imager ***** ****** **** */*" *** ********** ******** **** ******.

**** ** */*" ***** *******

*** **** ********* ****** ***** ** ****** **** **** ** the **** ** */*" ***** *******. **** ************* *** **** at ***** *** "**** ***" ***** ***** * ~*/*" (** 1/1.8", */*.*", ***.) ******, ******** *** ***** *** *****.

****** **** */*" ***** ****

******* ****** **** */*" *** ***** **** **** ** ************, with **** * ******* ** *******. ********'* *** ****** ** best ***** *** ***** *** ** ***** ******* (**.***/~*.**"), *** others **** ****** ********* ** **** *********, **** ******'* **** *****, *** *******/***** ***-* *********** *** ****.

Size **********

****** ****** ************, ****** **** ** ****** ****** ********* ** camera ************* ** ************* ******. **** ** ** ******* ** the ***** ** ****** ********* ********:

Pixel ****

******* **** ** *** **** ** ***** ******, ******** ** microns.

***** **** ** **** ******** ********** ** ****** **** *** number ** ****** (*.*., **********). *** ****** *** ******, ********** else *****, *** ****** *** ***** ****. *******, ** *** add **** ****** (*.*., ***** **** ** ** **) *** the ****** **** ***** *** ****, *** ***** **** *********.

****'* ** ******* **** ** ****** ************* ******* ****** ****, resolution *** ***** **** **** ** ****:

**** ****** ****** ***** ***** *******, ********** **** *****, * larger ***** *** ******* **** *****, *** ********* ******* ******** / ****** *** ***** ******. *******, **** ***** ******* ****** low ***** *********** ** ** ** *** ****** / **** to ******** *** ****** ** ****** **** ******* ***** ** pixel ****.

****, ***** **** ** ****** ***** ********* ** ****** *************, so *** **** *** *** ** ** ******** ** ******* at *** ********** *** ****** **** ** **** *****.

** ***** ****

** ******* *** ************ ******. ******** **** **** ~** *** pixels ** ***** ******* *** ** ****** ******* *** ********* larger **** *****, ********* *** ***** **** *** ** ******* is *******. **** *** **** *** ***** ***********. ****, ** we ******* *******, ****** ** ***** ********** **** **** ** cameras.

Imager **** ** *** *****

****** **** *** * ****** ****** ***** *****. *** ******* *********** ** *** ** **** ****** (*.*., 3mm, ****, ****, ***.).

*******, *** ****** *** ******, ********** **** *****, *** ****** the ***.

** *** ***** ****, ****** ***** ** ************ ** *** vary **** ****, ** **** **** ******* ********* ****** *****, the *** **** ******* **********. *** *******:

** ****, ** ********* ** *** * ***** *******, *** is ***** ***** ***** **.

Imager ** ******

******* **** ******* ** ** **** *********** ***** (*.*., *.***,*****, ***.). ******* *** ********* ****** ***** ******* ** **** they ******* *** *** ****** ***** *** ***** ************ ** the ** ******* / ****** ** * **** (***) ** perform ****.

Imager ** *** ***** ***********

******* *** ** ****, *** *********, *** **** ******, ****** in ******* ** **** ****** ******* ****** ******* ****** *** light ***********. ****** ****** ******* ****, ***** *** ***** *** drivers **** ********* *** **** *********, ****** *** ***** ***** processing **** ** **** ** *** ******* / *** ** the ******. **** *** ***** **** ** ********* **** ** *** ***** *********** *****.

*******, *** ***** */*" ***** ****************** *** *** ******** ********* ****** **** *** *** */*" ***** *******, ** these ****** ********* ***** *** **** (** ******) ********** **** in */*" ****** ** ****** */*" ******* **** ****** ***********, resulting ** ******* ****** ***********. *** *** ***** ******' */*" ***** ******,***** ********* */*" ******,********* ***********, ********** */*" ******* *** ********* ********.

************, ***** *** * ****** ** */*" ****** ******* ********* lacking ***** ********** **** *** ***** **** ** *** *****. Also, * ****** ** ** ******* **** */*" ******* ** larger, *** *** ***** *** ** *** ***** ******* *** pixel **** ** ****** ***** *** *** ******* **** ** lack *** ********** ***** ** ******* **** ***** ***********.

Quiz ********

**** *** * ******** **** *** *** *** **** *** know *******.

Updated ****

**** **** *** ********** ******** ** **** *** *** ******* in **** ** ******* ************ ** */*" ******* *** ** cameras.

Comments (9)

Hi, I want to share the following information; as far as I know, increasing the pixel size will decrease the spatial resolution. I'm quoting form the following link "Images having higher spatial resolution are composed with a greater number of pixels than those of lower spatial resolution"

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/digitalimaging/processing/spatialresolution/

"increasing the pixel size will decrease the spatial resolution"

That's true, assuming the imager size stays the same, simply because the total area is constant but the size of the components (i.e., pixels) have expanded. Bigger pixels in the same space means fewer total pixels, i.e., spatial resolution.

Btw, this is a tautology:

"Images having higher spatial resolution are composed with a greater number of pixels than those of lower spatial resolution"

This is true, by the definition of spatial resolution. However, it does not mean it has better image quality - Pixels Determine Potential, Not Quality

In surveillance, 95% of cameras have imagers that are between 1/2" and 1/4". The most common imager size in surveillance is 1/3".

Is that the horizontal size or diagonal size, or area?

The imager size is convention, not an actual measurement.

From the wikpedia page on image sensor format:

"Sensor formats of digital cameras are mostly expressed in the non-standardized "inch" system as approximately 1.5 times the length of the diagonal of the sensor. "

For example, a 1/4" imager has a diameter of 4mm (or .157 inches). Multiplied by 1.5 gives nearly 1/4".

Here's an excerpt from the wikipedia table on imager size dimensions:

So it's kinda like a shared fairy tale that all the manufacturers tell round the campfire? Who gets stuck holding the "short end" of the stick?

At the risk of being pesky, there is a mighty odd thing going on there in that thar chart, where whenever the inch size denominator is an integer, the diagonal measurement is an integer too, but in mm. I can't think of how the heck that could happen except by chance?

One more for the road, does that mean that a 1/4" sensor is will always be having the same aspect ratio, or is that chart just a one example of what it could be? Thanks for the lesson.

Jim, I'm a little surprised at your surprise; after all you were the first person to answer a similar question correctly, (though looking back, you did say you "cheated" :)

I never really found a satisfactory answer to how it came to be, but I don't think it's to 'hoodwink' anybody. What I did learn was that 'back in the day' , way before IP cams, the CCD sensor was surrounded by some kind of vacuum tube (help tube expert!) thingy that made the diagonal size of the whole component "1/4 or whatever. But of course the active sensor size was smaller. Then they stopped using the tubes, and started making smaller packages, just because they could.

My guess us when that started, they had to agree on the active dimensions of the old packages, and for some reason (help, fab expert), did that in mm. And that married the even inches to the even mm. Maybe John or somebody knows more. But its just history that's unimportant now, and like Brian basically said the only thing you need to know is you is that you don't know the exact size by the fractional inch thing, its just a convention.

****Quiz Spoiler alert****

Pixel size is the best metric to gauge low light performance.

Objection: the explanation to the answer does not give us any better metric than pixel size, saying

Pixel size is rarely disclosed, so it is hard to use as a metric. One can estimate it by contrasting resolution and imager size.

But since resolution and imager size are almost always present, one can almost always derive it thru simple division. Or add the calculation to the camera calculator, it's as easy as PPF.

However, even with that, low light quality varies greatly depending on image processing

Image processing is not a metric.

and integrated IR usage.

Most cameras, according to the finder, do not have IR, and therefore this might be hard to use as a metric.

Also, strictly speaking IR removes the low-light condition by adding (IR) light. In the case of the (few) cameras with integrated visible light, we would probably not say it had 'good low-light performance', rather we would say it had a 'good light'.

Did you have another metric that is better than pixel size?

On the other hand, imager sizes in surveillance do not vary that much, so even with notably different imager sizes, the FoV only changes moderately.

Just to note, the change in FoV width is directly proportional to the change in sensor width, and inversely to focal length. In the example, a 1/3 format sensor has 75% of the width of a 1/2 format sensor.

With an imager twice as wide you would have a FOV twice as wide as well.

With a focal length twice as long you would have a FOV half as wide.

Of course imager sizes don't vary any where near the degree focal lengths do, which makes focal length more of a practical determinant.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Amazon Rekognition Facial Detection Tested on Dec 03, 2018
Amazon's Rekognition service has announced improvements, that if accurate, would be a significant advance over conventional facial detection. In...
Genetec Privacy Protector Tested on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...
Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...
Building Occupancy Codes and Access Control Tutorial on Nov 01, 2018
A building or room's classification can greatly impact which building codes must be followed. In terms of access control, these 'occupancy codes'...
Camera Course January 2019 on Nov 01, 2018
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
Axxon Face Search Tested on Oct 26, 2018
AxxonSoft has brought facial recognition to their Axxon Next VMS for free with the simply named Face Search, claiming to allow users to find...
Hanwha Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (PNM-7000VD) on Oct 18, 2018
Hanwha has introduced their first dual-imager model, the PNM-7000VD, a twin 1080p model featuring independently positionable sensors and a snap-in...
Dahua Face Recognition Camera Tested on Oct 15, 2018
Dahua has been one of the industry's most vocal proponents of the value that AI creates: As part of this, Dahua has released a facial...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Sep 27, 2018
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of physical security is the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Often,...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Dahua USA Sales Team Cuts - 'Strategic Right Sizing' on Dec 18, 2018
Dahua USA finishes a tumultuous year in which it acquired the Flir SMB business, was subject to the US government ban, terminated and restructured...
This Brooklyn Storefont Sells Millions In Uniview And Hikvision on Dec 18, 2018
Looking at their Brooklyn headquarters for this "CCTV Manufacturer", it is not much: Inside, it is not better: However, this company is one...
ACRE-Acquired Open Options Access Company Profile on Dec 17, 2018
Who is the company ACRE is acquiring? In this note, we examine Open Options line for best customer fit, key features, pricing, and main...
Open Options Acquired By ACRE on Dec 17, 2018
ACRE is doing deals again. A year after they sold Mercury, they are buying another access control company - Open Options. In this note, we...
8MP / 4K Fixed Lens Camera Shootout - Dahua, Hikvision, TVT, Uniview on Dec 17, 2018
8MP / 4K fixed lens models are now common in lower cost lines, with nearly every Chinese brand and their OEMs now offering multiple options. To...
Network Cable Shootout - Belden, Commscope, Hikvision, Honeywell, NavePoint CCA, Windy City Wire on Dec 17, 2018
Every IP camera install needs UTP cabling. But how much of a difference is there between dirt cheap generic cables found online and the bigger,...
Hikvision Government Parent Holds Communist Party Congress on Dec 17, 2018
The Communist Party committee of Hikvision’s government parent, CETHIK, held a Party Congress earlier this month where senior executives, including...
Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference 2018 Review - ADT, Resideo, Alarm.com, Arlo, Eagle Eye, ACRE, More on Dec 14, 2018
Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference is an event matching industry executives with financiers that frequently leads to future funding...
Cisco Meraki New Cameras and AI Analytics on Dec 14, 2018
Meraki has released their second generation of video surveillance with 3 new cameras, AI-based video analytics, and 2 cloud-based storage...
Foolish Strategy: OEMing Facial Recognition on Dec 13, 2018
Almost as 'hot' as face recognition marketing right now is OEMing facial recognition. Last year, they were a who's who of company's with...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact