Surveillance Camera Imager Tutorial

By: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 23, 2016

Imagers - CCD, CMOS, 1/2", 1/4", big pixels, small pixels, etc.

In this tutorial, we explain the fundamental issues and drivers in surveillance camera imagers, including:

  • Sensor vs Imager
  • CCD vs CMOS
  • Imager Manufacturers
  • Camera Manufacturer Imager Disclosure
  • Imager vs Resolution
  • Imager Size
  • Pixel Size
  • Imager vs FoV Width
  • Imager vs Low Light Performance

Plus, we provide a 7 question quiz at the end to test your knowledge.

imager free image4

******* - ***, ****, 1/2", */*", *** ******, small ******, ***.

** **** ********, ** explain *** *********** ****** and ******* ** ************ camera *******, *********:

  • ****** ** ******
  • *** ** ****
  • ****** *************
  • ****** ************ ****** **********
  • ****** ** **********
  • ****** ****
  • ***** ****
  • ****** ** *** *****
  • ****** ** *** ***** Performance

****, ** ******* * 7 ******** **** ** the *** ** **** your *********.

imager free image4

[***************]

Sensor ** ******

******** ****** ************* **** these ********** '******' ** 'imager'. **** ********* ** surveillance *******, **** **** the **** *****, ******, technically, ** ****** ** a ******** **** ** sensor. ******* ** ****, we **** ********* ***** to '******' **** ******** about ************ *******.

CCD ** ****

*** *** **** ********** types ** ******* **** been *** *** ****.

*****, ** ****, ********* all ************ ******* *** CMOS, **** *** **** 'best' ** *** '*****'. This ** *** ******** of * ****** ***, when *** ******* **** predominant *** **** *** looked **** **** ** a ***** ****, ***** quality ***********.

******* *** **** *** better, * ********* ******* against ****. *******, **** is *****, ********** ***, as * ********* ******, impossible. ** *** **** choose *** *******, *** would ********* ****** *** modern ************ *******, ********* the '***' ****** *** models.

**** **** ***** *** still *** ******* **** in **** ********** ************, such ** *** ** machine ******, *** **** these ************ **** **** increased *** ** ****.

Imager *************

***** *** **** * few *********** ************* ** surveillance *******, **** *** most ********** ***** *******************, ****** *** ****. Like ****** *************, ****** manufacturers ***** * ***** of ****** **** ******* size, *** **********, ***** rate *** *** ************, to **** * ***.

Camera ************ ****** **********

****** ************* ***************** ****** ************ / models **** ***, ** it ** *** **** to ******* *** ******* based ** ***** *******. Some **** **** *** imager ************ *** *** the ******** *****. *** example, **** ** *** knew ** *** ************, ********** ***** ****** of ******* **** ******* price / *********** *********. Moreover, **** ** *** knew * ******* **** using *** ***** **** imager (***** ** ****, in ********), *********** ** tuning, ******** *** *********** could ***** ****** ** noticeable ******* ***********.

Imager ** **********

******* **** ** *** maximum ********** **** *******. This ********** *** ******'* overall **********. **** ******* max *** ** ***, 1.3MP, ***, ***, ***. Recently, ** / **** sensors **** ******* ***** is ******* ** ****** 4K *******.

Imager ****

******* *** ***** **** extremely ***** (*.*., *****) to ********* ***** (*.*., cell ******). ************ ****** imagers **** ** **** in *** ******, ******, but ********* ******, **** cell ***** *******.

*** ***** ***** ***** contrasting ****** ****. *** two ****** ******* ** the **** *** ****** are ******** *** ************, while *** *** ** the ***** (*/*.*") ** actually ***** ****** ***** for ******* ************ *******, but **** **** ******* to *******:

imager size comparison

** ************, **% ** cameras **** ******* **** are ******* */*" *** 1/4". *** **** ****** imager ***** ** *** models ** ************ */*.*", 1/2.7", *** */*". **********, lower ********** ****** (****/*.*** and *****) ***** **** smaller */*" *******, *** even ***** ****** ************* use ******* ****** ** 1/3" *****.

********** ****** ****

**** *** **** *** years, *** ******* ****** size *** ********* **********. As *********** ******** ** 4MP, ***, **, ***., imager ***** ****** **** 1/3" *** ********** ******** more ******.

Rise ** */*"+ *******

*** **** ********* ***** in ****** **** ** the **** ** */*" imagers ** *** **** few *****. **** ************* now **** ** ***** one "**** ***" ***** model ***** * ~*/*" (or */*.*", */*.*", ***.) sensor, ******** *** ***** low *****.

************, ****** ********** *-*** models ***** */*" ** slightly ****** ******* *** now ********** ******, ********* in *************' ****** *********** models, **** ******' ** ***** *** 5MP *****, **** */*.*",****** *** ***-*****(*/*.*"), *********** *** **-*********-****(*/*.*").

Much ****** **** */*" ***** ****

******* ****** **** **** larger **** */*" *** still **** **** ** surveillance, **** **** * handful ** *******.********'* ********* ** **** ***** for ***** *** ** large ******* (**.***/~*.**"), *** others **** **** ******** as ****, **** ******'* **** *****,**** *****(***-*, ~*"), **************'* ***** */* ******.

Imager **** **********

****** ****** ************, ****** size ** ****** ****** disclosed ** ****** ************* on ************* ******. **** is ** ******* ** the ***** ** ****** typically ********:

Pixel ****

******* **** ** *** size ** ***** ******, measured ** *******.

***** **** ** **** strongly ********** ** ****** size *** ****** ** pixels (*.*., **********). *** bigger *** ******, ********** else *****, *** ****** the ***** ****. *******, if *** *** **** pixels (*.*., ***** **** SD ** **) *** the ****** **** ***** the ****, *** ***** size *********.

****'* ** ******* **** an ****** ************* ******* imager ****, ********** *** pixel **** **** ** side:

**** ****** ****** ***** sizes *******, ********** **** equal, * ****** ***** can ******* **** *****, and ********* ******* ******** / ****** *** ***** images. *******, **** ***** factors ****** *** ***** performance ** ** ** not ****** / **** to ******** *** ****** is ****** **** ******* based ** ***** ****.

****, ***** **** ** almost ***** ********* ** camera *************, ** *** best *** *** ** is ******** ** ******* at *** ********** *** imager **** ** **** model.

4K ******* ********* ******* ***** ****

** ******* *** ************ common. ******** **** **** ~4x *** ****** ** 1080p ******* *** ** camera ******* *** ********* larger **** *****, ********* the ***** **** *** 4K ******* ** *******. This *** **** *** light ***********. ****, ** we ******* *******, ****** in ***** ********** **** hurt ** *******.

**** **** **** ** not ****** *** ****, notably ** ***** ***** imager ****** **** ** Canon ** ****'* **** models, ****' ***-* *****, etc., ***** *** ****** imager **** ********* ***** size ***************.

Imager **** ** *** *****

****** **** *** * modest ****** ** ***** of **** ****** *****. *** ******* *********** of *** ** **** length (*.*., ***, ****, 30mm, ***.).

*******, *** ****** *** imager, ********** **** *****, the ***** *** ***** of ****.

** *** ***** ****, imager ***** ** ************ do *** **** **** much, ** **** **** notably ********* ****** *****, the *** **** ******* moderately. *** *******:

larger imager size wider angle of view

** ****, ** ********* is *** * ***** concern, *** ** ***** being ***** **.

Imager ** ******

******* **** ******* ** do **** *********** ***** (i.e., *.***,*****, ***.). ******* *** certainly ****** ***** ******* by **** **** ******* but *** ****** ***** the ***** ************ ** the ** ******* / System ** **** (***) to ******* ****.

Imager ** *** ***** ***********

******* *** ** ****, the *********, *** **** flawed, ****** ** ******* is **** ****** ******* always ******* ****** *** light ***********. ****** ****** imagers ****, ***** *** other *** ******* **** typically *** **** *********, namely *** ***** ***** processing **** ** **** by *** ******* / CPU ** *** ******. IPVM *** ***** **** in ********* **** ** *** light *********** *****.

*******, *** ***** */*" 1080p ****************** *** *** ******** ********* ****** **** the *** */*" ***** cameras, ** ***** ****** typically ***** *** **** (or ******) ********** **** in */*" ****** ** larger */*" ******* **** better ***********, ********* ** overall ****** ***********. *** our ***** ******' */*" ***** ******,***** ********* */*" ******,********* ***********, ********** */*" ******* *** Camera*** ********.

************, ***** *** * number ** */*" ****** cameras ********* ******* ***** processing **** *** ***** poor ** *** *****. Also, * ****** ** 4K ******* **** */*" imagers ** ******, *** are ***** *** ** low ***** ******* *** pixel **** ** ****** small *** *** ******* tend ** **** *** processing ***** ** ******* such ***** ***********.

Quiz ********

**** *** * ******** quiz *** *** *** well *** **** *******.

Updated ****

**** **** *** ********** released ** **** *** was ******* ** **** and **** ** ******* developments ** */*" *** larger ******* ** **** as *********** ** ** cameras.

Comments (9)

Hi, I want to share the following information; as far as I know, increasing the pixel size will decrease the spatial resolution. I'm quoting form the following link "Images having higher spatial resolution are composed with a greater number of pixels than those of lower spatial resolution"

Molecular Expressions Microscopy Primer: Digital Image Processing - Spatial Resolution - Interactive Tutorial

"increasing the pixel size will decrease the spatial resolution"

That's true, assuming the imager size stays the same, simply because the total area is constant but the size of the components (i.e., pixels) have expanded. Bigger pixels in the same space means fewer total pixels, i.e., spatial resolution.

Btw, this is a tautology:

"Images having higher spatial resolution are composed with a greater number of pixels than those of lower spatial resolution"

This is true, by the definition of spatial resolution. However, it does not mean it has better image quality - Pixels Determine Potential, Not Quality

In surveillance, 95% of cameras have imagers that are between 1/2" and 1/4". The most common imager size in surveillance is 1/3".

Is that the horizontal size or diagonal size, or area?

The imager size is convention, not an actual measurement.

From the wikpedia page on image sensor format:

"Sensor formats of digital cameras are mostly expressed in the non-standardized "inch" system as approximately 1.5 times the length of the diagonal of the sensor. "

For example, a 1/4" imager has a diameter of 4mm (or .157 inches). Multiplied by 1.5 gives nearly 1/4".

Here's an excerpt from the wikipedia table on imager size dimensions:

So it's kinda like a shared fairy tale that all the manufacturers tell round the campfire? Who gets stuck holding the "short end" of the stick?

At the risk of being pesky, there is a mighty odd thing going on there in that thar chart, where whenever the inch size denominator is an integer, the diagonal measurement is an integer too, but in mm. I can't think of how the heck that could happen except by chance?

One more for the road, does that mean that a 1/4" sensor is will always be having the same aspect ratio, or is that chart just a one example of what it could be? Thanks for the lesson.

Jim, I'm a little surprised at your surprise; after all you were the first person to answer a similar question correctly, (though looking back, you did say you "cheated" :)

I never really found a satisfactory answer to how it came to be, but I don't think it's to 'hoodwink' anybody. What I did learn was that 'back in the day' , way before IP cams, the CCD sensor was surrounded by some kind of vacuum tube (help tube expert!) thingy that made the diagonal size of the whole component "1/4 or whatever. But of course the active sensor size was smaller. Then they stopped using the tubes, and started making smaller packages, just because they could.

My guess us when that started, they had to agree on the active dimensions of the old packages, and for some reason (help, fab expert), did that in mm. And that married the even inches to the even mm. Maybe John or somebody knows more. But its just history that's unimportant now, and like Brian basically said the only thing you need to know is you is that you don't know the exact size by the fractional inch thing, its just a convention.

****Quiz Spoiler alert****

Pixel size is the best metric to gauge low light performance.

Objection: the explanation to the answer does not give us any better metric than pixel size, saying

Pixel size is rarely disclosed, so it is hard to use as a metric. One can estimate it by contrasting resolution and imager size.

But since resolution and imager size are almost always present, one can almost always derive it thru simple division. Or add the calculation to the camera calculator, it's as easy as PPF.

However, even with that, low light quality varies greatly depending on image processing

Image processing is not a metric.

and integrated IR usage.

Most cameras, according to the finder, do not have IR, and therefore this might be hard to use as a metric.

Also, strictly speaking IR removes the low-light condition by adding (IR) light. In the case of the (few) cameras with integrated visible light, we would probably not say it had 'good low-light performance', rather we would say it had a 'good light'.

Did you have another metric that is better than pixel size?

On the other hand, imager sizes in surveillance do not vary that much, so even with notably different imager sizes, the FoV only changes moderately.

Just to note, the change in FoV width is directly proportional to the change in sensor width, and inversely to focal length.  In the example, a 1/3 format sensor has 75% of the width of a 1/2 format sensor. 

With an imager twice as wide you would have a FOV twice as wide as well. 

With a focal length twice as long you would have a FOV half as wide.

Of course imager sizes don't vary any where near the degree focal lengths do, which makes focal length more of a practical determinant.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Last Chance - Camera Course Winter 2020 on Jan 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
IPVM Camera Calculator User Manual / Guide on Oct 16, 2019
Learn how to use the IPVM Camera Calculator (updated for Version 3.1). The guide below includes instructions, images, gifs, and videos...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Oct 14, 2019
Camera focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can significantly reduce details, making cameras less effective. In this guide, we...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Lens Focal Length Tutorial on Jul 10, 2019
3mm, 6mm, 2.8 - 9mm, 5 - 50mm, etc. Camera specifications often list lens lengths but what do they mean? These metrics are important in...
Camera Field of View (FoV) Guide on Nov 13, 2019
Field of View (FoV) and Angle of View (AoV), are deceptively complex. At their most basic, they simply describe what the camera can "see" and seem...
Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) Guide on Oct 01, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
2020 Video Surveillance Cameras State Of The Market on Jan 03, 2020
Each year, IPVM explains the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and reporting. This...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
PRC Warns Against China Video Surveillance Hacks, Hikvision Targeted on Feb 14, 2020
Hackers are targeting China video surveillance manufacturers and systems, according to the PRC's main cyber threat monitoring body. The hackers...
IPVM Conference 2020 on Feb 13, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our 2020 conference. This is the first and only industry event that will be 100% sponsor-free. Like IPVM online, the...
Bosch Dropping Dahua on Feb 13, 2020
Bosch has confirmed to IPVM that it is in the process of dropping Dahua, over the next year, as both IP camera contract manufacturer and recorder...
BluB0X Alleges Lenel, S2, Software House Are Dinosaurs on Feb 13, 2020
BluB0X is running an ad campaign labeling Lenel, S2, Software House, Honeywell, AMAG and more as dinosaurs: In a follow-up email to IPVM,...
London Live Police Face Recognition Visited on Feb 13, 2020
London police have officially begun using live facial recognition in select areas of the UK capital, sparking significant controversy. IPVM...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in designing video surveillance systems. Though 'convergence' was a big...
Monitoreal "Completely Autonomous" Home AI Tested on Feb 12, 2020
Monitoreal claims to allow users to "see the things you want (people, vehicles, animals) and ignore the things you don’t”, using AI to distinguish...
Cisco Video Surveillance Is Dead, Long Live Cisco Meraki Video Surveillance on Feb 11, 2020
A dozen years ago much of the industry thought that Cisco was destined to dominate video surveillance. They stumbled repeatedly, failing. Now it is...
BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide on Feb 11, 2020
Spend enough time around networks and eventually someone will mention BICSI, the oft-referenced but only vaguely known standards body prevalent in...