Storage Duration for Surveillance 2012

By: John Honovich, Published on Apr 14, 2012

How long should video surveillance be stored? 1 week, 1 month, 1 year? This is a fundamental question for security systems. Store for too short a time and you could lose critical evidence yet record too long and it could waste a huge amount of money.

In this report, we share in-depth survey results of security integrators from around the world, examining how long and why real world deployments choose to store surveillance video.

Storage Fundamentals

This is part of our unique series on storage fundamentals, helping users make the right decision on the surveillance designs. Related reports include:

The Average

The most common storage duration, by far is 1 month; The next most common is 2 weeks. The histogram below charts the breakdown of integrator responses:

While that's the big picture, we captured many nuances in our survey results, allowing us to answer important questions such as:

  • Why do customers choose a specific storage duration?
  • How does use of megapixel impact storage duration?
  • Do larger projects average lower or higher storage duration lengths?
  • How long are the longest storage durations?
  • What drives long storage durations?
  • What markets are most likely to have extreme storage duration requirements?

Drivers of Storage Duration

Three core drivers impact storage duration:

  • How long it takes for a user to know that surveillance video is needed? Do they know within a few hours (e.g., an assault or a burglarly) or might it take weeks (e.g., reporting a fraudulent bank transaction)?
  • How long does it take to retrieve video? Even if the organization gets the alert within a day or two, they might not be able to retrieve the video for some time. As one respondent noted, "Nobody wants to race a clock inregards to keeping recorded surveillance"
  • How much it costs? With most surveillance systems, surveillance storage costs scale linearly (i.e., if the first month costs $10,000 for storage so does the second, third, fourth, etc.). However, the likelihood that video is needed keeps decreasing over time.

Most incidents are generally known within a few days or a week. Add an extra week for retrieval and that gives 2 weeks of storage. This seems to be the minimum generally accepted. With the clear majority of respondents, 1 month was preferred to provide a margin of error.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Many respondents explained that 2 weeks to a 1 month was an acceptable compromise between maximizing availability and constraining storage costs:

  • "Good balance between too short and too long of a duration"
  • "Good mix of storage requirements and typical incident retrieval time."
  • "Most of it is due to budget restrains where they can't afford the storage upfront for months of storage. A good chunk of our jobs, the client will know fairly quickly something has happened and only need a few days of record time."
  • "Tradeoff of in price (storage) vs necessity."
  • "About 2 weeks. Because is seems to be enough time to find any incident. Most reckon that if they have not need it by the they will not."

However, in the maximum storage duration section below, we examine 4 cases where 2 weeks to a month are not sufficient.

A number of European respondents explicitly cited restrictions on storage for more than 1 month:

  • "1 month which is the maximum allowed by the Greek law."
  • "We have a law in Sweden saying no longer than 30 days."
  • "In France they also have a "decret" that limit keeping the files for more than 30 days."

Max / Longest Storage Duration

For most integrators, none of their projects required more than 2-3 months maximum of storage duration, as shown in the histogram below:

Four common themes emerged for applications requiring long storage duration:

  • Government regulations
  • Police / Prisons
  • Banks
  • Long term litigation concerns

Government requirements are one of the most common drivers:

  • "90 days, due a goverment contract, to record behaviour of a 3rd party team inside a goverment building"
  • "90 days. It is a federal requirement to capture the data for Federal purposes."
  • "90 days. Mandated by the government"
  • "90 days ,as govt regulations"
  • "90 days. Government mandate involving detention facility."
  • "FDA is requiring 180 days worth of video on certain lines."
  • "Six months. FDA compliance."
  • "6 months. They have been instructed to keep it that long by the Exec Director of their particular agency."
  • "Government usually requires up to 6 months of recordings for their archives"

Similarly, police and prisons have long requirements:

  • "The longest duration we have is for a police department that records video and audio in their interview and interrogation rooms. That video is recorded manually and is saved until it is manually deleted. By default in the VMS, we set the retention time to 999 days which is the maximum."
  • "7 years - A military detention center"
  • "Have one correctional facility that archives 1 year ... Reason is for potential litigation defense which has a one year statue of limitations."
  • "Two years for holding cells and prisons. It allowed them to defend against any claims of assault or wrongdoing during an inmate's stay. Two years is the statute of limitations."

Banks are the other major sector with consistent requirements for long term storage:

  • "all our financial installations are ready for 90 days"
  • "90 days. Banking regulations."
  • "180 days, banks"
  • "120 days. They are a bank and feel that 120 days should suffice for disputes"
  • "In india as per bank norms back up should be 90 days available in recorder all time."
  • "ATM transactions - regulatory requirements."
  • "6 months, corporate compliance issues. Finance."
  • "One year for banks, to comply with Central Bank requirements." (Middle East)

Finally, organizations that face significant litigation risk that might not arise for a long time after the incident frequently required long durations:

  • "in excess of 6 months. The facility is a Long Term Care provider and that was the length of time that they were able to buy with the budget they gave us for hard drives."
  • "We have one who uses 6 months storage, purely becuase cases might not be brought to thier attention for that time ... to prove what type of vapour is being emited and often this won't be brought to thier attention for a long time afterwards."
  • "Three years. Apparently, that is the statute of limitations for a personal injury claim, and their Risk Manager has decided that storing that much video is more cost effective that the potential payout that may come from not being able to substantiate the claim."
  • "One of our customers is a multinational pharmaceuticals corporation and they keep a record of 2 years .... full record of information (they store all sorts of data regarding their business for even longer time) for possible future reference since they face lots of legal pressures. "
  • "Several months. They have specific machinery that is not used very often and sometimes comes up damage or missing several months later."
  • "A slip and fall incident happens and 45-100 days pass then a cleint gets a letter from xyz law firm starting that on such and such day ... We are dealing with this exact case now as the cleint is needing to bump up their video backlog to 6 months"
  • "A Chemical Manufacture and research facility at five years of storage. They know that most plaintifs lawyers think that most companies keep three years so they wait to file lawsuits until after the video may have been deleated so this customer actually ages their video at different rates."
  • "6 months- a food manufacturing plant. Footage is kept for (in the unlikely event) of proving/disproving contamination during manufacturing process."
  • "Two years, to be able to track food products back to their manufacturing date if problems are detected during the shelf life of the product."

Impact of Megapixel on Storage Duration

Interestingly, a clear negative relationship appears between storage duration and megapixel usage. The histogram below shows that megapixel heavy projects keep surveillance video for a significantly shorter time:

A few respondents explicitly called out megapixel as a factor in reducing storage duration:

  • "With the new systems, they've discovered that the cost of storing 90 days of recording on a 16 camera IP Megapixel system is considerably higher than the 16 channel analog version, they then are willing to go down to 30 days."
  • "Most of our clients retain about 30 days of storage, except MP applications (cost) where we achieve about 10 days."

Users are valuing higher quality video over a shorter time frame to keep total storage costs stable.

Impact of Project Size on Storage Duration

Finally, integrators specializing in larger projects clearly kept video for longer time periods than small project specialists:

While this was not explicitly called out in the comments, we suspect that larger camera projects typically have higher security requirements driving the need for longer storage.

 

1 report cite this report:

Video Surveillance Storage Duration Average Is 1 Month on Jan 06, 2017
IPVM statistics show that 1 month duration for video surveillance storage is, by far, the most common used. However, in contrast to 2012, there...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Genetec Stratocast VSaaS Tested on Sep 05, 2019
The VSaaS market is rapidly expanding in 2019, with Verkada, Meraki, Eagle Eye, Avigilon and numerous startups growing their market share. When we...
Top Ways Security Integrators Improve Their Careers on Sep 03, 2019
With DIY products expanding and the future of integration debated, how do integrators stay sharp so they are not left behind? 180+ integrators...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
US Government Ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei Takes Effect Now on Aug 13, 2019
The 'prohibition on use or procurement' of Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei products and 'essential components' take effect today, August 13, 2019, one...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Aug 11, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019
Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...
How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...