Storage Duration for Surveillance 2012

Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 14, 2012

How long should video surveillance be stored? 1 week, 1 month, 1 year? This is a fundamental question for security systems. Store for too short a time and you could lose critical evidence yet record too long and it could waste a huge amount of money.

In this report, we share in-depth survey results of security integrators from around the world, examining how long and why real world deployments choose to store surveillance video.

Storage Fundamentals

This is part of our unique series on storage fundamentals, helping users make the right decision on the surveillance designs. Related reports include:

The Average

The most common storage duration, by far is 1 month; The next most common is 2 weeks. The histogram below charts the breakdown of integrator responses:

While that's the big picture, we captured many nuances in our survey results, allowing us to answer important questions such as:

  • Why do customers choose a specific storage duration?
  • How does use of megapixel impact storage duration?
  • Do larger projects average lower or higher storage duration lengths?
  • How long are the longest storage durations?
  • What drives long storage durations?
  • What markets are most likely to have extreme storage duration requirements?

Drivers of Storage Duration

Three core drivers impact storage duration:

  • How long it takes for a user to know that surveillance video is needed? Do they know within a few hours (e.g., an assault or a burglarly) or might it take weeks (e.g., reporting a fraudulent bank transaction)?
  • How long does it take to retrieve video? Even if the organization gets the alert within a day or two, they might not be able to retrieve the video for some time. As one respondent noted, "Nobody wants to race a clock inregards to keeping recorded surveillance"
  • How much it costs? With most surveillance systems, surveillance storage costs scale linearly (i.e., if the first month costs $10,000 for storage so does the second, third, fourth, etc.). However, the likelihood that video is needed keeps decreasing over time.

Most incidents are generally known within a few days or a week. Add an extra week for retrieval and that gives 2 weeks of storage. This seems to be the minimum generally accepted. With the clear majority of respondents, 1 month was preferred to provide a margin of error.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Many respondents explained that 2 weeks to a 1 month was an acceptable compromise between maximizing availability and constraining storage costs:

  • "Good balance between too short and too long of a duration"
  • "Good mix of storage requirements and typical incident retrieval time."
  • "Most of it is due to budget restrains where they can't afford the storage upfront for months of storage. A good chunk of our jobs, the client will know fairly quickly something has happened and only need a few days of record time."
  • "Tradeoff of in price (storage) vs necessity."
  • "About 2 weeks. Because is seems to be enough time to find any incident. Most reckon that if they have not need it by the they will not."

However, in the maximum storage duration section below, we examine 4 cases where 2 weeks to a month are not sufficient.

A number of European respondents explicitly cited restrictions on storage for more than 1 month:

  • "1 month which is the maximum allowed by the Greek law."
  • "We have a law in Sweden saying no longer than 30 days."
  • "In France they also have a "decret" that limit keeping the files for more than 30 days."

Max / Longest Storage Duration

For most integrators, none of their projects required more than 2-3 months maximum of storage duration, as shown in the histogram below:

Four common themes emerged for applications requiring long storage duration:

  • Government regulations
  • Police / Prisons
  • Banks
  • Long term litigation concerns

Government requirements are one of the most common drivers:

  • "90 days, due a goverment contract, to record behaviour of a 3rd party team inside a goverment building"
  • "90 days. It is a federal requirement to capture the data for Federal purposes."
  • "90 days. Mandated by the government"
  • "90 days ,as govt regulations"
  • "90 days. Government mandate involving detention facility."
  • "FDA is requiring 180 days worth of video on certain lines."
  • "Six months. FDA compliance."
  • "6 months. They have been instructed to keep it that long by the Exec Director of their particular agency."
  • "Government usually requires up to 6 months of recordings for their archives"

Similarly, police and prisons have long requirements:

  • "The longest duration we have is for a police department that records video and audio in their interview and interrogation rooms. That video is recorded manually and is saved until it is manually deleted. By default in the VMS, we set the retention time to 999 days which is the maximum."
  • "7 years - A military detention center"
  • "Have one correctional facility that archives 1 year ... Reason is for potential litigation defense which has a one year statue of limitations."
  • "Two years for holding cells and prisons. It allowed them to defend against any claims of assault or wrongdoing during an inmate's stay. Two years is the statute of limitations."

Banks are the other major sector with consistent requirements for long term storage:

  • "all our financial installations are ready for 90 days"
  • "90 days. Banking regulations."
  • "180 days, banks"
  • "120 days. They are a bank and feel that 120 days should suffice for disputes"
  • "In india as per bank norms back up should be 90 days available in recorder all time."
  • "ATM transactions - regulatory requirements."
  • "6 months, corporate compliance issues. Finance."
  • "One year for banks, to comply with Central Bank requirements." (Middle East)

Finally, organizations that face significant litigation risk that might not arise for a long time after the incident frequently required long durations:

  • "in excess of 6 months. The facility is a Long Term Care provider and that was the length of time that they were able to buy with the budget they gave us for hard drives."
  • "We have one who uses 6 months storage, purely becuase cases might not be brought to thier attention for that time ... to prove what type of vapour is being emited and often this won't be brought to thier attention for a long time afterwards."
  • "Three years. Apparently, that is the statute of limitations for a personal injury claim, and their Risk Manager has decided that storing that much video is more cost effective that the potential payout that may come from not being able to substantiate the claim."
  • "One of our customers is a multinational pharmaceuticals corporation and they keep a record of 2 years .... full record of information (they store all sorts of data regarding their business for even longer time) for possible future reference since they face lots of legal pressures. "
  • "Several months. They have specific machinery that is not used very often and sometimes comes up damage or missing several months later."
  • "A slip and fall incident happens and 45-100 days pass then a cleint gets a letter from xyz law firm starting that on such and such day ... We are dealing with this exact case now as the cleint is needing to bump up their video backlog to 6 months"
  • "A Chemical Manufacture and research facility at five years of storage. They know that most plaintifs lawyers think that most companies keep three years so they wait to file lawsuits until after the video may have been deleated so this customer actually ages their video at different rates."
  • "6 months- a food manufacturing plant. Footage is kept for (in the unlikely event) of proving/disproving contamination during manufacturing process."
  • "Two years, to be able to track food products back to their manufacturing date if problems are detected during the shelf life of the product."

Impact of Megapixel on Storage Duration

Interestingly, a clear negative relationship appears between storage duration and megapixel usage. The histogram below shows that megapixel heavy projects keep surveillance video for a significantly shorter time:

A few respondents explicitly called out megapixel as a factor in reducing storage duration:

  • "With the new systems, they've discovered that the cost of storing 90 days of recording on a 16 camera IP Megapixel system is considerably higher than the 16 channel analog version, they then are willing to go down to 30 days."
  • "Most of our clients retain about 30 days of storage, except MP applications (cost) where we achieve about 10 days."

Users are valuing higher quality video over a shorter time frame to keep total storage costs stable.

Impact of Project Size on Storage Duration

Finally, integrators specializing in larger projects clearly kept video for longer time periods than small project specialists:

While this was not explicitly called out in the comments, we suspect that larger camera projects typically have higher security requirements driving the need for longer storage.

 

1 report cite this report:

Video Surveillance Storage Duration Average Is 1 Month on Jan 06, 2017
IPVM statistics show that 1 month duration for video surveillance storage is, by far, the most common used. However, in contrast to 2012, there...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
IP Camera Cable Labeling Guide on Sep 14, 2018
Labeling cables can save a lot of money and headaches. While it is easy to overlook, taking time to label runs during installation significantly...
Favorite Intercom Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 14, 2018
Intercoms are certainly increasing in popularity, driven by the integration of video and IP networking. But who is the favorite? On the one side,...
Stanley Security Acquires 3xLogic, Kushner Becomes Product President on Sep 10, 2018
Stanley Security acquired 3xLogic a few months ago. However, the company has still not officially publicly announced it, leading many to wonder...
Dell Launches IoT for Surveillance on Sep 05, 2018
Historically, Dell has been a PC and server provider (e.g., "Dude, you're getting a Dell") and widely used for surveillance storage. However, in...
Congressional Letter Urges Sanctions Against Dahua and Hikvision For Human Rights Abuses on Sep 04, 2018
17 US Congresspeople sent a letter to the Secretary of State and Treasury urging sanctions against Chinese officials plus Dahua and Hikvision,...
Drain Wire For Access Control Reader Tutorial on Sep 04, 2018
An easy-to-miss cabling specification plays a key role in access control, yet it is commonly ignored. The drain wire offers protection for readers...
Sell Dahua or Hikvision At All, Banned From Selling to US Federal Government, Says US HASC on Aug 29, 2018
The US House Armed Services Committee (HASC) Communications Director has confirmed to IPVM that if a company sells Dahua or Hikvision at all, they...
Exit Devices For Access Control Tutorial on Aug 28, 2018
Exit Devices, also called 'Panic Bars' or 'Crash Bars' are required by safety codes the world over, and become integral parts of electronic access...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Alexa Guard Expands Amazon's Security Offerings, Boosts ADT's Stock on Sep 21, 2018
Amazon is expanding their security offerings yet again, this time with Alexa Guard that delivers security audio analytics and a virtual "Fake...
UTC, Owner of Lenel, Acquires S2 on Sep 20, 2018
UTC now owns two of the biggest access control providers, one of integrator's most hated access control platforms, Lenel, and one of their...
BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
SIA Plays Dumb On OEMs And Hikua Ban on Sep 20, 2018
OEMs widely pretend to be 'manufacturers', deceiving their customers and putting them at risk for cybersecurity attacks and, soon, violation of US...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact