Vape Detection Legal Battle: Soter Sues IPVideo Corp [Updated]

By IPVM Team, Updated Nov 21, 2020, 10:50am EST (Info+)

The crosstown vape detection rivals are now in a legal battle. While IPVideo Corp is far better known, Soter says they pioneered this space and are suing IPVideo Corp alleging unfair competition, product disparagement, trademark infringement, and cybersquatting.

IPVM Image

Inside this note, we examine the court documents, provide feedback from both companies, analyze the issues involved and their positions as the lawsuit continues.

Update November 2020: We now examine 2 court cases between the sides.

Update: ****** *******

***** ** * ****** ******* ***** by ***** ******** ****** ************ ** IP ***** ****.*** *****'* *********.

***** *** ******* *** * "****** *** ****** for *********** ****** *** ********" (**********). *** ********** *** **** ******, as ******* ** *** ********* **:

IPVM Image

*** ********** ****** *** ******* ** June **, ****.

** ***** **** ********* **** *** answer ** *** *********, ******** **** **** *** ******* to ******* ******** ***** ******, ** 2014, *.*.:

IPVM Image

********, ** ***** **** **** **** signed ** *** **** *** ** 2016, ******* **** *********** **** ****, notably ***** *****'* ****** *** ***** Peterson *** ** *** ********:

IPVM Image

* **** ** *** ** ***** Corp / *** *** *** *********.

*****'* *** ***** *********'* ******** ************ *** ** * ** ** both ******** *********** *** ******** *********** at *** **** ** **** ***:

IPVM Image

** ***** **** ** ******* ** dismiss **** ****** ****.***** ***** * ****** ** ******* 16 ******* ******* ****.

* ******* ********** ******** **, ****, **** * schedule *** *** *** **** *** months:

IPVM Image

Selling **** *********

IPVM Image***** ************ *************, * "****-**** **** *** ***** anomalies ********". ********** ******** ** ** ********** ***** ************** ** *** "************* ** ****** ****** **** *** designed ** ****** ***** ********* ** schools" *** ********* ****** ** ********* and ********* ********* ** ********. *** product's ******* ******* ** "********.***", ********* ** *** *****. *** regular ***** ** $*** *** **** to ****** *********. **** *** ****'** been "****** ** ***** *** ***** of *** ********® ****** ****** ** as *** ** $*** *** $***" to ******* **** *** **********' **** device.

******* **** ******** ******* ***** **** ********** ****, *** ***** ***** *** release ** ********. ** ** **** focused ** "***** *************" *** ********* vape *****.IPVM Image**** ******** *** ****** *******, ******* yet ********.**** ********** ****** *** **** *********** ********** **** ****** ** ****** "similar ***** ... *** **** ********* (12' ***** ** *' ********)". ** is ************* ** ****** *** ****** ** $1,195. ******* **** *** **** ********** with ****** **** **** *** ******* ** ISC ****, *** *** ******** *************** *********** *** **** ******.

Soter's ******

*****'* ********* ******* *** ********* ********** against ******* ****:

  1. ****** ***********
  2. ********* ************
  3. **************
  4. ******* *************
  5. ***** ************* ******
  6. **** ***** / ***** *******

******** ******* ************** ** **/**/** ******* *** *********** being ****:

IPVM Image

IPVM Image

Unfair ***********

*** ****** ****** ** * ***** level **** ******* **** *** **** Soter's *** "*********** **********", ****** *** brand *********** *** ***** *********** ******* "blood, ***** *** *****", *** *** thus "******" *** **********.

** ************ *** * ********* *********** ********* ** *** ** ******, *****'* CEO***** ***************:

********® *** **** * **** **** commitment **** ***** ***blood, ***** *** ***** ****, including an investment ** **** *** ******* *******. These efforts have made Soter the market leader and resulted in a significant competitive advantage for Soter. Defendants’ acts, to be described herein, are eroding the advantage conferred on Soter from Soter’s years of hard work. [emphasis added]

******** *********, ****** ** *** *********** order:

** ********* *** ********® ***** **** Soter ******* *** ******* * ****** that ****** ********®,Defendants **** **** **** ** ************ **** *** ******** ** *** *** ******* ****** ********** ***** ***** *** **** ********® and vape detection. [emphasis added]

Cybersquatting / ********* ************

***** ****** *** **********, ******* ****, used *** ****** *******.********.****** *** ****** ** **** *** 2020 ** * ******* **** "** advertise *** ***** *** **** ***** own **** *** ******** ********* ****** device".

**** *** *** "**********’ *** ** the ********** ****** **** ****** *** Period ** ********* ** ********* ***** competing **** ****** *** ** *** times ** *** ***** *** **** the ****** ** **** ******** **** would ********* **** **** ******* ** Soter".

*** ********* ****** **** "**** *** visited *** ********** ****** ****, **** were *********** ********** ** **********’ ******* as ***** *****."

IPVM Image

** * ********* ********** ** ** effect,***.********.********** ** **** ******* **** ** of **/**/**:

IPVM Image

******* ****'* ********* ***** ***** ********* to **** ************ *****, ******* ****:

***** ** ******** *** ******,********.***(*** .***) ****** **** **** ******* for ***** *********, ** ****’* *** any ***** *** *********. ***** ** is *** ********* **** ****** ** be ** *** *****, ** *** no ******* **** ****** **** *** redirect.

*********** ********* (************ **. *,***,***)***** ***** *****, ************:

  • ****** ****, ** **** ***** *******, *** "October *, ****"
  • ************ ****, ** **** *** ***** ******* the ***********, *** "*** **, ****"

**********, *** ********* ******* *** *** of *** ********* ******* ***** ** September *, ****.

Product ************* / ***** ******

** *** *********** ***** ******* ****** "Defendants' ***** **********" ***** ********* *** allegation:

IPVM Image

***** *** ******* ** ** ******** from **** ***** ***** ******* ** IPVideo **** ************** ********** ******** ** a ****** ********:

IPVM Image

******* **** ********* ***** ***** *********, saying:

**** ***** ** **** ** **. If ********, **** ****** *** ********** as ** **** **** **** ** our ***** *******.

Falsely ***** ************* ** *******

***** **** ********** **** ******* **** misrepresents * ************* ** ******** ******** with **** *******, "**** ** ** not":

IPVM Image

***** ***** * ******** ******* ***** they **** * ****** **** ** IPVideo **** *** "**** $**,***":

IPVM Image

***"******* *" ******** ********** **** ** **** ********* **** ultimately **** ** ******* ****:

IPVM Image

*** ** *** *** ************ ** the **** *** ************* **** ******** software, ** *****:

IPVM Image

*****'* ***** ** **** ******* **** falsely ******* ************* ****** ****** *******, saying ** *** ******* **** *** deal:

******* **** *** ********** ********* *** devices **** *****. **** *** ******** wanted ** ******** *** ********** *******, it *** ******** ** ** ******* a ****** ******* *******.One ** *** *** ************ *** ************* **** ********®. ** ***** *********** ********* * *** ******* ******** **** **** *** ******* ** ********’* *******, ******** *** ***** *** *** *** ****. [emphasis added]

******* ****'* ***** ***** ********** *** "SPECIFICATIONS" ****** ******** ** *** *** that ****:

******** ** *** **** ** *** solicitation, ******** *********, ** *******, ** material, **defined ** ********** * *********** *******, or by using the name of the manufacture or vendor, the term "or ******** ******** *****", if not inserted, will be implied. [emphasis added]

***** **** ********* ****** ** *** a ****** *** **** *** *** "or *****" ****** ***** **** **** do *** ***** ************* **** ******** by ********** * ***:

******* ****** ******** *** * ****** bid **** *** ********* ** ** two ** *** ******* *** *****. One ** *** ******* *** ******* the *** ***** ** **** ***** $6770 ***** **** ***** ********* ** the ******* ****** ********’* ********** ****. It ** *** ******* ** **** the ********* **** *** ***** ********** public **** ***** *** ******** ** include ** “** *****” ****** *** in **** **** ** *** ********:

** ***** *****, ** ******* **** defined *** ***** ** ********** * proprietary *******, ****** *** ***** *******, the ******** ** ** ** **** as "***** ** ******** ******** *****."

** ********* ******* **** **** **** is ** "**** ********" *** **** "have ***** **** * ********* **** our ****** ** ********** **** ***** proprietary ********":

***** ********* **** * **************/****** ******* that *** **** *** ***** ****** was ********** **** ***** ********. ******** Halowill *** ** *** **** ******* ** *** ***** ** ********, we have never **** * ********* that our system is compatible with their proprietary software. Halo was designed as open ******** and integrates with over 40 different manufacturers. [emphasis added]

** ***** *****, *****'* ***** ** FlySense ************* *** ********, ******* ******* Corp ******* **** ****** **** ** "equal" ** ******* ******** ****** ** be **********.

*** ****** ******** *** *** ********* to ********* ** ***** ******* ** uses, *** ******* ************* ** ** issue.

Falsely ******* ************

***** **** **** **** "********** ** David *****" ***** ******** ********* ******** to ** * ******** ** *****'* devices:

IPVM Image

*** ***, *******, **** *** **** to *** ****** ******* **** ** any ********:

IPVM Image

***** ******* **** ***** ******* **** IPVideo ****, *****'* ******** ** ******** their ****** ****, *** ***** *****, and ****, **** **** **** ** show **** * ************ ****** **** IPVideo **** *** *** ****** ******:

**********’ ******** ******* ** ******** *** Infringing ****** **** ** ** ** Video *********** ******* ******* *** **** Device *** ******** *** ****** ** create *false ********** *** ******* *********, *** ****** *** *** ***** **** ********* **** ***** *** * **********, ***********, ***********, ** *********** ******* *********’* ********® *** **********’ **** ******—***** ***** *** ***. [emphasis added]

$1 ******* ** ***** *******

***** ****** "********* *** **** ******** losses ** ***** *** ******* ******* in ***** *******" *** ********:

********* *** **** ******** ****** ** aboutone ******* ******* ** ***** *******. To compete with Defendants’ HALO Device, Soter has been forced to lower the price of its FlySense® sensor device to as low as $650 and $600, and either significantly reduce or waive entirely charges for year 2 and following support of $150 per purchased sensor device.

$2 ******* ** ***** ****

***** **** ******* **** "**** ****", and "**** ******** ** ****, *********** profits *** ****" ** *****'* *********. They ******** **** $* ******* ** sales ****, ********** *****:

  • *** "***** **********" (********* *****) "*** Plaintiff **lose ** ***** *** **** in 2019."
  • "*******, *** ** **********’ ********* ************, cybersquatting, ****** *********** *** ***** ****, Soter *** ******** **** ****two ******* ******* ** **** *****."
  • "*** *******, ********* ** **** ***** the **** ****** *** **** ********* in **** **** ******* *** ** currently ****** ** $*,***. ***** **** HALO ** ****** ****** ** **** the ***** *** **** ********* ** a ******, * ************ ******** ** sales **** ***** ***lost ** **** ** $*.** *******."
  • "********* *** **** ********loss ** ***** ** ********* *********** ******** purchasers buy when they purchase FlySense® such as published books, hashtag no vaping packages, white papers, posters, and bracelets."

Soter ***** *******

***** ********* *** ******* ** * press *******:

IPVM Image

******** ************:

** ********* *** ******* *******, ** are ********* ** ********* *** ************ property, *******, ********** *** *** **********.

** *** **** ** *** ********* internal **** *** *** ******* *** rely ** ** ** ******* **** and **** **** ***** ** ****.

**** *** ******* ****** * ****** public ****** *** ******* ** **** the ****** **** ******* **** ** a ******* ********** ** *** *******:

*** ******* ***** ******* *** * permanent ********** ** ******* ** *****, A+ *** *** **** ******false ********** ***** ********®, ** ******** ** **************, ************ ** *****’* ********® *********, ** ****** *********** ******* ***** [emphasis added]

IPVideo ****'* ********

************** *****'* ******** ** **** **** **** the ******* ** "*********" *** ***** on * "*****************" ** * **************/****** claiming **** *************:

******* ******** *** ******* ********* ** Soter ************ ** ********* *** ******* to ** ***** ** ** ***** one ***************** ** *** ***** **** our ***** **** ** ******** ********. The ********* *********** ***** (***) **** the ******* ****** ** *** ***** was ******** ** *** ***** ******* to *** ** * ****** **** was ********* ** ******* ***** ** Soter ****** *** ********* *********** *** Soter ********* **** * **************/****** ******* that *** **** *** ***** ****** was ********** **** ***** ********.

** ***** *****:

*** ** ***** ***** *******, *****’* claims *** ********.

Poll / ****

Comments (28)

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

07/22/20 06:01pm

****** *** *** ******** ********* ** this ****. **** ** *********** ** see ***** ** ****.

**'** *** * ****** ** ******* inquire ** ** **** ***********, **** yet *** ********.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 3
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Joey Walter

IPVM | IPVMU Certified | In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #1 | 07/22/20 06:35pm

*********** #*,

****** *** *** *******.

**** **** ********* ***** **** ******** and ************.

** *** ***** *** ****** ** dealers ********* *** ** ** **** this, ** ******* ******** ** *** market **** ********?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

In reply to Joey Walter | 07/22/20 07:07pm

* ***** *** *** ****** ***** and **** *********** ***********.

* ****'* ***** ** ******** ***** this ****, *** * ***** ****** search ** "**** ********* *** *******" shows * *********** ********* ** *** for ******* ****. ***** **** ****** a *** ****** *** *** *** a *** ** ****, ******** *** ConnectOne *********** ********, ** **** ****** somewhat **** ******** *****.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #2

07/22/20 06:38pm

* *** *** ******** ******* ********** at *** **** ****** *** **** product *** **** ******** ** ** the ******. ** ** **** ******* me ******** ***** * ******** ** such *** ******* ***** ** ** a *** ** *-** ****. **** speaking **** ********* *** *** ***** feedback ** ** ****'* ** ** far ******* ** *** ***** ** area ******** * ******* ****** ******** requires *** **** ***** ****** ** an ********* ********.

***** ******* **** ***** ** *** security ******** ** * ************ **** brought ** ****** * ******** **** were ******* ** ********* **** *** start. ** ** ******* **** *** of *** ******* *** ***** ** a ******* ***** ***** *** ******** products *********** **. ** ******** *** link ******* ** ***** **** *** A+ ********** & ******** ************* **** IP ***** **** ******* ********** ********** in *** ******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 3
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Joey Walter

IPVM | IPVMU Certified | In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #2 | 07/22/20 07:02pm

**** ** ***********, ******!

***** ****** ***** ********** ***** *** "safety *** ********" ** ******* *** there ** ** ******** ***** **** investment *** **** ********.

******* **** ** **** ****** ***** and *** * ******** ** *** security ******** ** *** *********.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #3

07/22/20 07:30pm

*** **** *** **** *** **** lawsuit.... *** ******* **** ****** *** flysense.com ****** (*** *********** ** ***** own ****) ** * ******** ** douche **** - *** ***** ****** their ******* ** ****** *** *******.

#*****

Agree: 15
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

Undisclosed #4

07/22/20 07:33pm

** * ********** *** ******* * item *********, ***** *** * ****** sales ***** *** ***** ** * higher ***** **** **** * ******** integrator ***** ******** **** *** ******* unit ***?

*** ******** **** *** *** ***** unit ** ********* *****, *** *** year * *** * ******* *** makes ** **** ********* *******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #5

07/22/20 08:26pm

**** *** **** .. *** ****** is **** ***********

* ******* *** ** ***** **** in *** **** *** * ******* link ** ***** ******* *** **** left * ********* **** **** ******* like ** ********* ******* (*** ****). Eventually, * ***** **** **** **** in **** ****, ******** *** ** interest *** **** ******* ***** **** comparisons ******* ******** *** ****. **** products **** ****** ******* ********, *** the **** ********** ** *** **** was **** ******** *** * ****** model, *** ** ****, *** * more ****** *** ************ **** *********; wheras **** *** ***** ********* *** had ** *** **** ******** *** its ******** *******. *******, **** *** not ******* * ******* ** ****** service ***.

* *** ** **** ** ** has ******* ******* ** **** **** is ****** *** **** ** "*********" or ********** ***** *** **** ****** the *** **** ** ****** *** monitor **** **** ***** *** * also ***** **** *** ****** *** with ** ******** ****** **** ** well. **** **** **** **** ********** now ***** *** *** ********* **** was ********* *******.

** ***** **** ** *** **** I ******* *** ** ***** ** mid **** **** ***** ****** *** still ********** ********** *** ******** *** the ******** * *** ****** ** see **** *** ***** **** ****** seemed ** ******** **** ***** ** the ***** ***** ******** ***** **** showing **** ** ***** ****** *** the **** *** ***** *** ** to ***** *************. **** ***** ** because ***** *****'* ** **** **** units *** ***** ** **** ******** about, *** ** *** **** **** Soter ****'* *** ***** *** ***** time.

*'* **** * ******* *** ********** of *** ********* *** ************ ** each *******'* ******* ***** **** * lot ********* **** *** *** * saw **** ***** * ****** ***. Each ******* *** ***** * ********* market ******** *** ****, *** **** is **** **** ******** ** *** security *** **** ********** ****** **** Soter, ***** ***** ******* ** ** marketing ** **** ******** ***** ******* within *** ******/********* ******.

**** ***** ***** ****** ** ***********, and ** *****, *** ******* **** make * *** ** ***** ***** this ***** ** *******.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative: 3
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #6

07/22/20 10:36pm

*** ***** **** ********* ******* ********** popular ** *******? * **** *** participated ** ****** **** ** ****** a ******. ******* ** ******* **** detection ** ***** ***** ***** ** any *******. ******* ********* ** * surprisingly ****** ******* *** ***** **** detection.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Brandon Knutson

IPVMU Certified | In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #6 | 07/22/20 11:03pm

****** *** ** ******** ** ****** restrooms ***** ** *** ******** ******* schools. * **** ** **** ** schools *** ********** *****, *** **** are ********** *** ** ***** ****.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Brandon Knutson | 07/22/20 11:08pm

*******, ******! ******* - **** *** you ******* ** *** ****** **** about ***** *********** *********?

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Brandon Knutson

IPVMU Certified | In reply to John Honovich | 07/22/20 11:21pm

* *****'* ***** ******** ** **** screening, *** **** ********* ********* **** bigger ********* ** **** *** **** fall. *** *********** *********, ** ******** is ****, * *** ** **** be ******** ************ ******** ** ****** room **********.

Agree: 2
Disagree: 1
Informative: 2
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #7

07/27/20 02:06pm

** ** ********** ********.***, *** ****'* pick ** *** ~$*/**** **** *** .com/.edu/.org *** ******* ** *** *******? I'm *** ****** **** ** ***** Corp *** *** **, ***** ***** to ** * *** ** ********* on *** **** ** * ********* on ************. *** *********, *** ******'* you ******** *** ***** ******** ** your *******?

Agree: 3
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Eliezer Martinez

08/17/20 07:54pm

*** ******* * **** ** **** for *** * *** *** **** Detection ** * ****** ******** ***** Soter's ******** ******* ** *** ******* offered. * ***** ***** ** **** until ********* ****** ** ***** ******* Halo ** ***** *****. ** ****** like * ****** ******* ** ** opinion. ***** ****'* **** ** **** their ***** ******** **** * ********* standpoint *** **** ****'* ****** ********** the ******** *** *** **** ** Video ***. ** ***** ******** ** integrator ******** ***** ***** ****'*. **** allows *** *********** **** ******* ***** Soter *****'* ** ** *********. ** just ***** **** ** ***** *** better ************* ** *** ******** *** knows *** ******* *** ******* ** K-12's ******. ***** **** ***** *** as ***** ***** **.

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Joseph Marotta

IPVMU Certified | 11/18/20 04:06pm

************* **% ** *** ********** ******** I ****** *** *** *-** *** higher ********* *******. **** *** *** first **** * ****** ***** ** to ******* **** ******* ** * new ****** ****** *******. ****** ******, other ****** ********* **** ********** **** sensors ** ***** ******** ****. * searched *** *** ******** ******** *** Halo ***. ***** **** ****** **** very *******, *** *** ********* ************ of *** **** ******* ****** **** more *************, *** **** ****'* **** annual *********** ****. ******** *** ****** reoccurring **** ** $*** *** ******. Now **** ****** ********* *** ** what * *********, * **** **** a ****/*******/**** ********** ** ******** *** Halo ** *** ****** ******** *** decide *** **********.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 11/21/20 01:20pm

******: ***** ** * ****** ******* filed ** ***** ******** ****** ************ by ** ***** ****.*** *****'* *********.

***** *** ******* *** * "****** *** ****** for *********** ****** *** ********" (**********). *** ********** *** **** ******, as ******* ** *** ********* **:

IPVM Image

******************* *** ******* ** **** **, 2020.

** ***** **** ********* **** *** answer ** *** *********, ******** **** **** *** ******* to ******* ******** ***** ******, ** 2014, *.*.:

IPVM Image

********, ** ***** **** **** **** signed ** *** **** *** ** 2016, ******* **** *********** **** ****, notably ***** *****'* ****** *** ***** Peterson *** ** *** ********:

IPVM Image

* **** ** *** ** ***** Corp / *** *** *** *********.

*****'* *** ***** *********'* ******** ************ *** ** * ** ** both ******** *********** *** ******** *********** at *** **** ** **** ***:

IPVM Image

** ***** **** ** ******* ** dismiss **** ****** ****.***** ***** * ****** ** ******* 16 ******* ******* ****.

* ******* ********** ******** **, ****, **** * schedule *** *** *** **** *** months:

IPVM Image

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 03/01/21 12:11pm

******: **** ***** ******* *** ******* ******* ********** *****'* *********:

**********’ ****** ** ******* *** ********* is ******* ** ****. *** ****** brought ** ********** **** **********’ ******* misrepresentation **** *** **** ****** ** “compatible ****” *** ******** ******** *** DISMISSED **** *********. ***** *** *** product ************* ** ********* ******* *********. The ********* ****** ******* ********** *+ Technology *** ******* *** ********* ******* prejudice. *** ***** ** ***** ** respectfully ******** ** ********* ***** *******. Plaintiff ** ******* ***** ** **** a ****** ******* ********* ****** ** days ** *** **** ** **** Opinion *** *****.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to John Honovich | 03/30/21 11:09am

***** *** *** ***** * ****** amended *********

********************************************* - ****** ******* ***********************-**-***********.*

* *** *** ***** **** ** new ** ******** ** *** *********.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to John Honovich | 04/09/21 11:22am

***** ** *** ******* ***** ** file * ********** *********, ****** **** ***:

** *** ********** *********** ** ******* of *** ********* ************ *** ****** competition ****** ***** **** **** ********** after **** ******** ** **********’ ****** to *******.

*** ******** ** **** ** ***** Corp **** *****'* ********* ***** (**** Soter) ** ******** ** *********:

IPVM Image

******* *** *** ******** ***** ******* *********.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to John Honovich | 04/26/21 11:20am

***,** ***** **** *** *********** *** *** ******* *********. *** two **** ******, **** * ***** scan ** *** ****, ** **** IP ***** ****'* ********* ****** *** domain ********.*** *** **** **** *** marketing ********* *** *****'* ********:

********** ***** **** ******* ********* ** keywords **** ******** *** ***** “***” and “*****” *** ** ******** **** included *** **** “*****,” ** **** as *** ***** ********, ********** ** descriptive ***** ** ********** ***** ** IPVideo, ** **** ** * ******* marketing **** *** ******** ** *******’* outside ********** *** *******, ***

*******, ** ***** **** **** **** they **** *** * *** ******* sessions **** ****** * **** *** only * ******* ********:

********** ***** **** ****** ********* **** September *, **** ** **** **, 2020 *** *** ****** ******** **** the ****** *** **** *** ***** and *** ******** *** *******, **** two ***********/******** ** ***** *** ***** submitted * ******* ******* **** ** IPVideo

*** **** ****** ****:

******* ** ***** ******** *** ** any ***** ** *** **** ******.

***, **** ****** **** ***** ******* "did *** ***** ******** *********" *** that "********* *** *** ******** *** compensable ******* ******* ** *** ******* by *** *********. ** ***** **** made ** ******* ** * ****** of *** ********* ** *** ****** name ** *** ******* *******."

***** ********* *** **** ** ******** more ** ***** **** **** *** possible ********** ** ********.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 09/02/21 11:57am

*** ****** **** ************* ***** ****** ** ****** ** Video **** ** ****** ********** ** Halo ****** ****:

** ********* ********* ***** ************, *** and *****-***** ********* ***** ******** ** this ******, *** ***** ******** ** Your *****’* ********** ******** ***.*.* ** move ** ****** ********** ** ****** inspection ** ****** **** *** ********* they ******, ** *** **, ****, to ******. ******** ** ********** ******** III.A.1 *** ***** ***** **.* & 37.3, * ******* **** ******* *** Plaintiff *** ********** *** *** ********* by ********* ** ****** ** *** were ****** ** ******* **** *******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to John Honovich | 09/08/21 12:10pm

********* *+ ****************:

*********’* ********* ****** ** ******** ** the ******* ********* ** **** ***** to ***** ********* ** ***** ************ and ********** ** *** **** ** motions.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to John Honovich | 09/15/21 11:57am

***** *** ***** **** *+ / IP ***** ****, *** ***, ** this ******:

*** ***** ***** **** ** ** appropriate *** *** ******* ** ***** complete *** ******* ******* ****** ***** Brown. ********* ** *** ******* ** that *******, ********* *** ****** ** this ***** **** ***** ***** *** made *** ******* ********.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 10/13/21 12:12pm

*** ******* ** ********** *********** ********* (*** **** *** *****):

*****'* * ****** ******* *** ******* about *** ******* ** "*********" ************ as ** ******* ** ******, ** the ***** *********:

***** **** *** *********** ** **** as *** ********* ** *******, ** became ***** **** **** *** ******* proves ********: *** ******* ** “*********** matching ********* ** ******” ***, **** specifically “*********” ** **** ** *** independent ******

*** ***** ******* ** ***** ****'* proposed ************:

*** ***** ****** *** **********’ [** Video ****] ******** ************ ** “**********” to ***: “********** ****** ** *** properties ***/** ******** ** *** **** include ***********, ********, *** ******** ****** that ***** ******** ******** *** ******** of ******.”

***,***** ***** ** ****** ** ****** inspection** ** ***** ****'* ****** **** and**** * ****** ** *** ***** intending** **** ** ******* *********'* ******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 12/15/21 12:12pm

**** ********** *********, ****** -

***********************************************************-**-***********.*

********* ***** ************ ***** * ****** to ********** **** *****’* ***** ************ Order, ***** ********* ********* ******* ***** errors. ** ***. *** *** ******* stated *****, *** *********’* ****** *** reconsideration ** ******.

*** ***** ******** ** ******* ******* “ranges” ** “************” *** ************* *** construction ** “*********.” ** ** ** to *** **** ** ****** ******* the *** ** * “*****” ** “measurements” ***** ***** *** ***** ** the *****.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 01/17/22 01:00pm

**** **** *********, ** ***** *******:

**********’ (“***”) ****** ** ***** *** First ******* *************(***. **) *******: (*) IPV ****** ******* ** ******* *********; (ii) *** ******** ********** *** ****** and ***** ********* ***** *** ********; and (***) *** ****** ** ****** with **** *****’* ***** ********* * good ***** ****** ** ******* ******** before ****** * ****** *** ****** Circuit *** ********* ******* ******* ********* to ****** ******** ******* ********* ** their *******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Adam Huss

Kuns Northcoast Security
In reply to John Honovich | 01/17/22 02:31pm

**** * ****** **** * ***** glance ** **** ** *** *****'* third ******* ** ****, *** *** has ****** ****, ** *** *********, most ** *** *********/*?

*'* ********** ** **** ** **** sensors *** ******** ****** ***** * hot **** ***** ***. **'** ********* them ** ***** ** **** *******, with ** ****** ****** ******** (***** seven *******, ***** **** ***** **** from **) ** *** ****** *** adding ****.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 01/24/22 12:37pm

*** ****** **** *** **** ******. On *** ****, ****** *****:

***** ***************** *** *** ****** **********.Plaintiff's ****** ** ******* *** ******, **** *********, ***** **** **(*)(*) ** ****** **** *** *******. The application for attorneys' fees and costs is DENIED. Defendants are to advise the Court in writing by******* **, ****** ** ******* **** **** ** undertake *** *********** **** *** **** of ********** **** ***** *************, ******** that **** ************* ****** ******* ******. Absent **** *******, *** **** ***** be ******. ******* ** ***** **** R. ***** ***/**/****. [******** *****]

*** **** ** *** ****:

***** ** ****** *** *** ****** Conference *** **/** **:** ** ***** re110 . **********' ************* *** *****-***** claims *** ****** ********* ******* *********. The ***** ** ***** ** ************ directed ** ***** *** ****. ******* by ***** **** *. ***** ** 1/21/2022

** ** *** ***** ** ** why *** **** ***** *** *** we *** *** **** *** ******** explanation ** *** ***** *******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts reporting, tutorials and software funded by subscriber's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Loading Related Reports