Vape Detection Legal Battle: Soter Sues IPVideo Corp [Updated]

IT
IPVM Team
•Last Updated Nov 21, 2020 15:50 PM

The crosstown vape detection rivals are now in a legal battle. While IPVideo Corp is far better known, Soter says they pioneered this space and are suing IPVideo Corp alleging unfair competition, product disparagement, trademark infringement, and cybersquatting.

IPVM Image

Inside this note, we examine the court documents, provide feedback from both companies, analyze the issues involved and their positions as the lawsuit continues.

Update November 2020: We now examine 2 court cases between the sides.

Update: ****** *******

***** ** * ****** ******* ***** by ***** ******** ****** ************ ** IP ***** ****.*** *****'* *********.

***** *** ******* *** * "****** *** ****** for *********** ****** *** ********" (**********). *** ********** *** **** ******, as ******* ** *** ********* **:

IPVM Image

*** ********** ****** *** ******* ** June **, ****.

** ***** **** ********* **** *** answer ** *** *********, ******** **** **** *** ******* to ******* ******** ***** ******, ** 2014, *.*.:

IPVM Image

********, ** ***** **** **** **** signed ** *** **** *** ** 2016, ******* **** *********** **** ****, notably ***** *****'* ****** *** ***** Peterson *** ** *** ********:

IPVM Image

* **** ** *** ** ***** Corp / *** *** *** *********.

*****'* *** ***** *********'* ******** ************ *** ** * ** ** both ******** *********** *** ******** *********** at *** **** ** **** ***:

IPVM Image

** ***** **** ** ******* ** dismiss **** ****** ****.***** ***** * ****** ** ******* 16 ******* ******* ****.

* ******* ********** ******** **, ****, **** * schedule *** *** *** **** *** months:

IPVM Image

Selling **** *********

IPVM Image***** ************ *************, * "****-**** **** *** ***** anomalies ********". ********** ******** ** ** ********** ***** ************** ** *** "************* ** ****** ****** **** *** designed ** ****** ***** ********* ** schools" *** ********* ****** ** ********* and ********* ********* ** ********. *** product's ******* ******* ** "********.***", ********* ** *** *****. *** regular ***** ** $*** *** **** to ****** *********. **** *** ****'** been "****** ** ***** *** ***** of *** ********® ****** ****** ** as *** ** $*** *** $***" to ******* **** *** **********' **** device.

******* **** ******** ******* ***** **** ********** ****, *** ***** ***** *** release ** ********. ** ** **** focused ** "***** *************" *** ********* vape *****.IPVM Image**** ******** *** ****** *******, ******* yet ********.**** ********** ****** *** **** *********** ********** **** ****** ** ****** "similar ***** ... *** **** ********* (12' ***** ** *' ********)". ** is ************* ** ****** *** ****** ** $1,195. ******* **** *** **** ********** with ****** **** **** *** ******* ** ISC ****, *** *** ******** *************** *********** *** **** ******.

Soter's ******

*****'* ********* ******* *** ********* ********** against ******* ****:

  1. ****** ***********
  2. ********* ************
  3. **************
  4. ******* *************
  5. ***** ************* ******
  6. **** ***** / ***** *******

******** ******* ************** ** **/**/** ******* *** *********** being ****:

IPVM Image

IPVM Image

Unfair ***********

*** ****** ****** ** * ***** level **** ******* **** *** **** Soter's *** "*********** **********", ****** *** brand *********** *** ***** *********** ******* "blood, ***** *** *****", *** *** thus "******" *** **********.

** ************ *** * ********* *********** ********* ** *** ** ******, *****'* CEO***** ***************:

********® *** **** * **** **** commitment **** ***** ***blood, ***** *** ***** ****, including an investment ** **** *** ******* *******. These efforts have made Soter the market leader and resulted in a significant competitive advantage for Soter. Defendants’ acts, to be described herein, are eroding the advantage conferred on Soter from Soter’s years of hard work. [emphasis added]

******** *********, ****** ** *** *********** order:

** ********* *** ********® ***** **** Soter ******* *** ******* * ****** that ****** ********®,Defendants **** **** **** ** ************ **** *** ******** ** *** *** ******* ****** ********** ***** ***** *** **** ********® and vape detection. [emphasis added]

Cybersquatting / ********* ************

***** ****** *** **********, ******* ****, used *** ****** *******.********.****** *** ****** ** **** *** 2020 ** * ******* **** "** advertise *** ***** *** **** ***** own **** *** ******** ********* ****** device".

**** *** *** "**********’ *** ** the ********** ****** **** ****** *** Period ** ********* ** ********* ***** competing **** ****** *** ** *** times ** *** ***** *** **** the ****** ** **** ******** **** would ********* **** **** ******* ** Soter".

*** ********* ****** **** "**** *** visited *** ********** ****** ****, **** were *********** ********** ** **********’ ******* as ***** *****."

IPVM Image

** * ********* ********** ** ** effect,***.********.********** ** **** ******* **** ** of **/**/**:

IPVM Image

******* ****'* ********* ***** ***** ********* to **** ************ *****, ******* ****:

***** ** ******** *** ******,********.***(*** .***) ****** **** **** ******* for ***** *********, ** ****’* *** any ***** *** *********. ***** ** is *** ********* **** ****** ** be ** *** *****, ** *** no ******* **** ****** **** *** redirect.

*********** ********* (************ **. *,***,***)***** ***** *****, ************:

  • ****** ****, ** **** ***** *******, *** "October *, ****"
  • ************ ****, ** **** *** ***** ******* the ***********, *** "*** **, ****"

**********, *** ********* ******* *** *** of *** ********* ******* ***** ** September *, ****.

Product ************* / ***** ******

** *** *********** ***** ******* ****** "Defendants' ***** **********" ***** ********* *** allegation:

IPVM Image

***** *** ******* ** ** ******** from **** ***** ***** ******* ** IPVideo **** ************** ********** ******** ** a ****** ********:

IPVM Image

******* **** ********* ***** ***** *********, saying:

**** ***** ** **** ** **. If ********, **** ****** *** ********** as ** **** **** **** ** our ***** *******.

Falsely ***** ************* ** *******

***** **** ********** **** ******* **** misrepresents * ************* ** ******** ******** with **** *******, "**** ** ** not":

IPVM Image

***** ***** * ******** ******* ***** they **** * ****** **** ** IPVideo **** *** "**** $**,***":

IPVM Image

***"******* *" ******** ********** **** ** **** ********* **** ultimately **** ** ******* ****:

IPVM Image

*** ** *** *** ************ ** the **** *** ************* **** ******** software, ** *****:

IPVM Image

*****'* ***** ** **** ******* **** falsely ******* ************* ****** ****** *******, saying ** *** ******* **** *** deal:

******* **** *** ********** ********* *** devices **** *****. **** *** ******** wanted ** ******** *** ********** *******, it *** ******** ** ** ******* a ****** ******* *******.One ** *** *** ************ *** ************* **** ********®. ** ***** *********** ********* * *** ******* ******** **** **** *** ******* ** ********’* *******, ******** *** ***** *** *** *** ****. [emphasis added]

******* ****'* ***** ***** ********** *** "SPECIFICATIONS" ****** ******** ** *** *** that ****:

******** ** *** **** ** *** solicitation, ******** *********, ** *******, ** material, **defined ** ********** * *********** *******, or by using the name of the manufacture or vendor, the term "or ******** ******** *****", if not inserted, will be implied. [emphasis added]

***** **** ********* ****** ** *** a ****** *** **** *** *** "or *****" ****** ***** **** **** do *** ***** ************* **** ******** by ********** * ***:

******* ****** ******** *** * ****** bid **** *** ********* ** ** two ** *** ******* *** *****. One ** *** ******* *** ******* the *** ***** ** **** ***** $6770 ***** **** ***** ********* ** the ******* ****** ********’* ********** ****. It ** *** ******* ** **** the ********* **** *** ***** ********** public **** ***** *** ******** ** include ** “** *****” ****** *** in **** **** ** *** ********:

** ***** *****, ** ******* **** defined *** ***** ** ********** * proprietary *******, ****** *** ***** *******, the ******** ** ** ** **** as "***** ** ******** ******** *****."

** ********* ******* **** **** **** is ** "**** ********" *** **** "have ***** **** * ********* **** our ****** ** ********** **** ***** proprietary ********":

***** ********* **** * **************/****** ******* that *** **** *** ***** ****** was ********** **** ***** ********. ******** Halowill *** ** *** **** ******* ** *** ***** ** ********, we have never **** * ********* that our system is compatible with their proprietary software. Halo was designed as open ******** and integrates with over 40 different manufacturers. [emphasis added]

** ***** *****, *****'* ***** ** FlySense ************* *** ********, ******* ******* Corp ******* **** ****** **** ** "equal" ** ******* ******** ****** ** be **********.

*** ****** ******** *** *** ********* to ********* ** ***** ******* ** uses, *** ******* ************* ** ** issue.

Falsely ******* ************

***** **** **** **** "********** ** David *****" ***** ******** ********* ******** to ** * ******** ** *****'* devices:

IPVM Image

*** ***, *******, **** *** **** to *** ****** ******* **** ** any ********:

IPVM Image

***** ******* **** ***** ******* **** IPVideo ****, *****'* ******** ** ******** their ****** ****, *** ***** *****, and ****, **** **** **** ** show **** * ************ ****** **** IPVideo **** *** *** ****** ******:

**********’ ******** ******* ** ******** *** Infringing ****** **** ** ** ** Video *********** ******* ******* *** **** Device *** ******** *** ****** ** create *false ********** *** ******* *********, *** ****** *** *** ***** **** ********* **** ***** *** * **********, ***********, ***********, ** *********** ******* *********’* ********® *** **********’ **** ******—***** ***** *** ***. [emphasis added]

$1 ******* ** ***** *******

***** ****** "********* *** **** ******** losses ** ***** *** ******* ******* in ***** *******" *** ********:

********* *** **** ******** ****** ** aboutone ******* ******* ** ***** *******. To compete with Defendants’ HALO Device, Soter has been forced to lower the price of its FlySense® sensor device to as low as $650 and $600, and either significantly reduce or waive entirely charges for year 2 and following support of $150 per purchased sensor device.

$2 ******* ** ***** ****

***** **** ******* **** "**** ****", and "**** ******** ** ****, *********** profits *** ****" ** *****'* *********. They ******** **** $* ******* ** sales ****, ********** *****:

  • *** "***** **********" (********* *****) "*** Plaintiff **lose ** ***** *** **** in 2019."
  • "*******, *** ** **********’ ********* ************, cybersquatting, ****** *********** *** ***** ****, Soter *** ******** **** ****two ******* ******* ** **** *****."
  • "*** *******, ********* ** **** ***** the **** ****** *** **** ********* in **** **** ******* *** ** currently ****** ** $*,***. ***** **** HALO ** ****** ****** ** **** the ***** *** **** ********* ** a ******, * ************ ******** ** sales **** ***** ***lost ** **** ** $*.** *******."
  • "********* *** **** ********loss ** ***** ** ********* *********** ******** purchasers buy when they purchase FlySense® such as published books, hashtag no vaping packages, white papers, posters, and bracelets."

Soter ***** *******

***** ********* *** ******* ** * press *******:

IPVM Image

******** ************:

** ********* *** ******* *******, ** are ********* ** ********* *** ************ property, *******, ********** *** *** **********.

** *** **** ** *** ********* internal **** *** *** ******* *** rely ** ** ** ******* **** and **** **** ***** ** ****.

**** *** ******* ****** * ****** public ****** *** ******* ** **** the ****** **** ******* **** ** a ******* ********** ** *** *******:

*** ******* ***** ******* *** * permanent ********** ** ******* ** *****, A+ *** *** **** ******false ********** ***** ********®, ** ******** ** **************, ************ ** *****’* ********® *********, ** ****** *********** ******* ***** [emphasis added]

IPVideo ****'* ********

************** *****'* ******** ** **** **** **** the ******* ** "*********" *** ***** on * "*****************" ** * **************/****** claiming **** *************:

******* ******** *** ******* ********* ** Soter ************ ** ********* *** ******* to ** ***** ** ** ***** one ***************** ** *** ***** **** our ***** **** ** ******** ********. The ********* *********** ***** (***) **** the ******* ****** ** *** ***** was ******** ** *** ***** ******* to *** ** * ****** **** was ********* ** ******* ***** ** Soter ****** *** ********* *********** *** Soter ********* **** * **************/****** ******* that *** **** *** ***** ****** was ********** **** ***** ********.

** ***** *****:

*** ** ***** ***** *******, *****’* claims *** ********.

Poll / ****

Comments (28)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
•Jul 22, 2020

****** *** *** ******** ********* ** this ****. **** ** *********** ** see ***** ** ****.

**'** *** * ****** ** ******* inquire ** ** **** ***********, **** yet *** ********.

(4)
Avatar
Joey Walter
•Jul 22, 2020
IPVM • IPVMU Certified
In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

*********** #*,

****** *** *** *******.

**** **** ********* ***** **** ******** and ************.

** *** ***** *** ****** ** dealers ********* *** ** ** **** this, ** ******* ******** ** *** market **** ********?

UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
•Jul 22, 2020
In reply to Joey Walter

* ***** *** *** ****** ***** and **** *********** ***********.

* ****'* ***** ** ******** ***** this ****, *** * ***** ****** search ** "**** ********* *** *******" shows * *********** ********* ** *** for ******* ****. ***** **** ****** a *** ****** *** *** *** a *** ** ****, ******** *** ConnectOne *********** ********, ** **** ****** somewhat **** ******** *****.

(1)
(1)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #2
•Jul 22, 2020

* *** *** ******** ******* ********** at *** **** ****** *** **** product *** **** ******** ** ** the ******. ** ** **** ******* me ******** ***** * ******** ** such *** ******* ***** ** ** a *** ** *-** ****. **** speaking **** ********* *** *** ***** feedback ** ** ****'* ** ** far ******* ** *** ***** ** area ******** * ******* ****** ******** requires *** **** ***** ****** ** an ********* ********.

***** ******* **** ***** ** *** security ******** ** * ************ **** brought ** ****** * ******** **** were ******* ** ********* **** *** start. ** ** ******* **** *** of *** ******* *** ***** ** a ******* ***** ***** *** ******** products *********** **. ** ******** *** link ******* ** ***** **** *** A+ ********** & ******** ************* **** IP ***** **** ******* ********** ********** in *** ******.

(1)
(3)
Avatar
Joey Walter
•Jul 22, 2020
IPVM • IPVMU Certified
In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #2

**** ** ***********, ******!

***** ****** ***** ********** ***** *** "safety *** ********" ** ******* *** there ** ** ******** ***** **** investment *** **** ********.

******* **** ** **** ****** ***** and *** * ******** ** *** security ******** ** *** *********.

U
Undisclosed #3
•Jul 22, 2020

*** **** *** **** *** **** lawsuit.... *** ******* **** ****** *** flysense.com ****** (*** *********** ** ***** own ****) ** * ******** ** douche **** - *** ***** ****** their ******* ** ****** *** *******.

#*****

(15)
(1)
(3)
U
Undisclosed #4
•Jul 22, 2020

** * ********** *** ******* * item *********, ***** *** * ****** sales ***** *** ***** ** * higher ***** **** **** * ******** integrator ***** ******** **** *** ******* unit ***?

*** ******** **** *** *** ***** unit ** ********* *****, *** *** year * *** * ******* *** makes ** **** ********* *******.

UI
Undisclosed Integrator #5
•Jul 22, 2020

**** *** **** .. *** ****** is **** ***********

* ******* *** ** ***** **** in *** **** *** * ******* link ** ***** ******* *** **** left * ********* **** **** ******* like ** ********* ******* (*** ****). Eventually, * ***** **** **** **** in **** ****, ******** *** ** interest *** **** ******* ***** **** comparisons ******* ******** *** ****. **** products **** ****** ******* ********, *** the **** ********** ** *** **** was **** ******** *** * ****** model, *** ** ****, *** * more ****** *** ************ **** *********; wheras **** *** ***** ********* *** had ** *** **** ******** *** its ******** *******. *******, **** *** not ******* * ******* ** ****** service ***.

* *** ** **** ** ** has ******* ******* ** **** **** is ****** *** **** ** "*********" or ********** ***** *** **** ****** the *** **** ** ****** *** monitor **** **** ***** *** * also ***** **** *** ****** *** with ** ******** ****** **** ** well. **** **** **** **** ********** now ***** *** *** ********* **** was ********* *******.

** ***** **** ** *** **** I ******* *** ** ***** ** mid **** **** ***** ****** *** still ********** ********** *** ******** *** the ******** * *** ****** ** see **** *** ***** **** ****** seemed ** ******** **** ***** ** the ***** ***** ******** ***** **** showing **** ** ***** ****** *** the **** *** ***** *** ** to ***** *************. **** ***** ** because ***** *****'* ** **** **** units *** ***** ** **** ******** about, *** ** *** **** **** Soter ****'* *** ***** *** ***** time.

*'* **** * ******* *** ********** of *** ********* *** ************ ** each *******'* ******* ***** **** * lot ********* **** *** *** * saw **** ***** * ****** ***. Each ******* *** ***** * ********* market ******** *** ****, *** **** is **** **** ******** ** *** security *** **** ********** ****** **** Soter, ***** ***** ******* ** ** marketing ** **** ******** ***** ******* within *** ******/********* ******.

**** ***** ***** ****** ** ***********, and ** *****, *** ******* **** make * *** ** ***** ***** this ***** ** *******.

(1)
(3)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #6
•Jul 22, 2020

*** ***** **** ********* ******* ********** popular ** *******? * **** *** participated ** ****** **** ** ****** a ******. ******* ** ******* **** detection ** ***** ***** ***** ** any *******. ******* ********* ** * surprisingly ****** ******* *** ***** **** detection.

Avatar
Brandon Knutson
•Jul 22, 2020
IPVMU Certified
In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #6

****** *** ** ******** ** ****** restrooms ***** ** *** ******** ******* schools. * **** ** **** ** schools *** ********** *****, *** **** are ********** *** ** ***** ****.

(1)
JH
John Honovich
•Jul 22, 2020
IPVM
In reply to Brandon Knutson

*******, ******! ******* - **** *** you ******* ** *** ****** **** about ***** *********** *********?

(1)
Avatar
Brandon Knutson
•Jul 22, 2020
IPVMU Certified
In reply to John Honovich

* *****'* ***** ******** ** **** screening, *** **** ********* ********* **** bigger ********* ** **** *** **** fall. *** *********** *********, ** ******** is ****, * *** ** **** be ******** ************ ******** ** ****** room **********.

(2)
(1)
(2)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #7
•Jul 27, 2020

** ** ********** ********.***, *** ****'* pick ** *** ~$*/**** **** *** .com/.edu/.org *** ******* ** *** *******? I'm *** ****** **** ** ***** Corp *** *** **, ***** ***** to ** * *** ** ********* on *** **** ** * ********* on ************. *** *********, *** ******'* you ******** *** ***** ******** ** your *******?

(3)
EM
Eliezer Martinez
•Aug 17, 2020

*** ******* * **** ** **** for *** * *** *** **** Detection ** * ****** ******** ***** Soter's ******** ******* ** *** ******* offered. * ***** ***** ** **** until ********* ****** ** ***** ******* Halo ** ***** *****. ** ****** like * ****** ******* ** ** opinion. ***** ****'* **** ** **** their ***** ******** **** * ********* standpoint *** **** ****'* ****** ********** the ******** *** *** **** ** Video ***. ** ***** ******** ** integrator ******** ***** ***** ****'*. **** allows *** *********** **** ******* ***** Soter *****'* ** ** *********. ** just ***** **** ** ***** *** better ************* ** *** ******** *** knows *** ******* *** ******* ** K-12's ******. ***** **** ***** *** as ***** ***** **.

(2)
Avatar
Joseph Marotta
•Nov 18, 2020
IPVMU Certified

************* **% ** *** ********** ******** I ****** *** *** *-** *** higher ********* *******. **** *** *** first **** * ****** ***** ** to ******* **** ******* ** * new ****** ****** *******. ****** ******, other ****** ********* **** ********** **** sensors ** ***** ******** ****. * searched *** *** ******** ******** *** Halo ***. ***** **** ****** **** very *******, *** *** ********* ************ of *** **** ******* ****** **** more *************, *** **** ****'* **** annual *********** ****. ******** *** ****** reoccurring **** ** $*** *** ******. Now **** ****** ********* *** ** what * *********, * **** **** a ****/*******/**** ********** ** ******** *** Halo ** *** ****** ******** *** decide *** **********.

JH
John Honovich
•Nov 21, 2020
IPVM

******: ***** ** * ****** ******* filed ** ***** ******** ****** ************ by ** ***** ****.*** *****'* *********.

***** *** ******* *** * "****** *** ****** for *********** ****** *** ********" (**********). *** ********** *** **** ******, as ******* ** *** ********* **:

IPVM Image

******************* *** ******* ** **** **, 2020.

** ***** **** ********* **** *** answer ** *** *********, ******** **** **** *** ******* to ******* ******** ***** ******, ** 2014, *.*.:

IPVM Image

********, ** ***** **** **** **** signed ** *** **** *** ** 2016, ******* **** *********** **** ****, notably ***** *****'* ****** *** ***** Peterson *** ** *** ********:

IPVM Image

* **** ** *** ** ***** Corp / *** *** *** *********.

*****'* *** ***** *********'* ******** ************ *** ** * ** ** both ******** *********** *** ******** *********** at *** **** ** **** ***:

IPVM Image

** ***** **** ** ******* ** dismiss **** ****** ****.***** ***** * ****** ** ******* 16 ******* ******* ****.

* ******* ********** ******** **, ****, **** * schedule *** *** *** **** *** months:

IPVM Image

JH
John Honovich
•Mar 01, 2021
IPVM

******: **** ***** ******* *** ******* ******* ********** *****'* *********:

**********’ ****** ** ******* *** ********* is ******* ** ****. *** ****** brought ** ********** **** **********’ ******* misrepresentation **** *** **** ****** ** “compatible ****” *** ******** ******** *** DISMISSED **** *********. ***** *** *** product ************* ** ********* ******* *********. The ********* ****** ******* ********** *+ Technology *** ******* *** ********* ******* prejudice. *** ***** ** ***** ** respectfully ******** ** ********* ***** *******. Plaintiff ** ******* ***** ** **** a ****** ******* ********* ****** ** days ** *** **** ** **** Opinion *** *****.

JH
John Honovich
•Mar 30, 2021
IPVM
In reply to John Honovich

***** *** *** ***** * ****** amended *********

********************************************* - ****** ******* ***********************-**-***********.*

* *** *** ***** **** ** new ** ******** ** *** *********.

JH
John Honovich
•Apr 09, 2021
IPVM
In reply to John Honovich

***** ** *** ******* ***** ** file * ********** *********, ****** **** ***:

** *** ********** *********** ** ******* of *** ********* ************ *** ****** competition ****** ***** **** **** ********** after **** ******** ** **********’ ****** to *******.

*** ******** ** **** ** ***** Corp **** *****'* ********* ***** (**** Soter) ** ******** ** *********:

IPVM Image

******* *** *** ******** ***** ******* *********.

JH
John Honovich
•Apr 26, 2021
IPVM
In reply to John Honovich

***,** ***** **** *** *********** *** *** ******* *********. *** two **** ******, **** * ***** scan ** *** ****, ** **** IP ***** ****'* ********* ****** *** domain ********.*** *** **** **** *** marketing ********* *** *****'* ********:

********** ***** **** ******* ********* ** keywords **** ******** *** ***** “***” and “*****” *** ** ******** **** included *** **** “*****,” ** **** as *** ***** ********, ********** ** descriptive ***** ** ********** ***** ** IPVideo, ** **** ** * ******* marketing **** *** ******** ** *******’* outside ********** *** *******, ***

*******, ** ***** **** **** **** they **** *** * *** ******* sessions **** ****** * **** *** only * ******* ********:

********** ***** **** ****** ********* **** September *, **** ** **** **, 2020 *** *** ****** ******** **** the ****** *** **** *** ***** and *** ******** *** *******, **** two ***********/******** ** ***** *** ***** submitted * ******* ******* **** ** IPVideo

*** **** ****** ****:

******* ** ***** ******** *** ** any ***** ** *** **** ******.

***, **** ****** **** ***** ******* "did *** ***** ******** *********" *** that "********* *** *** ******** *** compensable ******* ******* ** *** ******* by *** *********. ** ***** **** made ** ******* ** * ****** of *** ********* ** *** ****** name ** *** ******* *******."

***** ********* *** **** ** ******** more ** ***** **** **** *** possible ********** ** ********.

JH
John Honovich
•Sep 02, 2021
IPVM

*** ****** **** ************* ***** ****** ** ****** ** Video **** ** ****** ********** ** Halo ****** ****:

** ********* ********* ***** ************, *** and *****-***** ********* ***** ******** ** this ******, *** ***** ******** ** Your *****’* ********** ******** ***.*.* ** move ** ****** ********** ** ****** inspection ** ****** **** *** ********* they ******, ** *** **, ****, to ******. ******** ** ********** ******** III.A.1 *** ***** ***** **.* & 37.3, * ******* **** ******* *** Plaintiff *** ********** *** *** ********* by ********* ** ****** ** *** were ****** ** ******* **** *******.

JH
John Honovich
•Sep 08, 2021
IPVM
In reply to John Honovich

********* *+ ****************:

*********’* ********* ****** ** ******** ** the ******* ********* ** **** ***** to ***** ********* ** ***** ************ and ********** ** *** **** ** motions.

JH
John Honovich
•Sep 15, 2021
IPVM
In reply to John Honovich

***** *** ***** **** *+ / IP ***** ****, *** ***, ** this ******:

*** ***** ***** **** ** ** appropriate *** *** ******* ** ***** complete *** ******* ******* ****** ***** Brown. ********* ** *** ******* ** that *******, ********* *** ****** ** this ***** **** ***** ***** *** made *** ******* ********.

JH
John Honovich
•Oct 13, 2021
IPVM

*** ******* ** ********** *********** ********* (*** **** *** *****):

*****'* * ****** ******* *** ******* about *** ******* ** "*********" ************ as ** ******* ** ******, ** the ***** *********:

***** **** *** *********** ** **** as *** ********* ** *******, ** became ***** **** **** *** ******* proves ********: *** ******* ** “*********** matching ********* ** ******” ***, **** specifically “*********” ** **** ** *** independent ******

*** ***** ******* ** ***** ****'* proposed ************:

*** ***** ****** *** **********’ [** Video ****] ******** ************ ** “**********” to ***: “********** ****** ** *** properties ***/** ******** ** *** **** include ***********, ********, *** ******** ****** that ***** ******** ******** *** ******** of ******.”

***,***** ***** ** ****** ** ****** inspection** ** ***** ****'* ****** **** and**** * ****** ** *** ***** intending** **** ** ******* *********'* ******.

JH
John Honovich
•Dec 15, 2021
IPVM

**** ********** *********, ****** -

***********************************************************-**-***********.*

********* ***** ************ ***** * ****** to ********** **** *****’* ***** ************ Order, ***** ********* ********* ******* ***** errors. ** ***. *** *** ******* stated *****, *** *********’* ****** *** reconsideration ** ******.

*** ***** ******** ** ******* ******* “ranges” ** “************” *** ************* *** construction ** “*********.” ** ** ** to *** **** ** ****** ******* the *** ** * “*****” ** “measurements” ***** ***** *** ***** ** the *****.

(1)
(1)
JH
John Honovich
•Jan 17, 2022
IPVM

**** **** *********, ** ***** *******:

**********’ (“***”) ****** ** ***** *** First ******* *************(***. **) *******: (*) IPV ****** ******* ** ******* *********; (ii) *** ******** ********** *** ****** and ***** ********* ***** *** ********; and (***) *** ****** ** ****** with **** *****’* ***** ********* * good ***** ****** ** ******* ******** before ****** * ****** *** ****** Circuit *** ********* ******* ******* ********* to ****** ******** ******* ********* ** their *******.

AH
Adam Huss
•Jan 17, 2022
Kuns Northcoast Security
In reply to John Honovich

**** * ****** **** * ***** glance ** **** ** *** *****'* third ******* ** ****, *** *** has ****** ****, ** *** *********, most ** *** *********/*?

*'* ********** ** **** ** **** sensors *** ******** ****** ***** * hot **** ***** ***. **'** ********* them ** ***** ** **** *******, with ** ****** ****** ******** (***** seven *******, ***** **** ***** **** from **) ** *** ****** *** adding ****.

JH
John Honovich
•Jan 24, 2022
IPVM

*** ****** **** *** **** ******. On *** ****, ****** *****:

***** ***************** *** *** ****** **********.Plaintiff's ****** ** ******* *** ******, **** *********, ***** **** **(*)(*) ** ****** **** *** *******. The application for attorneys' fees and costs is DENIED. Defendants are to advise the Court in writing by******* **, ****** ** ******* **** **** ** undertake *** *********** **** *** **** of ********** **** ***** *************, ******** that **** ************* ****** ******* ******. Absent **** *******, *** **** ***** be ******. ******* ** ***** **** R. ***** ***/**/****. [******** *****]

*** **** ** *** ****:

***** ** ****** *** *** ****** Conference *** **/** **:** ** ***** re110 . **********' ************* *** *****-***** claims *** ****** ********* ******* *********. The ***** ** ***** ** ************ directed ** ***** *** ****. ******* by ***** **** *. ***** ** 1/21/2022

** ** *** ***** ** ** why *** **** ***** *** *** we *** *** **** *** ******** explanation ** *** ***** *******.