*******
*** ***** ******* **********/***** Sony *******, *** ****** is * ***** *********** upgrade **** ******** ****** in *** ***** *** WDR ***********, ** * similar ***** ***** ** the ******* ****** ****.
*******, ***** ***** ***** manufacturers' ******* *** ******** ** find *** *********** ** any ******** ********** ****** to ******, *** *** high ******** ******** ** others *** ********** ** for ****.
Key ********
**** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:
- ***** ******* *** *****:*** ****** ******** ********** fewer ******* ** **** test ******* *** ***** in *** ***** ****** (<1lx) **** ****, ******, and ********* ******* ******.
- **** ** *****:*******, *** ** ************ was *** ******* ** cameras ******, ***** **** Hanwha, ~***'/***, ****** *** is **** *** ** this *****, ~*.
- **** ** *******:** ******* ******** *** more **** **** ***** cameras ******, **** ** center ************ *** **** dimming ** ***** ** the ***.
- ***** *** ***********:*** ****** ********* **** in **** *** ****** tested, ****** **** **** Hanwha *** *********, ****** provided ******** **** ****** than *** **** ***** in **** ******.
- **** ********* ***********:*** ******'* ********* *********** was *** ******* ** cameras ****** ** *** due ** *** **** of ***** ******, ***** all ***** ****** ****** include (** ** **** manufacturers ** ****).
*******
***** ** **** *** Sony's *********** ****** *********, the ******'* ********* ****** price ** ** **** with ***** ****** ******, such ** *** **** P3225-LVE ** **, ***** starlight *****, ** ********* S2531L (*** $***-***), *** moderately ****** **** *** Hanwha ***-***** *** ********* 4526 (**** ~$***-***).
Low ***** ***********
** *** ***** ** ~20' *** **** ******** less ****** ** *** subject *** **** ***** than *** ***** ******* tested, **** *** *******'* face ********* *******/*******. *** Hanwha ******* * ******* displayed *** **** ******* ** the ******* (****** **** some ****** ************ ** lower/small **** *****), ***** both *** **** *****-*** and ********* **** ******* more ****** ** *** subject's ******** **** *** EM642.
******* **** *** *******, with *** ******* ** ~26, ** ****** ****** produced ******* ****** ******* in **** *****, **** all ********** ******* ***** or *********** ****** *** impossible ** ********. *******, notable *********** ** **** legibility *** *******.
*** ****** ** ************ by *** ****** ******* X, ***** ******** ******* of *** ***** ** the ****** ****, ** well *** **** *****-*** which ***** **** ******* letters. **** *** ****** and ********* **** ******* no ******* ****.
IR *******
*** ***-*****'* ** ************ was ********** **** ****** the **** ***** ** view, ******** ****** ** the *****, ******** *******.
*******, ******** ** ****** such ** ****, **** illumination ********** ** **** less ******, **** ******* to *** **** ******** pattern ** *********, ***** below.
IR *****
** *** *****, *** Sony ***-****** ******* *** specified ** ***** ** 60m/~195', **** *** ******* clearly ******* ** **** 200'. *******, ****** *** foot at **** ******** ** low, **** ** ******* telephoto ***** ******, **** about * ***, ****** anything *** ********* **********. The ****** ******* * is *** **** ***** camera ** **** **** with * ********* ** range ******* *** ***** (50m/164') ***** ** *******, reaching ***'+ ***** *****.
*** ***** ***** ***** the ***** **** *** subject ******** ** ~***' distance, *** ******'* *********** max ** *****. ******* are ***, *** ** is ******* ***********.
Exterior **** *** ***********
** ****** ******* ******* an ******** **** ** see *** **** ******* *** harsh ******* ***** *** change ** ************ ** the **** ****** *** closed. *** ****** ****** from ~** ****** ** 1,300lx ******* (****** *** difference).
** **** *****, *** Axis *****-*** ******** ****, with *** ******** ******* details **** ******* ** inside, ***** *** ***** suffers **** **** ************ of *** ******* ******* and **** ******* ** the **** *** **********. Both *** ********* *** Hanwha ****** ********** **** discoloration *** **** ** contrast, ******** ******* **********.
*** **** ***** ***** these ******* ** ****** as *** ******* ******, moving **** ******* ** inside.
Overhead **** *** ***********
** **** ****** *** in * **** ******* scene **** ****** ********, a************* **** ******** ****. Lux ****** **** ~**** lux ** ****** **** the **** ** ~*** lux ******, * *** variance.
*** ****** *** **** cameras ******* **** ** this *****, ******* ***** details ** *** ******* against *** ****** *********, though ******* ********** ** the ****** **** ****** the ****. *** ****** and ********* ******* **** lose ******* ****** ******* due ** ******* ******** and ************* ** *** face. **** **** *** XNV-6080R ******** *** **** details **** ** *** dark **** ** *** scene.
Daytime ***** *******
** *** *****, *** SNC-EM642R ********* ********* ** the ****, ******, *** Hikvision ****** ******. ****** there **** **** **** slight ***********, ********* ******* were ******* *** **** across *** ******.
**** *** **** ** short ***** (~**'/~*****):
** **** ** ****** range, **** *** ******** to ~**.
Lens **********: ****** **. ****
** ****** **** ******* at *** ****** *** side of *** ***** ** view ** *** *** clarity ****** ** *** lens' *****, ***** *****:
*** ****** ****** **** clarity ** *** ****' edge **** ****** **** some ******** **********. **** that **** ***** *** similar ** ***** *******. However, ** **** ***** lengths *** * ***** varied ***** ******* ** this ****, ** ****** directly ******* *** ***** to ******.
Sony **. *********
** ****** *** ********* S2531L ******* *** **** EM642 ** ******** ** the ******* *****, *** omitted ** ** ***** comparisons *** ** **** of *****. ** **** included ***** *********** *** reference ***** **** *** Panasonic *** ******** ***********.
** *** *****, *** S2531L *** **** ******* **** the ******, ********* ******* of *** *******'* **** and ******* ** *** test *****.
****'* *** *********** *** also ****** **** *** S2531L. **** ******* **** overexposed, *** ********* ******** from ********/********* ** *** subject ** ****.
No ***** *****/**** ********* ***********
*** ******'* ******** **** much ****** **** **** cameras ******, *** ** its **** ** ***** codecs, **** **** *** Bosch ***** ********* *********** its ********* ******* (****** still ~**% *****). **** that **** ******** *** with * *** ** the ***, ****** ***** recent ****** **** ** the**************, ***** ** *** have * **** *** implementation.
Physical ********
*** ****** ** ******* ** past **** ******* ***** as **** ** ***** manufacturers' ******* **** ** the ********* ****, *** noticeably ****** **** ******, shown *****:
*******, *** ***-****** ******** a ********* ****** **** inside *** ******* *** camera. ******** **** *** zoom/focus ******** ***** ****** the ****, *** ****** may ** ***** *** focused ***** * **** monitor ******* ** ** IP ************ **** ** laptop, ***** *** **** installation. **** ******* ** not ******, *** ** not ******** ** *** Axis, *****, ** ********* domes ******.
** ****** ***** *** other ******** ******** ** the ****** ** **** video:
Test **********
*** **** ** ** date ******** *** **** at *** **** ** testing:
- **** ***-******: *.*.*
- **** *****-***: *.**.*.*
- ***** ********* ** ********* 7000VR: *.**.****
- ****** ***-*****: *.*********
- ********* **-**********-***: **.*.**
- ********* **-******: *.**
Sony has released their latest generation, claiming improved WDR and low light, increased IR range, and more. We tested the SNC-EM642R outdoor IR vandal dome to see how these new models stack up against the latest from others, including:
Comments (3)
Geoffrey King
Thanks IPVM team for your thorough review. It's becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish features from one top-tier camera to the next, yet this report is very well detailed.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #1
My impression is Hanwha is the real dark horse here. The one bringing the best value of performance and price combination in the mid to upper tier. As a long time Sony dealer and proponent, this is disappointing.
Create New Topic
Franky Lam
08/24/17 03:42am
As I use to work for Hanwah SAMSUNG (Sole Distributor in HKG) for more than 5 years, and now I switch my role back to SI. I do find both quality and performance of SONY and SAMSUNG are near. But in some real case of project, and I find SONY is best outcome than AXIS and SAMSUNG.
Create New Topic