10MP vs 5MP vs HD Shootout

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Nov 20, 2013

HD cameras are commonplace. Everyone offers 1080p. The big question now is how much better is 5MP or 10MP? Is a 10MP camera 5 times better than 1080p as pixel count proponents claim?

In this report, we share test results of a head to head shootout between 1080p, 5MP and 10MP cameras. For this test, we bought 3 compact box cameras from Arecont (3MP AV3116, 5MP AV5115, and 10MP AV10115), known for both their unrealistic claims and high resolution offerings. This allowed us to eliminate any variances across manufacturers and focus simply on the advantages and disadvantages of varying resolution

Key Questions Answered

Our tests answered the following key questions:

  • How much more details did the higher resolution cameras deliver at 20', 50', 100' wide FoVs?
  • Which camera was the best in low light and by how much?
  • Which camera was the best in strong backlight scenes - the WDR HD camera or the higher resolution 5MP or 10MP ones?

** ******* *** ***********. ******** ****** *****. *** *** ******** now ** *** **** ****** ** *** ** ****?*** **** ****** * ***** ****** **** ***** ** ***** count ********** *****?

** **** ******, ** ***** **** ******* ** * **** to **** ******** ******* *****, *** *** **** *******. *** this ****, ** ****** * ******* *** ******* **** ******* (3MP ******, *** ******, *** **** *******), ***** *** **** their *********** ****** *** **** ********** *********. **** ******* ** to ********* *** ********* ****** ************* *** ***** ****** ** the ********** *** ************* ** ******* **********

Key ********* ********

*** ***** ******** *** ********* *** *********:

  • *** **** **** ******* *** *** ****** ********** ******* ******* at **', **', ***' **** ****?
  • ***** ****** *** *** **** ** *** ***** *** ** how ****?
  • ***** ****** *** *** **** ** ****** ********* ****** - the *** ** ****** ** *** ****** ********** *** ** 10MP ****?

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** ******** **** **** ****:

*** **** *****

  • ** **** ***** **** ********** ***** ****** ** **** (~**' and *****), * *** ** ** ******* ********* ** ********* gain ** ******* ** *** **** ***** *** ******* ******** to *** *****..
  • ********** ********** *** ** ~**', *** ***** ****** ***** **** details ** **** ******* *** ***** ***** *** * *** 10 ** ******* ******* ************ ******* ******* *** ***** **********.
  • ******** *** *** ** ~***', **** *** * *** ** MP ******* ******* ******* ******* ** *** *******, ***** ** was *********** * **** ** *** ***** *****. **** **** provides *** ********** ** *** **** *****, **** ** **** 2.

*** ***** ***** / ******* *** (*-***)

  • ** ***** *****, ******* ******* *-* ***, ** * **' HFOV *** *** ****** ******** *** **** ******** ******* *** light *********** *** **********, ********** **** *** ******* ******* **** both *** ***** *** **** ******.
  • ** **' ********** *** ** ***** *****, ******* * ** 10 ** ******* ******** *** ****** ** *** **** *******, but *** **** ********** ***** *** ***** ******* (****** **** the ***** ****) ** *** *** ******. *** ***** ****** provided ***** ******* ** *** *******, *** *** ***** *** barely *******.
  • ** ***** ***** ** ~***' ***, *** ***** ****** *** able ** ******* ********* ** *** *******, *** *** *******. Neither *** * *** ** ** ******* ******** *** ****** video ** **** *****.
  • ** ********, * ***** ***** '***** ***' ***** **** ******, delivered *** ******** ****** ****** *** **** ***** ** **** as ****** ** *** ****** ***.

*** *** ***** (*** *** *****)

  • ** ***** **** ******, *** *****, ***, *** **** ******* did *** ******* ****** ******* ** ******* ** ***** ** *** range. *** ***** ****** *** **** ** ********* ****** *** chart, *** *** *** *******.
  • *** ***** ***** ***** *** ***** **** ****** ** **** range ********* ******** ******, ****** ******* *********** ******* *** ** extremely *** ***** ******.

***

  • *** ***** **** *** ****** ******* *** ****** **** ** both ***** *** **** *****. *** **** ********* *** *** 10MP's ******* ** **** ***** ***** ** *** **** ***** but **** *** ***** ****.
  • *** **** ****** ******* *** ******** ******* **** ** *** WDR ***** ****, *** ****** **** *** *** ***********. *******, in *** **** **** **** ** *** ******** ****, ******* camera ******** ******* ** *** *******.

***************

** **** *****, ********** ***** *** ***** ** *** *********** are * *******, ***** ** ***** * ****** ****** **** higher ***********. * *** ** ** *******, ***** ********** ****** pixels *** ****, ****** **** ****** *********** ** ***** ******.

** ****** *** ******, **** ** **** *** ******** ***** or *** ******* ****, * *** ** ** ********** ****** advantages ****** **** ****** ** **** (**'+). ** ***** ******, 1080p ** **** **** ****** ** ******* ********* *******.

** *** ******, **** *** ******* ****** ** ****. ***** the **** ***** ** **** **** ********* ****** **** *** 5MP ***********, **** **** ************ ** *** **** *****-******** ***** model. *******, ***** **** *** ** ********* *** ********* ** cameras ***** ***, ** ***** ***** **** ** *****-**** ******* docks, **** *** ** ********** *** ** *** ****** *** performance. 

FOV ***********

** **** *** ********* *********** ******** ** ** ******** ***, at ***** ***** ******. ***** *** ******** ***** *** ****** ***** ******. 

**** *****, ~***-*** ***

** * ********** ***** ** **** ** ~**', *** * and ** ** ******* ** *** ******* **** ********* ******* than *** ***** ******. *** ******* ** ************ ** *** three, **** *** ***** ******* ** **** */* ** **** the ***** ******.

** * **' ****, *******, *********** ****** ********. *** * and ** ** ******* ******* **** **** ******** ** *** subject, **** *** ***** ********* ******* **** ***** *****.

*******, ******** *** ***** ** **** ** ***', **** ****** the **** ***********, **** ****** ******* ** *** *******, *** the ***** *** ****** ***** ** *** ***** ***********.

***** *****

** **** *****, ******* ******** ******** ******* *-* ***, ********* on********. ** * **' ********** ***, *** *** ***** *** the ***** ****** ** ******* ** *** ******* *** *****. The *** ***** ****** ******** **** ***** *** *********** ** this ***** *****, ********* **** *******. *** **** ***** ******* shows *** **** *****, *** ** ******* ** *** *******. All *** ************ ** * **** *** ***** ********* ******, shown *** *********.

** * **' ****, *** *** ****** ***** ***** **** detail ** *** **** *****, *** *** ******* ** ****** impossible ** ***. *** ***** ****** ***** **** ******* *** chart, ****** ******* *** *******, ***** *** **** ***** ** barely **** ** *** *** **** *****.

 

*******, ** *** ****** ***, ***', *** ***** ***** *** 720p *** ***** ****** ***** ******* ********* ** *** ******* and *****. *** *** ***** ********* ***** ****** ** *** test *****, ***** *** **** ****** ** ****** *****, **** high ****** ** *****.

****,

*******, ** * ***** **** *****, *** ***** ****** ** able ** ****** *** **** *****, *** ******** ** *******. Both * *** **** ******* **** *********** *****, **** ** usable *****.

** * **' ****, *** ***** ****** ****** **** *** chart ** ***.

*** *******, ***** * ***' ****, **** ** *** ************** ** ******* ****** *****, **** **** *** **** *** light ****** **** ********* ********* *** *****.

WDR ***********

** **** *** ***********, ** *** ** *** ******* ** a ********* **** * **** **** ******** ****, ******** * 20x ******** ** *** ******, **** ** **** *****:

*** ***** **** *** ****** *** *** ***** **** ********* in **** *****. *******, *** **** *****, *** ** *** higher **********, ********* **** ** *** ****** ************ ** *** overhead ****, ** ****. ******* * *** **** ****** ******** details ** *** **** **** **** **** ** *** ****.

Interior ******* **********

******** *********** ** * *** ** ** ********** *** ** seen ** **** ******* **** **** *** ****** ********* *****. ** **** ****, *** ************ **** ***** *** ****, being *** **** ******* ******* ********** *** ***** ******** ** this *****, ***** ** *** ** ******.

Test **********

*** ******* **** **** ** ******* ******** *** **** ****, with *** ********* ** ********, ***** *** ********** ** ****, and *******, ***** *** ****** ***.

*** ********* ******** ******** **** ****:

  • ******* *** ****** - *****
  • ******* *** ****** - *****
  • ******* **** ******* - *****
  • ***** ***-**** - ********

Comments (34)

Ethan

You were not referring to other aspects, which I believe are important as well. Do you have any information on the bandwidth consumption differences between the 3 types, as well as the effective frame rate each camera produces?

Thanks

Ariel

I, too, would be interested in the bandwidth comparison if one is available.

The claimed frame rates are 21/14/7, respectively, for the 1080p, 5MP, and 10MP cameras. We found that 5 FPS was the max the 10MP camera would consistently output, though.

Bandwidth was tricky. Despite all three cameras coming from the same series from the same manufacturer, with all other settings standardized, and running at 5 FPS, there was not a clear upward trend in bandwidth as resolution went up. There are obvious sensor differences in sharpness and saturation which are at play here, and differing gain control on each of them which make it difficult to compare apples to apples. Because of all the above, we chose not to include it here.

Great report! I like the by the numbers, to the point reports. Thanks.

My guess is that the 10MP camera did better in your wide dynamic scene only because of the coincidental exposure strategy used. I would not take that result as an indicator of the camera to do well with other wide dynamic scenes. If you need a camera capable of properly imaging scenes with wide dynamic range, you need to use a camera designed for wide dynamic range imaging.

Jeff, can you elaborate on "coincidental exposure strategy"?

The camera picked whatever exposure strategy it thought applied to the scene. That's what I meant by coincidental. Even though the cameras came from the same manufacturer, it doesn't mean that they necessarily apply the same exposure strategy to a given scene. Cameras are typically tuned independently, and often by different people. The 10MP camera could have simply "lucked out" with that particular scene.

We have done many tests over the years and found that more pixels has a 'WDR' like effect and it's not just a coincidence. (Go back to our first WDR test when we had a 5MP non WDR, true WDR 720p and Pixim - same pattern). Specifically, the greater pixels do help in areas that are not overexposed (i.e., the 10MP is better than the 5MP here, specifically because the greater pixels help). However, looking at both sides (dark area), clearly the 10MP (and 5MP) has problems across broad ranges of light.

That said, we agree that a true WDR camera is still better for WDR scenes overall.

I think that your "WDR-like" effect is actually the effect of a higher MTF from the higher resolution camera. As you said, "...the greater pixels do help in areas that are not overexposed". WDR exposure strategies are supposed to prevent overexposure.

Jeff, are you saying that the 10 MP sensor's frequency response happened to have dips where the scene had crests and crests where it had dips?

Maybe Ethan had some calibration shots with an MTF chart?

C

What a great set of pics. How far out is the subject in the 50' HFOV, approx?

Bump for subject depth vs hfov...

C

Maybe take this report a bit farther...since more pixels on the same size sensor means smaller pixels that require more light or does it?

The cost of a device increases for each change in size or does it?

Is using the right lense is very important? Where are all the details for the lens that you used for each camera? e.g. format, mount, focal length, F no, iris type, filter, etc. What are the costs for a lens @ 1MP, 3MP, 5MP or 10MP?

Why would anyone deploy a camera over 3MP or 1080p/1440p when lensing and storage costs go up significantly, or does it?

We used Arecon't recommended lenses for each of the cameras.

The 1080p camera used an F1.2 3-8mm, $100-120 online.

5/10MP used F1.8 4.5-10mm. About $220 online. Note that this lens had the lowest F-stop of any of the recommended lenses.

So yes, there is a price increase in lensing.

The video experts in the photography and broadcast industry absolutely say the lens and camera are a system equivalently matched for performance. There for a 10MP camera and a 10MP lens are required to optimally acquire an image. Arecont has yet to reveal whether they have accurately done this in marketing to their customers.

Is IPVM testing MP cameras with a matched lens?

Lenses for cameras above 5MP are hardly easy to come by in C/CS formats much less in a variable focal length in any format from 1/3 to 1". Here is what I found in 1/2" format which the Arecont is 1/2.5" @ 5MP and 1/2.3" @ 10MP :

Space - nothing over 3MP with vari-focal

Fujinon DV4x12.5SR4A-SA1L is 5MP lens for about $387 (amazon) DC iris/ir corrected

Computar E3Z4518CS-MPIR is 5MP lens for about $ 243 (amazon) manual iris

Tamaron had 1/2.7" and 1/2" format MP vari-focal lenses however nothing over 3MP is defined on their web site.

Tokina TVR4518HDDCIR is 5MP 1/2" format with DC iris @F1.8. This is probably the lens sold by Arecont. $219 online @ B&H

Avigilon uses a EF type lens to open up the range of lensing options available in the higher MP range. These type of lenses have a wide range of costs from $600 to over $1500 depending on focal length and size.

So is the question of value versus function still a valid debate when the cost of the device and storage go up at a rate of 2X or more with the same rate in less performance when there is less/more light?

David, we used the Arecont approved lens - UHD45-10 which Arecont markets as being "Ultra HD Megapixel Vari-Focal Lenses Are Used In Conjunction With Arecont Vision 5MP And 10 MP MegaVideo Cameras To Deliver Maximum Performance And Image Quality."

I still wonder if that is truly a 'real' 10MP lens. That said, the issues for 10MP in this test all have to do with lighting (either low or harsh) - something that is more an imager / processing issue rather than primarily lens constrained.

Would using a F1.8 lens reduce the low light perfomance of the 1080p cam to levels similar to the 5mp (which used a F1.8)?

It's a false premise because 1080p cameras have widely available low F stop lenses where 5MP and 10MP ones do not.

Certainly a lower F stop helps but (1) I doubt it's all or even most of the difference and (2) it would be unfair and unrealistic to handicap the 1080p camera to match the deficiency of a 5MP or 10MP solution.

Btw, I do think one good counter would be to compare against a better 5MP camera - which I suspect the Axis P1357 would be. This is a potential future test.

For this one, the deciding factor is that we wanted to test a 10MP camera but Axis (and most major manufacturers do not offer them).

Actually the Bosch Flexidome Micro 5MP that we've got in our upcoming test performed surprisingly well in low light. And by "surprisngly well", at least it produced an image instead of being all black. This is 1lx in the conference room:

I don't believe Bosch has any higher end cameras at that resolution, though. No boxes or domes.

What bit rate was each camera set at?

We use VBR on tests, so the bit rate is allowed to fluctuate to keep the quality / quantization constant.

Are you using testing the AV3116 at 3MP or 1080p? The AV3116 is their 3MP WDR where as the AV2116 is their 1080p WDR. And if at 1080p, curious as to why you would step down the res instead of using the 1080p model out of the gate, or just test at the 3MP full res.

We ran tests internally at both using the AV3116v1. We showed / featured HD mainly because many people are caught up by HD specs (i.e., 1080p is 'true' HD).

As for image details in the test, 3MP vs 1080p is not going to make a big difference as almost all of the benefits of 3MP vs 1080p comes from the increased vertical coverage (1536 vs 1080). That said, in practice, I would typically recommend the 4:3 3MP over a 16:9 1080p (see our Aspect Ratio Shootout) simply to get the taller FoV.

It would really help if you'd add moving targets into the analysis. Our biggest problem is the static 10mp view is great, but the minute someone or a car enters the frame moving it's always blurry and at low light it's totally useless.

Dan, thanks for raising this.

What's most likely happening there is that many camera manufacturers default to slow shutters (Axis is often 1/6s, I believe Arecont is 1/8s). That's what is causing the blur.

Here is a visual example of slow shutter/high blur vs normal shutter/no blur:

We run all tests at 'normal' 1/30s shutter which eliminates most blur and more importantly evens performance (since some manufacturers go for really slow shutters as a default and others go for more 'normal' ones).

This is also important when testing cameras because if 1 camera defaults shutter to 1/6s and the other to 1/30s, the former will get 5x more light, which will make a massive difference.

Does that help?

That does although we’re stuck with Axis 1604 as the best overall camera running the shutter speed at 1/120 otherwise if someone starts running or we can’t read the license plates. Does anyone know how arecont got that night shots they show as demo somewhere in asia? I’d love to get that quality but they won’t say what they used.

Ethan and John,

I'm still struggling with the HFOV factor in your tests. If I look at the three boxes in the three variations of HFOV from 20' to 50' to 100' (with the red boxes around the subject) the shot is the same in all three but the subject is further away. What I mean about HFOV is that the same section of the cars on both the left and right side are showing identically. So since I think I've read that the distance "from" the camera to the target doesn't matter as much as does the HFOV, how are any of these shots different other than the distance to target?

I do not understand the premise of your question. The cameras are mounted side by side on the same pole, which is stationary for the entire series of tests. We then move the subject progressively farther from the camera. As the subject moves out, the FoV becomes wider (e.g., 20', 50', 100').

See our FoV Tutorial.

Danny I think I see where you are coming from...

The HFOV is dependent upon an object(s) of interest, i.e. 'the subject', being selected from the frame by the analyst.

So if the subject were the cars on the side then you would be correct in saying that the HFOV does not change between shots (~15 feet).

However I find that all other things being equal, I tend to go with the guy dead-center conspicously holding the chart...

Although I must say I have lost no small amount of sleep wondering if Ethan's doppleganger were also present in the shot, where would the HFOV go?

C

-Actually I'm just assuming that the person in the shot is Ethan, but I don't really know :)

Hi everybody


I have some question, in your experiencie with security cameras, megapixels and all entails The cameras 1.3 MP, 3 MP, 5 MP and 10MP

Wich is the place apropriate for the cam of 10MP, 5 MP, 3MP and 1.3MP?

Who and where install the differents cameras?

I made a list of area that each camera can able of surveillance

MP Area

Camera 1.3 MP----- SUrveillance of personal without detail (regardless the face) For example in the oficce

Camera 3 MP-------- Surveillance of entry personal and vehicular (with details, faces, license plates )

Camera 5 MP-------- Surveillance of Boulevard and Intersection (brand of car, model, color)

Camera 10 ---------- Surveillance Freeway or higway (brand of car, model, color)

I wait your comments!

Miguel,

It would be useful to assign each of your categories a width of scene / FoV. I think that's what you are roughly doing but that would make it more precise.

For example, a 10 meter wide scene might be fine with 720P but a 30 meter wide scene might benefit from 5mp, etc.

Keep in mind, 5MP and 10MP, even with IR, have little benefit at night over 720p / 1080p and are typically worse in WDR scenes.

Hi John

the cameras of 5 and 10 MP wich is the environment perfect for give the maxim performance?

I want to think that this cameras is perfect install in a mall, supermarket is correct?

To maximize 5MP or 10MP cameras, place them indoors with even 24/7 lighting.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Axis ARTPEC-7 Chip Release Examined on Apr 08, 2019
For years, Axis essentially de-promoted their own chips. Now, they are reversing course. Axis has announced ARTPEC-7, their latest chip, which...
Startup Spectral Edge RGB+IR Claims "Unique Low Light Performance Tech" on Apr 03, 2019
This UK startup, born out of university research, is boldly proclaiming that they deliver "Unique low light performance tech for video surveillance...
Axis 5MP P Vs Q Camera Shootout (P3227-LVE vs Q3517-LVE) on Apr 02, 2019
While Axis' Q3517-LVE tested well, it is one of Axis' most expensive dome cameras, over $1,000 USD. Because of this, members asked us how it...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Pelco GFC 4K Dome Camera Tested (IMP831-1ERS) on Mar 12, 2019
Pelco has finally released their first 4K IP camera, after years of competitors' releases. Is this move too late? Or is their new GFC Professional...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
Bandwidth vs Low Light Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Geovision, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Feb 08, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance, but do all manufacturers' cameras perform the same? Are some more consistent...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
 Register for the Spring 2019 Access Control Course----Closed IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact