US House Passes FCC Ban Bill of Dahua / Hikvision, 420 - 4
The US House, by a 420 - 4 vote, passed a bill to "ensure" that the FCC "does not approve radio frequency devices that pose a national security risk", including Dahua and Hikvision. The next step is for the Senate to vote, where it is expected to pass.
Related, a US Congressman gave a speech on the House floor imploring for a "full stop to China from infiltrating our networks" in front of a poster labeling Hikvision and Dahua "Chinese Threats To Our National Security."
***** *** ***** **** **** ***** for ******************* **************, ****** **** ********************, ** ****** *** *** *** right ** "********* *** *********" ** doing **.
US ***** **** ******
*** *****'* ****, *** ****** ********* Act ** ****,******** * ***-* **** *********:
*** **** ********** *** ****'* ******** coverage**** ********** ** *** ***** *** Hikvision **** ********* *** *************.
Hikvision, ***** "******* ******* ** *** ******** ********"
** *** ***** *****, ***. ******* gave * ****** ** ***** ** a ****** ******** *********, *****, ******, ZTE, *** ****** "******* ******* ** Our ******** ********":
** *** ******, ******* **** *** Chinese ********* ***** "***** ****** ** exploit" ***** ********* "** *** *****" noting **** *** *** "****** ** wholly ***** ** *** ******* **********" with "**** ** *** ***." ** IPVM *** *******,********* ** *** ***** ******************** ** ******-***** ******** *** *** ******** ********"****** ****** *** *****".
*** **** ****** ** ****** *****:
**'** ****** ** * ****** ** telecommunications ****. *** **** ** *** another ******* ** ************* ***** *** I ****** ******** *** *** ****** to ******* *very ********* ****** ** ******** ********.
***** *******,my **** ** ***** *** *****, *** **** ** ******** *** ******* ********* ***** *** ******* ********* **** *** ** ***** ****** **** ************ *** ****************** ********, and stopping them from jeopardizing ******** ******** ******** *** *** ********* **** **** *** ********* **** ******.
** ****, *** ****** ********* ***,puts * **** **** ** ***** **** ************ *** ******** by prohibiting the FCC from issuing equipment licenses to Chinese telecommunications equipment companies that are identified as national security threats.
**** *********** ****** *** *** ********* work ** *** ****** *** ******** Committee, **** ** **** ******** ** a ********** ****** ** **** ** [House ****** *** ******** *********] ******** [Frank] ******* ********* ** *** ******** legislation **** **** ******* *** ****** of ***** ** ******* *** ****** and ******* ************** ******** *** ****** into ***.
*** ** *** ************ ** **** act ********** *** *** ** ******* a **** ** ****************** ********* ********* that *** ****** ** ** ******** security *******. ** ****, ******* **** year, *** *** ********* **** **** of ********* *** ** *** *** see, **** ********* ***** ** ** that ****.All ** ***** ********* *** ******* ********* **** *** ****** ****** ** ****** ***** ** *** ******* ********** *** *** **** **** ** *** ***.
***** *******, ** *** **** *** well **** *he *** ****** ** **** *** ** *********** ** ****** ******** *************** *** *** ** ********* *** ******** ********. ***** *** *** *** **** ******** ** ****, ***** *** ******* ********* *** ******* ** ******* ******** ******** ****. ** *** *****, *** *** ***** ****** ** ******* ***** ****** ********* *** ******* **** ** *** **** ***** ****** ** ******** ******** ** **** ******** ********* **** **** **** *********** ** **** ** ********* ********** ***********.
***** *** **** *** **** ***** strides ** ********* *** ****** ** China ** *** ********,US ******** *** ***** ********* ******** ********* **** ***** ****** ********* ** *** **** ******. *y prohibiting the FCC from issuing any equipment license to these companies that are listed as national security threats, our bill seeks to close the gap and existing law and slam the door on jeopardized Chinese equipment from threatening our American networks and from threatening the privacy and the data of American families.
***** *******, ***time *** ***** **** **** ******. It is important that this body do all it can to stop the undue and malign influences of the CCP from infiltrating our data and our telecommunications network. I urge all of my colleagues to support this bill and I reserve the balance of my time. [emphasis added]
"Sends * ****** ******"
******* ************ * ************* **** **** "***** * ****** signal ** *** ******* ********* ***** that ******* ** ********* ** ******** our ********":
** *********** *** *** **** ******* any ********* ******** ** ********* ********** as * ****** ** *** ******** security, **** **** ******** *********** ******* equipment **** *********** *******’* ********
*** ****** ********* ***sends * ****** ****** ** *** ******* ********* ***** **** ******* ** ********* ** ******** *** ******** and protecting the privacy and safety of our citizens. [emphasis added]
**-******* *** **** ***** (*-**)**** ** *** ************ *** "*******" *** **** "********* linked ** *** ******* **********, ******** the *************** ** *** ***************** ******* and *** *** *.*. ** ****":
*'** ****** *** **** * ****** to ******* *************** ** *** ****************** infrastructure **** ******** ****** *** ******** security. ********* **** ** ****** *** ZTE, ********* ****** ** *** ******* government, ******** *** *************** ** *** telecommunication ******* *** *** *** *.*. at ****. *'* ** ******* **** the ***** ****** **********, ********* *********** that ***. ******* *** * **-******** to ******** *** *** **** ******* licenses *** *** ****************** ********* **** by ****** ** ***
House **** ********
*** ********* *** *** "*** ***** **** 1 ****" ** *** ********* ************** from *** ******* *********.
*** **** ********* **** ** **** not ******* *** ************** "****** *** date" ** *** *********, *.*. ** revocations. *******, ** ****** *** *** the ***** ** "*********" *** "*********" of ******** "***" ************* *** "********" rules ***** **:
Next ****: ******
*** **** **** ** *** ********* ********* *** **** ** ** ***** on ** * **** *** *** disclosed. **-******** ******** ***** ***** (*-**) and ** ****** (*-**) ******* *** House ****'* ********* * ************ ***** *** ****** ** **** its *******:
"******* ********* **** **** ******* **** identified ** ******** ******** ******* ****** not ** ******* ** **** ** compromised ********* *** ********,” ***** ****. “Senator ****** *** * ******* *** House *** ******* *** ****** ********* Act -- ********** *********** **** ***** close **** ******** *** ******* ******** telecommunications ********. ***, ** **** ** the ****** ** ** *** **** and **** ** ******** ** *** president's ****."
“** *****’* ************ ********* *****, ** must ******* *** ********** **** *** values,” ****** ****. “****’* *** *** bipartisan *********** **** **** *********** ********* out ** *.*. ****************** ******** *** ensure *** ********** ** **** *** consumers *** ****** *** *** ****** States. *’* ***** ** ******* **** Senator ***** ** **** ******** *** I ***** *** ***** ** *************** for ********* *** ****. * *** call ** *** **** ****** ** swiftly **** *** ****** ********* *** and **** ** ** *** *********’* desk.”
FCC ************ "*******" ***** **** *******
*** ************ ******* ****, ********** *********** *** *** ***,********** ***** ****'* *******, ****** *** Senate ** **** ***** *** *******:
***** ********** ****** ********* *** ***** close * ******* ******** **** ****** and ****** *** ********** ***** ** place ***** ******** **** **** *** networks. * ******* ***** **** ** eliminate *** ******* ***** ** **** equipment, *** * ** ******* ** see **** ****** ********** ******* *** this *********** ******* *****’* ****. *** that **** ********* *********** *** ****** the *****,I **** ***** ************* ** *** *.*. ******. [emphasis added]
Impact: ******** *** *** ****
*** ******* ** **** *** ***** provide ***** ********** *********, *** *****, support ** ******'* ******** *******.
********* *** ******** ********** *** *** ban *** ******* ************* *******. ***** ******** ** *** ***, ********* **** ********' ******* **** alone "**** *** ******* * *****" for * ***, *** **** ******** "certainly *** *** **********" *** *** to *** ***** *******:
*********,*****'* *** ************** **** ************* ********** **** ******* to **** ***** "***** ******* ***** were ***** **** ******** ** ********** to ******* ******* ********* ** ********". Hikvision **** ********** *** *** ***'* alleged "*********—****** **** ******* ******** ********—**********".
Update (**/**/**): The Senate is expected to vote on the Secure Equipment Act within 2 weeks due to strong bipartisan support, according to individuals with knowledge of the matter. The Senate Commerce Committee is seeking to fast-track official approval after verbally agreeing to the House version of the bill.
Update (**/**/**): Today, Hikvision notified partners that this bill passed the house. The bulletin misleadingly says “Even though the House has acted, nothing requires the Senate to act,” suggesting the Senate could ignore the legislation. This is highly unlikely for a bill that passed the House with bipartisan, near-unanimous support.
****** *** ***** **** *** ** worse *** ********* *** *****, ** would ** ****** ******* ** ** to (** **** **) ****** *******, IMO. * ******* ** *** **** a *** ** * ******** ******* built ** *** *** ******* ** milk *** **** *** ****** ********** it ***** ** * **** *** to **** **** ******* ** ******** for **** ****.
* ******* ** *** **** * bit ** * ******** ******* ***** up *** *** ******* ** **** one **** *** ****** **********
*******:"** *** *** ***** ********" **** Hikvision *** ******* ******* ********
*** **** ****, ** *********, ** advertising "******** ******** ****" *** * territory ******* ********.
** ***, ** ***** **** ** bitter *****-************, *** **** ***** *** country *** ***** ** ** *** Hikua?
*** :)
******* *** ******** ** ***** * & ***** ** ***** ********* ********** need ** ** ******* ********
** ****** *** - *, * don't ***** ***** ** *** **** to ***** **** * *** ****** who ***** ******* **. *** ****'** very **** ***** ** ***-********** ******* for ***** ****** ** **** ******* it.
* ** **** ********** ** *** what ***** *********** *** ****** *****? Anyone **** *** *****?
*****, ***** ** **** ***** ******* it ******* ** **** *** ** far ******...
******* *** ******** ** ***** * & ***** ** ***** ********* ********** need ** ** ******* ********
****** **** * *** *** ******** ********* ** **-******** **********.
*** **** ******* ** ***** ********* :)
**** *** ** **** *******. ********* are * *** **** ** *** problem. *** *******. *** ***** **** government ****** ** ****** **** *** people **** *********, *** *** ********* the ********* *** ** ********* ***** interests
***'* *****, **** **** ******** **** a *** ****** **** ***. **** if *** *** **'* ** ***** a ********* ******* ****? **** *** customer ****? * ****** *** **** would ** ***** ****
**** **** ** *****! ** ***'* see *** ******** ** *** ** the ******* ********* ********* ******* **** changing ***** **** ** *********** ** would ***** ***** *******.
***** **** **** **** *** ***** “Hikua” ** “********” **** **** ******* into *** ******* ********?
******* ** *** ***** **** *********** it **** *** ******** ** ***** ago? *** ***** **** ****** ***** to ******!
*** *** ******, * **** ** with ******** **** *****! ****** **** anyways.
**** *** ** ** ****** ** and *** **** ** ********* ****** for *********! :*
** *** **** **** **** ***?
*** **** ****** ******** *****?
*** *** **** ****** *** ******* is ******** ******?
**...******** ******** ** *** ***** *** the ******. *** ***** *** ******* voted. ** ** ******* ** *** report, *** **** **** ** *** Senate ******. ** ***'* **** **** exactly **** **** ** *** *** trying ** ****** ****.
*** ***** * ***** *** ***** the ******* ** ************* *********** *** authorizations. ** ******* / ***** ** that *** ** ********** / *** will ********* ******** ************** **** *** covered ******* ***** ***** ***** **, 2021, *.*., * ****** ***. ** theory ****** **** ** ********* **, **** ** *** **** when *** *** ********** ******** ***** companies, ********* ***** *** ********* ** be "****** ** **** ** ************ risk ** *** ******** ******** ** the ****** ******". **** ***** *** straightforward ******* ** ******* ***** ************** to ** ****.
******* *** ****** ** *-** **** old ********* (******* *** ****) ** retain ***** *******. * ***** **** with **** ** ** ***** **** us **** ** ********* *** ********* without ******* ** **** *** ******* and ** ******** ***** ** ********* mandate.
* ********** *** **** ***** **** the ******** ********* ***, * ***** do *** **** ** ***** **** the **** ********* ***. **** ***** there *** **** ***** **** **** which * ******** *** ***** ******* compliance.
**** **** *********** ************ ******* ********* manufactured ** ** ** ** **** on ********* ******* ********* ** *******?
**** **** ** ******* ******** ******* from ********* ** *******?
** ** **** ** ********* ******* hakvision ** *******?
** *** *** ********* ****** **** any ** *********** ** ******* ********* such ** ***** ** ********* ** limited ** **** ***** ******* *********. I ***'* *** **** ** ***** a ********* ********** ** *** **** any *** **** ********* ***** *** to *******.
**** * *******... *** *******'* ** have * **** *** ***** ********* sourced *******/************* ** ****?
******: *** ****** ** ******** ** vote ** *** ****** ********* *** within * ***** *** ** ****** bipartisan *******, ********* ** *********** **** knowledge ** *** ******. *** ****** Commerce ********* ** ******* ** ****-***** official ******** ***** ******** ******** ** the ***** ******* ** *** ****.
* **** *** **** ******** ** the ****** **** **** **** *** down *** *** *********, *** ** a *********** ** ***** ** ***** whenever *** ********** ***** ** *** says: “*** ****** *** ****, **’* for **** *** ****.”
** *****’* *** **** **** **.
** ********* *** ***** *** ***** companies **** **** ** *** ******* government **** *** *** **** ****** decide ****. **** ** ** ** years ***** ***** ****** * ******** dictatorship (***** ******** **** ****-****), *** we ***** ** *** ****** *** Digital ******** ***?
******: **** ******* *** **** ***** to *** *** **********:** * *********** ** ***** ** Pause ******** *** ********** ***** ** And ****: “*** ****** *** ****, It’S *** **** *** ****.”
** ********* *** ***** *** ***** companies **** **** ** *** ******* government **** *** *** **** ****** decide ****.
*** **** *** ****** ****** **** both ** ***** ********* **** ****** cyber ******** ******, ***** ***** ******? Doesn't *** ****** **** ******** *********** to **** ***** *********? **** ****** happen ** ********* **** ************ *** out ********* *** ***** ********** ** their ********?
*****,
**** ** * ***** ****** ** information ** ***** ******. * ***** John **** *********** *** *** ***** alike ** * ***** ******** ** make *** ********** ******** ** ******* they **** ** *** ** **** these *********.
*** **** *** ********** ***** ** and ******* *** **, * ******** with. ******** ******* *** ** ** an ********** ** *** ************** ** a **** ****** *** **** ****** to **** ******.
*** ******* *** **********'* ******* ** to ****** ****** ** ****** ** the ******. ** ** *** ****** point ****** ****** * ************ *********. What *** *** ******* *** ** literally *******.
************, *** *** ********** **** ***** against *** **** ** * ***********, Rep. ****** ******.
**** **** ** *** ***** ********, it’s ***** ******* *** *******.
** *******, *** * ********* **** won’t ****** ******** ******** ******* **** US ***** ****** ******** ***’* ******* with *** ********* **** **!
*** ***** **** ***’* **** ***** NSL’s, ***** *** *** ****** ********** methods **** ****** ********* ** ****** back ***** *** ******* **** ** their ******. ********* **** ******* **** can’t ******* ******* ** ****** *** requirements *** *** **** ******** **** they **** ******** **** ** **** for!
**** ***** **** *** ** *** can (*** *** ******* ********* ** files ****** ** *******) *** **/******* it’s *** ******** **** ******* ***** and *********.
* ***’* *** *** **** ******** the ******** ** *** ******** ********!
***’** *** **** ********* ** ****** but ** ***** **** ***** ** those ******** *****-********* ** **** *****…
***** ** ** ******** **** ******** products **** **** **** *** ***** sponsored ***** ******* (****** ***** **** have) *** ***** ** ********* *** insecurely ******** ******** ** **** (*** any ***** *** **** ******) ** do **.
**’* **** ****** *** ************* ****** person (*** ****** ***** * *****, stripy *** *** ***** ***** **** a ******* ** ******) **** *** much ****** ** **’** ***** ** ban ******.
** ******* * ** ** ******* teenage ******** **** **** * ****** student **** * ***, ** **’** going ** **** *** *** *** hands ** ******* ********!
****** ***** **** *** ********** **** I **** ******* ****** ********** ** voting
****** ***** **** *** ********** **** I **** ******* ****** ********** ** voting
* ***** * *** **, ***’** saying ******* *** *** ******* ***/**** spy ** **, ** ****** *** mind ** ***** ***/**** *** ** us.
********?
* ***** * *** **, ***’** saying ******* *** *** ******* ***/**** spy ** **, ** ****** *** mind ** ***** ***/**** *** ** us.
****, *’* ****** **** *** **’* easier **** **** *** *** ** Gov ** *** ** ******** ********. Their ****** ******** ******** **** *** increasingly **** ******* **** **** ** the ******* ******* ** *********** **** do *** ****** ** ** *** requirements **********.
* ** **** **** **** ******** citizens **** ***** ***** *** ********** spying ** ****, ***** *** **** wrote ** **** *** ************!
****, *’* ****** **** *** **’* easier **** **** *** *** ** Gov ** *** ** ******** ********.
**, ***’* *** ***’** *****. **** does **** **** ** ** **** the ********** ****?
******* ** *** ****** ****** **** discussing *********.
* ***** **** **** **** *** NIST ****** ** (*** ****) ****** number ********* ** ******* *** ******** curve ******, *** *** *** **** successfully ******** ***** ‘***** ****’ ****** by ******** *** **** ** ******** that **** ****** ****** ****** ** do ***** *******.
**’* * *** *** *** ************ and **** ******.
* ***** **** **** **** *** NIST ****** ** (*** ****) ****** number ********* ** ******* *** ******** curve ******…
* ***** *** ********** ***** **** a **** **** ****** ****** ********* :)
** *******, *** * ********* **** won’t ****** ******** ******** ******* **** US ***** ****** ******** ***’* ******* with *** ********* **** **!
***** ** **** ******** *** ****? I've ***** ***** **** *****. ** be *****, * ** ***** ** what ***** **, *** *'** *** **** ****** claiming **** ******** ***** ************ ************* do ** ** *** "******" ****. Can *** ************ **** ***** **** a ********?
@**** *******
** *** ****** ***** **** ******** would ******* **** ***** ******** ** the ** *** ** ***** ********?
**** ** **** **** ****** ****** to ***, *’* ********** ******* **** the ****** ***** **!
*** *** *** ********* ** ****** or **** ** *** **** ** have *** ******** ** ***.
* **** ** *** ************ *** has ******** *** *** **** ******* at ** ********** *** ******** ** to ** * ****… ***** *** hundreds ** ***-***********-*******-***-*-***-*** *** *** ** in * ******** ** ******* *** the ******.
* **** ** *** ************ *** has ******** *** *** **** ******* at ** ********** *** ******** ** to ** * ****…
*** **** **** **** ****** ********? You **** ******** *** ************?
**** ******* *** **** ***********. *** do **** **********. *** *******, ********** *** ********* ********** ******, **** *** ********:
*******, *** ***** **** ******* ****** the ** ************ **** ******* *** been ******* **** *** ******* *****. I’m ***** ********* *** ** ** case **’* ****** *********! * ******* that **** ***** ***** *** ********* them ** ****** **** ** **** have **** *********** **** *** ‘**************’ internet ******* ***! **** *** *** any ******** ** ***** **** *** supply ** ** ***?
*** ** *** *** ****. ** it ** *** ** ** *** that ******* **** ** **** ******** very ******** **** *** **** *********** for*** ******** / ****** ** ******* Whale?
*** ****** *** ***** **********, *** the ******, * **** *** ***** up *** * ** *** ******* nor **** * **** *** ******** that *** **** ******** ** *** way ** *** ******* ***** *******.
**** * ** ****** ** ********** is **** *** ***** *** *** grounds *** *** ** **** *********** against ******?
**'* *** ***** *** *** ** say "*** ** ** * ******** country", **** ****'* *******, ** *** you ** **** **** ******** ***** with ******** (*.*., **** ********). **'* another ***** ** ******* **** "* companies **** ***’* ****** ******** ******** Letters **** ** ***** ****** ********" and **** ******* **** ******** *** your ********* **********.
** *** *** *** ***** ****?
***** *** ******** ** ***-***********-*******-***-*-***-*** *** may ** ** * ******** ** confirm *** *** ******.
***** *** ****:
Share * ***
** *** **** ***** ********* **** IPVM ****** ***********? ** **** ** hear **** ***.******* ** ** ***** * ***.
Share * ***
** *** **** ***** ********* **** IPVM ****** ***********? ** **** ** hear **** ***.******* ** ** ***** * ***.
***** ****, ********** **’* *********** - according ** ****!
*** ***'** ******** *** ** *********** nation *******? *'* ******* ******** *** I ***'* **** ******** **** **** components ******** ** *** ******* **********'* state-run ********** ********* ************ ** ****** of ***** ** *****. **** ***'* racism ** * ****** ********.
*** *** *** *** ** *** own ****** **** **** ** ****. Edward ******* *** ****** ****. * approve ** *** *******, *** * don't ***** *** *********** *** **** big ** * ****. **** ** a ********* ****** ** *** **** of ************ *********. **** ***** ** be ***** ** *** *********** ******* the *** ***** **** *** *****. With *** ***, *** ******** ** privacy ********* *****'* *** **** ******* your **** ****** *** *********** *** government.
** *****, **** ** ** ******** different ******. ***** ***** ****** ****** are ****** *** ******* ******* ***** OWN ******. *** *********** ** **** speech ** ****.
**** ****** ** **** ** ***** equivalencies.
** ** ******* * ***** **** been *******.
****** ***** ** **** ** ***
”* **** ** *** ************ *** believed **** **** ******** *** *** they ******* ** ** ********** *** believed ** ** ** * ****…”
*** *** ******, **** *** ******* 5 *** * ***** ***. * no ****** **** ** **** *** affiliation ** **** *******.
*** * *** ** ***** ** the *** (********) ***** ******** * logo **** (* *****) *** **** court. ** ****** **** **** ** me.
******, *** ***** *** ** ***** verifying ** *** ****’* ******** ** be ****** *** *** ********** *****? Do *** **** ** *** ***** House *** *** “*** *** ***’* know ** *** *** * ***** directly **** ********* ***** ***** ** NSL **** *** ******** ******** ** the ******* * ****[**] *** ******* they ********?”
**’* *** * ******* ** ******* that * ******* **** *** ******** have ********* ** “*** ***** *** controlled ** *** ***” ***** ****** with * ******* **** *** ** Gov?
*’* ********** ** ******* ****’* ****** in ********. ***** *** ** *******
**’* *** * ******* ** ******* that * ******* **** *** ******** have ********* ** “*** ***** *** controlled ** *** ***” ***** ****** with * ******* **** *** ** Gov?
**'* **** ** *** *** "*******" it, ****'* **** *** *** *******. You ******* ** ** * ****** fact.
** ** **** ********:
*** *** ******, **** *** ******* 5 *** * ***** ***. * no ****** **** ** **** *** affiliation ** **** *******.
*** * *** ** ***** ** the *** (********) ***** ******** * logo **** (* *****) *** **** court. ** ****** **** **** ** me.
**, ******** ******* **** *** ****, when ***** *** ********* *** **** little ******** ******** *** **** *********** unknown ** *** ** **********, **** received **** * ****** *** **** they ******* ** ***** ** **** you, * ****** *** **** *** work **** ***** *** ********* *** is *** ** *** **? ** I ********** **** *********?
** ****, *** ***’* ********** ** correctly…
*** *********** ***** ** ** ******** the *** * **** ********, ** I ***… *** *** ****** ** for *** ** *** *****, *** not ****.
* *** **** *** *** ** the ****** *********, *** * ** not ***. **** *** *** ***** were **** ***** ** ** ********. The ***** *** ****** ** ** internal ****** ***** **** ********* ******* from ******* ********* ********* *** ***, UK *** *******. *’* ****** ***** but * ***’* **** ** ***** archive **** ** *** **** ***** from * ****** ***** *’* ** longer **** ** **** ***** ***! If *’* **** ***** **** ** would **** **** ********* *-* ***** later, **** *’* ******** **** ****** shot **!
** ********** ***** ** ***** **** year… *** *** **** ****** **** - **** **** *’* ***** ** get * ****** ** ***** **!
****** **** **, ***’** ******** **** off ***** *** *** ***
***** ******** ** **:
Update (**/**/**): The Senate is expected to vote on the Secure Equipment Act within 2 weeks due to strong bipartisan support, according to individuals with knowledge of the matter. The Senate Commerce Committee is seeking to fast-track official approval after verbally agreeing to the House version of the bill.
** ***** ** ****** ** *** 10/8/21 ******?
**** *** ****** * **** ***, so ** ****** ***.
Update (**/**/**): *****, ********* ******** ******** **** this **** ****** *** *****. *** bulletin ************ **** “**** ****** *** House *** *****, ******* ******** *** Senate ** ***,” ********** *** ****** could ****** *** ***********. **** ** highly ******** *** * **** **** passed *** ***** **** **********, ****-********* support.
**** *** ******* *** ** **** regard ******* ******** ** ** ******* my ****** **** ****, *** ** is ***** ** ******.
***** ******* ******* ** *** ** the ****???
******** ******** ******* *** ********* ***** US **** **** - ******* - Security - ******
*******, **** *********!
*******,********* *** ** ******:
** *** *** ****, ** ** to******* *** **+ *** ******** **** going ** ******. ** *** ***** ****, **'* a **** ************* **** *** ** government ** ****** ** *********** **** Hikvision **** *** ** ***** ********* is ******* ******.
****, ********* *** ********* ** **** its ***** ** ***:
**'* * **** ***** *** **** not **** *** **** (****, **** of, * *****).