Hide or Show Models on Quotes - Integrator Statistics

By: Brian Karas, Published on Apr 13, 2017

Customers like to know what they are buying, but they might use an integrator's detailed quote to shop the system designed. This is a challenge faced by integrators everywhere, and there are strong opinions on the best approach.

New survey results with 160 integrator responses showed them to be sharply divided. In this report, we break down the statistics, plus examining the main reasons for and against with detailed integrator commentary.

********* **** ** **** what **** *** ******, but **** ***** *** an **********'* ******** ***** ** shop *** ****** ********. This ** * ********* faced ** *********** **********, and ***** *** ****** opinions ** *** **** approach.

*** ****** ******* **** 160 ********** ********* ****** them ** ** ******* divided. ** **** ******, we ***** **** *** statistics, **** ********* *** main ******* *** *** against **** ******** ********** commentary.

[***************]

Divided ***********

****** **** ** *** responses **** **** **** specific ***** ** **** numbers ** ******, *** another **% **** **** list ******** ***** ******* in ******** *****. 

 

******* *** **** ******** are ******** *****.

Yes - *** ******** ********* / ************

**** *********** **** **** provided ******** ****** ** a ****** ** ******** integrity, *** **** ********* should ** ***** **** information ** ***** **** to **** ** ******** decision:

  • "********** - ** ******* in **** ************ ** the ******** *** *** everything **'** ******* *** compare ** ******* ** what ****'** ************* **** buying. ** *** **'** often ***** ****** ** displace ******* ******."
  • "** ** ********* **** specific **** ******* ** we **** ** ** as ******* **** *** customer ** ********. **** know ******* **** ****'** getting **** **** ****** our ***** ** ******* to *** ***** ******* who ***** * *** quantity ** "** *******" on ***** ******."
  • "** ** **** **** of *** *********. * want ******* *** ************ for *** *********. **** should ** ******* ** compare. ** **** *** going ** **** ** up **** * *** bucks ** * ******, they *** ****** *** a ******** ** **** anyway. **** ****** **** understand **** ****** **** can **** ********** *******."
  • "***, ** ****** ** be ******* *** ** know *** ******* ****** the ***** ******* *** get ****** *******. ** what ** **** **** what *** *** ** for, ** **** **** to *** ** ********** fine, *** ****.. *** when ** ****** **** or **** **** ****** you *** ** ***** deny ************** *** *** cameras... **** **** **** will *** **** *** because *** ******* **** products (********* *** **!)"
  • "** ******* ***** & models, ******* ***** (** PoE *.*** *-*** *********, etc.) *** ********* ** the **** ** ***** or *** ** *** include ****** **** *******. Despite *** ******* ****** customers "******** *** *****" there ** ** ********* factor **** ***** **** play, *** ** ***** by *** *******."
  • "***. ** **** ** be *********** ******* **'* important *** ** ** have *** ******** ********** what **** *** *******. And ** ***** ** differentiate ********* **** ***** companies. ******* ** *** not ******* '**** ****'* specials' ** **'* ****** for ** ** ******** that ***********."
  • "***, ** ****** ******* model, *** ************, **** in ***** ***** **** you **** ***** *** single ***** *** ***** solution."
  • "***. ******* ** ******* we *** *** *** customers ** ***** *** have ******* ** **** or ****, ** *** not *****-********. *******, ** we **** **** ** are ******* **** * shady ******** ** **** change **** *******."
  • "*** * **** *** Mfg *** **** #. I **** ** ******* a ******** ********, ** must ** ***********. * am *** **** ** fool *** ******. * believe ** ** ********* the ****** ** **** of *** ***** *******. An ******** ****** ** less ******* ** *** end ** *** *******. The *** ******* **** has **** *********** *** talked ***** ****** *** sale *** ************."

Yes - **** *****

********* ******* ****** *** customer ** ****** ********** the ********, *** *********** compare ** ** ***** alternatives. *********** *** **** more ** * "***** selling" ******** **** **** listing *******, *** ********** why **** ***** ******** components ****** **** ***** expertise.   

  • "** **, ** ****** our ******* ** **** exactly **** ** *** proposing ** **** **** want ** **** ** up *** ** ***** own ********."
  • "**** ** *** ****. We ****** *** *********** that *** ******* *** commoditized *** **** ** issue ******* *** ******** know **** ***** ** more ** *** ******** then **** *** ********."
  • "** ** **** * specific **** ****** ** well ** * *********** of *** ****. ***** were ***** **** ** first *** ******* **** we ****'*, *** * like ** **** * point **** ** *** more *********** **** **** security ********* ** *** design, *******, *** ************ procedures ** *** ********* so **** ***** **** the *********. ***** ** the ****** ** ***** designs **** **** "********" though, **** *** *** be * ******** ** continue ** *******."
  • "***, **** ********* **** to **** ** *** spec ****** *** **** what **** *** *******. And **** ** **** fulfill ********* ************."
  • "****** **** ******** ** clients **** ******* **** we *** ********."
  • "***, *** ****** *** detailed. ** **** ** show *** ********* **** they *** ******* ** there *** **** ** any ****** **** **** up ** ******** ** installs. ****, ** ***** is ******* ******* **** is ************* ******* **** our *****, *** *** other ******* **** *** have ******* ** ****, we *** ******* ****** the ******** ** *** those ******* ***** **** shows *** *** ****** the ***** ******* *** missed ** *** **** out."
  • "** ******* *** ** our ********* ** **** the ***** *** ********** of * ******. ****, for ********* ****** ** apples ** *** ******* the ****** **** **** better *******/********/******* *** ** is **** ** ******* it ** *** **** have *** **** **** - ******** ****** - $100,000"
  • "***. ** ***** ******** to ********** *** ******'* benefits, *** ***** *** project ******* *** *********** to ********** **** *** been ********. * **** some ****** *** ******** about *** *** **** shopping ** *** ********. I ***'* **** *** you'd ***** ***** ****. If **** ** **** to ***, *** **** to ****** ******* **** on **** ***** ** walk ****. ** ******** that **** ***** ** being *** *** ******** BEFORE *** **** * contract."
  • "***, ** ****** **** the ******** * ******** list **** *** **** numbers. ** ******* **** with ********* ******** *** best ******** *** ***** needs, ** ** **** like **** ** ******* understand **** ** **** they *** ******."
  • "*** *** * **** sure * **** *** ****** that ******* *** *** the **** **** ** they **** *** **** (OEM *****).* **** ******* issues **** ******* ** OEM ** **** ****** cameras." 

Yes *** **** ********** ********

******* ***** ******, ** products **** * ********** sales *******, ***** *********** to **** ******* **** less ******* *** *** customer ******* *** ******** out ** ******* ** prices ******:

  • "** ******* ** *** higher *** ****** ***** we *** ** ******** dealer. *** ***** *** quotes ** ******* **** specify ******* *****."
  • "***. ** ** *** an ***** *** **** and ******** ****."
  • "** *** ************ "******", which ** * ***** OEM *** **** ***** part *******, ** **** are ********* **** **** us ** **** ******** in *******."
  • "***, ** ******* ****** our *** ******* *** subsequently **** *** *** model *******, ** * have ** ******* ******* them ** ******. ****** we *** *** *** them ** ******* ****** would *** ****, ***, or ******** ** ****** for * **** ***** price."

No - ****** ********

******* **** ********* ******** quotes ****** ** ** other *********** *** *** primary ****** *********** **** for *** ******* ********* on *********.

  • "**. ****** **** **** take *** ***** *** go *** ***** **** on ******/****."
  • "**, ** ** *** want *** ******** ** shop ****** ***** *******."
  • "** - ** ******* shopping. **** ****** ********* products *** ** ******* online ******* ************ *******."
  • "******* ** ***'* ******* part ******* **** ********* as *** ****** *** easily ******* ***** ** want ** **** **** markup ** *** ********."
  • "** ***'* **** ***** numbers ** **** *******, but ** ** ********* the ***** *** **** description ** *** *******. A ***** ****** ****** be **** ** ****** out ** **** *** description ** **** ****** to."
  • "** * ** *** list ******** ***** *******. Why? **** * **** publish *** ****** ** the **** ** ****** can ****** **** *** replicate? ******* ******** **** numbers ** **** ** invitation *** ****** ** shop **** ***** ***/** complain **** **** *** buy *** ****** ******* from **** ******* *** site."
  • "**. ** *** * lot ** ****** **** into ********* *** ***'* want ** ** **** into * ******** ****."

No - ******* ***********

******* ************ **** ******** to ******* **** *********** in **** * ******* was *********** ** ************ time, ** ** **** a ***** ***** ** came *** *** * reason *** ******* ** concerns **** *****-********.

  • "**, ******* ****** (****, stock ***) ****** ** a ***** **** **** its ****** ** ****** to * ********* *******, too **** *********** **** to *** ***** ******* etc ** ********* *** good ** **** ** the ******** ** *** quoting *****."
  • "** ** **** *** product ** *** ********* or ****-******* ** **** of *******."
  • "** ** ********* **** latest *** ********."
  • "** ******* **** ****** so ******* ** **** as *** **** **** the ******** ***** **** "shop ******" ** **** have **** ***********."
  • "**, ****** ****** **********, we **** ****** *** best ****** *** *** camera ** *** **** of *******"
  • "*** *******. * ***'* **** to **** ****** * free ****** ** *** to ****** * ****** and **** ***** **** numbers *** ****** ******** will ****** **** ***** time ** ****** ** time...some ******** **** * year ** **** ** get ********."

Situation *********

* ***** ** *********** responded **** **** **** provide ******* ** ******** instances. **** ***** ** for ******** ********* **. proposals ** *** *********, or ******* ** ******** customer ************ ** **** detailed ******.

  • "**** ********* ******* ******** and ** ****** **** them. **** ********* *** ok **** ** ******* project ****."
  • "******* ** *** *********. If **'* * ******* customer, **'** **** *** whatever **** *** ***: part #, **** *******, etc. ** **'* * random **** **** ******* to **** *** ***** against *** ***** ***** slammer, **'** ******* ** much *********** ** ********, sometimes ** *** ***** of ********** ******* **** the ******** ******* ****** than **** ********* *** sheets."
  • "******* ** *** ******** and ********. **** ** list ************ *** ***** and **** ** **** general ***** ** ** know **** **** *** just ******** *****."
  • "********* ** *** ********. If **** ***'* ******* part *******, ** **** to **** ******* ************ that *** ******** *** understand."
  • "******* - ********** ********, yes. ********** ******** - 50/50. ** **** ***** list *** ***** ** we *** ***** * higher *** ****** ** the ******** ** ********* more **** * *** vs * ***. ** gives ** *** *********** to **** ******* *** usefulness **** *** **** of *** ******. ** we *** ******* ***** end ******* ***** *** race ** *** ****** is *** *****, ** don't ******* *****. ****** because ** *** ******* something ******* ** ** is ********* **** ** win."
  • "********* ** ***** **** in ***** ** ******** customer ********. *** ******** customers *** ***'* **** us, ** **** ******** the *****."
  • "** **'* * ****** bid ******* ** ** not *** **** *******. Make **** **** *** it. ** **'* * sold *** **** ** provide **** *******."
  • "****** ** ********. **** customers **** ** *** this. ****** ***'*. ** often ** ** *********** situations ** *********** **** we *** ***** ******* products."
  • "*** *******, ****** ***** is * ******** ****** to. ***** ******* ***** include *********** **** **** the ************ ** *** design/problem ******* ******* ** if *** ******** **** is * ****** *** to ***** *** ******* at ****."

Summary ********

**** ** *** *********** in ******** ****** **. not **** **** ** how *********** ******** ***** market. ***** ********* *** business ***** ** *** value ***** ******* ******** often ***** ** ******* full **************, **** *** mindset **** ** ******** customer **** **** *** a ****** ******* ************, and ***** **** ** price ***** **** *** worth ** *******. *********** selling ***** ** ***-**** had **** ****** ** reduce ******** ******* **** customers ***** *** ** try *** **** ** even ****** ***** *********, leaving **** **** ** the ******** ** *** hopes ** ****** ** more ********* *** **** to **** *** *********** prices.

Comments (9)

The comment that asked the question "does a chef publish his recipe" is a good analogy in an indirect way. This would be from higher end, considered quality restaurants. But the great majority of dining is at cheap and fast food places. There's money to be made at both. The question is, do you want to a short order cook business, or a Chef busines?

I think a more accurate analogy from the end user's perspective is "Does the menu list the main components of the dish? Would you purchase a "chef's special" pizza without knowing what's on it? We don't need to know the chef's recipe nor how it's made, but we want to know the major components of the product we're purchasing.

As an end user, I will not accept any quote that doesn't list the major components of the product/system I'm purchasing by line item, and with totals broken out by parts, labor, shipping/freight, and tax.

Ditto.  If this is too much to ask of you there are plenty of other good, reputable companies that are more than happy to do it.

I think a more accurate analogy from the end user's perspective is "Does the menu list the main components of the dish? .....We don't need to know the chef's recipe nor how it's made, but we want to know the major components of the product we're purchasing.

...

Hence, why I said not publishing the recipe, and did not say anything about not publishing the ingredients.

 

Well, you can take comparisons down to the granular level, but the question was whether to provide models on quotes, and the bottom line is that I do require it as an end user.

I treat people the way I want to be treated.  If I'm buying something like a car, a computer, a new television, a refrigerator, etc., I want to know the details, such as the make, model, performance reviews, etc.  I want the best price too, but don't want to deal with a "questionable" vendor.   I want to compare quotes and, yes, "shop" for the best deal. 

So, what is it about the surveillance industry that makes some integrators think their clients shouldn't know what they're getting until they are locked into an agreement?  If a client wants to use my quote, with all the makes and model numbers, to either DIY or leverage a price with another company, that's fine. I'm not trying to win a bid based solely on the parts.

I'm always curious when the word bid is used, how often it is really a bid. I have been asked to "bid" on a sound system against someone else after I had already given a recommended proposal based on what the needs were. Since they said bid, I asked for the design to bid on. The only thing they gave me was a parts list. With that part list, I could assume a horrible design that wouldn't make the system any easier to use and it wouldn't make it sound any better. The goal of the renovation was to make the system easier to use. I ended up telling the client that I wouldn't provide a quote on an equipment list. After that I still ran sound for certain events and a few years later, I renovated the sound system. However, there was great compromise with this, as they wanted to scale back from my original design to fit a smaller budget. There was a compromise to ease of use, but due to waiting, newer products were available that fit the design fairly well.

A bid usually implies a design. The design is typically paid for by the client to a consultant that doesn't sell anything. That design is then bid on. Many clients don't realize this and will simply ask for a bid when they are really looking for  2-3 different proposals that often can't be compared with each other even if product numbers are listed. So in the end, the client ends up getting free design work without the use of a consultant. Often we are doing design/build and the only way the built-in design gets paid for is when you get the job. The client also must determine from those proposals what system is the best based hopefully on education of some sort. However, this choice often times is simply based on price alone. This is why there is so much work in fixing other companies messes and making a poor install into a proper one or a functional one. 

I try to educate the client as much as possible into what they are getting with a system as well as what they may not be getting. An example we all know is the typical 4K camera isn't going to have that 4K quality at night, especially with poor lighting. Providing proper education and actually helping the client goes a long way.

surely the client would be better served with giving him the features of a particular camera and why the camera has been selected.in this instance the more professional integrator should get job. by features I mean IR or dark fighter, lens choice,f no etc.etc. AND WHY YOU PROPOSE THE CAMERA AND RECORDING DEVISE.

Manfred, you make a good point and simply listing the features may be ample for some or most end users. In my case, though, I do compare the differences in the SAME features across models. For example, some cameras simply have better smart CODEC than others, and some are better than others in specific environments. Some have better low light capabilities than others, and so on.

And, if you tell me that a camera has WDR, I'll want to know whether it is digital WDR or true WDR.

I do read the cut sheets of cameras that are proposed to me and read the IPVM analyses of the same cameras. I couldn't do that without the model numbers. Granted, not everybody looks at that level of detail, but we should have the option.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,307 reports, 842 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Security Sales Course January 2020 - Last Chance on Jan 02, 2020
Notice: This is the last chance to register for the course. This sales course is customized for the current needs and challenges specific to...
Top Ways Security Integrators Improve Their Careers on Sep 03, 2019
With DIY products expanding and the future of integration debated, how do integrators stay sharp so they are not left behind? 180+ integrators...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
Indonesia Security Association Chairman Interview on Aug 01, 2019
Indonesia is a huge country with a population close to the US and a fast-growing economy. Its security industry is also growing rapidly but faces...
Online Video Surveillance Sales Comparison - Amazon, B&H, CDW, LTS, Super Circuits, More on Jul 31, 2019
IPVM has uncovered the key trends and top options being offered across commonly used surveillance sellers. How has the market shifted since we...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Security Dealer 'Social Media Contractor' Program on Jun 25, 2019
A $20,000 video surveillance system can be yours for free if you are willing to post on social media about the security dealer. Good deal, bad...
Axis Will Not Block Resellers on Jun 10, 2019
While Axis generally has strong favorability amongst integrators, the biggest complaint is their channel model, which results in smaller integrator...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...

Most Recent Industry Reports

JCI / Tyco Security Products Layoffs on Jun 05, 2020
Johnson Controls / Tyco Security Products has confirmed COVID-19 related layoffs, expanding upon the April coronavirus cuts the company previously...
EyePark Presents Mobile Driver Authentication on Jun 05, 2020
EyePark presented its long-range QR code parking verification platform at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from EyePark...
Bleenco "Under The Tongue" Temperature Detection Examined on Jun 05, 2020
"Say aah", says Bleenco, a PPE detection video analytics company, offering a different method for measuring body temperature with a thermal...
Hikvision and Uniview Entry Level Thermal Handheld Cameras Tested on Jun 05, 2020
While most screening systems cost $10,000 or more, manufacturers such as Hikvision and Uniview have now released handheld models for $1,000 or...
Sequr Presents HID based Cloud Access Control on Jun 04, 2020
Sequr presented HID based Cloud Access Control at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video from Sequr...
VergeSense Presents People Tracking Sensor on Jun 04, 2020
VergeSense presented its people tracking sensor and social distancing insights at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from...
FLIR A Series Temperature Screening Cameras Tested on Jun 04, 2020
FLIR is one of the biggest names in thermal and one of the most conservative. While rivals have marketed fever detection, FLIR has stuck to EST...
"Fever Camera" Show On-Demand Watch Now on Jun 03, 2020
IPVM has successfully completed the world's first "Fever Camera" show. Recordings from both days are posted at the end of this report for on-demand...
Cobalt Robotics Presents Indoor Security and Access Robots on Jun 03, 2020
Cobalt Robotics presented indoor security robots at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video from Cobalt...
Dahua Sues Ex-North American President, Says Legal Typo on Jun 03, 2020
Dahua's former North American President Frank Zhang claims he is owed almost $11 million but Dahua counter claims it is just a "scrivener's error",...