Hide or Show Models on Quotes - Integrator Statistics

By: Brian Karas, Published on Apr 13, 2017

Customers like to know what they are buying, but they might use an integrator's detailed quote to shop the system designed. This is a challenge faced by integrators everywhere, and there are strong opinions on the best approach.

New survey results with 160 integrator responses showed them to be sharply divided. In this report, we break down the statistics, plus examining the main reasons for and against with detailed integrator commentary.

********* **** ** **** what **** *** ******, but **** ***** *** an **********'* ******** ***** ** shop *** ****** ********. This ** * ********* faced ** *********** **********, and ***** *** ****** opinions ** *** **** approach.

*** ****** ******* **** 160 ********** ********* ****** them ** ** ******* divided. ** **** ******, we ***** **** *** statistics, **** ********* *** main ******* *** *** against **** ******** ********** commentary.

[***************]

Divided ***********

****** **** ** *** responses **** **** **** specific ***** ** **** numbers ** ******, *** another **% **** **** list ******** ***** ******* in ******** *****. 

 

******* *** **** ******** are ******** *****.

Yes - *** ******** ********* / ************

**** *********** **** **** provided ******** ****** ** a ****** ** ******** integrity, *** **** ********* should ** ***** **** information ** ***** **** to **** ** ******** decision:

  • "********** - ** ******* in **** ************ ** the ******** *** *** everything **'** ******* *** compare ** ******* ** what ****'** ************* **** buying. ** *** **'** often ***** ****** ** displace ******* ******."
  • "** ** ********* **** specific **** ******* ** we **** ** ** as ******* **** *** customer ** ********. **** know ******* **** ****'** getting **** **** ****** our ***** ** ******* to *** ***** ******* who ***** * *** quantity ** "** *******" on ***** ******."
  • "** ** **** **** of *** *********. * want ******* *** ************ for *** *********. **** should ** ******* ** compare. ** **** *** going ** **** ** up **** * *** bucks ** * ******, they *** ****** *** a ******** ** **** anyway. **** ****** **** understand **** ****** **** can **** ********** *******."
  • "***, ** ****** ** be ******* *** ** know *** ******* ****** the ***** ******* *** get ****** *******. ** what ** **** **** what *** *** ** for, ** **** **** to *** ** ********** fine, *** ****.. *** when ** ****** **** or **** **** ****** you *** ** ***** deny ************** *** *** cameras... **** **** **** will *** **** *** because *** ******* **** products (********* *** **!)"
  • "** ******* ***** & models, ******* ***** (** PoE *.*** *-*** *********, etc.) *** ********* ** the **** ** ***** or *** ** *** include ****** **** *******. Despite *** ******* ****** customers "******** *** *****" there ** ** ********* factor **** ***** **** play, *** ** ***** by *** *******."
  • "***. ** **** ** be *********** ******* **'* important *** ** ** have *** ******** ********** what **** *** *******. And ** ***** ** differentiate ********* **** ***** companies. ******* ** *** not ******* '**** ****'* specials' ** **'* ****** for ** ** ******** that ***********."
  • "***, ** ****** ******* model, *** ************, **** in ***** ***** **** you **** ***** *** single ***** *** ***** solution."
  • "***. ******* ** ******* we *** *** *** customers ** ***** *** have ******* ** **** or ****, ** *** not *****-********. *******, ** we **** **** ** are ******* **** * shady ******** ** **** change **** *******."
  • "*** * **** *** Mfg *** **** #. I **** ** ******* a ******** ********, ** must ** ***********. * am *** **** ** fool *** ******. * believe ** ** ********* the ****** ** **** of *** ***** *******. An ******** ****** ** less ******* ** *** end ** *** *******. The *** ******* **** has **** *********** *** talked ***** ****** *** sale *** ************."

Yes - **** *****

********* ******* ****** *** customer ** ****** ********** the ********, *** *********** compare ** ** ***** alternatives. *********** *** **** more ** * "***** selling" ******** **** **** listing *******, *** ********** why **** ***** ******** components ****** **** ***** expertise.   

  • "** **, ** ****** our ******* ** **** exactly **** ** *** proposing ** **** **** want ** **** ** up *** ** ***** own ********."
  • "**** ** *** ****. We ****** *** *********** that *** ******* *** commoditized *** **** ** issue ******* *** ******** know **** ***** ** more ** *** ******** then **** *** ********."
  • "** ** **** * specific **** ****** ** well ** * *********** of *** ****. ***** were ***** **** ** first *** ******* **** we ****'*, *** * like ** **** * point **** ** *** more *********** **** **** security ********* ** *** design, *******, *** ************ procedures ** *** ********* so **** ***** **** the *********. ***** ** the ****** ** ***** designs **** **** "********" though, **** *** *** be * ******** ** continue ** *******."
  • "***, **** ********* **** to **** ** *** spec ****** *** **** what **** *** *******. And **** ** **** fulfill ********* ************."
  • "****** **** ******** ** clients **** ******* **** we *** ********."
  • "***, *** ****** *** detailed. ** **** ** show *** ********* **** they *** ******* ** there *** **** ** any ****** **** **** up ** ******** ** installs. ****, ** ***** is ******* ******* **** is ************* ******* **** our *****, *** *** other ******* **** *** have ******* ** ****, we *** ******* ****** the ******** ** *** those ******* ***** **** shows *** *** ****** the ***** ******* *** missed ** *** **** out."
  • "** ******* *** ** our ********* ** **** the ***** *** ********** of * ******. ****, for ********* ****** ** apples ** *** ******* the ****** **** **** better *******/********/******* *** ** is **** ** ******* it ** *** **** have *** **** **** - ******** ****** - $100,000"
  • "***. ** ***** ******** to ********** *** ******'* benefits, *** ***** *** project ******* *** *********** to ********** **** *** been ********. * **** some ****** *** ******** about *** *** **** shopping ** *** ********. I ***'* **** *** you'd ***** ***** ****. If **** ** **** to ***, *** **** to ****** ******* **** on **** ***** ** walk ****. ** ******** that **** ***** ** being *** *** ******** BEFORE *** **** * contract."
  • "***, ** ****** **** the ******** * ******** list **** *** **** numbers. ** ******* **** with ********* ******** *** best ******** *** ***** needs, ** ** **** like **** ** ******* understand **** ** **** they *** ******."
  • "*** *** * **** sure * **** *** ****** that ******* *** *** the **** **** ** they **** *** **** (OEM *****).* **** ******* issues **** ******* ** OEM ** **** ****** cameras." 

Yes *** **** ********** ********

******* ***** ******, ** products **** * ********** sales *******, ***** *********** to **** ******* **** less ******* *** *** customer ******* *** ******** out ** ******* ** prices ******:

  • "** ******* ** *** higher *** ****** ***** we *** ** ******** dealer. *** ***** *** quotes ** ******* **** specify ******* *****."
  • "***. ** ** *** an ***** *** **** and ******** ****."
  • "** *** ************ "******", which ** * ***** OEM *** **** ***** part *******, ** **** are ********* **** **** us ** **** ******** in *******."
  • "***, ** ******* ****** our *** ******* *** subsequently **** *** *** model *******, ** * have ** ******* ******* them ** ******. ****** we *** *** *** them ** ******* ****** would *** ****, ***, or ******** ** ****** for * **** ***** price."

No - ****** ********

******* **** ********* ******** quotes ****** ** ** other *********** *** *** primary ****** *********** **** for *** ******* ********* on *********.

  • "**. ****** **** **** take *** ***** *** go *** ***** **** on ******/****."
  • "**, ** ** *** want *** ******** ** shop ****** ***** *******."
  • "** - ** ******* shopping. **** ****** ********* products *** ** ******* online ******* ************ *******."
  • "******* ** ***'* ******* part ******* **** ********* as *** ****** *** easily ******* ***** ** want ** **** **** markup ** *** ********."
  • "** ***'* **** ***** numbers ** **** *******, but ** ** ********* the ***** *** **** description ** *** *******. A ***** ****** ****** be **** ** ****** out ** **** *** description ** **** ****** to."
  • "** * ** *** list ******** ***** *******. Why? **** * **** publish *** ****** ** the **** ** ****** can ****** **** *** replicate? ******* ******** **** numbers ** **** ** invitation *** ****** ** shop **** ***** ***/** complain **** **** *** buy *** ****** ******* from **** ******* *** site."
  • "**. ** *** * lot ** ****** **** into ********* *** ***'* want ** ** **** into * ******** ****."

No - ******* ***********

******* ************ **** ******** to ******* **** *********** in **** * ******* was *********** ** ************ time, ** ** **** a ***** ***** ** came *** *** * reason *** ******* ** concerns **** *****-********.

  • "**, ******* ****** (****, stock ***) ****** ** a ***** **** **** its ****** ** ****** to * ********* *******, too **** *********** **** to *** ***** ******* etc ** ********* *** good ** **** ** the ******** ** *** quoting *****."
  • "** ** **** *** product ** *** ********* or ****-******* ** **** of *******."
  • "** ** ********* **** latest *** ********."
  • "** ******* **** ****** so ******* ** **** as *** **** **** the ******** ***** **** "shop ******" ** **** have **** ***********."
  • "**, ****** ****** **********, we **** ****** *** best ****** *** *** camera ** *** **** of *******"
  • "*** *******. * ***'* **** to **** ****** * free ****** ** *** to ****** * ****** and **** ***** **** numbers *** ****** ******** will ****** **** ***** time ** ****** ** time...some ******** **** * year ** **** ** get ********."

Situation *********

* ***** ** *********** responded **** **** **** provide ******* ** ******** instances. **** ***** ** for ******** ********* **. proposals ** *** *********, or ******* ** ******** customer ************ ** **** detailed ******.

  • "**** ********* ******* ******** and ** ****** **** them. **** ********* *** ok **** ** ******* project ****."
  • "******* ** *** *********. If **'* * ******* customer, **'** **** *** whatever **** *** ***: part #, **** *******, etc. ** **'* * random **** **** ******* to **** *** ***** against *** ***** ***** slammer, **'** ******* ** much *********** ** ********, sometimes ** *** ***** of ********** ******* **** the ******** ******* ****** than **** ********* *** sheets."
  • "******* ** *** ******** and ********. **** ** list ************ *** ***** and **** ** **** general ***** ** ** know **** **** *** just ******** *****."
  • "********* ** *** ********. If **** ***'* ******* part *******, ** **** to **** ******* ************ that *** ******** *** understand."
  • "******* - ********** ********, yes. ********** ******** - 50/50. ** **** ***** list *** ***** ** we *** ***** * higher *** ****** ** the ******** ** ********* more **** * *** vs * ***. ** gives ** *** *********** to **** ******* *** usefulness **** *** **** of *** ******. ** we *** ******* ***** end ******* ***** *** race ** *** ****** is *** *****, ** don't ******* *****. ****** because ** *** ******* something ******* ** ** is ********* **** ** win."
  • "********* ** ***** **** in ***** ** ******** customer ********. *** ******** customers *** ***'* **** us, ** **** ******** the *****."
  • "** **'* * ****** bid ******* ** ** not *** **** *******. Make **** **** *** it. ** **'* * sold *** **** ** provide **** *******."
  • "****** ** ********. **** customers **** ** *** this. ****** ***'*. ** often ** ** *********** situations ** *********** **** we *** ***** ******* products."
  • "*** *******, ****** ***** is * ******** ****** to. ***** ******* ***** include *********** **** **** the ************ ** *** design/problem ******* ******* ** if *** ******** **** is * ****** *** to ***** *** ******* at ****."

Summary ********

**** ** *** *********** in ******** ****** **. not **** **** ** how *********** ******** ***** market. ***** ********* *** business ***** ** *** value ***** ******* ******** often ***** ** ******* full **************, **** *** mindset **** ** ******** customer **** **** *** a ****** ******* ************, and ***** **** ** price ***** **** *** worth ** *******. *********** selling ***** ** ***-**** had **** ****** ** reduce ******** ******* **** customers ***** *** ** try *** **** ** even ****** ***** *********, leaving **** **** ** the ******** ** *** hopes ** ****** ** more ********* *** **** to **** *** *********** prices.

Comments (9)

The comment that asked the question "does a chef publish his recipe" is a good analogy in an indirect way. This would be from higher end, considered quality restaurants. But the great majority of dining is at cheap and fast food places. There's money to be made at both. The question is, do you want to a short order cook business, or a Chef busines?

I think a more accurate analogy from the end user's perspective is "Does the menu list the main components of the dish? Would you purchase a "chef's special" pizza without knowing what's on it? We don't need to know the chef's recipe nor how it's made, but we want to know the major components of the product we're purchasing.

As an end user, I will not accept any quote that doesn't list the major components of the product/system I'm purchasing by line item, and with totals broken out by parts, labor, shipping/freight, and tax.

Ditto.  If this is too much to ask of you there are plenty of other good, reputable companies that are more than happy to do it.

I think a more accurate analogy from the end user's perspective is "Does the menu list the main components of the dish? .....We don't need to know the chef's recipe nor how it's made, but we want to know the major components of the product we're purchasing.

...

Hence, why I said not publishing the recipe, and did not say anything about not publishing the ingredients.

 

Well, you can take comparisons down to the granular level, but the question was whether to provide models on quotes, and the bottom line is that I do require it as an end user.

I treat people the way I want to be treated.  If I'm buying something like a car, a computer, a new television, a refrigerator, etc., I want to know the details, such as the make, model, performance reviews, etc.  I want the best price too, but don't want to deal with a "questionable" vendor.   I want to compare quotes and, yes, "shop" for the best deal. 

So, what is it about the surveillance industry that makes some integrators think their clients shouldn't know what they're getting until they are locked into an agreement?  If a client wants to use my quote, with all the makes and model numbers, to either DIY or leverage a price with another company, that's fine. I'm not trying to win a bid based solely on the parts.

I'm always curious when the word bid is used, how often it is really a bid. I have been asked to "bid" on a sound system against someone else after I had already given a recommended proposal based on what the needs were. Since they said bid, I asked for the design to bid on. The only thing they gave me was a parts list. With that part list, I could assume a horrible design that wouldn't make the system any easier to use and it wouldn't make it sound any better. The goal of the renovation was to make the system easier to use. I ended up telling the client that I wouldn't provide a quote on an equipment list. After that I still ran sound for certain events and a few years later, I renovated the sound system. However, there was great compromise with this, as they wanted to scale back from my original design to fit a smaller budget. There was a compromise to ease of use, but due to waiting, newer products were available that fit the design fairly well.

A bid usually implies a design. The design is typically paid for by the client to a consultant that doesn't sell anything. That design is then bid on. Many clients don't realize this and will simply ask for a bid when they are really looking for  2-3 different proposals that often can't be compared with each other even if product numbers are listed. So in the end, the client ends up getting free design work without the use of a consultant. Often we are doing design/build and the only way the built-in design gets paid for is when you get the job. The client also must determine from those proposals what system is the best based hopefully on education of some sort. However, this choice often times is simply based on price alone. This is why there is so much work in fixing other companies messes and making a poor install into a proper one or a functional one. 

I try to educate the client as much as possible into what they are getting with a system as well as what they may not be getting. An example we all know is the typical 4K camera isn't going to have that 4K quality at night, especially with poor lighting. Providing proper education and actually helping the client goes a long way.

surely the client would be better served with giving him the features of a particular camera and why the camera has been selected.in this instance the more professional integrator should get job. by features I mean IR or dark fighter, lens choice,f no etc.etc. AND WHY YOU PROPOSE THE CAMERA AND RECORDING DEVISE.

Manfred, you make a good point and simply listing the features may be ample for some or most end users. In my case, though, I do compare the differences in the SAME features across models. For example, some cameras simply have better smart CODEC than others, and some are better than others in specific environments. Some have better low light capabilities than others, and so on.

And, if you tell me that a camera has WDR, I'll want to know whether it is digital WDR or true WDR.

I do read the cut sheets of cameras that are proposed to me and read the IPVM analyses of the same cameras. I couldn't do that without the model numbers. Granted, not everybody looks at that level of detail, but we should have the option.

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

VergeSense Presents People Tracking Sensor on Jun 04, 2020
VergeSense presented its people tracking sensor and social distancing...
SAFR Presents AI Facial Recognition on May 18, 2020
SAFR presented its AI facial recognition at the April 2020 IPVM New Products...
Cancel or Not? Industry Split Over ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
The industry is split, polarized, over whether ISC West 2020 should run or be...
Access Credential Form Factor Tutorial on Feb 10, 2020
Deciding which access control credential to use and distribute, including...
Euklis Presents AI Analytics on May 05, 2020
Euklis presented its AI facial recognition, LPR, and object recognition...
Use Access Control Logs To Constrain Coronavirus on Apr 09, 2020
Access control users have included capabilities that are not commonly used...
Worst NVR / VMS Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 10, 2020
For the second time in a row, a global manufacturer has been selected by...
Vivotek Presents AI Analytics and LPR on May 19, 2020
Vivotek presented its AI Analytics and LPR at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Access Control Online Show July 2020 - On-Demand Recording of 45+ Manufacturers Presentations on Jul 30, 2020
The show featured 48 Access Control presentations, all now recorded and...
Ipsotek Presents AI Analytics and Object Tracking on May 15, 2020
Ipsotek presented its AI analytics tracking people and vehicles across...
Idemia Presents AI Facial Recognition Access Reader on May 18, 2020
Idemia presented its VisionPass AI Facial Recognition Access Reader at the...
Train Your Team With IPVM Courses From Experts on Mar 01, 2020
You trust and use IPVM for reporting and research and you can also have your...
HID Releases Lower-Cost Signo Readers on Mar 06, 2020
HID Global is releasing a new line of readers called Signo they claim read...
Convergint Coronavirus Cuts on Mar 25, 2020
One of the world's largest security integrators, Convergint, has made a major...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...

Recent Reports

Genetec CEO Declares "We Don't Negotiate Payment With Patent Trolls" on Aug 11, 2020
Are patent trolls like terrorists? Genetec's CEO is coming out strongly...
Hanwha AI Analytics Camera Tested on Aug 11, 2020
Hanwha has released their Wisenet P AI camera, adding person and vehicle...
Alabama Schools Million Dollar Hikvision Fever Camera Deal on Aug 11, 2020
The Baldwin County, Alabama public schools purchased a $1 million, 144-camera...
Dahua Taunts Australian Government, Continues To Sell Illegal Fever Cameras on Aug 10, 2020
Dahua is effectively taunting the Australian government by continuing to sell...
HID Releases VertX Replacement Aero on Aug 10, 2020
HID is replacing two established and broadly supported types of access...
NDAA Compliant Video Surveillance Whitelist on Aug 10, 2020
This report aggregates video surveillance products that manufacturers have...
Telpo China Temperature Tablets Tested on Aug 10, 2020
The provider for overseas companies ranging from Canon Singapore to US'...
Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...