OSDP Access Control Guide

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jun 04, 2019

Access control readers and controllers need to communicate. While Wiegand has been the de facto standard for decades, OSDP aims to solve major problems of Wiegand.

In particular, OSDP's benefits:

  • Bidirectional Communication, Including reader displayed feedback
  • Standardized biometrics integration with access systems
  • Handling large amounts Of credential data
  • OSDP's 'Secure Channel' version supporting data encryption

However, the protocol has several significant issues impacting adoption, including:

  • Unclear OSDP versions and profile definition
  • Lack of OSDP conformance checking
  • Vendors claiming only 'OSDP Support' is not enough
  • No Official OSDP 'Conformant Products' directory

This report examines those issues and more basic details including:

  • What OSDP Does
  • Why OSDP Is Needed
  • How OSDP is Organized
  • What OSDP's Profiles Are
  • Performance and Wiring differences between Wiegand and OSDP
  • What 'Secure Channel' means for OSDP

****** ******* ******* *** controllers **** ** ***********. While ******* *** **** the ** ***** ******** for *******,******** ** ***** ***** problems ** *******.

** **********, ****'* ********:

  • ************* *************, ********* ****** displayed ********
  • ************ ********** *********** **** access *******
  • ******** ***** ******* ** credential ****
  • ****'* '****** *******' ******* supporting **** **********

*******, *** ******** *** several *********** ****** ********* adoption, *********:

  • ******* **** ******** *** profile **********
  • **** ** **** *********** checking
  • ******* ******** **** '**** Support' ** *** ******
  • ** ******** **** '********** Products' *********

**** ****** ******** ***** issues *** **** ***** details *********:

  • **** **** ****
  • *** **** ** ******
  • *** **** ** *********
  • **** ****'* ******** ***
  • *********** *** ****** *********** between ******* *** ****
  • **** '****** *******' ***** for ****

[***************]

What **** ****

**** ********* ************* ******** between ******* *** ***********, eliminating *** **** *** 'proprietary *******' **** ***** 3rd ***** *********** *** readers ** *********** *** those ******* ***********. ****** functions *** ************, ********* how ********** **** ** sent, *********, *** *********.

******** ******** **** ** which ******** *** ****** displays, *** ********** ****** or **** ********, ** even *** **-*********** ********* verification ***** *** **** standardized. *** *** ****** market, ****'* ********* ** the ************* *** ** used *** *** ***** interoperability **** **** *************.

Why **** ** ******

****** ********** ******* ***** do *** ****** ***** own ******* *** *********** (and **** *****), *** the ********* *** ***** interoperability *** **** ******* by ******* *** ******* decades.

*******, **** ******** ** expands **** ******* *** maximum **** ********, ***** data ******** *****, ************* communication, **** **********, *** two-way ********* **********.

ODSP *** ********

*** *** ******** ****** up ***** ********** *** expands ** *****:

  • **-***********: ******** ************* ** travel **** **** ******* changes ** **** ****, even ******** ****** ********* like ****, ******* ********, or ******* ******** ** be ******* ***********. ********* on *** ******, ******** like ******** **** ** text ****** *** ****** based ** *** ****** of *** ****** ****** the ******.
  • ********* **********:**** ****, ******** *** be *********** ** ******, with **** ****** ******* of *,*** *****, *** layered ** ******** ********. This ***** **** *** more **** *********** ** bit ********* *** ******** as ******* ******** * credential (***********, ****, ** card) ** * ****.

How **** ** *********

************* **** ********** *** profiles ** ***********. ** the ****, **** ******** have **** ******** ** a *****-**** ********, **** versions ******** ** ****, 2014, *** ****. *** current ********** ******* ** 2.1.7, **** ****.

*** ******** ******** ** OSDP ******* **** ******** and ******** **** ****** products *******, ** *** maintains ******* ********* '**** profiles' ******** ******* *************** based ** **** ** product. ***** ******** *******:

  • *****: **** ******* ** the *** **** ******* card *** *** ****** card ******* **** ******* at * *******
  • **********: **** ******* ********* '2-way ************' *** ********* readers, ********** ********* **** central ****** *******.
  • ******** ****** ****: *** ****** ******** to ******** **** ***** card ****** ** ******** security ************* *****, ** ****** ***********, this ******* ********* ************ formats *** ***** ** complex ****.
  • **********: *** '*******' ******* that ** *** ******* reader ****** *******, ********** support, ** '*****' *****-**** message *******.

Generic **** ******* ******

******* ******* ******** '**** compatibility', **** ***** ** not ****** ** ****** which ********, ********, ** features *** *********. ******* SIA, *** ****** *********, make **** *****.

*** *******,**** *** ****** ** reader **** ******' ****' support*** **** *** ******* which ******* ** ******** are *********:

*** **** ** ******* regarding **** *****/******** ** OSDP ******* *******, *** when ***** ***** ****, SIA ******** ************** ** buyers ** **** **** clear:

*** ***access ******* ****** **** ** *********** **** ***** ******* on the OSDP profiles that they support, Basic, Secure Channel, Biometric, etc. While this system of communication and trust was not too much of an issue when only a few vendors were offering OSDP solutions we realize that this model will not work for long, and as stated, we will be working to address this.

**** ****** *********** *** significant ******* ****** ****** face **** ********** ****.

Limits ** ********* ****

** ******* ******** ** profiles *** ********, *** ability ** ******* ******** hardware ** *** ***** is *** ****** ********.

** *******, ** ******** designs ******* ********** ******** resources *** ******* ** update ******** ********, * simple ******* *** ** done ** ********* *********.

*******, ****** ******* *** control ****** *** ***** 'computing ***********' ******* **** cannot ******* ***** ******* or ********* ************* *** they **** ** ********** replaced.

* ****** ******* ** this ** ***** ** Mercury ******** ******, **** the ***** '****** *' SIO ****** ****** '****** 3 *********'.

*** ** *** ******* factors ** *** *********** of '****** *' ******** was ********** ********** ******* to ******* **** ********** released **** ******* *.*.* 'Secure *******', ***** ***** devices ******** ***** ************* ************ **** * firmware ******.

Comparing **** **. *******

*** ***** ******** ** both *** ******** ** this *****:

OSDP **********

*******, **** ******** ******* new ******** *********:

  • **** ******* ******: ****** *******, ***** OSDP ******** ***-******** ****** terminals *** **** ****** colors *** *** ******* additional ********** ********* ********* in *** *****, *********** driving ********* ********** *** adding ***** *****.
  • ******** ********: ** ********* *****, no ****** **** ******* is ************* *** **** than *** **** ******* is ******, ********** *** needed **** ***** *******. (See '******** **** ********' above *** **** ******.)
  • ****-******** ***********: *** ****** ** claim *********** ********, *** similar ****** ** ************* ****** ONVIF ***********, *** **** ** manufactures ****** **** *********** is * *********** **** and ****** ***********.

OSDP ****** **** ********* ********* & *****

**** ******* ******* **** Wiegand *** ****, *** require ***** ******** ********** for ****** ****.

*** ***** ***** ***** an ******* ****** ********** both ********* **** ******** wires ** ******* ********* on ****:

**** ******** **** *** conductors *** **** *** two *** *****, ***** Wiegand ******** *** **** for ********** ****** *********.

*******'* ***** ********** ****** in ************* ***** ******** with ******* ** *** wires ** ****. ** OSDP ******* **** ***** pigtails, ** ** *** to ******** ****** ******* or **** *********** ** an ******.

*** ******** *********** *** this*** ****** ** **************** ****** ** ***** are ******** ** * pigtail. *** **** ******, the '***/*****' **** (**-* terminal) *** '***' (**-*) connectors *** ********* *** OSDP:

****** *******, ***** '*****' and '*****' *** ********* standardized ******, **** **** colors *** ***, ***** can **** ** ********* confusion.

Not * *** *** ** **.** *** ****** *****

**** **** ******* ** mitigate ** ******* *** fully ******* ************* **** of ***** *** *** formats, **** *** *** detailed ****** **** ****** ******* With **** $** *** 125kHz **** ******,

******, **** ** '******'********* ******* ** *********** *** ****, ** the ****** ************ **** upstream *********** ***** ** unencrypted ******** **** ******* the ****** ** ********** to ******* **** ********* and *********** **** *****.

'Secure *******' **********

******** ******** ******* *.*.***** ***-*** *** ********** on **** ******* ****** and **********. ******** ******** of **** *** *** support **********, ** ** was *** ******* '*********' until ****.

**** **** ****** *******, the ******** ******* ****** and ******** ********** ** encrypted ******* **** ************ and ********* ******* **** 'man ** *** ******' devices. *** *******,*** ******, ************ ***** ***** 60 *******, *** ** done **** *** ******/********* side ** *** ****, and ** ************ ** the ****** *** ****** managers.

****** ***** ****** ****** is ********** ** *** risk ** ******* ******* when ******** *** ********* in *** ******. *** card *********** **** ********* can **** ** **** to ****** ********* ****** of ***** ***** ** to ****** ***** ******* signals ** ******* ********* readers ********.

*** ***** ***** ***** how ***** ******** *** typically *********:

******* ******** *** **** and *********** ** ***, with **** **************** ~$** - $** online.

Reader ********* ****** ********

*** **** ******* *** possible *** ******* ** the ******* ** **** system *********** *** **** prompts ** *******.

**** ****** *** ********** messages ** ** ********* to *** *****, ******* numbers *** ******* ******, and *********** **** ***** and ***** ** ** shown *** **** ***** applications:

** ****, *** '**********' OSDP ******** **** *** support **** ******* *** is **** ********* ** the '*****' *** '*********' versions.

Biometrics *******

** *********** ****** ** OSDP ** *** ********* authentication ** ********* ***** the ************* **** ******* between ****** *** ******.

******* ******* ********** ******* biometric ******** *********** ****** the ****** ** ********* stored ** *** ****** or ***** *********** ***** application, *** ***** **** offloads ******** ******* ** access ******* **** **** them **** ** ******* only **** ****** ** demand.

*** ***** ***** ***** how *** ******** ********* works:

*** *-*** **** ******** allows *** *********** ****** verifications, ******** **** **** will *********** ** * future ***** ** **** Biometrics ****.

Reader *** ********** ******* ********

** ****** ** ***** OSDP **** ** *** well **********: **** ****** and ********** **** ******* the ********.

****** *******, *** ******* protocol **** ***** ******** no ********** ************* ****** install, **** ********* ******** setting *** **********, ** the ***** ***** *****:

***** *** ******** ** 'auto *********' *** **** in **** ********,**** ******** ***** *******, *** ********* ************* is *** **** ** the ******* **** *************.

Controller ********* ******** ********

** ****, **** *********** call *** *** *** of ********* ** **** readers, ********** ** **** cable/ ***** ******* ****** runs ** ***** *** may ** * *******:

***** '***-**-****' ********* *** not ******** **** ********* alarms, ********* **** *** reader *** ** ****** is *** ******* **** Wiegand *** *** ** an **********, ****** *******, additional ****.

Self-Policing ***********

*********** *** **** ** false ****** ** **** SIA **** *** ***** or ******* ******** ******** OSDP ***********, *** ** external ***** ** ****** to ** **.

*** *********:

'***** ** ** *** party **** ******** ****** of **** **********. *** OSDP ******* ***** (**) started *** ** * small ***** ** ******* working ** ********* *** adding ** *** ****** OSDP ********* ***** *** them ** ****** **** they *** ***** **** correctly.

*** **** **’** **** a ***** ** *** number ** ******* ************* in *** **** ** and **** ******** ******* we ******* *** **** for * ************/************* ******* and *** ******* ** that ******* ***.'

********* * *********** ******* tool*** *** ******* ** not * ****** ***, requiring **** *********** ** tehnical ***** ** ***.

No **** *********** ****

******* ************ ** ***** is ** ********* ******* list ******* ***** ******* are ********** *** ***** are ****** ******** ******.

***********, *** ********* * list ** '**********' ********** *** ******* **** claim, **** **** *** offer ** ***** ** a ******* ***.

OSDP ******* *******, *** ***** *******

******* ******** **** ******* are ****** ********** ********** access ****** ********* *** Global/Mercury ********, ********, ****, Software *****, *****, *******, Farpointe ****, ********, *** Cypress.

** ***** ** ******* not ********** ****, '***********' brands, *********, *** **** distribution ****** ***** **** ProData *** ** ***.

*** ***** **** *** number ** ******* ********* OSDP ********* ** '****** 40-50, *** ******** ***** peripheral ****** (******) *******'.

*******, ****** *** ********** or ********* *********** ******* of ******* ******* *** better *******, *** ****** may **** ******** ******** and ********** ********* *** the **** ******* ******* standard.

Comments (38)

*** **** **** *** surveys ** *** **** integrators ******** ********* ****** control ************* ***** **** over *******?

**** ** ****, *** we *** ******** ** include **** ******** ** an ******** ******.

* ******* *** **** percentage ** ******* ***** low *** *******.

* ******* *** **** percentage ** ******* ***** low *** *******.

**** ** *** **** of ****** ******* ;)

**! (***:** ****** ******** ***** Ipv6?)

** ******** ** ****: I ***** **** '*****' a ********* ***** **** IPv4 **** *** ** solved ***** **** (**** bit ********* ** ****, for *******), *** **** 'fixes' ******* ******** **** cannot ** ***** ** 'tweaking' ******* *********.

***** ** ******** *** its ** *** ******* in * ****** ** large ***********.  ** ***** cases ***** ** * valid ******** **** *** the **********.  *** **** there ** *** **** business (***** *** *******) risk ********** ** *** broad ******.  ** ** also ********* *** ** sell *** **** ***** time ** ****.  *** OSDP ****** ******* ************* is ******** **** *** from ** ************* ******** perspective  ** ***** *** can ****** ************* *** interoperability ****** * ****** wide ******* ***.  *** of ***** ****** ***** to ******* ******** **** (in ** ****** ******* ;-). 

** ** ****** ** least, **** *** ******* and **** ***** ** not ******* **** *** new ********** *************. *** is ** **** ** the ** *** ****** when ** ***** ** new ******* *** ****? It ***** ** *********** to **** *** ***** OSDP ** ******** *********.

*** **** *** *** users, **** ***'* ****** have ******** *********. *'** seen ***** ***** ** tenders:

*. *** ***** ***** tender, **** *** *** user ***** *** *******/****** designer *** **** ******* cannot *********** ** *** second *****, ************.

*. *** ********** ******* an ***/*** ** ** end-user ******, ***** ** hard ** ********** ** win ** ******* **** (corruption). ******* - *** require *** ********** ** have ** ***** * ABCD ********* *********, *** you **** **** ***** are * ********* ** the ****** **** *** qualified. *** **** * deal **** ***** ****, provide *** ****** ** they **** **** ** submit *** ******* *** solution *** **** ********. You *** **** *******, they **** *** *** next *** **** ***** customer.

*. *** *** ** the ******** ***, **** the **** ****** *** their ********* ** *********** in *** ****** *** then ********* *** ********. Again, ********* *** ****** usually ********.

*** **'* ** *** industry **** *** ******** has * *** ** money ** *****.

** **** *** ******* Europe. ***, ** **, people **** ****, "** need ****** *******" *** the ***** *** ****** something **** ********** *** struggling ** ********* *****. Usually, ** ************ ********** or ***-**** ********* *** involved. ****** **'* * 200+ **** *******.

** ********* ******* ****: **** **** ***** ********** 2019

**** *** *** “*******”, does **** ***** ** the ******** ***** ********, i.e. *** ******, ** the **** ********, ** both, ** ** * not ****** *****?

**** ** ***** ** “TCP/IP” *******?

'*******' ** *** '********', although *'** **** ********* that '*********' *** ******* bi-directional ***** ******* ** not.

*** **** ***** **** for ******* ** ****** always ******/***** *********, *** it ***'* *********** *** or ******** *****.  ***/** cabling ** * ***** that *********** *** ******* specific ** ********.

*******' ** *** '********', although *'** **** ********* that '*********' *** ******* bi-directional ***** ******* ** not.

** ** ***** ****** to *** **** * given ****** **** ** Wiegand *******, *** **** the **** **** **** that **** ** (** least **** ***** ****) in ******* ******, **** when **** ****** **** OSDP ** *********** ** the **********?  

** ***** ********* ******* refers ** *** ****** scheme, *** ********* ** the **** ******, *** maybe *’* ********.

***/** ******* ** * label **** *********** *** cabling ******** ** ********.

** ******/*****?

** ****, ******* ** not * ******.  ** previously **** ********* * contactless **** ******, *** it *** *** **** a '******' *** **** years/decades, ** ** ****** access *** ** ********* only *** **** **** between ****** *** **********.

******* ** *********** ******; every ******* **** ** the **** ** ********** as * '***' ** the **********, ***** **** essentially ** ******* **** structured, ********** ****.

****'* * *** ** a ************** **** ******* how *** ******* / OSDP ****** ** ********* and *****, *** ** helps ** ********* *** difference ***** ***** *****.

***** *******. **** ***** OSDP ******* *** ***********, does *** ****** ******* software **** **** ** support ** *** *************?

***.  *** **** ** typical, ** *** *********** are ********** ** *****-***** devices ******* ** *** management ********.  ** *************, the ************* ******* ** the ********** *** *** software.

****** *** *** **** question!

*** *** ********* ******* directly ***** *** ****** command **** ****, ** addition ***** *** * number ** ***** ******** that ***** *** ** test, ****, ******, *** also ** *** ****** information **** ** ****, model, ****** ****** *** firmware *************. ***** ** open ****** ** ** able ** ** **** as **** ** *** Eidola ******* **** ** provide. ***** ** **** the ******* ** ** file ******** *** ****** readers.

********* ** *** ****** there ** **** ************* that *** ** **** independently ** *** ****** control ******.  ** ***** points *** ** ** easier ** ** *** readers **** ***********.  ** IDmachines ** **** ********* tools ************ ** **** this ***.

****** *** **** *******, IDmachines *** ********* **** SIA ** *** ** the ***** ** * series ** **** *********, 25 **** ** *** Headquarters.  ** ** **** of ** ******* ****** to ******* *** ****** chain ** ******* *********** and ****************, ******** ***** of *** ********* ******.  *****://***.****************.***/********-*********/****-**********-******-********/****-****-****/   *** ****** ****, for ********* **** ****. 

** *** ******* ***'* world, **** ** ******** mandatory **** ******* ****** for ****-** ******* ***** taken ********* *** ******* flowing ******* ****** ** happen.  

*'* **** ********* **** the ****** ***** **** not ******* *******, **** OSDP. ********* *** **** people **** *** *** install ** ******** ** does. 

**** ****** *** *********. Also **** *** ***+.  When * ***** ***** you **** ** ******* the ****** *** *** expander. ****

***** *** ******* **** statement ** * *****?  Not **** * ****** the "**** * ***** fails *** **** ** replace *** ****** *** the ********"  ****. 

*** ***** ** *** replacement *** *** ***** as **** *** ***** away. ***** ** ******* only *** *** ***** is **** ****.

* *** *** ***.   Meaning ** *** ***** fails, *** *** **** options ** ** ******* with * ***** **** you ***** **** ********* replacement ************ ** *** other ****** ***'* ******* OSDP.    

*** *** **** *** a **** ** ******* it *** **** **** require **** *********** *** you ***** *** **** maximum ****** ** *********** per ******.

*** ******* **** ********* the ***** **** *** LP1501 ** *** ********** of ******.  ** *** originally **** *** ***** for (*) **** ******* with * *** *** DC ** **** ****, you'll **** ** ******* (2) ******'* ***** *** LP1501 **** *** *** inputs.  ****, **** *** LP1501 *** ***** *** either *** ** ***+ capable.  ** ***** ***+, that ********* *** *** output ** *** ***** to *.*** ** *** LP1501 *** ** ** the ***** ***** ***** you **** ******* ********* power *** * ***** POE ********. 

 

*'* ***** ********* ******* didn't **** *** ***** Weigand ******* ** *** we *** ***** **** the ****** *** * POE *** ******* ********.  I **** **** **** to ******* ********** *** sale ** ******** *** compatibility *****, **** ********** I **** **** *** been **** ***********.

******* *** ** ***'** only ***** *** *** the ***** **** *** need ** *** * POE+ ******** ** ******* your ****** ** *** the ***** ** *** need **** *****. 

*** ***** **** ** transition ** ***+ ** get **** ***** ** matter **** ********** *** were *****.  *** ***** doesn't ******** ******* ***+, so ***'** ***** **** the ~.*** ****** ****** you *** * ***+ power ********* ** ***** the ***** *** ***** door *********. *** ***** gives *** ~.*** ** POE *** ** ** POE+, ** ** ***** the ******* ** ******* additional ***** ** ***** in.  **** ***** *** also **** ** **** at **** ****** ************* now **** *** *****.

*** ******* ****. ******* offerings ****** ***** *** designs * ***** **** to **.  ** *** LP1501 *** * ****** instead ** * ** would ******* ****.

***** ** ******* ****...

***** *** *** ********** me.  * ****** ****. 

**** ***** ** ***** 99% *****, ***** *** vast ******** ** *****’* in *** *** ****** not ***** **** ** an **** *****.

*************** * **** **** taken *** *******, **** everything ******** *******. ** course ** **** *** else ***** ** ********. 

*** *** ******** ***** to *** **** *** habit ** ******** ************* on ***** *** **** number *** * ****** and **********. **** ** it ** * *********** for ********* ****. *********** are ***. 

*'** ******* ******* *** comment ** ****-**** *****.  When * ***** ** them ***** **** **********, the ******* *** ** immediate ***** ** **** production ** *****, ******* it ***** * '*** 2' *****.

* *** **** *** that * ****** ***** for ** *****'* **** my ****** ****** ** filled ***** **** *** no ****** ** ********** and ********** *** ** stock.....

 

**** *** **** ****** as "** ****** ********* for ********" ** ***** website:  *****://*******-********.***/******/********/****:***********/*******:******-***********/

*****,

* ***** **** ********* needs **** **********.

Why **** ** ******

****** ********** ******* ***** do *** ****** ***** own ******* ************************(*** **** *****), *** the ********* *** ***** interoperability *** **** ******* by ******* *** ******* decades.

It ****** ** ******* *** ******* & **********. Since the OSDP protocol is being used in this area. correct me if i'm wrong.

****** **** *** **** great *******.

****** *** ******** ****. Fixed!

*** *** **** ********* a ************* ******* *** 2020. ***** **** ** a ***** ****** ** ISC **** ** ****.**** **** ****, ***** Course - *********** - ISC ****

(**-**** **** ***** **** posting **** ****** ** discussed **** **** ** ISC ****.)

*'** *** **** *** A1001 ** ****** *******. 2017 ******** ******, **? Will ****** ****.

*** **** *** ****** feedback ** ********. **** vendors *** *****/***** *** tx +/- *** **** still *** ***/***** *** +12/ground. **** ***** **** proxy ** **** ***** has ***** *******. ****** is ********* * **********, I'm *** ****** ** claim **'* *** *******.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Nortek Mobile Access Reader BluePass Examined on Feb 12, 2019
Nortek's Linear access control division claims to make mobile credentials "more secure and easier to use than ever before" with their BluePass...
Startup GateKeeper Aims For Unified Physical / Logical Access Token on Apr 04, 2019
This startup's product claims to 'Kill the Password' you use to keep your computers safe. They have already released their Gatekeeper Halberd...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...
Mobile Access Control Shootout - Farpointe, HID, Openpath, Nortek, Proxy on Jul 29, 2019
One of the biggest rising trends in access control is using phones as credentials but which offering is best? IPVM has tested five of the...
Mobile Access Control Guide on Aug 28, 2019
One of the biggest trends in access for the last few years has been the marriage of mobile phones and access cards. But how does this...
Fingerprints for Access Control Guide on Sep 09, 2019
Users can lose badges, but they never misplace a finger, right? The most common biometric used in access are fingerprints, and it has become one...
Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Directory of Access Reader Manufacturers on Nov 27, 2019
Credential Readers are one of the most visible and noticeable parts of access systems, but installers often stick with only the brand they always...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Paying $100 For Referrals Just To Demo on Jan 22, 2020
Some companies pay for referrals when the referral becomes a customer. Verkada is taking it to the next level - paying $100 referrals fees simply...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends. We cover: Middle East Enterprise...
Vehicle & Long Range Access Reader Tutorial on Jan 21, 2020
One of the classic challenges for access control are parking lots and garages, where the user's credential is far from the reader. With modern...
Clearview AI Alarm - NY Times Report Says "Might End Privacy" on Jan 20, 2020
Over the weekend, the NY Times released a report titled "The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It" about a company named...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...
"Severely Impacted" Mercury Security 2020 Leap Year Firmware Issue on Jan 17, 2020
One of the largest access controller manufacturers has a big problem: February 29th. Mercury Security, owned by HID, is alerting partners of the...
Apple Acquires XNOR.ai, Loss For The Industry on Jan 16, 2020
Apple has acquired XNOR.ai for $200 million, reports GeekWire. This is a loss for the video surveillance industry. XNOR.ai stunned the industry...
Installation Course January 2020 - Last Chance on Jan 16, 2020
Thursday, January 16th is your last chance to register for the Winter 2020 Video Surveillance Installation Course. This is a unique installation...
Halo Smart Vape Detector Tested on Jan 16, 2020
The Halo Smart Sensor claims to detect vaping, including popular brand Juul and even THC vapes. But how well does it work in real world...