OnSSI Acquires VMS Company Seetec

Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 08, 2015

The dominoes continue to fall.

One of the biggest VMS providers in North America, OnSSI, has bought one of the biggest VMS providers in Europe, Seetec.

In this note, we break down the strengths and weaknesses of this combination, and how it matches up against Axis/Milestone/Canon.

*** ******** ******** ** ****.

*** ** *** ******* *** ********* ** ***** *******, *****,*** ********* ** *** ******* *** ********* ** ******, ******.

** **** ****, ** ***** **** *** ********* *** ********** of **** ***********, *** *** ** ******* ** ******* ****/*********/*****.

[***************]

**********

***** ** * ******* ******* ***** ** *** ****, *** and *** ************* ** *********. ***** **** **** *** ***% owned ** ***** *** **-************ ************* *******.

****** ** * ******* ******* ***** ** ********, ******* *** *** previously ***** ** * ************* *********.

*** *********: *****'* *** ** ***************** ******** ** ***** *** ********** ********* ******** **** *********'* 'recorder ******'. ******'* *** ** ************ (*********** ****** ******** *****).

***** *** *** ********* *** ******* ***** *** ***********.

Strong ***********

************************ **** ***** ****.

  • ***** ** ****** ** *** ******** *** **** ** ******. Seetec ** ****** ** ****** *** *** ** ******** ** the **.
  • ***** *** **** ********* ** ****** *********'* '******** ******'. ****** has ***** *** *** **** *** ********* ****.
  • **** *** ****** ***** ********* ************ (**-** ********* ****). ********, they ****** *** ** **** *** ****** *******.

No '********' ********

******* ******* ***** *** ***** *******, ** **** **** *** create * '********' ********. ** *** ******** ****, **** ****** them ** ******** ** **** ********** ** ***** *** ** the *** ******************* ***** ****. ** *** ***** ****, **** **** *** ***** / eliminate *** ******* / ***** ************ **** **** ******* ********* bundling ******* *** *** ******** (*.*., *** **** **** ***** ********).

Vs **** / ********* / *****

** ******* *** *****'* *********** ** ********* *** ******* *********** of **** ****** ***** ***** *****. **** ***** *** ****** have *********** **** ** *** ********* ******* **** ***** ** building, ** ********* *** * *** ***** *** **** * top ******* ** ****.

***** / ****** ***** *** * ******, **** ******** ********** to *********. ***** *** ************ *** *** ********* ** '***** is **** * ********* ***' *** *** *** *** ********** combine ******** / ***************. ** *** ***** ****, ** ******* that ********* **** ****** ****** **** ***** ** *****-**** **** Canon/Axis, ********** ***** *********.

Challenges *** ***** / ******

*** *** *********** *** *******, *** *** ********* **: **** is **** **** ***?

*** ********** *** **** **** *** * *** ***** **** mostly *********** ********. *** '*****' ** *** ******* ***** ** a '**** *** *****' *** ******** *** **** ****.

*** *** *********** ***** **** ***** / ****** ******* ******* the ******* ****** ** '********' ********* *** *** **** **** VMS ********? **** ****** ** *************** ******** *** **** ***** to ******* ******** **********?

*** ***** / ****** **** ****** **** ***** **** ***** in *** ***** / ***-**** *** **** ***** **** ** solve ****.

Poll - ****

OnSSI *****

**** ** * ********* **** *****:

"***** ***** ** ******** ***** ********** ******** *** *** ******* recorder, **** **.* ***** ******** ** *** *** **** *** additional ******** ***** *******. ***** *** *** *** ******** **** become **** ***** **** **** ** *** ****."

****** *** *********

**** ** ********** **** ******:

"******* *** *********** ****** **** *** ****** ** *** ******** markets ** *** ****: *** ****** ********* ** ****** ****** will ** *** ***** ** *** ***** ******** *** ******* their ******* ******** **** ****. ***********, ** **** ** **** to ***** *** *** ******** ** *** ******** ******** **** our *** ********** *** ****** ********. **** ***** ******* * long-term *********** *** ****** ** **** ** *** ******. ***** gains ****** ** *** **********. ******** ** **** *** ****** company. *** *********** **** *** ****** ** ******* ********* ******* persons ** ****************. **** ***** **’** ***** * *******, *** is * **** ***** *** ** ******* ** ****** ** many *******. ***** ** ***** *** ********** *********, **** ********* are ******** ********* ********* ** ***. ****** ******** ************* **** this *********** – **** **** * ********** *** **** * technological ***** ** ****. **** *** *** ***** ** *** prepared *** *********** *** ************* ** *** *** ******** *** become *** **. * ****** ** **** ****** *********."

Comments (22)

What did OnSSI use for currency in this acquisition? They have not impressed me as a cash-flush company.

Any ideas what Seetec's revenue is/was?

I wonder if this was more of a merger of battered equals like the IQI and Vicon thing.

I asked but OnSSI did not disclose that. As for how they paid for Seetec, I have the same question, especially since Seetec is in the same size range (employee count).

In terms of revenue, I believe both are $10+ million range but I don't know a number that I truly trust.

As for the IQ/Vicon comparison, those two were in much worse shape than OnSSI and Seetec. That said, it does not strike me that neither OnSSI nor Seetec were 'crushing it' recently and with the world changing around them....

We've sold OnSSI for many years and most of my biggest complaints come from the things that are "stuck" with the Milestone engine & OnSSI can't rectify. I hope this merger is a general positive...

What are some of the things you've gotten complaints about?

Mine are the redundant events and other features that are found in both the management application and the admin component. Super confusing, especially to "end user admins".

So did Canon not want to OEM Milestone?

I do not know which way it ran but even if Milestone wanted to continue OEMing to OnSSI, I think OnSSI really benefits from having their 'own' VMS.

OnSSI has slipped from being one of the top VMS lines years ago, to almost "honorable mention" status. They have had a confused marketing process, and most dealers don't understand their licensing programs, which have changed repeatedly. That, coupled with the issue of "are you Milestone or not" was never succesfully addressed by their marketing efforts. Many end users did not view their client software favorably. This merger makes perfect sense and appears to be a good move to resolve these nagging issues, if they can pull it off.

I agree, John, that the lack of a full software/hardware solution has challenges...time will tell if the marketplace is wary of these other new "merged" offerings, and consider the independance of OnSSI/SeeTec a good idea.

I was just talking yesterday with a Milestone affiliate about the same subject - what was OnSSI going to do? Guess we know now.

Would it be wrong for me to gloat? ;)

..,OnSSI should buy one of the other smaller, non-US VMSes and integrate their recorder into whatever higher end functionality exists in Occularis that they actually own...

Leverage their U.S. customer base to roll out a Milestone-free product... In any event, they need to have their own recorder, either by writing their own or buying someone else's. They need to have their own product ready soon so they can parlay all the momentum and credibility they have gotten from embedding Milestone over the years...

When neither company can buy each other they just merge with an appropriately weighted stock swap... 2-12-2015

And perhaps to rub it in? :)

"Where is OnSSI getting the money to buy another VMS? Seriously, I don't imagine OnSSI or any smaller, non-public, independent VMS has the means to buy another company."

But, yes, your prediction turns out to be one hell of a call.

I always wondered why Milestone didn't just cut OnSSI off. I heard that Denmark didn't want to since it was good revenue, but look at how well it worked out for Genetec when they entered the market and essentially cut off Verint & DVtel. The nature of their software would have made it easy to simply "assume" the OnSSI customer base by simply installing their own client software and upgrading the SUP once it expired -- I've seen this work.

Now, it seems they've lost their chance. I would assume that some might still decide to jump ship because of this, but for the most part, it's a victory for OnSSI to finally eliminate their dependence on Milestone. Kudos to Mulli and Gadi for actually getting this far...I thought they'd be done long ago.

Well the conversion isn't done yet but it was definitely a wise move to decrease reliance on Milestone. They still have myriad obstacles to overcome:

  • Conversion of their "recording engine" to whatever SeeTec uses.
  • Any unknown contractual obligations to Milestone.
  • Conversion of legacy sites to the new recording system
  • Retraining of sales staff, support staff, and end users
  • Either making a new viewing client or rebuilding their old to support the new core system.

That assumes they don't utterly abandon the ONSSI platform to entirely switch to SeeTec.

Most likely a reasonable good opportunity for both, that is when both can aline strengths and features across the ocean. Having said that there is quite a difference in markets so it will be interesting to see how it all works out.

One (almost) vms vendor in one market with one (sounds like more real) vms vendor in another market. Sounds fine to me. Owners are in NYC? Who knows what kinds of financial voodoo they can summon so I'm not wondering where the money/credit/stock came from.

As long as they don't announce a 9000 pixel proprietary camera at ISC West...

Neither makes a camera Rodney, so its a safe bet a 9000 pixel camera will not be announced.:)

As long as they don't announce a 9000 pixel proprietary camera at ISC West.

Agreed. This is what a 10000 pixel proprietary camera looks like. It's actually the first digital camera ever, 100x100. Note the edge storage.

Being a seller of OnSSi. I do like the move and the soon to end reliance on Milestone recorders.

I believe OnSSi was moving in the right direction these past few releases, this is real good news.

Smoothness of Conversion to the new recorder "engine" and integration of the two (likely very different) software will be key to the success of this merger.

The interesting question is what does this do to Milestone? Owned by Cannon we know so dollars are not a major issue but remember OnSSI was a major part of the reported Milestone revenue each year. When OnSSI moves to the new recorder things will get very intresting very fast. One would expect they will attempt to move existing customers to the new recorder quickly to save on any money they must pay Milestone for annual software support. This will again create a loss for Milestone.

This is the move OnSSI needed to get back on top, let's see if they can capitalize on it.

K, good points.

Here's something that's weird. IMS/IHS always listed Milestone's own branded VMS revenue as essentially the same as Milestone's total corporate revenue (which should not be if they are selling a non trivial amount to OnSSI). I objected to this a while back but never got any clarity.

To that end, I've always been curious how much OnSSI actually contributes to Milestone's revenue. It may just be that IMS/IHS numbers are sloppy / off...

Don't cry for Milestone :) Next month, they will have Axis to not sell.

Prior to this, I was thinking that Canon / Milestone should buy OnSSI to aggregate the whole channel. I have to imagine this was at least discussed, so I wonder how far apart they were.

I would agee but if we just play with numbers and figure OnSSI is paying milestone 10% that woudl be a sizeable amount of money on thier annual sales. On the Milestone side we have to figure that this is almost free money as there is little to no expense tied to this OME sale so this goes directly to the bottom line. It won't make a big difference on the posted sales but will have an effect on true revenue.

On the recorder side i would expect they would continue to support both but we certainly have to believe they are going to push the SeeTec product and find a way to encourage customer to switch so they can keep all the $$ in house.

I agree Cannon missed an opportunity to bring alot of good, smart people in under the umbrealla. It would have been a great oppurtunity to split the produts and chase both ends of the market with two differnet product. This way you don't have to concerned about gutting your high end product.

Update from OnSSI on their plans:

"OnSSI plans to continue fully supporting Ocularis and the current recorder, with v4.2 being released at the ISC West and additional releases being planned. Plans for the new recorder will become more clear next week at ISC West."

Here is a statement from Seetec:

"Through the acquisition SeeTec will get access to the American markets in two ways: The server component of SeeTec Cayuga will be the basis of new OnSSI products and replace their current supplier [Milestone] over time. Furthermore, we will be able to offer our BVI solution in the Americas together with our new colleagues and global partners. Both steps provide a long-term perspective for SeeTec as well as for Cayuga. OnSSI gains access to our technology. Together we form one global company. The acquisition will not result in changes regarding contact persons or responsibilities. With OnSSI we’ve found a partner, who is a good match and is similar to SeeTec in many aspects. OnSSI is sized and structured similarly, both companies are software companies dedicated to VMS. SeeTec benefits substantially from this transaction – both from a commercial and from a technological point of view. With the new setup we are prepared for convergence and globalization in the VMS industry and become the no. 2 player in this market worldwide."

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
Motorola Acquires VaaS / Vigilant LPR on Jan 08, 2019
Less than a year after Motorola Solutions spent a billion to acquire Avigilon, the company has made another major acquisition spending nearly a...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...
CyberExtruder Face Recognition Profile on Jan 04, 2019
CyberExtruder offers 3D modeling face recognition software that they say provides quicker and more accurate matches than other 2D face recognition...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
Intersec 2019 Live Day 1 - Massive China Presence on Jan 21, 2019
There’s a massive presence from Chinese or China-focused video surveillance firms, chiefly Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, and Infinova, at...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact