Major Manufacturers Dropping MJPEG

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Nov 04, 2016

MJPEG has hung on for years, still in use in some systems despite H.264's dominance for the better part of the past decade. However, now some manufacturers have removed MJPEG from their cameras and recorders, forcing users to stream H.264.

We look at this issue, products potentially affected, and its impact on applications in this note.

***** *** **** ** for *****, ***** ** use ** **** ******* despite *.***'* ********* *** the ****** **** ** the **** ******. *******, now **** ************* **** removed ***** **** ***** cameras *** *********, ******* users ** ****** *.***.

** **** ** **** issue, ******** *********** ********, and *** ****** ** applications ** **** ****.

[***************]

The *****: ***** ******* *******

******* ** *** ***** setup *** ******** *************, and ** ******** *********, MJPEG ** ** ****** an ****** (** ** longer *******, *** *****).

*** *******, ******* ** the *** ********* ** a ********* ***** ******, H.264 ** *** **** option ***** ** *** "video ********" ********, ***** MJPEG *** ********** *****.

*** **** *** **** of *** ******* ********* models ** *******, ******* from **** ** **. None ********* *** ***** setup.

*********, ** ******* ***** cameras, *.*** ** *** only ****** *** *** main *** *** ******, shown *****. **** **** MJPEG *** ** **** as * ********* (** a ********** ** **** cases, *** *****).

VMS *******

***** **** *** ******* in *******, ***** ** no ****** ********* ** an ****** **** **** cameras ** *****, ******.

*** *******, ******** ***** support ** *****, ***** of ** ************* ** not ******* *** *****, only *.*** (**** ** the ****** *** ******* below). **** *** **** of *** *****, *********, and ***** ******* ** checked.

***** ***** ****** ****** did *** ******* ***** in ***** ******* ** had ****** **** ***** streams:

** ******** ******* ******, MJPEG ******* **** ********* in ***** *****. *******, when ********* ** **** stream, ** ***** *** displayed, **** *** ***** eventually ********* ** *.*** after **-** *******.
** ********* ******** *********, Bosch *******' ***** ******* could ** ********** *** streamed. *******, ** ***** stream *** ********* ** Hikvision ** ***** ******.

Impact ** ********** ************

*** **** *********** ****** of *****'* ******* ** on **** ******* ************ which ******* (** ******** prefer) ** ***** ******. For *******:

******* ***** ***********:**** *** ******* ******* MJPEG *** ****** *********, such ** ********* ***. *.*** *** ********* be ****, *** ********** additional ********** ***** ** frames **** ** *******.
***** *********: **** ***, **** ******/********* based ***** ********* *** MJPEG ******* ******* ** H.264. *******, **** *** become **** ****** ** the **** *-* *****.
********/**** **********:**** *********** *******/********* ** home ** ******** ********** systems, *** *********** ** often **** *** ***** streams. ******* **** ** view **** ***** (**** as *********** ** *******) can ********* **** **** snapshots ******* *****, *** ** not **** *** ********** power ******** ** ****** and ******* *.***.

Some ***** ***** *****

**** ** ****, **** surveillance ****** *** ************** still ******* *****, ******* the ********* *** ******* advantages ** *.*** *** its ********** ***. ***** responding ** ***** **** ****** carefully **** ***** ************, as ***** ****** ****** may ** ********** ** spec, ** ****** ******* with *** *****/********* ** see ** *.*** ***** be ********.

Note: ***** *** ****** *******

** *** ***** **** shown **** *** *****, MJPEG **** *** ***** image ******* ********** **** H.264. ** *** *******, H.264 ******** **** **** mature *** ***** **** experienced ** *** ** best ********* *** *****, with **** *********** ******** image ******* ** *********** artifacts due ** **** *-***** *********, ****** ***** * "safe" ****** *** ****. However, ***** ****** *** reduced ** ********** ** more ****** ***** *** better ********** ** ******* settings, ***** **** ********* user *********** **** *.***.

*** *** ******* ** *.*** ***** *******? *** *.*** ** ***** - Quality *** ********* ****** *** **** *******.

Vote - ****

Comments (15)

Matt Transue

11/04/16 12:39pm

I wonder if they are no longer supporting an MJPEG stream at all, or if they are just removing it from the web interface as a configuration option.

Maybe MJPEG is still available via. OID or API commands (i.e. for those specialized applications), but they simply don't' expose MJPEG to the user.

I see no real reason to not allow it at all, but I can understand now allowing a standard user to configure it. 'Save them from themselves' mentality?

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Matt Transue | 11/04/16 04:11pm

I agree with you, it quite likely is available via API. Especially considering most web interfaces default to MJPEG for live video display. It's just not an option when connecting with VMSes increasingly often.

Brandon Frazier

IPVMU Certified | 11/04/16 01:07pm

Many VMS mobile or web clients can only use MJPEG streams. If an H.264 is the only available stream it needs to be transcoded using CPU resources. If you can send it MJPEG it passes right through. I say keep it!

Undisclosed #1

11/04/16 01:16pm

I believe MJPEG streaming is required by ONVIF Profile S. So...

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 11/04/16 02:32pm

From the ONVIF mandatory features of Profile S

So either all Hik's cameras are no longer Profile S compliant or MJPEG is still there as an option thru ONVIF.

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 11/04/16 04:17pm

Well...start filling in the nonconformance form (joking, mostly).

I pulled up a Hikvision 2042 in ONVIF DM, no option for JPEG here:

It's not shown as an option in Profiles, either.

I added it to Exacq via ONVIF, as well, no MJPEG.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Ethan Ace | 11/04/16 04:41pm

Interesting. I wonder how these cameras pass the test tool?

btw, here's the table of contents page for profile S. It shows how MJPEG is treated as mandatory, although h.264 and MPEG4 are not.

I'll take a look at the test results for the 2042. Maybe ONVIF could clarify?

Sean Nelson

Nelly's Security | 11/04/16 04:02pm

i get tired of trying to jack with MJPEG to get it to work on home automation systems. I think HA systems should adopt h.264 decoding instead.

Undisclosed Integrator #2

11/04/16 07:16pm

What's the benefit of dropping it? I can't think of a time I have had to set a camera to MJPEG other than when a sales person underspecified processors on a server. Does it save development time or related costs in any way? If it does I would not mind it disappearing.

Ethan Ace

IPVM | 11/04/16 07:18pm

After 49 votes, opinions are fairly evenly split about drop vs. keep. 53% keep, 47% drop. I expected things to be more lopsided in one direction or the other.

Interestingly, integrators are more prone to drop; manufacturers are more prone to keep.

Sergey Bystrov

NetworkOptix | 11/05/16 01:17am

This is likely a little push to use H.264. This is not MJPEG drop.

MJPEG encoder is so cheap at the moment that it does not make any impact on hardware price. MJPEG encoder is part of any chip. On another hand it's not about ONVIF, MJPEG is still standard for browsers. Camera/device manufacturer still need to make browser UI wich natively works everywhere. We still need still images. And we still need a way to get those from the camera.

Undisclosed #1

11/05/16 02:57pm

Ethan, have you tried any of the old url's directly, like cgi-bin/video.jpg etc?

Chris Newhouse

11/09/16 01:14pm

Unfortunately, all MPEG compression protocols are subject to aliasing and artifact. Much of my projects are in manufacturing for process control and machine monitoring. We must use MJPEG to monitor machines in motion or there is blur that defeats to purpose of the camera. We installed a number of cameras in a stamping press of a major auto manufacturing plant to catch defects being made and determine the cause using frame by frame analysis. This wouldn't work with any compression and we had to use MJPEG.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Chris Newhouse | 11/10/16 10:13am

...determine the cause using frame by frame analysis. This wouldn't work with any compression and we had to use MJPEG

Try setting the GOP ratio to 1 or all I-frames, if possible.

All frames will be complete frames just like MJPEG, but the file size is still likely to be half, due to the better static image compression algorithims.

Attila Szucs

11/15/16 07:57am

My concern when testing. If I use MJPEG instead of the fancy , H264, H264+, H265, H'whatever coding I have less impact on the image quality. So first I always test MJPEG streams, then the H264, etc. With this I can see the real IQ, and the effect of compressions used. So different manufacturers can be compared better on videoIQ

Login to read this IPVM report.

Why do I need to log in?

IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ONVIF Video Surveillance Tutorial on Jan 29, 2019

ONVIF is well known within the surveillance industry as an interface to connect IP cameras and VMS systems. However, new users may find it...

Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020

Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...

2020 Camera Book Released on Jan 10, 2020

This is the best, most comprehensive security camera training in the world, based on our unprecedented testing. Now, all IPVM PRO Members can get...

Exacq Raises VMS Software Pricing Twice in Less Than a Year on Feb 18, 2019

Most VMSes regularly release new features, but rarely increase their prices. For the 3rd time in 4 years, and 2nd time in 8 months, since being...

H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019

H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...

Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019 on Jun 12, 2019

The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...

Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019

What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...

Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019

Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...

Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019

Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...

False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019

Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Milestone Launches Multiple Cloud Solutions on Feb 18, 2020

Milestone is going to the cloud, becoming one of the last prominent VMSes to do so. Milestone is clearly late but how competitive do these new...

Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance Thursday on Feb 18, 2020

IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course starts this month, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the most important...

Video Surveillance Architecture 101 on Feb 18, 2020

Video surveillance can be designed and deployed in a number of ways. This 101 examines the most common options and architectures used in...

UK Stands Behind Hikvision But Controversy Continues on Feb 18, 2020

Hikvision is exhibiting at a UK government conference for law enforcement, provoking controversy from the press, politicians, and activists due to...

IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020

Taiwan startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to be the leading Artificial Intelligence, big data video software as a service...