Genetec Mission Control Tested

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jul 13, 2017

Genetec continues to move up market with their Mission Control, "Decision Support System", bringing PSIM-like procedures and incident management to their 'unified platform' / VMS Security Center.

We tested Mission Control to see how it worked, what features it adds to Security Center, how complex monitoring and configuration are, and how it compares to existing PSIM and VMS platforms.

Related, see our coverage of Genetec's other platforms/features:

******* ********* ** **** up ****** **** ***** ******* *******, "******** ******* ******", bringing ****-**** ********** *** incident ********** ** ***** 'unified ********' / *********** ******.

** ****** ******* ******* to *** *** ** worked, **** ******** ** adds ** ******** ******, how ******* ********** *** configuration ***, *** *** it ******** ** ******** PSIM *** *** *********.

*******, *** *** ******** of *******'* ***** *********/********:

[***************]

*******

** *** *****, ******* Control *** ****** ** use *** ******** ********** and *********, **** **** little ******** ******** ***** and ****** ******* ***** management ******* ******** ** Security ****.

*******, ************* ****** ****** workflow, *********, *** ******** setup ** ** * substantial **** **********.

*******, *** **** ***** puts ** *** ** reach ** **** ************* who *** ****** **** functionality (****** ***** ******* less ********* **** ******* PSIM).  

********

**** *****, **** *** testing, ******** *** *********** features / ********* *** Mission *******:

******* ******* *** ***** **** components:

  • ******** *************, ***** ** Config ****
  • ******** **********, ***** ** Security ****
  • ******** *********, ***** ** Security ****

**** **** ***** ***** are ********* *** * separate **********, *** ******** in ******** ****** ** default. ******* ******* ** currently *** **** *********'* ****** ********** **** ** ******** updated. ******* **** **** Mission ******* ** ******** to ** ******* ***** every ***** ******, *********** of ******** ******'* ******* schedule.

Compared ** ****

******** ** ******* ****, Security ****** **** ******* Control ** ************* ***** cost. *******, ***** ***** integrations *** **** *******, with ****** ** ***** VMS/NVR ********* *********, *** limited ****** *** ********* lines, ***** **** ********* typically *** **** ****** agnostic.

**** ***** ****, ******** Center/Mission ******* ******** **** the ***** *********** ******* Genetec ********, ******** **** functionality *** *************, ******* of ****** ********* ****** and ***** ******* ** PSIM. **** *** ** attractive ** ******* **** customers ***** ******* ** their ***.

*******

******* ******* *** * base ******* **** ** $**,*** USD, *** ********* ******** licenses ($*** ****/$**,*** *********). This ******* ** ** addition ** ******** ****** licensing, ** ********** $*,*** base *******/$*** *** ****** (Enterprise ** ********, *** below).

******* **** **** ** intermediate **** ** ******* Control **** ** ******** in *** ****** **** lower *******. ******** ******** and ******* **** *** available.

******** ** ******* *** systems, **** ******* ** very *********, **** ******* Control's **** ******* **** above *** ***** ******* cost (** **** ******** cost) ** *** ******** of *******. *******, ******** to **** ******* ** may ** ********** *******, it ** ** *** lower ***, ** ************ most **** ************* **** been well **** *** ****** costs. 

Version / ****** *************

******* ******* ******** ******** Center **********. ** ** not ********* **** ******** and ************ ********.

****** *** ****** ********* by ******** ****** (********,********,******,*******, ** *******) *** be **** ** *********. This ******** ***** ****** detection *** *********, **** readers *** ********, *** cameras, ********* *********, ***. There ** * ***** license *** ($**) *** devices ********* *** *** Genetec ***, ***** ******** many ***** ***** ************ to ******** ******* **** as ********* *********. 

Incident **********

** *** *****, ******** Desk's ******** ********** **** was ****** ** ***, effectively ******* ** ******** event **********, **** *** addition ** **********, *********, and ******** **********, ********* below. 

***********, ** ** * modified ******* ** *** existing **********/***** ********** ***** found ** ******** ****, displaying * **** ** incidents ** **** ***** (top), ***** **** * map ******* ******** ********(*) below. ********* *** ******* via *** ******* **** shown ** *** *** below (**** ****** *** icons ********** *** *****/**********). 

** *** ***** ** the ******** **** *** map ** *** ******** pane, ***** ******** *********** about *** ******** ********, including *** ********, *****, monitoring *********, *** ******* state:

*******, ***** ** * set ** ******** ********* Procedures ******* ****** *****. These ********** *** ******** to **** *** ********(*) through **** ********, ****** for ************* *** ******** steps, *** ******* ********* which *** ** ****** for ******** ********.

***** *** ****** *** file **** ** * document, *** **** ********* these ***** **** ** images, ****, ** ***** documents. *** *******, ** part ** *** "**** Alarm" **** ********, ********* ******** a ***** ****** ** well ** * **** evacuation ****, ***** ****:

 

Incident ************* 

******** ** **********, ******** configuration ** * ******* task. ********* *** ***** ** two ********:

******** *************

*** ******** *** ******** a **** ***** ** actions ***** *** ********* when *** ******** ******. Elements *** ***** *** drag *** ****, ********* by ******** ****** ****** to ******. 

******* ******* ***** **********, such ** ********** * camera, ******* * *****, or ********** * *** to **** ** * specific ******. ************, ***** may ******* ******* ** incident **********, **** ** color, ****, ********, *****, etc., ******* ****** ** the ******** *** ******* video/info, ** ******* ***** incidents **** *** ********.

******* ********* ******* ** many ****** *******, ***** may ** * ******** to ************** **********, *** no ******** ** ******** required *** **** ********. For ******* ********* *** which ***** ****** **********, users *** ***** ** blank, **** ********* ******** adjusting ***** ********** ** the ******** ** ** progress. 

********* *************

*******, ********* ************* ****** users ** ***** * set ** ***** ** be ******** *** **** incident, ********* ******** *** certain *****, *** ********* related ********* *** *********, shown *****.

****** ********** *** *** complex ** ******, *********** SOP *** ********* ** a ***-******* **** ***** project. ************* ** *** level ***** ******* ******* is ****** (*** **********) are likely ** **** ******* procedures *******, ****** ***** must ** ********** ** Procedures ***** *** ******* to ******* *******, *** likely ** **** ******* tweaking ***** ***. 

Support *********

***** *** **** *** supporting ********* ** ********* for ******** *********. ***** may ******* *********** *** document ****, ** ******** Center ****** ***** *** document ** *** ********** viewer (****** ** ******* Photos, **** ** *******, DWG ** ******* ***.) instead ** ******* **** natively. Documents *** ********** **** a ***** *** **** via "***". **** **** one ******** *** ** associated **** * *** and *********.

** **** **********, **** organizations ****** **** ***** documents ** ******* ******, but ********* *** ********* related ***** *** *** in **** *** ** a *********** **** **********. 

Time ** *******/***** *****

******* ******* ******** **** audit ***** ** *** incident-related *****, ********* ***** viewing *** ********, ******** and **** **** *******, workflow ***** ********* ** skipped, ********* ********, *** more. *** ********** *** timestamped, ******** ******** ** assess *** **** ********* took ** ******* ** a ***** ********, ***** ********** of *** ******* *** specific *********, ***.

** ****** ********, ******* says **** **** ** adding * ******* ********* timer ** ** ****** for *********, ** ****** operators ** *** **** ******** for ****** ********. 

Incident *************

**** ***** ****** ** Security ******, ********* **** their *** ************* ****. Users *** ****** *** incidents ***** ** ****, date *****, *****, ******, location, *** ****. ****** clicking * ***** ***** unpacks ** **** * separate *** **** ******** entities.

***** *** **** ****** an ******** ** * report **** *********** ********, snapshots **** ******* *******, operator *****, ***.

More ******** **** ******** ****** ***** **********

********* ****** **** ******** Center's *****-** ****** ** two *** ****:

  • ** ***** ** ********: *** **** ******* ** operator *** **** ** an ***** *** *********** (default, *********, *** ********) and *******. ************ *** be ********* *** ** HTML ***, *** **** is ********** ******* ** Genetec *** ***** *** audit ***** ***** ** Incidents.

  • ******* ***** *****:****** *********** **** ***** who ************ *** ***** and ****, ** **** as **** ***** ***** fields. ** ********, ******* Control ****** **** ***** trail ** ******** ********, including ***** ********* **** the ********, ***** ** complete *****, **** ** user ****, *** ****.

Versus ********* ********

********* ******** ****** ***** to ******* *** ********** camera ** *** ***** source *** ** *****, without ********* ******** ********* of *** ***** ** be *******. *** *******, an ***** *** ** set ** ******* ** line ******** ********* ** all *******, *** *********'* Alarm ******* ******** **** the ****** ******. ***** cameras *** ** ******** configured ** ******* ** the ********, ** ****.

******** **** *** **** a ****** *** ** replicate ******* *******'* ********, attachments, ********, ***., *** a *** ** **** triggers ** ******** ****** in ********** (**** ** bad **** ****, ******** by ****** **** *****, followed ** ****** *********).

Versions ******

**** **** *** ********* using *** ********* ******** versions:

  • ******* ******** ******:*.*.***.****
  • ******* ******* *******:*.*.***.**
  • ******* *******:*.*.**.*

Comments (10)

From the report the software looks very impressive and I really wish Avigilon would have some like this to offer.

That said, with an MSRP of 75,000$ I don't think we would be able to sell a single license....

Thanks for reviewing! Did you require Genetec to set up the demo for you? Are there any competitive incident management packages you plan on reviewing?

We set up the software ourselves. It was not particularly complicated, though you want to make sure you read the prerequisites and instructions carefully beforehand. We actually had some server version mismatch issues which drove me nuts for a day before Genetec pointed it out.

As for other packages, we would be open to testing them. Do you have any suggestions as to which?

For clarity's sake, the software was not a demo version, it was a fully functional, licensed version running on our server.

Hi Ethan,

Great report and really interesting functionality, thank you! Just a minor correction though:

Milestone XProtect practically limits users to a single source and related camera per alarm. This essentially requires users to create an alarm multiple times if more more than one device is running analytics or VMD for example

This is actually relatively easy to accomplish. Here is an example Alarm definition...

Milestone Alarm Definition

And the resulting VMD alarms from two different cameras triggered by the same alarm definition above...

Milestone XProtect Smart Client VMD Alarms

Thanks again

Thank you for pointing this out. It was a misunderstanding in configuration and we just confirmed it.

Like you, I configured XProtect to trigger alarms on all cameras for motion detection, and each alarm shows video from the event source:

My original understanding was that you needed to manually select related cameras in the alarm configuration (below), but the triggering camera displays by default.

I'll update the report to reflect this, thanks.

Same for Genetec, if I'm understanding what you're trying to do correctly. In Genetec, you can have one general alarm (ie, "Motion Detected") and have multiple cameras trigger this alarm. Any entity triggering an alarm will forward through the video of any associated cameras into the alarm, so you can leave that "attached entities" field blank under the camera and it'll still pick up cameras from the triggering entity (whether a camera, door, zone, etc). It will even inherit some additional video settings like live/playback settings specified in the alarm (in image below, the alarm will pull the camera from the triggering entity but still use the "live and playback" settings configured).

That field is only useful to me if it's alarm that get manually triggered by an operator or if there are additional entities I want to display with the alarm.

Thanks for pointing that out. It somehow got by us. I've updated the report with this.

Interestingly, when testing, I remember at least a couple of instances where the triggering entity did not display. I will have to try and recreate that. But I just confirmed what you show above, thanks.

I vaguely remember hearing about an issue with this not working in one of the earlier 5.5 releases, I see it was tested on 5.5.670.1080 for this report. We're running 5.5.670.4045 (SR4) so I am assuming that the test version is GA or SR1, that may have been the cause. 

Would like to see a comparison with NICE (Qognify) Situator PISM. or a stand alone NICE Situator PISM review as well.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ONVIF Video Surveillance Tutorial on Jan 29, 2019
ONVIF is well known within the surveillance industry as an interface to connect IP cameras and VMS systems. However, new users may find it...
Salient CompleteView 20/20 VMS Tested on Feb 27, 2019
In IPVM's last test of Salient 3 years ago, we found various problems and deficiencies. Now, Salient says their new CompleteView 20/20 "unified...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
Airship VMS Profile on Apr 03, 2019
Airship has been developing VMS software for over 10 years, however, with no outside investment, and minimal marketing, the company is not well...
IndigoVision Control Center VMS Tested on May 30, 2019
IPVM's last test of IndigoVision's VMS was in 2010, which found enterprise VMS features and a simple client interface. but no 3rd party camera...
Exacq Remote Cloud Access Tested on Jun 20, 2019
Remote cloud access has been missing from most VMSes (including Exacq and Milestone). Now, Exacq, after releasing Cloud Drive Storage earlier in...
Milestone "GDPR-ready" Certification Claim Critiqued on Aug 12, 2019
Milestone is touting that its latest XProtect VMS is "GDPR-ready" with a 'European Privacy Seal'. However, our investigation raises significant...
Network Optix NxWitness 4.0 Tested on Oct 10, 2019
Network Optix released Nx Witness 4.0, proclaiming new features like a deep learning analytics metadata SDK, increased H.265 support, and UX...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R3 'Centralized Search' Tested on Oct 30, 2019
Milestone has had problems over the last few years releasing significant new software. Now, in XProtect 2019 R3, Milestone is touting "one search...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to be the leading Artificial Intelligence, big data video software as a service...
Access Control ADA and Disability Laws Tutorial on Feb 17, 2020
Safe access control is paramount, especially for those with disabilities. Most countries have codes to mandate safe building access for those...
ISC West 2020 Removes China Pavilion, No Plans To Cancel Or Postpone on Feb 17, 2020
ISC West plans to go on next month, amidst concerns over coronavirus. However, the Asia / China Pavilion has been removed, show organizers...
Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
IPVM Conference 2020 on Feb 13, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our 2020 conference. This is the first and only industry event that will be 100% sponsor-free. Like IPVM online, the...
Bosch Dropping Dahua on Feb 13, 2020
Bosch has confirmed to IPVM that it is in the process of dropping Dahua, over the next year, as both IP camera contract manufacturer and recorder...
BluB0X Alleges Lenel, S2, Software House Are Dinosaurs on Feb 13, 2020
BluB0X is running an ad campaign labeling Lenel, S2, Software House, Honeywell, AMAG and more as dinosaurs: In a follow-up email to IPVM,...
London Live Police Face Recognition Visited on Feb 13, 2020
London police have officially begun using live facial recognition in select areas of the UK capital, sparking significant controversy. IPVM...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in designing video surveillance systems. Though 'convergence' was a big...