Genetec Mission Control Tested

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jul 13, 2017

Genetec continues to move up market with their Mission Control, "Decision Support System", bringing PSIM-like procedures and incident management to their 'unified platform' / VMS Security Center.

We tested Mission Control to see how it worked, what features it adds to Security Center, how complex monitoring and configuration are, and how it compares to existing PSIM and VMS platforms.

Related, see our coverage of Genetec's other platforms/features:

******* ********* ** **** ** ****** **** ************ *******, "******** ******* ******", ******** ****-**** ********** *** ******** ********** to ***** '******* ********' / *********** ******.

** ****** ******* ******* ** *** *** ** ******, **** features ** **** ** ******** ******, *** ******* ********** *** configuration ***, *** *** ** ******** ** ******** **** *** VMS *********.

*******, *** *** ******** ** *******'* ***** *********/********:

[***************]

*******

** *** *****, ******* ******* *** ****** ** *** *** incident ********** *** *********, **** **** ****** ******** ******** ***** and ****** ******* ***** ********** ******* ******** ** ******** ****.

*******, ************* ****** ****** ********, *********, *** ******** ***** ** be * *********** **** **********.

*******, *** **** ***** **** ** *** ** ***** ** many ************* *** *** ****** **** ************* (****** ***** ******* less ********* **** ******* ****).

********

**** *****, **** *** *******, ******** *** *********** ******** / operation *** ******* *******:

******* ******* *** ***** **** **********:

  • ******** *************, ***** ** ****** ****
  • ******** **********, ***** ** ******** ****
  • ******** *********, ***** ** ******** ****

**** **** ***** ***** *** ********* *** * ******** **********, not ******** ** ******** ****** ** *******. ******* ******* ** currently *** **** *********'* ****** ********** **** ** ******** *******. ******* **** **** ******* ******* is ******** ** ** ******* ***** ***** ***** ******, *********** of ******** ******'* ******* ********.

Compared ** ****

******** ** ******* ****, ******** ****** **** ******* ******* ** significantly ***** ****. *******, ***** ***** ************ *** **** *******, with ****** ** ***** ***/*** ********* *********, *** ******* ****** and ********* *****, ***** **** ********* ********* *** **** ****** agnostic.

**** ***** ****, ******** ******/******* ******* ******** **** *** ***** integration ******* ******* ********, ******** **** ************* *** *************, ******* of ****** ********* ****** *** ***** ******* ** ****. **** may ** ********** ** ******* **** ********* ***** ******* ** their ***.

*******

******* ******* *** * **** ******* **** ** $**,*** ***, not ********* ******** ******** ($*** ****/$**,*** *********). **** ******* ** in ******** ** ******** ****** *********, ** ********** $*,*** **** license/$250 *** ****** (********** ** ********, *** *****).

******* **** **** ** ************ **** ** ******* ******* **** be ******** ** *** ****** **** ***** *******. ******** ******** and ******* **** *** *********.

******** ** ******* *** *******, **** ******* ** **** *********, with ******* *******'* **** ******* **** ***** *** ***** ******* cost (** **** ******** ****) ** *** ******** ** *******. However, ******** ** **** ******* ** *** ** ********** *******, it ** ** *** ***** ***, ** ************ **** **** installations **** **** **** **** *** ****** *****.

Version / ****** *************

******* ******* ******** ******** ****** **********. ** ** *** ********* with ******** *** ************ ********.

****** *** ****** ********* ** ******** ****** (********,********,******,*******, ** *******) *** ** **** ** *********. **** ******** video ****** ********* *** *********, **** ******* *** ********, *** cameras, ********* *********, ***. ***** ** * ***** ******* *** ($55) *** ******* ********* *** *** ******* ***, ***** ******** many ***** ***** ************ ** ******** ******* **** ** ********* detection.

Incident **********

** *** *****, ******** ****'* ******** ********** **** *** ****** to ***, *********** ******* ** ******** ***** **********, **** *** addition ** **********, *********, *** ******** **********, ********* *****.

***********, ** ** * ******** ******* ** *** ******** **********/***** Monitoring ***** ***** ** ******** ****, ********** * **** ** incidents ** **** ***** (***), ***** **** * *** ******* incident ********(*) *****. ********* *** ******* *** *** ******* **** shown ** *** *** ***** (**** ****** *** ***** ********** for *****/**********).

** *** ***** ** *** ******** **** *** *** ** the ******** ****, ***** ******** *********** ***** *** ******** ********, including *** ********, *****, ********** *********, *** ******* *****:

*******, ***** ** * *** ** ******** ********* ********** ******* during *****. ***** ********** *** ******** ** **** *** ********(*) through **** ********, ****** *** ************* *** ******** *****, *** sharing ********* ***** *** ** ****** *** ******** ********.

***** *** ****** *** **** **** ** * ********, *** most ********* ***** ***** **** ** ******, ****, ** ***** documents. *** *******, ** **** ** *** "**** *****" **** incident, ********* ******** * ***** ****** ** **** ** * fire ********** ****, ***** ****:

Incident *************

******** ** **********, ******** ************* ** * ******* ****. ********* are ***** ** *** ********:

******** *************

*** ******** *** ******** * **** ***** ** ******* ***** are ********* **** *** ******** ******. ******** *** ***** *** drag *** ****, ********* ** ******** ****** ****** ** ******.

******* ******* ***** **********, **** ** ********** * ******, ******* a *****, ** ********** * *** ** **** ** * specific ******. ************, ***** *** ******* ******* ** ******** **********, such ** *****, ****, ********, *****, ***., ******* ****** ** the ******** *** ******* *****/****, ** ******* ***** ********* **** the ********.

******* ********* ******* ** **** ****** *******, ***** *** ** a ******** ** ************** **********, *** ** ******** ** ******** required *** **** ********. *** ******* ********* *** ***** ***** desire **********, ***** *** ***** ** *****, **** ********* ******** adjusting ***** ********** ** *** ******** ** ** ********.

********* *************

*******, ********* ************* ****** ***** ** ***** * *** ** steps ** ** ******** *** **** ********, ********* ******** *** certain *****, *** ********* ******* ********* *** *********, ***** *****.

****** ********** *** *** ******* ** ******, *********** *** *** incidents ** * ***-******* **** ***** *******. ************* ** *** level ***** ******* ******* ** ****** (*** **********) *** ****** to **** ******* ********** *******, ****** ***** **** ** ********** to ********** ***** *** ******* ** ******* *******, *** ****** to **** ******* ******** ***** ***.

Support *********

***** *** **** *** ********** ********* ** ********* *** ******** reference. ***** *** ******* *********** *** ******** ****, ** ******** Center ****** ***** *** ******** ** *** ********** ****** (****** in ******* ******, **** ** *******, *** ** ******* ***.) instead ** ******* **** ********. ********* *** ********** **** * given *** **** *** "***". **** **** *** ******** *** be ********** **** * *** *** *********.

** **** **********, **** ************* ****** **** ***** ********* ** digital ******, *** ********* *** ********* ******* ***** *** *** in **** *** ** * *********** **** **********.

Time ** *******/***** *****

******* ******* ******** **** ***** ***** ** *** ********-******* *****, including ***** ******* *** ********, ******** *** **** **** *******, workflow ***** ********* ** *******, ********* ********, *** ****. *** activities *** ***********, ******** ******** ** ****** *** **** ********* took ** ******* ** * ***** ********, ***** ********** ** the ******* *** ******** *********, ***.

** ****** ********, ******* **** **** **** ** ****** * visible ********* ***** ** ** ****** *** *********, ** ****** operators ** *** **** ******** *** ****** ********.

Incident *************

**** ***** ****** ** ******** ******, ********* **** ***** *** investigation ****. ***** *** ****** *** ********* ***** ** ****, date *****, *****, ******, ********, *** ****. ****** ******** * given ***** ******* ** **** * ******** *** **** ******** entities.

***** *** **** ****** ** ******** ** * ****** **** timestamped ********, ********* **** ******* *******, ******** *****, ***.

More ******** **** ******** ****** ***** **********

********* ****** **** ******** ******'* *****-** ****** ** *** *** ways:

  • ** ***** ** ********:*** **** ******* ** ******** *** **** ** ** ***** are *********** (*******, *********, *** ********) *** *******. ************ *** be ********* *** ** **** ***, *** **** ** ********** outside ** ******* *** ***** *** ***** ***** ***** ** Incidents.

  • ******* ***** *****:****** *********** **** ***** *** ************ *** ***** *** ****, as **** ** **** ***** ***** ******. ** ********, ******* Control ****** **** ***** ***** ** ******** ********, ********* ***** operators **** *** ********, ***** ** ******** *****, **** ** user ****, *** ****.

Versus ********* ********

********* ******** ****** ***** ** ******* *** ********** ****** ** the ***** ****** *** ** *****, ******* ********* ******** ********* of *** ***** ** ** *******. *** *******, ** ***** may ** *** ** ******* ** **** ******** ********* ** all *******, *** *********'* ***** ******* ******** **** *** ****** camera. ***** ******* *** ** ******** ********** ** ******* ** the ********, ** ****.

******** **** *** **** * ****** *** ** ********* ******* Control's ********, ***********, ********, ***., *** * *** ** **** triggers ** ******** ****** ** ********** (**** ** *** **** read, ******** ** ****** **** *****, ******** ** ****** *********).

Versions ******

**** **** *** ********* ***** *** ********* ******** ********:

  • ******* ******** ******:*.*.***.****
  • ******* ******* *******:*.*.***.**
  • ******* *******:*.*.**.*

Comments (10)

From the report the software looks very impressive and I really wish Avigilon would have some like this to offer.

That said, with an MSRP of 75,000$ I don't think we would be able to sell a single license....

Thanks for reviewing! Did you require Genetec to set up the demo for you? Are there any competitive incident management packages you plan on reviewing?

We set up the software ourselves. It was not particularly complicated, though you want to make sure you read the prerequisites and instructions carefully beforehand. We actually had some server version mismatch issues which drove me nuts for a day before Genetec pointed it out.

As for other packages, we would be open to testing them. Do you have any suggestions as to which?

For clarity's sake, the software was not a demo version, it was a fully functional, licensed version running on our server.

Hi Ethan,

Great report and really interesting functionality, thank you! Just a minor correction though:

Milestone XProtect practically limits users to a single source and related camera per alarm. This essentially requires users to create an alarm multiple times if more more than one device is running analytics or VMD for example

This is actually relatively easy to accomplish. Here is an example Alarm definition...

Milestone Alarm Definition

And the resulting VMD alarms from two different cameras triggered by the same alarm definition above...

Milestone XProtect Smart Client VMD Alarms

Thanks again

Thank you for pointing this out. It was a misunderstanding in configuration and we just confirmed it.

Like you, I configured XProtect to trigger alarms on all cameras for motion detection, and each alarm shows video from the event source:

My original understanding was that you needed to manually select related cameras in the alarm configuration (below), but the triggering camera displays by default.

I'll update the report to reflect this, thanks.

Same for Genetec, if I'm understanding what you're trying to do correctly. In Genetec, you can have one general alarm (ie, "Motion Detected") and have multiple cameras trigger this alarm. Any entity triggering an alarm will forward through the video of any associated cameras into the alarm, so you can leave that "attached entities" field blank under the camera and it'll still pick up cameras from the triggering entity (whether a camera, door, zone, etc). It will even inherit some additional video settings like live/playback settings specified in the alarm (in image below, the alarm will pull the camera from the triggering entity but still use the "live and playback" settings configured).

That field is only useful to me if it's alarm that get manually triggered by an operator or if there are additional entities I want to display with the alarm.

Thanks for pointing that out. It somehow got by us. I've updated the report with this.

Interestingly, when testing, I remember at least a couple of instances where the triggering entity did not display. I will have to try and recreate that. But I just confirmed what you show above, thanks.

I vaguely remember hearing about an issue with this not working in one of the earlier 5.5 releases, I see it was tested on 5.5.670.1080 for this report. We're running 5.5.670.4045 (SR4) so I am assuming that the test version is GA or SR1, that may have been the cause.

Would like to see a comparison with NICE (Qognify) Situator PISM. or a stand alone NICE Situator PISM review as well.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Axis Supports HD Analog on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP': Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.  Why the change?...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
Hikvision AI Problems Criticized By Chinese Publication on Apr 09, 2019
Hikvision's facial recognition works poorly, causes delays and worsens learning, according to a new investigation by one of China's leading...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already. Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...
Airship VMS Profile on Apr 03, 2019
Airship has been developing VMS software for over 10 years, however, with no outside investment, and minimal marketing, the company is not well...
Dahua Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 01, 2019
Dahua favorability declined, in IPVM's 2019 integrator favorability series, driven by their backdoors, resulting in mass hacking and US government...

Most Recent Industry Reports

H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
Register for the Spring Access Control Course. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike manufacturer...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...
Milestone Drops IFSEC on Apr 18, 2019
Milestone has dropped out of Europe's largest annual security trade show (IFSEC 2019), telling IPVM that they "have found that IFSEC in EMEA no...
The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact