Video Enhancement Startup (Lentix) Partners With Milestone

Author: John Honovich, Published on Sep 29, 2015

There's a startup that claims to enhance video quality from HD IP streams, integrated directly into Milestone.

In this note, we examine Lentix, based on feedback from the company, examining its functionality, pricing and potential impact.

Update - We have now added a short test and results video inside.

*****'* * ******* **** ****** ** ******* ***** ******* **** HD ** *******, ********** ******** **** *********.

** **** ****, ** *************, ***** ** ******** **** *** *******, ********* *** *************, ******* and ********* ******.

****** - ** **** *** ***** * ***** **** *** results ***** ******.

[***************]

Lentix *****

********* ********* ***** *********** ********,*****, **** *** ********** ************ **** *** ******* ** *** expanding **** *** **** ********** *** *******.

**** ******* ***** ***** *** ***** *********** ** ******:

**** *** ****** **** **** ******.

****** ********* *****, ******** ** ******* *********** ********** ** ******* lighting ******, *.*., **** ***** ****** *** *** ** ** night.

Milestone ***********

****** ********* ***** ** **** ****, ********* *** ******* *** 'corrected' ***** *******.

** ******** ** *** *** *********** ****** ***********, ****** *** developed ** *********** **** ********* *** *** ***** ****** ****** so **** *** ********* ***** ****** *** ** ********* ****** Milestone ****** **** ********* ** * ******** ******.

*********, ********* ** *** **** *** ****** *** ********** ****. Milestone's ******** ****** *** / *********** ***** **** ******* **** most *****.

Processing ****

****** **** ********** / ********** ***** ** ********* *********. ***** higher *** ******** *****, ****** **** **** *** ******* ******** feeds ************** ** **** ***** **** (*** *********** *****). *******, **** ***** *** *****, *** ********** **** ** ******* to *** ********'* ***, ***** *** ******* **** ** *** available ********* *** ***** *** ******* **** ***** **** *** a ****** *******.

Pricing / *********

*** ******* **** *** **** * ****** ******* / ********* structure ****** *** ***. **** ********* $*,*** **** *** *******, with * ******* ** ** ******** *** **** ********* ********* volume ********* ** ** **% *** *** ****** ****** ******. Lentix **** *** ***** ******** ******** ** ********* ******** (*.*., * 50 ****** ****** *** *** ** ******** ** ********* ******** at ********* *****) *** *** *** **** ***** *** *********** or ****** *** ******* ***.

Competitive ******* - **** *** ********

***** *** **** ******** ***** *********** ******** ********* **** ***** can ** ******** **** ***** *** *********. *******, ***** *** few **** **** *** ****-**** ********** **** ************ *******. *** most ******* ***** ******** ** **** **** **** *************** ********* ***** ******** ***** *********** ********** / ********. **** recently, **** ******** *~$** *** *** *** ********* ******** *****.

******** *** *** ** *** **** *****-** ******* *********** ************ of *** ********* ***, ***** **** ******* ******, ** ***** ****.

Free *****

****** ****** ******** **** ** *** **** ***** ****.

Test *******

***** ** * **** ***** ******* *** ****** ***** *********** in ******. *********** *** **** *******, **** ******* *******, **** video ******* *** ******* ************:

** ** ******** **** **** **** ****** ** ********* ******** that *********** ***** ******* ***, ** ***, *** **********.

*********

*** **** ** * *********** **** ******** ***** ** * key *****. *******, ** ******** *****, ***** ** ********** ********* to ******* ***** ******* ***** *** ****.

*** *** *********, **** ** *** **** ** **** *** faced - *** **** ** ***-** ******** ***** **** ************* at ********** ******* (**** $*,*** ** **** ** ******* ** it ** **** **** *** ***** ** **** **** *** cameras *****) *** ***** *********** **** **** ****** *** ******* using.

*******, ******'* ********* ***** ****** ****** ** * **** *****. *** us **** **** *** ***** *** ** *** **** ** to **** **.

Comments (20)

Huh. The cameras in their video are some of Avigilon's demo site cameras.

I asked them about that. They are not integrated into Avigilon's VMS but they said that Avigilon let them use some of their streams for testing purpose.

So the demos are not of live video?

I am not sure if that makes a difference. To this process, it is just ingested video, whether its live surveillance feeds or your favorite Miley Cyrus music video.

I am not sure if that makes a difference...

I think it makes a big difference and here's why:

It's supposed to be instantaneous realtime enhancement right?

Watching that video certainly reinforces that claim.

So, if one purchased it and therefore expected to see real-time enhanced live video but that enhanced video was delayed 4 seconds, one might be disappointed, correct?

Yet in the video they seem to be virtually in-sync, frame-for-frame, surely a wonderous feat of image processing. All the more amazing that such a computationally heavy process (as they claim) never introduces even a single frame offset on those multi-mega-pixel Avigilon clips!

Ok, it could be, what do I know?

But since the demos are not 'live' there is no way to be sure that the clips are not re-aligned after the fact, ostensibly so that one can easily see the enhancement delta. If they were adjusted, then it should be stated.

To this process, it is just ingested video, whether its live surveillance feeds or your favorite Miley Cyrus music video.

No, when it comes to image processing these are not the same at all. Unlike unbuffered live video, the Miley Cyrus video offers what's known as 'look ahead' processing, where the process makes decisions based on things ahead in the timeline. This knowledge reduces artifacts and a greater degree of enhancement.

Of course if you want a little 'look ahead' processing on live video, you can always buffer as much as you want, but there goes the instantaneous enhancement.

Take a look at this other, unnarrated Xpose demo video.

Notice how the the moving car is ahead by > 3 secs in the opening shot. Also, notice how the latency seems to change at times to almost nothing. This is possibly a more realistic example of what you might get if you purchased Xpose.

Final observation, I don't see a whole lot of movement in any of these clips, maybe the processing requirements are more than anything dependent on scene complexity / movement.

Therefore I feel yes, it is critical to see a live enhanced stream, side by side with the unenhanced, preferably with various complexity and motion.

I will download the demo when I get back to the lab. ;)

That was a very long way to say, "What about latency?"

Latency is definitely a concern, I don't know if it's critical though. Of course, it depends how much latency - 200ms, 2s, 20s, etc. But, I would think even 2s is probably not a big deal for most applications unless you are providing commands to a responder or trying to control a PTZ at the same time.

The bigger issue for most users is just how much better the video becomes.

The bigger issue for most users is just how much better the video becomes.

That can be the biggest issue, that's ok with me.

Anyway, after reviewing the videos they are clearly saying that the enhancement is taking place just as it is shown, without a perceptible delay.

So pretty amazing.

So pretty amazing...

<edit> So pretty amazing the balls these guys have...<\edit>

The demo video is obviously doctored. The enhanced video on the right is a few seconds ahead of the original on the left. Now thats real enhancement showing something a few seconds ahead of realtime. That is amazing.....This is not latency but rather its predicting the future by 3 seconds ....what an amazing break through in surveilance.

As much as I like to criticize manufacturer marketing material, I am not sure the point of putting so much emphasis on their demo videos.

They have a free trial. If you want to check it out, check it out.

We may try it out tomorrow in between Axis analytic and another camera test.

...but does it really work...?

Curious why they use Avigilon cameras, fact is that if the dynamic range is not captured then it cannot be shown! Looks that they do some video processing as well but if the dynamic range is not there, there is not much the tool can do without raw material.

...fact is that if the dynamic range is not captured then it cannot be shown!

But is what is shown all that has been captured?

For monitoring purposes, I could see this work. However, for evidential purposes, I would not think this would be acceptable due to the fact this is software and not a filter changing the data. Once software changes data, then the picture is not 100% official even though it looks more like the real thing. The-hair-above-average person does this with simple photo software to the more advanced Photoshop software when dealing with personal photos. In these programs, it is known as an "Effect". It is not live video software, however, I'm just pointing out it is a software effect. When it comes to software editing of images, if we allow this, then we allow the possibility of “Photoshoped” evidence in our judicial system.

This is something you should ask the company and others what they think is acceptable software editing when it comes to evidence. Where should the line be drawn?

Good point.

They mentioned they keep copies of the 'raw' video and the 'corrected' video. If it ever got to trial and a suspect contested it, you'd probably need to go to some expense to have an expert analyze and verify the 'correction'.

Related: Lessons Learned from a Video Forensics Expert

I'd disagree. All pictures are computer digitized images. Camera with Wide Dynamic Range have modified the final pictures to a certain extent. I'd think the only time it would really be a contention if is was a single video clip altered by a person after the fact. If many or all streams are being enhanced [altered] automatically without thought influencing a future outcome, I don't see it as being that much an issue.

Ultimately, it's for a court to decide, if someone objects. What someone could argue is that the automatic alternation skews or misrepresents reality (e.g., the software makes it seem like a person is holding a gun when in fact it's a shadow).

We did a short test. Not impressive - extreme latency, questionable, if any image improvements:

Funny that Avigilon is mentioned since Avigilon has a similar feature built in of "Display Adjustmetns" and I would say any other respectable VMS too.

Avigilon also increases or decreases the amount of light in the picture when you digitally zoom in and out of dark places. I think Lentix does a better job but the price is not proportional.

Is it me or this simple histogram curve manipulation, like playing with the Levels dialog in Photoshop? There is usually "hidden" information in the dark areas of most images/video that becomes easier to see once you crank the gamma levels.

The demo videos underscore the need for video enhancement but $1000 MSRP per channel for histogram manipulation seems rather high. If I remember correctly from my days at StarDot, they had histogram correction in their image processing FPGA but I don't think precise control parameters were offered to the user. The point is realtime histogram correction / manipulation can also occur at the edge.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...
CyberExtruder Face Recognition Profile on Jan 04, 2019
CyberExtruder offers 3D modeling face recognition software that they say provides quicker and more accurate matches than other 2D face recognition...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact