Lux Rating / Minimum Illumination Guide

By: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 23, 2016

Lux ratings are one of the poorest specifications to use in selecting cameras. Now, with the rise of integrated IR, they are increasingly useless.

You need to be able to understand why lux rating (aka minimum illumination specifications) are so problematic, how they are established and what tricks / techniques are used.

In this guide, we explain why lux rating (aka minimum illumination specifications) are so problematic, how they are established and what tricks / techniques are used:

  • How lux ratings are tested / determined
  • The incorporation of shutter speeds in lux ratings
  • Dealing with lux ratings that include 'sens up' settings
  • Color vs B/W Impact
  • Understanding how IRE levels are used
  • Advances in super low light cameras
  • The practical lux levels typically specified based on analyzing 2000+ camera specifications
  • How to avoid getting burnt by lux levels
  • IR illumination and lux ratings

*** ******* *** *** of *** ******* ************** to *** ** ********* cameras. ***, ******* **** ** ********** IR, **** *** ************ useless.

*** **** ** ** able ** ********** *** lux ****** (*** ******* illumination **************) *** ** problematic, *** **** *** established *** **** ****** / ********** *** ****.

** **** *****, ** explain *** *** ****** (aka ******* ************ **************) are ** ***********, *** they *** *********** *** what ****** / ********** are ****:

  • *** *** ******* *** tested / **********
  • *** ************* ** ******* speeds ** *** *******
  • ******* **** *** ******* that ******* '**** **' settings
  • ***** ** */* ******
  • ************* *** *** ****** are ****
  • ******** ** ***** *** light *******
  • *** ********* *** ****** typically ********* ***** ** analyzing ****+ ****** **************
  • *** ** ***** ******* burnt ** *** ******
  • ** ************ *** *** ratings

[***************]

Lux ****** ***** / *************

**** ***********, ***** ***************** ** ******** ***** to ****** ************ *** ratings. **** *** ****** self-assigned ***, ** *** discretion ** *** ************.

**** ***** **** **** manufacturer **** ** ****** what ***** ****** **** use, *** **** ** the ******* ****, *** positioning ** *** *****, the **** ******* / chart ********, ***.

**** **********, **** ************ decides **** ** ***** is ** ***********. ** ** **** point, ****** ** ***** discretion **** ******* *** self-assigned *** ******.

*** *******, ** *** image *****, **** *** level ***** ****** ** considered "****", *** **** no *************** ** ****** nor ******* *********, ***** is "*****"?

images

***** **** ************ ** free ** **** ***** own ****, **** **** an ********* ** ****** the ******* *** ********, knowing **** ** ***** competitors **** ** *** same *****.

Shutter ****** *** *** *******

***** ************* **** **** lux ******* ** ********* or ******** ******* ******. Some **** */***, ****** 1/2s, **** ***** * full ****** *******. ***** should ****** ************** ** any ******* ***** ***** than */***. ***** ***** longer ******* ****** ***** more ***** *** ***** minimum ************ ******,****** **** ** * significant *********** **** ******* ******.

** *** **** ***** example *****, *** ************ lists ******* ************ ** 1/30s *** */** ******* speeds:

beware shutter speed in specs

** ******, *** ******* illumination ************* '*****' ****** at */**, *** **** is *** ************* ***********, simply ******* *** **** light *** **** ****.

F ****** *** *** *******

***** ** ***** * manufacturer **** ******* ***** minimum ************ ******** * different* ********** *** **** *** camera ****. *** *******, a ************ ***** *** their ****** *** ****** is *.** *** ** f/1.0 *** *** ****** may **** ** ********** f/2.0 ****.

** *** ******* *****, this ** *** ****, with ******* ************ ****** at **.*, *** *** camera ******** **** ** F1.8 ****, ***** ************ **** **** *** amount ** ***** ** an **.* ****.

beware differing f-numbers

**** ******** *** ************'* own **** **** **********, correcting **** ***** ***** means *** ******* ************ is ** ***** .*** lux ****** **** .* lux.

Sens ** *** *** *******

****-**** ********* * ********* term *** **** *******. The ****** *** **** up "*****", *** ****** shutter, **** **** ********** (2x, **, ***, ***.) simply ********** ***** */*** to ******* *** ********* shutter *****.

*** *******, *** **** sheet ***** ***** * separate ******* ************ ** "x256 ****-**." **** *********** amounts ** ** ********** 8.5 ****** (***/*** = 8.53) ******** ****, ***** would ****** ** ******* ghosting ** ****** *******.

*** **** ** **** you *** *** ***** lux ****** *** *** impressed. ******.

Color ** */*

******* **** ******* ********** cut ******* (*** */* cameras) **** ***** **** 2 *** *******, *** first ** ***** ****, the ****** ** **********. This ********** ** *** to ********* *********** ** monochrome **** *** ** ambient ** ***** ***** the ** *** ****** blocks ** ***** ****. Claimed *********** *** ***** substantial, ** ** *** examples *****, ***** **** list ********** ******* ************ specs */**** ** ***** mode (************* *** ******).

minimum illumination specs

***** ***** *** ** ambient ********* ***** ** occur, *** ********* *** typically **********. ****** ***** enhancement *** ******** *** has ******* *********** ** color *** ********** ******* much ******, ** **** in **** ********** ***** from * ******* ********** camera ** *** **** scene.

color vs monochrome

IRE ******

*** *********** ** ******* *** analog ******* *** *** not ********** ** **. IRE ** * ******* of *** ******** ***** in ** ****** ***** signal, ****** ***** ********* video *******. ***** ** cameras ** *** ******* analog ****** ** ***** full **********, ** ** a **** ******.

* *** ************* ***** list ** ** **** sheets, ******* ********* ******* illumination ****** *** ********* IREs (**** ***** ** and **). *******, ***** it ** ******* *** manufacturers *** ******* **** IRE, ** ********* ***** the ***** ******* ************ spec ** ***** ***** (typically **), *** ******** lower ********.

ire level in specs

******* ** ****** ******* have ***** ** *** past ***, ****** *** of **** **** ********** IR, ** **** ***** IRE ****** ***** ** applied ** ** ****** cameras, **** ***** *** make * **********.

Beware ** *********

**** ************* (******* *******) attempt ** ******* ********** by ******* "* ***, IR *********" *** ***** non-integrated ** *******. **** they *** ****** ** "If *** *** *** add **** *** ** light ******, *** ******* need ** *****." **** is ********* **** *** any*/* ********* ********** ******* ** requires ****** ***'* *** IR *********** *****.

Super *** ***** ********

** **** *****, ** was ********* *** ****** accurately ******** **** *** cameras **** **** ** low *****, **** *** 'best' ***** ******** **** high ****** ** ***** and ******** ** ***** dark **********.

**** *** ******* ** the **** *** ***** as (*) ******** ** low ***** ***** ********** have ********* *** (*) as **** ****** ******* are ****. ******* *** now *********** ******* *** enhance ***** ******* ** processing ***** ********* ****** the ****** ********. ********, 1/2" ***** ******* **** emerged ** * ***** and ***** *******, ******** with ***** **********, ******* low ***** ****** *********** in *** **** (*.*., see ******* */*"************ */*"****** *****). *******, ***** are * *** **** large ****** ** ******* (e.g. *' ** ****) that ******* ** ******** low ***** ****** ****** at *** ****** ****** (e.g.,****'* ** **** ****).

Practical *** ******

**** ***** *** ******* illumination ************** ** ****+ cameras ** *** ****** Finder. **** ****, ** found ***** ********* ******:

  • .*** *** *** *****
  • .** *** *** *****
  • .* *** *****

0.00X *** *** *****

*********************** ******* ************ ** these ********* ***** ************ *********** their ******'* *** ***** performance. ** **** *****, these ****** *** *** to************ ****** **** ** slow *******, ***** ** ******, it ** ****** *************.

***** *** ************ ****** in **** ******** *** standouts **** ** *****'* IP *********** **** (***** blurred ****** ******* ********* due ** **** *******,*** *** **** *******) *** *******'* *******, a *** ********* ****** with * **** **** F2.8 ****.

** *****, ** ******* of ************* ****** ****** below *.** ***, ** performance ****** ******* ***** specs.

0.0X ***

** ********* ******* ** ***** **** super *** ***** ******* are ********* *********. **** range ******** *** *** light ********** **** ** Axis' ************************,******* ***-**** *** ***-****, *******'* *** *** ***-***** and ***-*****, ****** ** *** "safest" ************** *** ***** seeking *** *** ***** performance.

**** ** *** ** say ** ************* *** overstating *********** ** ***** levels. *** *******, **** the ******** *.**-**-** *** Axis ***** *** ********* at *.** ***. *******,*** ********* *** ******** ******'* performance ** **** ***** that ** *** *****.

0.X ***

******* ********* ** **** level*** ********* **** ** low *****. **** ******** contains **** ******** ********** cameras ***** *** ***** performance *** **** ********** by *** ********** ******. Additionally, **** ***** **** fixed ****/**** *-**** ****** which **** ****** ****** in *** *+ *** range *** ********* ****.

**** **** ** ***** factors **********, ** *** light ** * *** concern, ******* ********* ** this ***** **** ****** not ******* ********* ***********.

1+ ***

******* **** ******* ************ ratings ***** * ******* ** **** ** even ******** *** ***** conditions. ***** ******* *** most ****** ***** ***** cost ***** **** ********* (such ** ******* *********** **********) *** ********* ****** such ** ********** ***-**************** **-*****/***.

IR ************ *** *** ****** - *** ******

**** ******* ***** **** / ******** ******** ********** **.

******* ** ****, *** ratings ** *** ********* apply ** ****, ***** these ******* **** ***** own ********. ** ** possible ** **** ** cameras ** ******* *** IR *********** *** **** is ********* *** ****. As ****, **** ** cameras ****** * *** rating ** * ***, since **** ** *** need *****.

** ********** *** ****** is ***** ******** *** IR ******* **** ** is ********, ********* ****** color **** (***** **** IR ** **, *** camera **** ** ***** and *****). *** **** example *****:

**** *** ************* ******* from *** **** ******* as *** ***** *******. Moreover, ***** ** ******* have ***** *** ************, many, ********** ***** **** ones, *** **** ** low *****, ******* ** their *****-** ** ************* to **** *** ***** bright (*.*.,*** ********** ****** ***** cameras).

What ** **

** *** ***** ** important ** ***, *** do *** **** **, and *** **** ******* minimum ************, **** ********** the ********* ************* ********:

"******* ************ ** *.** lux ** */*** *******, no *********** *******."

*** ********* *** **** is **** ******* ********* at *.* *** ** higher *** ****** ****** fairly *** ** *** light, **, ** *****, you *** ****** ***** cameras. *******, ** *** specify ********* ***** **** that, **** .***, *** significantly ******** *** ****** of ********* ****-******* *** light ******* **** *** conservatively *********.

*******, **** **** ** include *** "*/*** *******, no **** ******* *******" to ******* ************* ********* specifications **** *** ******* gamed *** ******* ** introduce *********** ****** ****.

****** ****,****** **** **** *********** *** ******* *** light ************ ******* *** test ******** ** *** how **** ** ***** in **** ****** / light ******.

[****: **** ***** *** originally ******* ** **** but *** ******* ** December **** *** **** to ******* ******** ** integrated ** ***** *** development ** ***** *** light *******.]

Comments (13)

Great article ! Every manufacturer puts all kinds of tricks to give spectacular demos at their boot, but once you test the cameras in the lab, you see the real performance ! And there's a big difference in behaviour, also according to the lenses you use. Same camera with same settings, but varying brands and types of lenses also give a wide variety of performance. Maybe this can be an interesting test as well.

The main issue with lenses and low light is variance in f stop. Higher f number, less light passes.

We actually tested / demonstrated this in our f stop tutorial:

That said, this only is possible with cameras where you can swap out lenses, which are in the minority in the industry today (most commonly box format).

With all of the trickery that manufacturer’s use to hide their products’ true low light level capabilities, I have given up specifying low light performance. Even using performance recommendations like you have suggested are challenging because the manufactures don’t publish all of the detail needed to properly analyze the camera’s performance. Until there are some meaningful standards and the products are tested by an independent testing agency (like IPVM), I will stick to specifying a few cameras that I have confidence in.

Rob, I think that is a solid approach.

We put out those performance recommendations because some organizations are not allowed to specify specific models (procurement rules, etc.). Our goal with our recommendation is primarily to stop unrealistic lux rating specs (like camera must be 0.00001 lux) that reward the bad actors and screw good products.

John, this is vey helpful in situations like ours. I work for a university and everything over a certain price has to go through the procurement (bid) process or be gotten from a recognized "sole source vendor". Specific language is important. Thanks.

Usually when i need to value cameras sensitivity i check the illumination level necessary to form the full signal at Gain=1, Texp=1/50, if possible turn off gamma correction and auto-iris just in case. mostly it is in the range 10 - 40 lux (F1.4) easy to measure. the behaviour in other conditions is very predictable.

#1, yes, once you have the camera you can definitely use techniques to measure / assess.

The big challenge for many specifiers is knowing before buying / getting a camera.

All above is valid but there are additional factors that also need to be considered.

1) As shown at the beginning of this article video noise is a major factor in the usability of the picture . The A, B, and C show this clearly with "C" having the best signal to noise ratio ( S/N). Manufacturers again distort their specs based on S/N by giving the sensitivity spec with "AGC ON" and/or "Sense Up ON" then the S/N with "AGC OFF" and/ or "Sense Up OFF" obvious that specs. should be done with the same settings.

2) The lux rating for the scene is given but critically no manufacturer speaks about the reflectivity of the scene. So they measure with a white card or other highly reflective object. Then the installer puts the camera viewing a parking lot that is black asphalt with virtually no reflectivity.

3) The old IRE was a valid measurement for surveillance and broadcast. It, combined with the S/N values, gave a more accurate picture of how a camera performed. The 30% number with a high S/N would indicate a good minimum usable picture. It would be nice if there was way to duplicate this with IP cameras and manufacturers using this as a standard ( We can dream can't we).

4) In actuality the best way to standardize light measurement and take the lens "f" stop and reflectivity out of the equation is to use a measurement of the light at the faceplate of the sensor as the specification. A number of manufactures tried to implement this many years ago ( analog cameras) and it fell to the wayside because this would keep all honest and many did not want to be honest.

5) At the end of the day the user is the victim of all the specification manipulation as many times they buy product that does not work in their application. The single best way for the user to protect themselves is to have an onsite demo with competitors doing side by side before they buy the system.

4) In actuality the best way to standardize light measurement and take the lens "f" stop and reflectivity out of the equation is to use a measurement of the light at the faceplate of the sensor as the specification.

I agree, measurement at the sensor takes the reflectivity out of the equation. How do you take the lens out of the equation, though? Measuring uncollimated light doesn't seem accurate.

a measurement of the light at the faceplate of the sensor as the specification.

Some manufacturers will just pass along the minimum illumination from the imager supplier. But that does not help since those numbers are not any more realistic or helpful for an end user buyer nor will it help compare to others who use different approaches.

There were and maybe still are light meters that accept a C or CS lens and have correct spacing to measure the light at the back of the lens which is equal to the faceplate.

You can always make one:

You of course are correct about manufactures using the sensor manufacturers specs. In fact this goes even further. Much like Brian pointed out the other day about the OEM China's makers specs being used by the seller verbatim, some camera manufactures just copy specs from the higher class manufacturers and put them on their spec. sheets so they are comparable.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Hikvision DeepinView Camera Analytics Tested on May 08, 2019
Hikvision is expanding its 'deep learning' offerings with a new camera series called 'DeepinView' claiming false alarm reduction and improved...
Dahua ePoE Long Distance UTP / Coax Tested on May 03, 2019
Dahua's Enhanced PoE (ePoE) line is claiming extended video and power transmission over 600m without repeaters, with devices interchangeable via...
Registration Closed - Spring 2019 IP Networking Course on May 02, 2019
Register now for the Spring 2019 IP Networking course here - Closed. Last chance now.   This is the only networking course designed specifically...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact