Lux Rating / Minimum Illumination Guide

Author: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 23, 2016

Lux ratings are one of the poorest specifications to use in selecting cameras. Now, with the rise of integrated IR, they are increasingly useless.

You need to be able to understand why lux rating (aka minimum illumination specifications) are so problematic, how they are established and what tricks / techniques are used.

In this guide, we explain why lux rating (aka minimum illumination specifications) are so problematic, how they are established and what tricks / techniques are used:

  • How lux ratings are tested / determined
  • The incorporation of shutter speeds in lux ratings
  • Dealing with lux ratings that include 'sens up' settings
  • Color vs B/W Impact
  • Understanding how IRE levels are used
  • Advances in super low light cameras
  • The practical lux levels typically specified based on analyzing 2000+ camera specifications
  • How to avoid getting burnt by lux levels
  • IR illumination and lux ratings

*** ******* *** *** ** *** ******* ************** ** *** in ********* *******. ***, ******* **** ** ********** **, **** *** ************ *******.

*** **** ** ** **** ** ********** *** *** ****** (aka ******* ************ **************) *** ** ***********, *** **** *** established *** **** ****** / ********** *** ****.

** **** *****, ** ******* *** *** ****** (*** ******* illumination **************) *** ** ***********, *** **** *** *********** *** what ****** / ********** *** ****:

  • *** *** ******* *** ****** / **********
  • *** ************* ** ******* ****** ** *** *******
  • ******* **** *** ******* **** ******* '**** **' ********
  • ***** ** */* ******
  • ************* *** *** ****** *** ****
  • ******** ** ***** *** ***** *******
  • *** ********* *** ****** ********* ********* ***** ** ********* ****+ camera **************
  • *** ** ***** ******* ***** ** *** ******
  • ** ************ *** *** *******

[***************]

Lux ****** ***** / *************

**** ***********, ***** ***************** ** ******** ***** ** ****** ************ *** *******. **** are ****** ****-******** ***, ** *** ********** ** *** ************.

**** ***** **** **** ************ **** ** ****** **** ***** source **** ***, *** **** ** *** ******* ****, *** positioning ** *** *****, *** **** ******* / ***** ********, etc.

**** **********, **** ************ ******* **** ** ***** ** ** is*********. ** ** **** *****, ****** ** ***** ********** **** becomes *** ****-******** *** ******.

*** *******, ** *** ***** *****, **** *** ***** ***** easily ** ********** "****", *** **** ** *************** ** ****** nor ******* *********, ***** ** "*****"?

images

***** **** ************ ** **** ** **** ***** *** ****, they **** ** ********* ** ****** *** ******* *** ********, knowing **** ** ***** *********** **** ** *** **** *****.

Shutter ****** *** *** *******

***** ************* **** **** *** ******* ** ********* ** ******** shutter ******. **** **** */***, ****** */**, **** ***** * full ****** *******. ***** ****** ****** ************** ** *** ******* speed ***** **** */***. ***** ***** ****** ******* ****** ***** more ***** *** ***** ******* ************ ******,****** **** ** * *********** *********** **** ******* ******.

** *** **** ***** ******* *****, *** ************ ***** ******* illumination ** */*** *** */** ******* ******:

beware shutter speed in specs

** ******, *** ******* ************ ************* '*****' ****** ** */**, but **** ** *** ************* ***********, ****** ******* *** **** light *** **** ****.

F ****** *** *** *******

***** ** ***** * ************ **** ******* ***** ******* ************ assuming * ********** ********** *** **** *** ****** ****. *** *******, * ************ might *** ***** ****** *** ****** ** *.** *** ** f/1.0 *** *** ****** *** **** ** ********** */*.* ****.

** *** ******* *****, **** ** *** ****, **** ******* illumination ****** ** **.*, *** *** ****** ******** **** ** F1.8 ****, ***** ************ **** **** *** ****** ** ***** ** ** **.* lens.

beware differing f-numbers

**** ******** *** ************'* *** **** **** **********, ********** **** basic ***** ***** *** ******* ************ ** ** ***** .*** lux ****** **** .* ***.

Sens ** *** *** *******

****-**** ********* * ********* **** *** **** *******. *** ****** the **** ** "*****", *** ****** *******, **** **** ********** (2x, **, ***, ***.) ****** ********** ***** */*** ** ******* the ********* ******* *****.

*** *******, *** **** ***** ***** ***** * ******** ******* illumination ** "**** ****-**." **** *********** ******* ** ** ********** 8.5 ****** (***/*** = *.**) ******** ****, ***** ***** ****** in ******* ******** ** ****** *******.

*** **** ** **** *** *** *** ***** *** ****** and *** *********. ******.

Color ** */*

******* **** ******* ********** *** ******* (*** */* *******) **** often **** * *** *******, *** ***** ** ***** ****, the ****** ** **********. **** ********** ** *** ** ********* performance ** ********** **** *** ** ******* ** ***** ***** the ** *** ****** ****** ** ***** ****. ******* *********** are ***** ***********, ** ** *** ******** *****, ***** **** list ********** ******* ************ ***** */**** ** ***** **** (************* 10x ******).

minimum illumination specs

***** ***** *** ** ******* ********* ***** ** *****, *** increases *** ********* **********. ****** ***** *********** *** ******** *** has ******* *********** ** ***** *** ********** ******* **** ******, as **** ** **** ********** ***** **** * ******* ********** camera ** *** **** *****.

color vs monochrome

IRE ******

*** *********** ** ******* *** ****** ******* *** *** *** ********** in **. *** ** * ******* ** *** ******** ***** in ** ****** ***** ******, ****** ***** ********* ***** *******. Since ** ******* ** *** ******* ****** ****** ** ***** full **********, ** ** * **** ******.

* *** ************* ***** **** ** ** **** ******, ******* different ******* ************ ****** *** ********* **** (**** ***** ** and **). *******, ***** ** ** ******* *** ************* *** testing **** ***, ** ********* ***** *** ***** ******* ************ spec ** ***** ***** (********* **), *** ******** ***** ********.

ire level in specs

******* ** ****** ******* **** ***** ** *** **** ***, almost *** ** **** **** ********** **, ** **** ***** IRE ****** ***** ** ******* ** ** ****** *******, **** would *** **** * **********.

Beware ** *********

**** ************* (******* *******) ******* ** ******* ********** ** ******* "0 ***, ** *********" *** ***** ***-********** ** *******. **** they *** ****** ** "** *** *** *** *** **** own ** ***** ******, *** ******* **** ** *****." **** is ********* **** *** ****/* ********* ********** ******* ** ******** ****** ***'* *** ** *********** units.

Super *** ***** ********

** **** *****, ** *** ********* *** ****** ********** ******** that *** ******* **** **** ** *** *****, **** *** 'best' ***** ******** **** **** ****** ** ***** *** ******** in ***** **** **********.

**** *** ******* ** *** **** *** ***** ** (*) advances ** *** ***** ***** ********** **** ********* *** (*) as **** ****** ******* *** ****. ******* *** *** *********** process *** ******* ***** ******* ** ********** ***** ********* ****** the ****** ********. ********, */*" ***** ******* **** ******* ** a ***** *** ***** *******, ******** **** ***** **********, ******* low ***** ****** *********** ** *** **** (*.*., *** ******* */*"************ */*"****** *****). *******, ***** *** * *** **** ***** ****** IP ******* (*.*. *' ** ****) **** ******* ** ******** low ***** ****** ****** ** *** ****** ****** (*.*.,****'* ** **** ****).

Practical *** ******

**** ***** *** ******* ************ ************** ** ****+ ******* ** its ****** ******. **** ****, ** ***** ***** ********* ******:

  • .*** *** *** *****
  • .** *** *** *****
  • .* *** *****

0.00X *** *** *****

*********************** ******* ************ ** ***** ********* ***** ************ *********** ***** ******'* *** ***** ***********. ** some *****, ***** ****** *** *** ************** ****** **** ** **** *******, ***** ** ******, ** ** ****** *************.

***** *** ************ ****** ** **** ******** *** ********* **** as *****'* ** *********** **** (***** ******* ****** ******* ********* due ** **** *******,*** *** **** *******) *** *******'* *******, * *** ********* ****** **** * very **** **.* ****.

** *****, ** ******* ** ************* ****** ****** ***** *.** lux, ** *********** ****** ******* ***** *****.

0.0X ***

** ********* ******* ** ***** **** ***** *** ***** ******* *** ********* specified. **** ***** ******** *** *** ***** ********** **** ** Axis' ************************,******* ***-**** *** ***-****, *******'* *** *** ***-***** *** ***-*****, ****** ** *** "******" ************** *** ***** ******* *** low ***** ***********.

**** ** *** ** *** ** ************* *** *********** *********** at ***** ******. *** *******, **** *** ******** *.**-**-** *** Axis ***** *** ********* ** *.** ***. *******,*** ********* *** ******** ******'* *********** ** **** ***** **** ** the *****.

0.X ***

******* ********* ** **** ******** ********* **** ** *** *****. **** ******** ******** **** previous ********** ******* ***** *** ***** *********** *** **** ********** by *** ********** ******. ************, **** ***** **** ***** ****/**** F-stop ****** ***** **** ****** ****** ** *** *+ *** range *** ********* ****.

**** **** ** ***** ******* **********, ** *** ***** ** a *** *******, ******* ********* ** **** ***** **** ****** not ******* ********* ***********.

1+ ***

******* **** ******* ************ ******* ***** * ******* ** **** ** **** ******** *** ***** **********. ***** ratings *** **** ****** ***** ***** **** ***** **** ********* (such ** ******* *********** **********) *** ********* ****** **** ** ********** ***-**************** **-*****/***.

IR ************ *** *** ****** - *** ******

**** ******* ***** **** / ******** ******** ********** **.

******* ** ****, *** ******* ** *** ********* ***** ** them, ***** ***** ******* **** ***** *** ********. ** ** possible ** **** ** ******* ** ******* *** ** *********** but **** ** ********* *** ****. ** ****, **** ** cameras ****** * *** ****** ** * ***, ***** **** do *** **** *****.

** ********** *** ****** ** ***** ******** *** ** ******* when ** ** ********, ********* ****** ***** **** (***** **** IR ** **, *** ****** **** ** ***** *** *****). See **** ******* *****:

**** *** ************* ******* **** *** **** ******* ** *** other *******. ********, ***** ** ******* **** ***** *** ************, many, ********** ***** **** ****, *** **** ** *** *****, relying ** ***** *****-** ** ************* ** **** *** ***** bright (*.*.,*** ********** ****** ***** *******).

What ** **

** *** ***** ** ********* ** ***, *** ** *** want **, *** *** **** ******* ******* ************, **** ********** the ********* ************* ********:

"******* ************ ** *.** *** ** */*** *******, ** *********** allowed."

*** ********* *** **** ** **** ******* ********* ** *.* lux ** ****** *** ****** ****** ****** *** ** *** light, **, ** *****, *** *** ****** ***** *******. *******, if *** ******* ********* ***** **** ****, **** .***, *** significantly ******** *** ****** ** ********* ****-******* *** ***** ******* that *** ************** *********.

*******, **** **** ** ******* *** "*/*** *******, ** **** shutter *******" ** ******* ************* ********* ************** **** *** ******* gamed *** ******* ** ********* *********** ****** ****.

****** ****,****** **** **** *********** *** ******* *** ***** ************ ******* *** **** ******** to *** *** **** ** ***** ** **** ****** / light ******.

[****: **** ***** *** ********** ******* ** **** *** *** updated ** ******** **** *** **** ** ******* ******** ** integrated ** ***** *** *********** ** ***** *** ***** *******.]

Comments (13)

Great article ! Every manufacturer puts all kinds of tricks to give spectacular demos at their boot, but once you test the cameras in the lab, you see the real performance ! And there's a big difference in behaviour, also according to the lenses you use. Same camera with same settings, but varying brands and types of lenses also give a wide variety of performance. Maybe this can be an interesting test as well.

The main issue with lenses and low light is variance in f stop. Higher f number, less light passes.

We actually tested / demonstrated this in our f stop tutorial:

That said, this only is possible with cameras where you can swap out lenses, which are in the minority in the industry today (most commonly box format).

With all of the trickery that manufacturer’s use to hide their products’ true low light level capabilities, I have given up specifying low light performance. Even using performance recommendations like you have suggested are challenging because the manufactures don’t publish all of the detail needed to properly analyze the camera’s performance. Until there are some meaningful standards and the products are tested by an independent testing agency (like IPVM), I will stick to specifying a few cameras that I have confidence in.

Rob, I think that is a solid approach.

We put out those performance recommendations because some organizations are not allowed to specify specific models (procurement rules, etc.). Our goal with our recommendation is primarily to stop unrealistic lux rating specs (like camera must be 0.00001 lux) that reward the bad actors and screw good products.

John, this is vey helpful in situations like ours. I work for a university and everything over a certain price has to go through the procurement (bid) process or be gotten from a recognized "sole source vendor". Specific language is important. Thanks.

Usually when i need to value cameras sensitivity i check the illumination level necessary to form the full signal at Gain=1, Texp=1/50, if possible turn off gamma correction and auto-iris just in case. mostly it is in the range 10 - 40 lux (F1.4) easy to measure. the behaviour in other conditions is very predictable.

#1, yes, once you have the camera you can definitely use techniques to measure / assess.

The big challenge for many specifiers is knowing before buying / getting a camera.

All above is valid but there are additional factors that also need to be considered.

1) As shown at the beginning of this article video noise is a major factor in the usability of the picture . The A, B, and C show this clearly with "C" having the best signal to noise ratio ( S/N). Manufacturers again distort their specs based on S/N by giving the sensitivity spec with "AGC ON" and/or "Sense Up ON" then the S/N with "AGC OFF" and/ or "Sense Up OFF" obvious that specs. should be done with the same settings.

2) The lux rating for the scene is given but critically no manufacturer speaks about the reflectivity of the scene. So they measure with a white card or other highly reflective object. Then the installer puts the camera viewing a parking lot that is black asphalt with virtually no reflectivity.

3) The old IRE was a valid measurement for surveillance and broadcast. It, combined with the S/N values, gave a more accurate picture of how a camera performed. The 30% number with a high S/N would indicate a good minimum usable picture. It would be nice if there was way to duplicate this with IP cameras and manufacturers using this as a standard ( We can dream can't we).

4) In actuality the best way to standardize light measurement and take the lens "f" stop and reflectivity out of the equation is to use a measurement of the light at the faceplate of the sensor as the specification. A number of manufactures tried to implement this many years ago ( analog cameras) and it fell to the wayside because this would keep all honest and many did not want to be honest.

5) At the end of the day the user is the victim of all the specification manipulation as many times they buy product that does not work in their application. The single best way for the user to protect themselves is to have an onsite demo with competitors doing side by side before they buy the system.

4) In actuality the best way to standardize light measurement and take the lens "f" stop and reflectivity out of the equation is to use a measurement of the light at the faceplate of the sensor as the specification.

I agree, measurement at the sensor takes the reflectivity out of the equation. How do you take the lens out of the equation, though? Measuring uncollimated light doesn't seem accurate.

a measurement of the light at the faceplate of the sensor as the specification.

Some manufacturers will just pass along the minimum illumination from the imager supplier. But that does not help since those numbers are not any more realistic or helpful for an end user buyer nor will it help compare to others who use different approaches.

There were and maybe still are light meters that accept a C or CS lens and have correct spacing to measure the light at the back of the lens which is equal to the faceplate.

You can always make one:

You of course are correct about manufactures using the sensor manufacturers specs. In fact this goes even further. Much like Brian pointed out the other day about the OEM China's makers specs being used by the seller verbatim, some camera manufactures just copy specs from the higher class manufacturers and put them on their spec. sheets so they are comparable.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
UK: Private Video Surveillance Complaints Down Since GDPR on Jan 09, 2019
The arrival of the GDPR on May 25, 2018, brought fears the law would spark a massive increase in privacy complaints about security camera use....
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
2019 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 14, 2019
The new IP Networking Book 2019 is a 285 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
Arecont Costar Layoffs on Jan 14, 2019
Arecont Vision, a Costar Company, has laid off more than 10% of their workforce in a move the company described to IPVM as a result of "important...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact