License Plate Capture 4K Test

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 11, 2016

License plate capture is one of the most popular surveillance applications. IPVM has done extensive testing in this area already including:

With 4K becoming widespread, how does this impact LPR performance. Can wider areas be captured? Does the increased resolution really help?

We tested 4K cameras across low, mid, and high price points, with built in IR and external to see how they compare to 1080p for license plate capture.

The cameras / products we tested were:

We tested the cameras in low speed and faster speed scenes, both day and night, shown here:

Inside we answer these questions and more:

  • Can I capture plates across a wider area with 4K than 1080p?
  • What settings must be changed for proper capture?
  • How does nighttime performance compare to 1080p?

******* ***** ******* ** one ** *** **** popular ************ ************. **** has **** ********* ******* in **** **** ******* including:

**** ** ******** **********, how **** **** ****** LPR ***********. *** ***** areas ** ********? **** the ********* ********** ****** help?

** ****** ** ******* ****** low, ***, *** **** price ******, **** ***** in ** *** ******** ** see *** **** ******* to ***** *** ******* plate *******.

*** ******* / ******** we ****** ****:

** ****** *** ******* in *** ***** *** faster ***** ******, **** *** and *****, ***** ****:

****** ** ****** ***** questions *** ****:

  • *** * ******* ****** across * ***** **** with ** **** *****?
  • **** ******** **** ** changed *** ****** *******?
  • *** **** ********* *********** compare ** *****?

[***************]

*******

** **** ******, ** cameras ******** *** ********** over ***** *** ******* plate *******. *** *********** of ****** ******* ****** required *** **'* ****** low ***** *********** (**** with ****** ** ************) reduces ** ********** *** advantages ** ********** **********, with *** *********:

** ************ **** ****** lighting (******** ** ** illumination), ** ******* *** allow ******* **** * wider ****, ** ** twice *** ********** ***, reducing *** ****** ** cameras ****** *** ******** lanes.

*******, ** ***** **** advantage ** **********, ** the ****** ** ******** IR ************ ******** *** nighttime **** *** ************ likely ********* *** **** of ***** ********, ***** cost, ***** ********** *******.

Key ********

** ****** ** ****** was **** ** ******* plates ***** ******* ******** (1/30s ******* ***), *** or *****, **** ** slow ******. *** ****** 1080p ******* **** **** and **** ***** (******** H3 *******, ******* ***-****, Hikvision **-*******-*, ***** ********) were **** ** ******* during *** *** ***** defaults.

**** *** ********* ** cameras **** **** ** reliably ******* ****** ****** the *** ** ****** from *-** *** ***** */***** shutter. ********* ******* ******** 1/1000s ******* *** ********* gain, ********** ** ******* speed. 

***** ** ***-***** *** unreliable *** ******* ********** of ******* *** **** settings, ******* *****, *** or *****.

** **** *** ******* scenes, **** *** ********* 4K/12MP ****** **** **** to ******* ****** **** roughly ***** *** ********** FOV ** * ***** model ** *** ******, 60-80' **** (********* ** mounting *****). 

** *****, ** ******** no *** ***** **** 1080p *** ** ****** low ***** ***********, **** with ****** ******* ******** IR (***** ****** ***** IP). 

***** ** ** ** both *** ***** *** Panasonic ** ******* *** too **** ** ******* proper ************, **** ** slow ****** ***** ******** FOVs, *** ** ~**' target ********, **** ****** specified ** ***** ** both *******.

*******

****** ******* *** ****** in **** ****: 

The ****

*** ** ******* ****** were ******** ** ********* various ******** ** ** options: *** **** ********** IR (*****), *** ***** (Axis), **** *** ********** IR (*********). ** ****** these ****** ******* *** 1080p ******* ***-****, ************** of ***** *** ***** models.

******* **** ****** ***** both ***** ** ** for ***** ***** ******** it (***** *** *********), and ** ******** ** illuminator, ********* ** ***** **. *** *****'* *************** lenses ******* *** ************ pattern ** ****** ***** the *** *** **** scene.

******* **** ****** ** two ****** ** **** low ***** *******, **** about *-** ***, *** higher *****, **-** ***, using **** ****** **** (1-2 *****, ~**' ****) and ***** (** ** 80').

Results ********

** **** *****, ** review ******* ** *** testing, ******** **** ******* capture, ******* *********** ******* default ******** *** **** shutter, ** **** ** the ***** *** ******** when ***** ** *******.

** **** ****** *****, we ****** ****** ******** during ********* *******. 

No ******* ***** ******* ********

** ** ****** **** able ** ******* ****** using ******* ********, *** or *****, ********** ** speed, ****** ***** ********** models, **** ** *** 1080p ******* ** **** test *** ******* ** our ******* ***** ******* ******** 2014.

**** ***** ***** *** 4K ******* *** ******* 1080p ***** ******* ******** at *** ***** (~*****) during *** ***. ** show *** **** ** the *** **** **** camera ** ********** *** motion **** ********, ** well ** * **** of *** ******* ***** to **** *** ***** of **********, **** **** the ***** ******* ****** capturing *** *****.

** *****, ****** *** simply ****** *** ** taillights, ******* ** ****** 1/30s ******* ********, *** noisy *** ** ********* gain.

Fast ******* *******

** ***** ** ******** capture ****** ** *** speed, ******* ***** ****** to ** **** ** 1/1000s ** *** ** cameras, **** ***** **** setting, *** ***** ** camera *** ***** ****** to ******* ****** ********. By ********, *** ***** Samsung ***-**** ******** ******** plates ***** */**** ******* at **** ******* ****** (<20 ***), *** */**** at ****** ******.

*** ******* ** */***** shutter ***** *** ***** below, ***** **** *** faster ***** **** ***** (though ********** **** ** slow ******).

*****

** *****, ******* ** the ** ******* *** proper ******* *** **** difficult. **** **** ********** shutter ***** ** */*****, plates **** ********* ** discern *** ** ***** and ***** *****.

** ****** ***** ****** and ******* *******, ** reduced ********* **** ********, setting *** ** "***" in *** ********* ******, and * *** ** 24dB ** *** **** P1428-E. **** ******* ******** the *****, *** ********** blooming *** ******* ******* noise, ******** ****** ** be ******** ********.

** ****** ****** (**-** MPH), capture *** **** ********, seen ** *** ********** below. *** ***** ** camera *** ****** ** capture ****** ** **** speed, **** ***** ********** so ******* **** *** barely **********. ******* ******* in *** ********* ** camera, ****** ********** *** still *******. 

Wider **** ******** ** ****** *****

** ******* ******, ** were **** ** ******* plates ****** ***** **** with *** ** *******, up ** ***** ** wide. 

*** *******, ** **** able ** ******* ****** across * ~**' *** using *** **** *** Panasonic ** *******, ******** to ~**' ** *** Samsung *****:

FOV ***** **** ** *****

****** ******* ******, ***** **** were ****** *** ******** at *****. **** **** using *** ****** ***** illuminator **** * **** angle (** ******) ****, ******* were ****** *** ********* enough **** ***** */***** exposure ** ******* **** contrast ** *** *****.

** ** ******** **** adding **** ** ************ to *** *****, ** closer ** *** ******* point, *** ******* ***********, but *** ***** ******* (in **** ***** ** much ** ** **** than * ******) ****** outweighs *** ******** ** using * ****** ** camera ******* ** ******** 1080p ** *****.

Integrated ** *** ****

** ***** *** ********** IR ** **** *** ***** and ********* ******* *** weak ** ******* ********** illumination *** *******, ********* a **** ******** ******** IR *********** *** ****** capture.

*** *******, ** **** scene, using */***** *******, ******** IR *** *** **** at ~**' ****** ******** to ******* ****** ************ to ******** *** ******* reduction ** *****, ******* its ********* *** ** range. *******, ***** *** Raytec ** ***** **** a ~** ****** ****, the ***** ** **** illuminated *** ****** ******* (right).

Test **********

******* **** ****** ***** varying ******* ****** *** gain ******** ** ***** above. ****** **** *** to *.***, *** ***** rate (** *** ** Axis/Samsung, ** ** *********, and ** ** *****), with *-***** ******** ******** framerate.

*** ********* ********/******** ******** were ****:

  • **** *****-*: *.**.*.*
  • ***** ***-********: *.***.****.*.*, *****: 2015-02-03 
  • ********* **-*******: *.**
  • ******* ***-****: *.*********
  • *********** **********: *.*.*.*****

Comments (7)

Thanks for this enlightening er - illuminating test IPVM. Which leads me to ask how well do you think any of the 360 or 180 degree 4 & 6MP "corrected" devices perform at night - outside - unaided without IR? One of my competitors is in love with these and loves to tell clients 'All you need is one on each corner'. I'm sure with a super slow shutter he's producing beautiful static images.

One of my competitors is in love with these and loves to tell clients 'All you need is one on each corner'. I'm sure with a super slow shutter he's producing beautiful static images.

When you just want to read the plates of parked cars in a parking lot, the slow shutter would be acceptable. Even in that case though I doubt the resolution would be sufficient for more than a few dozen cars...

Got some installers in love with 4K 360 ° in pendant position with embedded IR and factory settings..., placed at each corner of residential buildings to cover parking ... it' s perfect for contextual day/night monitoring to cover a great FOV without dead areas, only for detection and recognition because it does away objects.. And to identify plates, they are also using dedicated 1080p LPR cameras (specific firmware with Shutter & Gain control limits, no Dnr, no WDR and even Black/White switch at 600 lux !) So as we say in France, it's very difficult to get "Fromage et Dessert " with the same device, better use two.

Cameras don't like Sunrise / Sunset :

the worst periods of the day for all cameras (2MP or 12MP) are just before sunrise and after sunset, when cameras are in color mode / Day profile... but with very low lights too much light to remain in Black/White, 5 lux, 10 lux... (sunrise) or the contrary, no more sunlights but still too much light to switch to BW...and no IR !

So best is often to force the camera to switch BEFORE the sensor decides to, so you can use IR external proj with less noise and a faster shutter

Some vendors can, some others can't , so you need an external light sensor to remote control the night profile.

Some vendors can, some others can't...

And some vendors don't...They dont ever switch out of IR mode.  

This seems the most consistent way to handle it, if a bit pricey, if your camera is going to be dedicated to the task.

Ethan,

I may have missed it, but I am wondering about also the throughput numbers of the video streams, comparing each manufacturer. I know your focus was more about the single best image that was captured, but we would usually be recording the entire video event. I would think these cameras and images have to be require a large amount of storage.

John,

Would love to see you use the Plate Smart LPR cameras and software for this test and see how that product compares to the units you tested.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,438 reports, 865 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Tiandy Super Starlight Cameras Tested on Apr 30, 2020
Tiandy is taking aim at China competitors Dahua and Hikvision, with a new...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the...
Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 27, 2020
Remotely accessing surveillance systems is key in 2020, with more and more...
HLC Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Uniview, Vivotek on Mar 02, 2020
Highlight Compensation (HLC) claims to reduce the effects of strong light...
Integrated IR Camera Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 30, 2020
The best and worst cameras tested in this IPVM shootout showed major...
Vivotek LPR Camera Tested on Apr 15, 2020
Vivotek has historically sold license plate capture cameras but not LPR. Now,...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Cheap Camera Problems at Night on Feb 19, 2020
Cheap cameras generally have problems at night, despite the common perception...
IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan / US startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System Tested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to...
Multi-Imagers Added to IPVM Camera Calculator on Jun 15, 2020
IPVM has added multi-imager cameras to the Camera Calculator, supporting this...
Camera Course Summer 2020 - Last Chance on Jul 18, 2020
This is your last chance to register for the Summer 2020 Camera Course. This...
TVT / InVid White Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Mar 18, 2020
With mega China manufacturers Dahua and Hikvision facing both bans and human...
FLIR A Series Temperature Screening Cameras Tested on Jun 04, 2020
FLIR is one of the biggest names in thermal and one of the most conservative....
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30...

Recent Reports

VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
Motorola Solutions Acquires Pelco on Aug 03, 2020
Motorola Solutions has acquired Pelco, pledging to bring blue back and make...
False: Verkada: "If You Want To Remote View Your Cameras You Need To Punch Holes In Your Firewall" on Jul 31, 2020
Verkada falsely declared to “3,000+ customers”, “300 school districts”, and...