Fraud Lawsuit: Ex-Latch Execs "Confidential Witnesses" Against Latch
Four former sales executives for Latch are cooperating with an investor class action against the company and have provided detailed allegations about “pervasive” schemes to inflate revenue using letters of intent, misstated sale prices, and channel stuffing.
If these allegations are true, the risk of criminal charges is real.
In this Research note, we examine the legal allegations in-depth and assess the risk for Latch.
Executive *******
********* ***** ************** ** ***. **, **** ******* Latch ********** **** “************ *********” *** formerly ****** ** ***** ********** *** the *******, ********* *** *** ********* left **** **** ** **** **** “because ** *** ************* **** ********* LOIs ** *****.”
** ** ******* *** ****** ********** to *** ********* ** * ********** class ****** ******* * ******* ** this ******. ***** **** *** *** named ** *** *********, *** ********* will ****** ** ******* *** *** have ** ******* ** *****.
*** ******* **** ******** ** *** plaintiffs **** ******** *** **** *********** allegations *** **** ***** ******* ** fraudulent **********. *** *** ****** **** already ******** ***** ** *********** ********* ** ****, *** *** ******* ********* ******** two ********** ******* ** ******* ******* by ************ ****** ******** ** ********' warehouses (**** ***** ** “******* ********”) and ************ **** ******.
*** ** *** ****** ********** ********* that **** **%-**% ** *****’* ***** American ******* *** ******** **********, ******* that **%-**% *** **** **** ************ reported.
******** ***** ** ********** ******.******** ******** *** ***** ********, *** latest ********* ******** **** *** *******’* legal ******** *** *** **** ****. Turning *** ******* ****** *** ********* its ***** ***** ** **** ********* than ***********.
** ************ **** **** ** ********* ****. *******, ** **** ****, *** claims **** *** **** *******, ******* the ********* *** *****.
**********
******** *** ****-******* **** ************,***** *********** * ********** **** *** years. ********** ****** ******* * **** ************* ** **** ****, ***** ****** to **** ******* ************ *** **** through ******** ****** ** *******.
** **** ********* **** *** ** its ********* ************* **** ** **** ***** **** to ** ******** "** * ****** of ******** ******* ************ *** ****** relating ** *** ****** ** ***** the ******* ********** *******."
*** ******* *** *** *** ***** restated ********** ** ******* ********** ***** Q1 ****. ** * ****** ** failing ** **** *.*. ********** *** Exchange ********** ****** ************,** *** ******** **** *** ******. *** ***** ***** *** ******* around $* *** ***** ***** ***-****, down ~**% **** ***** $** *** share ** ********* ****.
************, ***** **** *** *******'* ***** accounting ******* *** *** ******* ***, Barry *********, **** ****** *** ** January ****. **** ******* ******** *** been ******* ** ***** ** ********** ***** ** ****.******** *** ******* *** *** ****** executives ******** ** ******** ******** **** investors. **** ****:
- ***** ****** ** *******, $*** ******* Loss *** *** ****
- ***** *** ****** "**** *********" **** 38% "*** ****" ******** *******
- ***** *********** *** ******** ********, ****** Ex-Employees
- ***** ***** ** ***** ***** ***** Admitting "******** ****** *** ******** **************"
- ***** *** ** ****** ***, **** Layoffs
- *****, ***, *** *** ****; ******* Fraud
- ***** **** ********** *** ********** ********
Key ******
*** ******* ********** ***** ****** ********* was ***** ** ********* ******* ***** on ****** ** *** "******* *** entities **** ********* ** ********* ******** Latch ****** ***** ******* *** **, 2021, *** ****** **, ****."
********** ******* **** *****, ************, ********* ***** ********, *** ****** ********** ***** *********"**** ** ****** ** ** **** a ****** ** ********** ***** ***/** misleading ********** ***** *****'* ********, **********, and *******."
************, *** ********* ******* ***** ******* of ******** ******* *********** ******* **** and ****:
- ***** ***-******* ******* ** ****** ("****")
- ****** ******** ** ******* ********** ******* a ****** ** ******* ("******* ********")
- ********** ******* ***** ************
*** **** ********* ** *** **** has **** ******* **** ******** ****** Brennan ** *** ******* ********* ** VP *** ************* ** ******* ** Gersec *****, **************-***** ********** ******.
Confidential *********
*** **** ************ ********* ********** ** the ********* *** ********* ** *******:
- Confidential ******* * ("CW1") initially worked as a Channel ********* at Latch at the beginning of the Class Period and then became Regional **** ********* ** ******* *****.
- Confidential ******* * ("CW2") was vice ********* ** ******* *********** ** ***** during the Class Period. He first joined the Company in August 2018, initially as channel account manager, and also worked in the roles of general manager, Canada and senior director of channel development.
- Confidential ******* * (“CW3”) was director ** ******** ******* ************ and field sales at Latch from January 2018 until July 2019...Later, from July 2021 until March 2022, CW3 was a Latch senior solutions engineer.
- Confidential ******* * (“CW4”) was Latch’s vice ********* ** *****: ***** ******* from February 2020 until June 2022. [Emphasis Added.]
*** ********* *** "****** ********* ** Latch’s ******** ***** *** ******* *********** process" *** **** ********** **** ****** Latch ******** "************ *** **** ** several ********* ******* *** ******* ** premature ********* ******* *** ******** ******** sales **** ***** *** *** ******** completed," *** ********* *******.
Other ***** **********
*** ********* ******** ** ** ****** closely **** ***** ****** ***** ********** who *** ***** ** *** *********. They ******* *********** ******* ******* ***** ***, ********** ********* ** ***** ***** ********, *** *********** ********* ******* *** *******.
**** ******* *** ** *** ** the ***** *********** *** **** *** not ***** ** *** ******** *** comment.
Channel ********
***** ** *** *********, ***, ***, and ***, ******** *********** ***** ******* stuffing. *** *** "********* ***** ** find ******* ******** *** ***** *********** in ******* ********," *** ********* *******.
*** ********* *********:
In ***** ** *** ****, CW3 met with Defendant Mitchell, Ali Hussain, and Scott Anderson, and told **** **** ***** ******** ********* **** *** ***********. Mitchell told CW3 directly that as a startup, Latch had to take risks in how it approached business. Unable ** ********* *** *******, *** **** *** *******.
*** ******** ** ***** ** **** 2021 ** * ****** ********* ********. CW3 ****** **** ***** ** *********, he ***** **** ***** ***, **** the *******’* ***** ******* *******,who **** *** **** ***** *** ******* ** *** ******** ********* ******* ** *** ***** ******. [Emphasis Added.]
*******, *** ********* ** ******* *******-******** practices ** *** ******* ***** ** returned, ********* ** *** *********. ** left *** ******* ***** ** ***** 2022.
***, *** *** **** ********* ** sales *** ***** ******* ***** **** 2022, **** "**** **** ***** ******* hardware **** *** ********* ** * distribution ********* ** **********, ******** ** as ******* ******* *** ******** ** a ******** ** * **** **** buyer," ********* ** *** *********. *** filing *******:
** ****, ********* ** ***, *****offered ******* ******** ******** ********* to take *** ******** *** **** **** ** ***** ********* *******. In CW4’s experience, only 60 to 70% of Latch’s recognized North America revenue represented shipped product, and only 30 ** **% *** ******, ******** ********** *******. [Emphasis Added.]
Latch ********* ******* *******
*** **** ********* ******** ******* ******** through * ******* ****** *** ***** Preferred ******* *******, ** ***. *** program ********** ******** *****-***** ******** **** hardware ** ***** ******* ** ****** quick **********. *** ********* ******* **** in *******:
*****recognized *** ******* **** **** ******** ** **** ** ** *** ******* to the channel partner. But when new orders came in, they began stopping channel partners from shipping from this inventory, instead placing *** ****** so that they could ********* **** *******, ******* *** ******** **** ******* **** ** ********. [Emphasis Added.]
Whiz *****
*** ******** ******* ***** * ******** partner ************ ******** *****, * *******-***** ********* ** ******** for *********** *********, ***** ********* ******** channel ********. *** ********* *******:
**** **** ***** **August ** ********* **** *** *** ***** ********** **** *** ******** ** ***** ** **** ****. In exchange for a loan from Latch to Whiz Cribs, Whiz ***** ******** ***** ******* ** ******** ********* ** ****. According to CW3, even as these were consignment sales, Latch *********** ********** ** ******* *** ******** ** **** ******* ** **** *****. CW3 recalls that Defendant Mitchell was directly involved with the Whiz Cribs deal. [Empahsis Added.]
* ******* **** *** **** ***** no ****** ******** ********** ***** *****. A ***** ****** ****** *** *** company ****** ** ****** ******** ** it. **** ********* ** ******* *************** from *** ******* ** ******** *** did *** ******* * *****.
Misreported **** ******
*** **** ******** *********** ***** ** additional ****** ** ***** ***** ***** allegedly **** **** ****** *********** ** inflate *******. ************, ***** ***** ****** the **** **** ***** **** * channel ******* ** ** *** **** as *** *** *******, **** ****** Latch **** ******** ******* **** ** sold *** ******* ** *** *******, the ********* *******.
** ******, *** ********* *******: "** Latch **** * **** ** * channel ******* *** $*** *** *** channel ******* **** ** ** *** end **** *** $***, ***** ***** record $*** ** *******."
*** ********* ******* *******:
*** **** ******* ********* ** *** CFO ******** ****the ******* ***** *** ********* **** ******* ******* ** *** *** **** *** ******* *** **** *****, but the finance function employees rebuffed him, stating that Latch’s *********** ** * ******* *******’* **** ***** ** *** *** **** ***** complied with accounting principles and policies. [Emphasis Added.]
LOI ***********
*** ********* **** *******, ** ********** reported ** ****, **** *** ******* also ********** ********** ********** "******* ** intent," ** ****, ** *****.
*** **** *** ******* **** *********** to ***** ********* ** ****** **** up ***** ***** ***** ****. *** former ********* **** **** **** **** about **%-**% ** **** **** ********* into ****** *****.
"**** *** ***** ********* *****, ***** recognized ******** ** ******* ******* ** LOIs," *** ********* ******.
What's ** ***** *** *****
** * *******, *** *********** *********** in *** ******* ********* ***** *** chance **** ***** *** ********** **** to *** * ******** ******** ** settlement. ** ***** *** *****, *** details ** *** ******* ***** ******* could **** ******* ********* **** *********** officials ** *** *.*. ********** *** Exchange ********** *** *** ******* **********.
** *** *********** ** *** ******* complaint *** ****, **** ***** ****** the *********** ** *****'* ******** *********** that *** ********** ******** **** *** result ** ************* ******. ******, *** legal ****** ****** * ******* ** several ********** ******* ******* *** **** multiple ***** — ***** ***** ******* not **** ***** *** **** ******** liability *** *** *********** ********.
*************** *** ***** *** ***** ********** in *** *******, ********* ****** *** Schoenfelder, ****** *** ***** ********, *** former ******* *** ***** ********* *** not ***** ** ******** *** ******* from ****. * ************ *** **** estate ********** **** ******* ******, ***** sponsored *** **** ***** **** ***** public, ******** ** *******.
Past ********** ***** *****
** ** *** **** *** ******* the *** ** *** ** ************* Latch ** *** ********** **** ********** or ********-******* ****** ******* *** ******** don't ********* ******* ******* ******. ****** companies ********* ******** ******* **** **** received ********* **** ******* ******** ** quarterly ********* ***********. ***** *** *** submitted * ********* ********** ** *** SEC ***** ** ****.
*** ** ** *** ******* *** current ** ****** ********** ** **** private *** ****** ********* ** ** sanctioned ** ********** *** **** ********** charged *** **** ** ****** ** connection **** ********** *****.
*** *******, ****** ***** **** *** Lay *** **** ******** **** ********* of ******** ******* ** *** ***** stemming **** *** ****** *******'* *** of ********** ****** ** ******* **** and ********* *******. *** **** ***** awaiting ******** ** **** *** ************** ** ***** ** ******.
**** ********, *** ****** *** ** Silicon ****** **** ******* *************** ****** ** ***** ****** ***** ******* ******* ** *********** revenue *** *** *******, ***** ** used ** ***** **** **** $*** million ** ******* **** *********. ** faces ** ** ** ***** ** prison ** * ********** ********* *** December ****.
** ******** ****, *** ****** *** of ******* ****** **** ****************** * **-**** ************ * ****** ** ******* ******* through ******* ********.
Turnaround *************
********** ** ******* *********** ******** **** action, *** *********** ****** ** *** amended ***** ****** ********* ******* **** Latch's ***** ******* ***'* ** ***** or **** ** *******. *** ********* negative ********* ***** ********* **** ********'* effort ** ********** *** ******* ** a ******** ******** ******** ***** *** name ****.***.
What ***** ****
***** *** ****** ********** ***** ** defendants ** *** ***** ****** ******* may **** ** ****** ** *** complaint ** * ****** ****** *** judge ** ******* ** ** ***** grounds. ** *** ******-**-******* *****, ******* judges ****** ******* ******* *** ****** are "*********" *** ** *** **** on *** ****** ** *** ****.
** *** ******* ********* ******** * dismissal *******, *** ******* ***** ******* to ********* *** ***** ********** *********** from **** ***** ** *********** *** trial. ** **** ********, *********** ** the ************ ********* ***** ** *** complaint ***** ****** ** ********* ** obtain ***** ********* ***** ****.
******: ******* *** ***** ***** * motion ** ******* ** ***. **, 2023. ** ***-**** ******************** *** ******, *** ******* ******* made ********* ********* ******* *********** ***** in *** *********.
*** ********, *** *******'* ******* ****** the ********* "***** ********" ** *** over *** ******* ***** ******* ** before *** **** ****** ******* ** was * "********* *******."
*****'* ******* **** ****** **** *** plaintiff ****'* **** ********** ****** ********* about **** *** ********* ** *** financials. (*******, ***** ****'* ***** *** restated ********** ** ********, ** ********* can't **** *** ***** **** ****.)
"*** *** ********* **** **** *****’* forthcoming *********** *** ******** ** ** with *** ***** ******* ** *** Amended *********, ** ******* ** **** unrelated ******* *********** ********," *** ******* argued.
*** ******** ******* ********* *****'* *******: that *** ****** **** *********** "** good *****," *** ****** ** ************* management.
*** ******* ********* ** **** ******** in *****, ******** * **** *** not **** ********* ***. ** **** continue ** ****** *** **** ** it ********.