Hikvision DarkfighterX Vs Darkfighter PTZ Tested

By Ethan Ace, Published on Apr 26, 2018

Hikvision has focused on improving low-light performance for PTZs, an area that has traditionally been a problem, even more so than fixed cameras, due to the challenges of higher F stops and long-range varifocal lenses of PTZs.

Two of Hikvision's most notable efforts are (1) their Darkfighter PTZ line and (2) more recently, their DarkfighterX, the "next level of surveillance", that unlike any major manufacturer, uses 2 sensors, as Hikvision explains the "IR sensor delivers image brightness, the other sensor for visible light guarantees vivid color."

We bought and tested the Darkfigher X DS-2DF8225IH-AELW against Hikvision's Darkfighter line (the DS-2DF8236IX-AELW) to see how this technology works and which one is better in which ways.

Inside, we share our full test results, including:

  • Wide angle vs zoom details captured
  • Low light color performance (in sub 1 lux 'no light' and in 2 - 7 lux ambient / 'urban' lighting')
  • Monochrome vs. color performance differences
  • Focus issues
  • Size compared to other PTZs
  • Relative bandwidth consumption
  • Comparative pricing

Low ***** *********** *******

**** **** *********'* ********* shows, *** ************ *** produces ***** ****** *** better ********** ** *** full *** ** ****** than ***** ******** *********** model, ***** ******* **** IR ***** ** *** near *****, ********* ******* beyond.

*******, **** ******/******** ******* does *** ******** ********* to **** *******, ** the ***-* *********** *** produced ****** ******* ** subjects *** **** (****** without *****) ** *** light ****** *** ******. Additionally, ** ********* ****** with ******* ******** (*+ lux), *********'* ******** *********** PTZ ***** ******** ***** and ****** ******* ** or ****** **** *** DarkfighterX.

**** *** **** ** attractive *** ***** *** absolutely ******* ***** *********** when ******** ******** ** night *** *** ********* moderate *********** ******* ** do ** ** **** require **** ****** ** view. ****** *** ****** to ** ****** ****** by ******** ** **** which ***** ****** ******/**** details ** * ***** cost.

Other ******** - ***** *** ********* ******

*** ************ *** ******** from ***** ****** ***** in **** ***** ** PTZs ** *** **** tests, ******* ** ***** on ******** *** ** to ~** ******* ***** actively ********, ***** *** non-X *********** *** *** significantly **** ** **** problem.

*******, ************ ******** (*.***+) were ****** **** *** standard *********** *** ** low ***** *** **** scenes ** ~**-**%.

Competitor **********

** **** ******, ***** there *** ** **** technical ******** ********, ** focused **** ** *********. In ******** *******, ** will **** ** ***** manufacturer's ** / ***-***** PTZs, **** ****** ***** ***** ********* ** ***.

*******

*** **-*********-**** ************ *** sells *** ~$*,*** *** online, ***** **% ****** than *********'* ****** *********** (non-X) ***, *****-*********-****(~$*,*** ******).

Physical ********

*** ************ *** ** similar ** ************ ** other ********** ** ******, in **** *** ********** (though *** ******* ** silver ******* ** *** typical ***-***** ** ***** Hikvision/other ******).

**** *** *******, *** camera ***** ******* ** conventional ** **** ** its **** ******* *** not ******* ******* *** camera's ****** ****, ** shown ** *** ***** below:

DarkfighterX ******

************ **** *** ***** sensors, *** *** ***** and *** *** ********** and ********* ******** *** two. *********, **** ******* use * ****** ****, with ***** ***** ** each ** ****. ******* of **** ***********, *** DarkfighterX's ******* **** ** color (****** "***" ** the *** *********), **** IR **, ******* *** IP *******.

********* ***** *** ** images ** *** ****** produces **** ******* *******. Moving ********' ********** *** appear ******** "***" *** change ** **** ****, shown *****.

**** **** *** ****** also *** * "*****" monochrome ****, *** **** functions *********** *** **** as ******** ** ****, removing *** ***** *** light *********:

Bright ******/******** ******** **** ****** ***

**** ***** **** ****** of **** (***** *****), the ************ ****** ******** brighter ****** **** ****** contrast ** ***** **** the ******** *********** ****** produces ** ********** **** IR **. *** *** background ** *** *****, clouds, *** ******* ***** are *** ****** ******* in *** ************ *****, but *** ** *** non-X ***********.

**** ** ***** **** side ** ****:

IR "*** ***" **** ****** ***

*******, **** *** ************ camera ** ****** ***, subjects ****** **** ********* to ****** ** *** to **** ***** (***'+), as *** ******'* ** switched ** ****/******* *****, shown *****. **** ******** regardless ** ***** ** being ****** ** ** off.

**** ** ***** ** motion *****, **** *** subject ******* ********** ** range **** ****** **, then **** ********* ** see **** ****** ***.

Reduced **** ******* ******** ** ******** ** *******

******** *** ************ ******** a ******** ******* *****, with ****** *** ****** contrast, **** ******* **** as ****** ******** ******** moderately *******/******* **** ******* in, ******** ***** *********.

*** *******, ** ***' distance (~** ***), *** subject's ****** ******* *** test ***** *** **** clear ** *** ************ camera, *** ***** *** more ************/******* ** *** non-X *********** ***.

** ****** *****/****** **** levels, **** **** ** detail ******* **** **********. Shown ***** ** ~***', the ************ ****** ** dimmer, **** **** ***** subject ******* *** **** chart ********** **** *** standard *********** *****. *******, colors *** ***** ******* visible ** *** ************, shown ** *** ***** below.

*******, ** ****** ***** (~500'), **** *******' ******* suffer, **** **** **** of **** *** ******* and **** ***** ******* details.

Performance ***** ********** ** ******** ***** ******

** ********* ****** **** exterior ********, *** ************ performed ***** **** *** standard *********** *** ** color ****. ***** ****** from ~*-*** ** *** tests, ********* ** ********* to ******* *** ********.

*** *******, ** ~***' distance, **** ***** ** ~5-6lx, *** ************ *** Darkfighter ******* ******* ******* and ***** ******** ** "day" ****, ***** *** standard *********** ******** ******* details ** *** ******* and ***** **** ** on.

*** **** *** **** at ***** ***** ******, ~2-3lx, ***** *****. ** this *****, ******* ** the ************ *** *********** are ******* ** *****, with ******* ***** ****** with ** **.

Occasional ***** ******

****** *******, *** ************ camera *********** ******** ***** issues ******* ** ***** IR **** ******. ** the ******* *****, *** camera ***** ** ***** during *** ****** **** ~15 *******.

** ********, *** ***-* Darkfighter *** ******* ** the ******* ** **** 2-3 ******* ****** * similar ******** *******:

FoV **********

*** **** ***** ********** below ***** *** **** field ** **** ** each ******. ***** *** DarkfighterX ******** ******* ***** coverage **** *** *********** in ***** **** *** fine ******* *** ******* (see ***** ** ********** examples *****)

Full ***** ***********

** ******* ******, *** DarkfighterX *** *********** **** produce ******* ******* ** the ******* *** **** chart, **** ****** *********** in **********. *** ************'* image ** ******* ******/***** than *** ***********, *** practical ******* *** *******.

** **** *****, ~***', details *** *******, ** well.

Bandwidth **********

** **** **** (and *** ****** (~***) scenes, *** ************ *** consumed ~**-**% **** ********* than *** ***-* *********** model. **** ****** ****************'* *.***+ ***** *****.

**** **** ***** ******** were ******** ****** ****** tracking ** **** ******* represent **** ***** ***. Those ***** ****** ***** with **** ********* ** otherwise ****** *** ****** less ********** **** *** H.265+ ******** **** ******* to ***** *******, ****** the ************ ***'* ******** are ***** ********** ****** than ***-*, ** ~**%.

*.***+ ******* **** ********* in ***** *** *********. H.264+ ******* ****** ******* issues ** ******** ******* Center *** ****** ****.

Firmware ****

*** **** ******* ******** available ** *** **** of ******* *** ****, verified ** ********* *** technical *******.

  • ********* **-*********-****: **.*.* ***** 170824
  • ********* **-*********-****: **.*.* ***** 170907

Comments (6)

Avatar

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC
04/26/18 03:54pm

Very well written, very detailed report! I am wondering a few things though;

IR "Cut Off" When Zoomed Out

Is it possible that these types of IR issues could be fixed in firmware? Or is it a by design feature that is just an Achilles heel? It does seem to be a legit issue to me. You would think you would still need that distant area illuminated.

During testing, the DarkfighterX camera experienced moderate focus issues similar to other IR PTZs tested. In the example below, the camera fails to focus during the entire clip ~15 seconds.

By contrast, the non-X Darkfighter PTZ focused on the subject in only 2-3 seconds during a similar tracking example:

I couldn't help but notice that in these examples that the DFX model was zoomed in tighter on the subject walking. Do you find, in general, that PTZ cameras have more trouble focusing on subjects when using more zoom? Is there something inherent in the lens that causes this? Or is this simply a design issue with this DFX model?

Could this also be related to color vs B&W mode? Would the standard DF unit have these issues in color mode? Would the DFX model focus better in B&W mode?

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 04/26/18 04:10pm

I would think they could even out the IR illumination in firmware, yes. It seemed quite odd to me that it was such a sharp drop in illumination. Using the longer range LEDs at low power would likely improve it.

In the testing I've done, it's generally been easier to focus when zoomed further in. And actually that clip from the Darkfighter was taken at that zoom level/range because that was the longest it took to autofocus while tracking subjects in our tests (~3 seconds). In other cases it took even less time.

Good question on color mode. I would expect the non-X camera to autofocus worse in color mode, but simply because the image is darker and lower contrast since it turns IR off. The DFX keeps IR on, so the monochrome image isn't really any brighter/or better contrast.

Avatar

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC
In reply to Ethan Ace | 04/26/18 04:14pm

So I wonder if the lens in the DFX unit is affected by the need to deliver images to two sensors? Wouldn't that be a different lens than DF unit? Maybe concessions had to be made in order to support the dual sensors and that leads to poor focusing capabilities? In that case, it is likely a product design issue and not something that could be improved in firmware?

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

04/26/18 11:27pm

Really comprehensive test. 

Interested in seeing future tests against other brand PTZs. 

Dennis Ruban

05/01/18 03:45pm

what was the quantization level when you measured the bandwidth? When I did my research, 6MP camera generated around 1.2 mbps on medium with H.265+ enabled, and you tested 2MP with pretty much the same bandwidth consumption

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Dennis Ruban | 05/01/18 04:17pm

Our bandwidth measurements were taken with the camera being used for tracking, as we mentioned in the text and included on the chart. So they're higher than average, since there's constant full screen change. When it's still, it's much lower, a few hundred Kb/s. 

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,592 reports, 889 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Verkada 2020 Cameras Image Quality Test on Oct 06, 2020
Verkada's first-generation cameras suffered from numerous video quality...
Quantum Dots Potential for Surveillance Cameras Explained on Sep 08, 2020
Quantum dots are starting to be used in TVs for better images, but how will...
The Future of Metalens For Video Surveillance Cameras - MIT / UMass / Immervision on Sep 25, 2020
Panoramic cameras using 'fisheye' lens have become commonplace in video...
Taiwan Lilin NDAA Compliant Cameras Tested on Aug 13, 2020
Taiwan-based manufacturer Lilin is taking direct aim at Dahua and Hikvision...
Avigilon Elevated Temperature Detection Camera Tested on Sep 17, 2020
Avigilon has entered the temperature screening market with the release of...
Avigilon Announces 10K / 61MP H5 Pro Camera on Oct 05, 2020
Avigilon announced its 10K / 61MP H5 Pro camera at the 2020 IPVM Fall New...
Dedicated Vs Converged IP Video Networks Statistics 2020 on Sep 10, 2020
Running one's video system on a converged network with other devices can save...
Hikvision and Uniview Entry Level Thermal Handheld Cameras Tested on Jun 05, 2020
While most screening systems cost $10,000 or more, manufacturers such as...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
TVT Temperature Measurement Terminal Tested on Jul 23, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision get the most attention for China temp products,...
Hanwha 8K / 33MP Camera Tested on Sep 14, 2020
Hanwha Techwin has released an 8K / 33MP resolution camera, the TNB-9000 with...
Hikvision MinMoe Temperature Screening Terminal Tested on Jun 23, 2020
Hikvision has expanded its temperature screening options. We tested...
Verkada Video Analytics Tested 2020 on Oct 08, 2020
In 2019, Verkada released people and face analytics but our testing then...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
Face Detection Shootout - Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jul 30, 2020
Face detection analytics are available from a number of manufactures...

Recent Reports

ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...
Nokia Fever Screening Claims To "Advance Fight Against COVID-19" on Oct 22, 2020
First IBM, then briefly Clorox, and now Nokia becomes the latest Fortune 500...
Deceptive Meridian Temperature Tablets Endanger Public Safety on Oct 21, 2020
IPVM's testing of and investigation into Meridian Kiosk's temperature...
Honeywell 30 Series and Vivotek NVRs Tested on Oct 21, 2020
The NDAA ban has driven many users to look for low-cost NVRs not made by...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
Dahua Revenue Grows But Profits Down, Cause Unclear on Oct 20, 2020
While Dahua's overall revenue was up more than 12% in Q3 2020, a significant...
Illegal Hikvision Fever Screening Touted In Australia, Government Investigating, Temperature References Deleted on Oct 20, 2020
The Australian government told IPVM that they are investigating a Hikvision...
Panasonic Presents i-PRO Cameras and Video Analytics on Oct 19, 2020
Panasonic i-PRO presented its X-Series cameras and AI video analytics at the...
Augmented Reality (AR) Cameras From Hikvision and Dahua Examined on Oct 19, 2020
Hikvision, Dahua, and other China companies are marketing augmented reality...
18 TB Video Surveillance Drives (WD and Seagate) on Oct 19, 2020
Both Seagate and Western Digital recently announced 18TB hard drives...