720p vs 1080p Camera Shootout

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 25, 2011

When choosing High Definition cameras, one of the most fundamental questions is what of the two common resolution levels one should choose: Do you use 720p or 1080p cameras? The fundamental alternatives are familiar to any user who has bought a TV in the last few years. However, how do you choose when buying network cameras?

The main case for 1080p cameras over 720p ones is that a 1080p camera has over twice the resolution (i.e., pixels) than a 720p one. A 1080p camera has a resolution of 1920 x 1080 (2.07 MP) while a 720p camera resolution is 'only' 1280 x 720 (.92 MP). Because of that, marketing people often conclude that a 1080p is equivalent to (2) 720p cameras.

Our Test

In this test, we choose two very similar cameras from the same manufacturer - one that was 1080p (Sony CH210) and the other that was 720p (Sony CH110). As you can see in the sample image below, from the outside the cameras even look identical:

We wanted to better see how much performance would vary between two seemingly identical cameras with resolution being the main functional difference.

[Note: this is just the latest of our comparison tests of cameras with different resolution. We routinely test SD vs 720p vs 2MP vs 5MP etc. (for other comparisons, see our indoor camera shootout, our parking lot shoot, WDR camera shootout, etc.)]

The Test Process

We took these two cameras and we ran a series of head to head shootouts in a number of conditions:

  • Indoor lighting as one might have in an office or retailer that represent ideal conditions for cameras
  • Low lighting conditions (from 20 lux down to 7, 3 and 1 lux levels) that represent challenging common scenarios for cameras
  • Outdoors for larger area monitoring
The combination of these three scenarios provides a broad range of real world scenarios. The sample image below provides an overview of the scenarios filmed:

Expectations vs Results

Conventional wisdom sets two common expectations of megapixel:

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

  • Higher resolution cameras provide much better image quality (2x, 3x, 4x, etc.) than lower resolution cameras.
  • Higher resolution cameras are much worse at night than lower resolution cameras.

What's particularly interesting about this test is that both of those expectations are violated here, teaching us important lessons about how we should evaluate and specify higher resolution cameras.

Key Findings

Here are the 3 key points learned from the shootout:

  • The 1080p CH210 was far better in low light than the 720p CH110
  • Both cameras delivered essentially the same image detail in an indoor medium FoV scene
  • The 1080p CH210 provided modestly better image details in extremely wide outdoor areas

Relative to conventional wisdom, all 3 findings are surprising.

Key Differences Between the Cameras

While the cameras look the same on the outside, on the inside there are a few important differences:

  • The 1080p CH210 camera uses a 1/2.8 imager while the 720p CH110 uses a much smaller 1/3.8 imager.
  • The 1080p CH210 uses an EXMOR imager while the CH110 uses an older generation generic CMOS imager.
  • Minor: The 1080p has a fixed 88 degree FoV about 10% wider than the 720p with a fixed 80.7 degree FoV.
  • Minor but beware: The 1080p has a default exposure time of 1/30s ('normal') while the 720p CH110 has a default exposure time of 1/8s ('aggressive/slow')

Within Sony's line, all the 720p X series (entry level) cameras (like the CH110) use the generic CMOS sensor. However, all the 1080p X series and all other HD mid level and premium level camears (like the E and V series) do use EXMOR. Finally, while the EXMOR-R, the latest version of EXMOR has gained attention, none of the production Sony network cameras support that.

Our Recommendations

This leads to a number of key recommendations:

  • Be careful in checking camera details even when the cameras look the same and come from the same manufacturer. The guts of these cameras are materially different.
  • Beware of smaller imager sizes. While it is not universal, cameras that use imager sensors at or close to 1/4" tend to deliver far worse performance than cameras with 1/3" or larger.
  • Consider the sensor used. This is the most risky recommendation as many manufacturers champion the use of the Sony EXMOR chip with widely varying performance in our tests. However, it is likely that the EXMOR is the cause of the 210's superior low light performance.
  • If considering between the CH210 and the CH110, you are essentially paying $150 more (~$450 online for the CH210 vs $300 online for the CH110) to get superior low light performance and modestly better wide area coverage. That noted, if you really want strong low light performance, you likely should not consider these cameras as neither support mechanical cut filters (i.e. day/night).

With that noted, let's look at the actual performance.

Even Indoor Light (Easy Case)

We start with an 'easy' scene with 250 lux and approximately 12 foot wide FoV where our subject stands.

Note that the FoV between the two cameras is slightly different because the 1080p CH210 has a roughly 10% wider FoV. However, the CH210 also has 50% more horizontal pixels. The effective advantage in pixels per foot for the 1080p is roughly 40%.

Zooming in to both cameras, we can see the level of details in the face and in the objects on the board are very similar.

The main difference noticeable is the 'trueness' of the colors. The CH210 more realistically captures the skin tone of the subject.

Low Light

When looking at low light, it is useful to descend into decreasing levels of darkness. Let's start with 20 luxs which is visibly dim for humans but still a fair amount of light.

You can see in the comparison below that the 210 delivers a much clearer image of the subject's face than the 110. The 110 is obviously already aggressively using gain control as indicated by the sizeable noise displayed.

Now, let's drop the lighting to 7 lux. Looking at the image below, all of a sudden, the CH110 actually looks brighter and perhaps better than the 110. What's going on here is a 'trick' or, at least, a subtle variance in default camera settings. The CH110 with a default max exposure of 1/8s is taking in nearly 3x the light as the CH210 with a default max exposure of 1/30s.

Now, let's normalize the exposures putting them both on a more standard 1/30s exposure. Now, the CH110's image is clearly far darker and noisier, much worse than the CH210. Alternatively, we could have slowed the CH210's exposure to 1/8s to match the CH110's default. The net result would remain the same - as long as the exposure is equal the CH210's performance is better.

Now's let drop down to 3 lux which is starting to get pretty dark. Below, we start with default exposures again making the 110 look better:

However, after we normalize the exposure to 1/30s on both side, the 210 now is superior delivering some details of the face and objects on the chart while the 110 is much darker and noisier.

Finally, let's take a look at a 1 lux scene with normalized exposures. While the CH110 is almost pitch black and filled with noise, the CH210 shows an outline of the subject and some details of the objects.

NOTE: It is important to remember that while the performance of the CH210 at 1 lux is better than the CH110, almost all Day/Night MP cameras will outperform the color only CH210 in the same conditions.

Outdoors - Very Wide FoV

Finally, we did some tests outdoors to see what would happen in a very wide FoV . The image below is at roughly a 100 - 120 foot FoV. The 210 delivers more details than the 110. However, the increase in details are fairly modest.

Finally, in this last shot at about 200 foot wide FoV, the details are fairly similar but the 110 has some coloration issues (note the yellow tones) that might be a product of the sensor:

1 report cite this report:

Directory of Camera Shootout Series on Dec 27, 2011
The following directory lists all of our camera shootouts. These shootouts pit 4 - 8 different surveillance cameras in simultaneous tests on real...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Low Light

Panoramic Fisheye Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek on Jun 27, 2018
IPVM tested Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek 12MP panoramic fisheye cameras head to head, as shown in the test setup...
Hikvision 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (DS-2CD63C2F-IV) on Jun 14, 2018
Hikvision's DS-2CD63C2F-IV is their flagship panoramic camera, with a 12MP imager, 15m integrated IR, smart codec, and more. We tested the 63C2 in...
Introducing Effective PPF (ePPF) - Improving Video Surveillance Designs on Jun 11, 2018
Pixel density (PPF / PPM) is the best metric the industry has to define and project video quality. It allows simple communication of estimated...
Hanwha Low-Cost 4MP Camera Tested (QNV-7010R) on Jun 11, 2018
4MP usage is increasing noticeably, as IPVM 2018 resolution statistics show. And low-cost, fixed focal cameras, are popular for budget...
Hikvision PanoVu 20MP Flexible Camera Tested on Jun 01, 2018
Hikvision has released their first repositionable multi imager cameras with integrated IR included, atypical in competitors. We bought and tested...
Stats: Upgrading Cameras Far More Common Than Replacing Failed Cameras on May 30, 2018
The old saying "If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It" does not apply here. New IPVM statistics show that 60% of cameras that are replaced still work but...
Oncam 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested on May 29, 2018
Oncam has made their name since the early 2000s as a fisheye specialist, focusing only on panoramic cameras. To see how this specialist stacks up...
Dahua 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (NK8BR4) on May 16, 2018
Continuing our coverage of 12MP sensor fisheye cameras, we bought and tested the Dahua NK8BR4, examining: Default vs. Optimized...
Vivotek 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (FE9391-EV) on May 08, 2018
Next in our 12MP fisheye camera evaluation, we bought and tested Vivotek's latest generation FE9391-EV, a new model claiming improved smart IR...
Last Chance - May 2018 Camera Course on May 03, 2018
This is the last chance to register as the course starts next week. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Free 100+ Manufacturer-Customized Camera Calculator Released on Jul 19, 2018
Now, any manufacturer has a customized IPVM Camera Calculator, free. The goal is to make it easier for companies to help their customers better...
Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
Last Chance - Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 19, 2018
Today is the last day to register. Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security...
Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact