Geovision GV-EDR2100 Tested Vs Hikvision

By John Scanlan, Published Oct 16, 2017, 08:45am EDT (Research)

* ****** ** ***'* *** ******* IP ******* ***, ** ***** ************ to **, **** *********.

** ******** ****** *** ********* ********* ******* ***** ** ********, ***** ** ****** ***** ********* *** Dahua ***** ** ******.

******, ** ***** *** ******* **** ******** out *** ********* ***** ********* **-**********-*, *********:

  • **** ***** *** *** ***** ***** quality
  • *** ***********
  • ** *****
  • ** ************ *******
  • **** **********
  • ********* ***********

*******

** *** *****, *** ********* ******* was ******** ** ****** ***** ******** to *** ********* ****:

  • ***** ** *****: *** *******'* ****** ** ***** *** only ~**% ** *** ********* *** distance, ******** ***** ***/~**', ***** *** 2125 ******* *** *** ***** ****.
  • ****** ****** ** *******: ** ******** ** *** ***** *****, the *******'* ******* *** ******, **** a ****** ****** ******* *** ****** totally **** *****.
  • **** ********* ***********: ********* *********** *** **** **** *** standard (*** ***** *****) *.*** *******, with ******** **** ** ****** **** 10 **/* *** *** *****, ******** to scenes ***** *** *.***+ ***** ***** 2125.
  • **** **** ***** ******: **** ***** *********** *** ****, **** less ******* *** **** ************ **** the ********* ****.
  • ***** *** *********: *******, *********'* *** ********* ** ***** compared ** **** *************, ********* ******* which *** ****** ******* ** **** machines ******, ******** ********** **** ** IE ******** ******, *** *** ****** organized.

******* ** ***** ******, *** *******'* main advantage ** *****, ********** ***** **** Hikvision ****** ********, *** ** **** for ***** $*** ** *** **** of *******.

*******

*** ********* ******* *** ** *********** *** ~$*** ***, ********** ***** **** *********'* **** in **** **** (~$*** ******). *******, note **** ** ********* *** ****** for ~$** ** ****. 

Physical ********

*** ******* ** ********** ******* ** other ***** **** ******* ** *****, moderately ******* **** *** ****, *** with ******* **********.

Web ********* ******

**** **** ********* *******, *** *** interface ** *** ******* ** *****, using ** ******* ******* ***** ********** fails ** *** ** ******** ******* security ****** ** ******** ********. 

************, **** *** **** ***** **** as ********, ****, ***., *** ******* in * "******" **** ***** ** clicking * ***** ***** ** *** live **** *********, *** ******* ** many *****.

***** *******

** ****** ***** ******* ******** *** and ***** ** *** ***** ** view *****.

Extremely **** ** ***** *** ****** ** *******

*** ******* ******* ************** *** *** IR *************, ******** **** ~***/**', ***** 50% ******* **** *********. 

************, **** ************ *** ******** ******* in *** ****** ** *** ***, creating * ****** *******, ***** *** subject *** ****** ************ ** *** edge ** *** ***** ** ****, shown *****:

Poor *** ***** ***********

** ~**' *****, *** *******'* **** ***** any ******* ** *** *******, ***** ** *** 2125 *** ******** ****** ******* *** better *******, *** *** ***** ******** an ***** **** ** *** ** ******* characters.

**** *** ******* *** ***** *** moved **** ** ~**' *** ******* is ********* ** ****** ** *** FoV **** *** *********'* **** **, while *** **** ******** ***** ** illumination, ****** **** ***** ******* ** the *******.

******, ** ~**' ********, *** ******* is *********** *****, ***** *** ********* 2125 *********** *** ******* *** *****, making **** ****** **********. 

**** ******* ******

** ~**' *** ********* ** ************ by *** ********* ***** ******** **** detail ** *** ******* *** *****. While *** ********* ** ******** *********** on *** **** **** ** *** chart, *** ********* ** **** ***********.

**** *** ******* *** ***** *** moved ** * ~** ******** **** the ***** *** ********* ********* ** provide **** ****** **** *** ********* 2125.

Edge *** / **** **********

**** *** ******* ** * ~**' distance ** ****** *** **** ********** at *** ****** **. *** **** of *** ***** ** ****.

 

***** ***** ** ********** ********** / skewing ** *** ***** *** ******* provided *** **** *******.

Very **** ********* **********

*** *******'* ******** **** ********* ****, even *** *** ***** ***** *.*** cameras, **** ******** **** ** **/* both *** *** *****. ** ********, using *.*** **** ***** ***** ** the ********* ****, ******** **** **** low ** ******* ******, **** ***** 100 **/*. 

Digital *** ***********

*** ******* ******** ******* *** (***** ********* ****** ***** "***"), ***** **** *** **** ****** now ******* **** *****-******** ***, ********* the ********* ****. ** *** *** these *******, ** **** *** ******* in * ********* *** ***** **** open ******** ****.

*** ******* ******** ***** ******* ** the ******* **** ******* ****** ******** outside *** ** *** ****** **** beside *** ****, **** *********** ******* difficult ** *******. ** ********, *** Hikvision ***** ******** ******* ** *** subject *** ***** ** **** *****.

Test **********

*** ********* ******* **** **** ** this ****:

  • ********* **-*******: **.** ****-**-**
  • ********* **-**********-*: **.*.****** ****** 

Comments (11)

What a dog!

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Guys in fairness the Geovision EDR2100 is not a great camera and would be be one of there top products. You should do a test between the Bullet range e.g EBL2100 and above

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John, we test like form factors against each others as much as possible. If there is a better Geovision dome at somewhat similar price, we would consider. Let us know what you recommend for domes.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

I would recommend testing the gv-efd2100

 

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

EFD2100 is the same platform as EDR2100.
There is no significant difference in the image quality of both.
If going to do additional tests, I recommend the EVD2100 (2MP Starvis, but only support H.264 codec) or EDR4700 (4MP, support with H.265 Smart stream).

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Geovision...yawn. Only thing they have going is despite the crappy image, the cameras always seem to function. They’re too proud of their prices for something that doesn’t have great image. They better stop relying on their name and step up to the plate on performance otherwise they’re the next pelco.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

You had me at ActiveX controls.  Thanks

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

I'm using Geo H.265 smart codec cam (BL3700) but it consumes much bandwidth and the detail of the subject are collapsing, compared with Dahua HFW8331E.
In short a NR function and compression algorithm looks poor.
Also it does not have the IVA function other than motion and tamper detection and video analytics function of GV-VMS is not good precision.
I've been using Geo for many years but I can't stand to see present situation.
If they are satisfied with the present situation, sooner or later become pelco, I think.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

LENS parameters? 2.8mm or 6mm?   distance up to15m

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

The lens was 2.8mm on the EDR-2100 tested.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

UD#3 I would agree. I don't think they have the ability to develop software that works without patches. Total disappointment on cheap entry level cameras as well. To compete with hikvision they give you plastic housings and its just poor quality construction. When adjusting those entry level cameras they feel like they are going to break. I lost interest when I tried to RMA several thousand dollars worth of bullet cameras that had clearly leaked through the wiring entry. You could see the water trail down inside of the camera housing. They told me I installed the lens cover improperly and didn't warranty them. That really tweaked me I wasn't aiming them at planes.  I never had that problem again. "Never bought another one" and never will.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny
Subscribe to IPVM Research to read the full report.
Why do I need to subscribe?
The IPVM Research Service includes products tests and shootouts plus competitive and financial analysis, helping decision-makers better evaluate purchasing, partnering, developing, and/or competing against companies in physical security.
Already have an account?
Loading Related Reports