$100 True WDR Camera Tested (FLIR CVI)

By Derek Ward, Published Jul 31, 2015, 12:00am EDT

True WDR has traditionally been quite expensive.

And HD analog has so far been mostly low-end models.

Now, FLIR has released a ~$100 1080p CVI camera with true WDR and integrated smart IR.

We bought the FLIR C233BD to see how it performs against other CVI models and the Axis Q1615, a leading WDR IP model.

*** ******** **** *** test *******:

***** *** ***********

** *** ******, *** 1080p **** ******'* *********** is **** **** ** the **** ***** *** better **** *****'* ***** 2.0 ******, *** **** of *** ** ****** camera ** **** ******. 

******** *** ***** ***********

**** ******* *** ***** settings ******** (**** ** Off *** *** *** to ***), ***** ******* was ******** ** ***** cameras ******, **** *** chart *** **** ******* well ***********. ****, ***** IR ****** ******* ** avoid **** *** *************.

*** ******* *** ***** Settings

*******, *** ****** ******** to * ** **** Up (**** *******), ** well ** *** *** low (* *** ** 20). When **** ** ********, the ***** ******* **** with * ****** ****** IR *******.

********** **** ***** ***********

** **** *** ******, ***** quality *** ******* ** other HDCVI *** ** ******* tested, **** ** ******* issues.

************ ***** & ******/**** Streaming

*** ****** ******* **** 1080p ***** (***) *** 960H ** ****** **************. This ** ****** *** aiming/focusing **** ******** ******** displays ** ****** ** public **** ********.

*******

******* *** *********** ***~$** *** ******, ****** ** *** of *** ****** **** true *** ***** ****** available.

** ** ********** **** expensive **** **** ***-*** 1080p ** ****** ******, such ** *** ***** HAC-HFW2220SN ($** ******) ** ***-**********-** (~$** ******).

***************

*** **** ****** ** one ** *** ***** true *** ***** ****** readily ********* ** ***** America, ****** ** ****** in ************ ***** ***** have **** *** *******. 

Physical ********

** **** *****, ** review *** ******** ************ of *** **** *** C233BD. ***** ****** **** the ****** ***** ** the **** ** *** camera, ***** ******** *** OSD **** *** ****** settings.

*** **** ****** ** moderately ****** **** ***** ******* bullet *******, **** ** the ***** ***** **** here **** *** *****:

*** **** *** ****:

Image Quality ***********

** ****** *** **** C233BD ** *** ********** room ** **** ***** and ********. ***** ** the *** **** *** testing.

** **** ***** (~*** lux), *** **** ****** performs ********* ** **** the ***** ********* ***** and ***-******* ** *******, with ****** ********* ****** *** subject's ****, *** **** to **** **** ** line ~*-* ** *** test ***** ******* *** cameras.

**** *** ****** ****** off, *** ***** ** ~0.01. *** **** ****** defaults ** **** ** 2x *** *** **** (4 *** ** **). Below ** * ********** with *** ******* ******** vs **** ** ****** off *** *** *** to ***. **** **** up *** *** **** max, *** ***** ******* more **** ***, **** more ** *** *** visible ******* ******* *** our *******.

** *** *****, *** cameras **** **** ******* in *** *******'* **** and **** *****. **** each ****** ***** **** one ** * ****, the ******* ***** ******* washed *** *** ***** camera. *******, *** **** in *** **** ****** is ***** *** ******* down ** **** ~*-*.

*******, ** **** *** HDCVI *** ** ******* in *** ********* ***** at ** **** ****** door. ***** ** *** FOV **** *** *******.

*** **** *****, ** added *** **** ***** as * ******** **** WDR ******. **** *** on *** *** ** max *** **** ** these *******, *** **** and **** ******* *** see *** ******* *** test ***** ** **** the ***** *** **** areas ** *** *****. However, **** ** *** Dahua's **** *** *** chart *** ***** ** the ***** *******.

***********

*** ******* **** ****** using ******* ******** **** the ********* ********** (****** otherwise *****):

  • ******* ***** *** ************ to */*** *******.
  • *** *** ****** ** at ******* ******.

*** ***** **-*********-* ***** encoder *** **** **** firmware ******* *.***, ***** ****-**-** (**.*.*).

*** *** ** ******* used, ******** ******** *** as *******:

  • **** *****: *.**.*
  • ***** ***-********: *.***.******* **.*.*

Comments (8)

Undisclosed Integrator #1

07/31/15 12:18pm

Is True WDR the same as "WDR Pro" ?? (which I assume is hardware/sensor based, unlike "normal/digital" WDR which is software-based; and the reason why it is more expensive)...

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 07/31/15 12:39pm

'Pro' is a marketing term.

When we say 'true' WDR, we mean mutli-exposure rather than digital nor electronic. See: WDR Tutorial

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

DC Long

07/31/15 09:05pm

IP version on the Horizon? Or is there a little black box that would encode 2-4 of these Heads? Good to see FLIR in the Market. Where's it made? Some nervious about China - US Relations.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Chris Dearing

IPVMU Certified | In reply to DC Long | 07/31/15 09:17pm

Or is there a little black box that would encode 2-4 of these Heads?

1-4 head encoders available, same big black box regardless (in green)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #2

In reply to DC Long | 07/31/15 11:09pm

Where's it made? Some nervious about China - US Relations.

I think it's safe to assume anything with a sub-$200 street price is not made in (or anywhere near) the US.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

DC Long

08/01/15 01:27am

Taiwan is a free trade partner. No one challenged White house punitive taffifs on PV Panels from TW. (which is illegal as hell) . Just Syaing. FLIR is an interesting company.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Luke Maslen

IPVMU Certified | 08/01/15 05:41am

Hi Derek, thank you for a very helpful report. I've been keenly awaiting true WDR HD-CVI cameras. The FLIR C233BD looks as though it performs very well. My only disappointment is the appearance of its angular sunshade. The curved one on the Dahua camera looks much nicer although it could be longer.

Do you think there is any technical reason why FLIR would choose to put an angular sunshade on a cylindrical camera? Do you think the camera would really benefit from having the unattractive gills (vents) in the sunshade? I'd rather they weren't there. I hope they release a dome version of this camera too.

Thank you for your insight.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #3

IPVMU Certified | 08/01/15 07:59am

Do you think there is any technical reason why FLIR would choose to put an angular sunshade on a cylindrical camera?

Because Dahua doesn't? ;)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 7,008 reports, 931 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports