Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators

By IPVM Team, Published Jul 07, 2020, 10:25am EDT (Info+)

While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of security systems integrators shows weak sales, opposition to regulation, and no clear favorite provider.

IPVM Image

Inside this report, based on 200+ integrator responses, we explain:

  • Whether and why they are selling facial recognition or not
  • What manufacturer they believe offers the best facial recognition
  • Whether and why facial recognition should be regulated

Executive *******

**** *****:

  • **** *****: **** *** *********** *** ******* facial *********** **** ******** ****** *** customer ******, ******** ***** **** ******, user *******, *** **** ******** *********** like **** ******* ***** ****.
  • *********** ******: ******* **** **** **** ********* interest ** **** ********* *** **** temperature *******, ******* **** *********** ******** are ***** ********* ** *** ********* used *** '********' ******** *** '******' monitoring *******.
  • ****-**********: * ******** ******** *** ******* facial *********** ***** ********* **** *** key ****** ***** ******** ** ********** to ****** ******** ******* ******** * risk ******.
  • ** ***** '****': ***** *** *** ******* ****** recognition, **************, ***** *** ** ***** best. ***** *** ******** **** *** a ********, ********* *** ******** **** mentioned *** ****.

Few ***** ****** ***********

** ***** ** *** **** ****** reason *** ****** ** ** **** recognition *** ** ****** **** ***-**** demand. ******* ********* ** *** ******* a **** ** ****** ** ******* it, *********** *** ********* ** *** have ***** ********.

*****, ****** ***** ******* ******** ***** privacy *** *** ********* ********* ** resellers ** * ******* ****** *** sell **** *** *******. ** ******, several ********* ******* ******** * ***********, *** ** ********** restrictions.

No **** *********** ******

*** **** ****** ***** *** ****** demand:

  • "*** *********. ** ****’* ****** **** requested."
  • "**. **** **** ********* **** **** solutions ** *** ****** *** *****'* had * **** **** **** *** client **** ** ** * ****."
  • "**. * **** *** *** * single ****** *** *** **."
  • "***** *** **** ******* ********. *** of *** ******** ********* *** ******* into ** *** ******* **** **** a ********** ** **** *****."
  • "**, * *****'* *** **** ** if *** ********* ********* ****** ***********"
  • "**. ** ******** *** ** *** it ******* "********" ** **. ** don't **** ***** ****** ***** **** comes ***. **** ** * ************ company, *** * *********** *******. ** and **** ***** ** * ********** use **** *** **** *********** ** would **** ** *** ** ** our *********."
  • "**. ***** *** *** **** * demand *** ** **** ** ******** base."
  • "****. **** *** ********* *** ****** for ** *** *** **** **** does *** ***** ****** *******/****** *** implementation."
  • "**. *** ********* **** *** ***** for **."
  • "** *** ***. ** **** *** seen ****** *** ** ** ***."
  • "**, ** **** ** *** ******* we **** ****."
  • "** ******* **** ** ******** ** this."
  • "**, *****'* *** *** ******* *** want ** ***."
  • "*** ***. **** *** *** **** inquiry **** *********."
  • "***, *** **** ********."
  • "**. ****'* ***** ***** *** **."
  • "**. *** ********* **** *** ***** for **."
  • "** ******** **** *********."
  • "**, **** ** *** ********* ** not ******* **** **** ** *******."
  • "*** *** ****. *** *** **** of * ****** **** *********."
  • "**. ** ****** *** ** **** our *********"
  • "**. *** **** ** ********* **** right ***."
  • "** ********* *** ** *** **."
  • "** *******, **** ****, *** ******* serious."
  • "**, ** **** * ***** ****** for **** **** ** *******."
  • "** **** **** *** ****** *********** yet ** ***. ** *** **** hasn’t **** * **** *** ********* yet."

Privacy ******

****** ******* ** *** ********* ***** for ****-********** *********** ** ******** ****** for *** **** ***** ********* ** the *******. ******, ***** *********** **** the ******** ******** *** ******** ** this *****:

  • "**, ****** *********** ** * *** button *****. ****** ** ******* **** tied ** ** ** ****** ** nothing *** * ****** ** **** point. ** **** ** ******** ** until *** ********** **** ** ******** or ** ********* ******* (******* **. public)."
  • "**** - *** *** *** ** worms **** ** ***'* **** ** mess ****. *** ********* ********* *** outweighs *** **** ********. ...*** **** rec ***'* ****** **** ****** *** our ******* ************."
  • "**. *** **********. * *** *********."
  • "**. *** *********** **** ********** *** reliability. ********* ********* ********. ******** ***** with *********** ********* *** ** *** control."
  • "**** ** ******* *** *** **** interest **** *******. ******** ** ******* to *** **** *** ********** ** going ** ** ***** ***********."
  • "**. *****'* *** * **** *** market *** ** *** *** * also **** ******** ***** ********* *** reliability."
  • "**. *** ********* **** **** ** is ** ********* ** *** ******* of ***** *********."
  • "**. ** *** ** *** ************ midwest *** **** ******* ***** *** too ********."
  • "** *** ****** ** **** ** the ************ ****** *** ** *****'* had *** ******* ***** *****. **** is * ***** ****** **** ******* facial *********** *** ********* *** **** concerned ***** ******* ** *******."

GDPR ********

********** ****** ** *** ** ***** the *********** ******* ******* **** *********** is ********** ** * ******** *****, and **** ** ******** ********* * system ** * ********* *** ** so ****** ** *********** ******* ** from *************:

  • "**, **** *** **********'* **** *** very ****** ***** ****** ***********. ****** impossible ** **** ********** ** *******."
  • "** ** **** ***** *****."
  • "**** **** **** **** ** **** no *** ***** ** ** **."
  • "**. ** ****** *** ** *** due ** **** **********."
  • "**, ********** ** *** ** *******"
  • "** ******, ** ** *** *******, or **** **********. *** ******** ** record ********."

Too *********

******* ** *** '** ******** ******' observations *** **** **** *********** *********** and ******* **** *** **** ** justify ***** *****:

  • "*** ******** ***** **** ** * higher ***** ***** **** **** ** my ********* *** *** ******* ** spend."
  • "**. ** **** ******* ****** *** for ** *** **** **** *** how **** ** ***** **** **** to *** ** **** ********** *******."
  • "**, ****** *** ********* *** *********."
  • "** **** **** *** * ***** number ** ********* *** ** *** are *** ********** ** ******* ***** crap **** *****'* ****, ****** *** not ********** ** ****** *** * "proper ********" ** ** **** ****** them **** * **********."
  • "**, *** *'* **********. **'* ********* but **'* ** **** **** ****** than **** *** ****** *******."
  • "******** **** **** * **** ***** tag."
  • "***, ** *** * *** ** quotation, *** *** *** *********."
  • "*** ********* ******* ****** *********** *******. Customers ****'* **** ********** ** ******* it **** **** *** *** * vendor ** ** * **** *** show **** *** *****. ** *** boils **** ** ****."
  • "*** ******, *** *** ********* **** have **** ********** ** *** **** recognition ** *********** *** **** **** been * *** ***** ** *** cost :)"
  • "**, ******* ***** *** *** *** high *** **** ** *** ******* models *** *** * *** **** cost."
  • "******** ** ****, *** ********* **** tiny ******* *** **."
  • "*** *** ***** ***** **** ** benefit"
  • "** **** **** ********* * ***, but *** ***** ** ***** * sticking *****."
  • "*** * ****** *** ** ** Melbourne ******* **** ****** *** *** cheap"
  • "***** *** **** ** **** **** recognition ** ****** *******. *******, ******* don’t **** ** ***** $$."

*** ******* ******* ** *********** ***** some ******* *** **** ********* (*.*., Anyvision, *****, ***) ***** ******, ****** from *****, *** *********** ****** ****** recognition ****. *******, *** *** *****, the ***** *** *******, ** ***** temporarily ** ***** *******.

Coronavirus ******* ********

*******, ********* ****** ***-**** ******** *** face *********** ***** ********* *********** ** a ******. ******* ******* **** *********** terminals **** ******* **** ********* ***/** body *********** ********, **** *********** ******* are ****:

  • "***. *** ****** ******* **** ******** touching ********* *** *** ** **** right *** *** ** *******."
  • "***, **** ********* **** **** ********* facial *********** **** *** ******** ******* cameras ** **** ******."
  • "***. ** *** ****** ** ***** of **** *********** ** ** ******* user ******** *********** **** *** ****** thereby **** ****** *** *** ****** and *** ** ***** ******* ** spreading *** ********** ***** **** **** recognition ******** ** ***********."
  • "** **** ******* ******* *** ****** readers *** ****. *** **** ****** but ** *** ******* *** ******** and ******** ******** *** ****** ******* or ***** *** ***********."
  • "**** **, ** **** * *********** and **** **** ********** ******** **** uses **** ********* ** **** ** assessing *** *********** *** ****."
  • "***, ****** **** *** ** **** of *********** *******."
  • "** **** *** **** * ******** for **** *** *** *** **** into *** **** ****."
  • "********* ***'* **** *** ****. *** current ******* ** ********* * ****/**** tablet *** ** ****'* ** ********."
  • "***, *** *** ****** *** *** identification ** ********* **************. **** *****, just ** *** * **** *** whether ** *** ******* ** ******* a ****."
  • "*** ******* **** *** ******* ** buy ******* **** **** *** ****** aware **** *** ***** ********* ********** a ****** ******** *******. **** ****** that ** ** * ****** ******* only *** *** * ****** ******** problem."
  • "***, *** ******* ******* *** *** using **** **** (**** **** *********)"

No ********** ** ****** ***********

*** ******** ** *********** **** '**' to **********, **** **** ******** ******* regulation, ****** ********** ****-***** *** ******* government *************** ** ***** ********** ***** as *** ******* ******:

  • "** ***** ** **** ** ***** were *********** ********* *** ***********, ********, and ******** ** * *********, *** I ***'* ***** ** ***** **********."
  • "**. *** ********** ********* *** **** already."
  • "**!!!"
  • "**, ** * ******** ***** ** implement **, ****'* ** ****. ** an ******** ** ******** *****'* **** it. **** *** ** ******** *********."
  • "**. *** ********** *****'* ** **** well. *** ********** ***** ** ****** handled ** ****** ******* ****."
  • "**, ***** *** *** **** ********* things **** *** ********** ***** ** focus ** ******* ****** ***********."
  • "*****! **** ****** *** ***** *** the ********** ***'* ** ******* ** regulate ******** ******* ******** ** **. use **** ** ********* *** ****** with *** ********** ******* ** *** most."
  • "* ** *** *** ********* **** regulation ** **** ****** ******* ***’* going ** ******** *** **********?"
  • "* ***'* ********** *** ** ****** be ********* *** ********** ** ******* property."
  • "**. *** ********** ****** ***** ** over-regulate, ***** ****** *** **** ** the ******* ** *** ***** **** the ******** ** *** ********."
  • "**, * **** ******* ** ****, too **** ***** ****** *** *****"
  • "**. **** ***'* ******** ****."
  • "** ***** ** *** **** **** involve *** **********. **** **** *** technical ********* ** **** *** ********* regulation."
  • "**, **'* ***** *** *** ***********. If ** *** ** ** ********* the ********** ******* ***** ** *******."
  • "*'* * ***********, *'* ***** ** be ** ******* ****."
  • "* ***'* ***** ******** ****** ** regulated ** *** **********. ** **** too **** ********** *******."
  • "**"
  • "**. **'* **** ** ******** ******** what *** ***'* **********."
  • "**, * **** ********** **********, ** usually ***** ******** ****."
  • "**. **** **** **** ***** *** technology ** ** **** *********. ** will **** **** *** ******* *** cause ********** ** ********. *** ********* should **** ************ ** ***** *** should ** ******* **** *** ***** Personally ************ ***********. ********** **** *** to ** ****."
  • "**, **'* *** ** ******** ** privacy **'* * **** ********* ************* tool"
  • "**. *** ********** ******* *** *** much ********** ** ******."
  • "**, * ** ****** **** *** regulation **** **** **** ** *** whole *****."
  • "**. * *** *** ****** *** security ** ******* **** ********. ** course, ** ** ** **** *** profiling *** ******** ****** ***********, **** it ***** **** **********."
  • "* ***'* ***** ** ****** ** regulated. ***** *** **** *** **** to **. * ***** ** *******'* be ********* *** ** *** ***** we **** **. ********** ********* ********* after ***** ****, **** ********, ***."
  • "**. ** ***'** *** ***** ******** wrong *****'* ******* ** ** ********* about. ** ***'* **** **** ***********."
  • "**."
  • "*** * *** ** *** ********** regulating ******** ** ******* **** *** track ****** **** ****."
  • "**, ** *** ********* **** ****** regulated ****** ***********. ************, *********, *** accuracy ***** ** *******/****** ** ***** of *** *****."
  • "*** ** *** ******* ***** ** from ************* ******* ** * ****** area ** ****** ***** ***** ******* invasion **** **** ** **** ** London ** *** ********** ** ******* everywhere."
  • "**. ******, *** ******* *** ******! We *** *** * ********* ********** like ***** ***** ***** ** **** be ******** ** ** **** *********."
  • "** **** (*** **********) ***** ** everything **** *****"

Yes, **** **** *********** ***********/****

*******, **** ***** '***', **** *********** and ** ***** **** **** ********** use *** ******, ********** *** ******* used ** ****** ****** ** ********** entities:

  • "***, * ***** ***** ****** ** limitations ** *** ** ** **** and *** **** *** *** ***** data."
  • "* **** ****** *** ****. ******* anything *** **** **** ***** ** exploited *** **** *** ******."
  • "* ******* ** * ******* *****, yes. *** ***** ** **** *** confront ******* ***** ** ********* *** the ****** *** *****. *** **** can ** *******, *** *** **** be **** **********. **** *****, ** can **** ***** **** ****’* *********."
  • "***, *** *********** ****** *** ** using ** ** **** **** ******* its ***** *** * ******** **********. The ********** ****** *** ************ ** use ***** ********** ** *** **** accurate."
  • "* ** ********* * ******* ********** free-market ******. ***, ***** *** ****** those *** ******** *** ********** *** ill-willed ******. * ***** ***** ***** to ** **** **** ** ******** for **** ** ******* ** ** done **** *** *********** ** ******* of *** ******* ** ************* *** there **** ****** ** ******* *** takes *** ********** *** ****** ** in * *** **** *** *** intended. ***** ******** ****** *** ******* the ************ ** **** ********* *** the ******** ** ******* *** *** minority. *** *********** ** *** *** be *** *********."
  • "** * ****** **** **********/********** **** around ***, *** ******** ** *** storage ** *** ****** ****** ****** databases."
  • "***, ***** ****** ** * ***** to *** ** ** **** *** the ******** ******* ***** * ******* amount ** ****."
  • "***. *** **** ******* (*********** *** vendors) *** **** ** ****** ****."
  • "******* **** ********** ** ******** ** how **'* **** ******* *** ***** has ****** **** ****** **** ** the ** ********** *** **, ********, etc. *** ***** ******** * *** when ********** ********** ***** *** ********** is "** *** ****/*** ** ********"?"
  • "**********, *** ** ******. ***** *** of ************ *** *** *** **** importantly **** **** **** *** ** used ***. ** **** ** ******* from *** *** *** *********."
  • "***, ******* ** **-**** *** *** not ****** *** ****."
  • "***, ** ***** *** ** ********** consequences ** *********** ******** ************** ***********."
  • "***. *** ********** ** *** ******** and **'* ********. *** ********** *** should ******* ********** ************ *** ***-***. Commercial ********; *.*. **/*****, ***. ****** not ** **** ** *****/*** ******* first ******** **** ***-*** ******* ********** the **** (*.*.*********** ****** ** **, Amazon, ***. ****** **** ******* ** the ****** ********** ** ****)"
  • "***, ** ** * ******** ********** that **** ****** *** *** ***** aware ** *** ************ ** ***** it."
  • "***, ***** ****** ** ********* ******* and *********** ********** ******* *** ******* of **** ***********. ********* ****** *** be ******* ** **** ** ******* that **** ** ****** ****. ******* to *** ***** ***** *** *** nearly ** *********."

Uncertain/Mixed *******

*** ********* ******* ***** **** *****, citing ******* ******** **** ****** ********** or ******* ********* ** **** ****** in *** ********** ** ***** ****. Indeed, ***** '*** ********** ****' *** mentioned, ** *** *** '******* ****** abuse' ** *** **** ****:

  • "*** ** *** ** ***** **** and ** ** *** ** ****** the ********** *** **** ***** ** power."
  • "* ** ** ** *** *** on **** ***. **** ** ** says ** ** *** ********** *** enough ********** ** ******** *** *** personal *****. ** *** ***** ****, it ******** ****** ** *********. ** the ***** *****, **** *** ** very *********. ********* ** *** ** people **** ** *** *** ********** they **** ******** ** ***."
  • "****'* * ***** ********. * ***** it ******* ** *** ** ***** it, ***'* *** ****** ** ****** regulated **** **** ***, ***********, *** all ***** ******** ************** *******. ***** may ** ********** **** ********* ** convicted *** ********* **** ***** ******** a ***** ****; *** **** *** regulates *** ***** ****, ***** ** should ** ****** ********* *** **** to *** ****. ** *** ******* side, * ***** ****** ** *** use ** ***** ********* *** ****** control **** ** ******** ****** **** less ********** **** ***** ***** **** for ******** *** ******* ********. **** should ** ********* **** *** ***'*."
  • "*** ****. * ***** *** **** does **** ** ********* ******* ******** vs ****** ******. ** ** **** my ******* ** ** ***** ******* on ******* ******** *** ***** ** the ******** *****. *** ****. ****’* a **** ******."
  • "****** **** ** **** ***. *** potential ******** *** ****** *** ******** are ********, *** *** ********* (*/* people ****) ****** ** ** ** of ***** *******. ***** ** **** better, ********** **** ****** ** *****, we **** *********!"
  • "********* *** **** ********** * ******* might ** *********** ** ************ ******* use ** * ************** ******. *** that ***** **** * **** ****: for *******, ** ** ************ ***** to ****** *** ******* ** * political ******** ***** ***** ********* ******* they ****** ********, **** ***** ** too ***** ** ************** ******* ********* party ***********."
  • "*** *** **. **** ** * slippery *****. ***** ****** ** **** regulation *** **** *** ******* **** of *** ******* ******** *** **** in *** ***."
  • "********* ** ** *********** **** ****** to ******* *** *** ** "*******" but ***** ** ***** ** ********** when ** ***** ** *********** ****** offenders. ** **** **** * ** not **** **** ********* **** ****** provide *********."
  • "* ***** ********* ****** ** ***** that * ***** ******** ** ***** facial ***********, *** **** ** *** extent ** *** *********** **** ****** be *******. **'* ******* ******** ** the ***- ******** **** ********- ***** is **** **** *********. ** *******'* do ******** ** **** ** ****** innovation ***** **** **** **** *** competitive **** **** ********* **** ************* firms."
  • "*** *** **. *** ******* ****** a ****** ******** **** **** *** end ********* * ******* ****** *** evaluating *** *********. *** ******* **** will ****** **** ********** ******* ** well ********* **, **** **** ***** vendor ************."
  • "**** *** ** *********. * ******* that ** ** *** ***** ** start ******* ***** ****** *********** ****** regulation ** **** *** **** **** areas."

No ***** **** ****** ******** *** ********* **** *******

*** ******** ** ******* *** *** cite * ********* **** *********** *****, and **** ***** ** ** **** little ********** **** *** ******* ** all. ** *** ******** **** *** a ********, ******** *** ********* **** cited **** *****, **** ** ***** brand ***** ********* **** **** * handful ** *****.

********

***** ******** *** **** **** ******** facial *********** *** * ***** ****, they ********* **** ********'* ******* ******** in *** ******:

  • "** *** ******* ******** ***** ** are ** *****+ *******. ** ** are ******* **** *** *********** **** will ** **** ** **** ****."
  • "****** **** ******* ******** ******** *** I **** **** ********* *** **** it *****."
  • "[** *** *******] ** **** ******** ACC7 **** **** ********** ******* ** best. *** *** **** **** ******** in ********* *** * ***** ****** that *** **** ******** ** ***** or ********* ****** *** ****** ***** system **** *******. **'* **** ***** easy ** *** *** **** **** accurate ** **************."
  • "******** ***** ** **** *** **** technology *** ** *** ******* ** use. ******** ** *********."
  • "* ***** ******** ******** *** *** best ******* ** ** ***** ********** into *** ********, *** ***** *** several **** *** ***** ** **** them * *** *** ***** *****."
  • "********. **** ** ******** ********."
  • "* ***** ******** *** *** **** analytics ** *** ****** ***** ***."
  • "********---** *** *****'* **** * ****** analytic ********."
  • "** *** ******* ******** *********, ** has **** * ****** ******* ** far *** **** **** ** **** we **** **** **** **** ********** results - *** **** *** ** isn't **********."
  • "**** ******* ** *** ** *** major *****, ******** ** ********* ********* recognition *** ** ***** **** *** Enterprise ********, *** * ***** ***** addon."

*******, ***:******** ****** *********** '********** ******' ******.

** ********, ***** ******** *********** **** Axis *** ****** ** *** (** least ***) ***** ***** *** ****** recognition. ***** *** ********* ********* ** offer ****** *********** ****** **** *** been ************* *** *** ** ***** of ****** ***********.

*********

** *** *** ***** ******** **** as **** ** ********* *** *** company's ********** *** **** ***, ** least ********, **** ********** *******:

  • "*********. **'** ****** ** *********** ** many ********* ************ *** ** ***** very ********."
  • "*********. **** **** * ****** **** product **** ***** ** **** ****. The ********* ** ****** ****** *** it **** * **** *** ** detecting *****."
  • "********* ** * ****** ** **** used *** ********** ******. **** ******** with ***** ******* ** ***** * comprehensive ** **** *******. * *** this ** *** ****** ***** * good ******* ** **** ******* ******* Corona / ****."
  • "*********...**** ** ***** **'** ***** ** terms ** ***********, ******* ** ****** spoofing *** ********."
  • "*********. ** ****** ** **** ****, and **** **** *******."
  • "**** *** ********* ******** * **** seen ********* ** *** **** ***. I **** **** ******** **** ***** of ** *** *** ******* ***** really ****. ********** *** ****** *******."
  • "********* *** **** *** **** ******** out ** *** *** **** * have ******** ****'** ****. *'* **** there *** ****** *** ***** **** could ** ******."
  • "*********, *** ** *** *** *’** seen **** **** **** ****."
  • "********* *** ** *** *********** ** terms ** ********* ** ********* ********. But *** *** **** ** **** do *** **** ***** *** ******** hardware ** **** ***** *******."

*******, ***:********* ****** *********** ******.

*******,********* *** ***** *********** *********** ********** ***** * **** ******* ****** than *** ***** **** * **** ago **** ******* **** *******.

Other *********

** ***** ***** *** ********* **** regularity, **** **** ****** ***** ************ mentioned. ***** ***** ************ *****:

  • "*******'* *********** * *** **** ****-***** and ***** ****, **** ******* * was ****** ****. ******* ******* ** trying *** ****** ** **** ******* applications."
  • "* ******** ***'* **** ******* * have *** ** *** *** ** them. ********* ** ***** ******* ** on ** ***** ******."
  • "** **** * *********** ** **** cameras **** ** **** **** ******** like ****."
  • "* **** ******* **** ********* ****. That ** *** ** *** **** manufacturers ******* ** *** ********* ** solution ********* *** ***** ** ******* into ******** ******** *****."
  • "*********. ******* ** ***** *** **** are ***** ** **** ****** ***** makes **** ****** **********."
  • "* ** **** ******** **** ******** and ******* ** ***** *********, *** just **** ****** ***********, *** ***** analytics. **** ********* ** *** ***** and *** *** ******* ** *********** solely *** **** *****."
  • "********* ***** ***** *** ** *** uses *** *** ***** ******* ** long ** **** **** *** ***** and *** ********* *****."
  • "* *** **** ***** *** ******* and ***** ***** *** *** **** we **** ****. ******* ** ****** good **** ** ***** ** **** of *** *** ********, * **** to *** **-**% ** **** ** have ***********, ***** ****** ****** ** very ********** *** ** *****'* ****** work."
  • "** **** ******* *** *** ***** solutions. **** **** **** ******* **** installed *********. ***** *** * **** Genetec ***********. *** ******** ** **** good ***, ********* *** ** ** not **** ** ********** ** **** really **** ** **** ***** ******** and ** **** ****** **** ** develop **." [****: ********,*** *** **** **** **** ************ offering ****** ***********.]

*******

***** ****** *********** **** ******** ** be * ***** ****** ******, **** the *********** ** *** ******** **** would **** ****** **** ** ** the ******, ****** *** ** ******* weak, **** ******* ******* *********** ********* in **********. ******* ****** *********** **** boom, ******* ****, ** ****** ******* with ********** ******* ** ** ****.

Comments (7)

Hi. Definitely facial recognition should be regulated. Thx.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

There are another brands much accurate and highest performance like NEC , Cyberextruder , Cognitec than Anyvision I tested Anyvision in a non controled environment also HERTA and were the ones that give the worst results. For high challenge scenarios in my opinion are not the best choice.

Agree
Disagree: 2
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

I've had one customer ask about it for his apartment blocks that have constant problems with serious crime.

My response was, "You can't afford it."

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Counterpoint: TVT / InVid Facial Recognition Tested

That’s not to say it’s going to work well but there are a number of really low cost options.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

I've had one customer ask about it for his apartment blocks that have constant problems with serious crime.

My response was, "You can't afford it."

This used to be much more commona decade or so ago. I would hear this request every single time we quoted a surveillance system. Facial recognition comes up rarely now. Even now that facial recognition is not particularly costly customers still ask about it, see the quote and deprioritize facial recognition in favor of more coverage or just fixing whatever 20 year old analog camera isn't working. I have heard "we pushed it to the next year budget" so many times I cannot count. As with switching to secure non-prox credentials something always seems to be slipped in front for budget consumption. Your method of instantly shutting the request down seems a better use of time.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Face recognition will become one of the most requested forms of security due to covid. Only the manufacturers that have been selling these products for many years know what they are doing and their products work. Others like Invid who buys from anyone and will sell to everyone, which relabels uniview or Longse are not very good and they are cheap and Chinese made. Same with Hik and Dahua as they sell to anyone. Good facial readers cost more because they work. $1300 dealer cost is not that expensive for a reader that is a proven product.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

The $1300 dealer cost item is overly specific. What product are you speaking of Undisclosed Manufacturer #3?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts reporting, tutorials and software funded by subscriber's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Loading Related Reports