Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators

By: IPVM Team, Published on Jul 07, 2020

While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of security systems integrators shows weak sales, opposition to regulation, and no clear favorite provider.

IPVM Image

Inside this report, based on 200+ integrator responses, we explain:

  • Whether and why they are selling facial recognition or not
  • What manufacturer they believe offers the best facial recognition
  • Whether and why facial recognition should be regulated

***** ****** *********** *** gained ******* **********, * new **** ***** ** security ******* *********** ***** weak *****, ********** ** regulation, *** ** ***** favorite ********.

IPVM Image

****** **** ******, ***** on ***+ ********** *********, we *******:

  • ******* *** *** **** are ******* ****** *********** or ***
  • **** ************ **** ******* offers *** **** ****** recognition
  • ******* *** *** ****** recognition ****** ** *********

[***************]

Executive *******

**** *****:

  • **** *****: **** *** *********** are ******* ****** *********** most ******** ****** *** customer ******, ******** ***** high ******, **** *******, and **** ******** *********** like **** ******* ***** weak.
  • *********** ******: ******* **** **** with ********* ******** ** mask ********* *** **** temperature *******, ******* **** recognition ******** *** ***** purchased ** *** ********* used *** '********' ******** but '******' ********** *******.
  • ****-**********: * ******** ******** are ******* ****** *********** being ********* **** *** key ****** ***** ******** of ********** ** ****** regulate ******* ******** * risk ******.
  • ** ***** '****': ***** *** *** selling ****** ***********, **************, there *** ** ***** best. ***** *** ******** that *** * ********, Anyvision *** ******** **** mentioned *** ****.

Few ***** ****** ***********

** ***** ** *** most ****** ****** *** little ** ** **** recognition *** ** ****** weak ***-**** ******. ******* customers ** *** ******* a **** ** ****** to ******* **, *********** and ********* ** *** have ***** ********.

*****, ****** ***** ******* concerns ***** ******* *** the ********* ********* ** resellers ** * ******* reason *** **** **** rec *******. ** ******, several ********* ******* ******** * ***********, *** to ********** ************.

No **** *********** ******

*** **** ****** ***** was ****** ******:

  • "*** *********. ** ****’* really **** *********."
  • "**. **** **** ********* with **** ********* ** the ****** *** *****'* had * **** **** from *** ****** **** it ** * ****."
  • "**. * **** *** had * ****** ****** ask *** **."
  • "***** *** **** ******* interest. *** ** *** national ********* *** ******* into ** *** ******* more **** * ********** at **** *****."
  • "**, * *****'* *** many ** ** *** customers ********* ****** ***********"
  • "**. ** ******** *** it *** ** ******* "gimmicky" ** **. ** don't **** ***** ****** thing **** ***** ***. Ours ** * ************ company, *** * *********** company. ** *** **** there ** * ********** use **** *** **** reliability ** ***** **** to *** ** ** our *********."
  • "**. ***** *** *** been * ****** *** it **** ** ******** base."
  • "****. **** *** ********* are ****** *** ** and *** **** **** does *** ***** ****** funding/budget *** **************."
  • "**. *** ********* **** not ***** *** **."
  • "** *** ***. ** have *** **** ****** for ** ** ***."
  • "**, ** **** ** the ******* ** **** with."
  • "** ******* **** ** interest ** ****."
  • "**, *****'* *** *** clients *** **** ** yet."
  • "*** ***. **** *** had **** ******* **** customers."
  • "***, *** **** ********."
  • "**. ****'* ***** ***** for **."
  • "**. *** ********* **** not ***** *** **."
  • "** ******** **** *********."
  • "**, **** ** *** customers ** *** ******* this **** ** *******."
  • "*** *** ****. *** too **** ** * demand **** *********."
  • "**. ** ****** *** it **** *** *********"
  • "**. *** **** ** customers **** ***** ***."
  • "** ********* *** ** for **."
  • "** *******, **** ****, but ******* *******."
  • "**, ** **** * small ****** *** **** type ** *******."
  • "** **** **** *** facial *********** *** ** all. ** *** **** hasn’t **** * **** for ********* ***."

Privacy ******

****** ******* ** *** potential ***** *** ****-********** deployments ** ******** ****** for *** **** ***** collected ** *** *******. Indeed, ***** *********** **** the ******** ******** *** benefits ** **** *****:

  • "**, ****** *********** ** a *** ****** *****. Having ** ******* **** tied ** ** ** system ** ******* *** a ****** ** **** point. ** **** ** avoiding ** ***** *** underlying **** ** ******** or ** ********* ******* (private **. ******)."
  • "**** - *** *** can ** ***** **** we ***'* **** ** mess ****. *** ********* liability *** ********* *** real ********. ...*** **** rec ***'* ****** **** useful *** *** ******* applications."
  • "**. *** **********. * big *********."
  • "**. *** *********** **** technology *** ***********. ********* liability ********. ******** ***** with *********** ********* *** of *** *******."
  • "**** ** ******* *** not **** ******** **** clients. ******** ** ******* to *** **** *** government ** ***** ** do ***** ***********."
  • "**. *****'* *** * very *** ****** *** it *** *** * also **** ******** ***** liability *** ***********."
  • "**. *** ********* **** that ** ** ** intrusion ** *** ******* of ***** *********."
  • "**. ** *** ** the ************ ******* *** most ******* ***** *** too ********."
  • "** *** ****** ** part ** *** ************ system *** ** *****'* had *** ******* ***** today. **** ** * major ****** **** ******* facial *********** *** ********* are **** ********* ***** getting ** *******."

GDPR ********

********** ****** ** *** EU ***** *** *********** against ******* **** *********** is ********** ** * national *****, *** **** if ******** ********* * system ** * ********* way ** ** ****** it *********** ******* ** from *************:

  • "**, **** *** **********'* laws *** **** ****** about ****** ***********. ****** impossible ** **** ********** to *******."
  • "** ** **** ***** apply."
  • "**** **** **** **** so **** ** *** wants ** ** **."
  • "**. ** ****** *** it *** *** ** GDPR **********."
  • "**, ********** ** *** in *******"
  • "** ******, ** ** not *******, ** **** restricted. *** ******** ** record ********."

Too *********

******* ** *** '** customer ******' ************ *** that **** *********** *********** and ******* **** *** much ** ******* ***** price:

  • "*** ******** ***** **** at * ****** ***** point **** **** ** my ********* *** *** willing ** *****."
  • "**. ** **** ******* people *** *** ** but **** **** *** how **** ** ***** they **** ** *** be **** ********** *******."
  • "**, ****** *** ********* for *********."
  • "** **** **** *** a ***** ****** ** inquiries *** ** *** are *** ********** ** selling ***** **** **** doesn't ****, ****** *** not ********** ** ****** for * "****** ********" so ** **** ****** them **** * **********."
  • "**, *** *'* **********. It's ********* *** **'* so **** **** ****** than **** *** ****** control."
  • "******** **** **** * high ***** ***."
  • "***, ** *** * lot ** *********, *** was *** *********."
  • "*** ********* ******* ****** recognition *******. ********* ****'* that ********** ** ******* it **** **** *** get * ****** ** do * **** *** show **** *** *****. It *** ***** **** to ****."
  • "*** ******, *** *** customers **** **** **** interested ** *** **** recognition ** *********** *** mask **** **** * bit ***** ** *** cost :)"
  • "**, ******* ***** *** way *** **** *** most ** *** ******* models *** *** * one **** ****."
  • "******** ** ****, *** customers **** **** ******* for **."
  • "*** *** ***** ***** high ** *******"
  • "** **** **** ********* a ***, *** *** price ** ***** * sticking *****."
  • "*** * ****** *** it ** ********* ******* most ****** *** *** cheap"
  • "***** *** **** ** sell **** *********** ** access *******. *******, ******* don’t **** ** ***** $$."

*** ******* ******* ** interesting ***** **** ******* are **** ********* (*.*., Anyvision, *****, ***) ***** others, ****** **** *****, are *********** ****** ****** recognition ****. *******, *** the *****, *** ***** has *******, ** ***** temporarily ** ***** *******.

Coronavirus ******* ********

*******, ********* ****** ***-**** requests *** **** *********** often ********* *********** ** a ******. ******* ******* face *********** ********* **** perform **** ********* ***/** body *********** ********, **** recognition ******* *** ****:

  • "***. *** ****** ******* that ******** ******** ********* can *** ** **** right *** *** ** COVID19."
  • "***, **** ********* **** been ********* ****** *********** with *** ******** ******* cameras ** **** ******."
  • "***. ** *** ****** in ***** ** **** recognition ** ** ******* user ******** *********** **** the ****** ******* **** safety *** *** ****** and *** ** ***** chances ** ********* *** infections ***** **** **** recognition ******** ** ***********."
  • "** **** ******* ******* the ****** ******* *** temp. *** **** ****** but ** *** ******* the ******** *** ******** features *** ****** ******* or ***** *** ***********."
  • "**** **, ** **** a *********** *** **** mask ********** ******** **** uses **** ********* ** part ** ********* *** temperature *** ****."
  • "***, ****** **** *** in **** ** *********** readers."
  • "** **** *** **** 2 ******** *** **** and *** *** **** into *** **** ****."
  • "********* ***'* **** *** need. *** ******* ******* is ********* * ****/**** tablet *** ** ****'* by ********."
  • "***, *** *** ****** for *** ************** ** biometric **************. **** *****, just ** *** * face *** ******* ** not ******* ** ******* a ****."
  • "*** ******* **** *** started ** *** ******* many **** *** ****** aware **** *** ***** emergency ********** * ****** security *******. **** ****** that ** ** * health ******* **** *** not * ****** ******** problem."
  • "***, *** ******* ******* and *** ***** **** mask (**** **** *********)"

No ********** ** ****** ***********

*** ******** ** *********** were '**' ** **********, with **** ******** ******* regulation, ****** ********** ****-***** and ******* ********** *************** in ***** ********** ***** as *** ******* ******:

  • "** ***** ** **** if ***** **** *********** standards *** ***********, ********, and ******** ** * reference, *** * ***'* think ** ***** **********."
  • "**. *** ********** ********* too **** *******."
  • "**!!!"
  • "**, ** * ******** wants ** ********* **, that's ** ****. ** an ******** ** ******** doesn't **** **. **** can ** ******** *********."
  • "**. *** ********** *****'* do **** ****. *** regulation ***** ** ****** handled ** ****** ******* IMHO."
  • "**, ***** *** *** more ********* ****** **** the ********** ***** ** focus ** ******* ****** recognition."
  • "*****! **** ****** *** right *** *** ********** can't ** ******* ** regulate ******** ******* ******** it **. *** **** is ********* *** ****** with *** ********** ******* me *** ****."
  • "* ** *** *** increased **** ********** ** most ****** ******* ***’* going ** ******** *** government?"
  • "* ***'* ********** *** it ****** ** ********* and ********** ** ******* property."
  • "**. *** ********** ****** tends ** ****-********, ***** drives *** **** ** the ******* ** *** slows **** *** ******** of *** ********."
  • "**, * **** ******* to ****, *** **** crazy ****** *** *****"
  • "**. **** ***'* ******** sh*t."
  • "** ***** ** *** goal **** ******* *** government. **** **** *** technical ********* ** **** any ********* **********."
  • "**, **'* ***** *** law ***********. ** ** had ** ** ********* the ********** ******* ***** be *******."
  • "*'* * ***********, *'* going ** ** ** outlier ****."
  • "* ***'* ***** ******** should ** ********* ** the **********. ** **** too **** ********** *******."
  • "**"
  • "**. **'* **** ** properly ******** **** *** don't **********."
  • "**, * **** ********** regulation, ** ******* ***** everyone ****."
  • "**. **** **** **** cause *** ********** ** be **** *********. ** will **** **** *** process *** ***** ********** in ********. *** ********* should **** ************ ** place *** ****** ** handled **** *** ***** Personally ************ ***********. ********** know *** ** ** this."
  • "**, **'* *** ** invasion ** ******* **'* a **** ********* ************* tool"
  • "**. *** ********** ******* has *** **** ********** on ******."
  • "**, * ** ****** that *** ********** **** only **** ** *** whole *****."
  • "**. * *** *** demand *** ******** ** greater **** ********. ** course, ** ** ** used *** ********* *** consumer ****** ***********, **** it ***** **** **********."
  • "* ***'* ***** ** should ** *********. ***** are **** *** **** to **. * ***** it *******'* ** ********* due ** *** ***** we **** **. ********** employees ********* ***** ***** fire, **** ********, ***."
  • "**. ** ***'** *** doing ******** ***** *****'* nothing ** ** ********* about. ** ***'* **** more ***********."
  • "**."
  • "*** * *** ** the ********** ********** ******** in ******* **** *** track ****** **** ****."
  • "**, ** *** ********* body ****** ********* ****** recognition. ************, *********, *** accuracy ***** ** *******/****** in ***** ** *** party."
  • "*** ** *** ******* stops ** **** ************* anybody ** * ****** area ** ****** ***** about ******* ******** **** them ** **** ** London ** *** ********** to ******* **********."
  • "**. ******, *** ******* and ******! ** *** not * ********* ********** like ***** ***** ***** so **** ** ******** us ** **** *********."
  • "** **** (*** **********) screw ** ********** **** touch"

Yes, **** **** *********** ***********/****

*******, **** ***** '***', that *********** *** ** least **** **** ********** use *** ******, ********** for ******* **** ** public ****** ** ********** entities:

  • "***, * ***** ***** should ** *********** ** how ** ** **** and *** **** *** can ***** ****."
  • "* **** ****** *** govt. ******* ******** *** this **** ***** ** exploited *** **** *** things."
  • "* ******* ** * passive *****, ***. *** issue ** **** *** confront ******* ***** ** detection *** *** ****** was *****. *** **** can ** *******, *** can **** ** **** improperly. **** *****, ** can **** ***** **** aren’t *********."
  • "***, *** *********** ****** not ** ***** ** at **** **** ******* its ***** *** * reliable **********. *** ********** should *** ************ ** use ***** ********** ** way **** ********."
  • "* ** ********* * minimum ********** ****-****** ******. But, ***** *** ****** those *** ******** *** technology *** ***-****** ******. I ***** ***** ***** to ** **** **** of ******** *** **** is ******* ** ** done **** *** *********** or ******* ** *** product ** ************* *** there **** ****** ** someone *** ***** *** technology *** ****** ** in * *** **** was *** ********. ***** outliers ****** *** ******* the ************ ** **** solutions *** *** ******** to ******* *** *** minority. *** *********** ** the *** ** *** deterrent."
  • "** * ****** **** guidelines/regulation **** ****** ***, the ******** ** *** storage ** *** ****** images ****** *********."
  • "***, ***** ****** ** a ***** ** *** it ** **** *** the ******** ******* ***** a ******* ****** ** time."
  • "***. *** **** ******* (integrators *** *******) *** sell ** ****** ****."
  • "******* **** ********** ** required ** *** **'* used ******* *** ***** has ****** **** ****** most ** *** ** population *** **, ********, etc. *** ***** ******** I *** **** ********** negativity ***** *** ********** is "** *** ****/*** on ********"?"
  • "**********, *** ** ******. Clear *** ** ************ for *** *** **** importantly **** **** **** can ** **** ***. FR **** ** ******* from *** *** *** marketing."
  • "***, ******* ** **-**** use *** *** ****** the ****."
  • "***, ** ***** *** be ********** ************ ** stockpiling ******** ************** ***********."
  • "***. *** ********** ** not ******** *** **'* invasive. *** ********** *** should ******* ********** ************ and ***-***. ********** ********; e.g. **/*****, ***. ****** not ** **** ** store/use ******* ***** ******** user ***-*** ******* ********** the **** (*.*.*********** ****** to **, ******, ***. unless **** ******* ** the ****** ********** ** data)"
  • "***, ** ** * powerful ********** **** **** people *** *** ***** aware ** *** ************ of ***** **."
  • "***, ***** ****** ** standards ******* *** *********** concerning ******* *** ******* of **** ***********. ********* should *** ** ******* to **** ** ******* that **** ** ****** else. ******* ** *** HIPAA ***** *** *** nearly ** *********."

Uncertain/Mixed *******

*** ********* ******* ***** were *****, ****** ******* distrust **** ****** ********** or ******* ********* ** good ****** ** *** situations ** ***** ****. Indeed, ***** '*** ********** risk' *** *********, ** too *** '******* ****** abuse' ** *** **** data:

  • "*** ** *** ** abuse **** *** ** as *** ** ****** the ********** *** **** speck ** *****."
  • "* ** ** ** the *** ** **** one. **** ** ** says ** ** *** government *** ****** ********** on ******** *** *** personal *****. ** *** other ****, ** ******** should ** *********. ** the ***** *****, **** can ** **** *********. Regulated ** *** ** people **** ** *** the ********** **** **** regulate ** ***."
  • "****'* * ***** ********. I ***** ** ******* on *** ** ***** it, ***'* *** ****** be ****** ********* **** like ***, ***********, *** all ***** ******** ************** methods. ***** *** ** exemptions **** ********* ** convicted *** ********* **** could ******** * ***** list; *** **** *** regulates *** ***** ****, again ** ****** ** highly ********* *** **** to *** ****. ** the ******* ****, * would ****** ** *** use ** ***** ********* for ****** ******* **** an ******** ****** **** less ********** **** ***** pools **** *** ******** the ******* ********. **** should ** ********* **** the ***'*."
  • "*** ****. * ***** the **** **** **** to ********* ******* ******** vs ****** ******. ** my **** ** ******* or ** ***** ******* on ******* ******** *** right ** *** ******** owner. *** ****. ****’* a **** ******."
  • "****** **** ** **** one. *** ********* ******** for ****** *** ******** are ********, *** *** potential (*/* ****** ****) misuse ** ** ** of ***** *******. ***** it **** ******, ********** with ****** ** *****, we **** *********!"
  • "********* *** **** ********** I ******* ***** ** appropriate ** ************ ******* use ** * ************** manner. *** **** ***** walk * **** ****: for *******, ** ** organization ***** ** ****** for ******* ** * political ******** ***** ***** perceived ******* **** ****** violence, **** ***** ** too ***** ** ************** against ********* ***** ***********."
  • "*** *** **. **** is * ******** *****. There ****** ** **** regulation *** **** *** another **** ** *** brother ******** *** **** in *** ***."
  • "********* ** ** *********** have ****** ** ******* and *** ** "*******" but ***** ** ***** to ********** **** ** comes ** *********** ****** offenders. ** **** **** I ** *** **** what ********* **** ****** provide *********."
  • "* ***** ********* ****** be ***** **** * given ******** ** ***** facial ***********, *** **** is *** ****** ** the *********** **** ****** be *******. **'* ******* prolific ** *** ***- tracking **** ********- ***** is **** **** *********. We *******'* ** ******** to **** ** ****** innovation ***** **** **** hurt *** *********** **** when ********* **** ************* firms."
  • "*** *** **. *** because ****** * ****** standard **** **** *** end ********* * ******* ground *** ********** *** solutions. *** ******* **** will ****** **** ********** privacy ** **** ********* No, **** **** ***** vendor ************."
  • "**** *** ** *********. I ******* **** ** is *** ***** ** start ******* ***** ****** recognition ****** ********** ** they *** **** **** areas."

No ***** **** ****** ******** *** ********* **** *******

*** ******** ** ******* did *** **** * preferred **** *********** *****, and **** ***** ** or **** ****** ********** with *** ******* ** all. ** *** ******** that *** * ********, Avigilon *** ********* **** cited **** *****, **** no ***** ***** ***** mentioned **** **** * handful ** *****.

********

***** ******** *** **** been ******** ****** *********** for * ***** ****, they ********* **** ********'* overall ******** ** *** market:

  • "** *** ******* ******** since ** *** ** Elite+ *******. ** ** are ******* **** *** performance **** **** ** what ** **** ****."
  • "****** **** ******* ******** recently *** * **** been ********* *** **** it *****."
  • "[** *** *******] ** find ******** **** **** good ********** ******* ** best. *** *** **** very ******** ** ********* for * ***** ****** that *** **** ******** in ***** ** ********* across *** ****** ***** system **** *******. **'* also ***** **** ** use *** **** **** accurate ** **************."
  • "******** ***** ** **** the **** ********** *** of *** ******* ** use. ******** ** *********."
  • "* ***** ******** ******** has *** **** ******* it ** ***** ********** into *** ********, *** there *** ******* **** are ***** ** **** them * *** *** their *****."
  • "********. **** ** ******** research."
  • "* ***** ******** *** the **** ********* ** the ****** ***** ***."
  • "********---** *** *****'* **** a ****** ******** ********."
  • "** *** ******* ******** currently, ** *** **** a ****** ******* ** far *** **** **** to **** ** **** seen **** **** ********** results - *** **** why ** ***'* **********."
  • "**** ******* ** *** of *** ***** *****, Avigilon ** ********* ********* recognition *** ** ***** into *** ********** ********, not * ***** ***** addon."

*******, ***:******** ****** *********** '********** Alerts' ******.

** ********, ***** ******** competitors **** **** *** Hanwha ** *** (** least ***) ***** ***** own ****** ***********. ***** and ********* ********* ** offer ****** *********** ****** that *** **** ************* for *** ** ***** of ****** ***********.

*********

** *** *** ***** anywhere **** ** **** as ********* *** *** company's ********** *** **** off, ** ***** ********, with ********** *******:

  • "*********. **'** ****** ** extensively ** **** ********* environments *** ** ***** very ********."
  • "*********. **** **** * really **** ******* **** seems ** **** ****. The ********* ** ****** clunky *** ** **** a **** *** ** detecting *****."
  • "********* ** * ****** we **** **** *** personally ******. **** ******** with ***** ******* ** build * ************* ** from *******. * *** this ** *** ****** being * **** ******* if **** ******* ******* Corona / ****."
  • "*********...**** ** ***** **'** found ** ***** ** reliability, ******* ** ****** spoofing *** ********."
  • "*********. ** ****** ** real ****, *** **** good *******."
  • "**** *** ********* ******** I **** **** ********* is *** **** ***. I **** **** ******** live ***** ** ** and *** ******* ***** really ****. ********** *** latest *******."
  • "********* *** **** *** best ******** *** ** the *** **** * have ******** ****'** ****. I'm **** ***** *** others *** ***** **** could ** ******."
  • "*********, *** ** *** few *’** **** **** work **** ****."
  • "********* *** ** *** flexibility ** ***** ** deploying ** ********* ********. But *** *** **** is **** ** *** have ***** *** ******** hardware ** **** ***** engines."

*******, ***:********* ****** *********** ******.

*******,********* *** ***** *********** significant ********** ***** * **** tougher ****** **** *** hopes **** * **** ago **** ******* **** *******.

Other *********

** ***** ***** *** mentioned **** **********, **** most ****** ***** ************ mentioned. ***** ***** ************ cited:

  • "*******'* *********** * *** been ****-***** *** ***** fast, **** ******* * was ****** ****. ******* forward ** ****** *** Idemia ** **** ******* applications."
  • "* ******** ***'* **** because * **** *** to *** *** ** them. ********* ** ***** popping ** ** ** radar ******."
  • "** **** * *********** of **** ******* **** an **** **** ******** like ****."
  • "* **** ******* **** Panasonic ****. **** ** one ** *** **** manufacturers ******* ** *** portfolio ** ******** ********* and ***** ** ******* into ******** ******** *****."
  • "*********. ******* ** ***** and **** *** ***** on **** ****** ***** makes **** ****** **********."
  • "* ** **** ******** with ******** *** ******* in ***** *********, *** just **** ****** ***********, but ***** *********. **** developed ** *** ***** and *** *** ******* it *********** ****** *** more *****."
  • "********* ***** ***** *** us *** **** *** the ***** ******* ** long ** **** **** the ***** *** *** installed *****."
  • "* *** **** ***** for ******* *** ***** which *** *** **** we **** ****. ******* is ****** **** **** it ***** ** **** of *** *** ********, I **** ** *** 85-90% ** **** ** have ***********, ***** ****** system ** **** ********** and ** *****'* ****** work."
  • "** **** ******* *** and ***** *********. **** give **** ******* **** installed *********. ***** *** a **** ******* ***********. IBM ******** ** **** good ***, ********* *** it ** *** **** to ********** ** **** really **** ** **** their ******** *** ** they ****** **** ** develop **." [****: ********,*** *** **** **** have ************ ******** ****** recognition.]

*******

***** ****** *********** **** continue ** ** * major ****** ******, **** the *********** ** *** industry **** ***** **** likely **** ** ** the ******, ****** *** it ******* ****, **** without ******* *********** ********* in **********. ******* ****** recognition **** ****, ******* this, ** ****** ******* with ********** ******* ** be ****.

Comments (7)

**. ********** ****** *********** should ** *********. ***.

***** *** ******* ****** much ******** *** ******* performance **** *** , Cyberextruder , ******** **** Anyvision * ****** ********* in * *** ********* environment **** ***** *** were *** **** **** give *** ***** *******. For **** ********* ********* in ** ******* *** not *** **** ******.

*'** *** *** ******** ask ***** ** *** his ********* ****** **** have ******** ******** **** serious *****.

** ******** ***, "*** can't ****** **."

************:*** / ***** ****** Recognition ******

****’* *** ** *** it’s ***** ** **** well *** ***** *** a ****** ** ****** low **** *******.

*'** *** *** ******** ask ***** ** *** his ********* ****** **** have ******** ******** **** serious *****.

** ******** ***, "*** can't ****** **."

**** **** ** ** much **** ******* ****** or ** ***. * would **** **** ******* every ****** **** ** quoted * ************ ******. Facial *********** ***** ** rarely ***. **** *** that ****** *********** ** not ************ ****** ********* still *** ***** **, see *** ***** *** deprioritize ****** *********** ** favor ** **** ******** or **** ****** ******** 20 **** *** ****** camera ***'* *******. * have ***** "** ****** it ** *** **** year ******" ** **** times * ****** *****. As **** ********* ** secure ***-**** *********** ********* always ***** ** ** slipped ** ***** *** budget ***********. **** ****** of ********* ******** *** request **** ***** * better *** ** ****.

**** *********** **** ****** one ** *** **** requested ***** ** ******** due ** *****. **** the ************* **** **** been ******* ***** ******** for **** ***** **** what **** *** ***** and ***** ******** ****. Others **** ***** *** buys **** ****** *** will **** ** ********, which ******** ******* ** Longse *** *** **** good *** **** *** cheap *** ******* ****. Same **** *** *** Dahua ** **** **** to ******. **** ****** readers **** **** ******* they ****. $**** ****** cost ** *** **** expensive *** * ****** that ** * ****** product.

*** $**** ****** **** item ** ****** ********. What ******* *** *** speaking ** *********** ************ #3?

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,438 reports, 865 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new...
Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020,...
Integrators Hard Hit By Coronavirus on Mar 18, 2020
Integrators are already being hard hit by Coronavirus as brand new IPVM...
Worst Camera Manufacturers 2020 on May 06, 2020
Which camera manufacturer have integrators had the worst experience with in...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop,...
Coronavirus Hits Manufacturers, Standing Now, Worse To Come on Apr 06, 2020
Coronavirus is hitting security manufacturers, though overall modestly for...
Beware Of Feevr on Apr 14, 2020
Beware of "Feevr". The company is marketing a 'Feevr' solution that...
Pivot3 Mass Layoffs on Mar 27, 2020
Pivot3 has conducted mass layoffs, the culmination of grand hopes, a quarter...
New: Mobile Access Proxy Releases 'World's Smallest Mobile Reader' on Mar 04, 2020
Mobile access provider Proxy claims its new Nano is 'the world’s smallest...
Manufacturers Not Interested in October 2020 ISC West Show on Apr 13, 2020
Manufacturers overwhelmingly say they are not interested in going to the...
IPVM For PR / Marketing People on Apr 29, 2020
Since IPVM does not accept advertising nor sponsorships, etc., PR / marketing...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...