Door Controllers Guide

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Mar 19, 2013

Access Control systems may have hundreds of parts, but door controllers are in the center of them all. While these devices are often buried inside steel junction boxes or hidden inside drop ceilings, they are the central component that ties everything else together. In this note, we examine controllers, their main features, and look at were they schematically fit within most systems.

Which Controller Do I Pick?

Unlike mixing and matching controllers between manufacturers is not like selecting cameras and VMS software. Unlike video systems, access control systems require proprietary equipment at the door that functions with the head end panel or server. As a result, there is no selecting between different manufacturers for controllers, but a manufacturer may offer a range of of controller options depending on the number of doors it is designed to control.

The Key to the System

Door Controllers are common to most every access system, and primarily consolidate all other devices into one spot. Every reader, sensor, and lock must be tied into 'the system' and the controller is where that happens. Whether it is called a 'controller', 'door module', or 'access computer', the controller has one function: bridge the gap between software and hardware.

While the forms the controller takes vary based from system to system, they perform the same task and are generally installed close to the door being controlled. Depending on component design, the controller may be designed in one of the following ways:

  • 'Can' Enclosure Type: The 'traditional' controller a printed circuit board housed in a small electrical enclosure or 'can'. The box is typically wall or ceiling mounted above a door, and all wiring passes through knock-outs in the can to terminal blocks on the board.
  • Standalone Device: A newer controller form factor, the shape closely resembles an analog video encoder or small appliance, where the terminations of all connected components are made into a self-contained box. This form factor is common with single door controllers and managed access systems.
  • Combo Reader/Controller: Sometimes the credential reader is integrated directly with the door controller in a variation of the 'standalone' type. However, while offering cost savings due to decreased installation labor, this type of architecture often is a security liability, with the vulnerable controller being mounted along with the reader on the 'unsecured' side of the door.

Regardless of form factor, the features of a controller are similar. In the image below, we have marked the common 'tie-in' points between other access control components and the door controller:

In the sections below, we group and describe the primary features and common integrations of a controller, including:

  • Commmunication: How does the controller communicate with the 'master panel' or server at the head end?
  • Inputs: Which types of devices feed information to the controller?
  • Outputs: Which types of devices are controlled by the controller's logic and system commands?
  • Power: How is power handled by the controller, and how are attached devices powered?

Communication

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Like video surveillance, both analog and IP versions of controllers are available and used. However, unlike video, the migration to IP has been much slower due to limited enhancement to move IP. Regardless of how they communicate, door controllers typically offer the same basic function, and connectivity is a simple buying preference for the customer.

  • Ethernet: Like IP video cameras, controllers can be built with RJ45 ports so they can be connected to LANs like any networked device. However, even if a controller is networked, it may not use TCP/IP addressing and may not be accessible through onboard web-server. In some cases, ethernet connectivity is simply to eliminate running a redundant network. Also, while becoming more common, not all access systems offer controllers with ethernet connectivity and the feature is subject to confirmation on cutsheets.  

Increasingly, '3rd Party' controllers are becoming popular. The manufacturers of these particular ethernet controllers sell their devices for resell by access management software companies, or as single/small system standalone devices through standard distribution or even public internet distribution:

IPVM has covered several of these IP controllers in default standalone configurations, including:

  • Serial: Using RS-232, RS-485, and Weigand has been the mainstay communication method of access controllers for decades. Often, communication with other devices is handled through directly connecting devices to the controller by way of a dedicated 'cabling harness' that is manually punched down or terminated directly to control boards. Unlike an ethernet connected device, troubleshooting serial connections involve more than 'ping' commands, and chasing down issues often takes place with a multimeter or continuity tester.

Even if an access system is installed as 'serial', it still can be configured to use LAN cabling with the addition of 'Device Servers' not unlike video baluns. While these small devices cost ~$100 per end, they can be used to bring serial-only controllers onto the LAN to communicate with 'master panels' located offsite.


Integration between the Access System and a VMS system typically takes place at the 'main controller' panel that is networked much like a DVR unit is integrated with a VMS. When an access system is ethernet networked, it often is to take advantage of existing LAN cabling, to use a cloud-based 'hosted' solution, or to eliminate running a proprietary serial-type network that cannot be maintained by in-house IT staff. We look deeper at the contrast between serial and ethernet access systems in our 'IP Readers vs. Control Panels' report.

Inputs

The purpose of inputs are to 'feed' information into the access system. The number and types of inputs connected to the controller vary, but all controllers accept the basic types listed below:

  • Readers: The most exposed, public facing access control component is the credential reader. Usually the reader is mounted on the 'unsecured' side of the opening, and potentially exposed to bad weather, vandalism, and is vulnerable to damage. Aside from keeping the controller secure, a detached reader is configurable according to the type of credentials being read, the mounting surface, and the read range, and in most cases the reader is a standalone device connected by a 6-conductor style cable. For more details, catch our 'Selecting Access Control Readers' guide.
  • Contacts: Anything from simple contact door closures to PIR Motion Sensors are connected to controllers to feed 'system status' information to the controller. For example, a 'latch monitor switch' is connected to give the access system feedback on whether a door is locked or not, and door contacts are used to feedback whether a door leaf is in the closed or open position. The range and types of sensors connected to a controller may be determined by code, but functionally are limited only to opening or closing a circuit.
  • Overrides: These type of controller connections include "RTE" or 'Request-To-Exit" devices, use to manually override locks in order to accommodate free egress.
  • Other Systems/Devices: Any number of other devices, including video surveillance cameras, light switches, or perimeter intrusion beams can be connected to door controllers to provide input signals to access systems. The fire alarm system is typically wired into controllers so that a fire alarm condition will override the locks in an emergency.

Outputs

The purpose of outputs are connecting devices controlled by the access system. These devices traditionally are include door locks, but there is a huge range of integrations possible. We go into detail below:

  • Locks: The most common output example are locks like electric strikes, maglocks, and other types of electrified hardware. An output signal interrupts the 'locked' state of the hardware to an 'unlocked' state based on a successful credential read. The controller is the device that interprets a valid read and applies logic to unlock the door.
  • Sirens/Lights: Controllers can also be wired to chime sirens or energize strobes based on inputs. Annunciator can be wired to sound when a door opens, or lights can be wired to energize as someone passes through an opening.
  • Other Systems/Devices: Like input connections, output options are endless, and anything from gasoline pumps, high-voltage machinery, and VMS systems can be triggered and controlled by access control outputs. A common output integration is the triggering of a surveillance camera to record an opening every time a credential is read.

Power

The final system wired into controllers is power, commonly by way of individual power supply, proprietary power distribution unit (PDU), or by PoE connection. The type of power used by controllers is limited to low-voltage AC or DC, and in some cases may be passed-through the controller to power output connected devices.

Passing-through power to devices is a matter of careful consideration. Not all devices are designed to be powered by the controller, and in cases like maglocks the output power may not be sufficient or reliable enough to provide power. The 'power budget' passed through by controllers is often less than 650 mA, and a single maglock or reader can consume the entire resource.

Host Bound vs. Independent

The access control system often must be a 'zero downtime' system and doors must always function. In many enterprise-level access systems, the controllers function independently of the main panel even when communication is lost. This advantage means that a system will operate without interruption according to current configuration regardless if the network is up or not. Most controllers are designed to hold a quantity of transaction data in memory often into the tens of thousands of records until connectivity with the main database is restored.

In contrast, 'host bound' access systems rely on constant communication with a main panel in order to operate. The 'door controller' in these systems is not a true controller at all, but rather an 'input/output' module to tie other devices into the system.

Controller Footprint

The sizing of controllers is typically determined by the number of doors they control. Common sizes are single, double, four, and eight door models. While models supporting a greater number of doors are available, they are not common due to the cost of cabling so many doors to a single device becomes costly.

The number of reader inputs a controller supports is not always equal to the number of doors it can control. Many designers can mistakenly assume 'one reader per opening', however high security applications often require two readers - a 'read in/ read out' application that still only supports a single opening schedule or range of access levels.

Controller Compatibility

In general, access control systems are steeply proprietary. It is uncommon to reuse controllers from one system to another (with notable exceptions like Axis, Mercury, and HID). Furthermore, there is a risk that existing door controllers become obsolete during the course of system upgrades. Reusing controllers outside their current generation of access system is not an option. While other devices like locks, sensors, or even readers may be reused, the controller itself is often relegated to the trash heap.

All-in-One Locks

While not strictly door controllers, standalone electronic access control locksets often feature the same integrations and control available to door controllers but tied into a package that includes the lock, network interface, power supply, and even door position switches.

Increasingly, 'wireless locks' are being promoted by access companies as the least expensive way of adding networked access control to doors difficult to reach with standard wired networks. 

While the door controller component may be factory integrated into the lock, it essentially is still there performing the same functions (even equipped with the same firmware) as discrete door controller devices.

3 reports cite this report:

Lenel vs Software House Markups Analyzed on Oct 14, 2016
This note breaks down and contrasts the markups between two big access brands: Lenel (OnGuard) versus Software House (C-Cure). Our analysis of...
Access Door Controller Configuration Guide on Sep 27, 2016
Properly configuring access control door controllers is key to a professional system. These devices have fundamental settings that must be...
PoE Powered Access Control Guide on Jan 18, 2016
The popularity of Power over Ethernet applications has spilled over into Access Control.  Taking advantage of the general popularity of powering...
Comments (3): PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Paxton Hosted Access - Disruptive Low Dealer Pricing on Jan 19, 2017
Paxton is entering the hosted access game, with BLU, at a cost that is a fraction of key competitors. The different approach could be very...
Smart Power Tools For Security Installs on Jan 18, 2017
Installing a smart camera? Perhaps you should use a 'smart' drill. The intelligent appliance / IoT trend has hit power tools. In this note, we...
Canon 250MP Prototype Targeted At Surveillance on Jan 17, 2017
At one point Axis declared the megapixel race was over, but now parent company Canon is showing an imager that would be a rocket ship in a...
Cut in Half, Everfocus Shifts Strategies on Jan 17, 2017
The race to the bottom impact continues. Now, Everfocus, who used to be one of the larger budget providers, is shifting strategies after years of...
Genetec Favorability Results on Jan 16, 2017
In the race to the bottom and flight to 'solutions', Genetec has taken a contrary path. The company remains independent, focusing up market,...
Free VMS Software Directory on Jan 13, 2017
Many Video Management Software (VMS) providers offer free versions, either open source, for a limited number of cameras or for a limited amount of...
Milestone Essential Subscription Removed on Jan 12, 2017
Subscriptions may be the future for Milestone and VMSes but not right now. Responding to negative feedback, Milestone has removed subscriptions...
IP Networking Course January 2017 on Jan 12, 2017
This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals plus it includes live training, personal help and...
ONVIF Favorability Results on Jan 11, 2017
ONVIF has been one of the most debated aspects of the video surveillance industry. On the one hand, its aim to increase interoperability has been...
Honeywell Ademco Vista Intrusion System Tested on Jan 11, 2017
One of the biggest brands in security holds one of the most common intrusion lines. We bought and tested a Honeywell Vista 15P intrusion...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Vivotek Favorability Results on Jan 20, 2017
Financially, Vivotek is doing relatively well. The company did ~$130 million in 2015 revenue and 2016 revenue (through Q3 reported) was up more...
PR Firm Pleads Don't Scrap PR Spending on Jan 20, 2017
PR is not dying, warns pleads PR firm. Take 40+ year old industry PR firm LRG, who recently lamented the 'misconceptions' that: Traditional PR...
Getting Started With Your IPVM Membership on Jan 20, 2017
Here's how to get started and get the most out of your IPVM membership. Books for Members All members can download the 3 member-only books below...
Jim Cramer Sucks Up To Knightscope on Jan 19, 2017
Credit must be given to Knightscope. They are raising money right now and despite their $80 million pre-money valuation against a lowly sub $1...
ADT Launches Canopy - Professional Monitoring For DIY Devices on Jan 19, 2017
The intrusion industry has criticized DIY security systems for years, claiming systems like Canary or Scout cannot match professionally installed...
Dahua UnFavorability Results on Jan 19, 2017
Dahua, the mega-Chinese surveillance manufacturer not primarily owned by the Chinese government has been trying to break out of the shadow of...
Paxton Hosted Access - Disruptive Low Dealer Pricing on Jan 19, 2017
Paxton is entering the hosted access game, with BLU, at a cost that is a fraction of key competitors. The different approach could be very...
Geovision Launches Direct Cloud Offering on Jan 18, 2017
Add cloud, subtract integrator. Geovision has launched myGVcloud, an offering that allows consumers to buy cameras and cloud services directly...
Anixter / Bosch Sells Direct to Amazon on Jan 18, 2017
Anixter regularly says they do not sell direct to end users or that they do not do it anymore. However, over the past year, Anixter has sold Bosch...
Smart Power Tools For Security Installs on Jan 18, 2017
Installing a smart camera? Perhaps you should use a 'smart' drill. The intelligent appliance / IoT trend has hit power tools. In this note, we...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact