PRC Facial Recognition Firms and Chipmaker Added To US DoD "Chinese Military Companies" List

Published Feb 08, 2024 14:58 PM

The US government has added 14 PRC China firms to its 'Chinese military company' list, including several security technology software developers and a major chip manufacturer.

IPVM Image

This report examines the decision, who it impacts, its implications, how it relates to Dahua and Hikvision, and what it indicates about US-China relations in 2024.

DoD ***** ******, ****, ****, *******, ****** ** "******* ******** *********"

** ******* **, ****, *** ** Department ** ******* (***)********* ** *********** *** **** ** "******* ******** companies."********* ** **** ******* ******** ** ** *) ***** or **********, ******** ** **********, ** the ******'* ********** **** (***) ** CCP's ******* ******** ********** ** *) providing **** **** ******** ************* ** services.

******************* *** **** ** ********* * ********* ***** ******* *****. Security ************* ******* ****** ******* *********,***** ** ****, *** *****,***** ** ****.

**** ***** ***** ********** ** "******* military *********" *** ** ********** **** for *** ******** ********:

  • ******, *** ** *** ***'* ******* facial *********** *** ** *********;
  • ****, ******* ***** ****** ***********/** ********;
  • *******, **** *** ***'******** *** ********;
  • ****, * ***** *** ************* ************ of ***** ****** **** ****** ** IoT ********, ** ********** ***** *********.

**** ***** ******* ******* ********, * *********$** ********** ******* ******* **** **** *********** in ******* *** ********** *********,****** ********** **., ***., * ***** *** ******* *** leak ******** ************, *** ****************** *** radar *************** ****** ******* & ********** **.

DoD ************ *** *** ********* + ****** ********

***** ***** ***** ** ***'* ************, IPVM ********* ** ******** ** *** current ***** ** **-***** *********, ********** that ******* ********* ******* *** ********** companies *** ******** ** ***** ***** at ***** ***** *** **** *.*. presidential ********.

***:*** *** ***** ************ ******** ***** After **** ********

*** ********** *** ******* ** *** Treasury **********'* ****-******* *** *********, *** this ***** ****** *** ******** ** whether *** ***'* ****** ********* ************* have *******.

** ****** **** ** **** *** represent * *********** ****** ** **-***** relations ** *** *********** ** *********. DoD *********** ** * "******* ******** company" ** *** * **** ** sanctions. ** ** ****** ********* ** an *********** ** **** ** *** US ********** *** *** ** ******** consequences.

** ** ****, ** ******* ********, the *********** *** ***** ************ ******:

***** ***** ****** ** *** **** doesn't ******* ********* ****, ** *** be * **** ** ********** *********' reputations *** ********** * ***** ******* to *.*. ******** *** ********* ***** the ***** ** ********** ******** **** them.

***********, *** ** ********** *** ******* largely ******** *** ******* ** ************ against *** *****-****** *********. *** ********, Megvii *** **** ********** ********** ** *** ******** ********** and ** *** ******** **********'* ****** List. **** ******* ***** ***** ** government ************;******** ***** ** ** *** ****** ********* ******* ** *** **** ban, ***** ***** ****** ** ****.

** ****, **** **** ** *** comes ****** ** * **** ********, given ******** ************, ****** **** * new *** ** *********** ******* ***** companies. ***** ** ****** * **** that *** *** **** **** *********** action; *** ** ******* ********* *******, saying **** *** ********* * "**************" act ************, ** ******* ***********, "** abuse ** ***** *****." *******, *********** would ****** ******* ** *** ********* or ************* ** ** ********, ***** have ****** **** ******, *** ******** to ******* * ** ********, *** carry * *** *********** ** ******* bilateral **********.

Specific ******** **** *** *********

*** *** **** *** ******* *** reasoning ** ******** *** *********** ******** as "******* ******** *********." *** ************** Section ***** ******** ***** ********** ** justified *** **** ***** *** ********** companies, ***** ********* *********** ** *****'* 'military-civil ******' ******, ***** ***** **** create **** ******** **** *** ********** for ********* *** **** ******** ************.

********* ********* ** * "******* ******** *******"** ****. *** ******** **** *********** ** **** ************* ***** ****-****** evidence******* **** ********* *** ****** ** a "**** *" ******** (*** ******* level) ** *** ***, ************ ******* military ********, ********* ****-***** **** ****** on ******** *** ********** ** *** PLA ****** *****, ********* * ***** examining *** *** ********** ***** ******* "lethality" ** *** *******-**-*** ********, *** sponsored * ******** **********.

Comments