D-Link vs. Dropcam Shootout

Author: Derek Ward, Published on Jan 29, 2014

D-Link is not happy.

Over the last two years, upstart Dropcam has received a ton of coverage from dozens of publications, including IPVM (see our 2 Dropcam tests - original camera and new 'Pro' camera). 

Meanwhile D-Link, who reports selling far more IP cameras than Dropcam to consumers, is ignored. Worse, D-Link emphasizes that they offer recording for free via on-board SD card while Dropcam requires paying $100+ per year.

So, who is better for home use? The incumbent D-Link or the upstart Dropcam?

In this report, we decide, doing a test of D-Link's 720p DCS-2132L and contrasting that to Dropcam. Beyond the normal video and bandwidth analysis, we focus on two key areas of importance for consumers:

  • Which is easier for non technical people to setup? By how much and why?
  • Which is better for non technical people to access, search and download recorded video?

*-**** ** *** *****.

**** *** **** *** *****, ******* ******* *** ******** * ton ** ******** **** ****** ** ************, ********* **** (*** our * ******* ***** -******** ************ '***' ******). 

********* *-****, *** ******* ******* *** **** ** ******* **** Dropcam ** *********, ** *******. *****, *-**** ********** **** **** offer************ **** *** **-***** ** **** ***** ******* ******** ****** $100+ *** ****.

**, *** ** ****** *** **** ***? *** ********* *-**** or *** ******* *******?

** **** ******, ** ******, ***** * **** ** *-****'* 720p***-***** *** *********** **** ** *******. ****** *** ****** ***** *** bandwidth ********, ** ***** ** *** *** ***** ** ********** for *********:

  • ***** ** ****** *** *** ********* ****** ** *****? ** how **** *** ***?
  • ***** ** ****** *** *** ********* ****** ** ******, ****** and ******** ******** *****?

[***************]

Competitive ********

****'* *** *-**** ****** ** ******* *** ******************* ***** ********* *******:

  • *****: ***** *** ********** **** ******* **** *******, ********* ***** ** first ***** ********** ******* **** ** ******** ********, ******* *** ****** ** ***** router ****** ******* *** ** ** ***** ** ******** *****, and ****** ** ************ ******. ******* ******** *** **** **** to **** *** ****** **** ***** ******** *** ***, ***** launches *** ****** *** ***** ******* *** ***** *******.
  • **** *****: ******* **** ***** **** *-**** ******* ** ******, **** ****** latency. ** ******* ******* *** ******** *** ****** *********.
  • ******** *****:******** ***** ** ******* ** **** *** ********. ******* ***** requires ******* ******* ** ** *********, *** ***** *** ***** not ****** ***************. ***** ** ** ******** **** **** ** Dropcam ****. ***** ****** ** ********** **** *******************, *** **** ** ********** ******** **** *** ******'* *** interface, ***** * ******** ***** *** **** *********.
  • ***** *********:*-**** ****** ******** ***** ********** ****** ** ******** **** *******, including*****,*******,*****, ******************. ******* ****** **** * ****** **** ******, **** ** outdoor ******.
  • *****: *** *-**** ***-***** ***** *** ~$*** ******, ******** **** ********* **** *******, **** ** ********* *******. ******* cameras **** *** ~$***-$*** *** ******, ********* ********* (********/***), **** ********* ******* ** $*.** ** $**.** *** cloud ********* *****. ******* ******* *******, **** **** ***** ** available.

Other *** ******

**** *** ***** *** ******** **** **** ****:

  • ****** ***** ** ****: *** ***-***** *** * ********** ****** **.*° ********** ***** ** view ******** ** *** ********* **** ***° ** *** ********.
  • **** ***** ****:****** **** ******* ******** *** *** **** ****** (*** ******* to *******), *** ***-***** ******** * **' ***** *****, ******** it ** ** ****** ** *** ** *** *** *****. However, *** ******** ******** ***** ** **** *' ****, ** users ****** ****** ** ******** ****** ****** ** *** ****** must ** *********, ** **** ********.
  • **** ** ************:** ***** **** *-****'* ********* ** *****, **, *** ***** to ********, ****** ****. ************ *** ****** ** ~*-**', **** subject ******* **** ****** ** **** ***. **** ***** *** be ********** *** **** *** ** ***** *****, *** ** likely *** ***** ** ** ** **** *** ** **** small ******** ********.
  • ** ******* ********:***** ******* ** ****** ******* ** * ** **** *** ***** to **** ** *** *** **********, ** *** * ***** card, ** *** ** *** ******** **** *** ******. ***** will **** **** ** ****** *** **** ***** ** ****** recordings, ***** *** ** **** ** *** ** **** ***** in *** ******** ***** *** **** *** *** *********.
  • ** **** ********* ******** *** *********:***** ******* ******** *** ********** *********, ***** ***** *** ** about * ******* *** ****** *** ** **** **** **** limits. *-**** **** **** ****** ** ****** **** ** * future ******, *** *** *** ** *** ** ******* ** reducing ********* *** ********** ***********. *-**** ** ******* ** *** suffer **** **** **********, *** ** ******* ********.
  • *************: ********* *********** ** *** *-**** ***** *** *** ****** than *********** **** ** *******, ** ** ** **** **** most. **** ***** ** ******* ***** ** ********* ** * limited ** ****.

***************

******* ** * *** ****** *** *** *** ********* ******** than *-****. *** **** ***** ********* *** *-**** ** *** offering ** ******** **** *******.

** *** *** ************ ********* ** * ****** ** ****** member (*** ** *** **** ** ** ******* ** ** hours ** **** ********* *******), ******* ** ******* *** *** to **.

** *-**** ******** ********* ********** (**** ******** **** * ***-*********, ready ** ** ** ****, ******** ****** **, ********** ***********), it ***** ****** * **** ********** *********** ** *******.

*********/*************

** **** ********** ** ****** *** ** **************** *** ******* *** *************:

**** ***** ***** *** ********** ** ***** *** ***-*****'* ** card *************:

Physical ********

** **** * **** ** *** ******** ************ ** *** DCS-2132L ** **** ***** *****:

Image *******

** ******** *** *-**** ***-***** ** *** **** *** ************ **-********* ******* ***** ******* ******* ******* ***** **** **** *******.

** *** *** ******* ***** ******* ** ******* ** *** vast ********** ** *** (*-**** ******, ******* ****) ***** *********** difficult ** ** **********. 

** **** *****, *** ***-***** ** ********** ***********, ******* *** the ***** ****** **** * *** *****.

** *** *****, *** ***-***** ** **** ******* **** *** UBX1301 *** ** *** **** ****** **************, ****** ** ********* ** ******* ******* ** *** ******* and *****. 

*******, ** ****** *** *-****'* ** ***** ** ******* ********* from ~*-** ****. **** *** ******* ** ***** ** ~**' (5m), ** *** ********* ** ******* *************** ** *** **** subject. ** **', *** ******* ** **** **********, *** ** cannot ******* * ****. ** ~*', ** *** ***** ** see *** **** *******'* **** **** ******* *** ** ****** IR *****. **** ***** ** *** ******, **** ***** *' away, *** ******* ** ******* ******* ******* ************.

*********

********* *** ***** **** ******** ** ***** ******* ****** **** the **** **********. 

*** *-**** ***-***** ******** ** ***, ** "***** *******" ** it ** ********* *******. ** **** *** *** ** *** ******* ** ***, using *.********, *** *** ********* ******* ** *** ********** **** *****.

*********, ** **** *****, ***** **** *** ******** ** ***, faster **** *** ***, ***** ** *** *****, ** ******* to ** ***. *-***** ******** ** ~** ** **** **** light *** ********.

**** **** ***** ********** ******* (**** *** ****) *** ****** by ******* *** *** *******.

Test **** *********

**** **** * ******** *-**** ** ******* **** ** **** **** *** *** *** *** ****** ** **** test.

Comments (11)

While it's good that D-Link has free cloud live video access, the rudimentary SD card video playback is a real problem. It's unfortunately fairly common with IP camera manufacturers, who think they can check off SD card support with minimal access and poor usability.

With Dropcam, there are no definable 'motion detection zones', so it detects and records motion in the whole FoV.

Over time, Dropcam 'learns' the different types of routine motion and categorizes them (eg: cars passing by the window are 'orange events'), but it still would be better if a user could just mask off that area and avoid recording it/alarming on it altogether.

Motion masking appears to be available in the D-Link?

Dropcam "learning" motion doesn't work too well though. So far over the last two months it has assigned my cat five or six colors. Masking off an area would be ideal.

I have to also say that since I have gotten my Dropcam Pro I have suggested it as the best, quickest, easiest system I have ever laid eyes on to roughly a thousand people.

I thought you are comparing D-link with Dropcam in this article. How are the performance of low light sensitivity and bandwidth performance of Dropcam camera? How about the laterncy on live view and playing back the recorded video on Dropcam comparing to D-link?

Spencer, they both have integrated IR so low light performance is fairly similar. The big tradeoff, just like the day, is the difference in the width of the FoV. That said, IR range is limited on both.

With Dropcam, bandwidth cannot be controlled by the user at all. It's roughly 200kb/s 720p / 15fps, typically at a relatively high compression.

As for latency, Dropcam for live video can be fairly significant (3 - 5 seconds is common). Recorded video recall is quite quick (you can try it for yourself on their demo cameras). Obviously, with D-Link, the big limit on playback is finding and selecting each clip.

Would be really interested in seeing an independent showdown of Dropcam versus HomeMonitor - the cloud camera from Y-cam - what do you think?

Qaed, you really should disclose that you are from Y-Cam, no?

We've been tracking HomeMonitor but no immediate plans for a post.

Only 5 reviews on Amazon for HomeMonitor versus 364 for Dropcam. Looks like Homemonitor has some nice features (motion activated, motion zones) that Dropcam lacks.

I would be interested in seeing this test, but only because I have already given Dropcam as the solution for some of the executives here. They have all loved Dropcam thus far, but if HomeMonitor is a better solution I would like to know.

I am guessing all the integrators do not like either of these too much though?

Hey John, sorry, should have disclosed that in my post, I didn't realise that was needed if this was unticked - http://take.ms/7iHCk

I am still very much interested in an independent showdown though, especially as your tests are very thorough

Many thanks

Disregard

Hi All,

I'm a securtiy pro (UK) needing some home protection for a building project. Residential video surveillance is new to me! High pressure stuff when the wife wants protecting!

I would be v interested in Dropcam but interestingly no CVR support anywhere outside of North America - you need a North American CC.

That makes HomeMonitor from YCam interesting. Especially the free cloud storage.

I would say that DropCam have a great position for North America but they must be exposed to international competition if they fail to make their full feature set available outside of the USA.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camera Course Winter 2019 - Last Chance on Jan 24, 2019
Today, Thursday Jan 24th is the last chance to register for the Winter 2019 Camera Course. This is the only independent surveillance camera...
Testing Bandwidth vs. Frame Rate on Jan 23, 2019
Selecting frame rate has a major impact on surveillance bandwidth and storage consumption. But with smart codecs now common and cameras more...
Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Bad: Dahua Villa Video Doorbell Tested on Jan 11, 2019
Doorbells are one of the hottest segments in the residential market but Dahua's Villa Video Doorbell is the worst we have tested.   We bought and...
Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
Managed Video Services UL 827B Examined on Jan 09, 2019
Historically, UL listings for central stations have been important, with UL 827 having widespread support. However, few central stations have...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Testing Bandwidth vs. Frame Rate on Jan 23, 2019
Selecting frame rate has a major impact on surveillance bandwidth and storage consumption. But with smart codecs now common and cameras more...
Camera Course January 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
Bosch Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
Bosch's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing strong net...
Intersec 2019 Show Report on Jan 23, 2019
The 2019 Intersec show, held annually in Dubai, is now complete. IPVM attended for 3 days, interviewing numerous Chinese and Western video...
2019 Camera Book Released on Jan 22, 2019
This is the best, most comprehensive security camera training in the world, based on our unprecedented testing. Now, all IPVM PRO Members can get...
Milesight Company Profile on Jan 22, 2019
Milesight Technology, a Chinese company building an International branded business, says they are slowly building their presence through a series...
Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have become core features of video surveillance systems, as virtually all professional IP cameras integrate with...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact