60% Lower Bandwidth, 'Video Anywhere' - Digital Barriers TVI / EdgeVis

By: Brian Karas, Published on Oct 28, 2016

Streaming video over low bandwidth, wireless connections often results in stalled video, broken up video or significant video delays.

But Digital Barriers says their TVI CODEC (not to be confused with the HD Analog format), which is being re-branded as EdgeVis, can dynamically adapt to changing network conditions to deliver video where other CODECs fail.

In a conversation with Digital Barriers, we examined specific details on this CODEC, how it works, and what the limitations are. Our findings are inside this report.

********* ***** **** *** bandwidth, ******** *********** ***** results ** ******* *****, broken ** ***** ** significant ***** ******.

*** ******* ******** **** ***** *** ***** (not ** ** ******** with *** ** ****** ******), which ** ***** **-******* as*******, *** *********** ***** to ******** ******* ********** to ******* ***** ***** other ****** ****.

** * ************ **** Digital ********, ** ******** ******** details ** **** *****, how ** *****, *** what *** *********** ***. Our ******** *** ****** this ******.

[***************]

Claimed ******** ** ***

******* ******** **** *** has *** ******* ******** over *.***/*.***:

  • ******* ** **** ***** to ******** ******* ********** without *********** ** *******
  • ***-**-*** ****** **********

*** ******* ************ *** for ******** ******** (*** Wifi, **/***, *********, ***.) where ********* **** **** reliability *** ********.

******** **********/*********

*** ****** ** ********* restrictions ** *********** ******** resolution ***/** ********* ** the ***** ****** ** accommodate ********* *********. **** is ****** ** ********* process, *** ***** *** set **** **********, **** as * ******* ********* or **********, ****** **** may ******* **** ***** from ********* ** ******* circumstances. ** **** *** ****** Digital ********' *** ********, and ****** ******* ** how **** ** ***** relative ** ***** ******.

** ** ******* ** * VMS **** ******* ********** of * ***** ****** to *********** *** ************ of * ****** ******, dynamically *********** *** ****** with ********* **********.

Encoder/Cloud-Based ************

*** ** *********** *** one ** ******* ********' encoders [**** ** ****** available], ***** **** ******* local *******. * ***** architecture ** ***** *****:

*** ****** ******* ** the *******, ******** ***** H.264, ** *** **********/********* *******, up ** * ******* of *****/**. *** ******* records **** ******, *** also **-******* ** ** TVI, **** ********** *** framerate ********** ** ********** by *** ************ **** the ******* ** *** remote ******.

*** ******* ** ******* Digital ********' ***** *******, or ******* ********* ****** servers ** ***** **** to **** ***** ***** internal, ***** ****** **** authentication *** ********* *** need *** ****-********** ** the **** ***** *** encoder ** *********. ********* ** Digital ********, ***** ***** imposed ** *** ********/******** is <. class="dont-blokk">additional ***** *** ** incurred ** *** *******. No ********** ** ***** to ******** * ** latency ** * ********* uplink *** ********.

******* *** ** ******** to ******* ***** ** remote ********* **** ******** links, ** *** ** thought ** ** * WAN-oriented *****, ***** **** video ****** *** *** oriented, *** ****** ********** stable ********.

Single ****** ******* ******* ******

*** ******* ***** * single ****** ******* *** cloud ** *** ********* clients. ******* ** ****, the ****** ** ******* down ** ******** *** client **** *** ***** connection *** ******, ********* other ******* **** ****** connectivity. ** *** ********** is ******* *** ******* and *** *****, **** of ****** ****** ************ restrictions ** *** ****** the ******.

******* ******** **** **** stream ******* ****** ** implemented ** *** *** of **** ** ******* this **********.

Stream **********

*** ******* *** ********* encrypted *** ** ***, with ****** *** **********. Because **** ** ******* by *** *******, ** can ** ***** ** any ****** **** **** the ******, *** ****** itself **** *** **** to ** ********.

Vs. ***** ******

***** ****** **** ****** bandwidth, *** *** ** valuable **** ******* ***** over **** *** ***********, but **** ***** ***** settings ***** ** ***** motion, *** ******* *******. In ** **** ***** Zipstream (*** *******), *** TVI *** ******* ******* results **** * ********** congested ******** ****, *** if *** ***** ******* active, ********* ** ***** to ******* ** **** more ****, ******* ** the ******* **********. ***, in **** ********, ***** adapt ** ******** ********** or *********, ** ***** to **** *** ***** bitrate ** *** ****** low ****** ** *********** the *******.

Target *********

******* ********' ******* ***** of *** ********** *** municipal/government *************, ******* ********, and ******** ************** *********. These ***** *** ******** have ******** ******* ******** at ****** *********, ***** with ***** ** ******** locations, *** * ******* for ********/********* *****.

VMS ************

******* ******** ******** * simplistic ****** *** **** viewing ** ********* ******** video, *** **** **** support *** ************. ********* [link ** ****** *********] and******* *** *** *** ******* integrations **-****, ** ***** are *** **** ******** used ***** ** ***** customers.

ONVIF ******

*** ***** ***** ******* Barriers *** * ******** bridge ***** *** **** a ****** **** *** central ****** *** ********* it ** ** *.*** stream **** * *** can ******* ** *** ONVIF. **** ****** ***** not ***** ****** ** video ****** ** *** encoder, *** **** ***** a ****** ** ** sent **** **** *****.

*******

******** ***** **** ~$*,*** - $*,*** ****, ********* on ************* *** ********. There ** ** ******* charge *** *** ***** component, ** ** * single-transaction ****.

TVI/EdgeVis ***********

*** *****/** ********** ** the ******** **** ***** TVI's ************* ** **** new *************, ***** ***+ resolutions *** ******** **** common. ************, *** *********** nature ** *** ***** will ******** *** *******, or *** ********** ********** to ********* *** ***** ******. Given *** ***** ** a *** *******, *** the ****** ****** **********, in **** ***** ***** could *** ******* ******* from * $*** ***, with ********* ** ******** mobile ****** ******** ******* down ** * **** low *******, ** * fraction ** *** **** if **** *** *** concerned ***** ********** ** the ***** *******.

Comments (17)

I have seen a live demonstration of this ...and it is brilliant.

Can you elaborate? Was it a demo of a live system, or a technology demo? What were the parameters of the link?

It was a live demo at IFSEC this year. They had two live links to cameras - x1 in Glasgow, Scotland, the other somewhere in States - and it really had a 'Wow' factor.

You would have a really pixelated picture and then once an area was identified to zoom in on, an area of interest (a face, a license plate, a sign) the clarity of picture that could be provided was like nothing else I've ever seen to this point.

"You would have a really pixelated picture and then once an area was identified to zoom in on, an area of interest (a face, a license plate, a sign) the clarity of picture that could be provided was like nothing else I've ever seen to this point."

? I'm not sure how that example fits...

What was being demo'd? Bandwidth and latency or optical zoom and resolution of the camera they were using?

Avigilon's HDSM?

"Pricing

Encoders range from ~$1,000 - $4,000 MSRP, depending on configuration and features. There is no monthly charge for the cloud component, it is a single-transaction sale."

How is that scalable/sustainable? How can fixed front-end costs sustain a perpetually increasing back-end infrastructure?

That is a good question, they did mention that a lot of customers run their own cloud server component, so it is not a 1:1 ratio of encoder sales to demand increase on their infrastructure.

Also, the cloud component is not recording video, it's just routing connections and doing some basic user auth, from my understanding. Thus, it would be easier to scale than something that offered 64GB of cloud storage with every encoder for example.

I have the SD-600 and IP250 and they work well with TVI Server (I built my own in Windows 7).

The technology works well and is gaining traction in the Law Enforcement and Governement markets. I love the fact that it can save the native 1920x1080 resolution locally so you have the full resolution for extraction.

This actually isn't anything new. MOBOTIX has been doing this for some time now, in fact almost 2 years now. Its called adaptive bandwidth utilization engine, which happens to run in every single MOBOTIX camera. The only difference here, from what has been explained is that ours is policy driven and not automatic. Meaning a user or policy can dictate the streaming mode per device or on demand. This works with our PC application and iOS app. What happens to be different is that MOBOTIX has the ability to do High Res, Low res or Audio only. Another difference would be VMS support. At the moment it is only supported via our own VMS.

For example a 1280x960 stream is ~1.1Mbps give or take "High Res" live stream, simply push a soft button and take the 1MP down to VGA or CIF with 240kbps stream on demand. Zoom into a defined area and the resolution will upscale for the defined area and the bitrate will lower to ~80-100kbps as the zoomed in area is all that is streamed from the camera at that given time. Want Audio only, select it, and then you have a 16kbps stream only audio.

Meanwhile the cameras are still recording High resolution to storage for evidence purposes. 3MP, 5MP, 6MP up to 12MP.

Test was conducted from my home using the MOBOTIX D15-180 camera, 1Gbps upload speed home network, received on my LTE connected iPhone using the MOBOTIX app and the network speed test that is built into the app for factual data.

Is this what the whole company is about?

Dynamic flow control and scalable coding is great, but this seems like it should just be built-in in to the VMS or at least thru a resident plug-in architecture.

[Note: Poster is from Bosch]

Bosch's transcoding does this since years, either in a separate hardware transcoder or integrated in a storage device.

IndigoVision

Anyone know whether there's an option to embed the metadata (bounding boxes) in the video stream?

Gareth - what bounding boxes are you referring to?

The boxes drawn around people/objects detected by the video analytics. Avigilon has an option to embedd these into the video to make viewing through 3rd party VMS easy. Bosch, on the other hand, sends the analytic metadata as a separate stream to the video without any option to embed or 'burn-in' the metadata.

Just wondering whether Digital Barriers' video analytics allow you to embed these bounding boxes (or whether this is an option when running Digital Barriers on Axis cameras)?

The Digital Barriers product covered in this report does not have any analytics, it is an encoding/compression scheme.

I think you might be asking about their SmartVis analytics? I have not looked at that product, so not sure what options are available for embedded object detection boxes.

Hello Brian,

I am SmartVis SafeZone Product & R&D Manager. SafeZone runs embedded in all the ACAP-enabled Axis cameras/encoders or on a server. In both cases, we output metadata (i.e. intrusion alarms and detection boxes, differentiating humans from vehicles) as an open XML stream. We have software bridges/plugins with Milestone and Genetec allowing to display the detection boxes on the live and recorded videos in the VMS as well as trigger events when detection occurs. We also have a deep integration with Seetec where there is no need for a third software to be installed: The detection boxes and alarms are directly understood and saved by Cayuga for both edge-based and server version.

We boast a simple automatic calibration method and are extremely-resistant to disturbances due to foliage movement (even very rough), shadows and lighting changes. We have iLids Primary accreditation and have won the award for IFSEC bext Intrusion detection system of the year in 2015.

For any information, do not hesitate to contact me. :) I am not sales or marketing but just really proud about what we have achieved with this product out of hard work over the past 11 years in Nice (France).

Best regards,

Marie-Claude (one of the few women in the field)

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,366 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
Surveillance Codec Guide on Jan 03, 2019
Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may...
ONVIF Profile T Examined on Dec 21, 2018
Despite ONVIF's overall success (11,000+ devices supported), ONVIF has been criticized for its limitations and problems, including VMD and video...
Video Analytics Integration Guide on Aug 16, 2018
Video analytics is hot again (at least conceptually) but integrating video analytics with VMSes can be challenging. This is especially significant...
Smart Codec Guide on Feb 01, 2018
"Smart Codec" was once seemingly a marketing buzzword, but in 2020, nearly all new camera models include this tehcnology. These marketing names...
Multicasting Surveillance Tutorial on Jan 04, 2018
Network bandwidth can be a concern for some surveillance systems. While improvements in video codecs, such as smart codecs for H.264 and H.265,...
CBR vs VBR vs MBR - Surveillance Streaming on Nov 21, 2017
How you stream video has a major impact on quality and bandwidth. And it is not simply CODEC choice (e.g., H.264 vs H.265). Regardless of the...
Smart Codec Usage Surges - 2017 Statistics on Oct 25, 2017
Smart codec usage has surged in 2017, new IPVM statistics show. Smart codecs are less than three years old, starting in 2015 with Axis. Now, smart...
Exacq M Series Low Cost NVR Tested on Oct 12, 2017
With recent cyber security issues hitting NVRs and cameras from low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision, users are increasingly seeking alternatives...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...