Deep Science - Active Threat Cloud Monitoring Startup

By Brian Karas, Published Apr 03, 2017, 05:49am EDT

Deep learning for $2 a day for a system that automatically detects guns and masks, alerting the police to robberies and threats?

A US startup is launching such a service, based on the work of its founder/CEO, Dr. Sean Huver [link no longer available], and previous work from projects he worked on for DARPA and the DoD. 

In this report, we share feedback from Huver and analyze the cloud-based threat detection service that his company is set to release.

Deep ******* ********

**** *******, *** ******* ******* by **. *****, *** born *** ** **** he *** ** * market ****** **** *** not ***** *** ** current ***** ******** *********. Unlike **** ***** ********* companies, ***** **** ******* to ******** ******, *** rely ** ******* ******** or ******** ********* *** monitoring, **** ******* ** also ******** *** *** monitoring ******** ** ******* and ******* ** ******.

*** ********** *** ********* to ****** ********* ********* in *********** ****** *** ******* businesses, ** **** ** after-hours ********* **** ***** into *** *****.

*** ********* ***** ***** an ******** ** ****** detection ****** **** **** Science's *********:

 

Management / *******

********* **. ***** ** the ******* ********, ***** the ******** ** *** R&D/development, ******* ****** *** President *** ****** ***, **** Snyder [**** ** ****** available], ** ****** ** an ******* ** *** company.

*** ******* ** ********* funded, *** **** **** have ****** **** ****** from *** ** *****, preferring ** ****** *********** for ***, ****** **** not ***** *** ****** funding ** *** ******.

Threat ********* ********

********* ** *** ***, his ********** ********* **** for * ****** ********** to ******* ***** ******** by ****** ****** ******** through ****, *****, ********, or ******* *******. *** system *** **** ****** a ****** ******* * weapon. ** ***** *** a ****** ** ********** frames ***** *** ** both ** ***** ******** are ***, ***** ***** an ***** ***** ** sent ** **** *******'* office, ***** ********* ***** review *** ***** *** take *********** ******. 

*** ********* ***** ** threats *** ********* ********:

  • ********* ******* / ****** concealing ******** ** ******* a ******
  • *****-***** *********
  • ***** ****** *** **** monitored

Range/Resolution ************

*** ****** ******** ******* 40x40 ****** ** * person's ****, ** ** a ******, ** *** accurate **********. **** ******* to ************* **-** ***, which *** **** **** limitations *** ****** **** have ***** ********** ******* in *****, ** *** covering **** ***** **** a ****** ****** (** a ***** ** *********, with ***** ************, ** ** camera ***** **** ***** ~13' ****, * ***** camera ** ** ~**'). 

Cloud ******** - ******** *********, **** **********

* **** ***** **** from ******* ** **** to **** *******'* ***** servers, ***** *** ***** analytics *** *********. *** company **** ** *** work **** **** *******/**** streams, ******* *** ********** requirements *** ****** ** larger ******** ********* *******, particularly ** ******** ******* are ***** ********* **************.

**** *******'* *** ** ************ ***** ****-********** be **** ** ****** remote ****** ** *** cameras. ***** **** ********** the **** *** ********** on-site ********, ** *** make *** ******* **** susceptible ** ***** ******* or ******** ****** ******.

Live **********

** ***** ***** *** employees *** **********, **** Science ****** **** *** better ******** ****** *********, as **** ** ****** any ***** ***** ****** to **** ********** ******** data **** *** ****** to ****** ****** ***** alarms. ********* ***** *** no ******* *** ********* to ****-******* ***** ******* directly, *** *** ******* does **** ** ***** this ********** ** *** future.

********, ********, *** ********* a ********** ******** ** a ******* *********, ***** is *** **** ******** and ***** ********* ** this ***** ****** ** outsource **** ******** ** dedicated **********. *******, ***** operators ******** *** *********** *** **** ***** ******** staff *** ********** ******* and ********** ** ******* events, ** ** *********** (****** *********** *** *** be *** **** ******* to **** ******** ****** from). *****, ***** ********** is ***** ********* *********** among ******, *** ******* potential ********* ** ** event ** **********, ****** the **** ********** ******* potentially * **** ** distraction, ****** **** * benefit.

Open **** **** 

********* *** ******* ** available ** * **** phase, **** ** ***** *** ~40 ******* ***** *********. This **** ***** ** being ****** ** ** a ***** ********, ***** participants *** *** *** cloud ********* *** **********, however *** ********** ****** is **** ******* **** noon ** ********, ***. 

Pricing *** ****** ****

******* ** **** *******'* site ** ****** ** *** users, ****** *** ******* says **** **** ** ******** dealer ******** ** ****. Depending ** ****** ** cameras *** **** *******, prices ***** **** $**-$** per ****** *** *****, or **** **** $*/*** in **** *****. *** prices ******* *** ***** analytics ** **** ** 24/7 **** ***** ********** of ******** ******. ***** are ** ****** ** number ** ****** *** month.

**** ************ ** *** service ** ********* ********* for **** ****.

Comments (3)

This is an interesting approach. Detecting specific articles like masks and weapons obviates the need for a nice high frame rate, which is not practical. I would expect Dr. Huver has done an actuarial analysis that ends up justifying the cost per camera. Another cost is that of false alarms. Where I live, if the cops have to roll up to repeated false alarms then they start billing the originator. 

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Depending on the approach the detection it is likely to get better over time. There maybe false positives to begin with, but especially with active monitoring, those should get factored down fairly quickly. 

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Another cost is that of false alarms.

True, but they are attempting to address that by manning their own monitoring operation, so police should only be called when there are actual events, not just someone in the winter time wearing a face mask.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,887 reports, 921 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports