Testing Day vs Night With IR

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Dec 09, 2014

IR illumination helps.

When it gets dark, especially real dark, with no nearby artifical lighting, pretty much every surveillance camera (even 'super' ones) are going to deliver significantly degraded images (see: Super Low Light vs Integrated IR Shootout).

Because of that, IR use in surveillance is growing robustly and for good reason.

However, how good is IR?

Specifically, we wanted to know:

  • How does a scene with IR illumination at night compare to the same scene during the day? Would IR illumination deliver the exact same details (save color) as the camera during the day? Or would it be degraded and, if so, by how much?
  • What benefit does increased resolution have using IR? How much better (or not) is 5MP vs 3MP vs 1MP vs VGA etc, when using IR?

** ************ *****.

**** ** **** ****, especially **** ****, **** no ****** ********* ********, ****** much ***** ************ ****** (**** 'super' ****) *** ***** to ******* ************* ******** images (***: ***** *** ***** ** Integrated ** ********).

******* ** ****, ** use ** ************ ********* *********** *** **** ******.

*******, *** **** ** IR?

************, ** ****** ** know:

  • *** **** * ***** with ** ************ ** night ******* ** *** same ***** ****** *** day? ***** ** ************ deliver *** ***** **** details (**** *****) ** the ****** ****** *** day? ** ***** ** be ******** ***, ** so, ** *** ****?
  • **** ******* **** ********* resolution **** ***** **? How **** ****** (** not) ** *** ** 3MP ** *** ** VGA ***, **** ***** IR?

** ****** **** **** a ******* ** ******* to ****** ***** *********.

[***************]

Key *******

******* **** ** ** night ***** ** ******* day **** *** *** IR ***** *****. ** at ***** ***** ******* *** consistently ***** **** *** time *****, **** **** ideal ** ************ **********. However, ** *** ***** significantly ****** **** ***-** dark ******.

**** ********** **** *** typically ******* ** **** benefits **** ** ** as ** **** ****** the ***.

*********** ********** ** ***: Even **** **, ** not ****** ** *** the **** ******* ** night **** *** ** during *** ***. ** particular, ** *** ************** *** / ***** density, ****** **** **.

********, ** ***** / dark ****** *** *********, this *** ** * reason ** ** *** lower ********** ******* (*** to ***** ** *****) or ** *** ** you *** *** * lower ********** ** ***** (either ******* ********** ********** ** * schedule).

Image ********

**** ** *** ******* of * *** ******, where ** ****** ****** on / ****** *** from *** **** *** max **** ** ***.

*** ***** ******* ** that *** *** ***** is ****** ******* ****** than *** ***** *****, despite ** ***** **.

**** ** * *** camera **** *** **** test ******* *******:

**** *** *****, * notable ******* ******* ******* day *** *****.

***, **** ** * overall ******** ******* ***, night **** ** ** and ***** **** ** off:

** **** ********** *****, we **** * '*****' low ***** ****** ** 0.1 *** ('****** ***' scenario). *********, *** **** a *** ** ****** will ** ******* **** on *** ******** ***** level (***** ***** ** 3 *** ** **** scene ******* ** *.* lux) *** *** *********** of **** ****** (***** you **** * **** low ***** ****** ** a **** * ****** lens). *******, **** **** reprsent * ****** ******* of ** ** ***** being ****** **** ***** without **, *** ***** worse **** *** **** image.

Other ** *******

***** ******** **** ** in * '**** ****' / ******** **** ********, where *** ** ** within ***** *** ** even.

******* ***** ** ***** if:

  • ******* *** ****** *** range ** **** *** IR *********** *** *****. Recall **** ************ ***** falls *** **** (******* ****** ****), ** ** *** amount ** ** ******** the ****** *****, *** image **** ****** ****** to **** ** * non ** ******.
  • ******* *** *** ***** to *** ****** / IR ******. **** ********** IR ******* *** ****** this ** ********* *** automatically ********** ***** *** not *** (*** ** external ** ***********) ** there ** * **** of ************.
  • ** ******** ***** ** not ******* ** **** camera ***. ** *** IR ********* ** ******** than *** ***, ******* captured ** *** ****** can ***** ** ****.

*** ** **** ****** be ******** ** **** using ** ** ********** whether ** *** *********** lighting.

Test *********

********** ****** ** **** report **** * ****** camera ** * ****, at ******* ***********, **** field ** **** *** other ******** ********* ****** throughout *** ****. **** method ********* ********* ****** **** camera ****** ** ******** FOV *** ***** ******. Additionally, *********** ********* ******* different *************' ******* *** to ********** **** ** sensor, ***, ***. *** removed.

******* **** ****** ******* in * ~**' ********** field ** **** ** order ** **** *** relatively **** (~** ** 1080p/~50 ** ****) *** fine *********** **********. *** findings ** **** **** also ***** **** ************ from **** *****, *** comparisons ** *** ******** ** *****'* *** ***** ** bullet.

*******, ******* **** ****** using ******* ********, **** exposure ************ ** */*** and ************ *** ** ~28. ***** ********* *************' cameras **** **** ** testing. ***** ****** **** about *** *** ** full ***** *** ~*.** lux **** ****** *** and ** **.

Comments (3)

Ethan and IPVM, great job as always. It may be of interest that due to the spectral bands being different from VIS to Near IR, the spatial resolution of the image formed changes proportionately. So if the mean wavelength in the VIS is about 550 nm, and the mean for Near IR is about 1100 nm, then the Near IR image will have half the spatial resolution (since the aperture remains constant). But then also the depth of focus shifts with the longer wavelengths forcing the spot on the imager further back. These two factors conspire to make the Near IR images look relatively blurry.

Hi Skip, regarding focus shift due to IR light: for this test we refocused all cameras (aside from one, which was fixed focal length) after switching to night with IR on. I actually double checked focus in some cases after switching resolution just to make sure nothing had shifted.

The motorized zoom cameras we used all had auto-focus and could be set to refocus when switching from day to night, but I prefer doing it manually during testing. Sometimes the refocus doesn't go quite right and I want to be sure focus isn't an issue.

One thing that I found interesting while doing tests with IR bullet cameras is what happens to “colors” when switching on and off the IR. On one of the test boards we used a ColorChecker that we printed out at the office, and it gets interesting when you have a decent BW picture without using IR and then switch on the IR. Some of the “colors” completely disappear due to the fact that the IR light is not reflecting the colors from the printer and you get blank spots were you previously at least had something greyish.

Magic :-)

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Hikvision DeepinView Camera Analytics Tested on May 08, 2019
Hikvision is expanding its 'deep learning' offerings with a new camera series called 'DeepinView' claiming false alarm reduction and improved...
Dahua ePoE Long Distance UTP / Coax Tested on May 03, 2019
Dahua's Enhanced PoE (ePoE) line is claiming extended video and power transmission over 600m without repeaters, with devices interchangeable via...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...
Amazon Ring Public Subsidy Program Aims To Dominate Residential Security on May 20, 2019
Amazon dominates market after market. Quitely, but increasingly, they are doing so in residential security, through a combination of significant...
LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact