Testing Day vs Night With IR

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Dec 09, 2014

IR illumination helps.

When it gets dark, especially real dark, with no nearby artifical lighting, pretty much every surveillance camera (even 'super' ones) are going to deliver significantly degraded images (see: Super Low Light vs Integrated IR Shootout).

Because of that, IR use in surveillance is growing robustly and for good reason.

However, how good is IR?

Specifically, we wanted to know:

  • How does a scene with IR illumination at night compare to the same scene during the day? Would IR illumination deliver the exact same details (save color) as the camera during the day? Or would it be degraded and, if so, by how much?
  • What benefit does increased resolution have using IR? How much better (or not) is 5MP vs 3MP vs 1MP vs VGA etc, when using IR?

** ************ *****.

**** ** **** ****, especially **** ****, **** no ****** ********* ********, ****** much ***** ************ ****** (**** 'super' ****) *** ***** to ******* ************* ******** images (***: ***** *** ***** ** Integrated ** ********).

******* ** ****, ** use ** ************ ********* *********** *** **** ******.

*******, *** **** ** IR?

************, ** ****** ** know:

  • *** **** * ***** with ** ************ ** night ******* ** *** same ***** ****** *** day? ***** ** ************ deliver *** ***** **** details (**** *****) ** the ****** ****** *** day? ** ***** ** be ******** ***, ** so, ** *** ****?
  • **** ******* **** ********* resolution **** ***** **? How **** ****** (** not) ** *** ** 3MP ** *** ** VGA ***, **** ***** IR?

** ****** **** **** a ******* ** ******* to ****** ***** *********.

[***************]

Key *******

******* **** ** ** night ***** ** ******* day **** *** *** IR ***** *****. ** at ***** ***** ******* *** consistently ***** **** *** time *****, **** **** ideal ** ************ **********. However, ** *** ***** significantly ****** **** ***-** dark ******.

**** ********** **** *** typically ******* ** **** benefits **** ** ** as ** **** ****** the ***.

*********** ********** ** ***: Even **** **, ** not ****** ** *** the **** ******* ** night **** *** ** during *** ***. ** particular, ** *** ************** *** / ***** density, ****** **** **.

********, ** ***** / dark ****** *** *********, this *** ** * reason ** ** *** lower ********** ******* (*** to ***** ** *****) or ** *** ** you *** *** * lower ********** ** ***** (either ******* ********** ********** ** * schedule).

Image ********

**** ** *** ******* of * *** ******, where ** ****** ****** on / ****** *** from *** **** *** max **** ** ***.

*** ***** ******* ** that *** *** ***** is ****** ******* ****** than *** ***** *****, despite ** ***** **.

**** ** * *** camera **** *** **** test ******* *******:

**** *** *****, * notable ******* ******* ******* day *** *****.

***, **** ** * overall ******** ******* ***, night **** ** ** and ***** **** ** off:

** **** ********** *****, we **** * '*****' low ***** ****** ** 0.1 *** ('****** ***' scenario). *********, *** **** a *** ** ****** will ** ******* **** on *** ******** ***** level (***** ***** ** 3 *** ** **** scene ******* ** *.* lux) *** *** *********** of **** ****** (***** you **** * **** low ***** ****** ** a **** * ****** lens). *******, **** **** reprsent * ****** ******* of ** ** ***** being ****** **** ***** without **, *** ***** worse **** *** **** image.

Other ** *******

***** ******** **** ** in * '**** ****' / ******** **** ********, where *** ** ** within ***** *** ** even.

******* ***** ** ***** if:

  • ******* *** ****** *** range ** **** *** IR *********** *** *****. Recall **** ************ ***** falls *** **** (******* ****** ****), ** ** *** amount ** ** ******** the ****** *****, *** image **** ****** ****** to **** ** * non ** ******.
  • ******* *** *** ***** to *** ****** / IR ******. **** ********** IR ******* *** ****** this ** ********* *** automatically ********** ***** *** not *** (*** ** external ** ***********) ** there ** * **** of ************.
  • ** ******** ***** ** not ******* ** **** camera ***. ** *** IR ********* ** ******** than *** ***, ******* captured ** *** ****** can ***** ** ****.

*** ** **** ****** be ******** ** **** using ** ** ********** whether ** *** *********** lighting.

Test *********

********** ****** ** **** report **** * ****** camera ** * ****, at ******* ***********, **** field ** **** *** other ******** ********* ****** throughout *** ****. **** method ********* ********* ****** **** camera ****** ** ******** FOV *** ***** ******. Additionally, *********** ********* ******* different *************' ******* *** to ********** **** ** sensor, ***, ***. *** removed.

******* **** ****** ******* in * ~**' ********** field ** **** ** order ** **** *** relatively **** (~** ** 1080p/~50 ** ****) *** fine *********** **********. *** findings ** **** **** also ***** **** ************ from **** *****, *** comparisons ** *** ******** ** *****'* *** ***** ** bullet.

*******, ******* **** ****** using ******* ********, **** exposure ************ ** */*** and ************ *** ** ~28. ***** ********* *************' cameras **** **** ** testing. ***** ****** **** about *** *** ** full ***** *** ~*.** lux **** ****** *** and ** **.

Comments (3)

Ethan and IPVM, great job as always. It may be of interest that due to the spectral bands being different from VIS to Near IR, the spatial resolution of the image formed changes proportionately. So if the mean wavelength in the VIS is about 550 nm, and the mean for Near IR is about 1100 nm, then the Near IR image will have half the spatial resolution (since the aperture remains constant). But then also the depth of focus shifts with the longer wavelengths forcing the spot on the imager further back. These two factors conspire to make the Near IR images look relatively blurry.

Hi Skip, regarding focus shift due to IR light: for this test we refocused all cameras (aside from one, which was fixed focal length) after switching to night with IR on. I actually double checked focus in some cases after switching resolution just to make sure nothing had shifted.

The motorized zoom cameras we used all had auto-focus and could be set to refocus when switching from day to night, but I prefer doing it manually during testing. Sometimes the refocus doesn't go quite right and I want to be sure focus isn't an issue.

One thing that I found interesting while doing tests with IR bullet cameras is what happens to “colors” when switching on and off the IR. On one of the test boards we used a ColorChecker that we printed out at the office, and it gets interesting when you have a decent BW picture without using IR and then switch on the IR. Some of the “colors” completely disappear due to the fact that the IR light is not reflecting the colors from the printer and you get blank spots were you previously at least had something greyish.

Magic :-)

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,367 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Cheap Camera Problems at Night on Feb 19, 2020
Cheap cameras generally have problems at night, despite the common perception that integrated IR makes cameras mostly the same, according to new...
IR Surveillance Camera Guide on Feb 06, 2020
Integrated infrared (IR) cameras are everywhere in 2020, but not all IR is created equal, with many differences in coverage, overexposure,...
Integrated IR Camera Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 30, 2020
The best and worst cameras tested in this IPVM shootout showed major differences in quality and performance. While many view IR as being a...
Avigilon Appearance Search Tested on Oct 30, 2019
Avigilon Appearance Search claims that it "sorts through hours of video with ease, to quickly locate a specific person or vehicle of interest...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Oct 14, 2019
Camera focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can significantly reduce details, making cameras less effective. In this guide, we...
Lens Iris Tutorial on Aug 08, 2019
Cameras, like humans, have irises, controlling the light which hits the imager and impacting image details. However, cameras have multiple types of...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Hikvision ColorVu Integrated Visible Light Cameras Examined on Jun 22, 2018
UPDATE: Hikvision ColorVu Camera Tested When it comes to low light, infrared light has become the defacto standard in surveillance. But IR is...
Super Low Light Surveillance Guide on Aug 01, 2017
At the beginning of this decade, low light performance of megapixel cameras was generally terrible. This was the era of super slow shutter where...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hikvision Illicitly Uses Back To The Future In Marketing on Jul 03, 2020
NBCUniversal told IPVM that Hikvision UK's ongoing coronavirus marketing campaign using NBCUniversal's assets was not allowed. Hikvision mass...
Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...