Dahua 4K Micro 4/3 Camera Tested (IPC-HF8835F)

By: John Scanlan, Published on Apr 03, 2018

Dahua is going big.

Their new 4K HF8835F Micro Four Thirds sensor is one of the largest now on the market. Dahua is claming:

Starlight Technology and Ultra Wide Dynamic Range to produce crisp, clear images with minimal ambient light

How well will Dahua face in this segment against Axis' Q1659 or Sony's 35mm VB770? And how does it compare to 1/2" super low light models like Hanwa's ExtraLux or Hikvision Darkfighter?

We bought and tested the HF8835F to find out. Inside we report our findings on:

  • Dark (<0.1lx) monochrome image quality
  • Low light (<1lx) color image quality
  • Daytime image quality
  • WDR performance
  • Lens options
  • Physical features
  • VMS support
  • Bandwidth

***** ** ***** ***.

***** *** ************** **** ****** ****** is *** ** *** largest *** ** *** market. ***** ** *******:

********* ********** *** ***** Wide ******* ***** ** produce *****, ***** ****** with ******* ******* *****

*** **** **** ***** face ** **** ******* against****' ***********'* **** *****? *** *** **** it ******* ** */*" super *** ***** ****** like*****'* ******************* ***********?

** ****** *** ****** the ******* ** **** out. ****** ** ****** our ******** **:

  • **** (quality
  • *** ***** (image *******
  • ******* ***** *******
  • *** ***********
  • **** *******
  • ******** ********
  • *** *******
  • *********

[***************]

*******

*** ******* *** ******* key ********* ** *** testing:

  • ****** ***:*** ******* ******** *** best *** ******* ** cameras ******, **** ***** images ******* ****** ********* and ** ****** ***** of *** *****.
  • ****** **** ***** *******:**** ***** ******* ******* were ******, ***** ** the **** **** ***** and **** ****** **** Hanwha *** ********* ***** 1/2" ****** ******.
  • ****** *** ***** *******:** *** ***** ******, ~1-3lx, *** ******* ******** better ****** **** *** Axis *****, ****** ******** 6085, *** ********* **** due ** ******* ************. However, ***** ****** **** that ******* *** ***** poor ******** ** *** high *** ****** (~** PPF ** ~**' *****, effectively ******* ** ~** PPF). ************, ******* **** much ***** **** ****'* 35mm *****, ***** ******** usable ******* ******* *** more ******* **** **** the *******.

*******, ***** **** *** key *********:

  • **** **** ********* *******:** **** ****** (the ******* ******** **** rough ******* ** *** subject, ********** ** *********'* 1/2" ***** *********** (****) and **** ***** **** Hanwha's ******** **** *** Sony *****, **** ** which ******* ***** ******* detail. *** **** ***** produced ** ******* ** the ******* ** **** chart ** ***** ****** (with **-****/**.* ****).
  • **** *** **** ******/** third ***** ****** *********:***** ****** **** * single *.*** **** ***** with * **** **** 107° ***** ** **** and * **** **.**-****. ***** **** ******* states **** *** ****** does *** ******* ***** lenses, *** ** **** unable ** ***** * third ***** (*********/*****) ***** in *** *****. ** contrast, **** ****** ***** different **** ******* *** supported ***** ** ***** lenses ** *** *****.

*******

*** ***-******* ***** ***~$*,***-*,*** *** ********* *** ****** ****, with ** **********~$*** *** *****'* *.*** M43 ****. **** ** ******* less ********* **** ***** large ****** *******, **** as *** **** ***** (~$4,200-7,200 ********* ** ****) or **** ***-***** ($*,***, not ********* ****). *******, the ***** ******* ** ~$1,000 **** **** *****'******* ****/** *****(**** */*.*" ******).

*** *******'* ******* ** also ******* **** ********* than */*" ****** ****** here:

Physical ********

*** ******* ** ******* to ******* *** *******, with *** **** ******* difference ***** *** ****** Micro **** ****** **** mount. *** **** ****** and ******** *** ********* similar ** ******* ** mount *** *******, **** audio, ******, *******, *** microSD ******* ** *****, located ** *** **** of *** ******. ** review ***** ******** ** this ******** ********:

Closer ** **** ** ******* *** *******

*** ****** ** ********** larger **** ******* ** mount *** ****** ******, such ** *** ********* 6026 ***** *****, *** notably ******* **** ****** imager ****** **** ** the **** ***** (***-* sensor). ************, *****'* *********** 8.5mm **** ** **** smaller **** ******* **-***** lenses, **** ** *** 10-22mm ***** ***** ** the **** ****** *****.

Imager **** **********

*** ***** ******'* ***** Four ****** ****** ** notably ******* **** *** Axis ***-* ******, ***** below.

Lens *************

***** ****** **** * single *** ****, **** a ***° ***** ** view (*.***, **.*). ************, while ***** **** ***** states:

"**** ****** ** ********** with *** **** ** M43 ******, ********* ***** and ********* ****-***** ******."

*******, ** *** *******, the ****** *** ****** to ***** **** ***** an *** ***** **.* Panasonic/Leica **** (***** *****). When *****, ***** **** support ****** **** **** do *** ******* ***-***** lenses.

Axis ***** *********: **** ***********

*****'* **** ** **** options ** * *** disadvantage *** *** *** shared ** ***** ***** imager *******. *** *******, the **** ***** ***** with ***** ********* **** options *** *** ********** with ****** ** *** tests, ******* **** **** angle (~***°) ** ********* (~12°).

** **** ****, *** Axis ***** **** *** 10-22mm **** ****** (**** a **** **.* *-****) as ***** **** ****** were *** ****** ** fairly **** ******* *** Dahua *****'* **** ***/**** F ****. ******* ** this, *** ***** *********** of *** ***** ** reduced ** **** ****, as ******* ***** **** needed ** ** ********* too *** ***** *** realistic ******* ** ********** for *** ***********.

*** *******, ** *** original **** ** *** Q1659, ****** ** ******* PPF ****** (** *** shown *****) **** ************* brighter, ****** ***** ****** details.

***** ******* *** ***** examples ** ***** *** light *********** ****** *** our *****:**** **** ***** ****** Tested******* ** **** ***** Size ******** (***** ** SNC-VB770).

Versus **** ***-*****

******** ******'* **** ***-***** (*** our ****), *** ******* ******** dimmer ****** **** **** detail. *** *******, ********* the ******* ******* ****** from **** ***** ****, the **** ****** ******** much ******** ******, **** detection **** ******, ****** facial ****** ******* *****.

Super *** ***** *********** (

** **** *** ***** below *.***, *** ****** produces ***** ****** ** the ******* ** **** range (~** ***), ****** than *** ********* **** which ******* **** ***** digital ***** *** *** Q1659, ***** **** *** display *** ******* ** test *****. *** ****** ExtraLux ****** ******** *** best ****** ** **** light *****.

******** ********, *** ***** camera **** *** ******* usable ******* ** *** subject, **** ***** *********, though ***** ******** ****** than ********* *** ****.

*******, ** ~**', *** Dahua ****** ***** *** subject *******, **** **** the ****** ****** ********* solid *********.

Low ***** *********** (*-***)

**** **** ******** ****** on, *** ******* ****** from ************ ** *** subject *** **** *****, but *** ***** ****** provided *** ******** ****** of *** *******. *** Axis ***** *** ******* bad ***** *** ****** resolution *** *********** *** (122 **. **).

******** ********, ****** **** others ****** *********** *** unclear, ***** *** ***** HF8835 ***** ******** ***** facial ******.

Full *****

** **** *****, *** Dahua ****** ******** ******** more ****** ** *** test ***** **** *** Axis *****, **** **** even ********.

******** ********, ******* ** the ******* *** ******* to *** **** *****.

*******, ** ~**' ********, details ** *** ******* remain ******* ** *** Axis *****, *** ****** than ******.

Lens **********

******* ** *** **** angle ** ****/***** ***** length, *** ***** *.*** lens ******** ********** ********** at *** **** ** the ***** ** ****. For *******, *** ******* is ********** ******* ** the ***** ** *** image *****:

************, **** ******* ******* of *** ******* *** chart, ***** *****. *** Axis ***** ******* ************* less **** **** *****. While *** ******* ** still *******/******, ******* ****** clearer ** *** **** camera.

WDR ***********

*** ***** ******* ****** 140dB "***** ***", ***** we ****** ** * warehouse *****, ***** *****. Note **** **** ***** was ****** ** ******* samples ** *********** *********** differences, ****** ***** *** unlikely ** ***** * warehouse **** **** * single ** ** **** camera.

*** ******* ********* ****** than *** ***** ****** in **** *****, **** clear ****** **** ******* strong *********, ** **** as ** *** ****** are ****** *** ****, where ***** ****** ******** worse *******.

VMS *******

** *** *****, *** HF8835F ********** ***** *** Dahua ****** ** ********, Exacq, *******, *********, *** via ***** ** ******* Optix/Hanwha ****, ****** ** is *** ************ ****** as ********* ** *** of ***** *****. ****** configuration ****** ******** ** all ***** *****, **** camera **** *** *** camera ******* ********* ** Avigilon, *****, *******, *** Milestone.

** ***** *****, *** H.265 ****** ********** ******** in *****, *******, *** Milestone.

Bandwidth **********

***** *.***, *********'* ***** ***** *******, *** *******'* ******** are ******* ***** **** the **** ***** *** and *****, ****** **** higher **** *** ***** models ******.

*******, ****** **** *** megapixel, *** ***** ****** performs ***** **** *** and *****, ******* ****** the **** ******* *** megapixel ****** *** ***, and ~**% ****** ** night.

Limited ***** ******* **** *******

****** *** *****, *****'* North ******* **** ******* admitted **** **** ********** with *** *******. *** questions ***** ******** ****** a **** **** ** a ****** ***** ** answer.

*** ********* ** ******** were *******, *** *****. For *******, **** ****** about ***** ***** **** support (********* *****), ***** did *** ******* *** support *** ******* ** the ***** **** ******** with *** ******, ** whether ********** ******* **** planned, **** ******* **** the ****** **** *** support ***** ******.

Firmware ******** ****

*** **** ******* ******** available ** *** **** of ******* *** ****:

  • ***** ***-*******: *.***.*******.*.* ***** 2017-11-15
  • **** *****: *.**.*
  • ****** ***-*****: *.*********
  • ********* **-***********-*: **.*.** ***** 170310

Comments (20)

FWIW, several people have tried alternate lenses here with varying degrees of success.

The camera has an (auto) back focus adjustment, yes?

Btw, lol at this:

A direct from Asia seller on IPCamTalk is selling it at 1/2 of what the USA price is. Quite the channel management.

It has a button on the camera and in the web interface that says auto focus, yes. But they didn't do anything in our tests. 

I believe it's auto focus, not auto back focus, and aimed at driving motorized lenses, but that simply didn't work. If it were auto back focus, we would've heard the imager move. 

 

I believe it's auto focus, not auto back focus, and aimed at driving motorized lenses, but that simply didn't work. If it were auto back focus, we would've heard the imager move.

Is their lens motorized? 

Maybe there is a m43 equivalent of the c to cs adapter ring :)

No, it is not.

There are M43 to other lens type adapters, but it's even less realistic to expect that users would purchase an EF lens just to adapt it to this camera, given the price tag of low F stop EF lenses, often $1,000+.

There are M43 to other lens type adapters...

No, I meant like a spacer ring to extend the focal length without changing the threads, like a c-cs spacer.  Half joking as well.

No, it is not.

The A&E doc does claim it:

Curiously the official image seems to show a different lens, a SLR Magic f1.6:

Also interesting in that link is multiple people testing EF lenses with adapters with the camera. I really do not see why others should not work, and was baffled when the other lens we tried did not. 

Regardless, Dahua flat out says it does not support other lenses, so it's a use at your own risk situation. 

I tried different manual focus lenses and it worked fine. Strange. 

Also, next time you can check Dahua Accessorie selector, you will get all lens options. Currently there are two models from Dahua available and I prefer this one, much more light. 

PFL2070-J12M

 

Thanks for that link. That is a much more reasonable F-Stop and AOV. Unfortunately, that lens is not yet shipping in NA, and tech support wasn't even aware of it. We will keep an eye out for it and update here when it's available to us.

This is the vari focal lens on HDCVI version of this camera: LEns for 4/3" Dahua camera

 

Looking at our pricelists there is a varifocal lens for this camera too. I will try to get more details and post them later.

The lens is a DH-PFL2070-J12M which is a 20 to 70mm varifocal lens.

Some Specs.

Model DH-PFL2070-J12M
Parameter
Image format 4/3”
Focal length 20~70mm
Lens pixel 12MP
Aperture F1.5
Mount M43
Field Angle (D*H*V) 4096*2160(17:9) W: 55°x 48.1°x 24.9°
T: 17.9°x 15.9°x 8.4°
3704*2778(4:3) W: 55°x 43.3°x 32.2°
T: 17.9°x 14.4°x 10.8°
3840*2160(16:9) W: 52.1°x 45°x 24.9°
T: 17°x 14.9°x 8.4°
Lens Control Focus Manual
Iris Manual
IR Correction No
M.O.D. 3m(9.84ft)
Dimension ɸ73x149.2mm(ɸ2.87”x5.87”)
Weight 0.99kg(2.18lb)
Operating temperature -30℃~+70℃(-22℉~158℉)
Humidity <90% RH

Is this a Nova or Nova2 chipset/firmware or something entirely different? I don't see this version correlating with anything I have on hand.

It's Nova2 from the wiki.

DH_IPC-HX8XXX-Wei-Nova2_EngSpnFrn_N_Stream3_V2.622.0000001.2.R.171115

Oooh, looks like it's a new chipset. Not a pure Nova2....I wonder what the "Wei" portion is for.

My curiosity is piqued. Time to bug a few engineers @ Dahua.

Note: We originally listed the F-stop of the Axis 10-22mm lens as 2.8, but it is actually 3.5, an even greater difference compared to the F1.2/F1.4 lenses used in past tests. We've corrected this above.

I didn't understand why to do a comparison between 4K, 20MP and 1080p cameras.. is almost like to compare bananas and watermelons, does not make sense. I think the right Axis camera to be compared with Dahua HF8835F is P1368, dont you think?
Of course the 20MP sensor camera will perform worst in dark and will generate a biger net troughput.

I would like to see a Axis Q1659 vs Avigilon 24L-H4PRO-B super hight resolution cameras comparison. It would be interesting.

I think the right Axis camera to be compared with Dahua HF8835F is P1368, dont you think?

Rafael, it's a good question but not the right conclusion, at least if focusing on low light performance. The P1368 is the same resolution as the Dahua tested here (8MP) but according to Axis own specs the Q1659 has ~10x better low light performance than the P1368.

From the 20MP Axis Q1659 datasheet:

From the 8MP Axis P1368 datasheet:

The 8MP P1368 has a 1/2.5" sensor while the Axis 20MP Q1659 sensor is vastly larger which is likely the main reason that Axis itself specs the 20MP as so much better in low light.

To be clear, we are not opposed to testing other models but the rationale in this shootout was to pick cameras that we know from previous tests are strong in low light.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,438 reports, 865 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Dahua Temperature Measurement Station Tested on Jun 17, 2020
Dahua hit the market hard with its original 'fever' camera (tested here)....
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30...
Tiandy Super Starlight Cameras Tested on Apr 30, 2020
Tiandy is taking aim at China competitors Dahua and Hikvision, with a new...
TVT / InVid White Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Mar 18, 2020
With mega China manufacturers Dahua and Hikvision facing both bans and human...
Sunell Panda Cam Body Temperature Measurement Camera Tested on May 14, 2020
Sunell is far less well known than its gargantuan domestic competitors Dahua...
FLIR A Series Temperature Screening Cameras Tested on Jun 04, 2020
FLIR is one of the biggest names in thermal and one of the most conservative....
Vivotek LPR Camera Tested on Apr 15, 2020
Vivotek has historically sold license plate capture cameras but not LPR. Now,...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an...
Leica Launches LIDAR / Thermal / IP Camera on Mar 04, 2020
Swiss manufacturer Leica is launching what it calls a "real-time reality...
Hikvision and Uniview Entry Level Thermal Handheld Cameras Tested on Jun 05, 2020
While most screening systems cost $10,000 or more, manufacturers such as...
Mobotix 7 Line Camera Tested on Mar 12, 2020
Mobotix is attempting a turn-around, struggling for years, then releasing the...
IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan / US startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to...
Mobotix Thermal Detection Camera Tested on Jun 09, 2020
For years Mobotix has struggled but now sales are surging driven by Mobotix's...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System Tested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to...
TVT Temperature Measurement Terminal Tested on Jul 23, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision get the most attention for China temp products,...

Recent Reports

VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
Motorola Solutions Acquires Pelco on Aug 03, 2020
Motorola Solutions has acquired Pelco, pledging to bring blue back and make...
False: Verkada: "If You Want To Remote View Your Cameras You Need To Punch Holes In Your Firewall" on Jul 31, 2020
Verkada falsely declared to “3,000+ customers”, “300 school districts”, and...