Genetec's ******* ***** ****
****** ******* ** *** ** *******'* 'Unified' ******** ********, **** *** ******* even ******* ******* **"**** **** ********". *******, *********** ****** **** *** platform ** *** ******, ***** ********* an ********* ************ '****** **********' **** confusingly **** *** ******** ******* *** doors ******.
*******'* '****** ****** **********' ** ***** Link, * ~$*,*** ***** ********* **** integrates **** ***********, ******** **** ****, and ********* ****** **** *** ******** platform.
******** ************* ***** **** ***** **** similar ** *** ********* *****, **** the ********* ******* **** *** ***** access *******, ******* ** ***** **** the ***** ** *******'* '***-***********' ****** ******:

*** ******* ******* ***** ******* ******** hardware, **** *****/**** ***********, ** **** and ******** *****, ***** **** ** the ***** *********** ***** ******* ******* software *** ****** ********.
*******, ********* ****** *** ******* ******** Cloud **** **** *** ******** ** integrates ** ***** **** ** *** competition **** ** ******* ******. ** examine *******'* ************* *****.
Cloud ****'* ***********
** ***** ** ********** *** ***** Link ** ********* ****** ** ********, knowing *******'* ******* ****** *** ***** Link ** *******.
******* ********* ******* ***** **** ** replace ******* ********'* ** *** ** series *********** ** *********** *** ******** I/O ******, *** ** ******.
**** ***** **** ******* ******** **** Cloud ****'* ***********, ********** ********** ******** eliminating *******'* '*********** ***********'******* ~$*** - $*,*** ***** ********* ***** *** *******.
*******, ******* *** ************ ******** ****************, ******* ******** *** ******** **** too.
******* ***** **** ***** '************' **** to ******* ******* ** ******, ******* has ****** *** '****** **********' ******** and ******* *** **** ********* ** a ******* ********* ******* '***** ******' appliance.
Relaunching *** *** ** '***** **** '
******* ***** ********** '***** ****' ** the*** ** ****, ********* ** ** *************, ******* circuit ***** ******. ** ****,******* ***** ***, ********* ** **** Cloud ****, ***** **** *** **** ********* but ******** *** **** ** * stand-alone **** ******:

Genetec ******** ***** ****... *********
*** ** *** ********* ******* ** how ******* ********* ******** ***** ****, but ***** ***** ** ** ******** based ** ***** ******** ******* ** 3rd ***** *********** *** ****.
*** *******, ***** **** ** ******** when *********** ******* ******** ******, **** A1001/1601 ***********, *** **** *** ******** locks ** *******'* ******** (*** *********) products.
*******, *** *********** ** ******* *** HID **** *** ***** ***********, ***** are ******* ** ********* ******** **** Genetec's '****** *******' ********* ********* **********.
********* ** **** **********'* ********************* ***. *** *****, ** ********* is ****** ** ********* *** **** Mercury *** **** ********.
******* ************ ****:
*** ******* *************,we **** ********** ******** ***** **** ************ ****** *** ***-**-*** *********** 100 Series and 300 series offering support for the Mercury LP/EP and AXIS A1001 and A1601 integration without Synergis Cloud Link hardware.
*** ********* ** **** ********* *** Genetec's '***-**-***' **********, *** ***** **** is *** ****** ******, ** *** is ** ****** *** ****** ***********, more ****** ****** ***** '******** ****' installs?
Other ******* ** *** ******* ******* *********
***** '*******' ******* ** *** ******* an ********** ~$*,*** *** ** ******* local ******.
** **** ** ****** ******, ******* assigns '****** ******* ********** ****' ** a ***** **** ********** (**: ******, Network/Micro ****):

*** ****** **'* '****** ******* **********', Genetec ***** **** ** **********, *** able ** ******* *** ***** ****** as **** ******* *****:

******* *******: ******* **** *** **** Mercury ******** ** *******, *** ******** no *****/**** ********* ** ***:

Cloud **** *** **** ***** ******
*** ** *** *** ******** ** the ********* ** ***** ** ** a ***** ********** ****** ***** *** cloud-based ******** *******.
*** ****, ***** **** ******** * valuable *******, *** * ***** ********* to *********** *********** ****** *** ********** local *******, ***********, *** ****** ** provided ** ***** ****.
*******, ******* '*****' *********** *** ********, with ******* ******* *** *********** ******** of *** ******* ****** ******* **** deploy *** **-*******, ******* ********* *******.
******, *** ******* ********* ** **:
***** **** ****** * ****** ******* to *** ***** ************ ******** *** strongly ************* ************** ******* ***** ******* and *** ***** ********.
But ***** **** **********
*** ******* ***** ******** ***** **** for ***-***** *******. ** ***** *** company *** *** ****** ** ******** for '*****' ********, **** ** '*****/******' access ** *** * ******? **** responded:
******** ***** **** ****** **** **** a ******* ** *** ***** **** added *************, **** ***********, **********, *** security. *******, *****-********* ** **** ********** for ********* ******* *** * ******-***** option. ******* **** *** ***** ** not ** **** ***** ****** ******* to *** ***** *****, ******** ***** Link ****** * **** ** ***** with ** ***** ** ****** *** topology ** ****** ***** ******** **********.
Comments (62)
Undisclosed #1
I would say this is not actually true. You can connect HID's VertX V100/V200/V300 modules directly to the Cloudlink's RS-485 ports and the Cloudlink will act as the master controller without the need to add the VertX V1000 master controller. I have many clients who have done this due to the very low cost of deployment with little to no loss of functionality.
Create New Topic
Sean Nelson
06/18/19 04:36pm
"Complex, Costly, and Confusing"
doesnt this fall in line with all Genetec products or naw?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #2
This is the exact reason I never push Genetec access control when I don't have to. I never liked the concept or the embedded XP/7 versions (bad design). It is about time someone posted a comparison. Ccure9000, Onguard for large enterprise scalability and Synergis by demand or bid only. Hirsch, Amag for DOD accounts and anything else under the sun for the rest of the small systems.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #3
I wish there was a way for Genetec to see this post and understand the frustration the Cloud Link causes, but I don't think it will happen. I have brought this up many many times but get shut down every time. Back in the day it made sense because our options were the V100s and SMC. Then we were hooking MR panels to the SMC. Then Genetec said they are no longer supporting Mercury hardware. Then they came back and said they will but with the EP panel like you mentioned - to "respect the Mercury architecture".
The SCL is just running Windows 7 embedded with a very small program call Softwire running on it. It is a translator. It would make more sense to be turned into a role or run it as a service on the Access Control Manager but I don't see that happening. The software will clearly run on any Windows instance but they have gone to great lengths to prevent it from running anywhere else. This "3 tier architecture" is ridiculous. If want to design an entire site of LP/MR panels and all of the servers are VMs where the customer has clustering abilities and now I have to buy this piece of hardware and bolt it to the wall for the LP panels to talk. If the hardware dies or that building goes away we are now stuck without a connect. Yes, Genetec will sell you the Softwire program to run in your own VM environment, for $8k whereas the the SCL is $1k or the SV-100 is $1,200. It makes using Mercury hardware not cost effective for small sites, so we typically go with the SCL and V100s. However, as soon as you do that and the customer wants to leave Genetec the SCL is useless and Genetec is no longer "open platform". Stop making and selling hardware and stick to the software.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #4
The Cloudlink is definitely an "added" device, but 1.) it's not that costly (in the grand scheme of any "Enterprise" deployment), 2.) it's not confusing, and 3.) there is a legitimate reason for it.
For those familiar with Lenel, the best comparison that I have heard is that the Cloudlink is very much like a Comm Server. While I won't get into the weeds on Comm Servers, they basically are where the bulk of the transactions are processed into the server/database itself. Adding too many controllers/readers/transactions/cameras/inputs/etc onto a single Comm Server can result in the system becoming overloaded and transactions taking longer to process, alarms not populating correctly, etc.
The Cloudlink is effectively a Comm Server, in that it is what does the initial buffering and communications of all the transactions that enter into the system. This is especially important in the Genetec environment where they accept multiple different types of access control hardware -- it allows them to be even further agnostic than most other access control systems on the market in terms of what they can support. You mention S2, but S2 supports only S2 and Mercury hardware. You mention Feenics, but they ONLY support Mercury. There aren't many access platforms on the market that accept as many different hardware types as Genetec -- Mercury, HID, Axis, and then all of the various wireless platforms.
The other thing that I will add is that of course the number of Cloud access control deployments is low -- the product has barely been on the market a year, and it's still being developed to where it has a competitive feature-set with their on-premise solution. That said, I've deployed one cloud-based access system with Genetec, and it was by far one of the easiest deployments I've ever done. The CloudLink sync'd up with the CloudAccessManager immediately and it was online within minutes. We also Federated two Stratocast cameras in with it, so all of it is visible within SecurityDesk, including cameras linked to doors and events. With the added ability to Federate those cloud-based systems into a larger Genetec environment, it is a powerful deployment option for a large number of situations.
The one complaint I will definitely throw out there -- the name is just stupid and confusing. Putting the word "cloud" into any product should result in someone being tarred and feathered. It creates so much confusion with people who don't understand the architecture and makes them think there is more "cloud" involved in something when it's just used for a typical on-premise deployment...
Create New Topic
Undisclosed End User #5
I'm glad im not the only one thats confused as all hell about the purpose this device serves and when/why its actually needed
All i want to know is whats the path to functional threat levels if i have a bunch of sites with v100/etc connected to v1000 in genetec? My understanding is that threat levels wont work without these?
should i still be buying v100/v200/v1000?
should i just be buying these things?
Should i be replacing the v100/v1000 crap?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #7
I am a long time Genetec dealer. Undisclosed #4's write up above is right on the money. Great summary and comparison. My biggest issue is cost, the functionality achieved when used in a standard type enterprise access control solution - it is way to expensive. Note that the functionality of the cloudlink can be achieved in certain Genetec servers i.e. the physical cloudlink is not required.
Create New Topic
Despina Stamatelos
This is Despina Stamatelos, Product Marketing Manager for Access Control, at Genetec.
Brian, thank you for your article and opinion on the Synergis Cloud Link appliance. I also appreciate all the comments on here which we are carefully reading and taking into consideration for future improvements.
Overall, the access control market is a traditional one and we are challenging the status quo by innovating and introducing solutions that give our customers more options to design their system in a cost-effective and resilient manner. Given this, I would like to address three major points that come across in your article and the interesting discussion it has generated:
The Cloud Link is too expensive as a “Master Controller”
Synergis Cloud Link isn’t a master controller. Synergis Cloud Link is a micro-server that reduces the total cost of ownership. For multi-site deployments, which represent the majority of our customer base, Synergis Cloud Link replaces the need for a Commercial Off-the-Shelf server at remote sites, therefore, reducing the total cost of ownership associated with purchasing and maintaining a server throughout its lifetime. However, customers always have the option to install the software on their server.
Synergis Cloud Link is complex and confusing
Proprietary systems are simple and easy to understand. Offering customers a truly open architecture enables them to protect their investment for years to come. As a provider of a truly open architecture, we offer our customers choices on how to design and deploy our system using hardware from Mercury, HID, AXIS, Salto, Assa Abloy, just to name a few.
Cloud Link for rare Access Control as a Service
There’s a big interest in ACaaS, particularly on the enterprise side. With Synergis Cloud Link we are future-proofing our customer’s system and investment by ensuring that they are ready to go to the cloud when they wish to do so.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #8
So I don't see many comments on "why" the CL is used, can you talk about some of the added benefits of the PACS solution with using the CL such as P2P Global Anti-Passback w/o host comms, support for Wireless Locks w/o additional gateways, STid Support etc. It's pretty powerful device that allows Genetec to develop more features for the Mercury hardware for users to take advantage of.
Create New Topic
Christophe Helies
I think this article is interesting but lack some perspective ans the unit is made for a worldwide audience, so that it can accomodate many "local" market request.
The Cloudlink can be a door controler in a very extreme case that is used currently in France for very high end security.
For some history: in this country , there is a national bureau called ANSSI (roughly translated as National Agency for IT Security) that devised a rought certification in acces control. (called CSPN)
in this method, the reader needs to be totally "dumb" and is connected throught a RS485 directly to the master controler and only the controler, not the reader can decode the cypher, then read the card, and afterward take the decision.
the cypher is contain in 3 SAM card that can fit in the unit and those are design to be wiped out if you remove them from the unit without authorisation.
in this configuration throught its RS485 ports, and extension ports it can connect directly to 16 doors.
(but you still need some V100 or V200 to open the doors, V100 so you don't pay the licence fee, or V200 if you don't care about price)
this is a little step up from the OSDPv2 protocol and only 4 supplier currently pass this national certification step.
The older cloudlink cannot do it by the way, only those with the red strip on it.
some other functionnalities are not support without the cloudlink on a Security system such as turnstile mode and global anti passback for instance.
So even if it need some improvment, I still like this module as it simplifies my work on many project, since a lot of ACS system in Europe are still very proprietary for security Reason.
Create New Topic
Christophe Helies
yes, it's to mitigate the possibility of somebody removing the reader to retro engineer the secret and /or cypher in the device.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed
It appears to be an unimaginative industrial intel PC brick. I assumed it was the Linux kludge they duct-taped on the side of their existing windows-based architecture. They seem tone-deaf when you point out the pain this causes during use, troubleshooting, upgrading (and probably pricing, that old fashioned brick can't be cheap.) I'm all for panel diversity but really people can't you just toss in another DLL and have your PACS talk to 12 different vendors? The current architecture suggests a lack of (focus, sane licensing terms, product requirements, engineering maturity.)
Create New Topic
Jargal Jalsan
08/25/20 12:03pm
Hi all,
I can't login to 2 of my Cloudlinks. Ping is ok. Can't load web link. Also can't reset it even followed the instruction. Please give me advice.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #8
I don't get why this is so hard to grasp, yes we all agree that it could be done with out the "Brick" as its often reffered to but it is no differnt then having to stand up a Lenel Comm Server to handle traffic. In fact the Comm Server metodolgy can be more costly in terms of supporting, MS/VM Licensing, rack space, patcing etc. For those opperating in a large enterprise PACS deployment this is not really an issue, when I say Enterprise I mean 250K+ cardholders, 10K+ openings.
Create New Topic