Cisco Favorability Ratings - Positive In Networking, Negative In Surveillance

By: Brian Karas, Published on Jan 06, 2017

Cisco is the big name in networking, but they have not been able to leverage their brand and sizable sales channel in the security industry to the same effect. Over the years the company has come and gone in terms of being highly active in the security market, with their most recent push in security being the very expensive Meraki camera.

Security integrators were split in the favorability ratings, with Cisco's strength in networking praised, but their expensiveness and their failures within video surveillance criticized.

***** ** *** *** name ** **********, *** they **** *** **** able ** ******** ***** brand *** ******* ***** channel ** *** ******** industry ** *** **** effect. **** *** ***** the ******* *** **** and **** ** ***** of ***** ****** ****** in *** ******** ******, with ***** **** ****** push ** ******** ***** the **** ********* ****** ******.

******** *********** **** ***** in *** ************ *******, **** Cisco's ******** ** ********** praised, *** ***** ************* and ***** ******** ****** video ************ **********.

[***************]

Cisco *******

*****'* *** ** ******* *** neutral ****** **** ******* positive ****** *** ******* above ******* ******** ****.

Networking ********

*** ******* ********, *********** often ********* **** ***** produced * *******, ****-********* product.

  • "****** * ** ******* equipment."
  • "**** *** ***** ********."
  • "**** ******** *** ********** solutions."
  • "**** *** **********, ***, access ******* ** ****, naah. **** ****** ***** been ** **** ******."
  • "***** *********** ****** ** video ************, **** ****** their ******* ******* *** ubiquitous."
  • "**** ***** ******* ** the ********."
  • "**** ** **********. ** one ***** **** ** security, * ***** **** are **********."
  • "** *** ***** ******** as **** ** **** than *** *****."
  • "******** **** * ********** standpoint. *** ******** ********. Lots ** *******, **** IT ********, **** ***** get *** ** ******* with ** *****. *** be ************* ********* ** configure *** ******, *** overall, * ***** *******."
  • "**** ***** ********, *** SG300 ****** ** * staple ** *** ** our ** ***** ************ installations."
  • "********* ********** ********. ***'* know **** ** **** business."
  • "* ***’* *** ***** cameras ** ***. ******* I ** *** ********* of ***** ***** ******** switches **** * **** to ****** ******** *** IP *****."
  • "***** **** *** ******** for ********** ********."

******, ***** *************'* ******** ******* ****** ********** *** **** ****** results.

*********

******** ** ***** ********* both *** ******* ******** and *** ******** ********. Cisco ** *** ***** for *** ******, *** the **** ** *** bottom ***** **** **** make ** **** ********* for **** ** **** a ******* ***** ** the ******** ******.

  • "*********, ******** *** ******* poor ****."
  • "********** *** **** ** use ******* *********** ********."
  • "****, **** ******."
  • "******** *** *** *********."
  • "**** ******* ***** ** premium ******."
  • "**********, ******, ******* ** laurels."
  • "*********; ******* ****** *** compete ******* **** ****** IT ********* *** ******** that *** ** ****** than ****** **** *** much **** **** *********."
  • "** *** ********, **** are **** ****** ***, there ***** ** ** a ******* **** *** the *****."
  • "***** ******** *** *********, but *** ** * bit **********."
  • "***** *******. ******** *****."
  • "*** ******* ** **** priced *** **** ** our *************."
  • "** ***********. *********. ** rarely ***." 

No ******* ** ********

**********'* *********** ** ***** in *** ******** ****** shows * ******* **** of ******* *** *****, the ******** ******** ** how ***** ** ****** in *** **/********** ******.

  • "** ***** ** ************ their ******* ** ******** lacking."
  • "***'* *** **** **** often. ****** ******* **** bad. ****** ******* **** super ***********. **** ** drift ** *** *** of *** ******."
  • "*****... **** * ****. In *** ********, *** of *** ********, *** a *** *** ****-***** product, **** ** *** to *** ******** **** and *** ******** *****'* understand **** ****'** ******** to *** ******* ******** product ** ****** *********** by *** ****** ******* gear *****. * ******** example ** **** ***** than **** **** **** to ** **** **, and **** ***'* ** a **** *** **** it."
  • "* **** *** ** meet * ******** **** is ***** **** ***** security ********, **** ******** about ******* ******* *** high ****."
  • "***** ** *** ******* from **** ** ******* once. ** *** * spoke ** **** *** to *** ** *******, and **** **** **** finally ***** * ***, I *** ** **** through **** *****. ******* also *** * *** reputation **** ****** *'** worked ****."
  • "***** *** *** * parade ** *** ***** surveillance, ****** ******* *** physical ******** *********. **** have ********, ***'* *** third-party ******* **** ** their *********. **** **** tried ** *** * hold ** *** *********** leverage *** **/** ***** to *** ********* ** most ******** ***********. **** should ***** ** *** stratosphere ** ****-**** *** county-wide *********."
  • "**** * ******** ***********, they **** ** ** in *** *** ** the ******** ********."
  • "**** *** ***** **** to ****** *** ** use ***** *******. *** big ********** **** ***** is ** ** ***** they *** ** ***** third ******** ******** ********, none ** ** ********* compatible."
  • "**** ** ** *********** I **** **** **** enough. ********* ****** *********** about ************* ************ **** start *** ***********. ******** hardware. **** * ******** perspective, * ***'* ***** of ****. **** ******** in ***** *******, ***, card ******, ***."
  • "***** *** ***** ***** physical ******** *********. ***** in *** ***** *** always * *** ** sell **** ********."
  • "* ** *** **** that **** **** ******** out **** ***** ************. We **** **** ******* of ****** ******* **** their ******* ***** ***. I **** ** ** they ****'* ********* ** that **** ** ***** business *** ***** **** effort ***** *******."
  • "**** ****** ** ********** or **** * **** seem ***** **** ** their ***. ****** ********. Customers ****** **** ***********. The *** ***** ** have ******** * ***** VMS **** ********* **** (Geutebruck), **** **** ****** liked ** **** ******."
  • "**** **** *** **** in *** ****** **** the *****. ** ********** is **** **** ***** anybody *** ** ***** surveillance *** *** **** interested ** ******** ***** way **** *** ****** via ***** ********. **** took * **** ******* in ********* * *** years *** *** ********** it."
  • "**** ****** **** *****. Don't ***** **** ****** understand *** ******."
  • "***** **** *** *** best **** ** ***** to **********, *** ** security, ****'** *** ** capitalize ** ***** **********. I **** *** ***** that **** ***** ** able ** **** *** security ******** ** *****, but ** ** ******, even ****** ***** **** won't **** ***** ******** into *** ******** ******. They **** **** ** constantly ****** ***** ***** about ******* **** **** want ** ** ** this *****, ***** ***** partnership * **** ***** to *********."

Cisco ****** ** ********

***** ***** *** ****** challenges **** *** ***** surveillance *******. ******** ******* and ********* ************* ****** **** **** ***** * far **** ********** ******* than * ****** *** when **** **** ***** big ***** ************ ****. Developments ** ***** **** video ************ ******** ****** limited *** *** ****** ****** ** ****** cameras ** **** ** ** ********* of ***** *****-******* ******** *** SMB.

****** ***** ***** * major ******, *** ******* is ****** ** ******** on *** ****** ** being * ***** ****** of ********** ********* *** video ************ ******* *** a ***** ****** ******* in ******* *** ***** management ********.

Comments (4)

I recently completed certification training on Cisco's VMS and in my view it's junk, anybody buying this over Genetec or Milestone is raving mad in my view.

Cisco make great network gear, always have. They are using their reputation to try to push into other markets, CCTV being one of these and as is the way they have some massive clients. They want to sell you their cameras, connected to their switches, with their software on their servers and they normally do this having already sold a complete IT and telephony infrastructure to the client.

It's the same pitch as Schneider/Siemens/Honeywell/JCI/Tyco trying to bundle power distribution, fire, BMS, structured cabling & security into a single package, big clients love it as they feel safe with a trusted brand when allot of the time they end up with a collection of mediocre systems, an empty promise on 'complete integration' and a very expensive long term lock-in service level agreement.

I'm not saying the big boys don't have some excellent solutions, they do but generally not all at the same time. Schneider own APC, a world leader in UPS systems, they also own Pelco a CCTV has been. Honeywell own loads of great fire products, some decent access control but horrific CCTV. 

Maybe I'm missing something but if I was spending millions on a new building/campus/town/city I would want a team of professional people that can select the best products in each category in a way that protects my investment by not locking me into silly proprietary (or very restricted at best) systems that in the long cost more and are only ever just about adequate

Phil, thanks for the feedback. Do you recall any specific issues with Cisco's VMS? We have not looked at it in some time since market interest is overall very low (outside of Cisco pushing it for their house accounts).

From a feature point of view its about where Milestone and Genetec were circa 2008 and I really didn't like that its only supported on Cisco servers. If you buy their cameras they are free to add, if you use 3rd party cameras (the have limited support for Axis and Bosch and an early Onvif driver) you have to pay per channel license. They have some enterprise features in terms of scale-ability and decent fail-over options. When I looked at the numbers I found that on a 400 camera system I could do Axis or Sony with Genetec or Milestone for more or less the same price which for me is a far superior solution

I used to work for an integrator that was heavily invested in Cisco. Coming originally from an IT background I can say that their network equipment is great. Well designed, well built, and very reliable.

 

Cisco VSM, on the other hand, is a completely different story. I spent a LOT of time on the phone with Cisco TAC trying to resolve issues that should have been picked up during internal testing. While I haven't seen 7.9 in action, I have experience with every version from 6.3.2 to 7.8, and have found it to be a beta quality product at best. We had a customer that had issues with the Long Term Storage not working in VSM 7.5, which they required to work due to legal obligations. It took Cisco around 3 months to come up with a fix, which I recall was rolled into 7.5.1.

 

I also encountered lots of weird problems with cameras randomly dropping offline requiring a reboot or power cycle, server services going down (requiring either a Cisco service restart or server reboot), and motion detection not detecting motion. While working on another customer's system (an airport), I once saw a Boeing 737 pulling up right smack bang in front of the camera, and well and truly within the motion windows. It didn't pick up motion, and TAC couldn't understand why this was a problem.

 

I also saw a lot of problems with cameras failing, sometimes even out of the box. Given what Cisco charges for these cameras I find the failure rate that I experienced to be unacceptable. I especially RMA'd loads of CIVS-IPC-25xx/26xx cameras - I would usually find that the CCD would fail, causing either the colour to go all wonky, the image to flash, or the camera to just show no image.

 

I still use Cisco network equipment, and still find it to be fantastic, and consider Cisco to be one of the first companies I look towards for networking, but I cannot recommend Cisco VSM, or Cisco cameras.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Bosch Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
Bosch's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing strong net...
Genetec Favorability Report 2019 on Jan 25, 2019
Genetec's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing solid, but...
Uniview / UNV Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 12, 2019
Uniview / UNV, the self-proclaimed #3 China manufacturer, while starting late, has been working to make inroads internationally. In IPVM's 2019...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Network Optix Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 11, 2019
Network Optix is arguably the last new VMS. Founded in 2010, more than a decade after most client/server VMS offerings, the company has become a...
Eagle Eye Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 21, 2019
Eagle Eye has been the biggest spender in the cloud VMS market including (via their owner) acquiring Brivo for $50 million and CameraManager from...
Lenel Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 26, 2019
The positive news for Lenel is that integrators do not dislike them as much as they used to.  The negative news for Lenel is that integrators...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Motorola / Avigilon Drops ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
Motorola Solutions has pulled out of ISC West 2020 effective immediately, because of coronavirus concerns, IPVM has learned. This is done amidst...
Cancel or Not? Industry Split Over ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
The industry is split, polarized, over whether ISC West 2020 should run or be canceled. New IPVM survey results of 400+ respondents show heated...
Coronavirus Hits Sony, Bosch Says Switch on Feb 26, 2020
Sony's fall in video surveillance has been severe over the past decade. Now, they may be done. In this note, we examine Bosch's new...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London police, but this time the system was thwarted by technical problems and...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new IPVM test results show cause major problems for facial recognition...
Every VMS Will Become a VSaaS on Feb 21, 2020
VMS is ending. Soon every VMS will be a VSaaS. Competitive dynamics will be redrawn. What does this mean? VMS Historically...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance on Feb 20, 2020
This is the last chance to join IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the...
Vulnerability Directory For Access Credentials on Feb 20, 2020
Knowing which access credentials are insecure can be difficult to see, especially because most look and feel the same. Even insecure 125 kHz...