Cisco Favorability Ratings - Positive In Networking, Negative In Surveillance

By: Brian Karas, Published on Jan 06, 2017

Cisco is the big name in networking, but they have not been able to leverage their brand and sizable sales channel in the security industry to the same effect. Over the years the company has come and gone in terms of being highly active in the security market, with their most recent push in security being the very expensive Meraki camera.

Security integrators were split in the favorability ratings, with Cisco's strength in networking praised, but their expensiveness and their failures within video surveillance criticized.

***** ** *** *** name ** **********, *** they **** *** **** able ** ******** ***** brand *** ******* ***** channel ** *** ******** industry ** *** **** effect. **** *** ***** the ******* *** **** and **** ** ***** of ***** ****** ****** in *** ******** ******, with ***** **** ****** push ** ******** ***** the **** ********* ****** ******.

******** *********** **** ***** in *** ************ *******, **** Cisco's ******** ** ********** praised, *** ***** ************* and ***** ******** ****** video ************ **********.

[***************]

Cisco *******

*****'* *** ** ******* *** neutral ****** **** ******* positive ****** *** ******* above ******* ******** ****.

Networking ********

*** ******* ********, *********** often ********* **** ***** produced * *******, ****-********* product.

  • "****** * ** ******* equipment."
  • "**** *** ***** ********."
  • "**** ******** *** ********** solutions."
  • "**** *** **********, ***, access ******* ** ****, naah. **** ****** ***** been ** **** ******."
  • "***** *********** ****** ** video ************, **** ****** their ******* ******* *** ubiquitous."
  • "**** ***** ******* ** the ********."
  • "**** ** **********. ** one ***** **** ** security, * ***** **** are **********."
  • "** *** ***** ******** as **** ** **** than *** *****."
  • "******** **** * ********** standpoint. *** ******** ********. Lots ** *******, **** IT ********, **** ***** get *** ** ******* with ** *****. *** be ************* ********* ** configure *** ******, *** overall, * ***** *******."
  • "**** ***** ********, *** SG300 ****** ** * staple ** *** ** our ** ***** ************ installations."
  • "********* ********** ********. ***'* know **** ** **** business."
  • "* ***’* *** ***** cameras ** ***. ******* I ** *** ********* of ***** ***** ******** switches **** * **** to ****** ******** *** IP *****."
  • "***** **** *** ******** for ********** ********."

******, ***** *************'* ******** ******* ****** ********** *** **** ****** results.

*********

******** ** ***** ********* both *** ******* ******** and *** ******** ********. Cisco ** *** ***** for *** ******, *** the **** ** *** bottom ***** **** **** make ** **** ********* for **** ** **** a ******* ***** ** the ******** ******.

  • "*********, ******** *** ******* poor ****."
  • "********** *** **** ** use ******* *********** ********."
  • "****, **** ******."
  • "******** *** *** *********."
  • "**** ******* ***** ** premium ******."
  • "**********, ******, ******* ** laurels."
  • "*********; ******* ****** *** compete ******* **** ****** IT ********* *** ******** that *** ** ****** than ****** **** *** much **** **** *********."
  • "** *** ********, **** are **** ****** ***, there ***** ** ** a ******* **** *** the *****."
  • "***** ******** *** *********, but *** ** * bit **********."
  • "***** *******. ******** *****."
  • "*** ******* ** **** priced *** **** ** our *************."
  • "** ***********. *********. ** rarely ***." 

No ******* ** ********

**********'* *********** ** ***** in *** ******** ****** shows * ******* **** of ******* *** *****, the ******** ******** ** how ***** ** ****** in *** **/********** ******.

  • "** ***** ** ************ their ******* ** ******** lacking."
  • "***'* *** **** **** often. ****** ******* **** bad. ****** ******* **** super ***********. **** ** drift ** *** *** of *** ******."
  • "*****... **** * ****. In *** ********, *** of *** ********, *** a *** *** ****-***** product, **** ** *** to *** ******** **** and *** ******** *****'* understand **** ****'** ******** to *** ******* ******** product ** ****** *********** by *** ****** ******* gear *****. * ******** example ** **** ***** than **** **** **** to ** **** **, and **** ***'* ** a **** *** **** it."
  • "* **** *** ** meet * ******** **** is ***** **** ***** security ********, **** ******** about ******* ******* *** high ****."
  • "***** ** *** ******* from **** ** ******* once. ** *** * spoke ** **** *** to *** ** *******, and **** **** **** finally ***** * ***, I *** ** **** through **** *****. ******* also *** * *** reputation **** ****** *'** worked ****."
  • "***** *** *** * parade ** *** ***** surveillance, ****** ******* *** physical ******** *********. **** have ********, ***'* *** third-party ******* **** ** their *********. **** **** tried ** *** * hold ** *** *********** leverage *** **/** ***** to *** ********* ** most ******** ***********. **** should ***** ** *** stratosphere ** ****-**** *** county-wide *********."
  • "**** * ******** ***********, they **** ** ** in *** *** ** the ******** ********."
  • "**** *** ***** **** to ****** *** ** use ***** *******. *** big ********** **** ***** is ** ** ***** they *** ** ***** third ******** ******** ********, none ** ** ********* compatible."
  • "**** ** ** *********** I **** **** **** enough. ********* ****** *********** about ************* ************ **** start *** ***********. ******** hardware. **** * ******** perspective, * ***'* ***** of ****. **** ******** in ***** *******, ***, card ******, ***."
  • "***** *** ***** ***** physical ******** *********. ***** in *** ***** *** always * *** ** sell **** ********."
  • "* ** *** **** that **** **** ******** out **** ***** ************. We **** **** ******* of ****** ******* **** their ******* ***** ***. I **** ** ** they ****'* ********* ** that **** ** ***** business *** ***** **** effort ***** *******."
  • "**** ****** ** ********** or **** * **** seem ***** **** ** their ***. ****** ********. Customers ****** **** ***********. The *** ***** ** have ******** * ***** VMS **** ********* **** (Geutebruck), **** **** ****** liked ** **** ******."
  • "**** **** *** **** in *** ****** **** the *****. ** ********** is **** **** ***** anybody *** ** ***** surveillance *** *** **** interested ** ******** ***** way **** *** ****** via ***** ********. **** took * **** ******* in ********* * *** years *** *** ********** it."
  • "**** ****** **** *****. Don't ***** **** ****** understand *** ******."
  • "***** **** *** *** best **** ** ***** to **********, *** ** security, ****'** *** ** capitalize ** ***** **********. I **** *** ***** that **** ***** ** able ** **** *** security ******** ** *****, but ** ** ******, even ****** ***** **** won't **** ***** ******** into *** ******** ******. They **** **** ** constantly ****** ***** ***** about ******* **** **** want ** ** ** this *****, ***** ***** partnership * **** ***** to *********."

Cisco ****** ** ********

***** ***** *** ****** challenges **** *** ***** surveillance *******. ******** ******* and ********* ************* ****** **** **** ***** * far **** ********** ******* than * ****** *** when **** **** ***** big ***** ************ ****. Developments ** ***** **** video ************ ******** ****** limited *** *** ****** ****** ** ****** cameras ** **** ** ** ********* of ***** *****-******* ******** *** SMB.

****** ***** ***** * major ******, *** ******* is ****** ** ******** on *** ****** ** being * ***** ****** of ********** ********* *** video ************ ******* *** a ***** ****** ******* in ******* *** ***** management ********.

Comments (4)

I recently completed certification training on Cisco's VMS and in my view it's junk, anybody buying this over Genetec or Milestone is raving mad in my view.

Cisco make great network gear, always have. They are using their reputation to try to push into other markets, CCTV being one of these and as is the way they have some massive clients. They want to sell you their cameras, connected to their switches, with their software on their servers and they normally do this having already sold a complete IT and telephony infrastructure to the client.

It's the same pitch as Schneider/Siemens/Honeywell/JCI/Tyco trying to bundle power distribution, fire, BMS, structured cabling & security into a single package, big clients love it as they feel safe with a trusted brand when allot of the time they end up with a collection of mediocre systems, an empty promise on 'complete integration' and a very expensive long term lock-in service level agreement.

I'm not saying the big boys don't have some excellent solutions, they do but generally not all at the same time. Schneider own APC, a world leader in UPS systems, they also own Pelco a CCTV has been. Honeywell own loads of great fire products, some decent access control but horrific CCTV. 

Maybe I'm missing something but if I was spending millions on a new building/campus/town/city I would want a team of professional people that can select the best products in each category in a way that protects my investment by not locking me into silly proprietary (or very restricted at best) systems that in the long cost more and are only ever just about adequate

Phil, thanks for the feedback. Do you recall any specific issues with Cisco's VMS? We have not looked at it in some time since market interest is overall very low (outside of Cisco pushing it for their house accounts).

From a feature point of view its about where Milestone and Genetec were circa 2008 and I really didn't like that its only supported on Cisco servers. If you buy their cameras they are free to add, if you use 3rd party cameras (the have limited support for Axis and Bosch and an early Onvif driver) you have to pay per channel license. They have some enterprise features in terms of scale-ability and decent fail-over options. When I looked at the numbers I found that on a 400 camera system I could do Axis or Sony with Genetec or Milestone for more or less the same price which for me is a far superior solution

I used to work for an integrator that was heavily invested in Cisco. Coming originally from an IT background I can say that their network equipment is great. Well designed, well built, and very reliable.

 

Cisco VSM, on the other hand, is a completely different story. I spent a LOT of time on the phone with Cisco TAC trying to resolve issues that should have been picked up during internal testing. While I haven't seen 7.9 in action, I have experience with every version from 6.3.2 to 7.8, and have found it to be a beta quality product at best. We had a customer that had issues with the Long Term Storage not working in VSM 7.5, which they required to work due to legal obligations. It took Cisco around 3 months to come up with a fix, which I recall was rolled into 7.5.1.

 

I also encountered lots of weird problems with cameras randomly dropping offline requiring a reboot or power cycle, server services going down (requiring either a Cisco service restart or server reboot), and motion detection not detecting motion. While working on another customer's system (an airport), I once saw a Boeing 737 pulling up right smack bang in front of the camera, and well and truly within the motion windows. It didn't pick up motion, and TAC couldn't understand why this was a problem.

 

I also saw a lot of problems with cameras failing, sometimes even out of the box. Given what Cisco charges for these cameras I find the failure rate that I experienced to be unacceptable. I especially RMA'd loads of CIVS-IPC-25xx/26xx cameras - I would usually find that the CCD would fail, causing either the colour to go all wonky, the image to flash, or the camera to just show no image.

 

I still use Cisco network equipment, and still find it to be fantastic, and consider Cisco to be one of the first companies I look towards for networking, but I cannot recommend Cisco VSM, or Cisco cameras.

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

Cisco Video Surveillance Is Dead, Long Live Cisco Meraki Video Surveillance on Feb 11, 2020
A dozen years ago much of the industry thought that Cisco was destined to...
The Booming Multi-Billion Coronavirus Fever Camera Market on Apr 21, 2020
The market for elevated body temperature detection cameras, aka 'coronavirus...
Video Surveillance History on May 06, 2020
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going...
AI/Smart Camera Tutorial on Feb 20, 2020
Cameras with video analytics, sometimes called 'Smart' camera or 'AI'...
Cisco Acquiring Fluidmesh on Apr 09, 2020
Cisco announced it is acquiring niche wireless manufacturer...
Coronavirus Hits Manufacturers, Standing Now, Worse To Come on Apr 06, 2020
Coronavirus is hitting security manufacturers, though overall modestly for...
Milestone Presents XProtect On AWS on May 04, 2020
Milestone presented its XProtect on AWS offering at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020
While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of...
Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how...
Anixter Runs Fake Coronavirus Marketing Using Shutterstock Watermarked Images on Jul 24, 2020
Coronavirus faked marketing is regrettably commonplace right now but Anixter...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing...
NetApp Video Surveillance Profile on Mar 09, 2020
NetApp is increasing its efforts in video surveillance and told IPVM...
FLIR A Series Temperature Screening Cameras Tested on Jun 04, 2020
FLIR is one of the biggest names in thermal and one of the most conservative....
Directory of 95 Video Surveillance Startups on May 20, 2020
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see...

Recent Reports

Genetec CEO Declares "We Don't Negotiate Payment With Patent Trolls" on Aug 11, 2020
Are patent trolls like terrorists? Genetec's CEO is coming out strongly...
Hanwha AI Analytics Camera Tested on Aug 11, 2020
Hanwha has released their Wisenet P AI camera, adding person and vehicle...
Alabama Schools Million Dollar Hikvision Fever Camera Deal on Aug 11, 2020
The Baldwin County, Alabama public schools purchased a $1 million, 144-camera...
Dahua Taunts Australian Government, Continues To Sell Illegal Fever Cameras on Aug 10, 2020
Dahua is effectively taunting the Australian government by continuing to sell...
HID Releases VertX Replacement Aero on Aug 10, 2020
HID is replacing two established and broadly supported types of access...
NDAA Compliant Video Surveillance Whitelist on Aug 10, 2020
This report aggregates video surveillance products that manufacturers have...
Telpo China Temperature Tablets Tested on Aug 10, 2020
The provider for overseas companies ranging from Canon Singapore to US'...
Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...