Cisco Favorability Ratings - Positive In Networking, Negative In Surveillance

By Brian Karas, Published on Jan 06, 2017

Cisco is the big name in networking, but they have not been able to leverage their brand and sizable sales channel in the security industry to the same effect. Over the years the company has come and gone in terms of being highly active in the security market, with their most recent push in security being the very expensive Meraki camera.

Security integrators were split in the favorability ratings, with Cisco's strength in networking praised, but their expensiveness and their failures within video surveillance criticized.

Cisco *******

*****'* *** ** ******* *** neutral ****** **** ******* positive ****** *** ******* above ******* ******** ****.

Networking ********

*** ******* ********, *********** often ********* **** ***** produced * *******, ****-********* product.

  • "****** * ** ******* equipment."
  • "**** *** ***** ********."
  • "**** ******** *** ********** solutions."
  • "**** *** **********, ***, access ******* ** ****, naah. **** ****** ***** been ** **** ******."
  • "***** *********** ****** ** video ************, **** ****** their ******* ******* *** ubiquitous."
  • "**** ***** ******* ** the ********."
  • "**** ** **********. ** one ***** **** ** security, * ***** **** are **********."
  • "** *** ***** ******** as **** ** **** than *** *****."
  • "******** **** * ********** standpoint. *** ******** ********. Lots ** *******, **** IT ********, **** ***** get *** ** ******* with ** *****. *** be ************* ********* ** configure *** ******, *** overall, * ***** *******."
  • "**** ***** ********, *** SG300 ****** ** * staple ** *** ** our ** ***** ************ installations."
  • "********* ********** ********. ***'* know **** ** **** business."
  • "* ***’* *** ***** cameras ** ***. ******* I ** *** ********* of ***** ***** ******** switches **** * **** to ****** ******** *** IP *****."
  • "***** **** *** ******** for ********** ********."

******, ***** *************'* ******** ******* ****** ********** *** **** ****** results.

*********

******** ** ***** ********* both *** ******* ******** and *** ******** ********. Cisco ** *** ***** for *** ******, *** the **** ** *** bottom ***** **** **** make ** **** ********* for **** ** **** a ******* ***** ** the ******** ******.

  • "*********, ******** *** ******* poor ****."
  • "********** *** **** ** use ******* *********** ********."
  • "****, **** ******."
  • "******** *** *** *********."
  • "**** ******* ***** ** premium ******."
  • "**********, ******, ******* ** laurels."
  • "*********; ******* ****** *** compete ******* **** ****** IT ********* *** ******** that *** ** ****** than ****** **** *** much **** **** *********."
  • "** *** ********, **** are **** ****** ***, there ***** ** ** a ******* **** *** the *****."
  • "***** ******** *** *********, but *** ** * bit **********."
  • "***** *******. ******** *****."
  • "*** ******* ** **** priced *** **** ** our *************."
  • "** ***********. *********. ** rarely ***." 

No ******* ** ********

**********'* *********** ** ***** in *** ******** ****** shows * ******* **** of ******* *** *****, the ******** ******** ** how ***** ** ****** in *** **/********** ******.

  • "** ***** ** ************ their ******* ** ******** lacking."
  • "***'* *** **** **** often. ****** ******* **** bad. ****** ******* **** super ***********. **** ** drift ** *** *** of *** ******."
  • "*****... **** * ****. In *** ********, *** of *** ********, *** a *** *** ****-***** product, **** ** *** to *** ******** **** and *** ******** *****'* understand **** ****'** ******** to *** ******* ******** product ** ****** *********** by *** ****** ******* gear *****. * ******** example ** **** ***** than **** **** **** to ** **** **, and **** ***'* ** a **** *** **** it."
  • "* **** *** ** meet * ******** **** is ***** **** ***** security ********, **** ******** about ******* ******* *** high ****."
  • "***** ** *** ******* from **** ** ******* once. ** *** * spoke ** **** *** to *** ** *******, and **** **** **** finally ***** * ***, I *** ** **** through **** *****. ******* also *** * *** reputation **** ****** *'** worked ****."
  • "***** *** *** * parade ** *** ***** surveillance, ****** ******* *** physical ******** *********. **** have ********, ***'* *** third-party ******* **** ** their *********. **** **** tried ** *** * hold ** *** *********** leverage *** **/** ***** to *** ********* ** most ******** ***********. **** should ***** ** *** stratosphere ** ****-**** *** county-wide *********."
  • "**** * ******** ***********, they **** ** ** in *** *** ** the ******** ********."
  • "**** *** ***** **** to ****** *** ** use ***** *******. *** big ********** **** ***** is ** ** ***** they *** ** ***** third ******** ******** ********, none ** ** ********* compatible."
  • "**** ** ** *********** I **** **** **** enough. ********* ****** *********** about ************* ************ **** start *** ***********. ******** hardware. **** * ******** perspective, * ***'* ***** of ****. **** ******** in ***** *******, ***, card ******, ***."
  • "***** *** ***** ***** physical ******** *********. ***** in *** ***** *** always * *** ** sell **** ********."
  • "* ** *** **** that **** **** ******** out **** ***** ************. We **** **** ******* of ****** ******* **** their ******* ***** ***. I **** ** ** they ****'* ********* ** that **** ** ***** business *** ***** **** effort ***** *******."
  • "**** ****** ** ********** or **** * **** seem ***** **** ** their ***. ****** ********. Customers ****** **** ***********. The *** ***** ** have ******** * ***** VMS **** ********* **** (Geutebruck), **** **** ****** liked ** **** ******."
  • "**** **** *** **** in *** ****** **** the *****. ** ********** is **** **** ***** anybody *** ** ***** surveillance *** *** **** interested ** ******** ***** way **** *** ****** via ***** ********. **** took * **** ******* in ********* * *** years *** *** ********** it."
  • "**** ****** **** *****. Don't ***** **** ****** understand *** ******."
  • "***** **** *** *** best **** ** ***** to **********, *** ** security, ****'** *** ** capitalize ** ***** **********. I **** *** ***** that **** ***** ** able ** **** *** security ******** ** *****, but ** ** ******, even ****** ***** **** won't **** ***** ******** into *** ******** ******. They **** **** ** constantly ****** ***** ***** about ******* **** **** want ** ** ** this *****, ***** ***** partnership * **** ***** to *********."

Cisco ****** ** ********

***** ***** *** ****** challenges **** *** ***** surveillance *******. ******** ******* and ********* ************* ****** **** **** ***** * far **** ********** ******* than * ****** *** when **** **** ***** big ***** ************ ****. Developments ** ***** **** video ************ ******** ****** limited *** *** ****** ****** ** ****** cameras ** **** ** ** ********* of ***** *****-******* ******** *** SMB.

****** ***** ***** * major ******, *** ******* is ****** ** ******** on *** ****** ** being * ***** ****** of ********** ********* *** video ************ ******* *** a ***** ****** ******* in ******* *** ***** management ********.

Comments (4)

I recently completed certification training on Cisco's VMS and in my view it's junk, anybody buying this over Genetec or Milestone is raving mad in my view.

Cisco make great network gear, always have. They are using their reputation to try to push into other markets, CCTV being one of these and as is the way they have some massive clients. They want to sell you their cameras, connected to their switches, with their software on their servers and they normally do this having already sold a complete IT and telephony infrastructure to the client.

It's the same pitch as Schneider/Siemens/Honeywell/JCI/Tyco trying to bundle power distribution, fire, BMS, structured cabling & security into a single package, big clients love it as they feel safe with a trusted brand when allot of the time they end up with a collection of mediocre systems, an empty promise on 'complete integration' and a very expensive long term lock-in service level agreement.

I'm not saying the big boys don't have some excellent solutions, they do but generally not all at the same time. Schneider own APC, a world leader in UPS systems, they also own Pelco a CCTV has been. Honeywell own loads of great fire products, some decent access control but horrific CCTV. 

Maybe I'm missing something but if I was spending millions on a new building/campus/town/city I would want a team of professional people that can select the best products in each category in a way that protects my investment by not locking me into silly proprietary (or very restricted at best) systems that in the long cost more and are only ever just about adequate

Phil, thanks for the feedback. Do you recall any specific issues with Cisco's VMS? We have not looked at it in some time since market interest is overall very low (outside of Cisco pushing it for their house accounts).

From a feature point of view its about where Milestone and Genetec were circa 2008 and I really didn't like that its only supported on Cisco servers. If you buy their cameras they are free to add, if you use 3rd party cameras (the have limited support for Axis and Bosch and an early Onvif driver) you have to pay per channel license. They have some enterprise features in terms of scale-ability and decent fail-over options. When I looked at the numbers I found that on a 400 camera system I could do Axis or Sony with Genetec or Milestone for more or less the same price which for me is a far superior solution

I used to work for an integrator that was heavily invested in Cisco. Coming originally from an IT background I can say that their network equipment is great. Well designed, well built, and very reliable.

 

Cisco VSM, on the other hand, is a completely different story. I spent a LOT of time on the phone with Cisco TAC trying to resolve issues that should have been picked up during internal testing. While I haven't seen 7.9 in action, I have experience with every version from 6.3.2 to 7.8, and have found it to be a beta quality product at best. We had a customer that had issues with the Long Term Storage not working in VSM 7.5, which they required to work due to legal obligations. It took Cisco around 3 months to come up with a fix, which I recall was rolled into 7.5.1.

 

I also encountered lots of weird problems with cameras randomly dropping offline requiring a reboot or power cycle, server services going down (requiring either a Cisco service restart or server reboot), and motion detection not detecting motion. While working on another customer's system (an airport), I once saw a Boeing 737 pulling up right smack bang in front of the camera, and well and truly within the motion windows. It didn't pick up motion, and TAC couldn't understand why this was a problem.

 

I also saw a lot of problems with cameras failing, sometimes even out of the box. Given what Cisco charges for these cameras I find the failure rate that I experienced to be unacceptable. I especially RMA'd loads of CIVS-IPC-25xx/26xx cameras - I would usually find that the CCD would fail, causing either the colour to go all wonky, the image to flash, or the camera to just show no image.

 

I still use Cisco network equipment, and still find it to be fantastic, and consider Cisco to be one of the first companies I look towards for networking, but I cannot recommend Cisco VSM, or Cisco cameras.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,602 reports, 890 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Verkada Speaks On Disrupting Security Sales Channel on Aug 28, 2020
Verkada's fast growth has taken the industry by storm and their enterprise...
YOLOv5 Released Amidst Controversy on Jul 27, 2020
YOLO has gained significant attention within video surveillance for its...
Infinova, March Networks and Swann H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 02, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision, helped by fever camera sales, are recovering from...
Favorite Network Switches 2020 on Aug 31, 2020
Cisco has long been the gorilla of network switches but would an upstart...
The Kiosk Market Pivots To Temperature Screening (Interviewed) on Jul 28, 2020
Video surveillance is not the only market that has pivoted to medical device...
Favorite Access Control Credentials 2020 on Sep 15, 2020
Credential choice is more debated than ever, with hacking risk for 125kHz and...
Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020
While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of...
Access Control and Video Integration Statistics 2020 on Oct 08, 2020
Video Surveillance and Access Control are two of the most common security...
The NOT Outstanding Security Equipment Manufacturer 2020 on Oct 02, 2020
The "OSPAs" promised to be credible, transparent, and respectable. They have...
China's SMIC Hit By US Trade Restrictions, Impact On Video Surveillance on Oct 13, 2020
US trade restrictions have hit Semiconductor Manufacturing International...
Temperature Screening Is Ineffective, Says US, UK, Canada, Israel, And Ireland Health Leaders on Aug 25, 2020
Health leaders around the world are increasingly speaking out about the...
Verkada 2020 Cameras Image Quality Test on Oct 06, 2020
Verkada's first-generation cameras suffered from numerous video quality...
Six Flags' FDA Violating Outdoor Dahua Fever Cameras on Oct 26, 2020
As Six Flags scrambled to reopen parks amid plummeting revenues caused by the...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...

Recent Reports

Recruiters Online Show LIVE Today! on Oct 29, 2020
IPVM's 7th online show resumes today with 12 recruiters presenting themselves...
Hikvision AcuSense G2 Camera Test on Oct 29, 2020
Hikvision has released their next generation of AcuSense analytic cameras...
Biggest Problems Selling Access Control 2020 on Oct 29, 2020
Access control can cause integrators big headaches. What practical issues do...
Taiwan Geovision AI Analytics and NDAA Examined on Oct 29, 2020
Taiwan manufacturer Geovision's revenue has been falling for years. However,...
Bedside Cough and Sneeze Detector (Sound Intelligence and CLB) on Oct 28, 2020
Coronavirus has increased interest in detecting symptoms such as fever and...
Fever Tablet Thermal Sensors Examined (Melexis) on Oct 28, 2020
Fever tablet suppliers heavily rely on the accuracy and specs of...
Verkada Fires 3 on Oct 28, 2020
Verkada has fired three employees over an incident where female colleagues...
Eagle Eye Networks Raises $40 Million on Oct 27, 2020
Eagle Eye has raised $40 million aiming to "reinvent video...
Hikvision Q3 2020 Global Revenue Rises, US Revenue Falls on Oct 27, 2020
While Hikvision's global revenue rises driven by domestic recovery, its US...
VICE Investigates Verkada's Harassing "RawVerkadawgz" on Oct 26, 2020
This month, IPVM investigated Verkada's sexism, discrimination, and cultural...
Six Flags' FDA Violating Outdoor Dahua Fever Cameras on Oct 26, 2020
As Six Flags scrambled to reopen parks amid plummeting revenues caused by the...
ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...