200+ US/Mexico Border Camera Towers Request Issued

By: Brian Karas, Published on Jan 30, 2017

Can you design and install a system to detect illegal border crossings, day or night, out to a distance of 7.5 miles?

US Customs and Border Protection has issued an RFI for 200+ "stationary and relocatable" camera towers to be positioned primarily along the U.S./Mexico border.

We examine this RFI, and the feasibility of the requirements in this report.

*** *** ****** *** install * ****** ** detect ******* ****** *********, day ** *****, *** to * ******** ** 7.5 *****?

** ******* *** ****** Protection *** ****** ** RFI *** ***+ "********** *** ***********" ****** towers ** ** ********** primarily ***** *** *.*./****** border.

** ******* **** ***, and *** *********** ** the ************ ** **** report.

[***************]

RFI ********

*** ***, ****** ******* 18th, **** ***** ** ******* *** expand *** ****** ***** Surveillance ****** (****) ********* in ***** ***** ***** of *** *.*. ****** of ****** *** ******.

*********, ***** *** *** existing ******, *** *** CBP ******* ** ****** another ***+ *****, *** vast ******** ***** *** U.S./Mexico ****** (* ***** are ****** *** ********** on *** *.*./****** ******). The ********* ***** ***** the ********* ** ******** and ******** ******:

*** **** ** *** RFI ** ** ******* proposals *** * ****** that *** ******, *****, and ***** ******* ****** crossing ********, *** **** provide ****-**** **** ** human ****** ***** *** border ** ********** ********* people ********** ** ***** the ****** ** ****, or **** ******** ** animals.

********* *** *** ** February ***, ****. ***** is ** **** ***** for **** ****** *********** may *****, ****** *** recent ********* *********** ** the *.*. ********* **** project ** ****** ** be **** ********.

************ ********

** *********** ************ ******** ********* *** ********* for *** ******:

  • **/* *********/*********
  • ******* ** ****** *** track ******* ** * minimum ** * ***** and * ******* ** 7.5 *****, ********* ** environment

  • ***° ********
  • ***** ***** **** ** 5% ** ****
  • ******* ** ***** ******** targets **************
  • ******* ** ****** ******** from ****** ** ******
  • ********** **********/****** ** ***** operators ** *** ****** features, ********, ******, ******* plate ******* ******** ****** the ********* ***** ** the ******
  • *** ******* ** ********** object ********
  • **%+ ******
  • ****** ***** (***** ** other)
  • ****** *********

************, *** ******* ******** need ** ** **** to ** ******** *** operated ** *** ********/************ found ***** *** ********** sections ** *** *.*. border.

Open *******/******** ********** *********

*** *** ** ******* to *** **** ********** and **** *******, ********** specifically:

*** ** ********** ** obtaining *********** ******* ** existing **********-***-***-***** (****) ** non-developmental ********** **** ** part ** ** ********** solution ** ******* *** desired **********. *** ******* to **** ******* *** of ** **** ******* approach *** ******* *** system ** **** ********** Readiness ****** *-*, ************* Readiness ***** *, *** Software ********* ****** *-*. 

*** ********** *** ********* ******* from ****** "******* *****" *******, ***** ********* ** develop * ****** ********** to ************** ****** ******* border *********, ***** ********** failed ***** **** **** $1B *** *****.

******* **** **** **** simply, *** *** ********: 

***** ** ** ****** to ******* *** ********** under **** *******.

Deployment ************

** ******** ** *** technical ************, *********** ****** ** able ** ****** (****** directly, ** *** ***-***********) everything **** ******** * site *** ******* ********* to *** **** *** unpaved *****, ** *****/************, operator ********, *** ******* ***********.

RFI ********

********** ** **** *** the ************ ** **** RFI ****** **** **** products ** *** ** easy ****. *** ****** will **** ** **** on **** **** ** analytics, covering **** ***** ***** with **** * *% false ***** **** **** be ***********, ****** ****** detections *** *** ****** to ** ********** ***** alarms, **** *** *** requirements.

*** ************ *** **** products ********** **** ** the ****-******** ********* ******** that **** ******** ***** to ******, ***** ********* may ** ****** ******* for * ****** ** this *****.

***** ********* ** *******/******* at *+ ***** ** not ************ **** ****** radar, ** ***** ** nearly ********** ** ** with ******* *** *********. The ******* ** *** identifiable ******* ** ******* at ****+ ****** ** also ******** ***** **** products, ************ ** ***** or ** ***-*****.

*******, *** ********** **** likely **** ** ****** a ******-**** ******* ** their ************. ** ***** be **** ********* ** focus ** ******* ******* detection *****, ** **** border ****** *** ** dispatched ** ********* ** person, ** ** ***** get ***** ****** ** observe ******** ******* *** identification ** *******.

Comments (23)

10 Million "W Box" kits should do the trick. When can I get started?

If we scratch the N out of Hikvision...can we use HIKVISIO cameras?

It's interesting you bring that up, I was expecting to see some form of pro-US requests, if not outright requirements, but there was nothing in the RFI about Made in US requirements. That might be because it is an RFI and not and RFP.

Since Mexico is "paying for it" maybe buying American is no longer necessary.

Why is this needed exactly? The wall that was promised should take care of illegal crossings. Make it tall enough, electrify it etc. Should be no problem for Trump. 

I see some old teams forming to milk this box sale until their retirement. Someone should rent a booth at ISC and only have an 'Idea Box' located in the middle of it.

What PTZ can see / track / follow objects in complete darkness at 7 miles? I am genuinely curious.

I speculate that many of the responses will try and include a healthy application of drone-based cameras, though I do not see drones as being able to provide 95% overall operational ability.

That motivated me to google 'drones US border'. Found an interesting NYTimes article, quote:

An audit of the drone program, performed by Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General and released last year, suggested that money spent on the drone program could be used better on ground-based sensors and radar towers than on drones, which cost nearly $20 million each and $12,255 an hour to operate.

Homeland Security began using drones for border security in 2005 along the border with Mexico and added missions on the Canadian border in 2008. Customs and Border Protection operates nine drones, three each out of Arizona, Texas and North Dakota. The drones are the size of a small plane and powered by a turboprop engine capable of speeds of up to 275 miles an hour.

Anyone with direct experience on drones for the border?

$12,255/hr to operate? Did someone not tell them the drones are meant to be rechargeable, not disposable?

I don't think they meant the kind of drones you fly from your cellphone.  They meant the kind that have hardpoints for missiles:

This looks like a more basic evolution of the existing and long running border surveillance program. General Dynamics is contractor for the current version. Its primarily an EO/Radar system but likelihood is integration with a range of ground sensors.

Bear in mind that "military grade" contracts like these have little relationship to commercial security requirements or budgets. As another commenter noted, the IR cameras are high end, very expensive FLIR units. There won't be any thought to saving money with the likes of HIKVision, that's basically irrelevant on something like this.

Some years back on a large industrial site along the coast, one of the bidders introduced this hardware, it looked very convincing at the time. Not sure if anyone actually used it.

https://vumii.com/accuracii-xr/

ground radar detection that launches drones to follow and track objects for more details miles away, it's the only thing that comes to mind that is COTS and even that will probably take some development?

The RVSS upgraded system uses FLIR thermal cameras with ground radar.  I think the FLIR thermal cameras have at least 800 mm lenses, maybe larger.

I have fielded FLIR thermal cameras with 600 mm lenses and you can identify a deer at almost 3 miles.  Remarkable.  Not cheap though.

I am curious as to how they will distinguish between 'legal' and 'illegal' border crossings via a camera. I know it is semantics but lets be very clear on how wording is used. Maybe identify border crossings for followup on with ground patrols.

 

From the RFI, it sounds like a major part of the system is to get coordinates to dispatch Border Patrol, or similar, agents to the location of person detected. They do not need to determine legality with the camera alone.

I would think that people crossing the border without going through one of the standard U.S. Customs-operated entry points would have a very high probability of being illegal.

Truly amazing.  From 1999 until 2005, I worked under the IMC contract to put up and deploy all of these RVSS sites.  I believe Boeing took it over, and it does not look like any progress was made putting new sites in this time.

Deployment strategy for these sites was 20 to 30 of these 80 foot poles per sector, usually 0.5 to 1 mile from border, spaced 1-4 miles apart.  7,15 GHZ analog radios, usually 3-30 mile links.  Digital radios (alcatel, harris), from 180 foot relay towers to sector (i was at Brownsville relay site when 9/11 occurred).  Cabinet on pole can get to 150 f and are many times filled with dirt.  Killer bees, hornets, and bats can use poles as homes.  Border Patrol will not maintain these sites, and in most cases, lenses are filthy.  I believe the contract was probably lost when Ashcroft walked into Yuma control, and found half the thermal cameras  not working.  IMC was blamed, even though govt. selected and bought those cameras, and had an inneffective system in place to repair and replace the cooled thermals.  

9/11 was the worst thing that happened to this project.  Right when it was picking up steam, that tragedy brought it to a screeching halt.  Made no sense.  USA had to develop homeland security agency.  For the next couple of years, the poles to be used lay on the ground and millions in equipment sat in storage.

At the time, we were using 1 inch Hitachi and Long range cosmicar lenses.  Thermal were cooled milcam and isap, with also uncooled lockheed 550.  Control system was Betatech.  Poles and towers mainly by Western Towers from texas.  Square poles and platforms by francis (texas billboard company).  Right before I left, we were testing and comparing several thermal versions, including FLIR.  

I criticized the govt. wanting digital off the shelf technology since there is no way it would operate in these temperatures.  Digital radios to the poles are not practical because of site distances.  Analog radios have 4-8 foot dishes and 1-2watt radios.  From what I read, Boeing was using off the shelf technology.  Spacial Diversity had to be used for digital in most cases.

At the time, battery powered sensors were used that reported back to control.

For the north, fiber used in blaine, and microwave for buffalo and swanton. From those numbers, it does not look like anything added since this 2002-2005 period when those were installed.

The lack of progress since 2005 is mind boggling.  I believe the sell price for each pole with dual pedestal cameras was 300k at the time.  I was an Engineer on the project and was as most northern and southern sites (and climbed many poles and towers).

Jeff, thanks for sharing, very helpful! Given your experience there and what you know about newer technology since than, any specific things or tech you would use there now?

Not really.  Battle hardened analog radios.  The LECAs were each assigned several sites to monitor.  Nothing works as well as a human being assessing.  A billion dollars would buy quite a few labor hours.  Cameras were very effective and the thermal cameras functional to 1-2 miles.  Those were about 70k eack at the time, needing 10k in repairs for the coolers every year.  In most cases, 25 percent on each sector was down at any given time.

The biggest problem with an upgrade to digital would be distance.  Doing a link 80 feet off the ground over hot dessert next to Mexico would be difficult.  I assume, though, that maybe they are using digital radios by now, but all of the other digital equipment would have to be military grade operating up to or over 150 F.  The IMC analog radios would never fail.

You are only as good as night abilities.  As far as i know, there is no HD thermal camera, so little reason for IP.  Analog radios have subcarrier channel for other applications including 2 way radio repeaters and sensor detection.

It is great to see Boeing pocket 1 billion, with little to show for it.  The system design out of innovation by the little guy (Tony K, IMC, Conneticut) is still running strong, and 15 years later, the government is looking to upgrade it.  I wonder if Boeing is taking any credit for that well designed and reliable workhorse.

I worked for Yankee Microwave out of Maine.  The story goes that while doing some radio work down south, they were approached by the border patrol who had a connex full of camera and radio parts, but noone could figure out how to install and make it work.. Yankee installed most if those sites at the top of this discussion 1998-2005.  I joined the party in 2001.

How much of the Boeing contract got held in FCC accreditation?

Facial recognition at 7 miles, at night, with COTS. This is typical government expectations that are designed to fail and simultaneously line a large DOD contractor's pocket.

As a San Diego based integrator, we have stayed away from the craziness and the decisions/expectations being made by non-experts.

They could benefit from some real-world consultation from firms that deal with COTS equipment and then align their expectations accordingly IMHO.

 

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London police, but this time the system was thwarted by technical problems and...
London Live Police Face Recognition Visited on Feb 13, 2020
London police have officially begun using live facial recognition in select areas of the UK capital, sparking significant controversy. IPVM...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
China Subway Facial Recognition System Examined on Jun 24, 2019
A China city of 6+ million people has installed facial recognition-enabled gates in subways, allowing commuters to enter stations by simply showing...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
Hikvision AI Problems Criticized By Chinese Publication on Apr 09, 2019
Hikvision's facial recognition works poorly, causes delays and worsens learning, according to a new investigation by one of China's leading...
Casino Security Consultant Carl Lindgren Interview on Mar 26, 2019
For more than 20 years, Carl Lindgren worked as a casino surveillance pro, while being active (and sometimes outspoken) on various online video...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Viakoo Presents Cyber Hygiene for Cameras on May 28, 2020
Viakoo presented its 'Cyber Hygiene' and 'Service Assurance' products at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System ReTested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to Seek, the first blackbody system we tested and retested it with our...
Directory of 106 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on May 28, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers to help you see and research what options are available. There are...
Fever Cameras Are Medical Devices, Per The FDA, Dahua, Feevr, Hikvision, InVid Contrary Claims Are False on May 28, 2020
Fever cameras are medical devices, despite what euphemisms various sellers use. The US FDA clearly categorizes them as medical devices and...
Wyze Raises $10 Million And Seeks Services Expansion on May 27, 2020
Wyze has raised $10 million, the company's first disclosed raise since the $20 million announced at the beginning of 2019. Inside this note,...
Startup Videoloft Presents Cloud Storage on May 27, 2020
Videoloft presented offsite cloud storage at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from Videoloft including IPVM...
Directory of 300+ Fever Camera News Reports Globally on May 27, 2020
This global directory tracks 300+ articles about thermal cameras used to detect fevers in response to the coronavirus pandemic. Articles are...
Integrators Rising Against Coronavirus on May 27, 2020
IPVM integrator statistics make it clear - Coronavirus's impact on business is lessening and many are anticipating even better news in weeks...
Netposa Stock Surges 46% After US Human Rights Abuse Sanctions on May 27, 2020
Last Friday, the US government announced it would sanction PRC video management provider NetPosa for being "complicit in human rights violations...
LILIN Presents NDAA-Compliant P2 Cameras on May 26, 2020
Merit LILIN presented its NDAA-compliant P2 camera series at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...