No Fraud, No Loss, Not Timely: Carrier Moves to Dismiss Zwirn-Backed Suit
Carrier, GE Security, Interlogix, and UTC have moved to dismiss the Zwirn-backed suit against its alarm panels arguing that the complaint does not prove any fraud or loss plus is untimely.
Inside this note, we examine the 51-page memorandum filed and the arguments that the defendants make.
*****-**** *********** ** ******* *** **** **** prejudice **** * **** *********.
No *****
*****, ******* ** ** ***** **** no ***** *** **** *********:
****** *** *** ********* ******* **** any ********* ********* *** *****, **** any *****************, ** ******** *** ********
**** ***** **** **** ********** ******** that ***** ******** **** ** ********* which **** *** ********* ****** ** factually *** ****:
** ****** ***** * ***** *** fraud ** ****** ** ******** ***** Interlogix ********** ****** **** ** ********* its ******* ** ********* **** ** standards.Whether ** ***** ********* ** ********* is ** ** **—*** ******, *** notsome ******* ***** **** *****...
******’* ********* **** ***** ***** **** his ************ ** **** **’**************** ** its *** *********, *** **** **********’* accurate ************** **** *** ******* **** been ********* ** ********* ** **
*************, *** ********* ***** **** ***** action ******* ** ** **** ****** declare **** ***** ******** *** *** compliant *** **** ** *** ***** done ********* *** ** *** ********* of ******* **** ***** ******** * court ***** **** * ******* ***** that ** ******* **** ***** ******* within **** *****.
********* **** ******* ** **** ***** they ****** **** *** ********** **** it ** ** ** ** ** determine *** ** ***** *** *********, e.g.:
“************* ****** ******* ** ***** ******** to ** *** *********** *** ******* so **** ** *** ************* ********* if *** ******** **** ******** ********* and ************ *** ****, **********, *** casualty *******.”
“** ***** *** ******** ** ** whether * ******* ***** *** ********* so ** ** ******* *** ** label.”
“** ****** *** *** **** ******* of ******* *** ******* ** ******** was *********.”
** ********, ** *** ******** *********, the ********* ****** **** ***** ******** were *** ** *** **** *********:
********** **** ******** ****************** ** *********** that *** ************ *** ** *** NFPA ********* *** ********* *********** ****** burglar *** **** ***** ****** ******* units **** ** **** **** *** not.
** ******* **** **** ** * difficult ***** *** *** *********. **** if **** ******* ***** *** ** to ****** *** ******** (** ***** to **** *** *****), ** ***** still *** **** *** ********** ************** anything ***** **** ********** *********** **** was **'* ******** *** **** *****.
No ****
***** *** ********* ****** *** "*** of ****** ****** *** ********** ***** of *** ***** ******", *** ********* is ********** **** ***** ** ** real ****:
****** *** *** ******* **** ********** caused *** *** ****, *** ***** any “*************” ****.
****** **** ***** ** ********* ****** that *** ***** ** *** ***** was **********, *********** *** ***** ***** manifested *** ******* ******, ***** ****** to ******* ** ********, *** ***** caused *** ** ***** ****** *****.
********** ** ** ** ***** ****, at ****, ***** *** ****** ******** losses, ***** **** ****** *** *** covered ** ********** ***:
****** ** *** ******’* ********-**** ********, under ***** “[***] *** ****** *** tort *******” ****** ** ******** ***** on “************* *** ****** ******** ******.”
**** ********, "******** ******* **** ********** in **** **** *** ********** ** others ******* ** ****** ******** ****",******** *** ***.
***** *** ********* ********* *** *********** of ***** **** **** ******* ******, it ****** *** * ****** ******* of ******* ***** ** **** ***** physically *******.
********
******, *** ********** ***** **** ***** allegations *** ****** *** ******* ** limitations *** ********** ****:
*** *****, ****** **********, *** ****** claims *** **** ******* ** * six-year *********** ******, ***** ***** *** his ****** ** ** ******, *** latest *** *********** ****** ***** **** begun *** ****. *** ********* ** his ****** *** ******* ** * four-year *********** ******, *** ***** *** latest *** *********** ****** ***** **** begun *** ****. *** ****** ********* his ***** ***** ** ****, ***** he ******** ** ****—** ***** ****** filing ***** ******.
*******, *** ********* ****** **** ** only *** ******** ** ***** ******* defects **** ****.
Amended *********?
** ** ******** *** ****** ****** for *** ********* ** **** ** amended *********. ******* *** ********* *** offer **** ******** ****** ** ******** allegations ** *****.
Next ****
*** *********** ** ** ******* ********* aside, *** **** **** ** *** the ***** ** ****** ** **** motion ** ******* ** ********:
*** ********* ** ********** ** ******* . ****** *** for**/*/********** ***** ***** *. **********. ****** otherwise ******** ** *** *****, **** motion **** ** ******* ** *** papers *** ** *********** *** ********.
********* ********* *****, *********** *****:
***** ****** *** *** ********* ****** Zwirn’s ************ **** **’* *********** ** the ** *** **** ********* *** be *********** ****** *** * ** committee **********, ** ** *** *** stuff ** * ********** ***** ******.
** **** ***** ** *** **** few ******, ** ** ****** **** the ***** **** **** ** **** motion ** *******. ** **** ****** then, ***.
********* *** ********* *********** *********'* ****** ** *******. *** arguments *******: