Canon ***** ****** ********
** * ***** ********* a ***** ************** ******** some ************** *** *** imager, key ******* *******:
- **** **********
- ***-* **** (******* ******* an ***-* ****** *** a **** "****-*****")
- **** ***** **** (fps)
- ******** ** **********/**********/************ ************

** ******* **** ******** in ***** ** ******** date, ***** ******** ** other ***** *******, *** specs, ** ***-***** ************.
Technology *** *** *****, ******* *** *** ****
***** ***** **** ******** rights *** ********* ************** of *** ****** ******, a *********** ******* ***** certainly **** ***** *** Axis *****. **** ***** give **** ******** ****** for *** ******* ********** single-imager ******, ********* *** company *** *** ********** been **** ** *****. This ***** **** **** Axis ****** **** ** its ****** ********** **********.
Technical **********
************ **** * **** resolution ****** ***** ****** present * ****** ** challenges. ***-***** ************ ***** ****** certainly ** *******, *** no ****** **** ******** technology *** ****, ********* and ******* ***** ***** be ***********.
*** ************ *** **** be **** *******, *** other ********* **** **** produce **** ********** *******, Avigilon *** *******, **** ******* ****** their ******** ** ***** own ***, ********* ******** that ** ** *** practical *** '**********' ***** to ******** ******* ******** super **** ********** ******* without ********* *** **** experience. ** ******, **** could *** **** ** a ****** ** ******* their *** *** ********, which **** **** **** steadily ********* ** *** market.
Avigilon ******
* ***** **** ****** that ********* * ******* user ********** ***** **** Avigilon's**** '**'****** **** ****** ********** by **********. ****** *** 30MP ****** ****** **** not **** ** * significant ******* ** ********'* sales, ** **** ******* the *********** ** ******** the ******* ** * technology ****** ** ***** of ******-****** **********.
Market ******
***** **** ********** ******* remain * **** ***** market, **** **** ***** resolution (** **********) ** cameras **** *** ***** major ********. ********* ************ for * ***** ****** would ****** ****** **** limited, ****** *** ***** of ************ ***** ** would ** ********** (******* security, ****** ********, ********/******) are ********** **** ****** constrained. ****, *****/**** *** unlikely ** ******* *** market **** * ****** based ** **** ******, but ** ***** **** them ******** ********** ** technology ******* **** ******.
Comments (41)
Undisclosed #1
That would make the most sense. But why are you so sure?
I realize that the Canon security line is now sold and supported by Axis, but has there been a statement made that CS will no longer produce any new products?
And Canon has often confounded those who assume that they will use their multiple security holdings to their best use.
Again, I do agree that they should do it, but will they?
Create New Topic
Steve Beck
This one camera would replace 10,554 analog cameras right?
Create New Topic
Jordi Ibero
01/18/17 09:01am
And what about the lens? I don't know if any actual lens can achieve this optical resolution... INSANE!
Create New Topic
Claudio Almeida
Theoretically, this camera would occupy the same bandwidth of 250 1 Megapixel cameras that would be arranged in a more clever and better distribution than just pointing to one same local.
When I tested my first video capture card, in 1997, it had only 1 fps and QCIF resolution. At that time, it had much better quality than a time lapse recorded image. Telephone line modems supported only a 56 Kbps bandwidth, but enough to transmit that images.
Today we would laugh from that; we have much better resolutions and bandwidth.
But we still don't have a bandwidth large enough to support several 250 Megapixels cameras. Certainly the day we will laugh of 10 megapixels cameras and 10 Mbps bandwidth will come.
Until there, except for a very few applications, it's a camera for the future, not for today.
Canon made a very fast car but too big to fit in our current highways.
I agree with you, Brian: This is more to put their flag in the top of the highest resolution mountain.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #4
How much floor space do I need in my data center to process and analyze video from each camera?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #5
While I am sure there is a 250MP imager security camera in our future, I think the low frame rate (<5), bandwidth, storage and lens and probably lighting requirements may limit practical applications of it to a few niches.
Like others have pointed out, there aren't too many applications where this can replace 250 1 MP cameras. Still I would be curious to see if it could perform in the real world or is it just a bragging rights technology.
Create New Topic
Jordi Ibero
01/23/17 02:30pm
There's no direct relation. The motion blur is about long exposure time. If you are going to 1fps but your exposure is about 1/60 or 1/100, your image will be detailed and not blurred (asuming you are not monitoring cars (you will need to go shorter in the expopsure time)
Recording is the most importat part in a CCTV system. Is where you have the evidence. The 30/25 fps were important in the analog age, whit limited resolutions viewing small areas. In the megapixel age, fps are not so important because your monitored area is bigger. In fact, they are a waste of disk space. Only some applications as casinos (i.e.) may need real time movement. But then, record this stream too!
This is my opinion :)
Create New Topic
Jordi Ibero
01/23/17 04:14pm
I don't have to give any SS!!! Maybe Avigilon... :)
Create New Topic