Camera Innovation is Amazing

By: John Honovich, Published on May 04, 2016

The innovation in the video surveillance camera market has never been higher or faster.

While there is much negativity about the race to the bottom, including from IPVM, it is important to appreciate this important distinction.

Not * *********

**** ** ******** ****** say **** ******* **** or *** ******** * commodity. **** ** *****.

*********** *** ****** **** are ****** *** ***** minimal *********** ** *************** is ********.

Amazing ********** ********

** ** ********* ** remember *** *** *** industry *** **** ** the **** * ***** and ** *** ******* down.

* ***** ***:

  • **** *** *** **** limited *** *********. ***'* believe **? ***** ****** ******** ****. *** **** ******* in **** **** *** now ******** *****. ******* to *** **** ********* ****** ********.
  • *** ***** *********** *** very ****. ***, ************ color ******* ***** ** (see:*** ***** *** ***** Shootout).
  • ********** ** *** ****. Now, ****** ***** ************* offer ********** ** ********.
  • ********* *********** *** *** far ******.***** ********** *** **** ********.
  • ****** *** ****. ***, analog ****** **** **** ***** **** ****** ********** cameras.
  • ***** ****** **** ****** (e.g., *** ******** **** ****). *****, *** ********* and *************, ***** ********* works ****.

**** ****** ***** *******, much ***** ********* ***********, much ******* **** ** integration. ******* *** ***, far ****** **** **** were **** * ***** ago.

Last **** ********

**** ** *** ****** it **** ** **** the **** ****, ***** have **** *********** ******** in ***** *** ***** performance, **** ***** ***** in ********* *********** (***** codecs), *** ***** ************ of ** / **** cameras.

** *** **** ******* great **** *** ****** innovation.

The ***** *******

***********, *** ******** *** a *******. ******* *** these ***********, * ****** of *** ****** ******* manufacturers *** ***** ********** in ******** ****** ** hard *** ******* ** possible.

*** ***** ****** *** great *** ********* *** can ** **** *** an ********, ** **** as **** *** ***********.

*************, **** ** ***. The ******* **********'* ******* spending ** ******* **** their ************** / ******** spending *** ******* * bubble, ************* *** ************, *********** **** ** *************** low ******. ******* **** with *** **** ****** struggles ** *** ******* economy, ******* *** ******* players ** ***** **** prices **** ******* ** stay ***** *** *** have *****'* *********.

*** ***** *** **** this **** ** **. Eventually, ****** ** **** correct ******, *********.

*** ***'* *** ******* / ****** **** *** innovation ** ************ ******* has *** ********* ** be ***** ****. ** the **** *****, **** a ****** *** ***** perspective, ** ****** ** excited ***** *** **** better *** ********** ** today.

Comments (14)

Most would believe that innovative and commodity products always exist in the same space. There certainly is innovation in the camera industry, and there are always people looking to pay for those innovations. But commoditization is about how the majority market view the products and the industry.

Therefore it comes down to whether customers see a distinction and value in the product advancements being delivered. If they do, then the market stretches beyond the base commodity level and customers willingly pay the premium. If they don't, because of cost or easy of use, then it remains a niche in the space until a time where is it either rendered obsolete because the market moves in a different direction, or eventually gets swallowed up in the commodity side of the business as a value-add.

For the camera industry, a good example of the commodity argument is small commercial applications. If consumers think it is sufficient to buy a residential camera system off the shelf at a big box, then innovations aren't really part of the conversation. Add in low cost manufacturers for the large commercial market pitching a comparable solution, and the innovations started having a real battle.

It reminds me of when I worked in the telco/ISP world when the phone and cable companies started competing using IP. The phone companies wanted to keep charging commercial pricing to small business customers, and those customers began to wonder why they had to pay so much more for what they perceived to be the same as what they got at home. Right or wrong, no technology argument was going to move these customers because in their eyes the question wasn't whether or not to have the latest features or reliability. What they experience at home was "good enough" for them at work, so that was all they needed to know.

Much like this example, the line is being re-drawn in the camera space between value (commodity) offerings and premium (innovate) ones, and the consumers for each are no longer just residential vs. commercial or SMB vs. corporation. The real question is where the line between markets is going to be re-drawn and how much of the market sits on each side.

Therefore it comes down to whether customers see a distinction and value in the product advancements being delivered.

Customers see a distinction and value in new technology like better low light, better WDR, lower bandwidth, etc.

It is the suppliers who are immediately cutting prices even for new technology, so that customers need not pay more.

I do agree there exists 'innovations' that customers simply will not pay - advancements that make little to no practical difference but that's not the case.

Here, I am drawing the distinction that it is the suppliers who are unnecessarily, and somewhat destructively immediately cutting prices on innovations that people would pay for.

Here, I am drawing the distinction that it is the suppliers who are unnecessarily, and somewhat destructively immediately cutting prices on innovations that people would pay for.

If there were only a limited number of players in the market, I would agree. But the camera market is so saturated that there are companies looking for any angle to take share. This competition comes in part because of the exponential hardware improvements throughout the tech landscape, driving down prices fast and allowing almost anyone a chance to get in on the market. Add in the fact that so many things have camera embedded into them, and now you have multiple, previously divergent, marketplaces innovating on the same type of product.

As someone who does not work in the camera space, what I see in this market is very similar to smart phones. There were great advances for years, and there continue to be today. But very quickly, prices dropped and the improvements from model to model "seemed" less revolutionary to the user. That is in part because the hardware is only as good as what the user does with it. That means that until software platforms can turn these innovations into something that advances the user experience in a significant way, the consumer will be less buying for "want" and instead only buy for "need." And that change in mindset is the epitome of commodity.

I would also add that the recent conversations on IPVM regarding selling direct is another example of a commodity market. When the product alone cannot protect a company's market share, then they start looking for alternate ways to protect their margins. And when the consumer isn't willing to pay for the value of those involved in the middle, then it becomes a quick run towards direct to consumer sales.

Despite all these innovations, a number of the larger Chinese manufacturers are hyper aggressive in dropping prices as hard and quickly as possible.

I think it's impossible to seperate the innovation from the race to the bottom, as innovation requires adoption in addition to invention, and adoption is tied directly to the cost of the innovation.

For instance, in the case of true WDR, the innovation is more than the technology involved in creating the image, it's also the processes/technology that was created to manufacturer true WDR cheaper.

If Axis had its way it might still be high-end/niche and therefore less innovative.

Surely the massive Chinese government orders have created the economies of scale that have made these things more affordable to a great number of buyers everywhere, no?

Surely the massive Chinese government orders have created the economies of scale that have made these things more affordable to a great number of buyers everywhere, no?

There are 2 big drivers for cameras over the past decade. Certainly, the Chinese government is one and likely we agree that the Chinese government has reduced prices overall, both by scale and their willingness to subsidize their major companies.

The other driver is the rise of consumer cameras (whether it is cameras on phones or action cameras like GoPro). For something like Ambarella (American company) who has been so key to the development of higher resolution, low light image processing, smart codecs, etc., they have been more driven by the consumer side (like GoPro, for good and now bad) than the Chinese government.

IP camera is running computers; product development is software programming work. It’s labor intensive, not capital intensive. We are short on labor resource here, so you see the Chinese advance, they have more engineers work on RD.

Did I just read a positive story about the state of the industry? !

But seriously, reading this cheered me up a little. I've been somewhat down on the industry of late.

Who do you think is innovating?

China/Tawain/Korea or the rest?

The American chip company Ambarella is certainly one. The sensor companies as well.

Axis was first with super low light (LightFinder), first with smart codecs (Zipstream), first with many different form factors, etc.

And Hikvision has some and is a fast follower and super aggressive at dropping prices.

But, from your implication that it is China/Taiwan/Korea that is innovating and not the rest of the world, is inaccurate. To be clear, when I say innovating, I mean first for new functionalities, dropping prices is disruptive but not in the sense innovation is typically used.

On the other hand, being owned by the Chinese government could be considered an innovation....

To be clear, when I say innovating, I mean first for new functionalities, dropping prices is disruptive but in the sense innovation is typically used.

Yes, but as you once patiently explained to me

Invention is different than innovation. Innovation is when there is actually a major market impact, which [Canon's] financial results and overall production position shows that there has been little of.

So should we consider the first camera manufacturer ever with True WDR the innovator? Or the first one to be able to make it viable for the masses?

Certainly Avigilon has had > 29MP cameras for some time, so should we gush over 8MP resolution today? (Or maybe just that the frame rate is better.)

That's why, in my list above, resolution is conspicuously absent. I do not consider the jump in resolution to be as significant as the other items listed.

As for WDR, there are multiple innovations, the 'first' one (something like Pixim), and then other sensors developed for HD cameras, etc. True WDR is more widely available because sensor and chip manufacturers have innovative, true WDR is being sold for as little as $100 or $200 because of the price wars.

You did mention it here

Even if you narrow it down to just the last year, there have been significant advances in super low light performance, plus sharp drops in bandwidth consumption (smart codecs), and broad availability of 4K / 12MP cameras.

In any event my question about "who do you think is innovating" was not loaded, I see both sides of the inventor vs. popularizer argument.

Cheap cameras today are about as good as expensive cameras used to be, and expensive cameras today are capable of things that would have been science fiction a few years ago. Take it from a guy who started out installing VCRs and multiplexors- this is an amazing time to be in this industry.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,367 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's...
Strong ISC West 2019 For Manufacturers But Concerns For 2020 March Move on Apr 16, 2019
ISC West 2019 was strong for manufacturers, according to new IPVM survey results of 100+ manufacturers, consistent with 2018 results. However,...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 -, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...
Axis: "No One Wants To Buy A Camera" on Nov 09, 2018
Axis has, in its own description, made a bold declaration: The industry is changing so rapidly that the following statement might seem bold but...
Axis Z-Wave IP Camera Tested Poorly on Mar 20, 2018
Z-Wave is drawing notable interest for video surveillance use. In IPVM's initial coverage, 84% expressed interest in it, with nearly half being...
Deep Learning Surveillance Startups Deep Problem on Jun 23, 2017
The undeniably good news for the video surveillance market is that we are seeing the rise of more startups than in many years. The cause of this...
How Integrators Use IPVM on May 24, 2017
150 integrators explained how they use IPVM and how it helps them stay informed and improve their business.  The 4 main uses integrators cited for...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2017 on Jan 11, 2017
ONVIF has been one of the most debated aspects of the video surveillance industry. On the one hand, its aim to increase interoperability has been...
Top Surprises in the Video Surveillance Industry 2016 on Nov 29, 2016
The top 3 surprises of 2016 for integrators surveyed by IPVM were: The race to bottom, repeating 2015's Top Surprise Result New -...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...