Calculating Video Surveillance Storage / Bandwidth

By: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 29, 2016

Calculating surveillance bandwidth is complex, and inexperienced users can easily underestimate bandwidth, leading to reduced storage durations and/or overloaded networks.

The most common way technicians estimate storage is to use manufacturer or third party calculator tools. However, these tools are too simple for the complex factors impacting bandwidth / storage, a fundamental flaw which fails to reflect real world conditions. In this tutorial, we explain these key issues and give our recommendations for how to most accurately calculate surveillance storage needed.

Most Use Calculators, Despite Issues

Despite their high potential for inaccuracy, most people use calculators. They are simple to use for even novices, typically asking only for a few basics such as number of cameras, resolution, frame rate, with an estimate immediately generated.

From an IPVM member survey, here is the breakdown on preferred method, with a strong majority using storage calculators:

However, it is nearly impossible for calculators to reflect the wide range of conditions in which cameras are installed, as well as the variances between camera models. For example, we asked users how much bandwidth a 1080p H.264 camera uses. Notice how widely bandwidth estimates vary, even using the same resolution, framerate, and CODEC:

All of the respondents could be 'right' even though the answers vary by more than 300%. Differences in cameras used and sites deployed can easily result in massive differences in actual bandwidth/storage consumed. Calculators do not reflect them.

Most ******** ******

** ********** ********* *********/*******, there *** ***** *** recommendations:

  • **** ******* *** ****** bandwidth ** ******* ******
  • ****** ***** ********** *** each ******** ****** ****
  • ********** *** *** ****** settings ****** *********/******* ***********

***** ***** ****** *** critical ** ****** ********** and **** **** ***** spot ******** ******** ** calculations.

*** *******, * ********** may ******** * **/* for * ***** *****, but ***** ** **** history *** ********* ** specific ****** ***********, ******* is **** ****** ** be * **/*, * 100% ********.

Testing *******

******* ** ****, ** is ******** ** ***** the ********* *********** ** each ****** ***** *** use ** ****** ******* from ****** ** *******, such **:

  • ********:***** ****
  • ******: ***** *******
  • ******:**** *** *****/********* ****
  • *******:******* ***
  • **** *******:**** ************

****** *** ******* *** each ** ***** ********** levels,*** ***** *****, *** * ****** shot **** *** ******(*). These *** ** ****** referred ** ***** ** a ******** ** ************ and *********** *** **** reference *** **********. ** sure ** **** ******* note ** *** **** the ********* ****** ** plunges (******** ***** ** day, ******* ********, ***.) and ****** ******** ******** as *********.

*** ***** ***** ***** the ****** ** *** to ********** *** ******* ********* consumption, shown ** *** *****.

Recording **********

**** ******* ** ******** camera installations, ** ********* ******** scene ********** ** **** camera ******** ** ********. Take * *** ******* to ******* ******* ******, moving *******, ******** ** lack *******, *** ***** scene ******* ***** *** impact *********.

***** ******* *** *****, record *** ******'* ******** view *** ********** ***** and **** * ***** for *********. **** *** be ** ****** ** the ***** *****:

***** **** ***** ** created, *** *** ******* it ** ****** ********* from ****** ******. ********* from ****** ******* *** be ****** ******** ** photos ***** **** *** proposed ***** *** **** accurate **********.

Further *********** *************

******* ************ ************, ***** are **** ******* ***** may ***** ****** ** extreme ********* ** ********. 

  • ****** ***** ***********
  • ************/***********
  • ***** ******
  • ****** *********/********* ******
  • ***** **** / *** light

Camera ***** ***********

** *** ****** ******* you **** ****** ********* for *** ****** **** you *** ***** ***** findings ** ****** ** the **** ********** *** framerate. **** ** *** same ************'* ****. ********* camera ******, **** **** the **** ************ *** produce **** ********* *** rates.

*** *******, *** ********* image ***** *** *******, an **** ***** *** Axis *****, **** ****, 30 ***, *** ** a ~**' ********** ***, at *********** ** ~***. Despite ***** ******* ***** standardized, ** **** **** lit ****** *****, *** Q1604's ******* *** *** Kb/s ***** *** ***** consumed *.** **/*, ****** 3x *** *********.

**************: **** * **** Variety ** *******

*********** **** ************ ** manufacturer *** **** **** extreme **** ******** *****. ******* of ****, ** ** critical ** ***** *** bandwidth *********** ** **** camera ***** *** ***. 

************/***********

**** ** *** ** the **** ***** ****** are ****, ***** *.*** and *** **** **********, compression ****** *** **** significantly, ******* ******** *********** in ********* ***********.

*******, ************* ******* ** vastly ********* *********** ****** (*** ***** ****** ************ *********** Comparison), **** ** ***************, making ************ ***** ** **** one ***** **********.

**************: *********** ***********

***** ** ***** ****** *******, **-** ************ ** approximately *** "***** ****" between ***** ******* *** bandwidth. ****** ****** **** significant ******** ****** ** image *******, ***** ***** levels ******** ********* **** little **** ** ********* image *******. ************* ******* at **** ***** ****** for **** ************ ******* compared ** ************ ********.

*** *** ***** ***** *************** *********** ********** *** **** *******.

Smart ******

** *** ****, ******* almost ****** **** ***** ******** for ***********, *-***** ********, and *********, ****** ************ simpler. *** **** *** introduction ******* ****** ** *** **** *** years, ******* *** *** dynamically ****** ***** ******** depending ** **** ** in *** *****. ***** are ***** **** ********** used ** ***** ****** (though *** *** *** *** three):

  • ******* ***********:******* ** ******** *** same *********** ***** ** the ****** ***** ** view, ***** ****** *** increase *********** ** ******/********** objects *** ****** ** on ******/********** *******, ******** bandwidth *******.
  • ******* *-***** ********:***** *.*** ******* ********* use * ***** *-***** interval (*.*. * ****** ** 30 ******), ***** ****** increase *** ******** ******* I-frames **** ***** ** no ****** ** *** stream, *** *********** ******** when ******** ******. **** technique ******* ******** ************* due ** *** **** smaller **** ** *-******.
  • ******* ***:*******, **** ***** ****** reduce ********* **** ***** is ** ****** ** the *****, **** ** a ******* ** * FPS ** * ********** set ** *** ****.

***** *** ** **** of ***** **********, ******* savings ** ** ** 95% **** **** **** in **** *****. ** a *******, ******* *********** reduced ******** ** **-**% in **** **** **** scenes.

**************: **** ***** ****** In *****/************ *********

*************, ******* *** * given ***** ***** *** perform ** * ***** scene ** *************. **** small ******* ** ******, such ** ******* ** foliage, *** **** ** enough ******** ** ******* dynamic *-*****/*** ******** **** functioning. ** * ******, the **** **** ******** is ** **** *** camera/Smart ***** ** ***** in *** ***** ** is ******** ***.

******* ****, ** ********* reducing ***** ***** ******** by **** * ******* amount (*-**%) ** ******* underestimation *** ********** *********** of *******.

*** *** ***** ***** ***** *** **** ******* ** these *** ****** *** related ******.

Video ****** *********/********* ***********

***************/***-********** ***** ****** ********* and ********* *** ** one ** *** ******* sources ** ********** ******* calculations. For ********, ** *** are ********** ******* ** 'real' ****** ** * server ****, ** ** likely ** ** **** low - **** **** 5%. *******, ******** ****, screensavers, ***********, ***. *** make ****** ********* ****** nearly ************, ****** ***** results **** ***** **** estimations.

**************: ********/**-******** 

***** ****** ** ******** to ******** *** ***/** video ********* *********. ** a *******, ******** *** optimization ****** ** ********* about * **** ***** installation, **** **** ******* benchmarks *** *********/******* *** be **** *** ************.

*******, ******* ** ******, landscaping, ****** ************, ***., may **** **** ******* storage ********* **********. ***** should ************ ***** ***** configurations (~**-** **** ** as ***** ******* *** made) *** ****** ** needed.

*** ********** ****** ***** ********* *** **** ******* ** this *******.

Night **** / *** ***** ********* ***********

********** **** *****, ** low ***** / ***** time, ********* ***** ** be ******, ********* *** higher (*.*., *** ** high). ***** ** ** easy / ****** *** to ******** **** ** a ****** ** ******* come **** ****:

  • ****** ** ******* *****:** * ***** **** of *****, *** **** noise *** *** *** on *** *****, *** higher **** *********, ****** this *** ** ****** with **** *** **********. 
  • ********** **:** *** *****, ******* with ********** ** **** to ******* **** ********* than ** *** *** but ************* **** **** non-IR *******. *******, **** is ***** ******** ** the ******* *** ***** of ********** ** *** the ********** ** *** scene.
  • ****** *** ***** ***********:**** *******, ******* *** to ****** *** ***** image ********** ** ******* of ****** ******* ** lower * **** ******, will ******* ************* **** bandwidth ** *****.

*** ******* ********* ** *** Light *** ******* *** ***** ** Image ******* *** **** *******.

**************: *** *** / VBR **** * ***

** ***** ** ****** ******* nighttime *********, ** ********* users *** ******** ** night. **** **** **** are *** **** ***** than ******** ******** ** night, ********* ***** ******* is **** *******, ** the **** ****** ** digital ***** *** ****** images ****** ** *** suffer **** ********* ** compression *** *** **** light ****** **.

*** *** **** ******** ********* ** ***** is **** *** ******** *** *** recommendations.

Storage ********** ********

****/**** ****** *** *** manufacturers offer * *********/******* ********** tailored ** ***** ********. The ***** ******** ** these *********** ****, **** differing ****** ** ********** and *************. ***** ****** ******** which *** ****** ********* online (** ***** ******** as ** ****) *** discussed *****:

Supercircuits ****

** * *** ****** search ******, ************* ********* ****** ***** ***** *** is ***** **********, **** limited ****** / **********:

** *** *** **** is ********* **** ***** and *** *** ******** with *******, **** ** ok. *** *** ********** fails ** ******** *********** in ****** ******, ******, activity ******, ** **** a ***. ****, ** assumes * ****** ************ between ***** **** *** bandwidth (*.*., ****** *** frame, ****** *** *********) despite **** ********* *** being *** **** ** practice (*.*., ******* ********* ** ***** Rate).

**** ****** ****

*** **** ****** **** [**** no ****** *********] ** **** sophisticated, **** ***** ** options *** ****, **********, and ***** ********* *******, video ******** ** ******** scenes *** ***********/***** ********, and ****. *******, ** allows ****** ********** ** ******** settings, ** ***** *** better ****** ** ** fit ***** **** ***** testing. *** ******** ******** **** Axis ******* *** ******** compression ****** *** ******, highlighted ** *** ***** below:

** **********, **** ****** picking **** ****** (****** scenarios) **** ****** ********* bandwidth *********** ***********, *.*., the ******* '*******' ******** more ********* **** *** 'stairwell', ***** ** ********* with ***. *** ***** below ***** *** ******* and ****** ****** **** provide:

*******, **** ** **** tool, *** ****** ** scenarios **** ********** *** reflect ***'* ********. *** example, ***** '************' ******** has **** ****** ******* in ** *** * lot ** ***** ********** resulting ** ********* **** than *** ********* ********:

'****' ************ *** ** similar *** ** ** is ******, *** ********* will ** *** ****** (double, ******, ********* ***** possible). **** **** *** make **** **** '*****' but ** ******** *** fundamental ********** ** ********** bandwidth **********.

****, **** ********* ******* low ***** ** *** low *****, *******, **** assumptions *** ********** *** do *** ****** **** cameras **** ********** ** will ****** ****** ******* far **** ********* **** those ******* ** ** low *****. *** ******* below ***** *** ** Axis ***-** *** ** models ****** *** **** bandwidth ** *** *****:

******, ** *** ***************, Axis **** ********* ******* *** same ********* *** *** cameras ** *** **** resolution / ********, *** factoring ** ********* ** different ****** ****** ** use ** ******* (***** in *** *******, ** we **** ***** *****, have ** ****** ** bandwidth).

***** ************* **********

*****'* ************* **********, **** **** *** implementations ****** *** ********* various ****** ************'* ******. The **** ******* ** that *** *** ***** which ****** *** *********, pick ***** ****** *** it **** ************* **** in **** *****'* *** bandwidth, *.*.:

*******, *** ***** ***** is **** *** ********* bandwidth ** ********* **** in ********, *.*., **** of ***** *** / 15fps ******* *** ********* at *.***/*. **** ******* smart ******, **** ** atypical ** ********, ****** for ****** ******* **** complexity ****** ** *** compression **************.

** ** ********* ** note **** **** *********** for ******* / ****** providers ****** *** ****** than ******* ******, ***** is ********* **** ** a ****** ******* ** stop ****** **** ********* to ******* *** ******* specifications. *** *******, ***:****** ********** ***** ******* Calculation  

******* 

** *** **** ***** getting **** ********* / storage ************ *******, *** out *** ****** ****** you **** ** *** locations *** **** ** use ****. ***** **** may **** * ****** of *****, *** *** project **** *********** ****** of ******* (*.*., **** than * *** **** drives), *** **** ****** save ******** **** *** future ******** ** ********** yourself ****** **** ********* on *********** **** ****** come ***** ** ***** / ********** ******** ***'* combination ** ******* / scenes.

Comments (7)

FYI... Axis has a newer tool called Site Designer that actually has unique setups for their newer cams etc. that are not well represented in the tool described above.

For example...the Zipstream cams are there and you can play with the settings for that to see the bitrate changes.  Be sure to change the Motion amount as you change the zip effort settings because more motion negates Zip savings.  One still must plan for a Max BW in your server selection but the 'potential' storage savings are there depending on the scene and motion combo.

http://sitedesigner.axis.com is the place.

If you register it will even keep a project in history for you.

What I like... the 'scene selections' are very good and represent what is discussed in this article.

Mike, thanks, we'll do examine it and update on that.

For others to see, here are some of the things Mike referred to:

Avigilon System Design Tool. Give it a chance!

There  are so many other variables other than just scene complexity and megapixel output of the individual camera behaviors.  Storage: 45 days versus 2 years, 75 cameras versus 400. Dual retention of a single camera - Stream A 90 days @ 2mp, Stream B 730 days @ 720p times 400 cameras. Audio, pushed video and insufficient lighting are also culprits we all love.

I had to build my own calculator in excel, the constraints and trade offs were found while applying a percentage of storage overhead so the we don't over crowd the frying pan and blow the circuit breaker. I have loading many other camera calculators to see how they scale with mine and different calculators are all over the map. So yes cameras are all unique, find your baseline and thresholds before pulling the trigger.

Great article and comments, all!  There are many studies on scene types and object behavior that contribute to increased bitrate; some of the biggest contributors cited in these studies, one of which I'll give the link for, are listed below:

Are the objects in the scene moving in random directions?

Are there abrupt changes of motion, light or even network availability?

Are there big differences in motion paths and object sizes that require detection or visual acuity in the scene?

Finally, are there abrupt changes to network requests of the device (especially important consideration if you require faster on-board processors).

Finally, one of the areas that might be unrelated, but can be important was actually covered in a previous IPVM article on camera power-up times to when it is streaming.

Here's a pretty technical study, but it does contain a list of complex video scene use cases (table 1 page 6):

https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/13540868/IJPCC2016_authorfootnote.pdf

A great article.

Good example of exacqVision's configuration calculator and Axis Design Tools.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,528 reports, 880 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Mobile Access Control Usage Statistics 2020 on Sep 21, 2020
Most smartphones can be used as access control credentials, but how...
Door Fundamentals For Access Control Guide on Aug 24, 2020
Doors vary greatly in how difficult and costly it is to add electronic access...
Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now,...
Coronavirus Hits Manufacturers, Standing Now, Worse To Come on Apr 06, 2020
Coronavirus is hitting security manufacturers, though overall modestly for...
Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 27, 2020
Remotely accessing surveillance systems is key in 2020, with more and more...
Keypads For Access Control Tutorial on Jul 28, 2020
Keypad readers present huge risks to even the best access systems. If...
Beware Rigged China Fever Cameras on Sep 08, 2020
Many China fever camera manufacturers have rigged algorithms dynamically...
Free Online NFPA, IBC, and ADA Codes and Standards 2020 on Sep 03, 2020
Finding applicable codes for security work can be a costly task, with printed...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
Forced Door Alarms For Access Control Tutorial on Aug 17, 2020
One of the most important access control alarms is also often ignored....
Use Access Control Logs To Constrain Coronavirus on Apr 09, 2020
Access control users have included capabilities that are not commonly used...
Quantum Dots Potential for Surveillance Cameras Explained on Sep 08, 2020
Quantum dots are starting to be used in TVs for better images, but how will...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
Milestone Presents XProtect On AWS on May 04, 2020
Milestone presented its XProtect on AWS offering at the April 2020 IPVM New...
The Problem With Fever Detecting Thermal Sunglasses on Apr 15, 2020
While the media has promoted using thermal sunglasses to detect fevers, this...

Recent Reports

Mobile Access Control Usage Statistics 2020 on Sep 21, 2020
Most smartphones can be used as access control credentials, but how...
Axis Compares Fever Camera Sellers to 9/11 on Sep 18, 2020
Axis Communications, the West's largest surveillance camera manufacturer, has...
Chilean Official Investigated for Motorola And Hikvision Contracts on Sep 17, 2020
A corruption investigation is underway in Chile after a crime prevention...
Huawei HiSilicon Production Shut Down on Sep 17, 2020
Huawei HiSilicon chips are no longer being manufactured or supplied to...
Virtual ISC West and GSX+ Exhibiting Contrasted on Sep 17, 2020
Both ISC West and ASIS GSX are going virtual this year, just weeks apart, but...
X.Labs Sues FLIR on Sep 16, 2020
X.Labs, the maker of Feevr, has sued FLIR, the publicly traded thermal...
Video Surveillance 101 September Course - Last Chance on Sep 16, 2020
Today is the last chance to sign up for the Fall Video Surveillance 101...
No Blackbody Mistake, Half Million Dollar, Hikvision Fever Camera System in Georgia on Sep 16, 2020
A Georgia school district touted buying Hikvision fever screening "about...
Costar Technologies / Arecont H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 16, 2020
Costar's financial results have been hit by the coronavirus with the company...
Startup Cawamo Presents Live Alerts With Edge AI and Cloud VMS on Sep 15, 2020
Cawamo, an Israeli edge-to-cloud analytics and VMS startup, presented its...
Favorite Access Control Credentials 2020 on Sep 15, 2020
Credential choice is more debated than ever, with hacking risk for 125kHz and...
Dangerous Hikvision Fever Screening Marketing In Africa on Sep 15, 2020
A multi-national African Hikvision distributor is marketing dangerously...
New Products Show Fall 2020 Announced - Register Now on Sep 14, 2020
IPVM's sixth online show will feature New Products from over 25...
Hanwha 8K / 33MP Camera Tested on Sep 14, 2020
Hanwha Techwin has released an 8K / 33MP resolution camera, the TNB-9000 with...