BCDVideo Company Profile 2016

By: John Honovich, Published on May 03, 2016

BCDVideo claims better value and servers specifically selected for video surveillance, an improved experience versus working with a server manufacturer or an IT distributor.

We spoke with BCDVideo to get details behind these claims, and explore their value proposition in this report.

************** ****** ***** *** ******* ************ selected *** ***** ************, an ******** ********** ****** working **** * ****** manufacturer ** ** ** distributor.

** ***** **** ******** to *** ******* ****** these ******, *** ******* their value *********** ** **** report.

[***************]

Favorite ********** ****** *********

** *** **** **** because ******** *** *, surprising ** **, ****** showing ** *** ********** ******** ***** ******* / Servers **** *******.

BCDVideo ******* **********

******** **** ** **** set *** ** ****** a **** ** *&* backoffice *** ******** ***********, testing *** ********** ********* server ********* ** ***** proven **************.  

*** ******* *** ********** been * ******** ** IT ********* *** ********.  In **** ********** ** BCD noticed **** ** ******* were ********** ** **********, but *********** **** ********** to **** ****** ******** with ******** **************.  *** felt **** ***** ******** their ************* **** ********* like **, *** **-***** tech *********, ** ****** solutions ***** ** *** needs ** ******** ***********.  

Server ********

****** ********* ***** **** the ***** ******, ***** ** *******/****** systems ** *** ****-*** ***** **** ******, ********** ** **********-***** servers ** ******* ***+ cameras.

******** **** *** **** the **** **** *** standard ** ********,  ******** to **** ****** ***** hardware ********* **** **** and ********** ***** *** way, *** ******* ** ****** the *********** *** *********** they ****** ** ***** their ******** **. ******, BCDVideo's ******** ** **** it ******** ** ******** HP ******** **** **** rather **** ****** **** HP. 

No ****** ***** *** *************

**** ** ********'* ******** offerings ** ******** ************* settings *** *********** ** the *******, ** *********** ********** could ***** ** ***** clone ** * ******** server. ******** **** ***** specialty ** **** ***** accumulated *********, ******* ******* with ********** ************, *** taking *** **** ** do ***** *** *********** comparison *****, ***** **** competitive *******.

*******, **** *** ******** are ****** *** ********* on ******** **** ********* disk ***** ***** ** network ********** ** **** requirements **** *** **** specific ** ***/*** *********** vs. ******** ** ***.  

** ******* ***** *** selection ** ******** **** controllers ***** ** *********** tests ******** ********* **** they ***** ****** * large ********* ** ***** performance ******* **'* ******* controller *** ** *********** controller ******.

******** **** ********* ************* with *** ********* ** understand ***** ******* *** ******* performance.  **** ******, *** example, *** *********** ** disk */* ******* ********* and *******, ***** ******* performance *** ******** ******* *** server ************* ***** ******** roles, *** ********* *********** was improved ** *** **** performance *********.

******** ****** ***-***** ******* to help *********** ****** *********** hardware ** **** **** design ********** ** * particular ***. 

Product ******* *** ***** ***********

******** ****** **** **** the ****** ****** *********** will **** *** ** servers *** ************ (******* grey-market *********).  

** ***** ******** *** a ***** ***** ** a ****** ** ***** "******" ****, ***** **** position ** ***** ********** enterprise ****** ****.  ** selected * **** ******, one ** *** ***** of *** ******.

****** ***** ****:

  • ** *** ******
  • **-****** *********
  • **** ***
  • (*) *** **** ******
  • **** ***** ********
  • ****** **** **
  • * **** *** ********

****** *** ***** *** this ****** *** ~$**,*** (at ******* ****** ********).  

*** **** ** ******** configuration **** ****** ***** was $**,***, **** ******** discounts *******. * ********** **** ****** was $15,000.  *** **** ***** is ******** ****** *****, meaning **** ** ********** who **** ******** ****** with **** ***** ****** get * ********** ***** that ****** ** ****** to ********'* ***** *** the ** ******.

* ***** ****-****** *****-****** workstation **** *** ***/*** HDD *** ** **** processor *** ****** ** $1,200.  * ********** **** system **** ****** ** $1,200.

** ************ **** ********, they ******* ***** **** an ********** ******* **** a **** ************** *** be **** ** **** or **** **** ***** price *** * **** hardware ****-**-**** *****.  

** *****-***** *********, ******** ****** they ******* *** ********* advantages: 

  • ******* ***** ** * days **. *-** **** average **** ****
  • ******** ****** ******* ** unopened/unused *********
  • ******* *** ** ****** with ******** ***-****** ** save ******* **** ** the *****
  • ****** ***** *** ***** recording *********** **. ******** with *** ******* ********
  • *********** *** ****** ****** to ********'* ******* ***** for ********

******** ***** ******, ** through ****** ************ **** Anixter *** *** ** preferred.  

Custom ***** ** *****

**** ****** ** *****-**-*****, which *** ******* ***-******* VMS ******** ****** ** the ********** ******* (******* purchase *** ********** ** handled ** *** ********** separately).

******** **** ****** **** can ***** ************* ******* not ********* ******** **** HP, **** ** ******* built **** ** ****** HDD's.

** ** ********** *** a ***** ******** **** multiple ********* **** *** work **** ******** ** create * ****** ***** or ***** ******** ** ensure **** ******** *** identically ********** ******** *** software.

********* ** ****-** ****, they *** ******* ****-****** is * **** **** order ********* ** ********.

Tech *******

*** **** ******* ***** handles **** ****** ****** and **************, *** ***** *******. Techs *** **** ******* on **** *** ********* and ****** ******* ******* functions, ******** **** ** provide ********** *** ********** to ****** ******** ** questions. 

******** **** ***** ********* like **** *****, ** it *** ***** ** problem ********** ****** ********, where *** ******** **** can **** ******** *** problems *** ****** *** or **-**** ******* ******** without *** ********** ******* to ******* ******** ******** and ******** *******.

**********

******* ** ***** *******, BCDVideo ****** ******* ********* **** *** *** **** through ** ********** ******* to **** ********* **** suited ** ******** *****, evaluating ****** **** ********* throughput ** *** ***********.

*** ********* ********, ***-********** switches *** *******, ******** *** need *** ********** **-**** techs ** **** ** configure ********* ******* ** switches.

Comments (16)

we have always had good luck with BCD and the products they provide

Pretty good article that really spells out the value propositions the company is providing. It also helps the company being upfront about the exact value it offers without the smoke and mirrors.

I've purchased a good 50 or so HP servers and workstations from them over the past couple years. Excellent support and a willingness to work with us on custom build requirements. The HP product support plans are also excellent. I had a hard drive fail, detected it, and had a replacement hard drive installed by an HP tech within the same day. That was on a Next Business Day replacement plan.

Austin, thanks for the feedback. Have you bought servers for surveillance projects from HP or Dell directly? I am curious to hear how the experience differed.

I'm assuming I'm missing something but don't know what. The $17,000 Ingram quote seems a bit whack. And I assume that's dealer cost.

Using CDW retail pricing, I'm showing this:

What am I doing wrong?

Hard to see the details from your image, on the surface it looks like comparable specs, but given that even the Dell quote is 2x that, I think something is missing.

For Dell, the NBD service option added a good amount to the total build.

I also can't tell if the CDW server has a RAID controller by default.

If you can email me the shopping cart/quote specs I'll ask BCDVideo for their perspective on it.

Ok, will do.

Btw, I scrunched down the image for display only, you should be able to right click and open the image in a new window at full size/resolution.

The reason the price is so attractive is that you chose 3rd party Seagate drives for the build, which won't work in the server you have chosen. HPE's server features the Smart Chassis technology. The BCDVideo build is with 100% HPE parts and full bumper-to-bumper warranties.

In regards to the 64TB build you are price-comparing, the BCDVideo system includes the HPE-branded Enterprise Helium SATA drive. This is HPE's part number 793683-B21.

You have also selected Windows Server Essentials instead of full-blown Windows Server 2012 R2, and you have the three-year NBD on-site warranty rather than the 5-year. Although your 3-year warranty is valid for the server, it would not have covered the hard drives should they have worked. So it really is not an apples-to-anything comparison.

Hope this helps explain the price discrepancy.

Please run it again using all with all HPE parts on the drives, Windows Server 2012, and 5-year on-site and let us now how it works out!

Jeff Burgess, BCDVideo

So it really is not an apples-to-anything comparison...

No, it's not. Your apples are 25% smaller. :)

In regards to the 64TB build you are price-comparing, the BCDVideo system includes the HPE-branded Enterprise Helium SATA drive. This is HPE's part number 793683-B21.

AFAIK, the 793683-B21 is only a 6TB drive, whereas I was quoting 8 8TB drives for a 64TB total.

Can you clarify if

  1. The part# is wrong, and you intend the 8TB HPE Helium, 793695-B21?
  2. The part# is wrong AND the price is understated?
  3. The part# is correct and your capacity was overstated and should be 48TB?
  4. I'm mistaken?

I've changed the Windows. For the support though, CDW is only showing the 3 yr, can I buy two or does that not work?

Also, would you mind quoting a similar HP server with 6TB Purples? I'm don't know you what your experience and opinion is, but, on paper, I'm liking the WD drives.

Apologies for the typo. The drive we used for this build is indeed HPE's 793695-B21, the 8TB Helium Enterprise SATA drive. And there are 8 of them in the 64TB build price.

Yes, the drives are crazy expensive, CDW wants $2,000 per; and the lowest authorized price I could find anywhere was $1000 and even gray market was $800.

The 5y support adds another $1,000 and the full windows comes in $200 more.

So add about $6,000, maybe $13,500 total for the auth version? So, obviously BCD is the way to go here.

Still think that Ingram's dealer price is high, but the drives are key.

Can you give a quote on the all purple drive machine? I think a lot of people would have to consider purples give the price differential.

Thank you for that.

We just wanted to clear up the parts confusion on the original CDW quote so you had a fair comparison.

We exclusively sell to authorized security integrators, some directly, and most through security distribution. We certainly don't price systems on web sites nor to the end customer. If you are a security integrator, you are welcome to contact us at sales@bcdvideo.com, and we direct you to the proper build of our Orion Series that utilize WD purple drives. These are available through Anixter.

Ok, thank you as well.

Skipping the actual pricing, do you see-/expect greater demand for purple over the midline heliums? Have you seen better results in the field with either?

If one were to build with the purples, how would that impact the nbd hp support? Or would you use dell in those cases?

We constantly go back and forth with the concept of using BCD Video vs building our own Dell machines. I think this article does an excellent job explaining the value proposition of BCD Video. However, we always go back to this: If BCD Video fully optimizes the servers and workstations for us, how will our team of engineers and technicians really know where to start when troubleshooting? Or when explaining to IT about why certain hardware was selected over other hardware? Or when in a casino, why the client has to allow a BCD Video tech remote in (if permitted) or why a BCD Video tech is responding to the hardware issue?

We recently hired an experienced engineer who cannot build/quote a server on his own, or optimize it on his own from the ground up, because of his former company's dependence on BCD Video. His knowledge gap is extensive and, frankly, a bit unsettling - especially when he states "BCD Video has always done that for me". I always go back to the question: If we can't engineer it, build it, deploy it fully and independent of the manufacture then how good are we really?

Maybe I am way off base?

I've known IT Systems Admins who have never used anything but Dell or HP, and the scope of there knowledge was unsettling, too. It's like Socrates "Allegory of the Cave"; you may have become the best expert of what you always used, but if that is all you every used, it's all you ever known. I know because I've been there- the SMB world was a shock when I left the Enterprise world oh so long ago.

2, very interesting comment / question.

I created a new discussion to feature this and to get feedback: If We Can't Engineer It, Build It, And Deploy It Fully Independent Of The Manufacturer Then How Good Are We?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
Genetec Stratocast VSaaS Tested on Sep 05, 2019
The VSaaS market is rapidly expanding in 2019, with Verkada, Meraki, Eagle Eye, Avigilon and numerous startups growing their market share. When we...
Top Ways Security Integrators Improve Their Careers on Sep 03, 2019
With DIY products expanding and the future of integration debated, how do integrators stay sharp so they are not left behind? 180+ integrators...
Scylla AI Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 29, 2019
Scylla, an AI analytics startup, says they are targeting 1 Billion dollar valuation in 5 years and it "is not rocket science" to detect weapons and...
Uniview Pro 4K Camera Tested (IPC3238ER3-DVZ) on Aug 29, 2019
In our 8MP / 4K Fixed Lens Camera Shootout, Uniview's low end 8MP was firmly in the middle of the pack. Does their higher end Pro Series 4K camera...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
Warning: Windows 7 Update Crashing NVRs on Aug 26, 2019
Windows 7 updates are causing VMS servers to fail to boot. After running the update, impacted systems do not boot as normal, instead display this...

Most Recent Industry Reports

ONVIF Suspends Huawei on Sep 20, 2019
Huawei has been 'suspended', and effectively expelled, from ONVIF so long as US sanctions remain on the mega Chinese manufacturer. Inside this...
Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019
Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...