Integrators often cite bandwidth as a key concern for deploying IP cameras. Let's examine what the potential issues are and where they may be applicable:
- You do not have enough bandwidth for IP video (see our bandwidth tutorial if you want a review of the basics)
Why might you not have enough?
- Existing local network is old or antiquated
- Your local network is fairly new but already has too much traffic
- You are trying to send IP video over a wide area network (DSL, Cable Modem, T1, E1, DS3, etc.)
What might block you from solving this problem?
- It is too expensive to upgrade your internal network
- It is not possible or extremely expensive to upgrade the wide area network
- It is costly/complex to implement traffic engineering
We have 3 cases to examine:
Upgrade the Internal Network
You have dozens of IP cameras in a building/facility but the existing network does not have enough bandwidth to support IP cameras. The simplest solution is to simply deploy a secondary network to support the IP cameras. This is almost invariably cheaper than deploying analog cameras unless the cameras are very close (under 100 meters) to the server/headend. Slightly more complicated but perhaps cheaper is upgrading the existing network (say from 100Mb/s to 1000Mb/s).
Upgrade the Wide Area Network
You have IP cameras in a building or campus and want to stream those cameras to a central location for storage. This I think is just not feasible
. Technically it can be done but financially it is rarely justifiable. In most countries, the cost of 10MB/s WAN bandwidth is very expensive - in the range of $3,000 to $30,000 USD per month. At that price point, it is simply cheaper to store video from IP cameras at each local site.
This is only a problem for IP video to the extent that if it was solved it would benefit IP over analog. However, it is certainly not a shortcoming of IP.
Implement Traffic Engineering
You have a converged network where you are sending corporate data, voice over IP phone calls and IP video surveillance. To ensure that IP video does not ruin phone calls or disrupt important data transfers, you want to implement advanced network capabilities to ensure all services work without interfering with each other. This can certainly be expensive both in deploying equipment with these capabilities and dedicated trained engineers to configure/optimize them (see Cisco's webinar
on this). If you are deploying a large IP video system with hundreds of cameras across long distances, this is probably still cheaper than building out an analog CCTV system. If the number of cameras are smaller and the distances are shorter, you may solve this by deploying a secondary network simply dedicated to IP video surveillance.
This should be an interesting discussion. I just wanted to open with some general observations. There are lots of other aspects to consider. Please expand, disagree and debate this.
Related Reports on Bandwidth
Last Chance February 2018 Camera Course
on Feb 15, 2018
This is the last chance to get into the Winter camera course, starts next Tuesday. Register now.
IPVM provides the best education, live online...
Hanwha Wave VMS Tested
on Jan 22, 2018
Hanwha has released their first open platform VMS, Wisenet Wave, an Network Optix OEM (see test results) enhanced with integrations and...
VSaaS Usage Statistics 2018
on Jan 18, 2018
VSaaS has been a 'next big thing' for more than a decade. The prospect of managing, storing and streaming video from the cloud rather than...
Multicasting Surveillance Tutorial
on Jan 04, 2018
Network bandwidth can be a concern for some surveillance systems. While improvements in video codecs, such as smart codecs for H.264 and H.265,...
2018 IP Networking Book Released
on Jan 03, 2018
The new IP Networking Book 2018 is a 228-page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
QoS for Video Surveillance
on Dec 29, 2017
Along with VLANs, QoS is one of the most misunderstood topics in IP surveillance networks. Many purported "experts" claim it is required in any...
Hikvision NVR Load Testing
on Dec 14, 2017
IPVM members recently debated Hikvision NVR's performance under load in Hikvision 30+ Cameras On NVR - Apps And Client Really Slow Down And CPU...
D-Link ONVIF Switch Tested
on Dec 04, 2017
D-Link's surveillance switches claim to "enhance ease of use and streamline management" for network administrators, with simplified UIs and...
Camera Multi-Streaming Usage
on Nov 22, 2017
IP cameras typically support multiple streams, allowing a single camera to transmit multiple streams at different resolutions, frame rates and even...
Most Recent Industry Reports
Aruba Networks Profile
on Feb 22, 2018
Aruba Networks' presence in the video surveillance market has historically been limited. With a company focus on Wi-Fi first and switching...
Directory of 30+ LPR / ANPR Providers
on Feb 21, 2018
License Plate Recognition / Automatic Number Plate Recognition are a type of video analytics software that can identify and match license / number...
Visio For Video Surveillance Design
on Feb 20, 2018
Many integrators have standardized on AutoCAD for camera layouts but new users may be overwhelmed by its learning curve. Microsoft's Visio...
Hikvision Deletes Genetec Support
on Feb 20, 2018
There will be no peace between Hikvision and Genetec.
A year after Genetec expelled Hikvision (and Huawei, citing Chinese government control...