Integrators often cite bandwidth as a key concern for deploying IP cameras. Let's examine what the potential issues are and where they may be applicable:
- You do not have enough bandwidth for IP video (see our bandwidth tutorial if you want a review of the basics)
Why might you not have enough?
- Existing local network is old or antiquated
- Your local network is fairly new but already has too much traffic
- You are trying to send IP video over a wide area network (DSL, Cable Modem, T1, E1, DS3, etc.)
What might block you from solving this problem?
- It is too expensive to upgrade your internal network
- It is not possible or extremely expensive to upgrade the wide area network
- It is costly/complex to implement traffic engineering
We have 3 cases to examine:
Upgrade the Internal Network
You have dozens of IP cameras in a building/facility but the existing network does not have enough bandwidth to support IP cameras. The simplest solution is to simply deploy a secondary network to support the IP cameras. This is almost invariably cheaper than deploying analog cameras unless the cameras are very close (under 100 meters) to the server/headend. Slightly more complicated but perhaps cheaper is upgrading the existing network (say from 100Mb/s to 1000Mb/s).
Upgrade the Wide Area Network
You have IP cameras in a building or campus and want to stream those cameras to a central location for storage. This I think is just not feasible
. Technically it can be done but financially it is rarely justifiable. In most countries, the cost of 10MB/s WAN bandwidth is very expensive - in the range of $3,000 to $30,000 USD per month. At that price point, it is simply cheaper to store video from IP cameras at each local site.
This is only a problem for IP video to the extent that if it was solved it would benefit IP over analog. However, it is certainly not a shortcoming of IP.
Implement Traffic Engineering
You have a converged network where you are sending corporate data, voice over IP phone calls and IP video surveillance. To ensure that IP video does not ruin phone calls or disrupt important data transfers, you want to implement advanced network capabilities to ensure all services work without interfering with each other. This can certainly be expensive both in deploying equipment with these capabilities and dedicated trained engineers to configure/optimize them (see Cisco's webinar
on this). If you are deploying a large IP video system with hundreds of cameras across long distances, this is probably still cheaper than building out an analog CCTV system. If the number of cameras are smaller and the distances are shorter, you may solve this by deploying a secondary network simply dedicated to IP video surveillance.
This should be an interesting discussion. I just wanted to open with some general observations. There are lots of other aspects to consider. Please expand, disagree and debate this.
Related Reports on Bandwidth
September IP Networking Course
on Sep 14, 2017
LAST Chance - Registration is ending. Register now.
This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals...
October Camera Course
on Sep 07, 2017
Learn video surveillance and get certified.
IPVM provides live online classes, recorded videos, personal help, cutting edge education and...
Dahua 4K IR PTZ Tested
on Aug 21, 2017
4K has made its way to IR PTZs. In this report, we examine the Dahua 6AE830VNI, a 4K PTZ with 30x optical zoom, 200m (~650') integrated IR, and...
IP Camera Specification / RFP Guide 2017
on Aug 14, 2017
RFPs are hard.
Do them 'right' and it takes a lot of knowledge and time.
Do them 'wrong' and you can be (a) unwittingly locked into a specific...
IR Surveillance Guide
on Jul 31, 2017
Infrared (IR) has become an increasing core component to video surveillance systems.
In particular, the expansion of integrated IR cameras that...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial 2017
on Jun 30, 2017
For years, video surveillance professionals have talked about the potential for H.265.
Now, in 2017, H.265 is starting to gain mainstream...
Hikvision H.265+ Tested
on Jun 27, 2017
Hikvision, which in the past few years released H.264+ (see test results) has now released H.265+, that claims even greater bandwidth savings.
Most Recent Industry Reports
New IPVM Calculator V3 Released
on Sep 20, 2017
The New IPVM Calculator V3 is released. An entirely new architecture delivers the following benefits:
The calculator is now ~50% faster in...
Avigilon 'Blue' Cloud Entry Examined
on Sep 19, 2017
Avigilon is moving to the cloud. The company announced their Avigilon Blue platform, designed to be a web-managed surveillance system, utilizing...
HID Buys Mercury Security
on Sep 19, 2017
One of the biggest access control deals in years.
Mercury Security, the most widely used access hardware OEM, and partner to 20+ manufacturers,...
Hikvision Backdoor Exploit
on Sep 18, 2017
Full disclosure to the Hikvision backdoor has been released, allowing easy exploit of vulnerable Hikvision IP cameras.
As the researcher, Monte...