Axis Multi-Imager Panoramic / PTZ Q6000-E

By John Honovich, Published Sep 29, 2014, 12:00am EDT (Info+)

Axis has launched its first multi-imager panoramic, entering in to a promising market with limited suppliers, most notably Arecont.

However, Axis has taken a unique approach to this camera.

In this note, we examine the features, pricing, strengths and weaknesses of it.

'Combo' ******

*** *****-****** *** ****** (*** *****-* [link ** ****** *********]) ** ** accessory *** ********** ** **** ***-* PTZ ****** [**** ** ****** *********]. It *** *** ** **** *****-*****. Rather, ** ** ******** ** ** tightly ********** **** *** ***, **** so:

*** *****-****** *****-* ****** ** ******* and ********* ******* *** *** ** there ** ** **** *** *** cabling ** ************.

*** *****-* **** (*) *** ******* covering **° ****. *** ***** ********, however, ** *.*** ****.

******** ****** *** *****-****** ******* ******** the *** ******. ** ******** ***, therefore, **** *** ****** *** **** with *** *****-******. ** **** *** specific ********, *******, *******, *** *********** slave *** *** ** *** / tilt / **** **** **** ******** area.

*******

*** **** ** *** *****-* *****-****** is $**** ***. ******** **** *** cost ** *** ***-*, *** ***** price ** ** *** ~$*****.

******* **** ********

**** *** ****** ******* ***** ********* *** ******. **** **** **** ***** ** a ********** ** *** *** *****-* with *** ***** ***** ****** **** and *** ********* ************** ***** ** both (*******) ********* *** ***.

*********

**** ** * ************* ************** ** slaving **** ** ***** *******. ***** this ******** *** **** ***** *** years, ********* ** ** ******** *********** two *******. **** ********, **** **** done **** **** ******* ******* *** PTZs.

*** *** ******** **** ***:

  • ******* ************ (**** *** '*****' ****** rather **** * ******** **** ** be ******** *** **********) *** ****** aesthetics
  • ******* ******* ** * *****-****** **** a *******.

*** *** ***** (********* ***** *********** with ** ***** *********) ******* *** an ******** ********, **** ** ** appealing ******.

**********

*** *** ********** ** **** ** is **** ********* ** * *** accessory. ****** *** ***** * ****, stand-alone *****-****** ********* *** ** *** a *** ** *** **, ***** is ***********.

*******, ** ******, ** *** ******* decline ***** ****** *****, ***** ***** **** ************ * niche.

**** ** * *****, ******* *****-******************* * **** ********* ****** **** for *** ******. **, *** ****, Axis **** ***** ***, ** **** spur ******** *** **********.

***** ** **** ****. **** ******** the ***** ******* *** ****** ********* their *** ******* ******* *******. ******* something ******* **** ****** ****. *** today, ******, **** ** *** *****'* most ************* *** *********.

Axis **** *****

****** *** ****: **** *** ******** a **** ***** **** ***** *** camera ** ***:

Comments (22)

John Honovich

IPVM | 09/29/14 10:23am

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #1

09/29/14 10:41am

This is certainly a unique approach. I'm curious to see how this product does, my experience is that the 180 degree panoramics tend to get far more use than the 360's and a big draw of both approaches is to limit the overall visibility of cameras installed. This does address the other major selling point of multi-imagers, which is reduced cabling and install time.

Also, I'm guessing to make this work as intended you need some specific VMS integrations? I wonder how licensing is done, especially when very few PTZs have a true 360 degree coverage requirement (eg: they're mounted to a building corner and typically need 270 degree or less coverage.) Is this 1, 2, or 5 channels of video?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 09/29/14 10:43am

I believe it's 5 channels of video - 4 from the panoramic, 1 from the PTZ.

It's one IP address, so under Milestone's rules, perhaps it's just 1 camera license. I am sure this will become clearer as this rolls out.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #1

In reply to John Honovich | 09/29/14 10:50am

Not to totally sidetrack this, but...

I'm not super familiar with Milestones licensing, but if it's 1 license per IP address, could you put all your IP cameras behind an internal firewall using port-forwarding and write a custom driver to break them out by channel to appear like a multi-channel encoder or multi-sensor camera? Or it seems like you could "easily" write some iptables rules and a little bit of nginx coding on a cheap linux box to mimic the API of a 32 channel Axis encoder? At some point that would quickly add up to huge savings in license costs.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

Undisclosed Integrator #2

In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 09/29/14 11:29am

Its one license per Mac Address in Milestone. In this scenerio the router would present the Mac's. :) But I get what your saying yes you could "pretend" to be a 32 Way Encoder and have 16 HD IP cameras.. I think alot of the axis encoder use an IP / Mac per 4 channels.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #2 | 09/29/14 11:32am

No, given that the router is a router, the Milestone server would only be aware of the MAC address of the router itself, not of any cameras behind it.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #2

09/29/14 11:39am

I meant "wouldn't present" so you might add one but you can't have duplicate Mac's in M/S :)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #2

09/29/14 11:46am

One Mac per device, You license the MAC to create a DLK the DLK is registered against the SLC. In the old days different devices create a different channel requirement on the MAC. I've seen a twin channel ip camera ( one built in channel and one analogue input) let you have 2 but a 4 way encoder have 4 channels :madness: Of course now the analogue channel has been removed, but you need to be careful on the IP/MAC the device actaully has like the 16 axis units, which have a 4x macs - IP's so 4 license requirement :)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

nidal gharzeddine

09/29/14 11:52am

4,000$ isn't that too high for a saving in cable and a network port VS a standard PTZ with a multi-imager ex:arecont ( incase the above VMS licensing doesn’t work).

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to nidal gharzeddine | 09/29/14 11:58am

Nidal, agreed.... if you want both. If you want just a panoramic multi-imager, that's the issue.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Manufacturer #3

09/29/14 01:03pm

So far given poll results, comments and the fact this does not provide a direct competitive product to Arecont's multi-imager product except in maybe a very small percentage of cases, I'd say except for Axis fans and dealers, this is pretty insignificant offering.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #3 | 09/29/14 01:34pm

Yep, or PTZ fans....

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

nidal gharzeddine

09/29/14 02:19pm

It would be interesting to get Axis's input on the intended markets and expected market share for it.

Maybe they could shed some light on an angle we are missing.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to nidal gharzeddine | 09/29/14 02:21pm

We talked to Axis. It is marketed towards larger PTZ users, which they clearly have a lot of. It will help them differentiate against bigger PTZ rivals like Pelco, Sony, etc.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #5

In reply to nidal gharzeddine | 09/29/14 09:49pm

I was equally perplexed on what the target market was. However they did say they believe it would be used for traffic cameras over an intersection as an example of a use case.

Maybe there is a use in casinos or along the front lines in retail?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #4

09/29/14 02:36pm

Seems like Axis got the idea from Scanzone to have a PTZ and multiple cameras in a single enclosure on a pole www.sanzone.ie. I think the Axis product looks a little more refined(cheaper)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #4 | 09/29/14 02:43pm

Such combinations have been around for a decade or more. The first one I remeber is DyanPel - combo with analytics.

Most recent i've seen is Vivotek's panormaic PTZ.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #2

09/29/14 03:35pm

Are the 4 (360) imagers Day / Night?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #5

09/29/14 09:25pm
Our Axis sales manager said they would eventually release it standalone with a plug to make up for the PTZ. Also the gray banding in between will eventually switch to all black.
Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | 02/05/15 08:59am

Update: Axis has released a demo video showing how the cameras work together. Video below:

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Luis Carmona

Geutebruck USA
IPVMU Certified | 02/05/15 01:12pm

Interesting. Have they mentioned anything about how many they are selling?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Luis Carmona | 02/05/15 01:16pm

Axis rarely gives commentary on what individual products they are selling, so I didn't see any on this one and we have not asked.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts reporting, tutorials and software funded by subscriber's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Loading Related Reports