Avigilon Favorability Results 2017

By John Honovich, Published on Feb 27, 2017

One of the fastest growing companies has turned into one of the rockiest, as cooling growth, management turnover and a roller coaster stock price shakes Avigilon.

So how do integrators feel about Avigilon? 100+ integrators told IPVM in detail, revealing the following key trends:

  • Support strong
  • Balanced product performance with one key weakness
  • Expensive objections
  • Dealer debate
  • Untrustworthy objections

Statistics ********

******** *** * ****** overall ************:

******** *** ** *** tier ******* *** *** bested ** * ****** of *********** ********* ****, Genetec *** *********.

*******

********'* ******* ******** ******* was *** ***** ******** from ***********:

  • "**** ********* *******, ** Support **** ******** ** needed."
  • "******* ** **** ****."
  • "**** ******* ** *** industry, **** ********** ******** and ******** *******. ******** without ********* ******* ********, is * **** ** convince **** *********"
  • "**** ******* ** ***** and ********. ****** ********* up *** ********."
  • "********* ***** ******* *** tech *******."
  • "**** *** *** ***** support, *** ***** **** support"
  • "**** **** ******* ** the ********. *** ** like *** ***** ******* personnel."
  • "***** **** *******. ** recurring/yearly ****."
  • "******** *** **** * great ******* ** **** support *** ********* *** help **** *** ********. Customers **** ** ******* it ** ****** ** use *** **** ******** but **** ***** ** an ***** *** **** to **** **/* ***** tech *******."
  • "*** ******* ** ******* great, ********* **** **** up, *** **** **** resolve ** *******."
  • "********* ******* *** **** consistently ****."
  • "******** ******* ** ****** top *****."
  • "***** **** *******-** ****** charges. *** ***** *******."
  • "******** - **/* *******"
  • "********* *** ***** *******, easy ******* *** ************* tools"
  • "******* **** ******** ***** 2011 *** ** *** no ********** ******* *** sales, ******** ******, ***** Sales ********, ********* ******* to ** ** *** users. ******* **** *** providing ***** **** ******* so ** *** ***** on *******."

Product ***********

********** ******* ** ******** showed ********* ****** *********, cameras *** ***, *** contrary ** ********'* ******** camera ***** *********, *** and ********* *** ******** than *******.

*** *******, ********** ******** on ********'* *** *** strong:

  • "*** ** **** **** and **** ** *********** cost."
  • "**** **** * **** solid ***"
  • "**** *** ********, **** to *******, **** * very ******** ***."
  • "******** *** * * great ***."
  • "* ***** *** *** them *****."
  • "*** *** ** *** real ****** ** *** Avigilon ** ** **** projects. ** **** **** used ***** ******** ** analog ******* ** **** advantage ** *** ***. All ** *** ******* love *** *********."

*********, ******** ******** *** bullish:

  • "***** *********" (**** ** two ***********)
  • "********* *** *********."
  • "*** *** **** ********* included ** ** ********** proposition."
  • "** ********* ** ******** Avigilon ** **** ** beat"
  • "* **** ********'* *********."
  • "*** **** *********"
  • "**** ***** *****-** ********* options"
  • "***** ********* *** *********."

******** **** *** **** overall ******** ** *******, but ******* ** ******* relative ** **** ******** has ************ **** **** known ***:

  • "***** ******* *** **** reliable, **** **** *** problems ** *** ****."
  • "***** ******* *** *********."
  • "********* ***** ** *******."
  • "**** ******* *******."
  • "***** ***** *******."

*** ******* ** ******** feedback ****** ***, ********* and ******* ***** **** integrators *** ********** ******** Avigilon *** *** ******** of *** ******* ***** 'solution'.

Weak ****** *******

*** *** ******** ******* area ***** *********** **** clearly ******* ******** *** access *******:

  • "********: ****** ******* ** buggy, *** ******** *** some *********."
  • "***'* ***** ***** ****** control *** *** ****** features."
  • "****** ******* ******* ** not **** *** ********. Should *** ** **** in *** ******* ******."
  • "*** ****** ******* ** outdated."

****, ***** **** **** few ******** ********** ***** Avigilon's ****** *******. **** does *** ******** ** because ********'* *********** ******** in ****** ******* *** been ******* *** ********** ** *** ******* had ***** ************.

Expensive **********

*** ****** ********* *** Avigilon's *************, ******* ** cameras:

  • "*** *********"
  • "*** **** ***, **** very ******* ******** ***. Good *** *********** ******* only."
  • "** ****** ** **** conscious *** **** ***'* seem (******** ** "****") to ** *** ******** to *** ******"
  • "***** **** *** *** pricey *** ** *********** as * *******."
  • "**** *******, *** *** megapixel ******* - ***** best ********* - *****'* other ********* **** ****** prices!"
  • "******** ******* *** **** expensive."
  • "**** ** ***** *** cost ** *** ***** VMS."
  • "*** *** ** *** is ****** ***** *** for * ******** ** my *******, *** ****** is *** ********* *** what * *** ******* with **."
  • "* *** ** ******* Hikvision ******* ** ******** because ***** ****** *** the ******* ****."
  • "********: *****-***** ***** **** cannot ** *********** ** every *********."
  • "******* ***** ** ** brought **** * ****** more *** ** *** state ** *** ******."

* *** ***** ***, Avigilon ******* **** ***** cost ***********, *** **** with ***** ****** ***** cut, *** ***** **** in ****** ******* ****** by *** ******* *** made *** ****** ************* tougher *** ********.

Proprietary ********

**** *********** **** ********* about ********'* ********** / focus ** ***** *** end ** *** ********:

  • "* ****** **** ** an **** ******* ********"
  • "***** *********, *** **** come ** *** **** of ******, *********** ********, which ******** * ****."
  • "********* ** ********* ** other ***"
  • "***** ********** **** ******** and ******** ** ***** cameras ****** **** ***** a ****** ******."
  • "* **** ** *** negative **** ******* ** occasion * **** ****** to *** *** ** their ******* *** ******'* because ***** *** * different *** ***** ****."
  • "* **** *** **** of *** ** *** software, **** *** *********** aspect ** **."
  • "*** **** ***** * would ******* ** ** that * **** **** were **** ****, *** they've ********* * ****** end-to-end ******** **** ***** the ******** ** ********* more ******** *** ***** than **** ***** **** ask ***."

Dealer ******

********'* ******* ********** ****** channel ********* ****** *** complaints.

** *** *** ****, many ******* ****** **** approach:

  • "* **** **** **** protect ***** ****** *******"
  • "**** **** ******* * certified ****** ****."
  • "********* ************ *****"
  • "**** *** ******/******* *****."
  • "* **** **** * can **** ******** *** not ******** **** ***."

****** ******** **, ********** those *** **** ****** dealer ******:

  • "* ** *** * fan ** *** ****** protections, ** * **** several ******* **** *** leaving *** ***** *** to **** ****** *******."
  • "*******: ***** *****. *** HAVE ** ** ******** (TYPICALLY ** ******) ** SELL ***** *******."
  • "*** **** ********-*******, **** of **** **** ** idea *** **** ******* Avigilon."
  • "***'* *** **** ******* the ****** ** ******* with *******."
  • "** ** **** *** me ** ** ******** if * ** *** allowed ** ** * dealer."
  • "*******- *'* *** * dealer ** * ***'* get **! ;)"

*************

*** **** ********** ******** against ******** *** ***** its ***** *** ********* being *************:

  • "**** *** ********"
  • "* ********** ** * company **** ** *********. Promises *********** ******"
  • "**** *** *** ****** honest **** *** *****."
  • "******* ***** *** ***** proprietary ****** ** ********."
  • "**** ******** *** ******** company. **** *********** **** I ****** **** **** I **** ** ******** in ******** ** **** is *** ****'** *******. It ***** ** ** they **** ** **** a ********* **** ** a * *****, ** day *****."
  • "**** ** * ********* machine, *** ******* **** sell ** ****** ********** and **** *** *********** selling ** *** *** users ****** ** **** all ****** *** ******** one ***."
  • "***** ****** ***** *******."
  • "*** ******** **** ** the **** ******* ***** that ******* *** **** seen. ****, **'* *** that ****, *** ** is ********* ******* ** as ****. *** ******* between *** **** *** actual ********** ** * pretty *** **********. ***** has ***** **** * system **** **** **** look ** *** **** good. *** ******* ** overburdened ******* ********* *** under-performing *******."
  • "*** ******* *** * history ** *** ****** of "**** *** ******" demo ********** (***** ***** massive ** ****** **** a **** ****** ****** the ****, ***** ****'** selling ***** *-*** *******. They ***'* *** ***** the **** ****** ***** the *** ****'** *******, but **** ********** ***'* go *** ** ***** way ** ****** *** client)."
  • "**** ** *********, *** in **** ****"
  • "****** ***'* **** ********** sales *** ********* ********."
  • "***** ********** ********* *** sales ********** **** *** allow *** * ****** longterm ***********."

*******, *** ********** ***** a ********* ****-******:

* **** *** * would **** **** ******** towards ****, * ***** they **** **** ******* by *** ********* ********* as *** ******** ****. Our *** *** ***** to **** ** *****.

** **********-******'***** ****' ** ******** growth, *** ********** *** win ** *** *****, culture *** ********** *****. However, ** *** *** been ***** *.* ***** since******* *** ********* ** **** **** Avigilon ***** **** ****** significantly **** ********.

*******

*******, ******** ** ** fairly ****** ***** **** integrators. ** ********** *** a ******* **** ******* on ******* *** *** end-to-end ********, ***** ************ is *********. ********'* **** challenges *** ***** (**** everyone) *** ******** ***** own ************ *************** **** expectations.

Comments (10)

Quik Trip stores seem to be hooked on avigilon, however when looking at them on the tvs they have hanging, Im not impressed at all. FPS seem really low and the resolution is poor, id say even a 1.3MP is much better than what they have....mind you this has been seen at stores less than a year old.

Avigilon cams turn bandwidth down when a cam is sitting and not pulled up recentlyor zoomed in on. When this happens the image is slightly degraded and does not give you the crisp image you are looking for. I did a school district with an Avigilon head end. In the lobby I used 1.3mp Panasonic cams. Image is awesome and secretaries can actually see who is at the door and what the are carrying. While doing preliminary set up for job with Avigilon they asked if we were using all their cameras. When I told them no that Panasonics were going in lobby they said to just put in one of their 3mp cams in instead. Needless to say we didn't and customer now sees why we put in cams we did. I like the head end and it is easy to use. I just don't like that they push their cams on you for everything.

Avigilon cams turn bandwidth down when a cam is sitting and not pulled up recentlyor zoomed in on.

This is incorrect.  Unless you are using "Idle Scene Mode" the cameras don't make any adjustments to the bandwidth.  What is happening the clients are automatically selecting the HD or SD Streams from the cameras depending on the available bandwidth, monitor resolution or matrix view.  This is called HDSM and it is designed to automatically adjust the streams to save you server to client bandwidth and processing power on your clients while needing zero setup time.  

If you want or need only the HD stream from the camera all you have to do disable the second stream in an Avigilon camera.  Then you will have the same results you get with the Panasonic camera. 

Unless you are using "Idle Scene Mode" the cameras don't make any adjustments to the bandwidth.

If "Idle Scene Mode" is enabled though, does the behavior Matthew describes occur, i.e. slight degradation, when it kicks in?

"Idle Scene Mode" adjusts image rate, image quality, bit rate and key frame depending on motion/analytics in the scene.   So if there is no motion you get settings X when there motion/analytics switch settings to Y.   

Screen resolution, matrix view or digital zoom does not change "Idle Scene Mode" If you want an HD image all the time with an Avigilon camera uncheck "enable secondary stream" in the camera.  By using the Panasonic camera only get the HD stream and you lose any of the bandwidth saving features, pixel search, firmware updates and more. 

Also, poorly configuring motion detection is likely the reason idle scene mode is occurring.  Learn to adjust thresholds people, don't just stick with default no matter which VMS.

This may also be HDSM based on the description.  If that is the case this can be overridden at the client by selecting Max quality, with the downside being significantly more processing and bandwidth at the client.

    I've read this thread with great interest. We are newly considering Avigilon because the Enterprise Level Customer specifies this site to be compatible with remote software. 

This means the NVR at minimum correct?

If anyone has anything to add to refresh the consensus for Q4/17

Please let us know how well Avigilon is maintaining now? 

I work for AVIGILON although in a different part of the world. A lot of what I read above as being 'negative' seems to be down to SI's not selecting and or applying the correct settings and understanding HDSM as explained very well by Michael Miller. Training however is free through the online portal and in-person training is also free.

Most cameras nowadays come with features such as Idle Scene and Smart Codec and it's important to understand what these features do and when to tick the box or not tick the box in the cameras firmware.

Having been with the company for nearly 5 years I have seen the change of the guard and this has had a really good influence at all levels of the business.

I'm not sure what you mean with the NVR at minimum but if you wish to elaborate on that subject I'd be happy to reply to your question.

   Thanks for your encouraging reply. At a minimum, NVR was my referring to other brands of cameras working well with the VMS when viewed remotely or when reviewing archival footage. I was very impressed with footage that I've seen from panoramic cameras but wanted to be able to use less expensive cameras in less demanding positions if it helped get the business within the clients budget.

For viewing remote sites using the Client software you would require to run a Server (NVR) on site like and EDGE NVR, an Appliance or a Server which you could combine with nearly any ONVIF camera as well as the AVO range of cameras. This would give you access to live view as well as playback etc. There are EDGE cameras within the AVO range as well with on-board storage by means of SSD which can be deployed without the need of a local recording solution like an NVR on remote sites. The Client software is FOC. I hope this helps.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,598 reports, 889 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Favorite Access Control Manufacturers 2020 on Sep 28, 2020
200+ Integrators told IPVM "What is your favorite access control management...
Mobotix Thermal Detection Camera Tested on Jun 09, 2020
For years Mobotix has struggled but now sales are surging driven by Mobotix's...
FLIR A Series Temperature Screening Cameras Tested on Jun 04, 2020
FLIR is one of the biggest names in thermal and one of the most conservative....
Temperature Screening Is Ineffective, Says US, UK, Canada, Israel, And Ireland Health Leaders on Aug 25, 2020
Health leaders around the world are increasingly speaking out about the...
Favorite Access Control Credentials 2020 on Sep 15, 2020
Credential choice is more debated than ever, with hacking risk for 125kHz and...
Worse: ZKTeco 8" Worse Temperature Results Than 5" Tested on Jun 16, 2020
While ZKTeco USA's CEO objected to IPVM's SpeedFace+ 5" test results, saying...
Directory of 211 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Oct 14, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
FaceFirst Problems And Layoff on Oct 01, 2020
FaceFirst, a US company and one of the oldest ongoing facial recognition...
Verkada Speaks On Disrupting Security Sales Channel on Aug 28, 2020
Verkada's fast growth has taken the industry by storm and their enterprise...
2020 Mid Year Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Jul 27, 2020
The first half of 2020 has been shocking, for the world generally, and for...
Avigilon Announces 10K / 61MP H5 Pro Camera on Oct 05, 2020
Avigilon announced its 10K / 61MP H5 Pro camera at the 2020 IPVM Fall New...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
The Next Hot Fever Detection Trend - $100 Wall-Mounted Units on Jul 06, 2020
The first wave of the booming fever detecting market was $10,000+ cameras,...

Recent Reports

Consultants Online Show LIVE Today! on Oct 27, 2020
IPVM's 7th online show will feature 20+ consultants and recruiters presenting...
Eagle Eye Networks Raises $40 Million on Oct 27, 2020
Eagle Eye has raised $40 million aiming to "reinvent video...
Hikvision Q3 2020 Global Revenue Rises, US Revenue Falls on Oct 27, 2020
While Hikvision's global revenue rises driven by domestic recovery, its US...
VICE Investigates Verkada's Harassing "RawVerkadawgz" on Oct 26, 2020
This month, IPVM investigated Verkada's sexism, discrimination, and cultural...
Six Flags' FDA Violating Outdoor Dahua Fever Cameras on Oct 26, 2020
As Six Flags scrambled to reopen parks amid plummeting revenues caused by the...
ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...
Nokia Fever Screening Claims To "Advance Fight Against COVID-19" on Oct 22, 2020
First IBM, then briefly Clorox, and now Nokia becomes the latest Fortune 500...
Deceptive Meridian Temperature Tablets Endanger Public Safety on Oct 21, 2020
IPVM's testing of and investigation into Meridian Kiosk's temperature...
Honeywell 30 Series and Vivotek NVRs Tested on Oct 21, 2020
The NDAA ban has driven many users to look for low-cost NVRs not made by...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...